California supreme court case information
[DOCX File]docs.cpuc.ca.gov
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_d00f56.html
Potential PROPOSERs FROM: Administrative Office of the Courts Information Services Division DATE: November 21, 2006 SUBJECT/PURPOSE OF MEMO: Request for proposals The AOC, California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal seek an enterprise content management solution capable of solving challenges around collaborative document management, learning ...
[DOC File]Arizona, California, Hawaii and Nevada State Court Case ...
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_c90b9b.html
Fifty percent of POC’s time spent participating in the Supreme Court case is reasonable for compensation because it was specifically requested to participate by the Supreme Court clerk. Although POC provided information regarding AB 1054 and California’s legislative directives to improve utility wildfire planning, that legislation was ...
[DOC File]GENERAL INFORMATION - California Courts
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_665b3f.html
On November 8, 2011 the California Supreme Court heard argument in the Brinker Restaurant case about California meal period and rest break laws, among other issues. And because the ruling, due within 90 days, may have a significant bearing on how the parties continue to pursue the timecard data entry and scanning, the parties have agreed to a ...
[DOC File]REQUEST FOR REDACTION OF NAME FROM CALIFORNIA …
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_bbbac2.html
Supreme Court Case Presentation Project. AP Government . Directions: You will be assigned a landmark Supreme Court case, which you will create a handout that will cover the following: Problems/causes that led to the case. The Constitutional question raised by the participants in the case
Riley v. California - Wikipedia
Potential PROPOSERs FROM: Administrative Office of the Courts Information Services Division DATE: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 SUBJECT/PURPOSE OF MEMO: Request for proposals The AOC, California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal seek a document management solution capable automating document management in support of E-Filing for the Appellate Courts.
[DOC File]Superior Court, State of California
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_9a92c5.html
A 2007 California Supreme Court decision determined that the names and compensation of public employees generally are considered public information under the California Public Records Act (CPRA). Since this decision, the County has received, and continues to receive, many Public Records Act requests calling for lists of County employees, often ...
[DOC File]Pleading
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_269095.html
Feb 04, 2021 · Superior Court (Williams) (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 551 [“That the eventual proper scope of a putative representative action is as yet uncertain is no obstacle to discovery; a party may proceed with [discovery] precisely in order to ascertain that scope.”].) As explained by the California Supreme Court in Williams, under PAGA,
[DOC File]Superior Court, State of California
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_52cdcb.html
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Department 6, Honorable Theodore C. Zayner Presiding. Maggie Castellon, Courtroom Clerk. TBA, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2160 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS. FOR DEPARTMENT 8
[DOC File]STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_1b3ad2.html
ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, HAWAII AND NEVADA STATE COURT. CASE INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET. More and more State Courts in the States we handle are making their Case Indexes, Dockets, and other case-specific information available for free on the Internet.
[DOC File]GENERAL INFORMATION - California Courts
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-case-information_1_b53835.html
C. Stipulated Facts – Case No. 07-N-14065. The parties agreed to the following stipulated facts. On May 4, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of California filed a disciplinary order in Case No. S150640 (State Bar Case Nos. 05-O-02605; 05-O-00458; 06-O-10082; 06-O-13487 (consolidated)) (“the order”).
Nearby & related entries:
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.