ࡱ> { Wbjbjzz 7MBvvvvv8V]62L~=]?]?]?]?]?]?]$_bc]vc]vvHx] ^vv=] =] NOT : LQ0)]]0]Q$jc "jc`TTjcvT< c]c] ]jc <:  ESEA FLEXIBILITY PART A MONITORING REPORT FOR THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION The U.S. Department of Education (Department) is committed to supporting State educational agencies (SEAs) as they implement ambitious reform agendas through their approved ESEA flexibility requests. Consistent with this commitment, the Department has developed a monitoring process that is designed to both ensure that each SEA implements its plan fully, effectively, and in a manner that is consistent with its approved request and the requirements of ESEA flexibility, as well as support each SEA with technical assistance to help ensure its implementation increases the quality of instruction and improves student achievement for all students in the State and its local educational agencies (LEAs). Through this process, the Department aims to productively interact with SEAs and shift from a focus primarily on compliance to one focused on outcomes. For the 20122013 school year, the Department has divided its ESEA flexibility monitoring process into three components, which are designed to align with the real-time implementation occurring at the SEA, LEA, and school levels and be differentiated based on an SEAs progress and depth of work: Part A provided the Department with a deeper understanding of each SEAs goals and approaches to implementing ESEA flexibility and ensured that each SEA had the critical elements of ESEA flexibility in place to begin implementation of its plan in the 20122013 school year. Part A was conducted through desk monitoring. Parts B and C, which are under development, will include a broader look at an SEAs implementation of ESEA flexibility across all three principles, including its transition to college- and career-ready standards, its process for developing and implementing teacher and principal evaluation and support systems, and follow-up monitoring on the implementation of interventions in priority and focus schools. Parts B and C reviews also will include a closer examination of the use of annual measureable objectives (AMOs), graduation rate targets, and other measures to drive supports and incentives in other Title I schools. In addition, Parts B and C monitoring will address select unwaived Title I requirements and any next steps identified in the ESEA Flexibility Part A Monitoring Report. These reviews will be conducted through a combination of on-site monitoring, desk monitoring, and progress checks that will be differentiated based on an individual SEAs circumstances and request. The format of future reports may vary from Part A. The Department will support each SEA in its implementation of ESEA flexibility across all three monitoring components and will work with each SEA to identify areas for additional technical assistance. This ESEA Flexibility Part A Monitoring Report provides feedback to the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (WDPI) on its progress in implementing the components of ESEA flexibility identified in the document titled  HYPERLINK "http://www.ed.gov/esea/flexibility/documents/monitoring-part-a-protocol.doc" ESEA Flexibility Part A Monitoring Protocol to ensure the SEA implements ESEA flexibility fully, effectively, and in a manner that is consistent with the SEAs approved request and the requirements of ESEA flexibility. This report is based on information provided through SEA-submitted documentation, a monitoring call conducted with WDPI staff on September 6, 2012 and a follow up exit conference held on September 26, 2012. Generally, this report does not reflect steps taken by the SEA after the exit conference. The report consists of the following sections: Highlights of the WDPIs Implementation of ESEA Flexibility. This section identifies key accomplishments in the SEAs implementation of ESEA flexibility as of the SEAs monitoring call on September 6, 2012. Summary of the WDPIs Implementation of ESEA Flexibility and Next Steps. This section provides a snapshot of the SEAs progress in implementing each component of ESEA flexibility or unwaived Title I requirements based on the evidence the WDPI described during its monitoring phone call on September 6, 2012, through written documentation provided to the Department, and along with any further clarifications provided by the SEA during its exit conference phone call on September 26, 2012. Where appropriate, this section also includes a set of next steps that were discussed with the SEA during its exit conference phone call, to ensure that the SEA implements the components of ESEA flexibility consistent with the principles and timelines in  HYPERLINK "http://www.ed.gov/esea/flexibility/documents/esea-flexibility.doc" ESEA Flexibility and the WDPIs approved request. Highlights Of the WDPIs Implementation Of Esea Flexibility Based on information provided on the conference call and through written documentation, the WDPIs work implementing ESEA flexibility includes the following highlights: Ongoing communication with LEA administrators to share upcoming activities, solicit input on draft documents, seek feedback as to what stakeholders need, and explain the transition to NAEP-based scores. Dissemination of resources such as sample report cards, technical documents about focus and priority schools, and information about the educator effectiveness system as well as sample letters to parents that explained why schools are being evaluated differently this year compared to prior years, and noting that scores are now based on a NAEP-based scale. Use of staff from regional service agencies and the largest LEAs as accountability trainers as the new accountability system rolls out. The trainers will work in collaboration with WDPI and Wisconsin Response to Intervention (RtI) Center staff to serve as point people for their respective regions and/or LEAs under the new accountability system. Summary Of the WDPIs Progress Implementing ESEA Flexibility And Next Steps Principle 2: State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Component 2.A Develop and implement beginning in the 20122013 school year a system of differentiated recognition, accountability, and support for all LEAs in the State and for all Title I schools in these local education agencies (LEAs). Summary of ProgressThe WDPI indicated that it ran its system of differentiated recognition, accountability, and support based on 20112012 data at the end of August, 2012. According to the WDPI, it identified and corrected a minor issue regarding enrollment differences and this adjustment has been instituted into the technical code. The WDPI indicated that it is currently checking report cards to ensure that there is no incorrect data, and making small adjustments to ensure that the system is working as effectively as possible. During the monitoring call, the WDPI noted that report cards would be released to LEAs on September 24, 2012 and, after a two-week embargo period, would be released publicly the week of October 8, 2012. The Department confirmed that the WDPI released the report cards on October 22, 2012, two weeks later than initially planned to adjust a few calculation issues based on district input as part of the secure release and in response to district requests for additional time to review and build understanding of their data prior to a public release. Next StepsNone. Assurance 7 Report to the public its lists of reward schools, priority schools, and focus schools at the time the SEA is approved to implement flexibility, and annually thereafter, it will publicly recognize its reward schools as well as make public its lists of priority and focus schools if it chooses to update those lists.Summary of ProgressThe WDPI publicly reported its lists of 59 priority schools, and 118 focus schools during the week of July 2, 2012 by posting the lists on its website. See  HYPERLINK "http://priority-schools.dpi.wi.gov/files/priority-schools/pdf/Priority_List.pdf" http://priority-schools.dpi.wi.gov/files/priority-schools/pdf/Priority_List.pdf and  HYPERLINK "http://focus-schools.dpi.wi.gov/files/focus-schools/pdf/focus_school_listing.pdf" http://focus-schools.dpi.wi.gov/files/focus-schools/pdf/focus_school_listing.pdf (valid as of December 18, 2012). The WDPI has not yet publicly reported its list of reward schools. The WDPI indicated that it would present the identity of the reward schools in late September at a cabinet meeting, and would have more detail as to the date of release after that meeting. Next StepsTo ensure that the WDPI publicly reports its list of reward schools consistent with the principles and timelines of ESEA Flexibility: The WDPI stated that it would make the names of its reward schools public in November 2012.  Component 2.DEffect dramatic, systemic change in the lowest-performing schools by publicly identifying priority schools and ensuring that each LEA with one or more of these schools implements, for three years, meaningful interventions aligned with the turnaround principles in each of these schools beginning no later than the 20142015 school year.Summary of ProgressFor the 20122013 school year, the WDPI indicated on the monitoring call that it plans to implement interventions in all 59 of its priority schools. Eighteen of these priority schools are schools receiving School Improvement Grants (SIG) to implement one of four SIG models and 41 of these priority schools are implementing interventions aligned with the turnaround principles. Priority schools that were in SIG cohorts 1 and 2 are continuing to implement the selected SIG model. SIG priority schools are in the process of identifying and engaging with State approved lead turnaround partners (LTPs), one of the WDPIs requirements for all its priority schools outside of Milwaukee Public Schools. The WDPI submitted a copy of the LTP application which notes that LEAs will choose LTPs for non-SIG priority schools by November 15, 2012. The WDPI noted that its non-SIG priority schools plan to implement interventions aligned with the turnaround principles in the 20122013 school year. However, since schools were in the planning stage as of the September 6 monitoring call, WDPI could not provide evidence that these schools were actively implementing all of the turnaround principles. In non-SIG schools, once the schools have identified an LTP, the LTP will provide comprehensive services, including assessing existing conditions with a school level diagnostic review, identifying deficiencies and contributing factors that are inhibiting the schools ability to maintain appropriate levels of student achievement, and making recommendations for school improvement. The LTP will use the review to work with the LEA to create and implement the school reform plan. The mandatory diagnostic review has a component designed to inform job-embedded coaching and provide information that will ensure that there is strong leadership in each school. The WDPI indicated that they expect leadership review will be on-going throughout this school year as LEAs and schools make sure they have the right leadership in place. The WDPI explained that it will ensure that each school implements one of the SIG models or interventions aligned with the turnaround principles by assigning a State liaison to each priority school, as well as using the SIG monitoring process for all priority schools during the 20122013 school year. As of the date of the monitoring call, liaisons were assigned to schools. WDPIs SIG monitoring process includes classroom observation, data review, implementation review, and interviewing focus groups. Next StepsTo ensure that the SEA implements meaningful interventions in its SIG-awarded Tier I and/or Tier II schools, consistent with the SIG final requirements and, therefore, may continue to count such schools as priority schools, consistent with the principles and timelines in ESEA Flexibility: WDPI will work with the Departments Office of School Turnaround to resolve any outstanding monitoring findings relating to the implementation of the SIG models. In order to ensure that implementation of meaningful interventions aligned with all of the turnaround principles takes place in all priority schools for at least three years, the Department will revisit, during Part B monitoring, the status of implementation in non-SIG priority schools and will review evidence and timelines related to this implementation.  Component 2.EWork to close achievement gaps by publicly identifying Title I schools with the greatest achievement gaps, or in which subgroups are furthest behind, as focus schools and ensuring that each LEA implements interventions, which may include tutoring or public school choice, in each of these schools based on reviews of the specific academic needs of the school and its students beginning in the 20122013 school year.Summary of ProgressThe WDPI provided documentation to the Department in advance of the monitoring call that indicated the WDPI requires each focus school to attend a two-day training. Focus schools will take this training on a rolling calendar through the beginning of November 2012. Within two weeks of the completion of the two-day training, focus schools will begin to submit plans to the WDPI through an online planning tool. The WDPI staff will review these plans to ensure that its focus schools will implement interventions that are aligned with the schools reason for identification. The WDPI plans to ensure that schools begin interventions before the end of the first semester by monitoring progress with an online planning tool. Focus schools may receive supports and training from the RtI Center and the WDPI Common Core State Standards Implementation Team. Going forward, the WDPI indicated that it will also provide a State liaison to each focus school, offer assistance through the RtI Center, and require focus schools to conduct a self-assessment on RtI practices. During its exit conference with the Department, the WDPI indicated that it will review consolidated applications, which it receives in early October, to ensure that Title I funds are used to support interventions designed to improve the performance of the lowest-performing students in focus schools. Next StepsNone. Component 2.FProvide incentives and supports to ensure continuous improvement in other Title I schools that, based on the SEAs new AMOs and other measures, are not making progress in improving student achievement and narrowing achievement gaps beginning in the 20122013 school year.Summary of ProgressThe WDPI provided the Department with a redacted list of schools identified by AMOs, and indicated that these schools would be notified on their report cards that they are identified in this category. The WDPI indicated that this notification would be on October 5, 2012. These identified schools will be required to select one or more interventions from a list of State approved menu of interventions. The WDPI will use the consolidated application review process to ensure that LEAs with identified schools have reserved sufficient funds to these schools to implement the intervention(s) selected. The WDPI submitted documentation that listed spotlight schools and provided information about them. These schools are offered as models of good practice and will be available to the other Title I schools for visitation or consultation. The WDPI has specific websites and documents that will assist LEAs and schools to strategically address the needs of English learners and students with disabilities. The WDPI provided information related to its Cooperative Educational Service Agencies (CESAs). CESAs provide free or reduced cost services for all LEAs designed to increase student outcomes and close the achievement gap. For the 20122013 school year, the WDPI provided sample copies of contracts that require CESAs to provide differentiated individualized technical assistance and professional development aligned to the needs of Title I schools failing to meet AMOs. Next StepsNone. Component 2.GBuild SEA, LEA, and school capacity to improve student learning in all schools and, in particular, in low-performing schools and schools with the largest achievement gaps, including through: providing timely and comprehensive monitoring of, and technical assistance for, LEA implementation of interventions in priority and focus schools; holding LEAs accountable for improving school and student performance, particularly for turning around their priority schools; and ensure sufficient support for implementation of interventions in priority schools, focus schools, and other Title I schools identified under the SEAs differentiated recognition, accountability, and support system (including through leveraging funds the LEA was previously required to reserve under ESEA section 1116(b)(10), SIG funds, and other Federal funds, as permitted along with State and local resources).Summary of ProgressThe WDPI indicated during the phone call and provided written information about how it will build the capacity of LEAs and their identified schools to successfully implement reform initiatives with a comprehensive system of support. This system includes WDPI-approved turnaround partners, a WDPI liaison for priority and focus schools, the Wisconsin RtI Center, and both peer-to-peer and RtI Center networking opportunities. The WDPI indicated that it will use the SIG monitoring process to monitor LEAs with priority schools to ensure that schools and LEAs implement planned reforms effectively and with fidelity. For the 20122013 school year, the WDPI provided a copy of the contract that requires CESAs to provide differentiated individualized technical assistance and professional development aligned to the schools failing to meet AMOs. The WDPI indicated that its consultants now have greater access to LEA and school data through the implementation of the new Accountability Index and Report Cards and this information will inform consultants conversations with LEAs regarding areas of identified academic and instructional needs, as well as their subsequent plans for use of ESEA funds to support school and improvements in these areas. The WDPI indicated that it has required its LEAs with priority schools to submit their school reform plan using an online planning tool. The WDPI Title I and School Support team staff will review plans submitted via this tool and communicate with priority schools and their LEAs to provide support. The WDPI submitted documentation that it has identified one LEA, Milwaukee Public Schools, as a District Identified for Improvement. Next StepsNone. Fiscal Use of Funds The SEA ensures that its LEAs use Title I funds consistent with the SEAs approved ESEA flexibility request; Waivers 2, 3, 5, and 9 in the document titled ESEA Flexibility; and any unwaived Title I requirements.Summary of ProgressThe WDPIs revised consolidated application includes guidance to its LEAs on using Title I reservations to provide interventions in priority and focus schools. Next StepsNone. Rank OrderThe SEA ensures that its LEAs with Title I eligible high schools with graduation rates below 60 percent that are identified as priority schools correctly implement the waiver that allows them to serve these schools out of rank order.Summary of ProgressThe WDPI has not identified any Title I-eligible high schools with graduation rates below 60 percent as priority schools and, therefore, it does not have any LEAs that are taking advantage of the waiver to serve these schools out-of-rank order based on poverty rate. Next StepsNone.     SEA: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction ESEA Flexibility Monitoring, Part A Request Submitted: February 28, 2012 Monitoring Review: September 6, 2012 Request Approved: July 6, 2012 Exit Conference: September 26, 2012  PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 10 SEA: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction ESEA Flexibility Monitoring, Part A Request Submitted: February 28, 2012 Monitoring Review: September 6, 2012 Request Approved: July 6, 2012 Exit Conference: September 26, 2012 *+23_`m n  > 56=?K@AXYlzvzh[hhV`hV`>*B*phhV`hV`6>*B*phh-Ejh-EU hV`hV` hWhh6/h56h hvh hvhV`hKhshKhs6]h`+. hKhshKhsh~hW5:B*ph6_ h0h/ i5B* CJaJphI}hWh/ i h~hc86 h~hWh*hh5>*"3_` %:;HIyL & FgdTgdQm & Fgd(P & FgdTgdV`gd & FgdKhsgdKhsgd2$a$gd/ igdTgdhlmn6TVr3FGHI_oxy"#LWb 7@n67ҝݎ h*hhR4h`+.h[4 h*h/ i hFh/ ih/ ih*h/ i6 h/ i6 h"hV` h*hV`hdhV` h6/hh hV`hV`hV`hV`6jh-E6>*B*Uph87Knptuyz{5789R]no*|| h'h/ ihO hsh*h/ i>*h h*h/ i hurhhhurhmE;h/ i hurhmE hurh+?hurhs5:B*CJph6_htrjh-E0J'6UhV h(P0J'6h-Ejh-EU h*h(Ph(P.*;mn{Hsv 12=H~޿޻hVhA'5B*phh*hA'5B*ph h(hA'hurh; B*CJph6_ hurhes hurhmEh8j h+oh+ohHhd|hTh[hh/ i>* h'h/ ihO h@hIh/ i>*h/ i h)mh/ i0n1 $IfgdQ. $$Ifa$gdLgd(gd; gdQm & F^gd> & F^gdT  /!O!Y!t!!!!!!!!""""4#<##$$ $ $$&$+$1$8$J$ % % %%%% %ǸǬ؄y h^oh^oh^ohQ.h^o5B* phI} h(PhA'hhd|hY $If^gd/ i & F$If^gdT %$If^%gd/ i $$Ifa$gdLkd$$Ifl40i$ t0644 laf4pyt8j)))))))(*8*:*;*?*D*X***********+++++,, ,2,6,L,Żtmf_X hHVhzKy hHVh H hHVh/ i hHVhKhshQ.hKX5B*ph6_h*hA'56B*phhKhs5B*phh*hA'5B*ph h/ i56 h056 h*hA'h*hA'56 h @h/ ih6hIh2@&hSqhvh/ i6hYh/ i h*h/ ihQ.hA'5B*ph6_"*******+upnpbbY $IfgdL $$Ifa$gdLgdA'kd$$Ifl40i$ t0644 laf4pyt8j++,--`/355sbbbsY $Ifgd/ i & F$7$8$H$Ifgdf& & F$Ifgdf& $$Ifa$gdLskd4$$Ifl440$u  t6_6_644 laf4p6_6_yt~L,W,[,d,l,,,,,*-,---------......//7/_/`/c/d/n////0(0)0U0^0001)151;1>1G1H111111122=2@2c2ŹűŹũť՞՞՞՞՞՞՞՞ hQTh@ hQTh/ ih]PhIh:hKhsh@hh8hih.9hd|hzKyhh/ i hHVhHVh`+. hHVh.9 hHVh/ i hHVhzKy hHVh]P;c22222223R3U3r3x33344@4A4 55 5+5,585D5c5k5w5y5555555556s6u67(7)7*7.7/777Ϳ隐 h0<]h0<h0<]h0<h0<h0<6] h0<h0<hQ.h5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'56hNh/ i56B*ph6_hh&`hf2hhKhshh:h+\nh'h@h/ i hQTh/ i.556*773949y $Ifgd^o ) & F$Ifgd0< ) & F$Ifgd0< $$Ifa$gdWkd$$Ifl40$u t644 laf4yt8j7e8m8n8993949596989999999:::::::;;;Q;U;`;d;q;r;;;;tpipepepap]YpehJh&h Hhs5A h'h/ ih/ ihQ.hA'5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'56B*phhKhs5B*phhD25B*phh*hA'5B*phh*hA'56 h0<56 hA'56 h1h h1h(P h(P]h^h(PB* ]phI}h5Zh(P]h^h(P]"4959698999D9H9: $IfgdL $$Ifa$gdLgdA'Wkd:$$Ifl40$u t644 laf4yt:::=U>)?X@eYL??? & F $Ifgd:  & F $Ifgdkw $$Ifa$gdLkd$$Ifl440$u  t6_6_0644 laf4p6_6_ytQ.;;<<<<<<==<=P===>S>U>>>)?X@Y@Z@e@j@l@o@p@]A}AAAAA˿ugZhQ.hA'5B*ph6_h*hA'56B*phhKhs5B*phh*hA'5B*ph hA'56 h0<56 h^oh^ohQ.h^o5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'56h^oh[>9hZ35hZ3h\V hkwhe h(jhehehe6CJaJheheCJaJh he!X@Y@Z@e@k@vja $IfgdQ. $$Ifa$gd^okde$$Ifl440$u t0644 laf4ytQ. $IfgdjC6k@l@m@o@p@{@@AtomoaaX $IfgdL $$Ifa$gdLgdA'kd$$Ifl440$u t0644 laf4pytQ.AAAB9CCDeYH777 & F }$If^}gdf& & F }$If^}gd/( $$Ifa$gdLkd$$Ifl440$u    tI}I}0644 laf4pI}I}yt8jAAAABB8C9CCCD D%D,D@D_DeEvEEEEEEEbFFFFFFFF:GGGOGlGmGnGoGzGGG¹ʎzvo h^oh^oh^ohQ.h^o5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'56 hdM^J h9mF^J ht^J hKhs^Jh/ ih/ i^Jhth/ i^Jhth/ i\h/ ih/ i\ h*q\hh/ i\h;h/ i6\hfh/ i6\ h/ i\h9mFh/ i)DEmGnGoGzGG[OF $IfgdQ. $$Ifa$gd^okdg$$Ifl40$u t0644 laf4pyt8j $Ifgd/ i & F }$If^}gdf&GGGGGGGGSHuppppdd[ $IfgdL $$Ifa$gdLgdA'kd $$Ifl40$u t0644 laf4pyt^oGGGGQHRHKKKKKK.K:K@KDKKL@LALLLkLLLLLLLLLL MM,MGMLMMMMiNjNOOۿ~vmhh0^Jhh0\ hKhs^J hTT{^J hdM^J h0^J h9mF^J h^Jh#h0^JhQ.hA'5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'5hA'5B*phhD25B*phh*hA'5B*phh*h056 h056 hA'56*SHHjIKKKL[O: & F $7$8$H$If^gdf& $$Ifa$gdLkd $$Ifl40$y  t6_6_0644 lap6_6_yt~ & F$IfgdTLMjNO*QQQ $If^gd0 & F$If^gdf& & F $If^gdf& & F $7$8$H$If^gdf&OnPPPPPPPQ)Q*QQQQQQQQQQuRRRRRRRR S SSaSbSž{{njf_f_j[h(P h*h0hh]h0hQ.hA'5B*ph6_hLhA'56B*phhLhA'5B*ph h~hA'h8j h^oh^oh^oh^o^JhQ.h^o5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'56hh0\ h0\ h)^Jhh*q^J h0^J h*q^Jhh0^J QQQQxl^ $7$8$H$IfgdQ. $$Ifa$gd^okd $$Ifl0$y t0644 lapytA'QQQQRxsg^ $IfgdL $$Ifa$gdLgd(kd" $$Ifl0$y t0644 lapyt^oRRRcSdSof $Ifgd0 & F $If^gdf& $$Ifa$gdLskd $$Ifl440\$  t6_6_644 laf4p6_6_yt~bScSdSeSpSuSwSxSyS?TCTmTnToTTTTTTTU U U UU.UhUiUkUlU|UUUUUUǽ拄|||xndh*h56hhA'56h@hR4h0 h*h0hQ.hA'5B*ph6_h*hA'56B*phhA'5B*phh*hA'5B*phh*h056 hA'56 h^oh^oh^ohQ.h^o5B*ph6_ h*hA'h*hA'56hJh05#dSeSpSvSwS-dkd $$Ifl440\$ t644 laf4pyt^o $IfgdQ. $$Ifa$gd^oXkdz $$Ifl440\$ t644 laf4yt8jwSxSySSnToTTKkdk $$Ifl440\$  t6_6_0644 laf4p6_6_yt~ $IfgdL $$Ifa$gdLgdA'TUUUUUWKB $IfgdQ. $$Ifa$gdLkd2$$Ifl40\$ t0644 laf4pyt8j $If^gd & F$If^gdf&UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUVV'V(V9VDVVVhViVzV{VVVŽxococSochRhR456B*aJph6_hR45B*aJph6_hu&hR4aJhhR45aJh|hR45B*aJph6_ hR4aJhR4B*aJph6_hhR45B*aJph6_hcGhR4aJh-Ejh-EU h*hesh*h'6h*hU56h*hA'56 h*h>h>hQ.h>5B*ph6_ UUUUUUUUUUUupg^\\\\\\^gd$h^hgdV:gdukd$$Ifl40\$ t0644 laf4pyt8j UUUUUUUViVVVVVVV=WWWWWWW^gd$$a$gd9]$a$gdgdVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVWWW6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH H`H KXNormal CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH H@H ! Heading 1@&a$5:B*CJph6_F@F "Qm Heading 2@&5:B*CJph6_B@B #( Heading 3@&5:B*ph6_8@8 $c86 Heading 4@&5>*F@F %Qm Heading 5 @&^56B*ph6_P@P &c86 Heading 6 <@&5CJOJQJ\aJDA D Default Paragraph FontRi@R 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List j j VYN Table Grid7:V06@6 VYN Footnote Text@&`@ VYNFootnote ReferenceH*>'`!> VYN0Comment ReferenceCJ4@24 VYN0 Comment Text:j12: VYNComment SubjectD@RD VYN Balloon TextCJOJQJaJ4+b4 y Endnote Text>*`q> yEndnote ReferenceH*4@4 9]0Header H$6o6 9]0 Header CharCJaJ4 @4 9]0Footer H$6o6 9]0 Footer CharCJaJBoB 56i0Comment Text CharCJaJRR V: Medium Grid 1 - Accent 21^fofV:0Medium List 2 - Accent 21CJ_HaJmH sH tH RR 1 Colorful List - Accent 11^lol10Colorful Shading - Accent 11 CJ_HaJmH sH tH ToT Heading 1 Char5:B*CJOJQJaJph6_To!T QmHeading 2 Char5:B*CJOJQJaJph6_To1T (Heading 3 Char5:B*CJOJQJaJph6_JoAJ c86Heading 4 Char5>*CJOJQJaJToQT QmHeading 5 Char56B*CJOJQJaJph6_RoaR c86Heading 6 Char5CJOJPJQJ\^JaJ6U`q6 Y0 Hyperlink >*B*phL`LJ0Revision( CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH @@@ (P List Paragraph )^m$FV`F HV0FollowedHyperlink >*B*phPK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3N)cbJ uV4(Tn 7_?m-ٛ{UBwznʜ"Z xJZp; {/<P;,)''KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd̛\17 pa>SR! 3K4'+rzQ TTIIvt]Kc⫲K#v5+|D~O@%\w_nN[L9KqgVhn R!y+Un;*&/HrT >>\ t=.Tġ S; Z~!P9giCڧ!# B,;X=ۻ,I2UWV9$lk=Aj;{AP79|s*Y;̠[MCۿhf]o{oY=1kyVV5E8Vk+֜\80X4D)!!?*|fv u"xA@T_q64)kڬuV7 t '%;i9s9x,ڎ-45xd8?ǘd/Y|t &LILJ`& -Gt/PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0C)theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] O  8AADl7* %)L,c27;AGObSUVWW,./0269<=?BFILPTWX %%k&)*+549:X@k@ADGSHLQQRdSwSTUUW-134578:;>@ACDEGHJKMNOQRSUV @ l 8{0 OXXXX14D!T # @H 0(  0(  B S  ?MMMMMMMMMMMMMOO=D* + MMNNO333MMNNORxF&$z 6W"3[W>;u<*t,.2[ h/&Jk/:0 ?d:ZN=|'v>|hBtH&IbI} QSZ]ފ~aG1hv]kp+esJ{(v| h^h`OJQJo(8^8`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o x^x`OJQJo( H^H`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o  ^ `OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo(x^x`OJQJ^Jo(o H^H`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`B*OJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo( f^f`OJQJo(6^6`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o v ^v `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`B*OJQJo(ph ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o U ^U `OJQJo( %^%`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(e^e`OJQJ^Jo(o 5^5`OJQJo(^`5B*OJQJo(ph^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo(\ ^\ `OJQJ^Jo(o ,^,`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo(8^8`B*OJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o x^x`OJQJo( H^H`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`B*OJQJo(ph^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`B*OJQJo(php^p`OJQJ^Jo(o @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(P^P`OJQJ^Jo(o  ^ `OJQJo(^`B*CJOJQJaJo(ph^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo(8^8`B*OJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o x^x`OJQJo( H^H`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(oz ^z `OJQJ^Jo(o J^J`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(Z^Z`OJQJ^Jo(o *^*`OJQJo( v^v`OJQJo(F^F`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( V^V`OJQJo(&^&`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo(|^|`B*OJQJo(phL^L`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o  ^ `OJQJo( \^\`OJQJo(,^,`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo("3]k*t,BtH1h~aJk/+esJ{v|} QZ]?d:&IN=z 'v>R h/                   PPf\                xT                           &                BM                                   xT        xT        Q.                                           xT         F +-6$\3d|DP9&d ; /( 8 `V?Ns9F QK+`n}*_bsjX7 ^|5~98jX08~)/c!{",ymJA K *!|Q#dz#B%2@&''0'<'r' (c`()0X,.`+.o.s.1/6/101;1Td1|12.A2$e2oz244R4[4J545kX5c86jC6,C7e+8k8k86q8[>9C9O|99V:I;0<!r= >,?+?@bAs5ABA6C KUs}J $UTAAJO A1*b @5b$l!6jCCv%A'FkwYa27*D_HIS| 7OTjdp.~]N1et}9W&ihZ+W5FRes>kL/r.fh5Fa$3m(`>c[=yp!8!)@.TSsyN)qs )*XId--6C+h]H]iF;hG\qdM~?BZG^ Ky Rf29?mEP 6{uwR Ha9~O"H+lrG[dfx@#*K>XswR++ov'f&:$T]@(i5]PbY -K_^V`D6=(n'0Z80.X ~ MM@O@Unknown G*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial9Garamond7.{ @CalibriOPLucida GrandeArial?= *Cx Courier New;WingdingsACambria Math" h[' B ' B '!0MMJIP $D2xxB6 "Wisconsin Monitoring Report Part AU.S. Department of EducationAuthorised User`                Oh+'0P  8 D P \hpx$Wisconsin Monitoring Report Part A U.S. Department of EducationNormalAuthorised User2Microsoft Office Word@F#@fБ@^I@^I  BGOVT$m4 s'   !1.@Garamond------@Garamond------------ 2 >`0 SEA: d --- 6_J2 >*0 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction         --- 6_ 2 >0   2 > 0  --- 6_@2 >#0 ESEA Flexibility Monitoring, Part A          2 >0   @Garamond--------- &2 P`0 Request Submitted:    2 P0  --- 6_%2 P0 February 28, 2012:   ---  2 PZ0  &  2 P0  0 2 P 0   &2 P0 Monitoring Review:   --- 6_ 2 PR0   6_%2 PU0 September 6, 2012:  --- 6_ 2 P0   --- %2 b`0 Request Approved::    2 b0  --- 6_2 b 0 July 6, 2012 ---  2 b+0  %  2 bP0  0 2 b0  d  2 b0   2 b 0   #2 b0 Exit Conference:  --- 6_ 2 bJ0   6_&2 bN0 September 26, 2012  ---  2 b0     2 t`0    0'---  2 `0   @Garamond------@Garamond------ @Garamond-------------------------------------- 6_2 0 ESEA --- 6_ 2 0  --- 6_2 0 FLEXIBILITY    --- 6_ 2 10  --- 6_2 50 PART --- 6_ 2 g0  --- 6_ 2 k0 A --- 6_ 2 w0  --- 6_2 { 0 MONITORING  --- 6_ 2 0  --- 6_2 0 REPORT  --- 6_ 2 U0  --- 6_2 Y0 FORO  --- 6_ 2 0  --- 6_2 0 THEO   6_ 2 0    I}L2 +0 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION             I} 2 0   --- 6_ 2 `0   --- 2 `O0 The U.S. Department of Education (Department) is committed to supporting State         2 h 0 educational   2 `W0 agencies (SEAs) as they implement ambitious reform agendas through their approved ESEA          2 `b0 flexibility requests. Consistent with this commitment, the Department has developed a monitoring          d2 `;0 process that is designed to both ensure that each SEA imple   M2 ,0 ments its plan fully, effectively, and in a   2 `f0 manner that is consistent with its approved request and the requirements of ESEA flexibility, as well        2 .`f0 as support each SEA with technical assistance to help ensure its implementation increases the quality       2 @`0 of instr 2 @T0 uction and improves student achievement for all students in the State and its local     2 R`a0 educational agencies (LEAs). Through this process, the Department aims to productively interact l       |2 d`K0 with SEAs and shift from a focus primarily on compliance to one focused on a      2 dB 0 outcomes.a   2 d0     2 v`0    2 ` 0 For the 2012   2 0  2 U0 2013 school year, the Department has divided its ESEA flexibility monitoring process A       k2 `@0 into three components, which are designed to align with the real     2 0 - =2 !0 time implementation occurring at      U2 `10 the SEA, LEA, and school levels and be differenti   O2 -0 ated based on an SEAs progress and depth of    2 `0 work: r   2 0   @Symbol------@"Arial---------  2 x0 ---  2 0  --- 2 S0 Part A provided the Department with a deeper understanding of each SEAs goals and s        \2 60 approaches to implementing ESEA flexibility and ensure      2 0 d  2 0   #2 0 that each SEA ha   2 h0 d  2 p0   2 t 0 the critical   =2 !0 elements of ESEA flexibility in p    Y2 ]40 lace to begin implementation of its plan in the 2012    2 0  2 0 2013   d2 ;0 school year. Part A was conducted through desk monitoring.      2  0   ---  2 x0 ---  2 0  --- 2 T0 Parts B and C, which are under development, will include a broader look at an SEAs         \2 /60 implementation of ESEA flexibility across all three pr     D2 /&0 inciples, including its transition to   2 A0 colleger  2 A0 -  2 A0   2 A 0 and career  2 A0 - y2 A I0 ready standards, its process for developing and implementing teacher and     Y2 S40 principal evaluation and support systems, and follow    2 S0 - A2 S$0 up monitoring on the implementation      A2 e$0 of interventions in priority and foc ^2 eg70 us schools. Parts B and C reviews also will include a        2 wW0 closer examination of the use of annual measureable objectives (AMOs), graduation rate      2 V0 targets, and other measures to drive supports and incentives in other Title I schools.    2 0    2 0   2 0 In l  .2 0 addition, Parts B and C     2  0   s2 $E0 monitoring will address select unwaived Title I requirements and any       @Garamond--------- :2 0 next steps identified in the --- J2 F*0 ESEA Flexibility Part A Monitoring Report.       --- 2 E0   ,2 L0 These reviews will be     C2 %0 conducted through a combination of on    2 0 - R2 /0 site monitoring, desk monitoring, and progress     2 0 chec 2 X0 ks that will be differentiated based on an individual SEAs circumstances and request.      V2 20 The format of future reports may vary from Part A.        2 0     2 `0    2 ``0 The Department will support each SEA in its implementation of ESEA flexibility across all three           )2 `0 monitoring component   y2 I0 s and will work with each SEA to identify areas for additional technical       2 +` 0 assistance.  2 +0    2 +0    2 +0     2 =`0   ------ 2 O`0 This g --- I2 O)0 ESEA Flexibility Part A Monitoring Report          ---  2 O0   2 O0 provider 2 O0 s  2 O 0 feedback to   2 O-0 the Wisconsin   G2 a`(0 Department of Public Instruction (WDPI)     ;2 ak 0 on its progress in implementing     2 a30 the components   2 a0   2 a0 of v --- #2 s`0 ESEA flexibility    2 s0   &2 s0 identified in the  #2 s/0 document titled  --- .2 s0 ESEA Flexibility Part A     ---  2 s'0  --- (2 s*0 Monitoring Protocolr    2 s0  --- 2 s0 to v@Garamond- - - - - - @Garamond- - - - - - - @ !t-   --- 2 `b0 ensure the SEA implements ESEA flexibility fully, effectively, and in a manner that is consistent         |2 `K0 with the SEAs approved request and the requirements of ESEA flexibility.      /2 ;0 This report is based on   82 `0 information provided through S  2 '0 EA   2 =0 - .2 B0 submitted documentation   2 0 , a  :2 0 monitoring call conducted with   "SystemuXd.@\ u`u@- -   00//..՜.+,D՜.+, hp  F U.S. Department of Education'M #Wisconsin Monitoring Report Part A2ESEA FLEXIBILITY PART A MONITORING REPORT FOR THE@ Highlights Of the WDPIs Implementation Of Esea FlexibilityQ Summary Of the WDPIs Progress Implementing ESEA Flexibility And Next Steps Y Principle 2: State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Sup Fiscal Title Headings(V^ _PID_HLINKSContentTypeIdA4,| Qhttp://focus-schools.dpi.wi.gov/files/focus-schools/pdf/focus_school_listing.pdffPhttp://priority-schools.dpi.wi.gov/files/priority-schools/pdf/Priority_List.pdf TBhttp://www.ed.gov/esea/flexibility/documents/esea-flexibility.docg:Lhttp://www.ed.gov/esea/flexibility/documents/monitoring-part-a-protocol.doc,0x0101008CD70F042940BF42BB8BAD00C7690455  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY[\]^_`acdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~ Root Entry F@PBData Z1TablebcWordDocumentU7SummaryInformation(PDocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStoreP، OUCKZA==27P،0NItem  PropertiesUCR2EOFBOXS1Q==2% P،Item  PropertiesUCGOUUOYJLBJ==2P،"Item PropertiesUQYCDAXK0K==21=P،qItem Properties"OOU5FWNOEWVG0BTRSA==2 (P،Item (Properties,UJDOZSEFCIA==2P،00Item 2Properties6U4JY3VNRXMA==2: P،`Item <Properties@UXFVTNU4PK0IVL==2FP،Item FPropertiesJUQG3IYGQ==24 P،Item !PPropertiesTUSTC2UOBPRBA==2#P،SItem $ZProperties^UI1JXKNH5V0X==2+.&P،0Item 'dPropertieshUTWMKGCLZN==2)P،`Item *nPropertiesrUGD1LEZMGGGOZ==2O,P،Item -xProperties|UJFTWIK5YWH1A==2R/P، Item 0PropertiesUVQR4N350==22P،@9Item 3PropertiesUQIOA41US4QMUXBQ==25P،pItem 6PropertiesUDJEKY1SMDQ==2"C8`;،Item 9PropertiesU0E0NEOTL04AT==2@;`;،0Item <PropertiesUTTQLEMZ2Q==2>`;،aItem ?PropertiesU0GIJDH05R==2A`;،Item B-Properties001AXURMON35==2D`;،Item EPropertiesUSW3CDV0A==2G`;،\Item HPropertiesUL4ONMUQE24VK03A==2J`;،Item KPropertiesUKFBU0SJKQ==2M`;،Item NPropertiesUF2D3341PY3SKA==2P`;،>Item QPropertiesUK2VYY3P3PWDI==2LIS`;، Item TPropertiesUCompObj r  !#$%&')*+-./01345789:;=>?ABCDEGHIKLMNOQRSUVWXY[\]_`abcefgijklmopqstuvwyz{}~ DocumentLibraryFormDocumentLibraryFormDocumentLibraryForm This value indicates the number of saves or revisions. The application is responsible for updating this value after each revision. ns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml">   F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q