ࡱ> kmj7 H\bjbjUU (x7|7|WLlfffffffz $ $ $8D$$h$<z5d$$($$$%%%333333q45$6 9r)5f%%%%%)5y*ff$$>5y*y*y*%f$f$3y*%3y*y*/2ff3$$ Vvz $y*X33T505r3z9y*z93y*zzffffCC:DA/TF/AMREMM/3 December 22, 2000 Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (a division of the American Library Association) Cataloging and Classification Section Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access Report of the Task Force on the Review of the Draft Descriptive Cataloging of Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance, and Early-Modern Manuscripts (AMREMM) The Task Force on the Review of the Draft Descriptive Cataloging of Ancient, Medieval Renaissance, and Early-Modern Manuscripts (AMREMM) was charged with preparing a detailed review of version 12 of the draft AMREMM. In particular, the task force was charged with identifying instances in which AMREMM is not consistent with the general rules in AACR2R as well as the specific rules for manuscripts and suggesting ways in which consistency with AACR2R could be achieved. The members of the task force were Thomas L. Amos, Western Michigan University; Matthew Beacom, Yale University; Melissa Conway, Uncataloged Manuscript Control Center/DeRicci Census Project Update; Brad Eden, University of Nevada. Las Vegas; Daniel W. Kinney (Chair), State University of New York at Stony Brook; Gertrude Koh, Dominican University, GSLIS; Gabriele I. Kupitz, Brigham Young University; Maria Oldal, The Pierpont Morgan Library. The purpose of Descriptive Cataloging of Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance, and Early-Modern Manuscripts (AMREMM) is to provide guidance in creating bibliographic records for pre-modern manuscripts and to supplement AACR2R, chapter 4. As stated in the introduction, AMREMM is intended to be applied to various forms of pre-modern manuscripts (i.e., fragments, loose leaves, single and multiple-sheet letters, archival records, legal documents, rolls, bound codices). With the exception of published facsimiles, AMREMM may also be applied to microform, photographic, and electronic reproductions of manuscripts. AACR2R does not provide the kind of precise and detailed description and analysis that is required for pre-modern manuscripts because of their historical, artistic, or literary value. AMREMM is based on AACR2R, and AACR2R is to be followed when there is no specific provision otherwise in AMREMM. This report is a compilation of comments and suggestions by members of the task force. General observations are presented first followed by comments pertaining to specific rules and sections. The examples of the application of MARC21 to bibliographic records for manuscripts that are provided in AMREMM were considered to be out of the scope of the charge to the task force. The document, however, contains 30 pages of MARC examples. The lack of fixed field codes, errors in indicators and subfield coding, and certain interpretations of the format suggest that it should be reviewed rigorously and commented on by a MARBI task force. General Observations: The terms ancient, medieval, Renaissance, and early-modern as applied to manuscripts are not really defined. Some dates would be helpful. In addition, the rules do not clearly define a target group of users. Some portions of the rules seem to reflect concerns and practices of descriptive bibliography. Authors of printed manuscript catalogs are usually scholars in the field of manuscript studies who are recording the end results of original scholarship and who are putting a great emphasis on personal authorship. These catalogs may or may not be endorsed by the institution in possession of the described items. While it is quite obvious that AMREMM builds on the collective wisdom of all those who produced published manuscript catalogs, it is doubtful that AMREMM would be a guideline for the production of future printed catalogs. Some streamlining, simplification, clarification, and conformity to AACR2R, the LCRIs, and the MARC Format would be useful if the rules are designed to assist catalogers in libraries and museums. The use of the terms Optionally or Optional addition printed in italics instead of If desired would place the text stylistically in line with AACR2R and add clarity to the instructions. There is no section devoted to uniform titles. Rules 25.13 and 25.22B in AACR2R together with the available rule interpretations should be integrated into AMREMM. AMREMM falls short of explaining and consistently applying the uniform titles that are unique to manuscripts. The guidelines do not make it clear that manuscripts often have two uniform titles: a heading for the intellectual content and a heading for the manuscript as a physical entity. The latter is referred to uniform manuscript heading in AMREMM and it is often, but not always, the shelfmark of a manuscript. Rule 25.13A1b in AACR2R deals with this concept of double headings. Common examples of this case are liturgical manuscripts and manuscripts containing sacred scripture. When the authorship is unknown or diffuse and no other uniform title can be assigned, a manuscript has only a single uniform title identifying both the intellectual content and the physical entity. In such cases the heading may take one of two forms: the repository designation or the byname. Example for a shelfmark that identifies both the intellectual content and the physical object: Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. Manuscript. Clm 849 (n 97071904). Example for a byname that identifies both the intellectual content and the physical object: Cuoco napoletano (n 98100941) Scholars and curators in the field of manuscript studies use the shelfmark as a unique identifier for a manuscript. The usage criteria in AACR2R for the construction of name and uniform title headings for manuscripts have resulted in the use of popular names and bynames based on commercial facsimile publications. Popular names and bynames are mostly arbitrary. They vary from source to source and change over time. The publication of AMREMM provides the Anglo-American cataloging community with the opportunity to discuss and possibly modify this practice to prefer the shelfmark over popular names and bynames as the source for constructing uniform titles for manuscripts. In AMREMM, uniform manuscript heading (should be uniform title) is discussed under added entry access in Appendix A. Uniform titles of manuscripts may appear as main entries. It might be helpful to include an appendix in AMREMM providing instructions on the construction of uniform titles for manuscripts. The instructions could either explain the current rules with lots of examples, or outline a net approach that prefers shelfmark uniform titles to byname uniform titles. A page stating that area 8, standard number, does not apply should be included for consistency, since this is done for areas 3 and 6. An index to AMREMM for the convenience of those consulting the document would be a valuable addition. Comments pertaining to specific sections and rules in AMREMM: OC. Punctuation This rule contains an optional provision for double punctuation. In rare book cataloging, it may be important to preserve double punctuation to facilitate version/copy identification. In most cases this feature reveals something about the physical carriers of a certain text. Although they may contain a version of the same text, manuscripts by nature are unique, and bibliographic records for manuscripts will not be matched against one another in the way that the records for copies of early printed books are. Double punctuation was never applied to manuscript descriptions, and the introduction of this feature to AMREMM should be justified. If it does not contribute substantially to cataloging and retrieval, it should be omitted. 1. Title and statement of responsibility area Terms designating titles need clarification. These should be in line with definition and use in AACR2R. The treatment of titles in cataloging codices is closer to book cataloging than to the cataloging of archival collections. If the material to be cataloged can be more appropriately described by applying rules found in Hensons Archives, Personal Papers, and Manuscripts (APPM), then APPM should be used and not AMREMM. While it is important to point out that manuscripts, as opposed to printed items, may have titles coming from different sources and supplied at different times, it is counterproductive to divide the categories of titles and the rules governing their transcription in the title area further than they are in AACR2R. With the acknowledgement of the source and time period in a note, the result of applying AMREMM guidelines is the same as applying AACR2R for recording titles and statements of responsibility. The introduction of the word formal presents difficulties. The word formal carries the meaning of being artificial, supplied, imposed upon. The use of formal in AMREMM means exactly the opposite. It means the transcription of a title as it appears on the item to be cataloged. In APPM formal title means a title supplied at one point in time to cover a collection of material that never had a title to begin with. It is not necessary to introduce the formal title categories in AMREMM, and the following changes are suggested: Formal title and statement of responsibility should be Title and statement of responsibility. Formal title proper should be Title proper. Formal statement of responsibility should be Statement of responsibility. Consistent application of AACR2R categories and terminology works quite well for manuscripts. No matter how the titles are labeled, the catalog record ends up looking the same. The precise source and dating of information is recorded in a note. 1A2.2.1. General rule There is no guidance about arabic and roman numerals vs. numbers expressed as words. 1B1 Do not abridge the formal title proper. In AMREMM, most examples of titles proper (titles appearing in the manuscripts) are cited from published manuscript catalogs. Printed catalogs do not have the space concerns that a MARC bibliographic record has. Printed catalogs also have a scholarly agenda, which a MARC catalog record can not and must not claim. It is debatable whether a full title transcription adds extra value to a MARC record. Full title transcription beyond a certain point should be optional. It could be left to the catalogers judgement or to the cataloging institutions needs to decide how much of the title should be transcribed. Most retrieval in an online environment will be done on uniform and supplied titles. Catalogers at some institutions with manuscript holdings or with reproductions of manuscripts may not have the expertise to provide a full title transcription and they should not be mandated to do so. They should be given the option to provide a title from sources other than the chief source of information as it is defined in AMREMM. Without sufficient expertise, an attempt at full title transcription may yield unhelpful or misleading results even with the detailed instructions for transcription found in AMREMM. Scholars who pursue the study of a particular manuscript will take the catalog record as a pointer and will conduct their own research. They will provide their own version of title transcriptions in scholarly publications. 1B1.3 and 1F8 It might be better to put a correct version of the title/statement of responsibility in brackets and place the incorrect or obsolete title in a note. If appropriate, an added entry can be made for the incorrect or obsolete title. This would seem more in keeping with rule 21.4C in AACR2R for works erroneously or fictitiously attributed to a person or corporate body. It is also more consistent with the directives in AMREMM under 4B3 for treating a fictitious place and/or date. 1B1.4.2 Neither AACR2R nor Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Books (DCRB) encloses the mark of omission in square brackets. The inclusion of the supplied [et al.] is also absent in them. There is no reason why AMREMM should differ in this from AACR2R. The addition of [et al.] appears to be arbitrary and unnecessary. AMREMM should be brought in line with AACR2R. The use of [... et al.] in the MARC coding examples should also be reviewed. There is no reason for a title selected as the collective title of the item to be repeated in the contents note (cf. AACR2R 1.1G). AMREMM should follow AACR2R guidelines for titles. Other instances of repeating titles should be reviewed and preferably removed from AMREMM. 1B1.4.3 (p. 27) The sentence that reads As a matter of practical consideration, it is generally not desirable to include more than three separate titles within a collective title should be reviewed for style. It is simply instructing the cataloger to apply the rule of three. 1B1.4.3 It is unprecedented in AACR2R that titles included in area 1 are repeated in the contents note. This rule is also lacking in the concordance and should be connected to rules 1.1G3 and 4.1G1 in AACR2R. 1B1.4 is missing from the concordance on p. 120 of AMREMM. It should be connected to AACR2R 1.1G1 and 4.G1. 1B2.3.1. Content date 1B2.3.2. Letters 1B2.3.3. Legal documents and archival records The rules in this section contradict the guidelines in APPM. Two sets of rules for the same type of materials may result in confusion and hinder machine retrieval. Systems are instructed to look for information in a specific field and subfield of the MARC record. Retrieval is successful only if information is recorded consistently. APPM was compiled to augment AACR2R for certain types of materials (just as AMREMM is attempting to do the same for ancient, medieval, Renaissance, and early-modern manuscripts). There is no need for AMREMM to revert back to pre-APPM AACR2R rules. APPM should be followed whenever possible. 1D. Parallel titles. 1D1 could use an example to make the rule clearer. Clarification is also needed for 1D2, which does not seem to allow for recording parallel titles in area 1. 1E. Other title information See comments under 1B1.1 above. 1F8. An example illustrating this rule would be helpful. 4B2. An example illustrating this rule would be helpful. 4C. Place of production AMREMM prescribes including the place of production in area 4. The manuscript cataloging community would be very much in favor of doing this. However, the guidelines ought to indicate that this is a major departure from AACR2R, which does not record this information in area 4 for Manuscripts, Graphics, and 3-D (presumably because all three types are unpublished, and AACR2R is geared to cataloging published material). Its not clear why the rule begins by describing how to supply place information that is lacking. It surely ought to begin by instructing how to transcribe existing information, and then treat cases where this information is lacking. A rewrite of AMREMM 4C is suggested as follows: Proposed revised version of AMREMM: Transcribe a place of production for an item from the prescribed source of information (see 0B2). Enclose in square brackets information about the place of production that is transcribed from a source other than the prescribed source. (SEE AACR2R re book cataloging) In cases where the cataloger judges that additional information would be helpful to identify the location, supply it after the transcribed place in brackets. A Paris (The example in AMREMM gives Paris although the text from which the place name is extracted reads: Paris. AACR2R would use Paris but DCRB, with its emphasis on transcription, would use A Paris; AMREMM could go with the more exact transcription.) In conventu Osnaburgensi [Germany] (The example in AMREMM gives [Osnabruck], although the information exists on the item.) [NEEDED: example where the information is transcribed from a source other than the chief source] If the item contains no information about the place of production but the cataloger is able to supply it, enclose the information in brackets, applying 23.2A (use the English form of the name ). [Spain] [Northern France] [Diocese of Freising, Germany] If the attribution of a place is conjectural, follow with a question mark. [Siena?] There is no need to insert a country unless the place name is obscure (cf. A Paris above, which is not qualified by France). Those doing research on the country level will get access via the added entry for place. The complete name of the country (including regions or counties) will appear in an added entry (see AMREMM, A3.1.1). The section that begins If a general area of production should be omitted. Issues of certainty about place (we know it was France, we think it might be Brittany, or even Le Conquet) should be addressed in the notes. The formatting proposed in AMREMM, Country/Region/City is non-AACR2R. Descriptive bibliographers use it, but AACR2R and AMREMM are cataloging codes. Leave the last sentence (If no place ...) as is. 4C1. Place of production It might be helpful to mention including the original form of the place of production in a note (7B14) and to refer to A3.1.1, which deals with the creation of an added entry for the original name of the place of production 4D1. Date of production This directive should include making a note for the date in its original form (7B14). The original form can be very helpful to scholars. 5C1. Support The rule states to indicate in a note the animal from which the material that serves as the writing support came. An example of such a note would be helpful. 5C2. Illustrative matter Given the historical importance of miniatures in many medieval manuscripts, it might be useful to have the option of including a count of illustrations within the statement for illustrative matter. Although rule 4.7B23 in AACR2R and rule 7A3 in AMREMM allow for this kind of information in notes, it would be helpful to have a count of illustrations in this part of the record for artistically significant manuscripts. 7B1.2. The word possess in the fifth sentence should be possesses. 7B7.3. Quire signatures, leaf signatures, and catchwords. The word instead appears twice in the second sentence, making an awkward construction. 7B19. Preferred form of citation/current shelfmark Record the current shelfmark of an item as its preferred form of citation Catalogers in institutions other than the holding institution should not be supplying preferred forms of citation. Preferred forms of citation can not be made equal to shelfmarks. The term current shelfmark needs to be removed from the heading. For the Book of Kells, the preferred form of citation may be the popular name, Book of Kells. Some manuscripts do not have a shelfmark (e.g., the exultet roll in the Museo diocesano di Salerno, or in the Cathedral of Bari). 7B21. References to published treatments or editions Both examples under 7B21 should be expanded to include a more complete bibliographic citation (cf. the examples in MARC21 for field 581). The wording in AMREMM gives priority to the text over the manuscript as a physical entity. The definition in MARC21 for the corresponding field includes references to exhibition and collection catalogs that include reproductions. References to reproductions are especially important for illuminated manuscripts, and AMREMM should include a provision for reproductions. 7B22. Additional physical form Facsimile reproductions are distinct bibliographic entities as opposed to being an additional physical form of the original manuscript. Facsimile reproductions should be cited under 7B21. It is suggested that the first example under 7B21 be of a facsimile edition. Facsimile editions are often the most valuable resource for further study because they reproduce both text and decoration. Most facsimile publications are accompanied by extensive commentaries, which, in most cases, represent the state of scholarship at the time of publication. Listing facsimiles under 7B21 (MARC field 581) instead of under 7B20 (MARC field 530) would allow them to be retrieved along with other bibliographic references. 7B27. Cataloging history This note should be omitted from AMREMM. No provision for cataloging history can be found in AACR2R, DCRB, or APPM. This note has its origin in descriptive bibliography and is not appropriate for a shared cataloging environment where the identity of the holding institution and the institution that is the source of cataloging is sufficient. A3.1.2. Uniform manuscript heading The last example gives the folio ranges as ff. 1r-56r. It should be formulated as fol. 1-56 (Only versos are marked, and the abbreviation for folio is fol.). An example under 25.13B1c in AACR2R provides a similar formulation for folios. Appendix C: Retrospective conversion of existing manuscript descriptions It is suggested that Appendix C be omitted from AMREMM. The purpose of AMREMM is to guide catalogers in the creation of bibliographic records. This goal equally applies to the original cataloging process and to retrospective conversion projects. The descriptions, definitions, and instructions in Appendix C do not appear to be substantial enough to warrant inclusion in a set of cataloging rules. Retrospective conversion differs from institution to institution. Guidelines for retrospective conversion projects are established according to the quality and quantity of legacy data, available personnel and financial resources, etc. Appendix C does not seem to contribute to the decision making process, which is unique to each institution. Conclusion: The members of the task force were unanimous in their praise of AMREMM. This excellent document well fills a specialized but real need for an extension to our cataloging rules and it will be a welcome tool for libraries with manuscript collections and collections of reproductions of manuscripts. Not only is AMREMM flexible enough to be adapted in most cases for records at varying levels of detail and complexity, but it is also clear enough to be understood by catalogers unfamiliar with medieval or Renaissance manuscripts. Gregory Pass is to be commended for having considered and solved many of the most complicated issues in manuscript cataloging. He has also provided an ample bibliography--conveniently subdivided by category--and a glossary of technical terms. The comments and suggestions presented above are made with the intent of enhancing an already valuable document. CC:DA/TF/AMREMM/3 December 22, 2000 Page  PAGE 2 PAGE 9 $%t}PY=C& | ~  %   { 4 : G M S Y %;<EKbi!tz3C 6CJOJQJ56CJ OJQJ5CJ OJQJ5CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ CJOJQJ CJOJQJ5OJQJ^JK$%`@[}~  %;<UV@&$@&a$$a$$a$$a$[G\V783QRgh ""3"##%)))B*@&t{  !!"3"""########%%s%y%%%&&&'''(())C*F*t*z*z..1/7/0)0D1J111 2 222#2(2L2N2R22233O3V3u3{3B4H4Q4W4f4l44444455CJOJQJ\5CJOJQJ56CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ6CJOJQJ CJOJQJQB*C*q*0-1-00)0 2 22334445566697:7P7a77:::@&556666667"7(7:77778889-93999999999::::::4;8;n;;;e<k<<=(>.>L>h>n>q>]?b?h?7@=@@@@@@@[AaADDEEEEEEFFTFmFNGfGGGHHIIII6>*CJOJQJ>*CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ\6CJOJQJ CJOJQJT::::::3;4;m;n;;.=/=K>L>p>q>]?~??@@&@'@&A'AJAKAA^@&AABBBBBCCRCSC\C]CDDF FSFTFmFMGNGfGGGGHHH[J[J\JJJ7K8KlKKKMMMOOORRR%T&TIT>U?UUWWsXtX@&I\JbJJJJ7K8KlKLLMMMMdNjNOOOORRRR+S1S3S7S\G\H\˼0JmHnHu0J j0JU0JCJmHnHu0JCJj0JCJU5CJ CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ6CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ\ CJOJQJBtXXX[[[\!\1\2\3\>\?\@\A\B\C\D\E\F\G\H\$a$h]h&`#$$a$@&& 00&P/ =!"#$%[ i@@@ Normal CJOJQJ_HkHmH sH tH >`> Heading 1$@&5CJOJQJ\T@T Heading 2$<@& 56CJOJQJ\]^JaJN@N Heading 3$<@&5CJOJQJ\^JaJJ@J Heading 4$<@&5CJOJQJ\aJF@F Heading 5 <@&56CJ\]aJH@H Heading 6 <@&5CJOJQJ\aJB@B Heading 7 <@&CJOJQJaJH@H Heading 8 <@&6CJOJQJ]aJF @F Heading 9 <@&CJOJQJ^JaJ<A@< Default Paragraph Font&)@& Page Number, @, Footer  !8Y@8 Document Map-D OJQJ,@", Header  !2B`22 Body Text CJOJQJHC`BH Body Text Indent ^ CJOJQJ<T@R< Block Textx]^4P@b4 Body Text 2 dx6Q@r6 Body Text 3xCJaJXM@1X Body Text First Indentx` CJOJQJdN@Ad Body Text First Indent 2hx^h` CJOJQJJR@J Body Text Indent 2hdx^hLS@L Body Text Indent 3hx^hCJaJ0"@0 Caption xx5\*?@* Closing ^,@, Comment TextL@ Date4[@4 E-mail Signature ,+@, Endnote Text!h$@"h Envelope Address!"@ &+D/^@ CJOJQJ^JaJ>%@2> Envelope Return# OJQJ^J.@B. Footnote Text$2`@R2 HTML Address%6]Be@bB HTML Preformatted& OJQJ^J2 @2 Index 1'8^`82 @2 Index 2(8^`82 @2 Index 3)X8^X`82 @2 Index 4* 8^ `82@2 Index 5+8^`82@2 Index 6,8^`82@2 Index 7-x8^x`82@2 Index 8.@8^@`82@2 Index 9/8^`8@!@r@ Index Heading05OJQJ\^J,/@, List1h^h`02@"0 List 22^`03@20 List 338^8`04@B0 List 44^`05@R0 List 55^`20@b2 List Bullet 6 & F66@r6 List Bullet 2 7 & F67@6 List Bullet 3 8 & F68@6 List Bullet 4 9 & F69@6 List Bullet 5 : & F:D@: List Continue;hx^h>E@> List Continue 2<x^>F@> List Continue 3=8x^8>G@> List Continue 4>x^>H@> List Continue 5?x^21@2 List Number @ & F6:@6 List Number 2 A & F6;@"6 List Number 3 B & F6<@26 List Number 4 C & F 6=@B6 List Number 5 D & F d-@Rd Macro Text"E  ` @ OJQJ^J_HmH sH tH I@b Message HeadergF8$d%d&d'd-DM NOPQ^8`CJOJQJ^JaJ<^@r< Normal (Web)GCJOJQJaJ6@6 Normal Indent H^,O@, Note HeadingI4Z@4 Plain TextJ OJQJ^J(K@( SalutationK.@@. Signature L^FJ@F SubtitleM$<@&a$CJOJQJ^JaJL,@L Table of AuthoritiesN8^`8D#@D Table of FiguresOp^`pN>@N TitleP$<@&a$5CJ KHOJQJ\^JaJ H.@H TOA HeadingQx5CJOJQJ\^JaJ@ TOC 1R&@& TOC 2 S^&@& TOC 3 T^&@& TOC 4 UX^X&@& TOC 5 V ^ &@& TOC 6 W^&@& TOC 7 X^&@& TOC 8 Yx^x&@& TOC 9 Z@^@HX x $%`@[}~% ; <   UV783QRgh 3!%%%B&C&q&0)1),,), . ..//0001122293:3P3a33666666663747m7n77.9/9K:L:p:q:];~;;<<&<'<&='=J=K===>>>>>??R?S?\?]?@@B BSBTBmBMCNCfCCCCDDD[F\FFF7G8GlGGGIIIKKKNNN%P&PIP>Q?QQSSsTtTTTWWX!X1X2X@XAXBXCXDXEXIX0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 08EGIKN5IH\046:VB*:A[JtXH\135789;G\2+248?AN!!t8@0(  B S  ?$%% F G O P Q R [ \ ] ^ j k p q } ~ klvw{|  $%12?@~!!!!!"""#")"*"x"y"""##########&$'$2$3$Y$Z$\$]$p$q$|$}$$$$$$$$$$$G&H&o&p&l(m((((,(,//#/$///// 1 111771929D<E<J<K<<<<<<<<<>>>>??@@@@9B:BIBJBmFnFuFvFFFFFFFFFFF8G9GlGmGGGxHyHHH=L>LVLWLtPuPPPPPPPPPPPWWW X&X0X1X3X=X@X@XAXAXBXFXIXAdam L. Schiff/C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AutoRecovery save of Amremm.asdAdam L. Schiff+C:\My Documents\CCDA\Task Forces\Amremm.docAdam L. Schiff+C:\My Documents\CCDA\Task Forces\Amremm.docAdam L. Schiff+C:\My Documents\CCDA\Task Forces\Amremm.doc John AttigKC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Amremm2.asd John Attig&C:\My Documents\ccda\clean\Amremm2.doc John Attig&C:\My Documents\ccda\clean\Amremm2.doc John Attig&C:\My Documents\ccda\clean\Amremm2.doc John Attig&C:\My Documents\ccda\clean\Amremm2.doc John Attig&C:\My Documents\ccda\clean\Amremm2.doc |[ D}C~BhA:0V9X8(07 &c@#?6^`.^`.88^8`.^`. ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( 88^8`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(hh^h`. hh^h`OJQJo( ~}| WFXIX@Acrobat PDFWriterLPT1:PDFWRITRAcrobat PDFWriterAcrobat PDFWriter$ od``Acrobat PDFWriter$ od``8HX@UnknownG:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial?5 :Courier New7Tms Rmn5& :Tahoma" PhmEu#QS#Qw aGef {Ihp!P20dF^XW2QP AMREMM Report daniel kinney John Attig Oh+'0 ( D P \ ht|AMREMM ReportoMREdaniel kinneyoaniani Normal.dote John Attige19nMicrosoft Word 9.0@ @(zv@ڗ@vw aG ՜.+,0( px  (STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.Y. at Stony BrookfeF^ AMREMM Report Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY[\]^_`acdefghilRoot Entry F@wvn1Table=z9WordDocument(xSummaryInformation(ZDocumentSummaryInformation8bCompObjjObjectPool@wv@wv  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q