ࡱ> ]_\ \bjbj Fdωω%%%%,Q%-----5777777,cic----55dAR!0  \cc + :    Sample Scoring Rubrics for Presentations Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #1 Category Scoring CriteriaTotal Points Score Organization (15 points)The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.5Information is presented in a logical sequence.5Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.5 Content (45 points)Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.5Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience.5Presentation contains accurate information.10Material included is relevant to the overall message/purpose.10Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made reflect well their relative importance.10There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.5 Presentation (40 points)Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).5Speaker uses a clear, audible voice.5Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.5Good language skills and pronunciation are used.5Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.5Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.5Information was well communicated.10ScoreTotal Points100 Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #2 Content and Scientific Merit (60 points) Introduction: % Defines background and importance of research. % States objective, and is able to identify relevant questions. Body: % Presenter has a scientifically valid argument. % Addresses audience at an appropriate level (rigorous, but generally understandable to a scientifically-minded group). % Offers evidence of proof/disproof. % Describes methodology. % The talk is logical. Conclusion: % Summarizes major points of talk. % Summarizes potential weaknesses (if any) in findings. % Provides you with a  take-home message. Speaking Style/Delivery (20 points) % Speaks clearly and at an understandable pace. % Maintains eye contact with audience. % Well rehearsed (either extemporaneous or scripted presentation). % Limited use of filler words ( umm,  like, etc.). % Speaker uses body language appropriately. % Speaker is within time limits. % Speaker is able to answer questions professionally. % Speaker is dressed appropriately. Audio/Visual (20 points) % Graphs/figures are clear and understandable. % The text is readable and clear. % Audio/Visual components support the main points of the talk. % Appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter General Comments Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #3 PRESENCE 5 4 3 2 1 0 -body language & eye contact -contact with the public -poise -physical organization LANGUAGE SKILLS 5 4 3 2 1 0 -correct usage -appropriate vocabulary and grammar -understandable (rhythm, intonation, accent) -spoken loud enough to hear easily ORGANIZATION 5 4 3 2 1 0 -clear objectives -logical structure -signposting MASTERY OF THE SUBJECT 5 4 3 2 1 0 -pertinence -depth of commentary -spoken, not read -able to answer questions VISUAL AIDS 5 4 3 2 1 0 -transparencies, slides -handouts -audio, video, etc. OVERALL IMPRESSION 5 4 3 2 1 0 -very interesting / very boring -pleasant / unpleasant to listen to -very good / poor communication TOTAL SCORE _______ / 30 Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #4 Poor Excellent PRESENTATION SKILLS 1 2 3 4 5 Were the main ideas presented in an orderly and clear manner? ( ( ( ( ( Did the presentation fill the time allotted? ( ( ( ( ( Were the overheads/handouts appropriate and helpful to the audience? ( ( ( ( ( Did  )67jkluv 4 5 z   P Q j k   K L ( ) R S K L t `ɽɽɽɵɵɵɵɵɵձݭhG h2>6 h2>>*h>/h2>hJhfh3{5he3Shfhe3S5h3{hfh65hfhJ5hbh65h6hz(CJ(aJ(hhz(CJ(aJ(hz(=     jkluv$ h$Ifa$gdf $ ha$gd6 $ ha$gdz($a$gdz(I: h$Ifgdfkd$$Ifl\!%(6 < t0644 laytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf 0 5kd$$Ifl4\!%(`6 < t0644 laytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf hdh$Ifgdf0 2 3 4 5 v x 5kdF$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 laytf hdh$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfx y z { | } J5555$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 laytf hdh$Ifgdf     hdh$Ifgdf h$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf   Q f \G8& hdh$Ifgdf h$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd$$Ifl4\!%(`6 < t0644 laytff h i j k 5kd;$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 laytf hdh$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf J55$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 laytf hdh$Ifgdf  VA2 h$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf F I J K L /kd=$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf hdh$IfgdfL /kd$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf hdh$Ifgdf $ & '  hdh$Ifgdf h$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf' ( ) N P Q VA/A/ hdh$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd$$Ifl4\!%(`6 < t0644 lap ytfQ R S  VA/A/ hdh$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkdY$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf VA/A/ hdh$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd $$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf VA2 h$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdfkd$$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf  /kdu $$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf hdh$Ifgdf G I J K L /kd) $$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf hdh$IfgdfL o r s t z /kd $$Ifl4\!%( 6 < t0644 lap ytf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf hdh$Ifgdfz 7kd $$Ifl\!%(6 < t0644 laytf hdh$Ifgdf$ hdh$Ifa$gdf bTFX"$l h0^`0gdG hgdGgdGh`hgdG $ ha$gd2> hdhgd6`b  "$jjXz cstuv~Vmnx01; &efghijklmnop h@rh@r j,h@r h@r5h@rhy hy5 hf5 h=5 h=>*h= hG6hGh2>LllhjBVX|~ $ ha$gd= h0^`0gd= h0^`0gdG (BJbc 3GUVy h^."%0^`0gd=<] ' h !"$R&(dgdwtY h !n(0d^`0gdwtY$ hda$gdwtY h^."%0^`0gd= h^."%gd='p;XXXXXYfYYYZbZcZvZZ[_[[ h !"$R&(dgdwtY h !"$R&(dhgdwtY h !"$R&(dgdwtY h !"$R&(dgdwtYX/X0X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8X9X:XwXxXyXzX{X|X}X~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Y Y Y Y YYYYYYYYYZY[Y\Y]Y^Y_Y`YaYbYcYdYeYYYYYYYYYYYYY hy5hy h@rh@rU j,h@rh@rZthe talk maintain the interest of the audience? ( ( ( ( ( Was there a theme or take-home message to the presentation? ( ( ( ( ( Was the presenter responsive to audience questions? ( ( ( ( ( KNOWLEDGE BASE Was proper background information on the topic given? ( ( ( ( ( Was the material selected for presentation appropriate to the topic? ( ( ( ( ( Was enough essential information given to allow the audience to effectively ( ( ( ( ( evaluate the topic? Was irrelevant or filler information excluded? ( ( ( ( ( Did the presenter have a clear understanding of the material presented? ( ( ( ( ( CRITICL THINKING Were the main issues in this area clearly identified? ( ( ( ( ( Were both theoretical positions and empirical evidence presented? ( ( ( ( ( Were the strengths and weaknesses of these theories, and the methods used to ( ( ( ( ( gather this evidence adequately explained? Did the presenter make recommendations for further work in this area? ( ( ( ( ( Did the main conclusions of the presentation follow from the material presented? ( ( ( ( ( Were competing explanations or theories considered and dealt with properly? ( ( ( ( ( OVERALL IMPRESSION _______ / 15 COMMENTS TOTAL SCORE _______ / 100 YZZZZZZZ Z Z Z Z ZVZWZXZYZZZ[Z\Z]Z^Z_Z`ZaZbZcZsZuZvZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[[[[[[S[T[U[V[W[X[Y[Z[[[\[][^[[[[[[[[[[[[[.\/\0\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\ h@r5 hy5hy j,h@r h@rh@rh@rX[[:\\\\\\\\\\\\ h(BdgdwtY h"$R&(dgdwtY h( dgdwtY h !"$R&(dgdwtY 7\8\9\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\hyhy5 hwtY5hwtYhwtY5 hY5hwtY hy5hy h@rh@r j,h@rh@r D1h:p@r/ =!"h#8$h%0 *Zj$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l t0656 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l4 t06+56 555<p ytf$$If!vh#v6 #v#v#v<:V l t0656 555<ytf"|666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~8XV~ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List jj 6 Table Grid7:V0PK!pO[Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢]yl#!MB;.n̨̽\A1&ҫ QWKvUbOX#&1`RT9<l#$>r `С-;c=1g?}~O:~kҏM݄׷ )I0wK)K`qfݢFHb?G+D7HȌ x|iRLJqbOYPΥyL#R=E6wR#ϣ\16h>(()1!F\OI1yA"֐LəQMc@^V6o#6ϝU񅉄Q )FRrFrB72aʜ snyz? rnyӑCv(Yذ: ~%'L̼C9c_lj5xS,<̨ɊVRohzB+~KOOI̲uk##7~FmKw{ 7n_n?/绗Bx˭kYW[d}N('\m9zj"Cy'.ʐq2&""h;+Dpqg8lհշerfk.NsHlk~9"Gڛҽb5i{d&D{=(!hjew¢kaёשaʬɁV=0#xBdTyL`MvL$r3IȨc4Euиid(|PZX6` 4Օem5}(-z0Y@pE4g6ʲȸ"WABJ+_JCz%YA$BO6"#Zaol ijK.Joegzmo1QT5#QQt1JK:ꬌvVhglzPnZvޮ{&iv3fXXޮk!M;|.ے]k>2~{QLfPweXjv1jv&~kv+neN`]04_+U՗;{ 1K*J%|zl&jO"DqkH}]^J*^ӫU:~Y~>uË(*/]۽%UTq! :[q*f\Na+hto\B~3ZNUתIn5}b+壈W:PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-!pO[Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 -_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!o(ʾtheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] d`Y7\\%*/10 x  f  L ' Q L z l'[\ !"#$&'()08@0( 1remoteW B S  ? Ȫ ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o  p^ `OJQJo(  @ ^ `OJQJo( x^x`OJQJo(H^H`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(z(>/q>Ge3SwtY@r3{YJ+"6f7:2>y=@~Td @0@@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3 *Cx ArialUEuclid Math OneSymbol? *Cx Courier New;WingdingsA$BCambria Math"h׽HG׽HG $ $8243HP ?+"2!xx 2Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #1Testing and Evaluation ServicesSyamsul Nor Azlan Mohamad  Oh+'0 4 Xd   '4Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #1 Testing and Evaluation Services Normal.dotmSyamsul Nor Azlan Mohamad2Microsoft Macintosh Word@F#@;R@;R ՜.+,0$ hp  ' UW Madison$  3Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #1 Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012456789:<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKMNOPQRSUVWXYZ[^Root Entry F@AR`Data 31Table; WordDocumentFdSummaryInformation(LDocumentSummaryInformation8TCompObjr  F Microsoft Word 97-2004 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q