ࡱ>  8bjbj00 Z_Z_,GFFSSHTHTHTdTTT\UpVT4W2fY^YYYk,no$ǔpHTOp+k|kOpOpSSYYgьtttOpSlYHTYtOptthT,\'p 20R^7p7,&7HTֆtOpOpOpsOpOpOpOpOpOpOp7OpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpOpFX vR:    2012 by Third Millennium Ministries All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means for profit, except in brief quotations for the purposes of review, comment, or scholarship, without written permission from the publisher, Third Millennium Ministries, Inc., 316 Live Oaks Blvd., Casselberry, Florida 32707. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 International Bible Society. Used by Permission of Zondervan Bible Publishers. About Thirdmill Founded in 1997, Thirdmill is a non-profit Evangelical Christian ministry dedicated to providing: Biblical Education. For the World. For Free. Our goal is to offer free Christian education to hundreds of thousands of pastors and Christian leaders around the world who lack sufficient training for ministry. We are meeting this goal by producing and globally distributing an unparalleled multimedia seminary curriculum in English, Arabic, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish. Our curriculum is also being translated into more than a dozen other languages through our partner ministries. The curriculum consists of graphic-driven videos, printed instruction, and internet resources. It is designed to be used by schools, groups, and individuals, both online and in learning communities. Over the years, we have developed a highly cost-effective method of producing award-winning multimedia lessons of the finest content and quality. Our writers and editors are theologically-trained educators, our translators are theologically-astute native speakers of their target languages, and our lessons contain the insights of hundreds of respected seminary professors and pastors from around the world. In addition, our graphic designers, illustrators, and producers adhere to the highest production standards using state-of-the-art equipment and techniques. In order to accomplish our distribution goals, Thirdmill has forged strategic partnerships with churches, seminaries, Bible schools, missionaries, Christian broadcasters and satellite television providers, and other organizations. These relationships have already resulted in the distribution of countless video lessons to indigenous leaders, pastors, and seminary students. Our websites also serve as avenues of distribution and provide additional materials to supplement our lessons, including materials on how to start your own learning community. Thirdmill is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) corporation. We depend on the generous, tax-deductible contributions of churches, foundations, businesses, and individuals. For more information about our ministry, and to learn how you can get involved, please visit  HYPERLINK "http://www.thirdmill.org" www.thirdmill.org. Contents  TOC \t "Heading 1,1,Heading 2,2,Heading 3,3,Chapter heading,1,Panel Heading,2,Bullet Heading,3" INTRODUCTION  PAGEREF _Toc70002067 \h 1 ORIENTATION  PAGEREF _Toc70002068 \h 1 Definition  PAGEREF _Toc70002069 \h 1 Indicative  PAGEREF _Toc70002070 \h 2 Factual  PAGEREF _Toc70002071 \h 3 Theological  PAGEREF _Toc70002072 \h 4 Direct  PAGEREF _Toc70002073 \h 5 Legitimacy  PAGEREF _Toc70002074 \h 5 Divine Incomprehensibility  PAGEREF _Toc70002075 \h 6 Modern Scientific Rationalism  PAGEREF _Toc70002076 \h 7 Place  PAGEREF _Toc70002077 \h 8 FORMATION  PAGEREF _Toc70002078 \h 9 Philosophical Interactions  PAGEREF _Toc70002079 \h 9 Interpretation of Scripture  PAGEREF _Toc70002080 \h 10 Challenges  PAGEREF _Toc70002081 \h 10 Factual Reduction  PAGEREF _Toc70002082 \h 11 Factual Collation  PAGEREF _Toc70002083 \h 15 VALUES AND DANGERS  PAGEREF _Toc70002084 \h 17 Christian Living  PAGEREF _Toc70002085 \h 17 Enhancement  PAGEREF _Toc70002086 \h 17 Hindrance  PAGEREF _Toc70002087 \h 18 Interaction in Community  PAGEREF _Toc70002088 \h 19 Enhancement  PAGEREF _Toc70002089 \h 19 Hindrance  PAGEREF _Toc70002090 \h 20 Exegesis of Scripture  PAGEREF _Toc70002091 \h 22 Enhancement  PAGEREF _Toc70002092 \h 22 Hindrance  PAGEREF _Toc70002093 \h 23 CONCLUSION  PAGEREF _Toc70002094 \h 24 GLOSSARY  PAGEREF _Toc70002095 \h 26  INTRODUCTION In courts of law throughout the world, lawyers try to convince a judge or jury of their point of view. Its always crucial to their arguments that everyone understands the basic facts of the case. So, frequently near the end of a trial, lawyers review the facts stating them as plainly as possible in a series of propositions. This is a fact. That is a fact. This happened. That happened. Well in many ways, the same kind of thing is true in systematic theology. Systematicians also have to establish certain facts, certain theological facts. So, they present their cases in straightforward theological propositions. This is the third lesson in our series Building Systematic Theology and weve entitled this lesson Propositions in Systematics. Traditional systematic theologians are committed to exploring, explaining and defending sound Christian theology. And as we will see in this lesson, an essential part of that commitment is expressing Christian beliefs in theological propositions. Our lesson will divide into three main parts. First, well gain a general orientation toward propositions in Systematics. What are they? And how do they fit within the process of building systematic theology? Second, well explore how propositions are formed in systematic theology. And third, well examine some of the values and dangers of this focus on propositions. Lets begin by focusing our attention on some preliminary considerations, a general orientation toward this aspect of building systematic theology. ORIENTATION Our orientation toward propositions in systematics will touch on three issues. First, well provide a general definition of propositions. Second, well focus on their legitimacy. And third, well describe the place of theological propositions. What role do they have in the whole process of building a systematic theology? Lets look first at our definition of theological propositions. Definition I suppose that most of us sense that theology can be expressed in a variety of ways. When we pray, sing hymns, evangelize, tell bible stories to our children, or discuss our faith with our friends, were expressing Christian theology. But in the discipline of systematic theology, there is one main way theology is verbalized, and that is in the form of theological propositions. For our purposes, well define theological propositions in this way: A theological proposition is as an indicative sentence that asserts as directly as possible at least one factual theological claim. Before we look at the details of this definition, lets take a look at some examples of what we mean. In the second volume, part 2, chapter 2 of William Shedds Dogmatic Theology, he made these statements about the twofold obedience of Christ: A distinction is made between Christs active and passive obedience. The latter denotes Christs suffering of every kind Christs active obedience is his perfect performance of the moral law. Here, we see that Shedd made three basic assertions. First, he made a general statement that Christs obedience can be described in two categories: active and passive. The second is that Christs passive obedience was his endurance of suffering. And the third is that Christs active obedience was his flawless fulfillment of Gods moral law. Now, recalling our previous lessons, we can see that Shedd focused on two technical theological terms: passive obedience and active obedience. But in this lesson, were more interested in the way theologians like Shedd incorporate technical terms into theological propositions. To explore this issue, lets look once more at our definition: A theological proposition is an indicative sentence that asserts as directly as possible at least one factual theological claim. This definition focuses on four characteristics of propositions in systematic theology. First, they are indicative sentences. Second, they are factual claims. Third, these factual claims are primarily theological in nature. And fourth, they make direct factual theological claims, or as we put it, they state matters as directly as possible. Lets take a closer look at each aspect of this definition, beginning with the idea that theological propositions are indicative sentences. Indicative Now we all know that there are different kinds of sentences in ordinary human language. For instance, the sentence, Where is my key? is an interrogative, a question. Open the door is an imperative sentence because it issues a command or invitation. Neither of these sentences qualifies as a proposition. But the sentence, My key will open the door is an indicative sentence that declares what the key will do. We should be clear that as systematic theologians present their points of view, they use all kinds of expressions but at the same time, the dominant mode of expression in systematic theology is straightforward indicative statements. This mode of expression is so dominant that it would be impossible to write a traditional systematic theology any other way. In addition to understanding that propositions are in the form of indicative sentences, its also important to see that theyre designed to assert factual claims. Factual Propositions identify and describe facts. Now through the millennia, philosophers, theologians and linguists have noted that different kinds of propositions make different kinds of factual claims. These matters are far too complex for us to deal with comprehensively, but at the risk of oversimplifying the issues, well note two aspects of propositions that should be kept in mind as we explore systematic theology. Following the contours of discussions rooted in Aristotles writings on logic, well point out that propositions may be distinguished first as to their quantity, and second, as to their quality. First, propositions may be described in terms of the quantity of their subject. The subject of a universal proposition includes every member of a set without exception. For example, the statement All mammals have hair, claims that something is true of all mammals. In much the same way, systematic theologians often make universal claims in theology. Its common for Christian theologians to say things like, All human beings are the image of God or All good gifts come from God. On the other hand, other propositions are particular because their subjects include only some members of a larger set. For instance, if I say, This house is my house. Im making a factual claim that is particular, not universal. Im not saying something about all houses, only about my own house. Systematicians frequently make particular factual claims as well. For instance, they might say something like, Some church members are unbelievers, or they might claim that Paul was an apostle. Now for the most part, systematicians try to describe quantities as precisely as possible sometimes even being more precise than particular verses in the bible. But from time to time, theyll abbreviate issues into generalizations by not mentioning exceptions. For instance, it would be common for a systematic theologian to say, All human beings are sinners. And at first glance, this universal proposition seems to be true. But this statement is not as precise as it could be. In reality, the whole of Scripture teaches that Jesus was a human being, but that he was righteous. So, from time to time, we do have to pause and ask whether at any given moment systematicians are actually claiming something about all or just part of the classes of things they describe. Second, in addition to quantity, propositions may be distinguished by their quality. That is, they may be categorized as either affirmative or negative assertions. On the one hand, affirmative propositions state positively that something is true. In everyday speech we might say something like, This dog is mine. This is a particular and affirmative statement. It affirms that one particular dog is one of many things that belong to me. In systematic theology, a proposition like, Some biblical passages teach about sanctification is also a particular affirmative proposition because it states that at least some biblical texts fall into this category. A universal and affirmative statement in ordinary life would include something like: Everything I lost is important to me. Because it states positively that everything I lost is at least part of what is important to me. Systematic theologians often make similar statements in their field of study. For instance, consider the statement Everything that was created was created by God. This proposition affirms that everything that was created is in the set of things that are created by God. On the other hand, propositions may also have a negative quality and they may be either universal or particular. For instance, when I say, This house is not my house. I state a particular and negative proposition. And if I want to make a universal and negative proposition, I might say something like, No one in the room speaks English. Negative claims also appear in systematic theology. For instance, Jesus was not a sinner is a negative and particular proposition. It denies something about the one person, Jesus. And we also find universal negatives in theology, such as the statement, No one who remains an unbeliever can be saved. No persistent unbelievers are included among those who will receive salvation. These distinctions in quantity and quality are important to keep in mind as we study systematic theology. To confuse them can lead to all kinds of serious misunderstandings of what theologians are claiming. Now we should turn to the third dimension of our definition: theological propositions make theological claims. Theological As we put it in our definition, theological propositions dont just make factual claims they make factual theological claims. Now its true that systematic theologians refer to facts of history and to philosophical concepts that dont fit neatly under the rubric of theology. But their main subject matter is theology. Now to understand what we mean by theological facts, we must remember that theology is a rather broad topic. Youll recall that Thomas Aquinas defined theology as having two main concerns. In book I, chapter 1, section 7 of his Summa Theologica, Aquinas called theology sacred doctrine, and defined it as: A unified science in which all things are treated under the aspect of God either because they are God himself or because they refer to God. Aquinas words reflect a common distinction in systematic theology between theology proper, which is the study of God himself, and general theology, the study of other subjects as they relate to God. In line with this common distinction, systematics focuses on both of these levels of theology. On the one hand, systematicians focus attention on theology proper by making statements that directly concern God. They say things like: God is holy, or God created the world. But on the other hand, in a broader sense, systematic theologians also concern themselves with general theology, claims about aspects of creation as they relate to God. Regarding salvation, they often say things like, Salvation is by the grace of God. Or concerning the condition of humanity, they often say things like, All people living today are sinners. In this sense, theological propositions address more subjects than God himself, but always, at least implicitly, in the context of their relationship to God. In the fourth place, its important to note that systematic theologians seek to express their views with heightened concern for being direct or straightforward. Direct Of course, we all realize that no description of anything, certainly not of God, is absolutely perfect. But at the same time, systematicians strive to be as direct as possible as they form theological propositions. It would be quite unusual for a systematic theologian simply to say: The Lord is a shepherd, and to leave it at that. This statement is true to the Scriptures, but systematicians tend to avoid indirect ways of putting things like metaphors and other figures of speech. So, rather than saying, The Lord is a shepherd, systematicians tend to restate the matter more directly by saying something like, God has special providential care for his people. They want to express themselves as much as possible in explicit, straightforward, prosaic, propositions. To sum up, we need to keep in mind that we are focusing on a rather specific kind of expression that dominates systematic theology. For our purposes, we may think of theological expressions as indicative sentences that assert as directly as possible at least one factual theological claim. With our basic definition in mind, we should turn to a second facet of our general orientation toward this subject: what is the justification for building theology with propositions? What makes this process legitimate? Legitimacy Throughout church history, Christians have often expressed their faith in the form of straightforward statements. Listen for instance to the opening of the fourth-century Nicene Creed: I believe in One God, the Father Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth, and of all things visible and invisible. The Nicene Creed also lists a number of other very important theological propositions. It and many similar creeds have been endorsed by Christians throughout the centuries. At the same time, throughout history there have been those who have questioned the legitimacy of using theological propositions. For our purposes, we will mention two major objections that have been raised: on the one hand, challenges that rise from the doctrine of divine incomprehensibility; and on the other hand, challenges of modern scientific rationalism. Consider first how the doctrine of Gods incomprehensibility has raised questions. Divine Incomprehensibility Were all familiar with the well-known words of Isaiah 55:8-9, the bedrock of this doctrine. For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts (Isaiah 55:8-9). Unfortunately, in many circles, this and similar passages have been used to support the idea that God is so far beyond our mental capacities that we simply cannot describe him. In this view, to say that God is love is to try to speak of something that really cannot be described. To say that Jesus is the only way of salvation is to limit God without justification. Now this kind of thinking has taken many forms throughout history. For instance, many theologians have argued that the only way to say anything about God is to follow the via negativa the way of negation. In this view, we cannot make positive statements about God. We can only deny things about him by contrasting him with creation. We can only say things like, God is not limited by space. God is not bound by time. God is not physical. Throughout history, a variety of skeptical, agnostic theologians have argued that we are simply not capable of positively describing God or things in relation to him. In contrast with these misleading outlooks, as followers of Christ we must evaluate the legitimacy of theological propositions by the testimony of Scripture. Traditional systematic theologians follow the Scriptures by speaking of the incomprehensibility of God alongside the fact that God can be known when he reveals himself. On the one side, we cant know God fully, but on the other side, we can know him in part when he reveals himself to us. And this partial knowledge of God is still true knowledge. One passage in Scripture makes this distinction clear: Deuteronomy 29:29. In this verse, Moses summarized the matter this way for Israel: The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law (Deuteronomy 29:29). Notice that there are two categories of things in view here. On the one side, Moses spoke of secret things. These are matters that God does not reveal to humanity, the knowledge of which he reserves only for himself. In fact, we must always remind ourselves that the secret, unrevealed things are infinite in scope. At the same time, notice that Moses did not simply say that God keeps secrets from us. He also said that some things are revealed. That is, God has revealed them in his word. And as Moses put it, these revealed things belong to us and to our children forever. In other words, God expects us to believe and wholeheartedly to embrace what he has revealed. And this fact shows that it is legitimate to state what he has revealed. In addition to challenges that rise out of the doctrine of incomprehensibility, the legitimacy of theological propositions has also been challenged by modern scientific rationalism. Modern Scientific Rationalism In the last two centuries, the centuries of modern scientism, many different schools of thought have argued that theology is a pseudo or fake science. That is to say, systematic theologians may claim to state objective truths, but this is mere pretense. In modern sciences, when we want to know the truth of a matter, we form hypotheses and subject those hypotheses to empirical validation. And once a hypothesis has stood the test of direct or indirect empirical validation, we then accept it as true. But scientists have been quick to point out that theological propositions cannot be tested in this way. Now, we should all admit that at least in one sense this is true. While we can place a liquid in a test tube and analyze its qualities, no one can put God in a test tube to see if God is Trinity. While we can use instruments to calculate the size of things, there is no instrument that can measure God to see if he is infinite. For this reason, many modern people have argued that at best, theologians are like artists and poets, who project their feelings, religious intuitions and sentiments. Were only fooling ourselves and others when we act as if we are describing objective facts. But there is a sense in which we can verify theological propositions empirically. Its all a matter of what we count as empirical evidence for and against our viewpoints. As followers of Christ, were committed to following the standards of verification in theology that he followed. And just how did Jesus validate his own theological claims? How did he test the theological propositions of others? To be sure, Jesus relied on general revelation; the revelation of God in all things. Jesus also relied on the illumination of the Holy Spirit, just as we should today. But Jesus taught that the infallible Scriptures are the clearest and most authoritative source of evidence for testing theological viewpoints. When Jesus wanted to test theological claims, he most frequently turned to Scripture as his empirical standard. For example, in Matthew 15:7, when Jesus challenged the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, he did so by referring to Scripture. There we read these words: You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you (Matthew 15:7). While Jesus did not put God himself in a test tube, he did put theological ideas to the test. He measured theological proposals by carefully evaluating them by the empirical standard of Scripture. As followers of Christ, we must not accept the charge that theology proposes ideas about God without any empirical validation. From a Christian point of view, the claims of systematic theology are more than the expression of religious sentiments. They are proven and disproven by the empirical test of Scripture. Now that we have seen what theological propositions are and how they are legitimate ways of expressing theological facts, we should turn to a third consideration: the place they have in building systematic theology. Place In previous lessons weve seen that Protestant systematic theology followed many of the priorities that medieval theologians had developed as they interacted with Aristotelian philosophy. And as a result, building systematic theology requires four main steps: the formation of technical terms, the formation of propositions, doctrinal statements, and a comprehensive system of beliefs. Now, we always have to remember that speaking this way is somewhat artificial. Systematicians actually involve themselves in all of these steps all the time. But for the sake of clarity, it helps to think of the process as moving from the simplest to the most complex elements of this effort. At the lowest level, theological technical terms comprise the most basic building blocks of systematic theology. Without carefully defined terminology it would be very difficult to construct sound systematic theology. The second step in the process is the formation of propositions. If we think of technical terms as the basic building blocks of systematics, then we may rightly think of propositions as rows of blocks that explain and elaborate on technical terms. Systematic theologians create these rows of blocks by making statements about God and creation in relation to him. And if we think of propositions as rows of blocks, then we may describe doctrinal statements as portions of walls or whole walls constructed out of these rows of propositions. And finally, the system of theology represents the ways theologians construct an entire building out of doctrinal statements. This analogy suggests the essential place propositions hold in the construction of systematic theology they are rows of carefully laid blocks that become part of the entire edifice called systematic theology. Take, for instance, the statement Jesus is the second person of the Trinity. This claim is built with at least two technical terms: person and Trinity. But this proposition does not leave these terms and their related concepts disconnected, instead, theyre brought together into a straightforward factual claim about Jesus. Now, from this and other propositions, systematic theologians go on to form the full doctrine of the Trinity. And the doctrine of the Trinity is a part of the doctrine of God, which is a wall in the building that is the entire system of Christian theology. It is important to remember that when systematic theologians discuss or write about theology, they employ all kinds of rhetorical techniques. They propose ideas and support them with evidence. They support and scrutinize the ideas of others. They ask rhetorical questions. They trace the historical developments of ideas. They expose motivations and point to the positive and negative consequences of various positions. A large array of rhetorical techniques is at their fingertips. But, theological propositions undergird all of the explanations, arguments, defenses and persuasive techniques that we find in systematics. And they form an essential part of the process of building systematic theology. Now that we have a general orientation toward propositions in systematics, we should turn to our second major topic: the formation of theological propositions. How do systematic theologians form the propositions with which they build their theology? FORMATION The processes experienced theologians follow as they create their propositions are enormously complex. So, as we explore how theyre created, we must keep in mind that our discussion will be somewhat artificial. Even so, well highlight some of the important dimensions of these processes that will help us build systematic theology much more responsibly. Well look in two basic directions. First, well touch on propositions that derive from the ways systematicians interact with philosophy. And second, well look in more detail at the ways systematicians form propositions from the bible. Lets consider first the fact that many propositions in systematic theology actually stem from philosophy. Philosophical Interactions Youll recall from previous lessons that in the patristic period, many Christian theologians believed that many aspects of Neo-Platonism were true to Scripture. So, they expressed their beliefs with an orientation toward that philosophy. In the medieval period, the vast majority of Christian scholars believed that Aristotelian philosophy was true to Scripture in many significant ways. So, many of the things they said were shaped by Aristotelian perspectives. And even in Protestant systematic theology, various modern philosophies have, for better or worse, provided important orientations. And as a result, many claims that appear in systematic theology stem from philosophical discussions. Now, we have to be careful as we notice that many propositions derive from such philosophical roots, because the Scriptures both warn us against philosophy and encourage us to use it. On the one side, we should give heed to warnings like 1 Corinthians 1:20, where the apostle Paul mocked non-Christian philosophy: Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? (1 Corinthians 1:20). Its critical that Christian theologians remember the basic antithesis between Christian theology and non-Christian philosophies. But at the same time, in Acts 17:27-28 Paul demonstrated a positive use for philosophical reflection by drawing from the words of the Greek philosophical poets Clianthus and Aerates: God is not far from each of us As some of your own poets have said, We are his offspring (Acts 17:27-28). This passage demonstrates that although we must be aware of the dangers, Christian theologians have been right to interact with various philosophies. And theyve been right even to incorporate true theological claims that stem from philosophical discussions even as Paul did when he was in Athens. Although we should be aware of these philosophical roots, the Bible is by far the most important source for theological propositions in systematics. For this reason we should give special attention to the ways systematicians form their theological claims from what the Bible teaches. Interpretation of Scripture To accomplish this goal well look in three directions: First, well consider the challenges that systematicians face in this regard. Second, well see how systematicians meet one aspect of these challenges through a process that we will call, factual reduction. And third, well explore how systematicians meet another aspect of these challenges through factual collation. Lets look first at the challenges that systematicians face as they form propositions from the bible. Challenges When students of theology first begin to study systematics they often have the impression that creating theological propositions from the Bible is a simple matter. They think that we only need to read the bible and to repeat what it says. Sometimes this is true because the bible does include some propositions, but there are also many significant challenges. In addition to the effects of human finitude and sin, the Scriptures themselves present at least two challenges to forming theological propositions. One challenge rises out of the literary variety we find in the bible. And another challenge rises out of the doctrinal arrangement of the Bible. Consider first the difficulties that systematicians face because of the literary variety of the Scriptures. The Bible is not a flat literary terrain repeating the same kind of material over and over. Instead, a number of genres appear throughout the Bible and combine with each other in countless ways. The bible contains mixtures of narrative, law, poetry, prophecy, and epistles to name just a few. Within each of these larger genres are different kinds of expressions: statements, commands, questions, complaints, encouragements, exclamations, benedictions, quotations, lists, statutes, titles, technical instructions, signatures. The list goes on, and on, and on. And along with these varieties are countless figures of speech and other literary subtleties that flavor Scripture in many different ways. This great literary variety complicates the formation of theological propositions. Imagine for a moment that the Bible were a book consisting of only of straightforward propositions, simply listing one theological fact after another. If this were the case, then using the bible in systematic theology would be relatively easy. But of course, Scripture is not like this; its literarily diverse. Now imagine that systematic theologians were inclined to express their theology with great literary variety. Imagine that their theologies were filled with poetry, narratives, commands, epistles, complaints, figures of speech and the like. If this were so, then once again the presentation of Scripture and systematics would fit nicely with each other. But of course, this is not the case either. The fact is that the Bible is literarily diverse, but systematicians express the Bibles teaching almost exclusively in propositions. In effect, systematicians have to squeeze all the various types of literature they encounter in the Bible into one specific kind of expression. And this disparity is one of the greatest challenges facing systematic theologians. A second challenge that Scripture presents to systematic theologians is the way it arranges or doesnt arrange its doctrines. In a word, the Scriptures do not deal with particular themes in complete, discrete units. Instead, the same topic is often addressed in bits and pieces scattered here and there throughout the Bible. And this characteristic of Scripture also challenges systematic theologians. Imagine that the Bible were different in this regard. Suppose that it dealt completely with one doctrine at a time. Suppose the bible regularly dealt with one theme, thoroughly discussed it, and then moved on to the next theme. If this were so, then perhaps systematic theologians could simply read each portion of the Bible and easily form theological claims based on each part of the Bible. But of course, this is not how the bible presents its theological themes. Or imagine that systematic theologians were less orderly, touching on one small aspect of a subject at a time, and suppose they commonly addressed many other bits and pieces of other doctrines before returning to address a second small aspect of the first doctrine. If they were satisfied to address a matter here and there in bits and pieces, then perhaps it would be relatively easy for them to work with Scripture. But of course, this is not what systematicians want to do. They want to present the teachings of Scripture as fully and as orderly as they can. And as a result, they have to work hard to combine information from all kinds of places in the Scriptures. The Scriptures touch on aspects of theological topics in various ways in different places and this feature of the bibles presentation of theology is another great challenge for systematic theologians. Now that weve seen two of the main challenges systematicians face as they work with Scripture, we should turn our attention to the process of factual reduction. This is the strategy systematicians use to overcome the challenge of literary variety in the Bible. Factual Reduction In simple terms: Factual reduction is the process of focusing on theological facts that biblical passages teach, and marginalizing other dimensions of these same passages. As with human language in general, passages in the Bible were designed to have manifold impacts on their readers. They informed, inspired, accused, motivated, directed, encouraged, discouraged, delighted, perplexed, corrected, trained, facilitated, blessed, cursed, stirred the imagination, and so on and so on. Now not all passages in the Bible were designed to do all of these things, all of the time and certainly not with equal force, but every biblical passage of significant length was designed to have a variety of impacts. But systematic theologians focus their attention primarily, if not exclusively, on the theological facts taught in Scripture. In other words, systematicians reduce their attention to factual considerations, while other features of biblical texts go largely unattended. Now, the process of reducing Scripture to its facts is relatively straightforward when biblical passages were designed primarily to assert factual claims. In these situations, systematicians simply note the explicit and implicit facts presented in a biblical text, and then focus on those facts that are pertinent to their discussions. Take 2 Timothy 3:16 as an example of a passage that focuses on facts. There Paul said: All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16). Now, in the larger context, we can tell that this verse was designed to be much more than a mere catalogue of facts about the Bible. Paul connected this verse to the preceding context as a motivation for Timothy to pay careful attention to the Scriptures. At the very least, this verse was designed to encourage and to motivate Timothy to renew his commitments to the Scriptures. But a prominent dimension of this complex design was to make a number of explicit theological assertions. And systematic theologians make much use of this passage because theyre interested in these factual theological claims. The explicit facts of this passage can be summarized in a series of universal and affirmative propositions: All Scripture is God-breathed. All Scripture is useful for teaching. All Scripture is useful for rebuking. All Scripture is useful for correcting. All Scripture is useful for training. These propositions reflect the factual considerations communicated explicitly by this verse. In addition to these explicit claims, this verse logically entails a number of implicit claims that are also of interest to systematicians. For instance, its fair to say that God desired to communicate his will. This passage also implies that attention to Scripture is vital to sanctification. And even though Paul spoke specifically of the Scriptures of the Old Testament, he implied that the New Testament Scriptures are also inspired and useful in these ways. With these explicit and implicit theological facts delineated, systematicians can then use these truths to explain and defend their treatments of various theological topics. As you can imagine, this verse frequently appears in systematic theology to support claims about the doctrine of Scripture. For instance, in the second chapter of his Systematic Theology Robert Reymond referred to 2 Timothy 3:16 to support his claim that the Scriptures are inerrant. There he wrote: Biblical writers claim inerrancy for the written Word of God which he gave to humankind through them by inspiration. This kind of statement is a typical way this verse is used in systematics. But the explicit and implicit theological facts taught in 2 Timothy 3:16 also address other traditional theological topics. For example, systematicians may refer to this passage under the rubric of theology proper as evidence that God is merciful because he revealed himself to humanity. They may use it in the doctrine of ecclesiology to establish that the reading and the preaching of Scripture is a means of grace in the church. They may also refer to it under the rubric of eschatology to establish the reliability of biblical prophecy. The possibilities are endless. With biblical passages that are very similar to theological propositions, the process of factual reduction is relatively simple. When we read in Genesis 1:1, that God created all things, its not difficult to infer the fact that God is the Creator. When we read in Isaiah 6:3, that the Seraphim cried, Holy, holy, holy before the Lord, its simple to conclude that God is Holy. When we read in Romans 3:28 that justification is by faith apart from works, we may bring this statement into our discussion of Soteriology. Many passages in Scripture make claims that are easily brought into systematic theology. And not surprisingly, systematicians frequently draw from these kinds of passages. But the process of factual reduction is a bit more complex when biblical passages are not so similar to theological propositions. Ideally, in these situations systematicians take care to notice the literary features of passages so that they can identify the facts that these passages teach. Then they use those delineated facts in their discussions of theology. For instance, Proverbs sometimes appeared to be simple theological propositions, but they usually are not. Take a look at Proverbs 23:13-14 where we read these words: Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you punish him with the rod, he will not die. Punish him with the rod and save his soul from death (Proverbs 23:13-14). Now at first glance this proverb appears to make two factual claims. It says of a child who is disciplined, he will not die. And it says that a father who disciplines his son will save the sons soul from death. But in the genre of proverb, statements like these are almost never straightforward propositions. A careful interpreter will see that these verses are not making straightforward claims or guarantees about the effectiveness of discipline. Instead, these verses encourage wise fathers to discipline their children because discipline tends to produce positive outcomes in their childrens lives. In fact, as the first portions of these verses indicate, this proverb was designed primarily as an exhortation to fathers. The sage said, Do not withhold discipline, punish him. Fathers are advised here to discipline their children. With these issues in mind, systematicians can delineate a number of implicit facts. For instance, under the doctrine of anthropology, systematicians could use this passage as evidence that children are sinful. Under the rubric of sanctification, they could use it to establish that parental discipline is designed for growth in holiness. Interestingly enough, at least one systematic theologian actually used this passage to support a point of view in eschatology. In the third chapter of part 6 in his Systematic Theology Louis Berkof used Proverbs 23:14 to bring to light an aspect of the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead. He said this: Certainly evidences are not wanting that there was a belief in the resurrection long before the exile. It is implied in the passages that speak of a deliverance from Sheol. Here, Berkhof concluded that the words save his soul from death, in Proverbs23:14, implied that faithful Israelites in the Old Testament believed in the general resurrection of the dead. Through significant factual reduction Berkhof supported an aspect of eschatology with a passage primarily designed to encourage fathers to discipline their children. Now, at times focusing on facts can be even more reductionistic. For example, youll recall that systematic theologians tend to state things as directly as possible. So, if a passage employs figures of speech, systematicians tend to explain what those figures of speech mean plainly. Consider this kind of dramatic factual reduction in the 48th chapter of Millard Ericksons Christian Theology where he discussed the Word of God as a means of grace. He noted a series of metaphors and similes for Gods word that appear in an assortment of biblical passages. As he put it: There is a rich series of images depicting the nature and function of the Word of God a hammer a mirror a seed rain and snow milk strong meat gold and silver a lamp a sword [and] a fire. Now the fact that Erickson even mentioned these images is a bit unusual for systematic theology. Yet, we should notice that rather than exploring the rich imaginative impact these images were to have on readers, he summed them up through factual reduction in a simple straightforward proposition. As he put it: These images graphically convey the idea that the Word of God is powerful and able to accomplish great work in the life of the individual. Now I cant imagine anyone seriously disagreeing with his assessment, but its also clear that this assessment is the product of extensive factual reduction, marginalizing the wider impact of these images in favor of simply stating a fact that they proved. As you can imagine, the process of factual reduction works this way with many passages. For instance, we can draw from the first commandment, in Exodus 20:3 where God says there should be no other gods before Him, that the God of Scripture is supreme over all other supernatural powers. We can conclude from the first verse of Psalms 105, which calls for praise to God, that God is worthy of praise. Even when biblical passages were designed to have manifold impacts on their readers, systematicians almost always focus on factual content, and explain these facts in direct theological propositions. Systematicians overcome the challenge of the variety of biblical literature through the process of factual reduction. But they deal with the challenge of the bibles doctrinal arrangement through a process we will call factual collation. Factual Collation Because the teachings of Scripture on particular topics are scattered throughout the Bible, systematicians have to collate or collect passages from all over the Bible as they form their propositions. Its not uncommon to see passages from Genesis set alongside passages from Romans, or portions of the Psalms next to verses from James, or sections of Matthew alongside Revelation. Passages are gathered from very different parts of the Bible and associated with each other because they teach related theological facts. This process of collating facts from different portions of Scripture follows many different patterns, but for the sake of simplicity well speak of two main ways this is done. On the one hand, some passages are collated, gathered together because they repeat the same facts. On the other hand, some passages are collated or gathered because together, they compose a complex theological claim. Lets unpack these two processes. In the first place, systematicians often form theological propositions by drawing from passages that repeat the same basic idea. We think this way many times in everyday life. Suppose you suspect youve lost some money. What do you do? You may count the money in your pocket once. But if youre still not sure, you might count it again and again until youre fully convinced that you either did or did not lose the money. Well, in many ways, this is what systematic theologians do when they collate Scriptures that repeat the same theological facts. They may suspect that theyve understood a passage correctly. They may believe that they formed a true theological proposition from it. So, they look at many parts of the bible to see if the same motif can be discovered there as well. For example, when Louis Berkhof discussed the deity of Christ in the eighth chapter of the first part of his Systematic Theology he claimed this: [The Bible] explicitly asserts the deity of the Son. But because Berkhof was aware that many people have denied this claim, he did not support his view with just one passage. Instead, he pointed out that this theological fact is explicitly asserted in John 1:1, in John 20:28, in Romans 9:5, Philippians 2:6, Titus 2:13, and 1 John 5:20. In this case, Berkhof collated verses from five different books in the New Testament because they repeated the same teaching. Most of us have heard the principle that we should always seek support for major doctrines from a variety of passages in Scripture. The reason for following this principle is that its easy to misunderstand a single biblical reference. One way to confirm that weve understood the claim of one passage correctly is to show that the same claim is repeated in other parts of the Bible. In other lessons weve spoken of theological certainty using a model that we called the cone of certainty. We noted that responsible Christian theologians are not simply interested in determining what to believe, but also in coordinating the strength of their convictions with the strength of the evidence for those convictions. In many respects, this is why we collate verses that repeat the same theological fact. When we cannot find repetitive scriptural support for a proposition, we should normally lower our confidence in that proposition. But seeing a fact repeated over and over in the Scriptures is an ordinary way we can gain more confidence. As important as repetitive collation may be, systematicians also collate biblical passages to form composite support for a theological proposition. In other words, systematicians find various factual claims throughout the Bible, and collect these to form larger, multifaceted theological assertions. Lets illustrate the process of compositional collation with an example from everyday life. Imagine that Im about to go outside and I hear thunder and suspect that its raining. How do I confirm that suspicion? Well, one way is to notice other things that confirm it. When a friend comes running in and is drenched with water, I am more convinced that its raining. If my friend hands me his wet umbrella, then Im even more convinced that its raining. And then if he says, Its raining cats and dogs outside, Im going to be so fully convinced that I wont even think about going outside without my own umbrella. These observations are not repetitive; I hear thunder; I see my soaked friend; I touch his umbrella; and I receive an explicit report. Each one of these evidences contributes something different, and together they compose evidence that convinces me that my suspicion was true. In many ways, systematicians follow a similar pattern of compositional collation. They note that one thing is taught in one passage. Then they notice that another related matter is claimed in another passage. Then they find other passages that teach other relevant ideas. Then they gather all of this information together to form a theological proposition composed of all these theological facts. To see how this process works, lets return to Berkhofs discussion of the deity of Christ in Chapter 8 of part 1 of his Systematic Theology. Weve already seen that he noted the repetition of explicit claims that Christ is divine when he said that the Bible explicitly asserts the deity of the Son. But his theological proposition that Christ is fully divine is also supported by compositional collation of related but different claims that he discovered from many parts of Scripture. He continued in this way: [The Bible also] applies divine names to him ascribes to Him divine attributes speaks of Him as doing divine works and accords Him divine honor. Berkhofs conclusion that Christ is God was not based on any of these claims individually, but on the aggregate of all of these theological claims. It isnt difficult to understand why Berkhof did this. The belief that Christ is divine has been challenged by many interpreters of Scripture. So, it wasnt adequate simply to show that some verses explicitly assert his deity. He wanted to confirm that he had understood these verses correctly by adding the support of other considerations. The fact that the Scriptures attribute to Christ divine names; that they ascribe divine attributes to him, like omnipresence, and omniscience, that they speak of him doing things that God does like creating and sustaining all things; that they give him honor that is due only to God, like worship and prayer. These biblical factual claims come together to compose compelling evidence that Berkhof had a true theological proposition: the proposition that Christ is divine. So, it is that systematic theologians form theological propositions from the Scriptures first by reducing their focus to the facts asserted in biblical passages. And second by collating passages from various parts of Scripture. By these means systematicians are able to have confidence that they have formed theological propositions that are true to Scripture. Now that weve gained a general orientation toward theological propositions and weve seen how systematicians form them, were ready to turn to our third main topic: the values and dangers of theological propositions in systematic theology. VALUES AND DANGERS As we explore this matter, well follow the pattern of previous lessons in this series by looking at the effects of propositions on the three major resources for building Christian theology. Youll recall that Christians are to build theology out of Gods special and general revelation. We gain understanding of special revelation primarily through the exegesis of Scripture, and we avail ourselves of important dimensions of general revelation by focusing on interaction in community, learning from others, especially other Christians, and by focusing on Christian living; our experiences of living for Christ. Because these resources are so critical, well explore the values and dangers of theological propositions in terms of each of them. Well look first at propositions and Christian living; second, well explore propositions in relation to interaction in community; and third, well examine propositions in connection with the exegesis of Scripture. Lets look first at the theological resource of Christian living. Christian Living Christian living amounts to the process of personal sanctification, and weve seen in other lessons that personal sanctification takes place on conceptual, behavioral and emotional levels. Or as weve put it: on the levels of orthodoxy, orthopraxis and orthopathos. Time will not allow us to explore all the ways theological propositions affect these various aspects of sanctification. So, well limit ourselves to one major way they can enhance and one major way they can hinder Christian living. Lets look first at one way theological propositions can enhance our attempts to live for Christ. Enhancement One of the greatest advantages of traditional theological propositions is that they clearly and succinctly express many crucial aspects of our faith. In our day, most Christians are unable to articulate what they believe with much precision. And because we cant make sound summaries of our beliefs, we often have difficulty living for Christ in our daily lives. I remember once talking with a young woman who didnt know how to make a decision about her church. She felt uneasy about the fact that her church tolerated some immoral lifestyles among its members, but she didnt want to leave. She came to me and said, I dont know what to do. I get so much from the preaching that I dont want to stop going to my church. How can I make a decision? So, I asked her, What do you think the marks of the true church are? She looked at me with a blank stare and finally said, I dont know. So, I followed up this way, I dont think youll be able to decide what to do about your church until you decide what you believe characterizes the true church. Then I told her, Protestant theology teaches that there are three marks of the true church. Theyre the faithful preaching of the word, the faithful administration of the sacraments, and the faithful practice of church discipline. Her response was remarkable. She said to me I wish someone had told me this before. I just didnt know what to think. In the modern world, Christians often dont want to take the time to learn even the most basic theological claims that Christianity makes. So, they substitute sentiment or uninformed opinion for well-formed theological propositions. But the result of this is often the same: when we have important decisions to make, moral choices that we face every day, we dont know what to do because were not able to articulate well-formed theological propositions. Traditional systematic theology has given us many propositions that are true to Scripture. And learning them is one of the most helpful things Christians can do as they seek to live for Christ. Now, as positive as it can be to become familiar with traditional theological propositions, its also the case that overemphasizing them or relying too heavily on them can actually hinder Christian living. Hindrance One way this is true is that Christians who study systematics often think that an extensive set of theological propositions is all they need to make practical decisions in the Christian life. Now, as weve already seen, theological propositions can be very helpful. But at the same time, we must always remember that there is a gap between the standard propositions of theology and the choices we have to make as Christians. Theological propositions are typically rather abstract or about matters other than those were facing. So they do not directly address the specifics of the situations we face. And as result, they cannot offer sufficient guidance for the practical decisions we must make. Unfortunately, believers who become overly invested in propositions often dont realize how great this gap is. They convince themselves that all they have to do is to think logically about a set of propositions, and then everything will make perfectly good sense. But in reality, in every decision we make as Christians we must depend not only on theological formulations, but also on things like the details of our situation and the personal ministry of the Holy Spirit. We must use these aspects of general revelation to fill in the gap between theological principles and real-life decisions. Let me return to the example of the young woman who was thinking about leaving her church. As soon as she heard the three marks of the church faithful preaching, faithful administration of the sacraments and the faithful exercise of church discipline, she quickly made up her mind to leave her church. But I immediately cautioned her. I warned her, Wait a minute. You need to realize something. No church anywhere in the world has the three marks of the church perfectly. You need to look carefully at your church and decide just how bad things are. And more than this, you also need to spend time in prayer, seeking the leading of the Holy Spirit so you can make a firm decision. Only then can you leave in good conscience. In a word, I was telling that young woman that as important as theological propositions were in her circumstance, relying only on theological propositions could actually hinder her Christian living. Before acting, she needed to look to general revelation. She needed to understand her situation well, and to submit herself to the personal ministry of the Spirit. In addition to understanding how theological propositions can bring advantages and disadvantages to Christian living, we should also be aware of how they influence our interaction in community. Interaction in Community Interaction in community helps us focus on the importance of the body of Christ in our lives. In these lessons, weve spoken of three important dimensions of interaction within the Christian community: Christian heritage the witness of the Holy Spirits work in the church of the past; present Christian community the witness of the Holy Spirit in Christians living today; and private judgment the witness of the Holy Spirit working in our personal conclusions and convictions. These dimensions of community interact with each other in countless ways. Well briefly mention just a couple of thoughts about the ways theological propositions can enhance and hinder these elements of community interaction. Lets look first at one important way theological propositions can enhance interaction in community. Enhancement As sad as it is, many evangelical Christians in our day bounce from one church to another, from one preacher or teacher to another, with little ability to determine how they should interact with those churches and preachers. We dont know whom to follow. We cant discern the positives and negatives of a church. This lack of discernment commonly stems from ignorance of the basic factual claims of the Christian faith. Becoming aware of the fundamental theological propositions of systematic theology is one of the best ways to become a more discerning follower of Christ. One very practical way to take advantage of sound theological propositions is to become acquainted with some Protestant catechisms. Catechisms like the Heidelberg Catechism, or the Westminster Shorter Catechism offer short theological propositions that are easy to learn. And with these theological views in hand, followers of Christ can be more discerning. For instance, if someone wants to discuss the purpose or goal of life, its extremely helpful to know the first question and answer of the Westminster Shorter Catechism. Listen to the way it summarizes a great deal of biblical teaching in one simple sentence. In answer to the question: What is the chief end of man? The catechism responds: Mans chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever. Suppose someone comes up with a novel outlook on how Christians can have comfort in life, its very helpful to know the first question and answer to the Heidelberg catechism. The first question is: What is your only comfort in life and in death? And the catechism answers this way: That I am not my own, but belong body and soul, in life and in death to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ. He has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood, and has set me free from the tyranny of the devil. He also watches over me in such a way that not a hair can fall from my head without the will of my Father in heaven: in fact, all things must work together for my salvation. Because I belong to him, Christ, by his Holy Spirit, assures me of eternal life and makes me wholeheartedly willing and ready from now on to live for him. Learning solid theological viewpoints like these can equip us to be much more discerning as we interact with other Christians. And in this way, they greatly enhance our interaction in community. At the same time, while understanding sound theological propositions can enhance interaction by making us more discerning, focusing on theological propositions can also hinder interaction among Christians. Hindrance Sometimes Christians so closely attach themselves to a set of propositions that they have a difficult time interacting in positive ways with other believers who may not say things in exactly the same way. You see, theres a problem with theological propositions that we often forget: most of them are not quotations from the Bible. Instead, they are the products of human interpretation. They attempt to summarize biblical teachings as accurately as possible. But as weve seen in this lesson, sometimes they result from very complex processes. Even the best theological propositions are limited in scope. And all are flawed in one way or another. Consequently, as we learn more about the theological propositions of systematic theology, we must always temper our attachment to them with the knowledge that they are not inspired, they are not infallible, and their authority is not as great as the Bibles. I remember once talking with a friend who said he had no Christian friends. He complained of being lonely. So, I asked him if he had fellowship with anyone. He told me, I cant find anyone who agrees with what I believe. So, I dont have any fellowship. I responded this way, Do you mean you cant find anyone who believes in Christ? Oh no, not that, he replied. I just cant find anyone who agrees with me on everything. I was dismayed by this friend. He should have known that Christians have never agreed on every detail of theology. But sadly, this friend of mine had terrible priorities. He had placed so much emphasis on theological propositions, that it completely hindered his ability to fellowship with others. Throughout the centuries, the cause of Christ has suffered tremendous harm when Christians have allowed their theological commitments to hinder their interactions with other Christians. When we insist that others conform to our beliefs on this or that subtle dimension of theological issue, we go far beyond the instructions of Scripture. Consider, in this regard, the words of the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 8:4-12. There we read these words about our theological commitments: We know that an idol is nothing But not everyone knows this. Some people are still so accustomed to idols their conscience is weak [I]f anyone with a weak conscience sees you who have this knowledge eating in an idols temple, won't he be emboldened to eat what has been sacrificed to idols?... When you sin against your brothers in this way you sin against Christ (1 Corinthians 8:4-12). Paul exhorted the knowledgeable Christians to love those who were not as knowledgeable, and to serve them. He even exhorted those who were knowledgeable to restrict acting on their knowledge to avoid causing others to stumble. Rather than encouraging division and elitism, Paul insisted that those with good theology find ways to fellowship with those whose theology was weak on non-essential topics. In short, he taught them that fellowship was more important than precision on non-essential theological propositions. Its time for all of us to learn how to work together with Christians who dont agree with us in every detail. Having seen some of the ways theological propositions relate to Christian Living and Interaction in Community, we should turn to the third major theological resource: the exegesis of Scripture. How do propositions in systematics affect our interpretation of the Bible? Exegesis of Scripture Exegesis is vital to building Christian theology because its our most direct access to Gods special revelation in Scripture. Weve suggested in another lesson that its helpful to think of three main ways the Holy Spirit has led the church to interpret the Scriptures. Weve dubbed these broad categories: literary analysis, historical analysis and thematic analysis. Literary analysis looks at the Scriptures as a picture, as artistic presentations designed by human authors to influence their original audiences through their distinctive literary features. Historical analysis looks at the Scriptures as a window to history, a way of seeing and learning from the ancient historical events that the Bible reports. And thematic analysis treats the Scriptures as a mirror, a way of reflecting on questions and topics that are of interest to us. With these contours of exegesis in mind, we should explore the ways theological propositions can enhance and hinder our interpretation of the Bible. Enhancement One of the most obvious ways propositions help us in exegesis is the way they clarify the theological claims that are spread throughout the Bible. If theres one thing thats true: the Bible is a complex book. Its various literary genres, historical references and theological teachings are so extensive that many Christians are unable to see much coherence in the Bible. And as a result, many of us are satisfied with searching and studying only small portions of the Scriptures to learn a few principles here and there from this passage or that passage. As soon as we begin to broaden our awareness of the bible, we find ourselves lost in confusion. Into this confusion comes the help of centuries of faithful interpretation represented by theological propositions of systematic theology. For centuries, well-informed Christians have searched the Scriptures to find the theological claims that appear there. And knowing those summaries of the teaching of Scripture can provide helpful guideposts for us as we make our way through the varied terrain of the Bible. I often recommend to students that one helpful way to enter into the teaching of any biblical passage is to look for the ways the passage touches on important theological themes that appear in systematic theology. Now, not every portion of the Bible will have something to say about every theological proposition, but reading a passage with basic theological propositions in mind will often help to provide an orientation toward a biblical passage. For instance, we might ask, What does Genesis 1 teach about God that systematic theologians emphasize? Well, among other things, it teaches that God is the creator of the universe. And what does it say about human beings that is emphasized in systematic theology? Well, it teaches that were creatures, that were the image of God, and that God has commanded us to exercise dominion over the earth. Learning how specific passages touch on the factual claims of systematic theology is one of the greatest enhancements of exegesis that systematics offers. As valuable as propositions may be for exegesis, we must also become aware of one of the most significant ways they can hinder our interpretation of Scripture. Hindrance Weve spoken already about the ways that systematic theologians interpret Scripture through factual reduction, how they focus on the explicit and implicit factual claims of biblical passages and marginalize other things the Scriptures have for us. But the fact is, God inspired Scripture to impact us on a variety of levels, and he did this because we need his guidance in all of these ways. So, when we habitually highlight only factual claims, we cut ourselves off from many things that God offers us in Scripture. We can speak of the various impacts that Scriptures were designed to have in many different ways. But one helpful approach is to speak of three interconnected dimensions of all biblical texts. In the first place, biblical passages have informative impact. That is to say, they convey explicit and implicit facts that we should know and believe. This is the strength of systematic theology. Its goal is to isolate and collate these facts into theological propositions. But at the same time, biblical passages also have directive impact. They give us explicit and implicit moral directions for our lives. This is most obvious when we approach passages that come in the form of commands. But even passages that are designed primarily to state information also imply moral responsibilities. Paul made this point very clearly in 2 Timothy 3:16-17. Listen to his words there once again: All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17). According to Paul, every biblical passage is designed to have some measure of directive impact. In the third place, biblical passages also have affective impact. They explicitly or implicitly target the emotions of readers. This function of Scripture is most obvious when we read highly emotional texts like the Psalms, or other passages where biblical writers emphasize emotions. But every biblical passage has the potential to touch us emotionally. Consider Matthew 22:37-40, where Jesus summarized the Old Testament in this way: Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments (Matthew22:37-40). In the Scriptures, love is a very emotional concept. And according to Jesus, it is fundamental to our faith. Biblical writers call for us to experience all sorts of holy emotions. They expect us to be motivated to hate sin and its consequences. They expect us to weep and to rejoice and to experience the full range of proper human emotions in response to what we see on the pages of Scripture. This manifold design of the Scriptures is the reason we must not restrict ourselves to looking for theological propositions in the Bible. Its important to get our facts straight. But its just as important to get our morals and our emotions straight as well. The riches of Scripture wait to be discovered through careful exegesis. But careful interpretation of the Bible must be broad enough to uncover all that the Scriptures offer us. So, it is that propositions in systematics offer us many values and many dangers. They can enhance Christian living, interaction in community, and the exegesis of Scripture in many ways. But they can also hinder our access to these three major theological resources. CONCLUSION In this lesson weve explored propositions and systematics. And weve come to a basic understanding of what they are and why they are important. Weve also seen how propositions are formed in systematic theology. And weve explored some of the values and dangers they present. Forming theological propositions is essential to the process of building systematic theology. We must know how to express and defend the facts of the Christian faith. For this reason, theological propositions have been crucial to building systematic theology throughout the centuries and they are vital to building sound systematic theology even today. Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. (Host) is Co-Founder and President of Third Millennium Ministries. He served as Professor of Old Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary for more than 20 years and was chair of the Old Testament department. An ordained minister, Dr. Pratt travels extensively to evangelize and teach. He studied at Westminster Theological Seminary, received his M.Div. from Union Theological Seminary, and earned his Th.D. in Old Testament Studies from Harvard University. Dr. Pratt is the general editor of the NIV Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible and a translator for the New Living Translation. He has also authored numerous articles and books, including Pray with Your Eyes Open, Every Thought Captive, Designed for Dignity, He Gave Us Stories, Commentary on 1 & 2 Chronicles and Commentary on 1 & 2 Corinthians. GLOSSARY Aquinas, Thomas (ca. 1225-1274) Italian theologian and Dominican friar who wrote Summa Theologica Berkhof, Louis (1873-1957) Influential Reformed theologian who wrote Systematic Theology in 1932 compositional collation Process of using several different arguments to defend a point of view Erickson, Millard (1932- ) Theologian and professor of Theology who wrote several books including Christian Theology factual collation Process of gathering passages from various parts of the Bible to form propositions factual reduction Process of focusing on only one point of a biblical passage and marginalizing other dimensions of the same passages incomprehensibility of God Term used in theology to express the fact that we can know some things about God as he reveals them to us, but we will never know everything about God Nicene Creed Creedwritten bya council held in Nicaea in A.D. 325; an expansion of the Apostles Creed that affirmed the doctrine of the Trinity and refuted Arianism repetitive collation The process of using a series of Bible passages with similarcontent to present an argument for a theological point of view Reymond, Robert (1932-2013) Reformed systematic theologian and professor who wrote A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith scientific rationalism Philosophical belief that human reason is the supreme judge of truth Shedd, William (1820-1894) Presbyterian theologian and professor of Systematic Theology who wrote Dogmatic Theology systematic theology/systematics A theological discipline that seeks to give a rational and orderly presentation of the doctrinal truths of Christianity theological proposition An indicative sentence that asserts as directly as possible at least one factual theological claim theology proper The doctrine or study of God; any theological matter that refers directly to God via negationis/via negativa Latin phrase for the way of negation, meaning to learn about God by contrasting him with his creation; part of the three-fold strategy developed by medieval Scholastic theologians for pursuing natural theology Westminster Confession of Faith An ecumenical doctrinal summary composed by the Westminster Assembly of Divines and published in 1647     ii. For videos, study guides and other resources, visit Thirdmill at thirdmill.org. For videos, study guides and other resources, visit Thirdmill at thirdmill.org.  PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT ii For videos, lesson guides and many other resources, please visit Thirdmill at thirdmill.org. For videos, study guides and many other resources, please visit  HYPERLINK "http://thirdmill.org/scribd" http://thirdmill.org/scribd Building Systematic Theology Lesson 3: Propositions in Sytematics The Gospels, Lesson One - PAGE 14- Third Millennium Ministries Introduction to the Gospels (www.thirdmill.org) - PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 26- For videos, lesson guides and other resources, visit Thirdmill at thirdmill.org. Building Systematic Theology Lesson Three Propositions in Systematics - PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1- For videos, study guides and many other resources, please visit Thirdmill at thirdmill.org. Building Systematic Theology Lesson 3 Propositions in Systematics      3 q r L M N Y ] ^ t x k Ǹ{gggU"hFSh(5CJOJQJ\^J'hFSh(5:B*OJQJ^Jph,SvhFSh(5CJOJQJ^Jh(9h(9CJOJQJ^JhFSh(CJOJQJ^JhFSh(B*CJaJphhFShYD'B*CJaJphhQB*aJphh@hQhQmHnHuhg7CJ aJ hmRCJ aJ jh^UmHnHu!   3q r M N ^ <$hx$d%d&d'd-DM N,SvO,SvP,SvQ,Sv]^ha$gd@3ddgd(ddgd(9ddgd#= $ !!a$gd#=  !!gd$a$gd gdQ$a$ ^ k SSS9hx$d%d&d'd-DM N,SvO,SvP,SvQ,Sv]^hgd#=<$hx$d%d&d'd-DM N,SvO,SvP,SvQ,Sv]^ha$gd@37h$d%d&d'd-DM N,SvO,SvP,SvQ,Sv]^hgd#=k   {|ͼͫyly^UhmHnHuhuh^JmHnHuh]h1nCJOJQJ!jh]h1nCJOJQJU(hh' E5B*CJ(OJQJ^Jph,Svh@35B*CJ(ph,Sv hFSh(0JCJOJQJ^J hFShB0JCJOJQJ^J)jhFShB0JCJOJQJU^JhFSh@3CJOJQJ^JhFSh(CJOJQJ^J'Ny@e/a^gd' E;hxx$d%d&d'd-DM N,SvO,SvP,SvQ,Sv]^hgd#= "򯇃{p{l{X{'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJhFSjhUjhUhhuh^J j{hUmHnHuhuh^JmHnHu>hG*h5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHphuhFSmHnHu jhUmHnHuhmHnHujhUmHnHu"#$%&'./0IJKLMNYZ[tuvwxyȽȲȧȜ}jhU'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJj]hUjhUjghUjhUhhuh^J$hG*hCJOJPJQJ^JaJhFSjhUjqhU1 !";<=>?@EFG`abcdenop׽sjhFSmHnHu jIhUmHnHujhUmHnHuhmHnHuhuh^JmHnHu'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJjhUhFSjShUhhuh^J$hG*hCJOJPJQJ^JaJjhU)*+-./@AB[\]_`arst˼˨ӝ˼˨Ӓ˼t˼j5hU$hG*hCJOJPJQJ^JaJjhUj?hU'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJhFSjhUjhUhhuh^J>hG*h5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHphu*Ǿvmii^Jmii'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJjhUhhuh^J>hG*h5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHphuhFSmHnHu j+hUmHnHujhUmHnHuhmHnHuhuh^JmHnHu$hG*hCJOJPJQJ^JaJhFSjhUjhU#M>h]Bgd_`gd_ @  v]^vgd%|gdPx @x@&gd1n!"#,-.GHIKLMefg  ȽȲȓȈ}j hUj hUj hU'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJj hUj hUhhuh^J$hG*hCJOJPJQJ^JaJhFSjhUj! hU189:<=>GHIbcdfghrst֩sjhFSmHnHu j hUmHnHujhUmHnHuhmHnHuhuh^JmHnHuj~ hU$hG*hCJOJPJQJ^JaJhFSj hUhhuh^J'hG*hCJOJPJQJ]^JaJjhU׸ɯubWN9(hP3vh}M5B*OJQJ^JaJ ph,Svhu'h!>^Jh#=hiN^JaJ$hRh1n5B*OJQJ^Jph,Svh1n5B*OJQJ^Jph,SvhU5B*OJQJ^Jph,Sv2jh]h1nB*CJOJQJU^JaJph,SvhFSmHnHu jt hUmHnHujhUmHnHuhmHnHu>hG*h5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmHnHphu]BiW X Y d e !'"(""""#O#`####g$h$$󪜺h_h_OJQJ]^Jh#=h_CJ OJQJ^Jh_h_5OJQJ^Jh#=h_5CJOJQJ^Jh_h_^Jh#=h_CJOJQJ^J h_h_OJQJ^JnHtHh_h_6OJQJ]^Jh_h_OJQJ^J,W X Y d e '"("""###g$h$%''''`gdN&_{gd_ v]^gd_gd_`gd_|gd_gd_$$$%%&&&&'''''(())))))*3++,,,,=->-?-G-H--..////00112233456678!9ɾɦ؜ئ،h_h_hlOJQJ^Jh#=OJQJ^Jh_h_^Jheh_CJ OJQJ^Jh_h_^J_H heh_CJOJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ]^JhN&_h_OJQJ^J7'()))))3+,=->-?-G-H-./01236!9;=>#?$?%?gd_gd_`gd_!99:;;<==>>#?$?%?1?2??r@@XAhAAAA6B7BBCCDDEFFFFFFFFGGHIIJJKKKKKKLLLLLMM MMMMNsOh_h_6OJQJ]^J!h_h_B*OJQJ^Jphh_h_6OJQJ^Jh_h_^Jhruh_CJOJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^J@%?1?2?r@AA6B7BCDFFFFFFGIJKKKKKLgd_gd_`gdN&_^gd_{gd_`gd_gd_LLMMMsOtOOOOOPPQ@RT*W,WWWYZ[[gdbK[ 7$8$H$`gd_gd_{gdN&_`gdN&_gd_{gd_`gd_sOtOOOOOOPPPPPQQ@RRRRSTTUVV1V4V>VcVVVV*W,WWWWWWXYYYdzݥݥݥݥ݇zzh:xh_CJ^JaJh_h_hp3OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ]^Jh_h_6OJQJ^Jh:xh_CJ^JaJ h_h_h_h__H hN&_h_CJ^JaJh_h_OJQJ^Jh_h_^Jh:xh_CJ(^JaJ)Y$ZZZZZZ[[[[[[[[\\]]^^^__```aaabbccddndodddeenfffGgHgNgOggg hhhiiijjkkllmm?nnnCoµˮ h_h_h_h_B*^Jphh_h_^JhN&_h_CJ^JaJh_vOJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^J h_h_OJPJQJ^J_H D[[[[^`addndodnfGgHgNgOg hi?npKsFtGtHtItgd_gd_{gd_gdbK[`gd_gd_{gdN&_CoDooopppqqrrKsssDtEtFtGtHtItStTtttuuuvvwww.w/wwwwwxxyyyzzz#{${{{{κ頠頊 h_h_h_h__H h_hAOJQJ^J hZvh_CJOJQJ^JaJh_h_^J&hZvh_5CJOJQJ\^JaJ hZvh_CJOJQJ^JaJhN&_OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^Jh:xOJQJ^J2ItStTtuwww.w/wyz#{${{{C|||k}l}~`gdN&_ 7$8$H$gd_gdbK[gd_gd_`gd_|gd_{{{{C|||||||[}j}k}l}}}~~~ *·úުޠޑh_h_CJOJQJ^Jh2OJQJ^Jh_h_^J h_h_h_h__H  hZvh_CJOJQJ^JaJh:xOJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^J(hZvh_CJOJPJQJ^J_H aJ9*·f В֓דؓ{gd_gd_gd_gd2`gd_f В֓דؓ cdҙźh_h__H h:xh_CJ OJQJ^Jh_h_6OJQJ]^Jh_h_^J_H  hZvh_CJOJQJ^JaJh_h_^J&hZvh_5CJOJQJ\^JaJh_h_OJQJ^J6 cdDѝ̠|}|1BC6{gdN&_{gd_gd_gdbK[`gd_ҙDѝ̠ |}|1BC6.AnoԻ԰԰hZvh_^JaJh_h_^Jh_h_6OJQJ]^Jh_h_OJQJ^Jh:xh_CJOJQJ^Jh_h__H  h_h_DnoԱ Agefgd_gd_`gd_{gdN&_{gd_Ա+-L_ Ag@Sef9Iv鷷 h_h_OJQJ^JnHtHh_h_^JhZvh_^JaJh_h_6OJQJ]^Jh_h_H*OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^Jh~9OJQJ^JA9Iv M>?@ATUY|gd_v`vgd_gd_{gd_`gd_ f!]^gd_ M>?@ATUYZ[lmx<NP󿫫ڿڿڿh~9OJQJ^J&h/Oh_5CJOJQJ\^JaJ h/Oh_CJOJQJ^JaJh);OJQJ^Jh_h_^Jh_h_6OJQJ]^Jh_h_OJQJ^J>YZ[lmx<NSyr{ gd_`gd_gd_gd_PQhiSyr{ 鴴h~9h_CJOJQJ^Jh_h_^Jh~9h_CJ OJQJ^Jh_h_6OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ]^JhLlOJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^JhAOJQJ^J= #$c #$`b)*[\{gd_gd_gd_gd_`gd_#$c5Ur #$`b)*[\f567ABhiPBh_CJOJQJ^Jh_h_6OJQJ]^Jh_h_^Jh_h_OJQJ^JPf567AB      gd_ 7$8$H$gd_gdbK[gd_`gd_{gd_gd_hi                ?8λ󱧞h9$h_CJ OJQJ^Jh9$h_CJ ^Jh_h_^Jh9$OJQJ^JhN&_OJQJ^J$hK2.h_CJOJPJQJ^J_H  h_h_ hU _H h_h__H hK2.h_CJOJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^J4?8efgqrky;O 7$8$H$gd_gdbK[gd_gd_`gd_efgqrtuky;O}     !!!!!!!!󱨨󨨨h9$ h9$_H  h_h_h_h__H  h);h_CJOJQJ^JaJhK2.OJQJ^Jh_h_^Jh9$h_CJOJQJ^Jh9$h_CJ OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^J;}   !!t#*%6&7&8&9&D&E&Z'(((, , , ,`gdkQ|gdgdkQ|gd9$gd_|gd_gd_gdbK[ 7$8$H$gd_`gd_!!""t###$$*%,%-%%%6&7&8&9&D&E&&&Z'''(((((((())**a+Ͻ󶶶ylllllllhYD'hYD'OJQJ^JhYD'hYD'5OJQJ^JhkQ5OJQJ^JhkQhYD'CJ^JaJh9$CJ^JaJh_hkQB*PJph,Sv h_h_#h_h_OJQJ\^JnHtHh_h_^J h_h_OJQJ^JnHtHh);OJQJ^Jh_h_OJQJ^J%a+y+{++++++++++++, , , , ,,_,o,p,q,,,,,,,,,6-7-H-----ūzzaz0hh5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph3hh6B*CJOJPJQJ]^JaJph-hhB*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph3hh5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJphhOJQJaJhhhYD'hu'OJQJ^JhYD'hYD'OJQJ^JhYD'hYD'6OJQJ^J& ,p,q,,,6-7---....T/U///011x1y111223 3l3m31$gd----..(......T/U/a///////000000011101x1y1111111122222жжТЎtttжжtж3hh6B*CJOJPJQJ]^JaJph'hB*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph'h\B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph3hh5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJph-hhB*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph0hh5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph-223 33l3m33333_4`4444444444賚mZPC;77;7h^jh^Uhu'hOJQJaJhOJQJaJ$hhCJOJPJQJ^JaJ'hh5CJOJPJQJ^JaJ0hhB*CJOJPJQJ]^JaJph0hh6B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph6hh56B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJph0hh5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph-hhB*CJOJPJQJ^JaJphm3_4`4444444444444K5L555555$a$gdr$a$r$a$gdO$a$gd$m5$ !!a$gdX #`gdkQ1$gd444444444/585J5K5L5555555555555555555566 6 666ԴԴjjjjjjj)h+phIkB*CJOJQJ^JaJph#hIkB*CJOJQJ^JaJphjhIkUmHnHuhmHnHujhIkUhIkh$m5hIkB*CJphlll%h@3hIkB*CJOJQJ^Jph%h$m5hIkB*CJOJQJ^JphhX #hIkB*aJphjh^Uh^&6666[6\6666666666666666666677 777717c7d7e7̷̷򫜇uuggXghIkCJOJQJmHnHujhIkCJOJQJU"hIkB*CJaJmHnHphu(hE1hIkB*CJaJmHnHphuhE1hIkB*CJaJphhIkB*CJaJph(hIk0J56>*B*CJOJQJph1jhIk0J56>*B*CJOJQJUphhIk56CJOJQJhIkhIkCJOJQJ"5666666666617c7d7e777$a$gdt s$xa$gd !! !! $ !!a$gdX # s$ a$gd[B+$ !!$d%d&d'dNOPQa$r$a$gde7f7g7~777777777777777777788Ӽzvoe[[[T[GhIk5CJOJQJ^J hIk5CJhhIk5CJhhIk5CJ( hIk5CJ(hIkhthIkB*CJphlllhIkB*CJOJQJ^Jph%hRhIkB*CJOJQJ^Jph#hthIkOJQJ^JmHnHu,jhthIkOJQJU^JmHnHuhOJQJ^JmHnHu!jhthIkOJQJU^JhthIkOJQJ^J77788888=8888888888$a$gdQ$a$gd$a$gd  !` !gd!>$a$gd@3 s$xa$gd $ !!a$ $xa$gd%Sp $ !xa$gd!-$ !xa$gd%Sp88888 8!88898:8;8=8Z8_8888888888888;nnnndd`NN#h4'h 5B*CJh\aJhph,Svh^hIkCJOJQJ#hIkB*CJOJQJ^JaJph)h+phIkB*CJOJQJ^JaJph#hkQhIkOJQJ^JmHnHu,jhkQhIkOJQJU^JmHnHuhOJQJ^JmHnHu!jhkQhIkOJQJU^JhkQhIkOJQJ^JhIkhhIk5CJOJQJ^J888888888˾hu'hOJQJaJh^h_hIkCJ8aJ8hAhIkB*CJ<aJ<phhIk#hYD'hIk5B*CJH\aJHph,Sv888888`gdkQ$a$gd; 0 001F:pmR/ =!"#$%p E 000P1F:p/ =!"#$%Z Dp8 001F:p/ =!"#$%Z > 00P:pX #/ =!"#T$%p DpA 0 00P:p/ =!"#T$%p DpE 0 00P:p/ =!"#T$%p P DpF/ Ͳ9MJFIFExifMM*>F(iNH c8Photoshop 3.08BIM8BIM%ُ B~ cH" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyzCCu ?(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((E{(u?Z[\Kx.5,]#vjݒb?~_q{O=;5J->!Y$$z14<-_p{X14WB9B9?V+w=h__S_WB9B9}Z9s(CσseǨCσseǨOpsQ^? Q Qj]`>͗>͗?λEx4//|/=G4//|/=Gժ+w=h__S_WB9B9}Z9s(CσseǨCσseǨOpsQ^? Q Qj]`>͗o/ΣwwRֶڭ#*",҇u:((o~3xCŀVeYٌo&b=?TbQZ(Vhwi]bQ6b'WarޭіoΒzF[տ:J( rޭіoΒ\~te[󤢀-ߝoV(.zF[տ:J( rޭіoΒ\~te[󤢀-ߝoV(.zF[տ:J( rޭіoΒ\~te[󤢀-ߝoV(.zF[տ:J( rޭіoΒ\~uk . %_AXFZ;i#A*)4g$LQg㦋Lξ_#ĺ"/"=b]Z#_Q5ZP|ec4FKoh9ъ"*2W?WM.rZ@*" "Dh>?>)3Z4.;i:%z!< \?ao?:r׎n3O6Uo2G<80P3ո@m籯(zW~ÿUW'㭫H-}f4գ.v ~؏p+4OO}gH.-."9aCUq[qVkG?˜koxi_#B(>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@w4iA(~3Ci;yL٧bP=Skf`:W~'{,t:{_~fO>?_[ wZD"G =H+ ~#t +VˮxFn+E c)kfDdc_r {B a-7Y;jZ--(^oN|s OSki+5{69A,њͯNWN5) :ظ=FW^C׈|acԼ163}VD܌;#y9ZJw2 1O_G(T~Þ3ˬV_x۴f;I2\g;x |sFk:̼4w,d7-;>%NUҼAj/HF@l;O*govP:=/;U&tE2~W?*~ ~_7tEsju3mgډi:rWxjuo]5nWWoٳw>FP C0T/bx..z 'C'~x"f9qaavrzsg.MRCk4cj'QE~V}QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@-.. he^$CX{hA?2k5K#{t&XЊ2f6[mKƟ.q_M<9dAH RvW=oZw=G~IQ~+U_B[⮇la>#驮EK Q_E?~{7%m|]`57ojZb1[]IJJ0xZvgɅQH(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}ITx'œ?QN( m/cwx <k*cR5u%gQzŦGc?|#Li0Đ]Y^EלI#NA2gSXk#RI=[=9=ns_?!h:Ǜvn;[ۨf[2ǒyh1_rm5ֺ#,A4yɓ+,gWUuZ~h=Q`)I ss\~_d}&t-'a/98Z?!? th'1b;RspNHmT,z,ֿt rϫc~ }7zG(=ࢊ(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@o:?l9LWG6MZB΢X}N_OkdUI{MRċL|#'\?AƚG Nڞ[j|2\ZHG F}Gpס~ѿ'[>} VXC,koQ_Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@em7/> xX u sjnD?rnz4+? ]M)~> \}PkG8OSqЬ2rf{WqvUZij^O1ޒ_'fO_q SPӾ>h0o>F[EFԶq"B'w;k|nVLbւKGR;هsIo7{ᮽ1y_0 o"hr(mq}iW,F^Sï?#Nl+Hh'fhdxVR8 5j$?_-[.5uf̅lQ~)vlрOVV~xF{5xէ٫Q\EPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@aʒEOڧWg2x_%g 32͓̯6) M?ǺaN:mGI S0k-dӼKmY"o- TVyʋ;z?'QEEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@>|b?gώ>~}zXH- ,G#܇>>񏆾&xIe['^[ [[ȖXQAx5RIk\ɬ|59>yk"X˼NʹSkg~iVOz'il%H :g>m+R&{`qѐ~G׈fmn`ԿvIYHnVOUْ]{j4 xSWeَpU +N7sx;N% ͈Ş._  ®K}M_4ї/Rt=1K_Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~ig/۷C5yZ'7Rpqp%9 I7~<3S4]JYex.#3U e'S=C* w? V| ?i?uhW6ҿHnﵛ<x'~ KMKIOWC} _6g௎oOh\u(G{?lS 3]+F`#&-U/x* ?hNj0B*{^g[<KQMCa%w'Pliᯊ-뒶%_h;4v:kQcJ'~M-#lo0ШEWzEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@MMliswEug{GVH i55_5N28ܲXYw0ٓ~7>wu]NH$y\BpFDB:q_9o N:n[j}}mYbq_uًh>su2oi#}Mfo,bW}E9Q\E,$9b5Ա3NĺUja'5*(#>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@qB_"W2ߴw}j:2H$Z5VAگ q}'_򴟈oFk@,Fh|We_Y(a/}WƜ4tG2<W~іvټ+9O@c$ /UOҼ-\t_Viy+ l$#>zH{f)a%_K}cûWs=B:wpѵ}kZ%^wm*$6zuJsz=b_ T6z?~g Z74ڛa_}$mDk&EN<_MըʜNkTGpT ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@v ~ xG= ehuOjֺ̈́Hr;>ELZїN~/xk |ht&mWwyfxx#̤WuA퍶i 3Mc"YPد+ go~kCQm#Ufr9aY@[_q g?h ~-QmIP|FDŏu8 ~_,gd~b/TYW LwJv_xe#xrϧ}3EiQ_)nG4t/b(>((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Hueۧ*n<C>!F-56X\ |jWώIwM6w-LEђs@W]#n]Heu8*A c~_G~*%ƅw0LOJf?~AnZ*8{wO|3ԡW>G>~+|7 OOÚދ}[Y2GlnS{b1^WF|9rzKFIzgQ~z &M@51VTX9)n5'RyzO=-R 4i#=H vN+~ ̲⡼W7ݤQ'e{=?X(\((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@O_m;7>*Onqg;#'n`Q:f[l;w"c_-{[?h|v׭u BGhe'$K:W9b`ZzW{9<6{螾GgQokQ=cu8$ixX.zW 7~F~*x.v|=Zk:|pVkYU5|3V>$+]᾵v⹲He7 _?l|7M>W{ UM= S_y\N_~Fꢊ+(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@׵ k>)m^AX' $=AhCe#:CX_ !=?#6]S1f&/9KD\ǠμIʽ b"mo{,\zM~+ 2?~:4q <ƸAw!7Gu/~/A$p@Ey/L ${2fI>6~ⶃn K1nc'ǝob|@eֹoxqUqnyI IQ޿vڿa5_On3q\?Z{G0ԜpMwq8̾6ٳ=o߆j]>kRQE~8~QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@nn7 7[տg}r~S/#Hj;aJrxW_Fr?ك𶫬 } l ^GEy Er1$._-YWKX>O{cA4 wADѩ.tP-T 3Zh߲_ௌqjkWZ ??SSňa}H2#i"9GQIE#T_"ekῌ {mSA.}F FKIZ)e5< 'SW|_Е M4s \[:I$D!ApA K_G?|_}Zs6d>׋]UV $٢bOVݎ+.(%Bx׍XFvjEW)QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@I[ʗȜ2:"? L~߱ς1.6_Q[-"7J]k??foT_ƽŤG"1Xmr?e>}ICJ?dzr"`_xy6`HRvǖ޵a]wRJaĿ|eaeG6Lv"d H+*3L ?~V>׷ȼImJwnf_SW$dӫC􀢊(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~iR?_ 'O>df"1L{!R:4 \G4fy-u-"S7hT{AEWzAEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@طxS׮w]rxAF%~DWHpM_-2/voj !+I SHG ǁTmWRwK,=yo|U{;\Ə|e5 wZD!$SdMpApEq?Al|ksuwm[͙/ż\޻|CFXzGO KJYב[EWQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@FF2G5#iU~>n?hV~!'-V5h Rs9j?_ڀ?ُ^ۧxOʚ JOJ|fG?~?ƺw>*e(yM_;il|4gh,Ӊ9Orp UV?ٗtޑi W2mҁƘ,@ʟtgswmA.#we8<Ӟx澂ƪҔ'(Ijg萚R[0+2(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@z#"5 v͸xwYr0QQRg+4VPgfU^:ş7 JZO4mVAW!">)~۞6kg H~ aNq/>Qn;'ſVrj53ijF8Drу|CH <+Wh6|1yּ2N~oA+[sҿ <7WOQAkno_/У6w졯%:R6O/c?v+@1=PUkMO]dG?f1i?#E?)5!yهqJIcYb`2B72cZTgw }A >]?>(>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Difvڥȷpg{@׬ Oe3dkh~&U6&tvnw[L9:t_iyy]Ũi47J Fw+;?hoڿD?fԴX#rjq } _xJj8z=?'F zU3ռiw0|∞Ru*4w4R^N+ ?? ~|R-:7č9uF5X3г;Oq^~|u=Cۺ|T^OF\_pkUyq7>/6~*x>_;Jk9 &%Ue݆#w*?9TsvBFmR/5QԈf&{)A_Ѝ~kR/g*aUuAEWuQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@=@!6_!hvf̍`̩VW2?^ ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@oo/~8"Fgt-NWӧE2?KG_:h+|1'ud aϬRnCZ52'k_=߃o\z=!7=_k&+Zo_G߉_ 'ת_Yل̟g :- ځo؛tАTWw}&'3S/_g|V^i^"ѬAEuem,9Ȍ8*Au_4~QE ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~)ieۋ?M] 9l3ySrp6g~tі*G!P}EscpFtg_yـKZZg|Xm៌ A1 iZ= h.A;`j/ CK⿉>x2k+G.ak ?ߴ՟"_}Xs҂#ZXDkfx~zk4k1nǒM~+1հzMJ%<]=R?~'_ k7^~DrZSg?7AO'E>kV& ~Em5\ya_|VM%p7`h_,QE|Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@kL6x][OihQ|Rƣًuy_X_ٙ?iKźZZ /-IS2S#⿁?f8|xO 1~MK 6'Kt9Oß2摯iFmo"Yc$Fĸ ,cKKYj߉cOQ|ߍ|w^-uiSѵ }WO_ŬXew_4|m?h^o}T1)!T|9b2okl H<6=U;JO-Bg Gm6(Kc_ s{~c'mkCcq8 4~ƍ{[ˬ6¿Vn5gغp{k/mO;~Z/5yz'(A8EJspdYKe^}}[ޓ_o36_:3hw-/H3YHv9ĈI<Tw L(~ s?\"3T" YDLRa_Y|i_5_hW6a lΨā 1OY/)^Pgӯx-*ꮤWpF*8L]ynR*u#+(t 2AWKMb\kz5xS N_XXߒKKRORM~IʅYўm}ЭHŠ(cP((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@hiZ+Y\yia0༟ mhPyZ'kOJ-5Vzd%~ܗZWd~=|g\#2m { 0%ĝ>^ەi L;TZv_y:2c]|I_Oǟ7Oٗ^)cm%xFa>6ń%<`",x"c9:M?靵Q_ZQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@`~}]trV:v-4{ BÎ 9_<7֣Hl-/"(^7# 5Qdc׊C"4?i??ӉuB, 9ZG'[4|u&?+n4{_ Mj'~'Vf?3?59eo+ y֌|Y27_wK f9}[Ϊm W`YDũDў9?f_|HwWrxͼ-#me$ яQN6ݾ ZW\ 큱 @I\?ڙ2WSn[?vh$L$((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@A_n: k-G6p"Ҿ#+A#aYo׼яV*s_ϭw? >"xĝ⧄%0-5>U$b{9VUn3:ˣ/ǧzdXp1ZjٍxTATv6;GGby-'Ixxf+FVq_[7߆=o$|KZ;h@c}ѰT?+e۫-;9G4 ?jl4i\р:_yp\ Mh~U(SCs?i/LW(}TYR6̌;Ys__WQ~ dMzbc?4p-@ 2` zx-2}NSzQExQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@M/f~ZߥYUM\Ivgm!}-@jm'UdM7">; _ O7txGĺ-w6RoyR}~7(o&7}Fmb"Ueb}3{~_1+0}ޱ~_qm~ʟ_>:5UCLGGǡ_鯥jv֗mirpGum"^EkM?dZ| fU?vBJu\$zΚ y`\L›sh4*;b1YɎH|WդIZoِ~ucƚ>=X\Ij:\7Ѿ"NVS;]cO6i*eF}ڋ2er/"ykg/VJ+ſgO~xO㇅>T?C(x55Jr$Gi4QE@Š((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@{Zh|vЙĞm#fݲHЎx jQ SjmBN5 ݡ=Lhu \"f⹳:C$wn?en:~z#>~}. CbpM/?؆᮳rf־޷.Uس:lϧI嗄zyX+O9WfZ/k] i)_]̹ty?QxZRZGuZ~bR_/6]?uQ_}QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@AZ?Nnã|E 'b{ZeAlj__QmwC=1`On#BOk|9c>!_g{mCKQCA$l1 Ef|xJC8ުwp#'*89.?U?#3W WSnjZs=ĖP*O u#*F%W4?ju)mkO͖~wMIp+̯>~z׉q4̭0\HWOq_e~˚K,nx<-,IW޻qTqt֪}c军OfP8WEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@_m_>c$k>8wcsɳe5ynz @?&)?gSFVE# =縫*ת}' TӨޏGG?_8dۉuڒ,ʹA|$&b󀱓+~2xy_l_xc\^q"B͉䬑F"žğ^Gyd}`Ymn1 rֿ'~|[/Ġ kZVC˟"/WcWSS[~O?T+V*[^G{ƺďh+2ik{{h#XW[_o0>1~|.<_ᶤt~vүIԅa,C 1_UkxlMJ/m*ԡUuAEWuQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+e'ٿdwxbwgO\cr~WH/?rCs_Csqh5gxVQQh$u??n:}EA}zssm?>,I!$u?N>S#Gş7?O?vd;_iGתw0& sACk:(N$u??n:}E^?~#d;G2MS;ۘ?|Y sAChI!}zp[sG?n:7?O?vӢTna?g2MS&tQm?>,I!$u?N>S#Gş7?O?vd;_iGתw0& sACk:(N$u??n:}E^?~#d;G2MS;ۘ?|Y sAChI!}zp[sG?n:7?O?vӢTna?g2MS&tQm?>,I!$u?N>S#Gş7?O?vd;_iGתw0& sACk:(N$u??n:}E^?~#d;G2MS;ۘ?|Y sAChI!}zp[sG?n:7?O?vӢTna?g2MS&tQm?>,I!$u?N>S#Gş7?O?vd;_iGתw0& sACk:(N$u??n:}E^?~#d;G2MS;ۘ?|Y sAChI!}zp[sG?n:7?O?vӢTna?g2MS&tQm?>,I!"䍧]Ls?vӢTna?}0~,jc/.xnxWW M8e,sLē=?f_ +i/ ud..mݽe=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿnchu_Q}&~}{E}_/~o_AFk~~C";A/?ƏYh5}Qo۬_>e=l_AG?#ɿncjxU+U9}}Tc6i3\Q }m.x岽~Hz(S((((((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (;O;xE)}jv T!*s5x:?Oi<-[V9ǭA7|G˺-ћm:Xpy}>_Q_ǹw=b"3~[-Ҫ$@P?nOKkmRãOꙛCa5O#mٻW捇HV.}_|ȟ0 ~{zONߺia) ֿGSnkaGyu6,3}S[?V\b*S[=W QU.bfxheCtpXB"WʟQE((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+![y3_W?Bf.!^/GEEPEPEP(((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ~z$V0|78EL 쓪diKghHCGR >EscpJtgW#ͪ`1q$m[5 xPCҤgT>TM) :Wx"ignj-UеKRaH)>4uwzrj{e԰a_w!2-3hvV#LcXa'kʆ*xqPwM'>_ M:z4n7>ԋ%2 K+%'wXijY܏3*{=Zuoe[=WK~EWrQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}[D+7kGVo ׅ?^>hz(0((((((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?zZU'Lv\ &x&"G@c޾ F~š޳[_2<} I@濟/㏆+سmu8ͳw1fn4OsktV G=|utoʿ)rf4zsŘd˪ʓew|VZO|/3Aڍc2E?UĽS+YkUvy !}}9'5G[H@L>uqBt`Gj{ֹY/v3P$WO0z[ M=VL o~QEǀQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEo![y3^ze袊`((((((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( d,hZfχn]PzQ_HώiWڤ=7ƶ١<|w_c6|ռ?& Me4p\x'`#:(psu$y{ ?ឿk P0i#' M@ď$ۚ?oپ|kB5{KG}B-Vyn̨`fnotl/๶1VX~b|j`%~s~A~т@lMi",_ߗCxö+%vp̸pDn3H,7-eQ}fԻtQE|Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}[D+7kGVo ׅ?^>hz(0((((((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (>>8?ӞVur4]g6?5F'~*|=%Kw_@`42q_c8#_ُ~>~˾MMOO Y$beGO5`tpG"UI/?S?|/B5=U$SdMpAq_+/ýZ}o[H!.t͎y@+8c'i.}8i:8U 6篔ޕ31]iB|7z˝O޾U?-u[gRgO(Š(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((-"wC5u}[D+7k/_џu4zQ_~QEQEQE(((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 1|r| ůc*L;6 ܘǽ~,ע|$|QIZgXyv7!5Ti>y}"%7?+gߵ73i6>W/,Z4h<؀KkNGm*FxBUX:0#CkW|-MǞU\7+suPA ȯ~M%~^3Wc EM~uѴHPxϒ'P|9}5_?o0Q~?o{E?S+IK|G}ّ=++|{[?v7-%DW?]^Fi:90{ҧzb͠+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( GVo o F}ׇ QE|a0QEQEQE(((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?$9MUMaXYF=Wo0/>Sn7wξ2[Nm72 _nona}7/9}' cؚj+=OM;:9Xܕm0uI[GN'_7YƄO-b}8㜿3?Vz׃ȹrz;9XeE)P]eYOpA5x>2?D-oڅΕ@S_gw4O_EP.~Ơ[H}ܧ?V︓ W3vcf(xg⥳)RS&;urЉ >WQWg^aa] c_9wªk=C/깬S~uoz7kh4~KKܟflaѾ#dR#]R @zv ;⹏"gǁ;˶~ecXqDeORv~~kV\wt+1iMV @O7>xGZCDԭK9-8 wcb'}߻gV_3-?t_t? t`lu*UlHlJ75-;3F(B ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( GVo o F}ׇ QE|a0QEQEQE(((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( X??зIq7+~ذ 0QYV9՟cjaQvNuw <!qkwV5d_ W\iUI|?o` |βg$x 7짣jcCsnr  *kSNZ"Ԣh׏@ 0=+> KTm&gPhҗɭWK=6! fywlugb?p:#?]k[Ԯ F)ֵ{7~؎q¾>:KikgxvQ^)QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEo![y3^ze袊`((((((+k s$9!ZZCHnkQOc+ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?Z?Nmw썼J 2#$zWOk|mfVԮt* ]SO".N's_߃YŚg;#C_ȽV[w>t  \ҭ( 9(S+5K~GπYqYu|-WWucrLQՁWD8 *çc_/'?hk%!9q Ž8=~Gd|Scۘt??&Z 01!(OZUh;7Oua7cwf6]"xE_y8P~fot:R/鶊(>h(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+![y3_W?Bf.!^/GEEPEPEP(((+k s$9!Z(~|Yd9mc%c 8+ w~'RL+huS?w_ 'Q %~O߾?g7|KgQ^ %~OKO4Gէ?_s=i/?u_  >?aWI|)(S?w_ 'Qi+%3(S?w_ 'Q %~OVx/Ex?4Ÿi?i/?uVω}+᤾II|)(7|KgQ^ %~OKO4Gէ?_s=i/?u_  >?aWI|)(S?w_ 'Qi+%3(S?w_ 'Q %~OVx/Ex?4Ÿi?i/?uVω}+᤾II|)(7|KgQ^ %~OKO4Gէ?_s=i/?u_  >?aWI|)(S?w_ 'Qi+%3(S?w_ 'Q %~OVx/Ex?4Ÿi?i/?uVω}+᤾II|)(7|KgQ^ %~OKO4Gէ?_s=i/?u_  >?aWI|)(S?w_ 'Qi+%3(S?w_ 'Q %~OVx/Ex?4Ÿi?i/?uVω}+᤾II|)(7|KgQ^ %~OKO4Gէ?_s=i/?u_  >?aWI|)(S?w_ 'Qi+%3+V0|p_ 5ڴ<1x5 5Y &?_  c }|+!Wc\Ԯ`u{G5v 1omo.BI Ҽ&ɧԂUc 2Zt/rZ=;?1J#DvT |ȿ3Xe,z 3ީ'W~.X48`Vi#,_wᏆ4._Di"{e h= GJ/ߋ |C[⯈x j^֯4KF7Ii+G = UO ???IXZ B62X6pNvH.IfV+#_d5s?K(Y>02wFp埸R?^V6:gFsI/z5Ѥ+S _CkB_x`c_s"Эb*wp'\35g-ZxG?";NTz??Q_hQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@5o׿fߏMφ5mMhB}k> |JN_ JFAXYo"!#aWJWs~gc \2 Hs}*t/rva'\)"{}?S4S'^?(s&796 UO򶕨Zm=,!kki|'?/ dg_r'#wٮ睩(LF=9Gc}_ pe|DOnMe#`}ԘIOC*<i;;GS3E[juC0v#y=5 7y[&u R+ SWaEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~ ?j:G5z8?n`|$ 7|WehƧ^$o{asgk<$ԎYAs< q8zy%o'eXaq4.kC>?kOE6x6#wvsI _2byǗ:#sEt _ºA_דi X"'GuZwenCVR弭B/LKP;f d+`*Ux)GRF_fOct.u vMpQm#hԆ n6 ?j=_{׮zg-3}Qu-^X*I\[WR)i-W't{7a7EgQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@/QN=_#+ W~B7y3#\ @:{ /Oآnne>^Cn2͈ul&?kkI+ b;=t/7~9qPzҳZ!6EkdqŝF9pz;K/ͩ㩭%i%_b;,oX.W |Qſc5Yv,?{i*F۴P/?3?>/6UL&kZ0 [Øģ_uS| ֿf_'57z0I ǟhNY75s,ٓZ???MG`Y}UT q >?ƾ2Ko8KW}5UQ_Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@FF޿O/1^]NMx9GfBr \KlѐOV Wө>k"-+.HQu03٘xs?jfN߷.9$8-F2rD#ҿ2?3=cU4/~!Ԙ% ϔ۸M?fb|*Fsk jng ҅hx$#R=͝ 4NH%^9G!|W;,ټ_C8a]~k?*k KYƾ <&.Oo=aH9kNTJRN;=B( ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@w >#xWSzͦa 5*}p4T IKFiJ,xc ed6MW .# ѱ;2_tn_K6'-S&I#OhD|Bٳ\v-Ob;|ͤj*nDIO:>w| ;Xh.tQ7*O0r+rdXs onoI~qaNˢV?.m ov{hgyrLzW|~هg}75{˴BAś˼DG|uxg?|=a̗:~ecqKorXHVu_reUⴚVL;ްnE'Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Gx~_VмM?!fR_3Gs_'~<?l>hV4jtcMgNQ d,")sԱJ 2n?&-xb`kiGM*A^ Tk_ەF[7oo(SK_Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Qmg:t/xKqn-R^Y4ޒ-ƿP~>M.m>߀_%xñ{+^ħ?}?[G]L]Jg(BuP+;Š(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@7_ífͭ9o ܫdk 3>!?D?1_߳8MOi@[|#ry6>:a2deWKO-5˓12>Z {-*Afk|eO 4{sCtG[{'q\F>_0e$܇?+? L%~> <\z<@/QGH+*ax]CʲAA+M/Pu+XKKt `E<#bOxrx},ᑻ-?y-i__87L%e^1Z6O7=*Xi=*-=W We5.Cx 0K .UI'Mßc[5ːgtyD灬iJ(\2Z.~8/e??cEŢ[5>smAHBbǵ~(o|^tOZͦf㜽H< ALK3|Ir>1_Q̕Uw=SR(?Qß~ⷄe#Ѭ7o"YT?C` Jpqn/t~j(Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}n?dKŦj&-jd[,<@{W`|^NiΜ*T+B7O?կ^Ŀj~ iwkeƛy ]c|G*ƿ-㯋>xx_\Y,Q9f\Yb*}W|_|#^\kC_,Gn4#slbr1&?م</Y\t5M5s jBS=M~'u**#1X*x^O~-[SuˀH(ݾv5Gy+܈++E7Oٓs} 3\g`jf bf$^WJii?{Sq  EWǟ@QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@чMKfn&,鱹F+HIe2(+VIV>3{cͬxp]GKʫ4^d??a_s⟉Xb<3ZkVl;ʐx!*AwψA)V}/z=b ȖU#W!`)}}5orj`}3\\%͹xfE6+"TZ<iO?_S(RNb<ޛ|eֿ*ҟo]/$"1afu2zze?ڿ`i'앯O(W^G|qo$̑^ᣌˡm/"naO?(?H ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@p_n6eK~֮72h7>PNHa*>c5y}Bokn4[Sk+w+$RƾW2 5t}ofU#~|+QhV#:^مtc_/}Aj3Ϗ:YbC^B}qp{WI_M$<"j<&/ZpabW#__4 듉u'tg 4"!u]s_oiM'>Sn ]vxAF:}F<,7X^E*̫m+СV_Y7Ju%|?@+ JG?}FfHmHh OL}g# +x+ɮoGSե_SQH2X=WEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~?)h¥LZ7ĝ?c խIs6&:_x7i^:k躍FZ;YX!r+0J>O&^K:Wec$:L:$7[?ٲ 69;\a| Hp"ЩW_t/;~:xm'ЭB,uxO=b^6kM~̩6#Fh~6AM!QBƆ^D`K!P:+(_x}*p54{U_c/ª{^g!N;\`>q`XCOnb9k¿7#}D69]?Z~Tg`2@uqZ4jW}WR h^y7hM~QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@/aL'xX׮w^^xCF%XnT׷߳2|X;谇~jBAv56Ԉ:"F5gyvq dI/~ʞoX7cƏ C妳l9@cțu$W|4ߊtOO]a*wCuș}>6&/&5zuwi +Ыo~Ӈ+^5O:G?9{t`WxUtߏ.:u_oy=Q_Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@А{;'?iaxPMożh|Ir;Wz컯϶:*9um1 W<:Ա=ɉ@_`Hz.>c4/W9d_C٦L$@05})Bt2ڴx'ކ(+~Gm|4ȷjzޛ..{F@&+'- i6\mt.nexӾecW]XEc#E<2,Ja^G St_G&>8uXK_~_mY!xafth,m6p?"ůq%JkS8Š(K ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@z_ pb宱`peYc܌;^AEEJq\$ҍiSjA٭WV_< RwUe' [^D%Lr+?य़#~_>Y sìig,7HzWUo<) uoڙaFG-qfNy!Έʊ;Wrg(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@DigO^r wx7U@O6X9'c]ގGj_1۲Ǟp?྿H!o|Hm:7{ncS:pح7w*fp?č91k'8Cz r.e/:2y`KfOҊh$ӫ(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Ym78OZ0o! #\b4R}d?J{ s3\kYD4iXIR˟_ki|mrMN}-Mɪ} Q=~C+=wKGE<';}y+-i(۞ \}N d1=!J'yิU'1Ȍ :0#*FjNC}F֑i_REܜe.{gfq_pn7I_+((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@ï___궺Ο:uY%YS \Ќ1h? |mOxB"E90E7܇MEi?m6:>\Ep!ag~/o7xQƵmĠJ8bl Cj2,'t+ro*f{Q\o{_V|eY$sFx9åL5QH(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~&i+ tmt=jO؏ZXXg灷=rYу/U#.7 gB{I5~2Xz OK>xYhZ= .c)r{0t_~)x'S5^hf[IZ"̀%/?itb?MFkxKSK 䴪oq 5ş*1A߈:g4jWҕ"wĞIŸ,.6[55(ptH|zi\vˬ|7Y.=MU;%~ 6z\?!ķn B ; +lI-'wG~EQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@ӇcL//xW׮YmS`kgE )kcp(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@3wo>bM\ur+]`=v2ah?ui~֮<Vy-!>zY')8ʾԲ/ϱl')~̒jgiۂTH3kHjJ%'Gzoa"T|GG֢]]c.uG~_?>jkoW2ɌC~ZK\Hr:/m}]a{o E=FA\dqX*unOxb]~kG麍[\=)so^7jDii<7O'0#sϑrV =A  { /زoz6߉eKu=dܚ/ʳaޑ?jUYSkGo;྿r!>$iN;aX5Ǭez{5~9Ѿ#xNfSuK]cON i*ʇ\Q_;i;<$'mXN*I 'C(xM?rJEi%g~F*-;z?'QE!EPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@f>i+??Ə9x5JGsqT~%!>ºqi:>y9#^7#>8C#6!kR< ka24Qo)q-Drza_{{_~g\O?iZ@xfνuG+kxܛy";sY?m9 ۯ| oFWliZ25tz`: K/ڧ@+m[#~d_jzﴑ%zWSg]Vx[!`|u%1=5ٌr~uZw_3f\n'ݧm˻A u~~QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Bn7ڧVLHQu,4Hr@_Mw ~#|X? 6ݓi*66bkβՋUÿE<&.!tzl:~Gb 9j`3 (Dt&͸9V܎ٕ |ύ 9.L.gYCKM7!%v`E/e?okŞjdA,\p6)**=qJ1n3WX~G<RO7[shix$18ɓ+:?6g]_QQA41$B; +x-:4zG[|qXBg꿫Q_>zEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@OO7ğٓ[u놓R#厍5U }tb߳<oA} e7ePRx>Gue۷Z֧q~){{mA2lCr"|Gz><"ς(-Sa}Gwyf2(7 jO,Σ'% Va c g/_<6.1Zjaǟ YA _oh_<-ƙ閺p+%K4L5Y</_uφ^.בEW!EPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Y[fhFVSAn|UULW9e4{R\v1__ԯ25k6#|D7x|;DOc_.U+Zn'ì}kUw52/J .M_MUs$FIZvW1^FpM #u>^g Va<=GN/}fwM׆5w?6N9bOMe|takZ,'SJ@'N< fkѕ9ʜ֩ҡ5(GfQEdPQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}%|{?fS4fkL,]$q$G|vY֣9TH=b_#\tC!oشq I ՝A#$oӡ?e]ZiZēh M2 6r!uR{k?a/F\s|YXN(K\ fe{O~ֺ xLnW.l%r:D*3o Y~kWQ_55g\ܾ.dOuKg?`a? DH^LW'Wk`6Q 9^;-;Y[U8iWݰ"vq(=1l/;u->D$ 9WAYOpAWo{h*+)nG4t/n(>((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@?@w_mZt_6JFt&k(g{?ګRY.5_|/SN }Od+/]o~&ӼeᩚQo; Ŭ,M2OKޅO~_+Ěϑye?ut3޿#*9-/[~G9.ޏ?S/}BGբh.g VX "ON?' xn-f\k σ5} ,T}G~{S9 1vk֕o~=|c=cV] z^g7m}+]򴏈a,cYӃMjfՙG 7:%^G䵅"\p9Zξh~~+1J}Mt/+S"nYFz2+ʾI-R_^>Q'Gy'uƍ I7WTeH+u)O`ǵ|}?4O_궺Ɲ:U?U'|Ὴu'Eaٔo?Oxx{ǯܫj?xݲjG`tWֿ::RmzǯQEyg`QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@E$87)>~|@I֖qKnbԱ5? x'㗆j/ە&>UtKε!@Կi={ktgP#s5})Y- u(o*ğwCAz]G`}͇$YPI[ޏaUbo 1,p7UvH_~.7>*xBTKiHo"YT;a؂# 왨|.u3n{7l4W<&feg Ԛ=$ ?z܎ ?/e?#D:ݶd5ۈ[taxG=ekoG=GeξCG"<^-uMRuy֎FE#MIY>7$ڎ1_px*3~_JX$9 (#0'i}[6xs EWɞQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@կQOV˔3;pG B@6=k; 1IC~8 ~i1Ŀ[v2co~_<4VBڜQϓ{=0;up{WiWk:o+;ȿU6~y`3JxkIkZ5V#e'.~FlUc=__o8~ \to:i7lGg[l+dy}g/Kއ[pil|a'ߟOO3-AFgZǺOrFI_O>OC7ɝO\T]5r9uQ_5Z~/~ 4I&}ބ1je8$nDmf-.,eqGBU _98ajktߪw%DeXetpYH UGb|5sܙnv02;*R:բ=X5~W$F{Ŵ~R;5p+(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@t W<+<[j}LUe2k.d?ԯn378]Oj,1<'E(xgWwiB#Ľ⿃h5_kՄMi*ʣ6x kA |Si%ѭ52vԺdO%[^"ebb_?#^ѕ'(9>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Kt~>#jWg5 1ѧjl_&M95xomwᇊIz544LG _GbTe8 _kK_d ,,Ev˗v|Otq~y4j%??gOŸ _/CnEC5ЇPH_M?_ٯ\53Pn?7>( \ALWm1?@4+poNT cJUL-FA"9#Z ݫ#[&m>^w OiH+0~lf־/ lDڿDžu~wo!,n#%^+wD{ej̲B{[?}>oh7?g/ǽ3|Kd?hVwW˻::WjR9S;3MI)-QEAEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}u~ѷ?qh =+Y e#iw%ٔx e*y`Zr=~eF*xWJß<q:[˴"$Ѓ_E[eWup|9ZZH56aHp{濸"W6?i??Ö]s/WvK_{Z5vFsf9t_x?Сe֭ 5}dȀ =+,eWUu[}btYב_mg3.ɺ2h/=l_F?v9e'd+߶O>1]JpjKm/Qg$t>Z3|WW$SDB2:S w3raڦ>;Wp >]?KEWßJQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@O7?F>'>mFGi0Ł%=+~ Zƞ6?o&ڶH]SNHUC#)ɯm !<+A{VtWU>$ /?S/CaE;qg[L 9.Tv~>8LO Mkr#):v5Gn?o𦧩\ nO7MU[yXuĶ&ۻ_#c?KšoLtlbIB\'}~ gr}w/ð4cmYP{'7c1~o4K ۸{[ <%My'y_a:Kk ?;_{ܾMY$k F#N ף3`g]zbDI|ڡibU\gNzdq_%~]e AO-W (Ӭ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@*&*C+/PGB>PL0itbo|PO _1g]SK NT,y޿_8d_>AhV-7EHe1+|ҧ~x7x΃{j_j(ˏ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@/tf4o )Zs >BμsӊO_ xß}l\YD${:885R5jZu@m.pf'̇Z_mQE(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@ڏ 6n7:ͼ-z$?"ނf )'ڿWCo v~$f{{:);Z9IU\8=Lp:{\̌sC?_cx1ZpNwlozr3ψ |I4س&E7K/ͩi%i%Oݸ/dzt-G[x_Ě׃%.EƷ[KUH!cֿNnT+Nk?EZ5!٫Q\ơEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@zO~#1Oÿ<#!Sεi6H̶N9U((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@_G/}e۳š9C\lb-Em~߹}7y=৊~ A>wλqX#-u窊,gdvXIprFAq~<TTF9+;c# +r q{?U܏4̔UO8O¿k_ <_ [sUF=WөCSgrI|( zWč0^ȸD4].{"e$Y?Gᛍfs ֲE/%n؎b$-޽\ޚk~h.>[^'( ?O ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@SmW8tJ 5hC`!HGd_Fȿu{gǍIr"$Wu@w+Y{?G3~~߰5M.׼ 14;E"pN׶. e3񳼹QxD ;Y$BHA_c}ῈQ0jZ>$ђYDd$DZ/e$YI.uLͳO"}Aͼ:̛LZ681_d/|k.HK-ql;n ;+ >O6Ğ15^ Q/Amyɯ뮿?Lʔ^o>(c z (3 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@E?i]wxZHۥ683i1$I1/oWw1ټ[r7!~#5po2W {l ~g rCI~Ev!Ut{c߳Y'lG%ֱt|~TN ߢs“#7Vx!'슺̲u~Ɵ,> I"GK$y1ob>?"-KPti4ymD^o5*x̸7iO.+#Š(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@F4mi4w c`G(~;h>xD$lN5\ ~!m+_Us̱ľ\p=1%e^LVmxm{,TzMi_??߳,ݯeCcZQA\K8nu=z)j/­rѾ$iB(͈ƭnLFq Yq޿s/ٍ0ǐjЭ][ᾤ59W26{ 2B9R:F=uxM'{mKH."bŴ$latJc7_L*Oo4?/~?~9iCԙX2)>^_U(IJh~&(Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@}$mSäͩ.,iB-f,M!|^Niά.T+B7O?Տ|3_(.7:M.kȚ'*H#;X8Y1ZTgkP{OO+O ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@M?h~7:aWUC-8Z砯 0GV1.n'Q5 0v W| -ힵ ǘ-WxlH+B>|@ŏZ'CZkZ|s VdN@ly  ,&>>ڷVOۼ>Gt?7ʟȃ5_Imjog3Ԯޏh|+_^!>I$RN9s?TO٣Sm:5ޠ|CЫLigCpi/?ُ] xN#5m-IuL wo)}+,qj6{õ>|יEXQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@qn4d{[ΦmvHԙ`:hϠ " i)ӑ_p-/x3Xgpe6s9<ǒH³N4ʾԊZ_/>O{~6?qِ?j}ؽOuc\n@!FN5|_/SQƷi[ gu7#/FV k2h~gƖ㈥ut81J@G !?~?Zksi#E*C) zK/],D1mǾD)V}/_ҭu>e9 K*zkxi>,~ȗ5.U6>{R;`t@Vmx\MJç}QUQ^qQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@OkuscuHC*2I  PQ@ӶM'do|pjz4va;?{=fAk A?ٍ ~MsFf*khѦMR,ɞs{s |GƟ/.ɐxqlH?01Kk_o萙u+I-bSKmx916eg􄝾R}s?o<5W߯.DigöDjlhg+ r'bkEޟwO<!$iKWdGx֣V b-?qxʌ;YOq]#e<\V?hOj}{EWQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@R?V( 񧴞Vgo~# Ѐz_GwR!u?W6qk/oMZ&rn5HL5pm =g޿(?+:X-cz?X3O&lS?jY< Z=2iiMs灓8Aji 獿dv| è폙v[j(=ILɪ?r̶Z߂k] %m:.?{ ]Ր'?7_G:ٴ Yj|27慘ڻ+eM޿?2_VvXkZm̗vZFrC*GS2Gh Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@(((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@~)2_ϓHN#b1nɱ{p:_x#^!u='T5+m[Ow,as^nqG_Gg/ _e?җ 6X֟'~ I%%!@d ه>NVj&f{'gd#s_)9oձZK_=}{+h((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+B?mF9Mo#۪ g1\QE05Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@ٟgL/ ]׮xGQ Y$`H.W$30MzO47/CLT=쨣>V zqf%O:?eۃ5;ojw#g8Aꌱ[A&'ֿï _i|-lk>=Fق&rd{8sc I~3,~Tz_-x? k|Bmhz\Fvw=+?g_>SMKmUDrJΈyPGPT_KG~]/SƵw݃њB*AW~g$t!goyLm7Ư~:[/i:"9jzh :&N35n>H*Պ֞.>c[~rq'CA4;}o4߰jrF>QiJjѕ->͟%/ o+rm[FFK?S"Aasֿ+ E xzU5ۏx|*Cu$&%cc,˞+td$QGy<#;,xzf~?!,.:5_?"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"wD' .M(C!K#O$(}?H>"ڢ?a??̗t K"so rmk  bǟ a2VXэ|P8KsZ>a5!ZIuOC%(#o#",,l8`k)r fo/+8=$jMt;H{4Lp2x+*1_0{߄?k?G¾!t&r0z|ύ'M>}?}཮o ~]|~்%|Cq6?ۺ9u]5|u,}g 8xW㇅؋ kvڲ.p$'tM"k?> |F~vھ7Yc'xe"+I}W ~&#wILh(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+'~?H%[u#׍|j~ ~њ~9xkK=5X20k1&, Н(6?3?GîI<z?_O$O~' >eU7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[h?_{$w]=x;?Iϙ~U7=C~g4i?o]=x;?îI<z?$̿S*?3?GîI<z?_O$Op_?OPz[k#_O$O'O'^8_/?ʿƏ=C~g5'O'^u'GD/e_p?G?3Hu'G: D ף"N|2Gi?oOP: D ףuI' >eW~?ƿ?uI{$w2L?Qnz[i_J9gV?5_'O'^u'GD/e_etb5\,}Dq+6y{69o6 zEƾkXi1 Z [[`-m'̫6ܜy+/N?vhZ&p~>;U Hs+t;ק҆e{ZK2n5pe ??>(OB(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((L=ϭ9(1. -F1I78'v+AuiLz_雧jMŭ)qm<,9"C# AEKo+#G$l+)+ A$~Guk6V>՛2V :{b Y+|FyO?N|cu?^袊ࢊ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((EPEPEdPEPEPEPEPEQFGJ((((((((@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@!8? 31-t<g] ٞx!)=k_7O-r/I(u}<4?: ;/~? _?fmCjVT5Fcm aS_ÿo_^MT4i"ʟ+;Aݲg'_L0>m{Iӫ~aS(lw\!)U9$NCnP?>0+M3.ʕ-aT+w<n_o>"?$^#էW!U>i_D ~/7Dui+O vZN}rRo'8wn6o˜ a\n~_\SG$ҋ{% q `og:o SL4O6Yes+?/ D<7/uC^=ɢ՚aF'bsWh^ ?!,on^ ۺxWpa^-WmmS8¢P#"|_D:O xVb+Wɥg3?`?|/T- |5i+k7񷂴]5eX`Oz(ɿ7W#>`aEaokwl8u+DoCRO? ?l~>!ӼE/Nl-'۷~l21g?ro|E_/%}IwkN3ES *f@'OSVC?5?ğu/N fR],pq'c0I+Tqۧ*}}O"|_D:O xVb+_&3G(~_W?g+᮹\xP-RU+rϹH:m8]#n1\k7*lcWdRtֿ ),Ecɀ|_?!j$]apB6&{+b+-KmyI|싢~^ wuZM6[}:+{Wy7cm}/W㿎-~@< ԍOiMYInOM>38|”9j`$^#է"|_D:|^C|3#>"?$^#է?_&D ~/7Dui(>"?4Q*?4? f}'υHGO1GDui+Wɥa3G >|/E?Z?'υHGO1_?ʿM/_r?o/Q>|/E?Z>h!U>i@O xVb/WEK"g?܏r]|55_ ˡhC]P&Sq8Ѓdq_Y?u?쟯mM,Ά6K~y\^zwAEWHQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEyiju/A[,KVrmN`k*҃VJ)un:X9mKVz\Gs:[[D#qv1€7I8ap NqݛpaX4s^omtk۸QExEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEpW źf,o=ϛ"7!;QG5ǎph*z^M%~v=| 5] :Je'nnڭO(-nmc`M2SZiɔZvaEyOO >Zj5=f~dEʻUk_?|4}5X 4o98+r wUxC*Eu`qrZZf8NTV?3)FJGP{¿/ yL[x+e-l|Dw?U 7=D 6]~ɿ> |:W}CA##7>)^mK-şֽrVVZ Rj:jr;4yWg3.XZK#,62T'O?z(?K ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (?((((((((((((((k(diBPCeg!sT(diBPCeg!sT8 g|cg^~q?袊,+uǽoA 7_Q?{zĿg^_<^Bg~f?|rW& ,F'f+XJJ(U?##S?!~ OH8&T_H_S?*oaexY'ۏW~__g'O'{KS~__g'O'{K6^3}DO ),Ec?/؇_g RY+7W'0_U&=#nV'Rb9x UL_9x UL_dW{QE{GEtן %|- Z|M뗚wkkg*l̫5i?AAf9$:~? m{J~jč.A5NiСJxu6-\+e[ tQų~.|'>,g7k>G 6W!/LE$.ߑTs_~oƿM~0W (Ӗ&6S[?+Z-Iᮉ_ޗ`+?vv6)^ |anL4h\x4JfU] Mz4%F WlW3_I%PpE)Sj%VL %_ Ez?Kg_ڟ~x^Cvzg h2W5LJO'h;-zLܓ9'+_̈́?^UJ ɨ;]^7{Lau+-IEWIlO'jkf~ ?_8W_"~n]/YL(s삊((uOK?4]*X`Ѣ3<3Ef`N6Q _Ŀk6 ƧmvU i|H f92좿kJW}KOя8L Nms[b/%STqbRzʤё՝O,g?JK+K -'Q믡?_$ '꿭Hznݯ#"0>]hڡEWQEV7u'º NO0!wsPMl׌>~)| g ou} ̹™2cV=0ٮL­Jxz(ǚI6vS#ЯT)J_o_g<~|Up |+9J[I/'E80X=Ð|w&S?c__n;6ҵ&dt1#irE&hASxBּ%]xkowgv9b3VS:=AO#woxkAg-zk=7]6:IJ5ȴ3< 8&<60H8p2oHx[F+–9+s5i__~Wvqo?hJ +T6(((((֒$0AM4,O@$^a7~?n5M_.K|]I”No?o=|1 ֠>-kvK8Tf? c+Ν$Zͥ5Bߎ3_Wřf_tTZqkRxU<3bsi.^Ymwg}R?_yyiN[BKu3I@,??.I7E +)ko(i_ K]%~ӄ=?3c GOzI{g?M!?eԿxI=w⽳ !&3j_J }kIɅ%uOӺ(z?((((((((Z([f&|1_L9c1-=RQ,ed@:7igO^xc^Y#8Azq,E5GJk񂿡@?t(pbTJI+ 7S}+I$FU#OYYX~?ʿO/W= ? {GUJ(Kf~ ?_8W_ŗ3'SڿwFCpzJaEWßdQEQ_RѮNz;i8^ |C@kk}ʮCqsrÐJ_дxɥ%N|1:TZUoM>WiPuI\濛_,g?JK+Q#A%WI>mmx#_mv/&?뾥۪^uľ+ly[ ċ~Կfh#s5/,,mE |k8(x:Bn1եծׇ||I1WmrwiI이T?aOI %ZuΗgHZ[C/ Jܟ oxú$af Ab g0>'eUN._y+Y;$7 Bj*ATpy)F<8itWgƦڦń:Mi&{,v1_~-xRյd[ZiXD#e $ן*aslt(6ݺ4W}Eׂj9aSj0RѸW_D}E]K~Ϛπ<oSbmvU<ĜxϸPxmE-Kv8߉1˲\3Q);(6:߈?Po%ܓ^xKgA Nrt땻-rfu*+$^jxi~|C:*Xʌ')/WoHmo"&d J/hLvڔkZ9cUI1uY'o׫{] J3d!_qLOJ0I*-4mו;i{\(_X?ilyA r^9]<}k1xwVOi,֧ \$?:ҾcV[*񣋣RrZ|~} 8)rfɼh͹|DއCE`gĺ=g weynۣ)UGC|O_~_ e#x<4[w ܒ^|nak>ﵭXmnͳ9FYJk5mܯeY.W߶WLV[OG J9޸sMG4KF|Haz8p]?VS $g/O6F$҆^gME~AǿT}g}ݺ+xrLy(W~ÜOh}cSuO? (Qş_TB=ߌAe>7mu1_-_V{?M7lۄafܷx˛nů# 'ז_ս)T/<'ZI#`ԟPҿmJ"`oW8OC~GncWO??ടM<a'I4RUZO& $Bͩ*7%#&y&/?N袊 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (zW|OhNxo*|F?c4 PJ 1ت_z-|6w8:ySt'XM}gVA7<.#{|,u_/2n}#Z- :c[XIr@ndjTf G5? f{{m.#8xđX eA鿵/௎2Fڊ&Q|:l+|GyjS|Z?UGy΃3(2>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((k(diBPCeg!sT(diBPCeg!sT8 g|cg^~q?袊,+uǽoA 7_Q?{zĿg^_<^Bg~f?|rW& ,F'f+XJJ(U?##S?!~ OH8&T_H_S?*oaexY'ۏW~__g'O'{KS~__g'O'{K6^3}DO ),Ec?/؇_g RY+7W'0_U&=#nV'Rb9x UL_9x UL_dW{QE{G|osB^ң_:O(пf׿ A52gȿ HeC7c_+_>5GJk񂿡@?t(pbTJI+ 7S}+I$FU#OYYX~?ʿO/W= ? {GUJ(Kf~ ?_8W_ŗ3'SڿwFCpzJaEWßdQEG1|)CDڴOE<6ٳ R򭟸1_[^~g^MNtG|Mdf]yRQvjoT? /0ZvKrĬB_1.}k;ö!;{y6vK"`[v;p<#ak?aMg_WSP,t^{G3LaeZ=U'wek/!']d u$i%Ln4}BIx ,y|2=+KU%S|5%ʿ3gSwYtWkPuIue<9bT]y_3g(gB/h׺Io>xX5K+{ldڙTyR}St? ?COSۏ*8֨xq3L_Z"xΚΠށ?Cۿ\O>_Zj/|e>/[VDOiZvq,X`zyU?_~2~<O&jWLV|̗2Džx98w~֕>ϺE[-u~'@=v]ǩ5 UqԛTirweeWOM~(8< EOQ )];m'64oʃ*hqnV8*JT~音]?.qi,r~]}{+ׇ*{lYZ׼kKc8Tέ>e5XE)$k)[?R}ÿ\pH$w^AS_ʼMbxnXvQ[i9?? .渺j^I%NmYZ-{E/swkx*Sm5ۉOmRs p<32$8m˯%ٜ8[w4*JP\2kDdծ3o Z եRG%tuvqo8?hJ o mt Lbo!҉s_g9&O_Rύ'}+>leGekIuu"5|/!&NG2/';cN@I`|&zF#Q$eRF)l v5#]0Hfx^Rr{֑]I|[*֯ eo`0RtN:)J-ԗ7+ٻe~EIb xOzt6^'ѡkR(.gp<WXunmỷC*4r# V _i90u0G/^kc |Cx_7uGo$&.~a IEwa BgHa9^#s 빿jPKZjW^i}1:%6lda⯆eY ?I/~~¿ kHo<% 2 HSEA¬oYS=,ۚM_ҟ0#'aqYǿRtZ-|.nWmk~gMiivXŦiPCkm᷷E8tUE(Tzt>m-nYb8*Z4W//-~~)_hd~NDRZ0OU |ogxOp:&IWu{'eb}k߲5GJk񂿡@?t(pbTJI+ 7S}+I$FU#OYYX~?ʿO/W= ? {GUJ(Kf~ ?_8W_ŗ3'SڿwFCpzJaEWßdQEQE~Qb?ZG%GX5/k#9_~6@ɼr_G*8/T?¿O,g?JK+K -'Q럡?_$ GyiD~Uo+#mx#_mv+%vj!u? 3q~>i<#]_%>?aK!೟^|'b٫O'w?)s7Sjf?8G T+/_ל?kC9z3`RKU9?qE1_G&yc-kS$4?R/-7nD%~I灿7}<\w.'Njg}?|F^]OB1AEh0Ho. x~R?hui "[ 2:qWm^s}G'tQY9CH~f35+#%Ƨ]\!tMu濦$~HKYXQA$#4Q,OU G⿨$^&dFٓK&o".D濏< {-%o]?K7ӢU#R֦Kn?P袊?PƟ-1^#_+z+YLHJʿe C,c׃$ooL ο=Z2 dy鹟ϗjҿ)i:<-#VaKOGop! h౜~:9N(h౟r?pD~9ȉ?sK_O8JGtZ&yؼb_CW\;"7#.f?Š(`3o uJo uJ?:weмR1ʩI//)MQ^1OßgawizuœȺF((C#2׳E|-Jrdj(Q@Xawxr4ioo;mEcWK:d}̳I1sWy_:Q3Q%7/jdjKJ-~ m$E*XcЊ_ைi^ѬCipͨ IUfP(_hQE~ sKτQ?[5|.⾻y'Kf?yWWf?8?e?X#z l7^9_џW _G&yc-kR?N_G5;uk_?N!_~)ixw!+O< aHq?οw,SS?>mg7C_ۅ3K¿9<ɟߴ7F/*Q X6` 0`F (֏;;רW/XܐFi̷qe?\G㥗&+ėQP4C?,DP +/}]>/[5Λl~(rfvIE5꺞[k%Ķsuiu)c`áRs/i ^?ރskɟcp)t*%:PW г]]bv4Wl>Zx[]+TDM8Z[&=B);^KUhOmh+}䙄8YCܣ ':n;_ܯdx[F+–9+[4^"ӥN[0ϴk̰Ք1EW_o#r_qESJ&v/,gb?Q5}"~-z#_Jbzo} _<_l^OMu~Qǟ<O.AEW|xRqen:^xRqen:^g_x6_JaEWqث$ Ou_$$y?QѶ?_Td޿q{cƟ_D(C) ??=\SK olo|G?_S R?_yyiN[BKuOK/&G'K,OKR~ CJmZ+oWmRI_?EŹ_?X4OW$?mKiWi?x'N+?i c6؏\_T;+P((((((((((+f'/ Ӟ}k5'UeUv?݆PtO?|9NJ> xAQWʤxDu2L0x\U:ӯqf8E^> '|I>)BSb[Og*ʃ#>ƿg |z;៌IEA10`'Eo$U[eZUs7k#FTٯ\vML_j}'Uf}=!Y=E~^ao~źu營_(QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((((((((((((( ~<W"4U//4%g* 0<+->o?d| w_H|?6?ĶF(wS%D|jWԔWZYNg~_:ru;_Go`U~͞Wữj>1MFkxZ;ai|%q/gjVwpv1C,(2I5u]X( A讟?_/ ??k[˿i+*]V-Vet,dqE@zWkoЭ$jUU^`@86;j1ݳ˲RN涞HX߲Jt/K"_ Tn}־`dx.x u/-ԗ<4;K,z3O$lQ^.iS<<%ȬN2 'VHb'wvV?.?G$]7χ!:*@tBW%Au>'ߴozuϭzFms Njp*bTz+O~*>S5:vȏqs4ER5i=ـ(b#N1嶊߻=\6_ʌJW%ŧ .|O 躏ծ5%HwJK l F:'WE{xԛz%-p8b$Z?HoCuvA@tF.D@j~͞Vxg1xDҭ൶*Vf6ϧc,(%H_'Z<;Z>9b{۩F~4{/KoǤ)$785$]7χ!:+kԩ_8QROQ% F:'Q otN~n_O$mK}O?_7?k \iz/ek+Xܗϰ袾[eS+ =/gN0nw?Kl_o/k?kݜWZeݥޓ{u[yvסv>A诫JJ> NM$Ӿ;Qx6ݓwdH?#Ѿ|=G|{ߢn_O$W/ ?&rڕS߆ EqeBӬ,ٖF)0ic_?$_LEԭKxfR]ToGnd++Rt2xԱkeO/N*7o{{ QTg'+uvKyl~z~?~ԼA]"ֵm7CР4SigR^JvB !rBN(j+jgUJQ@+(Νqjŭmso(ܒE"ua0$_aw%'aqo +oib 1ϕ$?zeNH:E|_. ;xG_O~׎Yc*b2ƥ S+=,ԕݚևwo\C,gk%> |iOt K/, |򺪀>g_~Riז5EewߙG}=[у AU%({_S[DGo \6X\-̅hؐ cE~Ŝ/G8"N1m;_OTO &KIV0K\1ݏ<:W gXlΥR\uOgѭOK?`x⯅gYxK,H.G!nI!UIk+* RRiktK4ql-|΅:n^I_)v`+Ĉ.m䵻%Th@aAGJ8?'Zy2khӳOs[NOئh~Q_1!(8^5בW>-#xܖ/6KɫIkf__wmeOe;wg+),aqEr~&o;^1aw$kxxcg̿#;CsCKS%1ĽB [n 4wd&NJA=+4'!~~Ϛy6XC$k5]4WY@ E<,8JjIUf?8Em̱sj”ST$24ܮ|g9eoS.EϵZZ@MR xĪ$>Ѹq}+Fp%/ik[]+ƯmKL=*WjJ4ַP)BrxOnu>Ee57fbyn@=kbhg?&xz|(?8u҄(6(3/'%{vt_Z+4SE d,H5Q^ iЋKV>7̧TIJ&דm}5QEtq%l%B6 lPI ٯB+O;<С7l-Ԫ&4Q$S_Mo#D|SΏ3{cnm%_>Y-l3H܄nq:Z+3 .cVrRV 1Ӈa*Xi)s-m$L(3O~>4τnЭvڋ]Y-ys&6p>h?/ ӫO9K\Ϛ߅?[k<njk1AЦǑI&nR^^A_?jcǟ|)ui6|p^siC ΏW_p~; ^5>^xp^i<- -5&]E]{abZuڔ"H0(꺓Ws ǟxWIGͭ\iP&($`&W /o<CKH}vl)[ʗۡy7fJO:S<-嵒~~15>ʌ=9E+K|ܶپڅQ_`~FQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEgKE ?pʿk/:^#Lwj.p1"0Ԓ/osu):'-?#W*O#][_ن?Cmk? BH~8'l؁]GFYb::G :˅qWrߑ}I1ʼ:y1ږ ekYŞ {"ɫ&4?rFeڳc+jS=#5c8)gQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQE(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((}cgMj1G=O JHv2 +nQ|o1Ş<;%.l99>L _zWy+O$4oe9ы>zM+38c'վkUWoh.< %: ;PU8LnUۿGbf˳\?G:e kڌѡ je'Ȗt#5^N 2sj}arv[{XFF|A}*8&c>L;ްߩQEՅQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@((((((((((((((3I_wſۃo.ih5WY[EʥFFy5[?=-wwލe,njM (wؐ (g5^2EJi4.XO/:te(iE㾜ײZҮGZLs C/X,u7['i xdʹI8`y#_P3ǍuAڭW2 &qAh$%]s I=kȎPS5{>H cNtpX օvԻ%׵%k奘" G]3*^XȻ$.tq_E SX~޿I?-nzFPVֿ_ϗ񃯞oeeJ15.guk&&ykfԩb:.FqZ?๱G'~֨FF*nnlxψSW>fϿcVQK>hAãUe$­W싦xTdxwJQqm:ÐK8wF<j ?m?w>'rQUϔ4 f5 zIvFpA#y ڮUƼ7k=޶G.UMD9[_Ef&BU\,ruFCÂ3y#Zbϡsh`0U"ڧ&G  "xM55 k\'Fq0s_?Wǝ<_j7!$g`v!AֽoB6*Ѿ}HO+QN˕'۩;HH'9$ѐ+;W?)i_.*(ֳpm4FURrP@$$9\QEY*|}QgJb.m.XRwmZy~BIc텢nߊuRfLۣ̏ tzOFRj^\У$Yݳ<2فUT>{a24xY^&|2+3FR5T+\[E;*1f?gP|egRIs~ߤu夛6RPȾX)TQW|<0Ө˕/e?z()7 ϠJL,Iv(# ao"xM>RIxA}M|uг~zg_x˟ԺD-\NLcWFOq#'q8LUx{gekhw?@s^7ACOY9Dm~\&AZ_$~,0Wre'ukEE^[zRdPk>Z)3(8"(Z[WpO6E7s2}(ӵ]/Xfs;y,u_Yd_a ~g?~ [p;^:?嵿>rNkܶo?W*iEծ [4ڮW ROغ\?##?޸2'17nfO{3wr7k}7V6Qn)HnRFGhW?eXx?*P]O g/1˰_i+^WQE7_U~~հxK᷌KXI6acj3[p#e]͵A8zWFMi}O;xIjnj6VE:?W(U~~ i?_ -.ujme,n- H 8c=|(Fy5{)G=Ko*p}3_CPSC=5Ie|{*9]^JZv\7k~QIq3_*~-<):@sҖ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( KjGeD{oDi,m' $kC_ZօiSjAȊ-Oj:Oլ[\"x削:0 U?/ؖϝ|7>\vg>!'MO+pfI?goۿ]q臌A1KY "t?BZ?Fn~!ٷo{&eqhG1ʽ=̾[3<oeZ,<(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((BccD4]?u˛k-|<@'ș˃+ ~_ />|,֙o6OeI6"DΉn®x<^_.f Y')=k,R.ۓGXdȯo۫Yu~,tE4MQu h&-[ f}l+~/ O4]OsN_}CtU(-?xf=K=;XԼS:k:2d02!pX8FA|u _ß4&'6eD>FX aq+!x6m4KAeiCdF`/Jfk9k FS|W^=Lfy /Eу>im7 ?n?)zopFhw/gy 5[q\NiX%& " k"޿CMWC"áǔGq&FyrG|QAI=];5qcyS|Hi}}:?Ik F}R-^L#&XYKngN#rIuaSI⯍:Wn;m jiU[8<$#A__o#/ ".}E@}:7]DKEv&9eu:*2K'P>-կ5{kXKdtae`#k#__>.JVq3]*ef x(ӿk_~hxo+ZJ/ U-?&}=lehf-Jj2v[k =\]g'St{^k[$pQ|;ZB4٧ E.ty4ɼ@%1#9[;GҾQkO⬑z׃uy%ۑI&YBQSm\u̱ʑjBn Z.N&Ai4z۫}a4-8RpE~L`NKύڏ Z*ims$x,('g|2M$Vze.uv*%Q_2GV0!B GȞ1||pտgc SZ xM͚!2<ǁ §#FJޗ4H׎a*J`j:tݛOWUg{y3 ]w;ۯ%x÷u /VQ880R<-XWC#8G 88P񴩫%3?Giz鱟P(HDpm291|w>|U'?įw]WZ,aCp{;T5Os懨/o.y17dw{I[]}/|<}Oy_7-?+?P |y=Hk KT!JK &WJ_Gvxٯ jڟcۙC@U2Oӓ؊^I|Kd/+p\"A: l'ƺ΍7Uu颂Mb<#fvlWV>0piьm^pcs,f+RRPa.Uo9]BEYWW>?|rcPiqh:|{-'P)eU$^S\9sREYSQIe]ʤD )wwֽꔣ,JS6.U(]ӷ^fm1\X =kU|~7ox]ӓºXڄP,ڪH#PZ_Ow'Hۘ1ki=gk'탨:L;ug_%ыcK۟ !*)NwI׹k$D5OٷQn<[ulW(eLo!b$ʪw h!gIծ}][a(Q *\@k_\5’dbF}0+D)QdXetqe#9q(7rKęd񸺐 F%dmO;|!]?c'Fnoy] S1Y¹n(~BpIOV6 BO{M|`a1%PNyjw _eVh ź VWΝco詻*3?`ƻ!c[ 42D؈B=@ʝN׏3}KdmƼգM_$aRm7tގyWGW?IՂc,_o*jrܤs_?W >.h&{*KM̱pvڼ }E z!?:`~x2I.s{ Pgu(QQi};q.i|Qʥ9r_]]v_{z|@>+㩼GˍgI^SѼoΡdr3_ +S\|2|aY8|E`b-͉v001ҿȒxSK2[Ne b\_OLedڕbIm6e >W)6j꼞G'>%/FVXc>o'O,Ee_xgN{]1̰ؼLr0o{u?`o(?|XOٗ̚in4+ovg6Um`9O+o9>ῊC\xu/,aHnt*6䎕Źmu_?9JG-̾} dǡ׮qxC+z0u,4M%R N|&iĹQj_YEMnￓv~2?g]G>7дR[ lS,ey˰~ŗ66c%\ [7ܮF6N+B*|j(Gt }*lHNfVz*XvaqtF1jZz}fedٶQQeQNWQZ%Ms|!Chg#kGII  9[Б'[V2+[ xK?hu+\%Q[kXN= &Aoѿ|)g_~i\Mq-v,xT\qkﲧY4?ٵ]-c.4ATm7sN?JAgG֯6s_*^Dbۿ~3 CdF%SR!qr/nvhA ݁8`)W?X9YK=U[ym\IJq<^~%j d,//ؘN0֥(Ӎem_ˡy`xLEU:i>کyG^47jA6j>;oNu- ]d1FkY ǻq_?No ;k%Z/z&NWE0 Wƚϊ.i\&Ohf>A'ꚗwhmN[Q򈦖%O->XfMJSM+|X5^ϲ>:Q''=+ݻ3h|et>!<=_]ei}9KF*#R#1}~zKϊ~մ)8bX=|mv1~l|[o ij\L!WFK\k|CC B8F?9v'fPT傖Jܱ-_S2x~+MO <:fhz>XaKΛyȯ; h ?ΏFI.>"XXhkyGѐnF8_/?,0E p9Ng8E [:o)U[Zrn!V|ͻ6=-+է/|Us}h2˨\_((7 nb\W"ZѥŨ:5<Mta\?HZMjm?DA+g*Hfzq[x<&;R :Z˯E3㬁R/֔Uki>V}mtO|S.<5K{hoWR/DDy,L E ;O77ņw6xe1V=G/-Qsu񚢾9 7D?A\ûmvy\=7ɒ|njJ3J svVVwtNMyt+N8QS|5mS4QOٷW>v&־FtBDMqq< Qצk_q:>./usg{=lso<ʳ-Ck/RKZ؁9KlK]^x`Wxjy_6۟ 1|3,-*)|ZǓֽܶ?_4/蒉Ho&^ $`kc iݵmNMݸ!"}Ï gMc |:7&i]\1I%a &୷2jo-?2x4y5{Qi\丕Ӝ^V=?#9&iJKV>$,Q0᳃)Ӕ{ ~6x׆ao|` i%?gxbtZVZɇm̟~92uUXlﺙ1~~߳K~CnVu, DR([/*o~_`Խz)ha/&5yu}Nf_2dibk?`oƌ--ΣJrmdGr;O=$ךVZB@fS^ۯ> sk|EU-ic=?R}k1FoiQ>U3gg;ҷ''n_ſ_`zQ^mݬ1W|d)T 85[C ;u/:qk7S5ݦ@3ܒgrF}7z֛o񌚸uKv!˅#زZ?V$uljM#DoXf[bѩ?J F RW;sLv;52ZJb֎Nvzbx{Wz&BOs|im6w4-g Bs⾡>Ydږ"oo}fysH1j,7 ߰u*ycUdvzma)|V\zlzA<%}_V5xmߎ3/nMJYLq6y{y Fd>l?oo$WM^g\Ԭdtm戼A(?,T^>-m Fa>mS<$=,fZ~M^M]^L0di$: $tZ牆3B<[k}/>[_YƣiKI]rrf릵޿MouO a#G8jO|Pm^xC^ u WN+fbG.<_Poilc.Rv8C *AgO' ]^aFH2]!X\+_#?Sd`b"< af-Cd3mnnnH^RLՆ?g saI4Y4"\Ťgl3qX嘊ԨSNRI5ku۩3&Xna:2)ANfV>F_)'ĚM NFٷ-Y۴dM7mH$?|c1}?K E(|7Ouk-o5=G]mt&8a%grr28Kִo#d #VO eGKܭ֏lcb,<4pMGMOz_gc3+Bo.V[ɥ=9ok~~:O ~:k.WTQlLc->WRƼiKZϯ*Wߌk_/u3 U枛j8=6FjVWk~{[_ŋVɪ@6!k[x.q޿]~C?f3? >y^iDc]ϙ;/P=Mw66Kqim @";Fy߱[w촍Z% dua^O.t?i彾]K2J?W徺ߖnC"[O iGB;i}2YOq6&6kcmo :dٱoy4zgOX愛b!úH9BPFGTV+E~ l4%0#&Xq`Rmzppv g̠wvRԣno__7UoSuiMlrζ{pMb/<kQ?.4~+ut+{q=" VX;$Ͽ؛ǿu_|x'cM{佻{DЫZrjO +Ao CkkʓP"9F1nWrA+دC <Ӎo̿0\ƕ*&% 4gy9t_j9d(kwFh4L,8([tjW''8.$ӣm> ^$+jfy"RImems<>]UьNݷ̽{8~ߴO'W->We p%TrE~ Ib>Ww7vnߑk(Q^[lo|Mq[HTP#(B2۩$9&nMGI:ArWQ@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@Q@p~1eЭĚ}Iui]@E-WHSF=kk}OŦJ7Q^ZN 8t`GkS  9l>~iwZ>k{)$pq_A|_P^_\,pf\"/ ìP[Ugc DzV߇@i'ߏ;&^EylNu_M;f\h3NW?j=w ;o5 $oP+S nӣ?G-k Wt!'Un ;dU2Z+|'(҅w}M L)ƭN_z2qVZ]V3O.^k $Cmv]rzğH"r38zXPcg;ٴ}No. !S'%:W,LQɧ(|Y OJ.4k&ӻn}Ŀ~ B'!g'Ėxjz4ΒB.Vq˃.[O /M1i}4WtYGS_tVq+*uZ獵EN7.l*q8kk/2OQ|Ex}SOܖhfpU$?5?k(w㉬4Y"i|bVsӌWAEua Jdz^?ܲ*2JS^n*O/_ֿj~+ik- O|찳?;F\)deC(xgV*|)9ʩ㰕um՝CS[K 3CZMf0Q_N~ϟાk|/mG.o'"Y-@ma/>Q_tWb8U%:0ׯ.}?=|%'JTqtwvP'~Ժ_Z+,ZjPş/{-l+qG?ċ{?G4ZT -Wks? 2V6xFSd-[OoQ:aoዝ+TҴˋ}B)y ۢq'Ԛ[  ]Zg|}oxAhm EݴvFP̌$KEe[13Gtxyd.T۳zݻVZΗ¯''}6?\h?UuwYmչ#w8i<l?aOOiZe>O*5Xx{4Wq^O59"1ɰ , WF(ĸStҋWm]'neĬSsTe9.xdgyhWs; ~?Ə▙akjZ iSj\dK7"r2r}k?߰k;.-GC5oؤp` H%IHb8Z+:C-ctS6ц-K$iʋm|4cc #?˸hfI3o3G%տVXm.UƥA' +>~¿?sњ'涷Bn-qW+w_TVs֨+Zb8:<c?]r*Yʜgm;ugFuSFH^0Y$h̀<820@^s^7C?hOw|MsMlM=VHY9#i.#ԥ}c<7/%)6zwm[ RxcYUK;A.2[rÆ$~?Oے_84<8ڏ B٨ŹWEsa3zcZK=jWP4kM6{ӟ<3 31N'6V<< 21ʊ~ҵӲ|g~|ك\a bM2בM&daҼ \)UrI$9}Ew㸂z~ťU"ĬbsQ+)T~4xK !`az3ZMTKVVOW K<;oMWwi~"@3|]Yi]Clupl[A;yA YfiW Wzb14ӳMl?@_4WSϫrׂJe۶\x pRr]mW~Zg s7|YhAgiy}adcVZ\DHi8'|1^|W?3,Y&koG*\^JzX4RHi^8K.T}hL7'GmN%oxHtocyjL 898;Džg+{(+{dTÔu3 + be)xUӪ熩R[*J0^CW;F9j:}ϥߢ/o4l29=8W&~7P~Z^#4Dl|NgMb췰E!ɷwth.!<3TFg?_ھ/G-sxЃXeO#Ÿt浹|'rjm{>y{;K3|o0O-i!sh:~ *$.('c$_Ko?gix>2Y6.w#-Зwq3>EytZiiQ,%\ыR-kUo=5>G~Ϋ=SE}E~;.[yO w997\ֽg GuEr^=흃6}!% !sU|M>+9ּo2xƐXm= Qix5̸~@AnIC`W/(]7ݯ>R4YFۂPMWZYh~y;?g_{⽼n>^FlnRnR@<{W_Wڶ>:4hz^ܙg>ҏhdv7fzh58 [{/̹/> {[ⵯk!C~uޑX:6yL-=vJJڒW=N+\6q){'uk?< 7娼u{V'i*pC+Ue=+τZ]>(Ԅ]={4Ip~|Gk;c -Z\4 {iJ.q]g%tKV؈6Պ(;9ު+'ŸV淩xN7St79:i;ڟᖿ+bvP;6;;ʅ7|g>4/,1YI^ii;m!cuzj <",~}F+0:Vnτ8.xÈ 5&ͤ7-m{'2?0J%F*x2bpoR..Jy>,~|_4vQ+[A;a~CE;wn[:BJ/wm>$~Ζ:HhVf{lΦ[Qss : y8nٳķw G{,y[( ϷJL}_YZzA ҩW5)Fq~4|Yc> ~9] MGZ+$-+h31Z_/k]Οuj4k-Fb1f@A n ez+ ڟW!ba\O8lEJܦܮk[<ygjm>Zi^6|*3G5Q^ܟShҍ8F+/QE&EPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP_G1pG@VVZE4˟O6ԅc1j 1ڿ!>;YmG95,UGy⾃?ioGgx/aMo_Տ_ K\_~44uv-4CbȤ;WYbHCeaAv*yYX`PGFqiCºr.5 !vY!Nm~2Zշƞ.+ouk>_1?T袊Т(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((yʿim_IڦgX82f kG Y~Ժ\yz_-/};aF,dd3.8 ~߳)o ~{ƹoM݆8s_ȟŸ>%77<+CxsX֬$^[IVU8kK4y$jKg3bx ǝm{?BO_<;G.xNEM.i2.Y6:<&pqn2ZWAET((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((/࿇h~+‿b>uϗ$|G|(Ys_׍5.] S+y;9ZTpCkY p7'_8|aѡ |JƮH/Ǖ18 'Ü˒=([G?a?ܯc'Ϯ~zߙx T7Z\27Br%z_}\+7"A34QeXfhn''_k㌷c8'ϯ8gM?(>((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+ ]#k__4?x?Pľut7v( fTuך++.*B*CJph.XoX Footer1  !!B*CJPJ_HmH phsH tH L/"L Free FormB*PJ_HmH phsH tH nC`2n Body Text Indent `)B*CJOJPJQJ_HmH phsH tH 2/A2 9 WW8Num2z0OJQJ6/Q6 9 WW8Num3z0 CJOJQJ6/a6 9 WW8Num3z1 CJOJQJ6/q6 9 WW8Num3z2 CJOJQJJ/J 9Absatz-StandardschriftartP/P 9WW-Absatz-StandardschriftartR/R 9WW-Absatz-Standardschriftart12/2 9 WW8Num1z0OJQJ6/6 9 WW8Num2z1 OJQJ^J 2/2 9 WW8Num2z2OJQJ2/2 9 WW8Num5z0OJQJ6/6 9 WW8Num5z1 OJQJ^J 2/2 9 WW8Num5z2OJQJ2/2 9 WW8Num7z0OJQJ6/!6 9 WW8Num7z1 OJQJ^J 2/12 9 WW8Num7z2OJQJ2/A2 9 WW8Num9z0OJQJ6/Q6 9 WW8Num9z1 OJQJ^J 2/a2 9 WW8Num9z2OJQJ4/q4 9 WW8Num10z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num10z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num10z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num11z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num11z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num11z2OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num14z0 CJOJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num14z1 CJOJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num14z2 CJOJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num15z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num15z1 OJQJ^J 4/!4 9 WW8Num15z2OJQJ4/14 9 WW8Num16z0OJQJ8/A8 9 WW8Num16z1 OJQJ^J 4/Q4 9 WW8Num16z2OJQJ4/a4 9 WW8Num17z0OJQJ8/q8 9 WW8Num17z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num17z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num18z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num18z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num18z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num19z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num19z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num19z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num20z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num20z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num20z2OJQJ4/!4 9 WW8Num21z0OJQJ8/18 9 WW8Num21z1 OJQJ^J 4/A4 9 WW8Num21z2OJQJ4/Q4 9 WW8Num22z0OJQJ8/a8 9 WW8Num22z1 OJQJ^J 4/q4 9 WW8Num22z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num24z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num24z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num24z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num26z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num26z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num26z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num30z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num30z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num30z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num31z0OJQJ8/!8 9 WW8Num31z1 OJQJ^J 4/14 9 WW8Num31z2OJQJ4/A4 9 WW8Num32z0OJQJ8/Q8 9 WW8Num32z1 OJQJ^J 4/a4 9 WW8Num32z2OJQJ4/q4 9 WW8Num34z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num34z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num34z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num35z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num35z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num35z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num36z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num36z1 OJQJ^J 4/4 9 WW8Num36z2OJQJ4/4 9 WW8Num37z0OJQJ8/8 9 WW8Num37z1 OJQJ^J 4/!4 9 WW8Num37z2OJQJB' 1B 9Comment ReferenceCJaJ.)A. 9 Page Number(/Q( 9ipa1OJ QJ .X a. 9Emphasis6],/q, 9verse B*phz/z 9Normal + (Latin) Arial Char+CJOJPJ QJ\^J_HaJmH sH tHFV F 9FollowedHyperlink >*B* phLL 9Headingj$x*$CJPJ ^J aJtH>B> 9 Body Text kx*$PJtH$/$ 9ListlF"F 9Captionm $xx*$6PJ]tH44 9Indexn $*$PJtHHH 9 Comment Texto*$CJPJ aJtHTT 9 Balloon Textp*$CJOJ PJQJ ^J aJtHR^R 9 Normal (Web)qd*$CJPJaJtH> @"> 9Footerr!*$PJtH>@2> 9Headers!*$PJtHDjD 9Comment Subjectt 5PJ\FRF 9closeudd*$]^`PJtHD0bD 9 List Bullet v & F*$PJ tH^r^ 9Normal + (Latin) Arial w*$7$` PJ \tH</< 9Char5CJOJQJ^JaJtHz/zo0Colorful Shading - Accent 11y%B*CJPJ_HaJmH phsH tH TT ' E Medium Grid 1 - Accent 2 z^m$jOj }1n Quotations#{-DM ]^5B*OJQJaJ phSSRzOz 1nChapter heading!|$ !&dP,Sva$5;B*CJ OJQJaJ ph,Svd/d {1nQuotations Char-5B*CJPJ^JaJ fHphSSRq  O p Grid Table 31~$$ Fd*$@& 4B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJmH nHph6_sH tH`/` |1nChapter heading Char5;B*CJ PJ^JaJ ph,SvT@T1npTOC 2 ! @&^OJQJ]aJmHnHuV@V 1npTOC 1 ! x5B*OJQJ\^JaJph,SvN@N1npTOC 3 ! ^OJQJaJmHnHuhO2h 1n Panel Heading$ |*$a$5:B*CJOJQJaJph,Sv66 O pTOC 4P^:/Q: s^H0 Header Char CJaJtH\/a\ 1nPanel Heading Char5:B*CJPJ^JaJph,SvXOrX 1nBullet Heading*$5B*CJOJQJaJph,Svl/l mRManuscript Cover Page%B*CJPJ_HaJmH phsH tH Z/Z 1nBullet Heading Char5B*CJPJ^JaJph,Sv~ ~ mRMedium Shading 1 - Accent 1,CJOJPJQJ^J_HaJmH nHsH tHz/z mR!Medium Shading 1 - Accent 1 Char1 CJOJPJQJ^JaJnHtHba b Minor Heading Grey & Fd@&` B*phSSRj/j Minor Heading Grey Char$5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJphSSR~~ Level 1--Section HeadingdM ,SvB*OJQJ^Jph/ Level 1--Section Heading Char<5B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJnHphq ,SvtH Level 2--Review Statement)dh@&P]C5;B*ph,Sv|/ | Level 2--Review Statement Char'5;B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph,SvJ " J Blue BarM MxCJaJf/1 f  Blue Bar Char45;B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph,Svq MxrB r Level 3--Case Study$h*$@&P]C5;B* phMxtHt/Q t Level 3--Case Study Char+5;B* CJOJPJQJ^JaJphMxtHr b r Minor Heading Blue+x 0!x!P;aJj/q j Minor Heading Blue Char$5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph,SvPa P Minor Heading Teald B*phDj/ j Minor Heading Teal Char$5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJphDn n Non-TOC Heading&dh!@&P]C5;B*ph,Svd d Numbering--Listsx1$`m$B*PJaJphd/ d Numbering--Lists Char!B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJpht t  Orange line"xhP]C^h!B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph8/ 8 Orange line Char` `  Numbering_ACT ^h`0!B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph</ < Numbering_ACT Chard  d qkReflect Qs List ^8`0!B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph@/! @ qkReflect Qs List CharN2 N qkCase Study text x^ B*\phSSRd/A d qkCase Study text Char$B*CJOJPJQJ\^JaJphSSRPR P qkReview Statement text B*ph,Svn/a n qkReview Statement text Char!B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph,Svnr n1nCover Series Title $1$a$#5B*CJTPJ aJTmHnHph,Svuv/ v1nCover Series Title Char/5B*CJTOJPJ QJ^JaJTmHnHph,SvubO b 1nCover Lesson Title1$B*CJHPJ aJHnHphDtHp/ p 1nCover Lesson Title Char)B*CJHOJPJ QJ^JaJHnHphDtH` ` 1nCover Doc Type $1$a$B*CJ8PJ aJ8nHphtHh/ h 1nCover Doc Type Char)B*CJ8OJPJ QJ^JaJ8nHphtH8 8 IInterview text> > IProfessor name$a$> > IInterview text Char^O ^ O9Body-D1$M `B*OJPJQJ^JaJ ph> > IProfessor name CharD " D 0 Sub-bullet56B*aJph64P2 P 0Placard1$]^B*PJaJphN/A N 0 Placard CharB*CJOJQJ^JaJph81 R 8 90 Quotation B* phPR/a R 90Quotation CharB* CJOJQJ^JaJphPnr n unnumbered sequence0*$1$@&^`0m$5PJaJtHd/ d unnumbered sequence Char5CJOJQJ^JaJtHV/ V footer !!B*CJPJ_HmH phsH tH \/ \ Body Text Indent CharB*CJOJPJQJphF/ F r Footer CharCJOJQJ^JaJtHB B u'Host 1$`B* PJaJphHL/ L u' Host Char!B* CJOJPJQJ^JaJphHZ Z u'Iconic Outline & F7$8$H$B*PJaJph`/ ` u'Iconic Outline Char!B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph$/ $ YD's1CJaJT T YD'quotes1$]^6OJPJ QJ^JaJ>/! > YD' quotes Char6CJPJ aJ`Q 2 ` YD'quote2]^'6B*CJOJPJ QJ]^JaJphJ/A J YD' quote2 Char6B*CJPJ ]aJphVS V YD'Medium Shading 1 - Accent 3:V0PMPMPMPMPMPMj%@PMPM ߧj ߧjQ jQ jQ  j j 44]B*OJPJQJ^Jph5\ph5\ph5\ph5\phV/b V _header !!B*CJPJ_HmH phsH tH >/q > _ Char5CJOJQJ^JaJtHx/ x _ Medium Shading 1 - Accent 1 Char CJOJPJQJ^JaJnHtH2 2_ SG Outline F.( . _ Line Number` ` _Intro Text First*$7$8$H$@OJPJQJ^JaJ\ \ _ Intro Text*$7$8$H$`@OJPJQJ^JaJ6/ 6 _huge1CJOJQJaJo(N/ N o_Comment Text CharOJPJ QJ^JtH  _Medium Grid 2 - Accent 1-:V0{{{{{j%@ jj jD{{{{jQ{{{{ O44(fdfd CJOJPJQJ^JaJnHtHLO L 1nScripture quotes5B*\ph,SvJ/ J 1nHeading 3 Char5CJOJQJ\aJN/! N 1nHeading 4 Char5CJOJQJ\^JaJT/1 T 1nHeading 5 Char 56CJOJQJ\]^JaJPK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭Vj\{cp/IDg6wZ0s=Dĵw %;r,qlEآyDQ"Q,=c8B,!gxMD&铁M./SAe^QשF½|SˌDإbj|E7C<bʼNpr8fnߧFrI.{1fVԅ$21(t}kJV1/ ÚQL×07#]fVIhcMZ6/Hߏ bW`Gv Ts'BCt!LQ#JxݴyJ] C:= ċ(tRQ;^e1/-/A_Y)^6(p[_&N}njzb\->;nVb*.7p]M|MMM# ud9c47=iV7̪~㦓ødfÕ 5j z'^9J{rJЃ3Ax| FU9…i3Q/B)LʾRPx)04N O'> agYeHj*kblC=hPW!alfpX OAXl:XVZbr Zy4Sw3?WӊhPxzSq]y )F0)FI   $ $0**=****A bb1111111{4k "$!9sOYCo{ҙP!a+-246e7888^ '%?L[ItY  ,m35788  {  # % / J L Z u w  ! < > F a c o *-A\_s!-HKf 9<Hcfs0X %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%q#&|6NP!X!!! ,R$/ Ͳ9MC  @H 0(  q(    s >A? jPicture 1c"$?6  X?"Text Box 2C"ÂPK!8[Content_Types].xmlAN0EH%N@%邴K@`dOdlyLhoDX3'AL:*/@X*eRp208J妾)G,R}Q)=HiҺ0BL):T뢸WQDY;d]6O&8* VCLj"󃒝 yJ.;[wIC_ :{IOA !>Ø4 p;fɑ3׶Vc.ӵn(&poPK!8! _rels/.relsj0 }qN/k؊c[F232zQLZ%R6zPT]( LJ[ۑ̱j,Z˫fLV:*f"N.]m@= 7LuP[i?T;GI4Ew=}3b9`5YCƵkρؖ9#ۄo~e?zrPK!ڒ drs/e2oDoc.xmlSێ }@7sfv[U^~8F~}M*a3s hr>(VifMIܶ\e7ׯ6zЭAlh"^fEg]΃!یuR/]d$Q-I{z8 ÕŤg{9{QC.N 9 Sϝ\P2+>zZFXnErd\ѓgqkrf#X[a%o*ENH ZL2yC1cΤR^.j.U(׹u_CҁQb/OR2 J}mj"Vu4.{ȕΘ@Dtfl= YĿOJCFÏ=Ѣr7$4nB1*d2b-ީGT˩h,7v PK!<drs/downrev.xmlLAK@aM#IM Mv Ά6񤗁yjsuq 'EN1&OlۛJ_CP(XJZNX;I3 AII{Vb=Nٚ]+7yØ4 p;fɑ3׶Vc.ӵn(&poPK!8! _rels/.relsj0 }qN/k؊c[F232zQLZ%R6zPT]( LJ[ۑ̱j,Z˫fLV:*f"N.]m@= 7LuP[i?T;GI4Ew=}3b9`5YCƵkρؖ9#ۄo~e?zrPK!# drs/e2oDoc.xmlSn0 }45] YI&)/%i}HQ<9VWd/}P`NJJ(e݇%%!rp V2z^߿[t P.FWE4=fKy7ny 4?njwʳ^"]=+a ,RXT_RPK-!8[Content_Types].xmlPK-!8! /_rels/.relsPK-!# .drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK-!qgdrs/downrev.xmlPKx   X?jText Box 2"0?? B S  ? 0Q q% T(R8`@L< & T _Hlt77151392 _Hlt77151393 _Toc70002067 _Toc70002068 _Toc70002069 _Toc70002070 _Toc70002071 _Toc70002072 _Toc70002073 _Toc70002074 _Toc70002075 _Toc70002076 _Toc70002077 _Toc70002078 _Toc70002079 _Toc70002080 _Toc70002081 _Toc70002082 _Toc70002083 _Toc70002084 _Toc70002085 _Toc70002086 _Toc70002087 _Toc70002088 _Toc70002089 _Toc70002090 _Toc70002091 _Toc70002092 _Toc70002093 _Toc70002094 _Toc70002095Y!?%%7>CtGSH_Ilowy؋A[7g9$0@@ c!F%07>CGSM_Rl-owy Sk"@pC $0JJHNq$x$q+{+++,,,,,,,,,0000 rM     $$17172727RRG_G_M_M_CgDgoottcucu x xyyPQhihituss,-  $,,--//f// 0;00 rM     $$17172727RRG_G_M_M_CgDgoottcucu x xyyPQhihituss,-  $,0r[vO[TO+B C( ;$UBfaN`vx>Ih^`hB*CJEHo(ph64.hh^h`B*CJEHo(ph.hh^h`B*CJEHo(ph.hph^h`pB*CJEHo(ph.h@ h^h`@ B*CJEHo(ph.hxh^h`xB*CJEHo(ph.hHh^h`HB*CJEHo(ph.hh^h`B*CJEHo(ph.hh^h`B*CJEHo(ph. ^`CJOJQJ ^`CJOJQJo pp^p`CJOJQJ @ @ ^@ `CJOJQJ ^`CJOJQJ ^`CJOJQJ ^`CJOJQJ ^`CJOJQJ PP^P`CJOJQJ0^`05OJQJ\o(.hh^h`o(.88^8`o(.^`o(.  ^ `o(.  ^ `o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(. h^h`B*o(ph,Sv.^`o(.^`o(.^`o(.^`o(()p^p`o(() ^ `o(.@ ^@ `o(. ^ `o(.0^`0.0^`0.p0p^p`0.@ 0@ ^@ `0.0^`0.0^`0.0^`0.0^`0.P0P^P`0. 0^`05\o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L. ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(pL^p`L^J.@ ^@ `^J.^`^J.L^`L^J.^`^J.^`^J.PL^P`L^J. faC($UvxTO+faWW8Num3WW8Num5WZd        _>W        3V-?Ve],UeII|d% U_|}@Zj @ ~ z 45 ^,;A,]a (9 ToO QG*[BC|*]kQ +2+ >p >R?.@q@BB*BiPBC76D' EE "EhGGH^Hm>IxJ(L}MpNgdPXnR4S*U^U)W~xW/XdX/4ZbK[{[oO\]D^N&_&b}(b1btKbfxcUKeJfbfgsgIkLlLlrlwTm1nGn Hn_ni@obo%Spiqgrru"u vP3vZv_vxx:xPxadxyb:zS{q{g>|j}J dvoP^ >(~9u}[U_,7+#=,*5X(u_:qkU6u5`Rd_U [8%.7__W N%'N**7od2Ye#(Ubw=,%(PLg,%'Yf(yQX\^usiN]b sI/Occ w mRmo^Bx).*8d1.Cp7:kk05OViMWewst_>$K#MorEo+|`cNnm z |Xl'< I0bfktwFS:i(,@G+!>TJ,Z\H .m7L-bIoF6BV%'&7Y}993G&Xx'd_w,,@MMMM0@UnknownG.[x Times New Roman5^Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.*{$ Calibri?.M Lucida SansC.,*{$ Calibri LightW., z 0000҉0 Pro W3Yu Gothic?= *Cx Courier New;^MWingdingsW Greek ParseCourier NewWinheritTimes New Roman;(SimSun[SOK. DejaVu SansArial5. .[`)Tahoma7@CambriaK=   jMS Gothic-3 0000G=  jMS Mincho-3 fg7. [ @VerdanaA$BCambria Math"qh)'g,"," Q,Q, C#q@P?rO92!xx,m kMacintosh HD:Users:kristenspanjer:Downloads:sammanuscripts:IIIM_MultimediaManuscript_template (May2019).dotBuilding Systematic TheologyKristen Spanjer Lauren Denney,       Oh+'0 x     ' Building Systematic TheologyKristen SpanjerlMacintosh HD:Users:kristenspanjer:Downloads:sammanuscripts:IIIM_MultimediaManuscript_template (May2019).dotLauren Denney6Microsoft Office Word@k@"T@ͷ7@_M', ՜.+,D՜.+,x4x  ' Microsoft"Q, Building Systematic Theology TitleL(V^j_PID_LINKBASE _PID_HLINKS'AA _http://www.thirdmill.org/k<http://thirdmill.org/scribd  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZ[]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F(]'@Data T1Table\cWordDocument SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStore\'\'2J01WEAAJ1A==2\'\'Item  PropertiesUCompObj r   F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q