аЯрЁБс>ўџ MOўџџџNџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅС#` јП bjbj5G5G C:W-W-Ў?/џџџџџџЄЮЮЮъX X X Т D***8b$†<  ЖЮњШ(№№№№њъT>,!!!!!!$VhО!˜EX j№№jjEX X №№ZŒŒŒjX №X №ŒjŒŒлX X '№Т ав\›‚Ч*jѓЃ|p0 ћ,V"j"V"'V"X '|jjŒjjjjjEEŒjjj jjjj   $ *   *l 4  "џџџџ 46 "џџџџX X X џџџџ  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT  FORMTEXT JANUARY TERM 2007  FORMTEXT RAMESE'S, INC., D/B/A CLEO'S, et al.,  FORMTEXT Appellants, v.Case No. 5D FORMTEXT 06-1795  FORMTEXT METROPOLITAN BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,  FORMTEXT Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 20, 2007  FORMTEXT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County,  FORMTEXT Cynthia Z. Mackinnon, Judge.  FORMTEXT Steven G. Mason of Steven G. Mason, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Lawson Lamar, State Attorney, Ninth Judicial Circuit,  FORMTEXT Willie May and Darlene Simmons, Assistant State Attorneys, Orlando, for Appellee.  FORMTEXT EVANDER, J. On May 27, 2005, Ramese's, Inc., d/b/a Cleo's, represented by Steven G. Mason, P.A. (collectively Appellants) submitted a public records request to the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation (MBI). Scott Campbell, a lieutenant in the Orange County Sheriff's Office, responded to Appellants' request. Campbell produced some of the requested documents, redacted others, and declined to produce others. Campbell contended the non-produced items were exempt from a public records request. Appellants objected to the redactions and the non-production of certain documents. Appellants subsequently filed a lawsuit against MBI seeking to obtain the requested documents which had not been produced (or had been redacted). The State Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida filed a motion and amended motion to quash service of process and dismiss the complaint, alleging MBI was not a suable entity. A copy of the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation Mutual Cooperation Agreement ("Agreement") was attached to the amended motion. A hearing was ultimately held on the amended motion. The trial court found MBI was not a suable entity and dismissed Appellants' action with prejudice. We affirm. MBI is a cooperative, multi-agency law enforcement task force in Central Florida, originally consisting of seven member agencies under the Agreement. The Agreement provides that MBI's purpose is "to be a coordinated multi-agency law enforcement unit directed at vice, narcotics, organized crime, racketeering, and other criminal enterprises in the Ninth Judicial Circuit, including Orange County and Osceola County, Florida, to allow for specialization and an ongoing and coordinated approach, as well as common utilization of training and support functions and the pooling of investigative and administrative resources." This court has previously held that a multi-agency law enforcement task force is only subject to suit if the parties that created the task force intended to create a separate legal entity. Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. v. Croft, 844 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Here, the Agreement does not contain any indication that the member agencies intended to create a separate legal entity capable of being sued in its own name. Under the Agreement, each member agency is represented on MBI's governing board. Each member agency assigns law enforcement and administrative personnel to MBI at a staffing level determined by that member agency's representative on the governing board. The respective member agencies "retain full responsibility for the compensation, retirement, insurance, liability and discipline of their own personnel assigned to the MBI." MBI is funded by contributions of equipment and staffing from the individual budgets of the member agencies and does not have a centralized budget. The member agencies provide in-kind contributions of items such as office space, utilities, gasoline, telephone costs, etc., in such proportion as determined by the governing board. Member agencies may also elect to contribute cash for recurring operational expenses. These provisions reflect that the member agencies did not intend MBI to be a separate legal entity. Each member agency retained control and responsibility over its own personnel. Furthermore, MBI does not have a centralized budget, but is instead funded by contributions of equipment and staffing from the individual budgets of the member agencies. The trial court properly concluded that MBI was not a legal entity capable of being sued. Id., at 697; see also Brown v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Drug Task Force, 255 F.3d 475 (8th Cir. 2001); Hervey v. Estes, 65 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. 1995). Appellants contend that an affirmance of the trial court's decision would unfairly require them to bring an action against all the agency members. We disagree. The Agreement implicitly recognizes the right of each member agency to have access to all documents in the possession of MBI. Because the Agreement fails to designate a particular member agency to be responsible for responding to public records requests, it would appear Appellants could bring its action against any of the member agencies. AFFIRMED.  FORMTEXT TORPY and  FORMTEXT LAWSON, JJ., concur.  The Agreement was dated February 8, 1996. This type of mutual aid agreement is specifically authorized by the Legislature. Ї 23.1225(1)(a), Fla. Stat.  The member agencies, as set forth in the Mutual Cooperation Agreement, are the State Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, the Sheriff of Orange County, the Sheriff of Osceola County, the Orlando Police Department, the Winter Park Police Department, the Apopka Police Department, and the Ocoee Police Department.  The agency members would be ascertained by a review of the Mutual Aid Agreement. Section 23.1225(4) requires that a copy of a mutual aid agreement must be filed with the Department of Law Enforcement.  During oral argument, counsel for the State Attorney's Office acknowledged that an action to obtain MBI's public records could be brought against either the State Attorney's Office or the Orange County Sheriff (Lt. Campbell's employer). Section 23.1225(1)(a) requires a mutual aid agreement to designate the agency or entity that shall bear liability arising from acts undertaken under the agreement.     PAGE 3 PAGE 2 ]^hij{|‚ŒŽ’ВГДЙКФХЦЯабуфюя№їјћќ     - . 3 4 > ёчёужЭУжНжуЕу­ЕуЉуЕуž—žуžЉуЕу‡ЕуЕуЕуЕуЉуЕуž—jЄUj„UjU hA;h% ШjhA;h% ШUhГ vj†Ujh% ШU h% Ш^JjU^JhFIh% Ш^JjhFIh% ШU^Jh% Шh% Ш^JmH sH jh% ШU^JmH sH .N}~€ЖЗгдзљђспппйппппЩЕ„˜ў$If]„˜ўlЦџ$IflЦџ„˜ў]„˜ў$ Ц€„h„]„h^„a$ $„h„]„h^„a$ Ўэ §§§љњћ 0 1 K L n o Œ  Ь ї ј ЇЅЅЅЅЅЅЅЅЅЅ•„˜ў$If]„˜ўlЦџ$IflЦџXkd$$If–ж0џ€ѕ$ѓu tрі6ііжџџжџџжџџжџџ4ж4жs4жaі> ? @ H I | ‹  Ž ˜ ™ š Щ Ъ Ь Э з и й э ю њ ћ     / H I M ƒ „ Ž   в с т ц ч ё ђ ѓ њ ћ   D d е ђ ѓ    ч 9 їьшьшфшмшдмшмшмшЬмшмшмшФмшРшмшРмшИмРшмш­Іž­ш­шРš–š–’–š–’šhIhљzіhЃ`Hj:U hДj%h% ШjhДj%h% ШUjJUhГ vjXUj"UjІUjh% ШUhwh% ШjhA;h% ШUjU9ј љ њ J K L ы“ƒƒƒ$IflЦџXkdД$$If–ж0џЈ ѕ$ M tрі6ііжџџжџџжџџжџџ4ж4жs4жaі„˜ў$If]„˜ўlЦџL M у ф „tt$IflЦџzkdц$$If–lжж0”џHќ$ДџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџДџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ tрж0џџџџџџі6ііжџџџџџџџџжџџџџџџџџжџџџџџџџџжџџџџџџџџ4ж4ж laіф х ц  : Г"-|lhrs„‚‚‚}}}}}}}}}‚gdГ vzkdж$$If–lжж0”џHќ$ДџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџДџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ tрж0џџџџџџі6ііжџџџџџџџџжџџџџџџџџжџџџџџџџџжџџџџџџџџ4ж4ж laі9 : Щ Ъ ъ ,кшќ  /3e…љ$3GHIJl‹ !"рэх+2ЅД лошњ>NЧЬўџ   deghrst~€ќјєјєј№јьј№јтј№ј№јє№єј№јтьо№оєјойдоєоєоєоьоаЫаЫйЫаЫа№аСає№аСНаНќЕќ­ЕjМUjh% ШUhЪ№jha980JU ha986ha98 hW6 hOfz6hWjhЃ`H0JUhљzіhOfzh'nhЃ`Hh% ШD€…†‹Œ–—˜žŸ­ЎЏKLŠ‹WXэю№ёѓєії§ў            ќєќєќьєќєќхооооййййвЯвЧвЯвЯвЧвЯх0JmHnHu0J j0JU jU j0JU hA;h% Шj< Ujh% ШUh% Ш*sЎJK‰ŠVWыьэя№ђѓѕіјљњћќ§  §ћћћћћћћћ§§§§§§§§§љ§љ§№ъ§№„h]„h„ќџ„&`#$         ієђєэєєє$a$$„h]„ha$A 0PP1hP:pwАа/ Ар=!А "А # $ %ААаАа а†DџџџџTermŠThis field should contain the month of January or July and the current year. If the date is January through June then the term is January|Dџџџџ Appellant‚Dџџџџ Type_apl_pet|Dџџџџ Case_numbЂ$$If–!vh5жѓ5жu#vѓ#vu:V– tрж0џџџџџџі6і5жѓ5жu4жs4жzDџџџџAppelleeˆDџџџџType_aplee_resp|Dџџџџ Case_type’DџџџџLower_Tribunal_JudgeЂ$$If–!vh5ж 5жM#v #vM:V– tрж0џџџџџџі6і5ж 5жM4жs4жŽDџџџџAppellant_Attorneyb$$If–!vh5жД5жД#vД:V–l tрі6іі5жД/ж џџџџџџџџŒDџџџџAppellee_Attorneyb$$If–!vh5жД5жД#vД:V–l tрі6іі5жД/ж џџџџџџџџ‚Dџџџџ PrimaryJudge€Dџџџџ SeniorJudge€Dџџџџ JuniorJudge†œN@ёџN Normal$a$ CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH R@R  Heading 1$Є№Є<@&5CJ KH \^JaJ T@T  Heading 2$Є№Є<@&56CJ\]^JaJN@N  Heading 3$Є№Є<@&5CJ\^JaJDA@ђџЁD Default Paragraph FontRi@ѓџГR  Table Normalі4ж l4жaі (k@єџС(No List xš@Гѓx  Table Grid7:Vж0џџџџџџ 7$8$H$_HJўOJ 5DCA Body Text„аdрЄx`„аHўOH Center and Bold$a$5^J:ўO": Double SpacedрB@2B  Footnote Text „а`„аaJ@ўOB@ Issues„ „p„0§]„ ^„p`„0§6ўOR6 Quote„ „ ]„ ^„ ZўOZ Underline Center & Bold$a$ 5>*^J4@r4 Header  ЦрР!4 @‚4 Footer  ЦрР!2)@Ђ‘2  Page Number^JHўOH 1.5 inch quote„p„p]„p^„pDўOD 2 inch quote„@ „@ ]„@ ^„@ JўOJ Half inch quote„а„а]„а^„аD&@ЂбD Ѓ`HFootnote ReferenceH*^J HўdмЉ>AџџџџџџмA:џџџџ џџ z™ џџ z™џџš"  ZN}~€ЖЗгдзљњћ01KLnoŒЬїјљњJKLMуфхц:Г" - ЎJK‰ћ $Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ№Ќr ЌЌ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ Ќ Ќ ЌJЌ4В мЌмЌмЌЇмЌмЌ4В $Ќ$Ќ$Ќџ$`™&џ$zђ+џ$zђ+џ$Žџ$zђ+$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$Ќ†Ќ$Ќ$Ќ$ЌN}~€ЖЗгдзљњћ01KLnoŒЬїјљњJKLMуфхц:Г" - | lhrsЎJK‰ŠVWыьэя№ђѓѕіјљњћќ§  ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0 ИŽ0  € ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0 ИŽ0  ИŽ0€ИŽ0 ИŽ0 M ИŽ0 ИŽ0 56 ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0ј€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0pŸИŽ0€ИŽ0ŸИŽ0€ИŽ0ŸИŽ0€ИŽ0ŸИŽ0€ИŽ0ŸИЮ0pИŽ0ŸИЮ0pИŽ0ŸИŽ0  „XyИŽ0  ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0€ИŽ0ŸИЮ0€ИŽ0ŸИЮ0€ИŽ0ŸИŽ0„Ÿ *,.1> 9 € љј L ф s   ]i{ГЙХЯуяїћ-3?H™ЩЬиэњHƒсцђњs…‹—ž •F”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•ŒF”џ•Œ$&1!”џ•€!”џ•€џџ Term Appellant Type_apl_pet Case_numbType_aplee_resp Case_typeLower_Tribunal_Judge PrimaryJudge SeniorJudge JuniorJudge\Йу3Ьцs‹ |ДајIЪюћ†Ÿ­э UЁTъжјџџџџџџџџџ„ш„€щЦш^„ш`„€щ^Jo(.€„ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ў^J.‚„p„LџЦp^„p`„Lџ^J.€„@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ў^J.€„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ў^J.‚„р„LџЦр^„р`„Lџ^J.€„А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ў^J.€„€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ў^J.‚„P„LџЦP^„P`„Lџ^J.UЁџџџџџџџџ UV        хWТ,!Дj%}8),01a98A;Ѓ`HFIO'nvГ vwOfzѓi}Iˆx ŽЋrkБ\jЦ% ШЪ№Ц9№љzідзљњјљњKLMуфхџ@€8ЃP@џџUnknownџџџџџџџџџџџџG‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €џArial"Ž№аhїšД†їšД†ТŠДFег_y`q!№  ЛД‚4Бч№ШX №џ?џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ2џџ7IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Ќ˜ рьј$ 0< \ h t €Œ”œЄф8IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Normal.dot2Microsoft Office Word@@$‚YЧ@"У›‚Ч@"У›‚ЧегўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎœX€ˆ” ЌДМФЬ дмфь є 8ф І_БК 8IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TitleP :B_PID_LINKBASEфA ўџџџ !"#$%ўџџџ'()*+,-./01234567ўџџџ9:;<=>?ўџџџABCDEFGўџџџ§џџџJўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РFРa›‚ЧL€Data џџџџџџџџџџџџ1Tableџџџџ&f"WordDocumentџџџџC:SummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџ8DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџ@CompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџqџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9ВqRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF0ТсJƒЧR€Data џџџџџџџџџџџџ1Tableџџџџ&f"WordDocumentџџџџC: ўџџџ !"#$%ўџџџ'()*+,-./01234567ўџџџ9:;<=>?ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџQ§џџџўџџџўџџџўџџџPџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџ ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџTitleP <D_PID_LINKBASEфASummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџ8DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџьCompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџqџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9ВqўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎœX€ˆ” ЌДМФЬ дмфь є 8ф І_БК 8IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA