Relativism philosophers
[DOC File]The Coherence of Epistemological Relativism
https://info.5y1.org/relativism-philosophers_1_cb1f7b.html
The more people engage with radically different perspectives, the more they are drawn to moral relativism. 2. Relation to philosophical metaethics. As noted at the outset of this paper, many philosophers think both that the folk are objectivists about morality and that the folk view bears on the philosophical truth about morality.
[DOC File]Three Kinds of Relativism - Paul Boghossian
https://info.5y1.org/relativism-philosophers_1_11cb49.html
Even if grammatical relativism is true, its truth may come as a surprise to some people, just as the existence of grammatical universals may come as a surprise to some people. Finally, I should stress that grammatical relativism is a doctrine about the grammaticality of phonetic strings – not phonological strings.
[DOC File]RELATIVISM - Stanford University
https://info.5y1.org/relativism-philosophers_1_47fae7.html
Philosophers often argue that the existence of cultural differences does not prove that cultural relativism is a correct doctrine. However, the defense of cultural relativism does not merely rest with differences, the first point mentioned above. The other two points are as important.
[DOC File]CULTURAL RELATIVISM - Cleveland State University
https://info.5y1.org/relativism-philosophers_1_fcd40d.html
Philosophers who want to use faultless disagreement to motivate alethic relativism, however, face a formidable challenge, one that has been well brought out by Mark Richard. (Richard himself is an alethic relativist about certain domains, but he rejects the claim that it can be motivated by appeal to faultless disagreement.)
Relativism - By Branch / Doctrine - The Basics of Philosophy
Relativism is anti-authoritarian only in the sense that it takes away any reason you might have for considering the opinions and arguments of others in forming your beliefs (for instance, the opinion of someone better informed than you are). For relativism says that your beliefs are all true (for you) no matter what anyone else may say or think.
[DOC File]RELATIVISM - Stanford University
https://info.5y1.org/relativism-philosophers_1_2d2697.html
Other philosophers, however, such as Charles Sanders Peirce, have disagreed with Descartes, maintaining that we are always going to be fallible in everything we believe (the term "fallibilism" was Peirce's invention). Some relativists seem directly to equate relativism with fallibilism.
Nearby & related entries:
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.