Otolaryngology journals impact factor

    • [DOC File]Personal Research Database

      https://info.5y1.org/otolaryngology-journals-impact-factor_1_4e75cf.html

      Stroke (Journal: Impact Factor 6.6; H Index 240) 2009-Present. Top 10 Most Accessed Articles, (6952 accesses) “Vestibular Effects on Cerebral Blood Flow” BMC Neuroscience (Journal: Impact Factor 2.7; H Index 65) 2009 2nd Runner Up, Space Medicine Branch …

      journal of otolaryngology


    • [DOC File]S C I E N T I F I C P R O G R A M - CSOHNS

      https://info.5y1.org/otolaryngology-journals-impact-factor_1_78aefd.html

      Inclusion of reviews increased the impact factor for JP by 0.610±0.153 U (±s.d.), which was significantly greater than that for AJP (0.109±0.086) and LI (0.147±0.088). However, for all three journals the total impact factor was largely a reflection of the citations of original articles.

      ent journal impact factor


    • Otolaryngology Case Reports - Impact Factor, Overall ...

      Journals with an impact factor < 0.8. First author . Second or lesser . Author of a clinical case report, idea or innovation or a technical note. in a refereed journal in the field of plastic surgery, otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgery.

      jama otolaryngology impact factor


    • [DOC File]C

      https://info.5y1.org/otolaryngology-journals-impact-factor_1_f509c4.html

      Dr. Alok Singla completed his medical school and subsequently Otolaryngology residency training at the University of Allahabad, India. After receiving an institutional license from the Pennsylva-nia Medical Board, he completed his NIH T32 post-doctoral fellowship in Pediatric Otolaryngology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

      otolaryngology head neck surgery journal


    • [DOC File]MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION FORM GUIDELINES

      https://info.5y1.org/otolaryngology-journals-impact-factor_1_3b684c.html

      Variables predicting higher quality meta-analyses were: published in higher impact factor journals (p=0.0033) and authors with previously published meta-analyses (p=0.0014). CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating meta-analyses in the Otolaryngologic literature.

      clinical otolaryngology


Nearby & related entries: