California supreme court docket search
[DOC File]The State Bar Court of California Home Page
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_0edd00.html
In connection with Reiner I, the Supreme Court ordered him to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court (rule 9.20) and timely file a compliance affidavit attesting that he had notified clients, co-counsel, and opposing counsel in pending matters of his suspension. Reiner not only failed to comply with rule 9.20, he refused to do so.
[DOC File]Pursuant to Supreme Court order dated , the advisory ...
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_f1f3d7.html
IN SUPREME COURT. No. C4-85-1848. In re: Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules of . Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch. Recommendations of the Minnesota Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch. November 9, 2006. Hon. Paul H. Anderson, Chair Mark R. Anfinson, Mpls. Donna ...
[DOC File]Arizona, California, Hawaii and Nevada State Court Case ...
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_c90b9b.html
Consequently, you can search for cases using party names, the trial court case number, keyword or any other word or number that is in the Opinion or the Docket. For example, if you search for the word, "escrow", you'll get a list of all the Opinions and Dockets that have the word, "escrow", in them.
[DOC File]California
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_50b1e0.html
Prior to August 21, 2013, Jando continued to monitor the online docket of the Petition maintained by Orange County Superior Court. In doing so, he noted that the court’s calendar did not note any hearing on August 21. On August 26, 2013, Jando e-mailed Respondent to inquire whether Respondent had attended court on August 21.
[DOCX File]California Courts
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_ba5e20.html
The California Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that Code of Civil Procedure section 1033, subdivision (a) does not apply to a motion for prevailing party attorney fees in the context of a FEHA claim, stating: “[S]ection 1033(a), interpreted according to its plain meaning, gives a trial court discretion to deny attorney fees ...
[DOC File]1 - SCOTUSblog
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_1f13cd.html
The California Supreme Court was objectively reasonable in holding that California’s “catch-all” instruction in capital cases was constitutional as applied to post-crime evidence in mitigation and that this jury had properly taken into account post-crime evidence. Majority: AMK …
[DOCX File]STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_38074e.html
The California Supreme Court pointed out that “‘however praiseworthy was the prosecution’s motive in protecting the informer from the threat of reprisal,’ we could not be indifferent to the resulting denial of the defendant’s substantial rights, and those ‘motives and purposes cannot prevail when, as here, they inevitably result ...
[DOCX File]amgovx_02_06_SJC_main_lecture_2020_v5-en
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_661106.html
The Supreme Court has nearly full control of its docket. For the most part, it hears only the cases it chooses to hear. Each year, about 10,000 losing parties ask the Supreme Court to hear their case.
[DOC File]Central California Appellate Program - CCAP
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_a49c0c.html
Although reference to a court is capitalized when a full or formal name is used, i.e., California Supreme Court, Fifth District Court of Appeal, do not capitalize a partial or general reference to a court: The Supreme Court has decided the issue. The state’s high court has decided the issue. The Fifth Appellate District has decided the issue.
[DOC File]Draft Report - California Courts
https://info.5y1.org/california-supreme-court-docket-search_1_79290c.html
The committee learned that, to assist the Supreme Court in fulfilling its role under the California Rules of Court governing the court’s grant of discretionary review (rules 8.500–8.512, former rules 28–28.2), the Supreme Court’s criminal and civil central staffs internally …
Nearby & related entries:
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.