аЯрЁБс>ўџ 24ўџџџ1џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅС7 №ПкbjbjUU .07|7|mlџџџџџџlДДДДДДДШ~~~8ЖЪШc јъ”~~~~~~~тфффффф$[ { В Д~~~~~ FДД~~ FFF~vД~Д~тF~тFœFтДДт~о @cЉXТШЖ~єRтт3 0c т- F- тFШШДДДДйExamining a Stock Fund's Portfolio, Part 2 Introduction We've described the Morningstar style box as the "snapshot" of a fund's investment style. It's the best place to start if you're trying to uncover how a fund invests. But don't stop there. A handful of other portfolio statistics reveal additional insights into individual funds--information about a fund's risk and return potential that style boxes don't yield. Sector Weightings Both Janus Twenty  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=JAVLX')" JAVLX and Fidelity Growth Company  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=FDGRX')" FDGRX land in the large-cap growth portion of the style box, yet the funds have different Achilles' heels. Janus Twenty had 60% of its assets in technology stocks at the end of July 1999, while Fidelity Growth Company had just 22% of its assets invested in that part of the market. If technology stocks had tumbled, which fund do you think would have been worse for the wear? Janus Twenty, of course. Welcome to one of our favorite portfolio statistics: sector weightings. Stocks fall into one of 10 Morningstar sectors--utilities, energy, financials, industrials, durables, staples, services, retail, health, and technology. Morningstar calculates a fund's sector exposure based on the amount of money it has in stocks in each sector. By knowing how heavily a fund invests in a given sector, you'll know how vulnerable it is to a downturn in that part of the market or how much sector risk it's taking on. Median Market Capitalization Okay, so median market capitalization is included in Morningstar's style box. But you should examine it anyway because there are small-cap funds and there are really small-cap funds. Take FAM Value  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=FAMVX')" FAMVX and Heartland Value  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=HRTVX')" HRTVX, for example. Both land in the small-cap value portion of the style box. Yet FAM's median market cap at the end of July 1999 was over $1 billion, while Heartland's was just $197 million. That's an enormous difference. See, Heartland specializes in micro-cap stocks, or the smallest of the small. The fund therefore performs well against other small-value funds when microcaps are doing well in the market. But it also lags when microcaps are not doing well. Investor's who aren't aware of Heartland's bias might evaluate the fund as good or bad, without understanding the reason behind its performance. Conversely, there's a difference between large-cap and really large-cap funds. Vanguard Growth Index  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=VIGRX')" VIGRX, for instance, carried a median market capitalization of $120 billion at the end of July 1999, while Amcap's  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=AMCPX')" AMCPX clocked in at just $19 billion. While both are large-cap growth funds, the former fund will outperform the latter when giant-sized companies are leading the market. Conversely, the latter fund should one-up the former if smaller companies (well, small within the large-cap division) have the lead. Number of Holdings It's important to know whether a fund holds 20 or 200 stocks. You'd expect a fund with fewer stocks to be more volatile than one with hundreds of names on hand. While that isn't always the case, it often is. So just as you need to be aware of funds that place a large portion of their assets in one or two sectors, you need to know if a fund places a large portion of assets in a small number of holdings. For example, Oakmark Select  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=OAKLX')" OAKLX and Gabelli Asset  HYPERLINK "javascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=GABAX')" GABAX are both mid-cap blend funds, yet the former owns just 20 stocks while the latter stockpiles hundreds of names. Oakmark Select is taking on more risk--its performance is dependent on the success or failure of a much smaller number of stocks. (We'll discuss concentrated funds, or funds that own a small number of stocks, more in a later session.) Turnover Rates A fund's turnover rate loosely represents the percentage of a fund's holdings that have changed over the past year, and it gives an idea of how long a manager holds on to a stock. A fund calculates its turnover ratio by dividing its total sales or purchases (excluding cash), whichever is less, by its average monthly assets for the year. You can translate this math easily: A fund that trades 25% of its portfolio each year holds a stock for four years, on average. Despite its seeming simplicity, turnover ratio has its quirks. For instance, a dramatic change in the fund's asset base (the turnover ratio's denominator) can give a false impression of a fund's trading activity. If the manager doesn't change her trading pace, a fund's turnover ratio will decline as assets rise. Conversely, a shrinking asset base can inflate a fund's turnover ratio. Furthermore, if a manager sells a chunk of a fund's portfolio to meet redemptions but doesn't purchase any new securities, her turnover ratio would be zero. Why? Because turnover ratio is calculated by using the smaller figure of either total sales or purchases to divide its average monthly assets for the year, and there are no purchases in the example above. Turnover can give you a sense of a manager's trading activity, but don't read too much into a fund's turnover ratio. Buy-and-hold managers will have lower turnover ratios than managers who trade on short-term factors. And most importantly, very high turnover managers tend to practice aggressive strategies. High-turnover funds tend to be more volatile than other funds in their categories. Quiz There is only one correct answer to each question. 1. Sector weightings tell you what? a. What a fund's investment style is. b. How much sector risk a fund is taking on. c. How much price risk a fund is taking on. 2. Price/earnings multiples tell you what? a. How much sector risk a fund is taking on. b. How much price risk a fund is taking on. c. How much per-issue risk a fund is taking on. 3. A fund's number of holdings tells you what? a. How much sector risk a fund is taking on. b. How much price risk a fund is taking on. c. How much risk per holding a fund is taking on. 4. A fund's turnover rate tells you what? a. How much price risk a fund is taking on. b. How much per-issue risk a fund is taking on. c. How much trading a fund manager does. 5. Which stock fund is likely the most volatile? a. A fund with a P/E of 25, 200 holdings, and a 20% turnover rate. b. A fund with a P/E of 30, 100 holdings, and a 50% turnover rate. c. A fund with a P/E of 35, 25 holdings, and a 200% turnover rate. Morningstar.com Interactive Classroom Course: Mutual Funds 208 Examining a Stock Fund’s Portfolio, Part 2 ,9—œЅЖИЪЫ#$)*GH ЁІЇ/ L ы ё   l m r s ˆ ‰ с т ч ш ЊЋ  xyбвзиЪЫ#$)*=>–—œњєфзЧзфКзЈзЈЁЈзЈзЈЁЈзфзЧзЈзЈЁЈзЈзЈЁЈзЈзЈЁЈзЈзЈЁЈзфзЈзЈЁЈзЈзЈЁЈзф 0JCJaJ"jB*CJOJQJUaJphB*CJOJQJaJphџ6B*CJOJQJ]aJphB*CJOJQJaJph5B*CJOJQJ\aJphџ0JB*OJQJphџ?+,9сЅИ4/ L  EЎњнЪQW‹Би5b‘П§§§јјјјјјјјјјјјјјјјјјяјјјјј„аd,`„аd,mйўўЪQRWX‰‹m“›жйкђыурнкнан5B*CJ\ph3™fCJCJCJ5B*\phџ CJOJQJB*CJOJQJaJph Пђ#RГп ?jт'm“зийкњњњёњњњњњњњњњяяээњ„аd,`„аd,,&P1ѕАа/ Ар=!А"Аа#а$`%ААААА i8@ёџ8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH <A@ђџЁ< Default Paragraph Font6ўoЂё6 head61dh5CJ\aJph,@, Header  ЦрР!, @, Footer  ЦрР!:^`": Normal (Web)ЄdЄd[$\$:U`Ђ1: Hyperlink>*B*OJQJo(phк0џџџџ+,9сЅИ4/LE   ЎњнЪQW‹Би5b‘Пђ#RГп ?jт'm“зл˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€š@0€€˜@0€€ 0kkkkknкПкйЪ#)G ІlrˆсчЊ  x б з Ъ#)=–œкX4џŒX4џŒX4џŒX4џŒX4џŒX4џŒX4џŒX4џŒ6;W ` • ž p w ЛТ/6klmилE›ƒ†chjnmил3333џџ Debbie ThorneMC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Document2.asd Debbie Thorne`C:\Clubs\Material Girls\Education\Morningstar\Mutual Fund 208 Examining a Stock Fund, Part 2.docџ@€kkX$4kjкp@џџUnknownџџџџџџџџџџџџG‡:џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡:џArialA& Trebuchet MS"qˆ№аh:Ji&LJi&ї 0$№аZѕ€20Х2ƒQ№џџ*Examining a Stock Fund's Portfolio, Part 2 Debbie Thorne Debbie Thorneўџ р…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0 ˜Ьи№ќ 4@ \ h t€ˆ˜ф+Examining a Stock Fund's Portfolio, Part 2dxamDebbie Thorneocebbebb Normal.dotnDebbie Thorneoc1bbMicrosoft Word 9.0u@д­є@ДгЋXТ@ˆ XТїўџ еЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎX hp|„Œ” œЄЌД М ѓфc0 Х  +Examining a Stock Fund's Portfolio, Part 2 TitleЌ 8@ _PID_HLINKSфAd0arKjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=GABAX')lsKjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=OAKLX')|uKjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=AMCPX')zf Kjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=VIGRX')ek Kjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=HRTVX')v|Kjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=FAMVX')wvKjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=FDGRX')lkKjavascript:loadit('http://quote.morningstar.com/switch.html?ticker=JAVLX') ўџџџ ўџџџ"#$%&'(ўџџџ*+,-./0ўџџџ§џџџ3ўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF@cЉXТ5€1TableџџџџџџџџџџџџWordDocumentџџџџџџџџ.0SummaryInformation(џџџџ!DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџ)CompObjџџџџjObjectPoolџџџџџџџџџџџџ@cЉXТ@cЉXТџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq