ࡱ> @ -`bjbjFF ,,XLLLLLLL````8`da`bbbbbcccbdddddd$ٍR+L}ccLLbb"LbLbbbLLbb PMO4`:"d0Ð\Ð``LLLLÐL|cn lsdy ccc``[$^dl``$^SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m. Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 EN BANC Bailiff: Heather Fredricksen 06SA118 (1 HOUR) Petitioner-Appellee: CITY OF FORT MORGAN, v. Respondents-Appellants: THE COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, COMMISSIONER GREGORY E. SOPKIN, COMMISSIONER POLLY PAGE, and COMMISSIONER CARL MILLER, and Intervenors-Appellants: KN WATTENBERG TRANSMISSION, L.L.C., LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, and CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION.))))))))))))))))) )))))))))))))))))))))For the Petitioner-Appellee: Dudley P. Spiller Ryley Carlock & Applewhite and Eric C. Jorgensen For the Respondents-Appellants Public Utilities Commission, Commissioner Gregory E. Sopkin, Commissioner Polly Page and Commissioner Carl Miller: John W. Suthers Attorney General David A. Beckett Department of Law Business and Licensing Section For the Intervenor-Appellant KN Wattenberg Transmission, LLC: Michael L. Beatty Michael Noone Beatty & Wozniak, P.C. For the Intervenors-Appellants Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation and Leprino Foods Company: Leanne B. De Vos Sherman & Howard, LLC For Amicus Curiae The Colorado Association of Municipal Utilities and The Colorado Municipal League in Support of the City of Fort Morgan: Wm. Kelley Dude Anderson Dude & Lebel, P.C. and Geoffrey T. Wilson Colorado Municipal League Appeal from District Court, Morgan County, 04CV301 Docketed: April 14, 2006 At Issue: November 9, 2006 issues contd on next page 06SA118 issues contd from previous page ISSUE(S): Issues for Intervenors-Appellants Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (Formerly known as Excel Corporation) and Leprino Foods Company: Did the Commission regularly pursue its authority, reach a just and reasonable decision, and make conclusions in accordance with the evidence when it issued a CPCN to KNW, having determined Fort Morgans refusal to provide substantially adequate service to meet Excel and Leprinos business needs? Excel and Leprino agree with and adopt the statement of other issues presented on appeal in the Opening Brief of Intervenor/Appellant KN Wattenberg Transmission, L.L.C. Issues for Intervernor-Appellant KN Wattenberg Transmission, L.L.C.: Did the PUC regularly pursue its jurisdictional authority when it granted a CPCN to KNW regulating its rates, services, and facilities and allowing continued firm transportation of interstate gas to two industrial customers located within the City of Fort Morgan (City), where KNWs facilities had been lawfully constructed and operated, pursuant to orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and where the FERC had made a conditional hand-off of regulatory oversight to the PUC pursuant to the Hinshaw Amendment of the Natural Gas Act? When the PUC has determined that firm transportation service is a distinct and necessary service, is essential to two industrial customers, and is not being provided by a home rule municipality, does the PUC have constitutional authority to grant a CPCN authorizing that service within the municipality? Did the PUC properly exercise its authority in making a decision to grant a CPCN to KNW by conducting proceedings to determine if firm transportation service is a standard industry offering and whether a municipal utility in a home rule city was unwilling or unable to offer that service? Where a pipeline is constructed under valid federal authority and where no franchise was required because construction would not cross any city streets, alleys or property, can the City prevent operation of the pipeline? Was the PUCs decision to exercise regulation over KNWs facilities, rates and services just and reasonable, and in accordance with the evidence? issues contd on next page 06SA118 issues contd from previous page Issues for Respondents-Appellants Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Commissioner Gregory E. Sopkin, Commissioner Polly Page and Commissioner Carl Miller: Did the PUC act within its authority set forth in article XXV of the Colorado Constitution when it awarded a CPCN authorizing a public utility to provide service to customers located in a municipality, which municipality owned and operated a municipal utility? Whether, in the PUCs exercise of its regulatory authority, it was correct for the PUC to invoke the doctrine of regulated monopoly to determine if the service offered by the incumbent municipal utility was substantially inadequate? May the PUC review the tariffs of a municipal utility without running afoul of the prohibition against impermissible interference with municipal property or functions that is set forth at article V 35 of the Colorado Constitution? Did the district court misinterpret the Public Utilities Law in concluding that a permit was a condition precedent for KNW to be awarded a CPCN? Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:00 a.m. EN BANC 05SC682 (1/2 HOUR) Petitioner: TERRENCE T. HODGES, v. Respondent: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. ))))))))))) )For the Petitioner: Jonathan D. Reppucci Jonathan D. Reppucci, LLC For the Respondent: John W. Suthers Attorney General Cheryl Canaday Appellate Division Criminal Appeals Unit Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 03CA0018 Docketed: September 19, 2005 At Issue: December 20, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the court of appeals erred in interpreting C.R.S. 21-2-101(1). Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:30 a.m. EN BANC 05SC519 (1 HOUR) Petitioner/Cross-Respondent: CHRISTOPHER SILVA, v. Respondent/Cross-Petitioner: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. ))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))For the Petitioner/Cross-Respondent: Christopher Silva Pro Se For the Respondent/Cross-Petitioner: John W. Suthers Attorney General Laurie A. Booras Appellate Division Criminal Justice Section (Amici to participate in oral argument for Petitioner) For Amicus Curiae Colorado State Public Defender: Douglas K. Wilson Colorado State Public Defender Kathleen A. Lord Deputy State Public Defender Shann Jeffrey Deputy State Public Defender For Amicus Curiae Colorado Criminal Defense Bar: Kim Dvorchak and Michelle Lazar and Jonathan D. Reppucci Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 04CA0661 Docketed: July 26, 2005 At Issue: November 2, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether Petitioner has a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in pursuit of postconviction relief, and thus effective assistance of counsel under the Due Process and Equal Protections Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. II, section 25 of the Colorado Constitution. issues contd on next page 05SC519 issues contd from previous page Whether the Colorado Court of Appeals erred in not reaching the merits of Petitioners other claims raised in his appeal of the denial of his application for postconviction relief under Crim.P. Rule 35(c) and not remanding those claims to the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Crim. P. 35(c)(3)(IV). Whether a due process violation can arise from the simple appointment of postconviction counsel with a conflict of interest that the trial court should have known about. SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 1:30 p.m. Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 EN BANC Bailiff: Jessica Schmidt 06SA272 (1 HOUR) In re: Plaintiff: J.A. WALKER CO, INC., a Colorado corporation, v. Defendants: 450 SEVENTEENTH, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; 450 COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; REGENT TERRACE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; CAMBRIA CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation; 450 AMIGAS UNIDAS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; EXCEL METELS, INC., a Colorado corporation; READY MIXED CONCRETE COMPANY, a Colorado corporation; REDD IRON, INC., a Colorado Corporation; URBAN MARKET DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Colorado corporation; GUARANTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a Colorado banking corporation; L & W SUPPLY CORPORATION, d/b/a BUILDING SPECIALTIES, INC.; CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado; THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER; CHRISTINE H. OWEN, an individual; and STEPHEN L. OWEN, an individual, BRUNDAGE-BONE CONCRETE PUMPING COLORADO INC., a Colorado corporation.)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))For the Plaintiff: Rocco A. Dodson Dodson & Associates, P.C. For the Defendants Urban Market Development, LLC; 450 Seventeenth, LLC; Regent Terrace, LLC; 450 Company, LLC; Christine Owen and Stephen Owen: Chad M. McShane Robinson, Waters & ODorisio, P.C. For the Defendant Ready Mixed Concrete Company: Mark D. Gruskin Jeffrey R. Pretty Senn Visciano Kirschenbaum, P.C. For the Defendant Brundage-Bone Concrete Pumping Colorado, Inc.: Carrie A. Rodgers Angela D. DeVine Moye White, LLP For the Defendant Cambria Corporation: Robert R. Miller Stettner, Miller and Cohn, P.C. For the Defendant Redd Iron Inc.: Joseph A. Murr Susan A. Kraemer Bloom Murr & Accomazzo, P.C. Original Proceeding, District Court, City & County of Denver, 06CV1765 Docketed: August 29, 2006 At Issue: October 23, 2006 issues contd on next page 06SA272 issues contd from previous page ISSUE(S): Whether the trial court committed an abuse of discretion and abdicated its jurisdiction by ordering Walker and Cambria to arbitrate their dispute, when the uncontradicted evidence before the court was that the agreement to arbitrate was fraudulently induced. Whether the trial court committed an abuse of discretion and abdicated its jurisdiction by ordering Walker and Cambria to arbitrate their dispute when only 450 filed the Motion to Compel Arbitration, and Walker had no contract with 450? Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:30 p.m. EN BANC 06SA240 (1 HOUR) In re: Plaintiffs: CHRIS and CINDY INGOLD, v. Defendants: AIMCO/BLUFFS, L.L.C. APARTMENTS d/b/a BOULDER CREEK APARTMENTS, AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P. and JAMES R. MACIAS, and JOHN DOES 1-5. ))))))))))))))For the Plaintiffs: Chris Ingold Irwin & Boesen, P.C. For the Defendants: Jon F. Sands Brad Ramming Fisher, Sweetbaum, Levin & Sands, P.C. Original Proceeding, District Court, Boulder County, 04CV1225 Docketed: August 1, 2006 At Issue: November 20, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the court had to determine the validity of the alleged underlying contract before compelling arbitration, since no portion of the Original Uniform Act gives powers to the arbitrator to determine the enforceability of any provision of an alleged contract. Whether the nonwaiver provision of the Security Deposit Act barred the arbitration ordered by the court. Whether the court should have found that the Intertwining Doctrine barred arbitration. SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m. Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 EN BANC Bailiff: Clare Salmo 06SA199 (1 HOUR) CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF JOHN AND BEVERLY TONKO, IN FREMONT COUNTY, COLORADO Applicants-Appellants: JOHNNY F. TONKO and DONNA TONKO, v. Opposers-Appellees: CHARLES MALLOW, CITY OF FLORENCE, TOWN OF COAL CREEK, TOWN OF WILLIAMSBURG, TOWN OF ROCKVALE, PHILIP KESSLER, NAOMI KESSLER, and STEVEN J. WITTE, Division Engineer, Water Division 2.)))))))))))))))))))For the Applicants-Appellants: Linda McMillan Shaw & Quigg, P.C. For the Opposers-Appellees: Julianne M. Woldridge MacDougall, Woldridge & Worley, P.C.  Appeal from the District Court, Water Division 2, 01CW95 Docketed: June 19, 2006 At Issue: December 4, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the court erred in finding that applicants were collaterally estopped from presenting evidence regarding the historic use of the subject water rights. Whether the Water Court erred by granting opposers Motion for Summary Judgment. Whether the water court erred in finding that applicants water rights were not historically used for decreed purposes when there was no place of use specified in the decree. Whether a practical effect of the water courts ruling is that a District Court has now, in essence, determined the existence of a water right creating a precedent for District Courts to make such rulings in the future. Whether the water court erred in finding that Applicant-Appellants claim lacked substantial factual support, legal support and justification and thus erred in awarding attorneys fees. Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:00 a.m. EN BANC 06SC71 (1/2 HOUR) Petitioner: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, v. Respondent: JUAN R. RAMIREZ. )))))))))))))For the Petitioner: John W. Suthers Attorney General Jennifer M. Smith Assistant Attorney General Appellate Division Criminal Justice Section For the Respondent: Douglas K. Wilson Colorado State Public Defender Alan Kratz Deputy State Public Defender Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 03CA1600 Docketed: February 24, 2006 At Issue: December 26, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the expert testimony of a certified pediatric nurse practitioner should have been admitted at trial where the expert testified her finding was suspicious and acknowledged she had not reached a conclusion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Whether the court of appeals decision to require the trial court to change the jury instruction on sexual assault on remand was incorrect in light of this Courts decision in People v. Vigil, 127P.3d 916, 04SC352 (Colo. Jan. 23, 2006). SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m. Oral Argument: Thursday, January 25, 2007 EN BANC Bailiff: Toni Wehman 02SA365 (2 HOURS) Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, v. Defendant: EDWARD MONTOUR, JR. ))))))))))))))))) )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))For the Plaintiff: Carol A. Chambers John Topolnicki Paul Wolff Office the District Attorney 18th Judicial District and Susan J. Trout Special Deputy District Attorney and First Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General For the Defendant: Judy L. Lucero and Esteban A. Martinez Martinez Law, LLC For Amicus Curiae Colorado District Attorneys Council: David J. Thomas Colorado District Attorneys Council and Donna Skinner Reed Chief Appellate Deputy District Attorney 1st Judicial District For Amicus Curiae Colorado Criminal Defense Bar (granted permission to argue on January 10, 2007): David Lane Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP For Amicus Curiae Colorado State Public Defender: Douglas K. Wilson State Public Defender Jason C. Middleton Deputy State Public Defender contd on next page contd from previous page For Amicus Curiae Office of the Attorney General (joined in brief filed by District Attorney): John W. Suthers Attorney General Paul E. Koehler Assistant Attorney General Appellate Division Criminal Justice Section Appeal from District Court, Douglas County, 02CR782 Docketed: December 23, 2002 At Issue: December 29, 2006 ISSUE(S): Independent Review Issues: Whether the record of the trial court proceedings and sentencing hearing is sufficient to support the death sentence under Colorado law or the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? Whether Colorados death penalty scheme, which authorizes a death sentence without adversarial testing and permits a capital defendant to, in effect, direct a sentence of death, violates Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), and the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? Whether the trial court violated Colorado law and federal due process in failing to reach the death verdict in the same manner a jury is required to determine its verdict, as required by Section 18-1.3-1201(2.5). Whether Sections 18-1.3-401(5) and 18-1.3-1201 (6), (7) and (8) violate due process, equal protection, the right to a jury trial under Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and/or the Colorado Constitution by providing disparate relief for capital defendants whose death sentences are vacated or reversed on appeal? Whether Colorados death penalty statute creates a substantial risk race will enter into capital prosecution, permitting the death penalty to be disproportionately imposed on minorities convicted of killing white persons in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article II, Sections 16 and 25 of the Colorado Constitution? issues contd on next page 02SA365 issues contd from previous page Whether Colorado statutes governing the execution of a human being are so vague they violate due process and give rise to the exercise of unfettered discretion by prison officials, resulting in cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and like provisions under the Colorado Constitution. Colorado Const. Art. II, Sec. 20? Whether the unitary review scheme for the review of death sentences violates due process, equal protection and the Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and/or the Colorado Constitution? Whether the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution prohibit the State of Colorado from sentencing any person to death absent grand jury indictment? Direct Appeal Issues: Whether section 18-1.3-1201(1)(a), C.R.S., which mandates judicial determination of death-eligibility of a capital defendant who forgoes a jury trial or pleads guilty, violates the right to jury determination as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)? Whether judicial determination of death-eligibility and selection of penalty created by Section 18-1.3-1201(1)(a), C.R.S.- which forces a capital defendant who forgoes a jury trial or pleads guilty to surrender the right to jury sentencing- violates due process, equal protection and the Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and equivalent provisions of the Colorado Constitution? Whether section 18-1.3-1201(2)(a) C.R.S. violates the Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the Colorado Constitutions prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment by requiring the sentencing authority to consider mitigation as part of the death-eligibility determination? SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 1:30 p.m. Oral Argument: Thursday, January 25, 2007 EN BANC Bailiff: Paul Kyed 05SC849 (1 HOUR) Petitioner: THE DENVER FOUNDATION, v. Respondent: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ))))))))))))))))For the Petitioner: Christopher Lane Bridget K. Sullivan Sherman & Howard, LLC For the Respondent: Marc D. Flink Casie D. Collignon For Amici Curiae Colorado Bankers Association; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Valley Bank and Trust; Home State Bank; and First National Bank: Ted R. Sikora, II Victoria A. Johnson Davis Graham & Stubbs, LLP Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 04CA1403 Docketed: December 2, 2005 At Issue: December 11, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the prohibition in the Sterne-Elder Trust on invasion of principal precludes a transfer of the principal of that component Trust of the Foundation from Wells Fargo to the Foundations nonprofit corporation to be held as a part of the Foundations permanent endowment. Whether the court of appeals committed error when it imposed its own construction of the Foundations Declaration without showing that the Foundations construction was in bad faith or an abuse of discretion. Whether the Sterne-Elder Trust gives The Denver Foundation power to modify a restriction on distribution that is inconsistent with the charitable needs of the community. Is the Foundations exercise of that power limited to circumstances that the restriction would make it impossible, illegal or impractical to fulfill the purposes of the Trust. Whether the transfer of the principal of the Sterne-Elder Trust to the Foundations nonprofit corporation as a permanent endowment would cause a merger of all legal and equitable interests in the Trust that would terminate the Trust. Whether it was proper for the Probate Court to consider evidence on the evolution of the Foundation and on prior Wells Fargo transfers of Foundation component trusts to the corporate entity. Oral Argument: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:30 p.m. EN BANC 05SC763 (1/2 HOUR) Petitioner: ADALILIA ARTEAGA-LANSAW, v. Respondent: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.)))))))))))))For the Petitioner: Douglas K. Wilson Colorado State Public Defender Shann Jeffery Deputy State Public Defender For the Respondent: John W. Suthers Attorney General Jennifer M. Smith Assistant Attorney General Appellate Division Criminal Justice Section Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 03CA0881 Docketed: December 19, 2005 At Issue: November 2, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the admission of victim hearsay statements to police requires reversal. Oral Argument: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:00 p.m. EN BANC 05SC916 (1/2 HOUR) Petitioner: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, v. Respondent: CHARITY LEHNERT. )))))))))))For the Petitioner: John W. Suthers Attorney General Roger G. Billotte Assistant Attorney General Appellate Division Criminal Justice Section For the Respondent: Jonathan D. Reppucci Jonathan D. Reppucci, LLC Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 02CA2186 Docketed: December 30, 2005 At Issue: December 11, 2006 ISSUE(S): Whether the evidence was insufficient to show that the defendant took a substantial step toward murder, as required for conviction for attempted first-degree murder. PAGE 1 VYZ[\]^_`cqrs   * 6 C E F W X wwwjd hdCJh/hdCJ^JaJh/h/CJ^JaJh9-5CJ^JaJh/h/5CJ^JaJhVNhP2CJhVNhCJhVNh>iCJhVNhCCJhVNhdCJhVNhd&CJhVNhCB*phhVNh>iB*phhVNh)B*phhVNhdB*ph&c  % & ) * B C F X n $If 0<$*$If^<gd/ &d P `,`X ] m n _ ` a  ; > B H N O K L Ჹڹګvpvpv hn]@CJhVNhdCJhO%RhO%RCJ hO%RCJ hO%R5CJ h@CJh@h@CJ hJ;5CJ h@5CJ hn5CJ h] 5CJ h] CJ h'mCJ hd5CJ h'm5CJ h9-5CJhVNhd5CJhVNh/CJ h3wCJ h/CJ,n a q   # : ; L \ x $If^gd] $If^x | 6>_`akl$a$gdI$a$gd=]kd$$IflFZ$ZVL    4 lal $If^gdO%R&'56IJ^_aiklɿ~vn~~vcvZhI5CJaJh.hNV]CJaJh/CJaJhNV]CJaJhNV]>*CJaJh.hNV]>*CJaJhH>*CJaJh9->*CJaJhxg>*CJaJ hd>*CJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ hI>*CJhIhn]@5CJ h=5CJhIhI5CJ hICJhVNhdCJ hn]@CJ l<=mnmn!"* $ 0*$a$gdI 0*$gdNV]!"56JKLMVW]klǿǮ~uu~l~l~lu~c~uhVNhj[CJhVNhCCJhVNhdCJhVNhP2CJhVNhCJhVNhd&CJhVNhd>*CJhohNV]CJaJhNV]CJaJh9->*CJaJh9-CJaJhICJaJhIhI5CJaJh9-5CJaJh=5CJaJhI5CJaJhP_5CJaJ!*KLMWXYZ[\ &d P $&d P a$gd5 0*$gdNV] 0*$gd9- 0*$gdI $ 0*$a$gdI'(MNZ\p $If^$If 0$*$Ifgd&((MYZ[\op@HSeoƼ۶ն۝۶նۗۗۗۍ|qga h&(CJhVNh`>*CJhJ9h`CJaJ hd>*CJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ hiCJhVNh&(5CJhVNhO%RCJ hHCJ hO%RCJhVNhd5CJhVNhLNCJ hLNCJ hdCJhVNhdCJh&(h&(CJ^JaJh&(h&(5CJ^JaJ&If$&d P a$gd5Xkdz$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^2bcdxy 0$*$Ifgd&( &d P ')*+,.epy$%567HIOQcdtuvzttzmt hd5CJ hO%RCJ hO%R5CJ h,6;5CJhVNhd5CJhVNhLNCJ hLNCJ hdCJh&(h&(CJ^JaJh,6;5CJ^JaJh&(h&(5CJ^JaJhVNh4]CJhVNhP2CJhVNhd&CJ h5CJhVNhdCJhVNh&(CJ*7IPQv > P o $If^$If 0$*$Ifgd&( > P _ 2!3!c!k!v!!!!!!!"""""##0#$$6%7%8%9%;%<%%Ͽ{sϵlhhIOX hVNhdh0h`5h=%h`5CJaJh=5CJaJh^5CJaJhP_5CJaJh^CJaJh=%h`CJaJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ hiCJhVNhdCJh*Lh*LCJ hQ CJ hOCJ h*L5CJ hIOXCJ h*LCJ% ! !!!3!4!5!6!l!!!!!!" 6$gd`Xkd$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^gd*L $If^"""# #.#/#0#$$7%8%9%:%;%%%%%% & && 0$*$Ifgd:4 &d P  &d P gd5 6$gd` $ 6$a$gd^%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&& && &S&_&)))))))*****+*3*<*=*>*****+c++++1,S,,ƸƸ娡囕娡 hj+cCJ hd5CJ hj+c5CJ hdCJ h!:CJ h!:5CJhVNhd5CJ h!CJh:4h:45CJ^JaJh:4h:4CJ^JaJhVNhCJhVNhd&CJhVNhdCJhVNh4]CJhVNhP2CJ1&&& &N&O&R&S&_&`&))****+*****+/+A+b+c+++ $If^$If 0$*$Ifgd:4+++++,0,1,S,b,s,,,,,,-Xkdn$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^,,,,,,, ---)-*-R-S-T-U-]-`-/ /P/U/c/d/}//////////////0}}pbph:4h:45CJ^JaJh:4h:4CJ^JaJhVNh4]CJhVNhP2CJhVNhd&CJhJ;CJaJh`CJaJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ h=>*CJh=h=5CJ hd5CJ h=5CJ h!5CJ h=CJ hj+cCJhVNhdCJhj+chj+cCJ&--*-2-S-T-U-_-`-c.d.Q/R/S/T////////// 0$*$Ifgd:4 &d P $&d P a$gd5gd`$a$gd=//0000'0(0000000000011 1G1 $If^$If 0$*$Ifgd:40'000000000000111F1G1J11111111133333333333344ľѷĮۨۨۨ۞xxoxoxfhVNhd&CJhVNh4]CJhVNhP2CJh. h`OJQJh`OJQJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ h!:CJhLNhLNCJ hd5CJ hdCJ hLNCJ h!:5CJhVNhd5CJhVNhdCJh:4h:4CJ^JaJh:4h:45CJ^JaJ(G1H1I1J1111111122;3<33  0 *$gd`Xkd$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal333333334G4\4]4^4s4t444445555 0<$*$If^<gd:4 0$*$Ifgd:4 &d P $&d P a$gd544*4P4[4_4f4i4j4t444445+5555556 6666#6$68696?6G6O6P6Y6Z6[66666666777xhVNhp|>*CJhn|Jhn|JCJ hd5CJ hn|J5CJhVNhn|JCJ hdCJhVNhd5CJ hC<5CJ hi5CJ hn|JCJhn|JhdCJ^JaJh:4h:45CJ^JaJh:4h:4CJ^JaJhVNhCJhVNhdCJ.5*5+5556$6768696:6;6<6=6>6?6[6q666 $If^$If 0<$*$If^<gdn|J 0<$*$If^<gd:4666666777777888899N:gd`Xkdb$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal777M:N:Q:_:`:|:::::::::::::::::;);:;I;\;];l;m;;;;;;;D<¹°ª¹–ysysyly hd5CJ hdCJ hOCJhVNhd5CJhq^,hq^,CJ^JaJhq^,hq^,5CJ^JaJ hq^,CJ hLNCJhVNh4]CJhVNhCJhVNhdCJhVNhd&CJ hVNhdhJ9h`CJaJh`CJaJ hd>*CJhVNhd>*CJ'N:O:P:::::::::;;;;(;);:;;;I;];m; $If^$If $Ifgd:4 0$*$Ifgdq^, &d P $&d P a$gd5m;~;;;;;;;;<(<E<F<G<H<~<<<Xkd$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^D<E<u<}<<<<<<<<<<w>>>>>>>??????*?+?E?l?w?{???????øԙzqqhhhhVNh})CJhVNh(CJhVNhd&CJhVNhCCJhVNh4]CJhLN hVNhdhQ hd>*CJaJhQ hQ >*CJaJhQ hQ CJaJhVNhQ >*CJ hd>*CJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ hQ CJhVNhdCJhOhOCJ%<<<<<==>>>>>>?c?x?y?z??????? 0$*$Ifgd'm &d P $&d P a$gd$gdQ h]hgdQ ????????@ @)@1@2@3@D@E@T@U@_@`@|@}@@@@@@@@@@ A AAAA A[AA B BBNBúϣɣϣϣϣɣϰzs hn5CJ hd5CJhVNhQ CJ hQ CJh@I6h@I6CJH*hVNh@I6CJ h@I6CJ h@I65CJhVNhd5CJhVNhhCJ hhCJ hdCJhVNhdCJh'mh'm5CJaJh'mh'mCJ^JaJh'mh'm5CJ^JaJ*????????? @3@E@U@`@}@@@@@ A A A0A4A $If^gd@I6 $If^gdQ $If^$If 0$*$Ifgd'm4AHAZA[AAAAAABBBBBBBBBCC5C6C7C8CLCfCgC$$If^a$gdh $If^gd@I6NBBBBBB6C8CeCfCgCC>D?DBDuDDDDDDDDDDDDGGJJĻ}og[gRhSn5CJaJhP8hP85CJaJhP8CJaJh0hP85CJOJQJh0hP85CJ hP85CJ hd>*CJhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJ h@I6CJ h,6;CJ hP8CJhVNhdCJhnh@I6CJ hh5CJhhhh5CJ hhCJ hnCJ h@I65CJ hn5CJ hJ5CJgCCCCCD&D?D@DADBDvDDDDDDXkdV$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^gdn $If^gd@I6DDDDEEFFGG,I-IJJJJJJJJJJJJ[L @ X gdh $ @ X a$gdh $ @ X a$gdP8 @ X gdP8JJJJ[L;M*CJh1hP85CJaJhpCJaJhP8CJaJhhCJaJhP_5CJaJhh5CJaJ%[L\L;M*CJ h4]>*CJhVNh4]>*CJ hICJhk^hk^CJ hk^CJ hv35CJ hk^5CJ h4]5CJhVNh4]5CJhVNh4]CJ hv3CJ h4]CJ!TTTT U$U@UAUKULUbVcV6W7WXXYgdNV]gd4]Xkd$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^gd)YYCZDZZZZZZZZZZ[[[[[6[D[X[j[ $If^$If $Ifgd'm 0$*$Ifgd'm &d P $&d P a$gd5gdNV]SZmZxZZZZZZZZZZ[[5[6[D[W[X[i[j[s[[[[[[[[[B\C\s\{\\\\\\\\wmhVNhd>*CJhVNhp|>*CJhIhICJ hd5CJhVNhICJ h6sCJ hdCJ hICJhVNhd5CJh'mhdCJaJh'mh'mCJ^JaJh'mh'm5CJ^JaJhVNhCCJhVNh)CJhVNhdCJhVNhac\CJ(j[[[[[[[[[\*\C\D\E\F\|\\\XkdJ$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^\\\\\]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] ]!]"]#]$]%]&]$&d P a$gdC<\]]] ]!]$]%])]7]8]R]]]]]]]]]^^^2^3^C^D^T^U^f^g^^^^^^^^^ú|v|m|||v|f h)5CJhVNh[ECJ h)CJ h[ECJhVNh)5CJh'mh'mCJ^JaJh'mh'm5CJ^JaJh;h'm5^JhVNhac\CJhVNh)CJhVNhd&CJ hVNh-dh-dh) hVNh)hVNhd>*CJhhMhNV]aJhhMhNV]CJaJ&&]'](])]u]]]]]]]]]]]]^^^^^3^D^U^ $If^gd) $Ifgd) 0$*$Ifgd'm &d P gd)gd)U^g^^^^^^^^^^^+_G_c_d_e_o_gd)Xkd$$IflFZ$Zh:    4 lal $If^gd)^^^"_*_5_F_P_b_e_p_```````"`#`$`%`&`(`)`+`,`-`ĽĬhLShaha0JmHnHu ha0Jjha0JU hVNh\{ hVNhac\ hVNh)hghNV]CJ^JaJhVNh)>*CJ h,6;CJhVNh)CJhybYhybYCJ hybYCJo_p_`````&`'`(`)`*`+`,`-`h]h&`#$^gd\{gdac\ &d P gd)gdNV]gd)/ =!"#&$&%x$$Ifl!vh5Z5V5L#vZ#vV#vL:V l5Z5V5L4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4alx$$Ifl!vh5Z5h5:#vZ#vh#v::V l5Z5h5:4al8@8 Normal_HmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k(No List >B@> Body Text  ZB*CJ4 @4 Footer  !.)@. Page Number@+@"@ ` Endnote Text CJOJQJ4@24 aHeader  !-Xc%&)*BCFXnaq#:;L\x|6>_`akl  < = m n mn!"*KLMWXYZ[\'(MNZ\pIf2bcdxy7IPQv >Po 3456l ./0789:;   NORS_`!!""*"+"""""#/#A#b#c#######$0$1$S$b$s$$$$$$%%*%2%S%T%U%_%`%c&d&Q'R'S'T'''''''''''(((('((((((((((((()) )G)H)I)J))))))))**;+<+++++++++,G,\,],^,s,t,,,,,----*-+---.$.7.8.9.:.;.<.=.>.?.[.q........//////000011N2O2P2222222223333(3)3:3;3I3]3m3~333333334(4E4F4G4H4~4444444556666667c7x7y7z777777777777777 838E8U8`8}88888 9 9 90949H9Z9[999999:::::::::;;5;6;7;8;L;f;g;;;;;<&<?<@<A<B<v<<<<<<<<<==>>??,A-ABBBBBBBBBBBB[D\D;E@BCEFHIKLNOQRTVWYZ\]_`bcefh,`3 !t8@0(  B S  ?-X;irT;;ir|&];ir`;ir[;ir1[;irB;irl2[;iryc;ir`;ir,;irt?c;ir=Z;ir?[;irT`;irԴ[;ir|G[;ir ;ir`;ir ;ir ;ir, ;ir| ;ir ;ir7[;irB;ir/];ir< ;irG;ir:g;ir<[;ird\c;irX ;ir#];ir\`;ir ;irA;irt ;irL L;ir9g;ir$;ire;ire;irl8[;irc;irD;irtI[;irI[;irNc;irNc;irNc;irDNc;ir\Mc;irMc;irLc;ir ;irl ;ir ;ir ;irl6c;ir@[;irh;ir@[;ir< ;ir,R;ir];irDB;ir2R;ir];ir;ird5 ;ir ;irRa;ir\a;irt ;ir, ;irHc;irh;irt$;irw ;irx ;ir ;ir4 ;irTe;ir@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNPOQRSTUVWYXZ[\]^_`abdcefghijklmnopqrstxuvwy{z|}~ b##OOCJJddwwKK--e1&,,X^^PP\\@@""$$$$ %%%%&&&6'6'}''U(U(v)})})))+++*,,,,.///{22334 4 4b4b444667E777P9P9::::::::e<l<l<<<^=^===BBADADEEmJmJJJ7K7KKKLLLLLL#M?MmRR4S4SrSxSxS`T`TTTRUtUUUWWFWbW.X  !"#$%&')*+(,.-/0123456789:;<=?>@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNPOQRSTUVWYXZ[\]^_`abdcefghijklmnopqrstvwxuy{z|}~ 8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagstimeBo*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-regionV*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/h*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagskO*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddress0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsi*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsZ*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNamehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/Z*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceTypehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/iN*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet/http://www.5iantlavalampft-com:office:smarttags8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdate 0110111213141519220200220052006200723242526293046789DayHourMinuteMonthYear        o       ON   ON  ON        X+X.XLM_NX+X.X356]mNO!"KLMMcd$%cdP_' '!'!'"'"'++22222:3H3H3]333D4u4}4444444466688N::6;6;<<BBBB~K~KKKJMKM6O7OQQCRCRDRDRjSsS5WFWXXXX%X(X(X.XX+X.XYXR'md&ObC<d+t})j[Q X%iL'q^,.P2v3@I6P8!:,6;J;8<n]@PAIn|JVNLNO%RLSIOX3YybYac\4]NV]`j+c-dxg>inSn6stZv\{p|nk^*LJ=$7hd{) a$s 8@3wI&(t^p9-!A[EHfu:4 iCNaP_5(/@] FnN\xy34  !!$$''((G)H)+^,s,t,--..22;3I3E4F46777 8?<@<MJK KnKKLLRR6SDSCTDTUUUUUVVVVXX.X/@@@@@i0@@i0@@@~@ 6;6; 6;6;-X@@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial?5 z Courier New"qhlڬfRfRf& J-& J-!24dWW3qH(?d SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADOCourtsVictoria CisnerosOh+'0 ,8 T ` l x!SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADOicrUPRCourts ourourNormal Victoria CisnerosTE3ctMicrosoft Word 10.0@b@ɽ4@u5)@"4& J՜.+,0 hp  Colo Judicial Dept-W: !SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghiklmnopqstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F4Data j1TablerÐWordDocumentSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q