ࡱ> Root Entry F=RQWordDocument$)RObjectPoolwX2PwX2PSummaryInformation(l >!"#%&'()*;,-./0123456789:<+=?sABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijkmnopqrtuvwxyz՜.+,0HPlt|  Ernst & Young, LLPH 1Tariffs and Taxes: Understanding the DifferencesOh+'00 LX    1Tariffs and Taxes: Understanding the DifferencesErnst & Young LLP Normal.dotErnst & Young LLP6Microsoft Word for Windows 95@@d,-./0123456789:ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijkmnopqr|}~ܥhc $e0Rt)<<BBBBB4E*CfEEEEE"E.Q1TFjF(FFFFFFnJpJpJpJ0JtKHL_QXQffLBFFFFFfLFBBFEFFFFBFBFnJ=RQB&B@*B&PB@BBFnJFF EMBED PowerPoint.Slide.7  Tariffs and Consumption Taxes: Understanding the Differences* By: Robert J. Cline** Ernst & Young LLP Economics Consulting and Quantitative Analysis July 26, 1999 *This study is the second in a series prepared for the eCommerce Coalition, a broad-based, national coalition dedicated to providing sound policy information on electronic commerce taxation. The first study in the series is The Sky Is Not Falling: Why State and Local Revenues Were Not Significantly Impacted by the Internet in 1998. The study can be found at http://www.ey.com/publicate/ecommerce/pdf/sky.pdf. The Coalition members include America Online, Inc., Andersen Consulting LLP, Bank One, Cisco Systems, Inc., Citibank, N.A., First Data Corporation, Intuit, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Time Warner, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Inquiries concerning the Coalition should be made to Joseph R. Crosby, Ernst & Youngs National Director of State and Local Tax Legislative Services. Mr. Crosbys phone number is 202/327-5817 and his email address is joseph.crosby@ey.com. **Robert J. Cline is Ernst &Youngs National Director of State and Local Tax Policy Economics. Dr. Cline has extensive state and local tax policy and research experience having served as Tax Research Director in the Michigan Department of Management and Budget and in the Minnesota Department of Revenue. Dr. Cline has directed tax policy analysis, tax modeling projects, state and local fiscal studies, and economic impact studies for public and private-sector clients in 25 states. Dr. Clines phone number is 202/327-7829 and email address is robert.cline@ey.com. Tariffs and Consumption Taxes: Understanding the Differences Introduction In his presentation to the U.S. Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce on June 22, U.S. Trade Representative Donald Abelson reiterated the U.S. commitment to a duty-free cyberspace for electronic commerce. He was careful to explain that duty-free does not mean tax-free as far as a countrys internal consumption taxes are concerned. Rather it means that tariffs on electronic transmissions should not be imposed at a countrys border. However, several questions and comments that followed his presentation indicated some confusion concerning the difference between duty-free electronic transmissions and the imposition of consumption taxes on ecommerce retail purchases in a country. This paper briefly highlights the important differences between duties or tariffs and internal consumption taxes. These differences are summarized in Table 1. Tariffs A tariff is a tax applied to selected categories of imports that is designed to raise revenue for central governments and generally to provide a competitive advantage for domestic businesses. Tariffs are similar to excise taxes (taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, for example) in design and economic impact. Tariffs, normally imposed as a fixed percent of the value of imports, are designed to discriminate against selected imports, such as textiles or sugar, by raising the price of imports relative to domestic prices for the same products. The tariff or duty is collected at points of entry of products into a country. Since World War II, multilateral trade negotiations under the General Agreement on TariffAGE 4  /= : retail sales ly same rules apply as with non- E PAGE 4  /=/= 14%ceij 1 8 Ietu3Puvf|5;hwb%|%''.,8,<,H,{,|,`.a.3/4/////0000 000-0.0/0001020304060uPaP uDPbcUbc uDPUcVcVUc uDYZ;KuDYZ;acvKuDM!"#$%Dcdeij|}~wxMN $ $ $ $ $P 48h' / 0 1 9 : GHIde  23;OP$ $ $ $  $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ l H$l H$ )*XYabwefl H$l H$ l H$l H$fghi{|;!ObjInfo CompObjIj  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEGJ FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.69qn$- - y0 0 0       yI#-1 !"#$%Dcdeij|}~tuJK.6K%T :`astY"Z"'-$ $ $ $ $ $P$P$ $ $ $P$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $$$$$ $   $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $  600 fE00 UnknownErnst & Young LLPbrucerei Ernst & Young LLPbrucerei6U Ernst & Young LLPbrucerei6UEllen Fishbein-: !!Armalt),-Robert J. Cline!C:\projects\Tariffs and Taxes.docRobert J. Clinex\\$NDS\.WASH_TAEG_01_SYS1.TAEG.1225.WASH.EST.US\HOME\POLICY\ECommerce Coalition\Drafts\Tariffs and Consumption Taxes.docRobert J. Clinex\\$NDS\.WASH_TAEG_01_SYS1.TAEG.1225.WASH.EST.US\HOME\POLICY\ECommerce Coalition\Drafts\Tariffs and Consumption Taxes.docRobert J. Clinex\\$NDS\.WASH_TAEG_01_SYS1.TAEG.1225.WASH.EST.US\HOME\POLICY\ECommerce Coalition\Drafts\Tariffs and Consumption Taxes.docRobin D. McCullough-Harlin\\\WASH_TAEG_01\SYS1\HOME\POLICY\ECommerce Coalition\Drafts\Tariffs and Consumption Taxes.docRobert J. Clinex\\$NDS\.WASH_TAEG_01_SYS1.TAEG.1225.WASH.EST.US\HOME\POLICY\ECommerce Coalition\Drafts\Tariffs and Consumption Taxes.docRobert J. Clinex\\$NDS\.WASH_TAEG_01_SYS1.TAEG.1225.WASH.EST.US\HOME\POLICY\ECommerce Coalition\Drafts\Tariffs and Consumption Taxes.docErnst & Young LLPZC:\My Documents\Joe's Files\Clients & Coalitions\eCommerce Coalition\Tariffs and Taxes.doc@HP 4Si\\Wash_gen_03\6108_hp4siHPPCL5MSHP 4SiHP 4Si@w XX@MSUDOHP LaserJet 4Si<d HP 4Si@w XXDocumentSummaryInformation8_995793241 q{;QwX2P@Ҋ2POle HPIC FL@MSUDOHP LaserJet 4Si<d  c c  V UV# V`%-1  cds{|./  .JK$%ST  (0P-:L^_`astY"Z"s)t),,--- - - - --------0 .0d/0v0010205 30 403OP  ) * X Y60 C0D0 /E0We0f0b g0w h0i0j0 k0`ahi{|l0a%m0{,// 0 0n0s0u0v0w0x0 0 0 001Times New Roman Symbol &Arial"1h7F8S8FS8F#."H!f0Tariffs and Taxes: Understanding the DifferencesErnst & Young LLPErnst & Young LLPܥhc e0)Rt)<<BBBBB4E*CfEEEEE"E:Q1TFjF(FFFFFFJJJJ0JKlLkQXQfLBFFFFFLFBBFEFFFF:BFBFJgGQB&B@*B&PB@BBFJFF EMBED PowerPoint.Slide.7  Tariffs and Consumption Taxes: Understanding the Differences* By: Robert J. Cline** Ernst & Young LLP Economics Consulting and Quantitative Analysis July 26, 1999 *This study is the second in a series prepared for the eCommerce Coalition, a broad-based, national coalition dedicated to providing sound policy information on electronic commerce taxation. The first study in the series is The Sky Is Not Falling: Why State and Local Revenues Were Not Significantly Impacted by the Internet in 1998. The study can be found at http://www.ey.com/publicate/ecommerce/pdf/sky.pdf. The Coalition members include America Online, Inc., Andersen Consulting LLP, Bank One, Cisco Systems, Inc., Citibank, N.A., First Data Corporation, Intuit, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Time Warner, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Inquiries concerning the Coalition should be made to Joseph R. Crosby, Ernst & Youngs National Director of State and Local Tax Legislative Services. Mr. Crosbys phone number is 202/327-5817 and his email address is joseph.crosby@ey.com. **Robert J. Cline is Ernst &Youngs National Director of State and Local Tax Policy Economics. Dr. Cline has extensive state and local tax policy and research experience having served as Tax Research Director in the Michigan Department of Management and Budget and in the Minnesota Department of Revenue. Dr. Cline has directed tax policy analysis, tax modeling projects, state and local fiscal studies, and economic impact studies for public and private-sector clients in 25 states. Dr. Clines phone number is 202/327-7829 and email address is robert.cline@ey.com. Tariffs and Consumption Taxes: Understanding the Differences Introduction In his presentation to the U.S. Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce on June 22, U.S. Trade Representative Donald Abelson reiterated the U.S. commitment to a duty-free cyberspace for electronic commerce. He was careful to explain that duty-free does not mean tax-free as far as a countrys internal consumption taxes are concerned. Rather it means that tariffs on electronic transmissions should not be imposed at a countrys border. However, several questions and comments that followed his presentation indicated some confusion concerning the difference between duty-free electronic transmissions and the imposition of consumption taxes on ecommerce retail purchases in a country. This paper briefly highlights the important differences between duties or tariffs and internal consumption taxes. These differences are summarized in Table 1. Tariffs A tariff is a tax applied to selected categories of imports that is designed to raise revenue for central governments and generally to provide a competitive advantage for domestic businesses. Tariffs and Trade (GATT) have resulted in large reductions in tariff and nontariff barriers to international trade. A guiding principle for liberalizing international trade in goods and services has been the eventual elimination of all tariffs on imports. The U.S. support for duty-free cyberspace is consistent with this objective. Domestic Consumption Taxes In contrast to tariffs, consumption taxes, such as retail sales taxes in the U.S. and value-added taxes (VAT) in the European Union, are mainstays of federal tax systems in all developed countries. These consumption taxes are designed to tax purchases in the state or country where final consumption takes place, not where goods are produced. To achieve tax neutrality and avoid distorting consumer choices, consumption taxes must impose the same tax burden on purchases made by consumers regardless of the suppliers location. The following sections explain how tax neutrality is achieved under a VAT and a retail sales tax and compares these consumption taxes to tariffs. Table 1 Tariffs vs. Sales and Use Taxes TariffsSales and Use TaxesImposed by national governments (1 U.S. jurisdiction)Imposed by state and local jurisdictions (over 6,500 jurisdictions within the U.S.)Imposed at the border on the importation of foreign goodsGenerally imposed at the place of consumption upon a retail sale of tangible personal property and taxable servicesDesigned to disadvantage importsDesigned to impose a uniform tax on goods and taxable services at the place of consumption regardless of where they originatePrimary purpose is to fulfill national trade policy, only secondarily to raise revenuePurpose is to raise general revenues for state and local governmentsNexus for taxation is irrelevantIf the retailer has no nexus in the jurisdiction, the retailer has no duty to collect or remit sales or use taxPublic policy of neutrality and free movement of goods across borders would favor eliminating tariffsPublic policy of neutrality requires applying them equally to all retail sales Ecommerce: Physical delivery: generally same rules apply as with non ecommerce trade; some difficulty with categorizing and valuing digital products for importation purposesEcommerce: Physical delivery: direct marketing analogy for out-of-state vendors without nexus; difficulties with categorizing digital products as taxable goodsElectronic delivery: Difficult to determine when goods are imported and to enforce compliance at "border crossings"Electronic delivery: Difficult to determine the jurisdiction where consumers are located or where transactions occur and to enforce compliance Value-Added Taxes For trade between EU countries, tax border adjustments are used to ensure that the same VAT is paid by consumers on imported or domestically supplied products. This neutral tax treatment is achieved by refunding any VAT on exported products and applying the importing countrys VAT rate on imports. The net effect is to tax imports at the same tax rate paid by consumers on goods purchased from domestic suppliers. The border adjustments are designed to eliminate both over- or under-taxation of international trade. In other words, they are designed to avoid either higher selected taxes or subsidies on imported goods. It is important to understand that the VAT tax on imported goods is not a tariff. It is a fundamental component of a uniform value-added tax that is needed to impose the same tax on imported and domestic goods. In fact, if the VAT were rebated on exports and not imposed on imports, this tax-free treatment would provide a subsidy to imports that would put domestic producers at a competitive disadvantage. It should also be noted that the same imports subject to a VAT may also be subject to separate tariffs or custom duties. Even with the complete elimination of tariffs among EU countries, the VAT would still be collected on all imports to achieve tax neutrality and ensure a level tax playing field for both foreign and domestic firms. Sales and Use Taxes Within the U.S., states are constitutionally prohibited from restricting interstate commerce by imposing tariffs or discriminatory taxes on imports into a state. As a result interstate trade is already occurring in a tariff-free environment, the trade objective being pursued within the EU and for international trade among all countries. The sale and use tax, the largest single source of tax revenues for state and local governments in the United States, is also a destination-based consumption tax. Similar to the EU valued-added system, individual states impose use taxes (at rates equivalent to the sales tax) on taxable purchases made by resident consumers from out-of-state sellers, while simultaneously exempting sales made to other states from the sales tax. The net effect of these two adjustments is similar to the economic effect of VAT border adjustments: residents of a state pay the same sales tax rate on taxable purchases whether supplied by in-state or out-of-state firms. Without a corresponding use tax on taxable purchases from out-of-state firms, the sales and use tax system would provide a subsidy for imports and discriminate against in-state businesses. As is the case with VAT border adjustments, the use tax is not a tariff on out-of-state purchases; it is a fundamental component of the sales and use tax system needed to ensure neutral taxation of final consumption. Taxation of Remote Sales The United States and the EU, as well as other international organizations including the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, are searching for fair and cost-effective ways to impose consumption taxes on ecommerce retail transactions. Whether it is a retail sales and use tax or a VAT system, the tax policy challenge is the same: to develop a neutral, cost-effective approach to taxing cross-border retail sales that imposes a uniform tax burden on all taxable purchases whether supplied by domestic (in-state) or foreign (out-of-state) suppliers. Intangible products (such as electronic versions of computer software programs or books) purchased over the Internet from remote sellers (foreign or out-of-state firms) provide the same challenges to the effective enforcement of value-added or retail sales taxes. In fact, similar responses are being debated in the U.S. and the EU. The EU is considering a system that would, in effect, impose a VAT tax collection responsibility on firms located outside of the EU selling intangible (virtual) goods and services via the Internet to individual consumers within the EU. However, the question of how to impose this collection responsibility on domestic consumers or foreign sellers is similar to the question of how to effectively collect state use taxes on out-of-state, remote sales. In summary, both the VAT and the retail sales tax systems must be adapted to the new technology of Internet ecommerce. To be effective, these consumption tax systems must: 1) avoid restrictions on cross-border ecommerce transactions, and 2) impose uniform tax rates on consumers taxable irrespective of the location of sellers. This outcome requires both a duty-free and tax-neutral international and interstate tax and trade system.  U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Tax Policy, Selected Tax Policy Implications of Global Electronic Commerce, November 1996, highlights the importance of a neutral tax system that imposes the same taxes on income from international ecommerce that are applied to similar domestic business activities. The report also notes that the guiding principle of tax neutrality requires that no new taxes, unique to ecommerce, be imposed on income related to Internet transactions.  The actual border adjustments used among EU countries are more complicated in that there are different treatments for cross-border sales of goods and services and for sales to businesses and final consumers. For a detailed discussion of ecommerce VAT tax issues, see Howard Lambert, VAT and Electronic Commerce: European Union Insights Into the Challenges Ahead, Tax Notes International, November 23, 1998. Ps are similar to excise taxes (taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, for example) in design and economic impact. Tariffs, normally imposed as a fixed percent of the value of imports, are designed to discriminate against selected imports, such as textiles or sugar, by raising the price of imports relative to domestic prices for the same products. The tariff or duty is collected at points of entry of products into a country. Since World War II, multilateral trade negotiations under the General Agreement on TariffAGE 4  /= : retail sales ly same rules apply as with non- E PAGE 4  /=/=%ceij 1 8 Ietu3Puvf|5;hwb%|%''.,8,<,H,{,|,`.a.3/4/////0000 000-0.0/0001020304060uPaP uDPbcUbc uDPUcVcVUc uDYZ;KuDYZ;acvKuDMMETA  Header 9CompObjuText_Content !"#$%Dcdeij|}~wxMN $ $ $ $ $P 48h'SS,@b3P7o4(d PT 4  @@``@T 4@`0@T 4  AAaaBT 4 @`@L <"ArialL <"ArialL <Times New RomanL <"ArialL <Times New RomanL <EYL <Times New RomanL <Times New Roman$)B* $b$b$P$f$P@dZ@dZ@dZ@5dZ@dZbbPfPAdZAdZAdZA5dZAdZ b b P f P@dZ(@dZ(@dZ(@5dZ(@dZ(bbPfPdddddd5ddddbbPfP@dZ@dZ@dZ@5dZ@dZbbPfP5bbPfP5bbPfP5bbPfP5   ( 800t:nPbD$42@dZ35//0011 tD %`p H./04x$X(=^  (`p  800b ,  b (3Pa 800b :nPbD  H./04x$X(=^  (tD 800b    (s 800bR:nPb"$.9~5TARIFFS AND CONSUMPTION TAXES: UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES By: Robert J. Cline Ernst & Young Economics Consulting and Quantitative Analysis July 26, 1999//=bbb^b00 4@dd4@dd4@dd 4@dd4@dd4@dd4@dd4@dd4@dd4@dd4@dd=4@dd4@dd 4@dd11X  (pF 800b:nPb\$)42@dZ35//0011 tD b$7̙33$73$73333f$7999MMM$7f$7f3$73 H./04x$X(=^  (tD 800b  = b (3P` @  800b:nPbe$@}   5*</,/,bX0H04,dd(11, = b (3P``   800b:nPbe$@} f  5*</,/0bX0H040dd(110 = b (3P`   800b:nPbe$@}   5*</,/4bX0H044dd(114  ( <  800 :nPb  ( H 800 (nPb % (   800:nPbe$Qd   5e</,/ :bX0H04 :@dZ(11 :  [;P   (p|8 800b :nPb  (t|< 800b :nPb  (x|@ 800b :nPb  (||D 800b :nPb  (|H 800b :nPb '`p 9PH./04x$X(=^  (`p  800b 0  =  b (3P`P 800b nPbe$`tP 5*</,/B bX0H04Bdd(11B = b (3P`x P 800b nPbe$`l P 5*</,/F bX0H04Fdd(11F = b (3P 800b nP#be$#t 5*</,/(M bX0H04(Mdd(11(M = b (3Px  800b nP#be$#l  5*</,/(Q bX0H04(Qdd(11(Q  b (3Pa 800bD `p b4x$X(=^  (`p  800b 4  =  b (3P`P 800b nPbe$`tP 5*</,/X bX0H04X@dZ(11X = b (3P`x P 800b nPbe$`l P 5*</,/\ bX0H04\@dZ(11\ = b (3P 800b nP#be$#t 5*</,/` bX0H04`@dZ(11` = b (3Px  800b nP#be$#l  5*</,/d bX0H04d@dZ(11dH./0 D _VBA_PROJECT04YdYdeded0@hb (3Px  800b nP#be$#l  5*</,/d bX0H04d@dZ(11dH./0 D _VBA_PROJECT04YdYdeded0@hBy: Robert J. Cline Ernst & Young Economics Consulting and Quantitative Analysis July 26, 1999 ng Economics Consulting and Quantitative Analysis June 18, 1999  q{;QMicrosoft PowerPoint SlideMSPresentationPowerPoint.Slide.79qMicrosoft (R) PowerPoint (R) Windows _5%1 @&]5 &&TNPPb=Pid & TNPP &&TNPP  ] @ p "---  =]Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-. - }]EY-.   2 3ec &- 7C C ;C $C @C &Times New Roman-.   2 s TARIFFS AND69:11-9::Times New Roman-.   "2 >CONSUMPTION TAXES::>:-9L15>;5::5,Times New Roman-.   "2  UNDERSTANDING THE:::5:,69:: 9?5>5Times New Roman-.   2 e DIFFERENCES:115:5::5-Times New Roman-Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-.    2 KBy:0 Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-.   2 Robert J. Cline4$( $4( Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-.   @2 &Ernst & Young Economics Consulting and0 (<4$(($0!$($< 4$((($$()Times New Roman-.   '2 2Quantitative Analysis8($($$ 4($%Times New Roman-. Times New Roman-.   2  July 26, 1999$($$$$$$$&TNPP &--"Systemn-L5%1  / 0 1 9 : GHIde  23;OP$ $ $ $  $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ l H$l H$ )*XYabwefl H$l H$ l H$l H$fghi{|;!