Dc cir rules

    • [DOCX File]Introduction to Rulemaking - Louisiana State University

      https://info.5y1.org/dc-cir-rules_1_fc4a8f.html

      Limited to the DC Cir. and does not seem to make much difference. Substantial Impact Test for Procedural Rules and Policy Statements – Wrap-up. Same analysis as substantial impact or legally binding test for substantive rules. What is the actual impact on your client?


    • FORMAT OF BRIEFS - U.S. Court of Appeals - D.C. Circuit

      Limited to the DC Cir. and does not seem to make much difference. Substantial Impact Test for Procedural Rules and Policy Statements – Wrap-up Same analysis as substantial impact or legally binding test for substantive rules.


    • [DOCX File]Introduction to Rulemaking - Louisiana State University

      https://info.5y1.org/dc-cir-rules_1_767ede.html

      842 F.2d 1296, 1803 (DC Cir. 1988) ; Also see MCI Telecommunications Corp v Federal Communications Commission, 917 F.2d 30, 39 (DC Cir 1990) and Competitive Telecommunications Association v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 998 F.2d 1058, 1061 (DC Cir. 1993). Competitive Telecommunications Association, supra at 1061. Id.


    • Dracut P.S. BSEA #08-6414

      , 548 F.3d 116, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (stating that in addition to the public interest being well-served, there must also be a sufficiently “unique situation” to grant waiver); Northeast Cellular , 897 F.2d at 1166.


    • [DOCX File]Introduction - Federal Communications Commission

      https://info.5y1.org/dc-cir-rules_1_18663a.html

      Secretary of Health and Human Services, 817 F.2d 161, 168 (1st Cir. 1987). Therefore, we must determine whether there is a reasonable alternative interpretation that is consistent with the language of DC 5296 and does not render meaningless a part of that regulation. 10. The pre-1976 version of DC 5296 can reasonably be con-


    • [DOC File]O.G.C. Precedent 6-94

      https://info.5y1.org/dc-cir-rules_1_2a37bb.html

      , 697 F3d 1181 (DC Cir. 2012). The Court rejected the employers contention that the Board’s Health Care Rules violate Section 9(c)(5) of the Act because they give controlling weight to the extent of the unions organization in making unit determinations. The Court found “zero merit” to this argument.


    • [DOC File]Federal Communications Commission

      https://info.5y1.org/dc-cir-rules_1_3dd1bb.html

      The Executive Office of Administration and Finance Adjudicatory Rules of Practice and Procedure, which are applicable to BSEA hearings, allow for summary decision when there is no genuine issue of fact relating to all or part of a claim or defense, and the moving party is entitled to prevail as a matter of law. ... 1564 (DC Cir. 1989) (time ...


Nearby & related entries:

To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.

It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.

Literature Lottery

Advertisement