Statistically significant vs not significant: free download. On-line document store on 5y1.org

[DOC File]PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR FINAL EXAM
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_157250.html
There is a 33.3-fold increase in oropharyngeal cancer in patients seropositive for E6 or E7 but it is not statistically significant. There is a 32.2-fold adjusted increase in the odds of oropharyngeal cancer for those with Seropositive HPV-16 L1 serologic status and it is statistically significant.
statistically significant difference

[DOCX File]Statistical Conclusion Validity
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_81e7c3.html
A “statistically significant” result: The data are so discrepant with the null hypothesis that we reject the null hypothesis. Since the null hypothesis asserts that there is no relationship between the variables, this amounts to our asserting that there is a relationship between the variables. Such a result is commonly referred to as a ...
statistically significant but not meaningful

[DOCX File]sites.bu.edu
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_9db497.html
The simple regression between total payroll and win percentage proved that payroll was highly significant in relation to win percentage. But, when statistically relevant factors were added to the original simple regression, home attendance seemed to be the most correlated with win percentage, not …
what is statistically significant

[DOC File]Sampling and Sample Size - Columbia University
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_f3ad1b.html
An effect can be statistically significant but not clinically significant. And if an effect is not statistically significant its clinical significance cannot be assessed. That is, statistical significance is a necessary precondition for clinical significance but says nothing about the actual magnitude of the effect.
what does not statistically significant

[DOC File]Significant Disproportionality and Disproportionate ...
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_6aa292.html
To determine statistically significant over-representation: For the first analysis, an ODDS/RISK ratio was set at greater than 1 and a chi-square P-value
statistically significant vs meaningful

[DOCX File]ww2.justanswer.com
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_af6afe.html
May 23, 2014 · value is not . statistically significant at the 0.05 level. We do not have enough evidence to reject the claim that Groups . and condition (having or not flu) are independent. 3. Using StatCrunch, calculate the chi-square statistic and degrees of freedom for the following set of data for 180 people undergoing a knee replacement treatment with a ...
when is there statistical significance

Slide 1
not statistically significant. Among members receiving the letter, over 80% in both groups reported that the letter was ve. ry/somewhat easy to understand. About one-third of members heard about FTC closing from someone on their care team. Differences between the two groups (moved to One Care vs …
how to tell if statistically significant

Statistical Versus Clinical Significance in Psychiatry
In such a case, the difference of 1.4 kg obtained in the sample could be considered statistically not significant. Conversely, if the probability is less than 0.05, then it could be considered ...
not statistically significant means

[DOC File]Notes on Writing Chapter 3 - B W Griffin
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_30713f.html
There was a statistically significant difference, at the .05 level, in SAT verbal scores between females and males. There were no statistical differences, however, in SAT mathematics scores or grade point averages between the sexes. Descriptive statistics in Table 2 show that females scored higher on the SAT verbal subscale than did males.
statistically significant difference

[DOC File]β-blockers in Heart Failure
https://info.5y1.org/statistically-significant-vs-not-significant_1_afc958.html
The original primary endpoint of all-cause mortality (changed to co-primary endpoint due to inadequate sample size and power) was also lower with carvedilol (12% vs. 15%), but not statistically significant compared to placebo.
statistically significant but not meaningful

Statistically significant vs not significant