ࡱ> LOK[ bjbj 8*ΐΐO``8$$ C77777BBBBBBBDYGBB77BX77BB>:B7@7-j|?"BB0 C @GGD:BG:B`BB  CG` i: Ericsson, The Ways We Lie Structural Notes Introduction / Context The first six paragraphs establish the occasion for this essay. Within the first six paragraphs, Ericsson grounds the exercise in her personal life and introduces a kind of calling: the need for this classification and division. She establishes her tone, which is almost sheepish: a self-conscious grappling with her own culpability in this kind of ubiquitous duplicity. Category #1 Category #10 In 2-4 paragraphs, she provides general descriptions and specific examples of each type of lie. For each, she manages to include fascinating and engaging details: the story of Lilith, the Clarence Thomas trial, anecdotes about her kids, and so on. In each, she manipulates syntax and diction to produce an air of authoritynot a scholarly tone, but the voice of a woman who has carefully reasoned these categories out. Conclusion The final three paragraphs provide a reflective commentary on the preceding categorical exploration. Ericsson uses more quotations to ground us in the necessity and applicability of her essay. The final paragraph ties itself back to the opening, providing a necessary framework for the focused but circuitous compartmentalizing that precedes it. Epigraphs One rhetorical strategy here is use of the epigraphs before every section but the introduction. Epigraphs provide a critical component to an essay like this. They add a dimension to the classifications, and they connect the examples with a larger world (of literature, life, etc). Rhetorical Analysis: Part 1 SOAPSTONE What is the subject of this essay? What is the immediate occasion, as described in the text? What is the more general occasion? Who is the audience here? Identify direct addresses or inclusive language. What are a few of Ericssons purposes? Is this an argument of fact, value, policy, or some combination of the three? To what extent do you see her articulate an explicit thesis? Describe the speaker of this piece. Ericsson, The Ways We Lie Rhetorical Analysis: Part 2 Introduction How many engaging details does Ericsson pack into the first paragraph? What are they? Analyze the movement from the first sentence of paragraph 1(about the bank lie) into the first sentence of paragraph 3. How does Ericsson avoid making the callback in paragraph 4 the return to her initial series of examples sound repetitious? What is the nature of the rhetorical questions in paragraphs 5 and 6? I.e., how does the rest of the essay seem to answer these questions? To what extent is the use of Websters definition an effective appeal to ethos? The White Lie Explain the epigraphs meaning. Analyze the irony in the statement. What is the dimension added by the epigraph? How does the example in paragraph 2 demonstrate the idea of notso cut-and-dried? Facades What is the allusion in the epigraph? What dimension does it add to this categorical exploration? Do we all wear facades, or is this a hasty generalization? What is the dichotomy set up here between Ericsson in her pajamas and the former friend of paragraph 2? What is the emerging argument about lyingthe argument of valuethat is sounded again with the destructive complaint in paragraph 2? Hint: It starts with paragraph 5 in the introduction. Hint: It is implied in the unable to move on to a new life in paragraph 2 of The White Lie. Explain the stylistic strength of the last sentence of paragraph 2. Ignoring the Plain Facts What does Ericsson intend this epigraph to add to the subsequent discussion? What is the appeal to pathos in paragraph 1? Where does Ericsson allude back to the definitions from Websters? To what effect? What other kind of ignoring the facts (other than the deliberate deception exemplified by the church) is Ericsson suggesting? Deflecting What is the technical term for the logical fallacy stated in the epigraph? [Define ad hominem.] How is this an example of an ad hominem? What dimension does it add to Ericssons explanation? There are three subtypes of deflection. What is the first? What does the Clarence Thomas example illustrate? What is the fighting technique described in paragraph 3? What does Ericsson imply about disputes between men and women here?     EMULATION: CLASSIFICATION AND DIVISION LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION ./F  y   2 4 7 A d  w }}}}}}}}}nnhk.hCJOJQJaJhPCJOJQJaJh <CJOJQJaJhPh6CJOJQJaJh*pCJOJQJaJhohCJOJQJaJhoh5CJOJQJaJh 5CJOJQJaJh <>*OJQJhuh <CJOJQJaJhuh <OJQJ'./F+ 4 w C  & Fdgd & Fdgd & Fdgd & Fdgd dgd $da$gd        ! E F )ⸯtehuh CJOJQJaJhuh OJQJh OJQJh*OJQJhohCJOJQJaJhk.CJOJQJaJhk.h*pCJOJQJaJhk.hCJOJQJaJhk.hPCJOJQJaJ%)Likd@Nn $da$gd & Fdgd & Fdgd dgd kr !OW@Nnu}1P`ef2?ȭhoh6CJOJQJaJhoh3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] * 44NNNQ  %8@0(  B S  ?_f333/FF++wwEFkr > > ? ? @ n u   O P e f \l/FF++wwEFkr > > ? ? n u O P e f 4S ʙ[2,<],q02f:$%U B0F:bGgMO$`rS*:&U`d Noth^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH?@ABDEFGHIJMNQRoot Entry F0-P1Table%HWordDocument 8*SummaryInformation(;DocumentSummaryInformation8CMsoDataStore -@7-Z3UKCWQ35==2 -@7-Item PropertiesUCompObj y   F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q