ࡱ> GIF'` bjbj{P{P .(:: jjj8K=&<<<<<<<$q>h@<<<2   R< <    jR <=<K= AfRA A %v/T D<<RK= d  TAKE ACTION: Proposed Rule to Protect Social Security Funds in Bank Accounts from Garnishment Dear Federal Benefits Recipient, We ask that you take a minute to speak out in favor of a proposed rule that would stop creditors from illegally garnishing bank accounts that contain Social Security, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and Veterans benefits. If you receive these benefits, you know this money is essential to you. It helps you pay for food, housing, and other basic living expenses. Federal law already prevents creditors from taking these benefits for debts you owe them. But banks often seize these benefits from a bank account and pay them over to creditors anyway. This is known as garnishment. The rule proposed by the U.S. Treasury Department would stop this from happening. The rule will require all banks to protect all federal benefits (Social Security, SSI, Veterans benefits, etc.) in bank accounts. Banks will NOT be allowed to turn these benefits over to creditors. Under the proposed rule, once a bank receives a court order saying seize all the funds in this customers bank account the bank will be required to take several steps. First the bank will look at the account and see if any federal benefits have been electronically deposited in the last 60 days. This is called the look-back period. Second, if any of these benefits have been deposited, the bank must protect that money for you. All of these benefits must be protected, even if you deposited some money from other sources and even if you withdrew some of the money. Also, banks will not be allowed to take garnishment fees from the protected benefits. The proposed rule will be a big help to the millions of Americans who depend on federal benefits to get by. But the rule needs to be improved. The look-back period should be increased from 60 to 65 days to make sure that two full months of benefits are protected. We expect that debt collectors and some banks will try to block this proposed rule. Please support the proposed rule by telling the Treasury Department why the proposed rule is important and why it needs to be finalized. You can write your own letter or use all or some of the sample letter provided. Please do not include private information like your Social Security Number or bank account number in your letter. Letters received by the government are available to the public. Comments must be received by the Treasury Department on or before June 18, 2010. Please send your letter today! Sample Letter To: Department of the Treasury, Social Security Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, Railroad Retirement Board, and Office of Personnel Management Re: Please Put In Place Proposed Rule on Garnishment of Bank Accounts Containing Federal Benefit Payments RIN Nos. 3206-AM17, 3220-AB63, 0960-AH18, 1505-AC20 & 2900- AN67 Date: [Insert date here] Dear Sirs and Madams, I support the Proposed Rule on Garnishment of Bank Accounts. My federal benefits are direct deposited into my bank account. I had problems when a creditor got a court order to garnish my bank account, and the bank froze my account. [Describe what happened to you here. For example: I wasnt able to use my money to pay my rent, so I was evicted. You could also say: I have been worried about what would happen to me if a creditor got a court order to garnish my bank account and the account was frozen, then explain why you are worried.] Like me, many people need their federal benefits to pay for basic living expenses such as shelter, food, and medical bills. Treasurys proposal to establish a protected amount that banks could not freeze is essential for me to feel safe using a bank account and having my benefits direct deposited into it. To make sure we have enough to live on if our bank accounts are garnished, the protected amount needs to cover a full two months worth of benefits. One month will not be enough to live on, and we would be in danger of falling behind in rent, going hungry, or not having our medications. So I am asking the agencies to extend the look-back period in the Rule from sixty to sixty-five days. Thank you for your proposal of this important Rule. Sincerely, [Sign your name here] [Print your name here] **** Please mail your letter to Gary Grippo, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Fiscal Operations and Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 2112, Washington, D.C. 20220 OR upload it on-line at http://www.regulations.gov.     ` K Q Y - c O m ->moK׿׿׷׫׷׷׷׷׷׷׷}qhP?h >*OJQJhP?h 5OJQJ\h\v~h OJQJ\h 5OJQJ\h OJQJ\hP?h OJQJ\h OJQJhP?h 5OJQJhP?h 6OJQJhP?h OJQJh 5CJOJQJaJh|w"h 5CJOJQJaJ,_`d e tuFEƀbfgd gd $a$gd KUtu')yμγwswswswsh ,jh ,Uhh hV%-OJQJh0*OJQJhnmh 5CJOJQJaJhP?h >*OJQJh >*OJQJ"hh 5>*CJOJQJaJhh >*CJOJQJaJhh CJOJQJaJhP?h OJQJh OJQJ& MNlmmn$a$gd gd gd ,1h/ =!"#$% @@@  NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DAD Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No ListHH 0* Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ(_`det u M N l m mn0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000006^00h6^006^006^ 00_`det u M N l m mn00000 00 000#0 000#0 000 00000000000000000000000000000$0 0$0 %0$0 0$00!00!00!00!00!00!0000000@0@00&00&00&0'j0&00&0@0@00000000000\6 K8@0(  B S  ?; D  7  T  < S[||Y_9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState:*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet>*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PostalCode;*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddress9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCityB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region d; ` _ J =3KAvCCDI&O\hmnUv8 /IVbcl [4""&*//uBOQ]`g y#~O/?fjpz7}J$R8Yqz;Fmosvdz"9J:=*ux0249;?ENX`d2ffuT}&b1aOV#Zmxno  * 0 L P    & ,- 0 SQ Z Bw x H g 8/ 4C I M W Ta Bs {  ' 2( p, 0 5 H V [ z { %   z M" ; _ it x | ]11GL`WWtf{& )1;fPYWBLbi }\%\&6-0P_jL#+I=NR^}f#.{i/%Y` klvxx ##9Ht\ zz j#;1(33`PWkfOb+2ci.=XY@cj. -9YX[w X?-QWi_t_yy/)1HFRam}\!oAa,q_  > %45<DINYZmD32::NNU&VZeqy=!#*?KWHb EA-2kZ%[s '! l& Y5 ? ]D ^E y 0!!!P!?!nK!h!Rm!"q"&"-"."|9"%C"X"h"j"# #0j#5s#= $$R$$#$7$|$%% '%k%&&&&&2&3&I&'')'z'"(Q(+o(Ru(z( )))-)0)G)S)t)z *m *x(*{0*u4*\*a*m*is*x*x*z*.++++c+m+s+e{+}+,=,DG,T,U,eX,Y,x,,9-T ---R-q--w---$-V%-&4-. . .4.nI.O.%h.l. y.ty.|.=//4/9R9!^9h9:::i+:.:J;:K:h`:p:|:I;0; ;A!;6;AT;`;ul;{<< <0<V3<cC<zE<uL<L<Y[<o<==%=l4=1G=G=|]=Gd=q=n>E>EF>}Y>|>? ?-?)1?HN?n?u?Z}?7~?_@ @%#@#$@.@4@8@O@T@1k@Es@v@ A&AHA$JAFPAeTA0pAsA ~ABfBBpWBaBpBuB C8C83C;CCWCMYCjCpCuCwCDKD*D3D=DADdDnDytDc+E/Eo9E>JETEXE1eEjElEZnEsFf'FGFXLFMF0`F}bFipF GGGG-G@CG#PGwGm HBHCHJH.gHsHX~H3IIg0I4ISLI`IbIjrIuIJ=J% J>Jt@J AJyCJGJIJ'RJ{J K KAK-GKNKQK~XK`KiKLHBLPQLWSLoSLXL`LdLMQMM)M,M2M pMtMvMtNNN3N9RN`N:cNKnNqNrNWsNNO O1OQO`YOjOwOO9P P PP&P P7P3SPS\SkS2}SQ TTcT]$T;T&FT{YTaTrfT zT}TU"U!aU*wUV V VV*@V.FV=FVKVdTVYVfV!yV{VV?WXUX]X|*Y+YK5Yu8YDYQYsY|Y ZZZ Z;ZPZUZU\Z'[> [[e[8[9[Q[T[Y[d[]x[\n(\B7\>\@\aM\R\\\g\h\s\Ow\Qz\ ]i]q].]Q]x]z]+|]4^^ ^p ^^RG^[^{^p~^_*_38_yA_B_S_/Z_gi_|_92`]S`Z`o`w`x`aa5a =a">a@aOvasza{ab.b[b7 b bb$b*bM.b;b?bCFb ^b}bvcccQ c c\c5cuDc"RcAdd_d?d?JdJduNdNdhee5eHeY*e_ReZe{ee|e9fzff3fAfCfFflXfYf^f$cfgfgg$3g`g`ghQh!h"h>h+Gh]hghqhiiiki#i~7iDiKiOiZidiliDjj(6j;j}@j FjXjaj2fjjkk%k'k/kF5k"HkNkgkQqk&l3l*0ly5l5l;lAlBloBo [odo!p pp"ps8pPp^pSbpephgpDqqh#q$qW.q2qMqOqoq)vqjwq zqrd0rWErkrtzrss] s ,s=sCs6DscJsCNs tttt/t4tEtQFtVhtqtuuuu\uueLtX^}bkltxz}' <+k019CRachswF3 7=ySU`kk|!+CEHZb eo~l%erDx8 `!T)a1;6cAAbGIb}5 6v #W'+lnnCd!4O>3Uvd ekju "n-0Denp (/0 :Q!Ui/'50?BC+nz &/2p558nDM]fmn m f9;KP1a/f0hnQDIbJMN[C|L"M%|04:VWYli}E4 Sfm *'h(h+5i@@6G__|cm +L$|2[oq*+0pa,g{,<FN9Ratc3 $b%Q,FKLegt ^,,7<FOWb \)K?u?$@;@`LMPgS =CwEOy_{cdkl:CMaGu@vw/%C,?MMhlppL4  d()>AxFMSU[qouWw(r4;,NZwZ{$q6JLFZani  /p7A/CC!E IQQ$T=Tuy~  g Wh)d22Z[ekl --8yUj{i.FnN^"ac3ovk %7FFQirv # '37>yLRZ!()17Pv qb'5OXYpx!#,LNSVbcg np rt  5#.CIP  41;HXfu~8U"W\a_`dsk"#X$RT n_!-B@GOVcY[Hcg `:s<XY\(][]xW}=Fu%((@)/6d:r:hASYabnz(-,2B4LLoTwYpzfHI\LOYSa#ikxE,=]jz45GAZCZrk{i GQVXls"|$ !1)7PMX^Jbbb9rz's),>?_1!%.PS4et4Af`kp-y> m4O6%:>O)U6*:.>CVOm)v) #|-h3?Vfop>)BB[v 13>Jk4uYoC@BF\H4#2C6)Iar @x'336G|~KF0Gn]7a}~~4c!6!=M Wm4Pi;;|Oh[n~ DHMVa`f?@AwEUhWw<#[>8:vN{,+,Y4:YZgtsV%2);=^@LTW5-FRb4fDi./Db|q**1.1>??*e'fjmznTr4{ &,#$48cgp|}& ~(;[F`gmxzf|& ,3a<AiDjyX UZ u<gjr| ux-+Of"}+$&H0p>wllt _W)6zMS,^iWXoPP5_5VPd!$5@fB}L^bjiwp|S~ Q"$'h5R) o001lprs{o!#.E0GlHT4`eao'(+E"IWz`lCxAh)3_~ ,2[rn _ 7HGL^`d 2'77?GMK_bi=jl}~f7BG7L`Y[]jKv_$Z1hHS%Wz Feeu!@vF])x{ #03c4O56^:LB+R`~"M26Q7u8eQmWZZ}^h`%%O(0*sFKZcs-"&h0VmDp (q(-3::BC%H[xyzJ|Y}!\,METI[*\4r +09AEcIN@qsdu:z*s11h58>BMROeJkT/4FKop~1{ #lEOW~_Emw (-a/g44Dhn+[3; HgYl"wl^3>?BLys4t M'<DUYlYq- 1M2IQZqemkqs}@X `@Unknown Leah PlunkettGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial9Garamond5& zaTahoma"1h&&G  G !4d2qHX ? 2^TAKE ACTION: Proposed Rule to Protect Social Security Funds in Bank Accounts from Garnishment sladansladanOh+'0 (4H Xd   `TAKE ACTION: Proposed Rule to Protect Social Security Funds in Bank Accounts from Garnishment sladan Normal.dotsladan2Microsoft Office Word@@|@|G՜.+,0h hp  G$National Consumer Law Center Inc.  ' _TAKE ACTION: Proposed Rule to Protect Social Security Funds in Bank Accounts from Garnishment Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012345789:;<=?@ABCDEHRoot Entry FJ1TableAWordDocument.(SummaryInformation(6DocumentSummaryInformation8>CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q