ࡱ> npm 4bjbj 4tee,LL0000Dt0&0^iii,~fiiiii    i i   P]bSG 0&     iii iii&iiiiiiiiiL :   Debate Should College Athletes Be Paid??? Student-athletes generate billions of dollars for universities and private companies. Student-athletes earn free tuition, which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. Should college athletes be paid more? Bill Clinton might say it depends on what the definition of "paid" is. There is a significant and growing gap between the value of a scholarship and what a student-athlete genuinely needs. Many people in college sports have argued that the scholarship model needs to be updated so this gap can be closed. However, when so many others talk about college athletes getting "paid," they are not talking about merely the cost of attendance. They're talking about giving athletes what they're "worth." It's a convincing argument when cast alongside the mind-boggling dollars that are pouring in. The SEC recently surpassed the $1 billion mark for football receipts. The Big Ten is close behind at $905 million. The football programs at Texas, Florida, Georgia, Michigan and Penn State earn between $40 million and $80 million each year in profits. The NCAA received $771 million from CBS and Turner to broadcast last year's basketball tournament. The NCAA basketball tournaments, or "March Madness," have become a huge business. As Forbes' Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games, "thanks in part to a HYPERLINK "http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2013/04/01/the-money-behind-the-ncaa-final-four/"$700,000 ad rate for a 30-second spot during the Final Four." Athletic conferences receive millions of dollars in payouts from the NCAA when their teams advance deep into the tournament. Ditto for the coaches of the final squads standing. The NCAA, as a whole, HYPERLINK "http://www.nj.com/ledger-dalessandro/index.ssf/2013/03/lawsuit_filed_by_former_nets_forward_ed_obannon_threatens_ncaas_economic_model.html"makes $6 billion annually. The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their efforts. A group of former players has filed an antitrust lawsuit alleging that student athletes are entitled to some of the money the NCAA makes off of using their names and likenesses on merchandise such as jerseys and video games. But on the flip side, the argument can be made that the opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their efforts. "Rather than push college athletics further and further from academics, HYPERLINK "http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204257504577151212467142838.html"we need to bring it closer," says NCAA president Mike Emmert. So should NCAA athletes be paid? Directions: The class will be split up into 2 teams; one team that thinks college athletes should be paid and the other that does not think college they should be paid. There are two parts to this assignment. 1. Each individual is responsible for a paper supporting his or her side. This paper is a research paper that has a minimum of 2 pages (not double spaced). Any and every source and piece of researched information needs to be cited to make your paper credible. This part of the project will be done on a Google Drive Word Document. As always, you will need to share it with me @  HYPERLINK "mailto:mr.riverso@gmail.com" mr.riverso@gmail.com. 2. Each team needs to choose 3 of their top arguments for a class debate. These 3 arguments will be put into a Google Drive Presentation along with their sources and also shared with me @  HYPERLINK "mailto:mr.riverso@gmail.com" mr.riverso@gmail.com. I understand these may be big groups but you will have 2 whole class periods to work on this and get the top 3 points prepped and ready for your debate. As a group and team you need to think of the other sides argument and make sure that you have evidence (FACTS) to help refute their claims. I feel the best way to achieve a team goal here is assign group tasks within the overall group. For example assign a group of individuals to come up with the top three arguments or a group of people to find rebuttals, etc 3. You will be given 5 days in class to complete this whole assignment. On the 6th day everything is due in my shared file. That means your paper and your groups Google Presentation with arguments and rebuttals. On the 6th day you will also have your class debate. 1st period: Due April 2nd. 2nd period: Due April 2nd 4th period: Due April 2nd 6th period: Due April 2nd Debate Rules: The classroom debates are exercises designed to allow you to strengthen your skills in the areas of leadership, interpersonal influence, teambuilding, group problem solving, and oral presentation. All group members are expected to participate in the research, development, and presentation of your debate position. Preparation will require substantial computer research. ***Attack the idea not the person. Do not present opinion as facts!!! Debate Format First argument: 4 minute Position Presentation Pro 4 minute Position Presentation Con 2 minute Work Period 2 minute Rebuttal - Pro 2 minute Rebuttal Con Second Argument: 4 minutes - Pro 4 minutes Con 2 minute Work Period 2 minute Rebuttal-Pro 2 minute Rebuttal- Con Third Argument: 4 minutes - Pro 4 minutes Con 2 minute Work Period 2 minute Rebuttal-Pro 2 minute Rebuttal- Con Closing Remarks: 4 minutes- Pro 4 Minutes- Con While a team is not required to use all of the time allocated to each debate component, speakers must stop immediately when the allocated time runs out. Team members are prohibited from speaking to the audience or opposing team except at the times specifically allocated to them. Thus, there can be no immediate, reciprocal interchange of comments between the teams. Debate Grading Rubric Names___________________________________________ Date___________________ Team: 1 2 Criteria5432Score1. Organization & Clarity Main arguments and responses are outlined in a clear and orderly way. Enhanced with visuals. Completely clear and orderly presentation. Used several visuals and props to enhance presentation.Mostly clear and orderly in all parts. Visuals/props used werent explained fullyClear in some parts but not overall. Limited visuals/props used, not appropriate Unclear and disorganized throughout. No visuals or props used.2. Opening Statement Explained and defined energy sourceExcellent explanation of energy source using many definitions and descriptionsMany good facts and definitions were given with only minor gapsSome decent descriptions but little supporting facts given.Few or no real definitions or explanations given.3. Affirmative Statements: demonstrated knowledge of subject supported by researchVery persuasive arguments are supported by researchMany good arguments given with only minor problemsSome decent arguments, but little research to support itFew or no real arguments given and no supporting research4. Negative Rebuttals: Made specific arguments about the weak points of the opposing teamExcellent rebuttals which focused on the weak points of the opposing team using specific facts and statisticsMany good arguments about the opposing team using some facts and statisticsArguments showed little knowledge about opposing teamArguments showed no real knowledge of the opposing team5. Affirmative Rebuttals: The team was able to defend itself against attack by extending own position using additional facts to support claimUsed excellent new researched facts to support their sideMany good facts which supported their sideHad some problems coming up with facts to defend their sideWas unable to give any facts to defend its side 6. Closing Statement Summarized the main points of the debateSummarized the main points in detail, highlighting the positive points in their argument and the negative details in their oppositions argumentsSummarized some but not all main points, highlighting the positive points in their argument and the negative details in their oppositions argumentsLacked detail in summary.Did not summarize the main points of both viewpoints. Total Score _____/30 = ________ Dimension SophisticatedCompetentNeeds WorkIntroductionPosition and exceptions, if any, are clearly stated. Organization of the argument is completely and clearly outlined and implemented. 5-10 ptsPosition is clearly stated. Organization of argument is clear in parts or only partially described and mostly implemented. 3-5 ptsPosition is vague. Organization of argument is missing, vague, or not consistently maintained. 0-3 ptsResearchResearch selected is highly relevant to the argument, is presented accurately and completely the method, results, and implications are all presented accurately; Theory is relevant, accurately described and all relevant components are included; relationship between research and theory is clearly articulated and accurate. 5-10 ptsResearch is relevant to the argument and is mostly accurate and complete there are some unclear components or some minor errors in the method, results or implications. Theory is relevant and accurately described, some components may not be present or are unclear. Connection to theory is mostly clear and complete, or has some minor errors. 3-5 ptsResearch selected is not relevant to the argument or is Vague and incomplete components are missing or inaccurate or unclear. Theory is not relevant or only relevant for some aspects; theory is not clearly articulated and/or has incorrect or incomplete components. Relationship between theory and research is unclear or inaccurate, major errors in the logic are present. 0-3ptsConclusionsConclusion is clearly stated and connections to the research and position are clear and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit. 5-10 ptsConclusion is clearly stated and connections to research and position are mostly clear, some aspects may not be connected or minor errors in logic are present. 3-5 ptsConclusion may not be clear and the connections to the research are incorrect or unclear or just a repetition of the findings without explanation. Underlying logic has major flaws; connection to position is not clear. 0-3ptsWritingPaper is coherently organized and the logic is easy to follow. There are no spelling or grammatical errors and terminology is clearly defined. Writing is clear and concise and persuasive. 5-10 ptsPaper is generally well organized and most of the argument is easy to follow. There are only a few minor spelling or grammatical errors, or terms are not clearly defined. Writing is mostly clear but may lack conciseness. 3-5 ptsPaper is poorly organized and difficult to read does not flow logically from one part to another. There are several spelling and/or grammatical errors; technical terms may not be defined or are poorly defined. Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. 0-3 pts *+m o C D tuv|}./01UVWqrf颶鎶mchfOJQJ^J'jhfhfOJQJU^JhfhbOJQJ^J'j!hfhfOJQJU^J'jhfhfOJQJU^J!jhfhfOJQJU^Jh:8}h:8}OJQJ^Jh:8}OJQJ^Jh:8}h:8}OJQJhfhfOJQJ^JhHOJQJ^J$n o D E F 12MNPgdf 1$7$8$H$gdfgd:8}*+MX  45IJLMNl  45IJKb웑}oo`oVh<OJQJ^JhrGhNk0JOJQJ^JjhNkOJQJU^Jh. OJQJ^JhNkOJQJ^JhWOJQJ^JhqOJQJ^Jh:8}OJQJ^JhrGhC$0JOJQJ^JjhC$OJQJU^JhC$hH56OJQJ^JhC$hC$56OJQJ^JhHOJQJ^JhC$OJQJ^J!bcdqOQg#-/YZ[\^krtuvwyhChCH*OJQJ^Jh3h3H*OJQJ^Jh3OJQJ^JhF,hF,H*OJQJ^JhF,OJQJ^JhROJQJ^JhNkOJQJ^JhqOJQJ^Jh. OJQJ^Jh<OJQJ^JhCOJQJ^J4PQZ[vZgdC$ 1$7$8$H$gdC$gdf VYZ]{}Ĺ{{l`WNEN:hC$h OJQJh5OJQJh 5OJQJhC$5OJQJhC$hC$5OJQJh$_5B*OJQJ\ph#hC$hC$5B*OJQJ\phhC$5B*OJQJ\ph hC$5>*B*OJQJ\phhC$hC$>*OJQJhC$hC$OJQJ&hC$hC$5>*B*OJQJ\phh3OJQJ^Jh$_OJQJ^JhC$OJQJ^JhCOJQJ^J    78NOP_`abcjkrsz{5EFdżܼܙhqOJQJhC$5OJQJhq5OJQJhC$h5OJQJhC$hOJQJhh5OJQJh 5OJQJhh OJQJhC$hC$5OJQJh5OJQJhC$hC$OJQJhC$OJQJhOJQJ2 7Pbr45FUefgdf^gdqgdgdC$^gddeV }""$$''')))Ž|l]Nh=hc*CJOJQJaJh=h:8}CJOJQJaJh=h=CJOJQJ\aJh=h=5CJOJQJaJ"h=h=5CJOJQJ\aJh=h=CJOJQJaJh=OJQJh:8}OJQJhfOJQJhfOJQJ^JhPdh:8}B*OJQJphhC$hC$>*OJQJhC$hC$OJQJhqhqOJQJV W $$Ifa$gd69gd=$a$gd=gd=gdf !!90'' $Ifgd69 $Ifgd69kd$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T!!!%"e"f" $$Ifa$gd69 $Ifgd69f"g"}"""900' $Ifgd69 $Ifgd69kds$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T"0#l### $$Ifa$gd69 $Ifgd69####'$90'' $Ifgd69 $Ifgd69kd/$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T'$Z$$$$ $$Ifa$gd69 $Ifgd69$$$)%%%90000 $Ifgd69kd$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T%&Q&R&S&$kd$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T $$Ifa$gd69 $Ifgd69S&m&&'F'''' $$Ifa$gd69 $Ifgd69 $Ifgd69''''()90000 $Ifgd69kdc$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T)5)k)l)m)$kd$$IfTlֈF_ a,"@,064 la4yt69T $$Ifa$gd69 $Ifgd69m)t))))))))))))))))) $If^gd= $If]gd= $Ifgd=gdf ^`gd=gd=)))**6+7+f+g+2-3-i-j------.[.\.a.b.......//N/O/////001 1Z1[1111111K3L33333&4'4444444ôhcOJQJh=h:8}CJOJQJaJh=hC$CJOJQJaJh=hc*CJOJQJaJh=CJOJQJ_HaJh=h=CJOJQJaJ h=h=CJOJQJ_HaJ>)))w***7+^+f+cZZMMZZZ $If]gd= $Ifgd=kd$$Ifl\d /& x0$664 layt=f+g+p+,,3-j---cZZZMMMM $If]gd= $Ifgd=kd $$Ifl\d /& x0$664 layt=-.#.\..../O//// $Ifgd= $If]gd= ///70@000 1[1cZZZMMZZ $If]gd= $Ifgd=kd3 $$Ifl\d /& x0$664 layt=[11111122L3ZM $If]gd=kd $$Ifl\d /& x0$664 layt= $Ifgd=L3333'44444MHHgdfkd $$Ifl\d /& x0$664 layt= $Ifgd= $If]gd=444444444444444gdf44hfhcOJQJ21h:p/ =!"#$% !DyK yK http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2013/04/01/the-money-behind-the-ncaa-final-four/DyK yK http://www.nj.com/ledger-dalessandro/index.ssf/2013/03/lawsuit_filed_by_former_nets_forward_ed_obannon_threatens_ncaas_economic_model.htmlDyK yK http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204257504577151212467142838.html$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If4!vh#v~#v#v(#v#v#v:V l065@555,4a4yt69T$$If!vh#v&#v #vx#v:V l0$665&5 5x54ayt=$$If!vh#v&#v #vx#v:V l0$665&5 5x54ayt=$$If!vh#v&#v #vx#v:V l0$665&5 5x54ayt=$$If!vh#v&#v #vx#v:V l0$665&5 5x54ayt=$$If!vh#v&#v #vx#v:V l0$665&5 5x54ayt=666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA`D Default Paragraph FontRi@R 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List 6U`6 C$0 Hyperlink >*B*phDB`D = Body Text5CJOJPJQJ\J/J =Body Text Char5OJPJQJ\aJB>`"B =Title$a$5CJ$OJPJQJ\F/1F = Title Char5CJ$OJPJQJ\aJH`BH = No SpacingCJ_HaJmH sH tH PK!pO[Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢]yl#!MB;.n̨̽\A1&ҫ QWKvUbOX#&1`RT9<l#$>r `С-;c=1g~'}xPiB$IO1Êk9IcLHY<;*v7'aE\h>=^,*8q;^*4?Wq{nԉogAߤ>8f2*<")QHxK |]Zz)ӁMSm@\&>!7;wP3[EBU`1OC5VD Xa?p S4[NS28;Y[꫙,T1|n;+/ʕj\\,E:! t4.T̡ e1 }; [z^pl@ok0e g@GGHPXNT,مde|*YdT\Y䀰+(T7$ow2缂#G֛ʥ?q NK-/M,WgxFV/FQⷶO&ecx\QLW@H!+{[|{!KAi `cm2iU|Y+ ި [[vxrNE3pmR =Y04,!&0+WC܃@oOS2'Sٮ05$ɤ]pm3Ft GɄ-!y"ӉV . `עv,O.%вKasSƭvMz`3{9+e@eՔLy7W_XtlPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-!pO[Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 -_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!!Z!theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ'( theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]# , tbd)44 !#19P !f""#'$$%S&')m))f+-/[1L344"$%&'()*+,-./02345678u|. V q 4I 4I,XXXXX8@0( >S>?V> B S  ? KNs"v"""b#e#$$&"&<(?(((**++,,, KFT$B7#<#3%8%%%&&&&&&'$'O'R'''((!)))\)_)))*,*++',0,,:::::::::::::::::::::F,. =c*369bPdNkA[m:8}H3 $_qC$<cfRECW,,@ ""Rz"",h@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3 *Cx Arial7@Cambria3N-3 fgA Arial NarrowA$BCambria Math qh#'#'%Q%Q20,,K#qHP $P'f2!xx ,Riverso, DanielRiverso, Daniel Oh+'0#   D P \hpx'Riverso, Daniel Normal.dotmRiverso, Daniel2Microsoft Macintosh Word@@ FSG@ FSG%G!PICT!zb HHb bHHzRhbb w{ްkZV^ZZo{{{w{޳ykZg9sso{skZkZsso{ckZo{swkZkZ{Zso{ckZ o{skZso{{o{g9o{o{s{s{g9 ws{wkZkZwcws{g9o{{scc^g9o{g9^VcwkZg9ccg9kZo{^wo{g9co{{{sg9^ccg9o{c kZco{Vg9ccg9g9wg9ckZg9scg9wcg9 {ss{swo{sw{s1wsw{wsswws{{so{wo{wswwg9o{sw{{ws{g9w{wwo{ww{{so{wkZwwswkZ{g9^kZcg9kZc^cs^Zg9^o{g9^g9o{kZcVc^ccg9{^g9cg9cc^^ckZg9^cscg9cs^c kZsg9^g9csg9g9kZo{^kZ;wwwso{s{so{wwww{ww{cZVZVo{ZwVZVkZ^VZo{VRkZZVZkZ^ZZg9Z{kZVZg9ZZo{ZRZkZVZg9ZRZkZVVRkZZZV^9{{{s{ws{{w1cg9^Zcc^kZkZg9^Zs^^g9^kZ^Z^ckZkZc^^ccskZVZg9ckZZckZ^cg9g9kZ^s^cckZ^g9kZo{Zg9co{g9cs{w{{ws{w{w{ws{wwssw{ww{wkZo{{w {ws{ww{w{wwg9swws{w{wg9{{w{%o{kZsckZsckZwg9kZkZc{޽%kZo{wkZo{sskZo{kZkZo{so{kZ{{so{{{g9{w{{kZo{ww{o{{{wwo{{wo{so{kZso{kZsww{ws{o{w{wso{w o{{{w{{o{wwg9w kZ^^ZckZg9c^^Vo{cc^g9o{Zg9c^^o{^ssc^o{g9g9^o{^^Z^o{^co{co{Z^ZZ^g9o{Zwcc^s^Zg{s{ wkZ{o{{o{{{w{ww{w{{{{{{^VVRVZVkZZg9{VRRskZcg9NsRZkZcckZZV"ZVVcZVRkZVZVcR^ZVVg9R^V^V^cRkZg9ZVNskZVsg9+ssw{{ssw{kZg9Vc^g9Zc^kZ^Zsg9Z^skZkZ^cZ^g9cV^kZ^w^ckZZs^g9g9VZZ^cw^^cZkZscskZ^^g9kZo{^cZkZ~{swwsw o{wss{ws{w{sw{sswws{g9swswwo{ws {wwsso{skZww{wsg9w{kZwg9o{3so{kZo{o{kZ^o{kZkZcso{co{co{kZckZo{o{kZo{ccskZkZcso{sckZwkZkZ^kZo{kZkZw^g9swg9kZwo{kZwsg9kZo{g9o{g9wo{^g9kZskZskZwo{kZkZo{kZo{kZg9kZo{kZkZg9o{wg9o{g9so{w^kZckZkZskZwkZkZo{g9ccwo{kZso{wo{kZkZo{kZuso{{{s{w{w{wo{{w{wkZ{o{{w{{ss{{wo{sw{ sw{{o{{wo{o{wo{{wkZZcg9cc^wg9cZckZ^o{^ZZcs^^c^o{V^o{^Zo{^Zo{Z^^c^o{Zc^^VskZ^Z^{o{^ckZcckZ^co{a{{{{{{w{o{w{{ {{w{www{{{^NsVVZkZZNsZNskZVZVZcg9V^cZZkZcg9JRV RV^g9R^c^g9ZRVo{NsRZRo{Vg9VVo{NsVRR^cg9VZR/www{w{wwwwc^g9o{cwg9*^ZwwZcwo{kZcckZco{ccsccg9cg9g9csZcg9skZcco{Zccg9g9Zo{^cwc^ccg9g9c^c{}wso{{swwss{sww{ss{wscwo{g9o{s{wss{sswwsso{kZwswws{s{wkZcssc{/o{kZ^o{kZ{^kZo{so{wkZo{o{g9kZo{so{g9co{g9ccwskZskZkZg9{o{o{g9so{skZkZco{o{g9{co{o{so{kZc{ckZo{kZo{^kZkZo{~kZ,g9o{wkZco{kZkZwckZg9kZkZ^wkZ{skZo{wg9o{{sg9kZo{kZc{g9g9ckZkZg9kZo{kZkZwo{kZsg9ckZ{kZo{skZw5w{{wwskZkZ{so{w{kZw{w{o{{{o{{o{wwswwg9kZo{swsg9ww{{c{{kZ{skZ{g9ww{w{{wg9{,kZZcg9ZZ{o{kZZo{g9Vso{Zg9g9sg9^^co{Z^c^o{co{c^kZs^^cc^kZ^csc^ckZccZc^Zo{co{o{ccZkZso{wo{{s{{w{o{o{{s{ {{sg9{{o{ww{s{w{{o{o{s{{o{wwso{o{{{wo{{{Ag9g9Z^ZZo{g9c^VZ^w^ZcVRVZo{VZo{cVZo{^cZcg9ZVkZZcZ^Z^o{^ZkZZ^c^Zg9^ZZkZ^ccZ^cZV{c{ {{ws{ww{w{ {wss{ww{{wswws{{DcZZcg9^ZkZZo{VZVZcg9Zcg9RwZo{g9^Z^c^Vg9ZsskZkZZ^Z^ZkZVZZg9sNsZo{VVo{g9ZVV^kZ^g9Z^RVcVg95w{s{{{{{{2g9sg9 o{^g9Zg9cZkZVo{g9g9cg9g9^.so{{wws o{s{so{so{o{so{s{go{o{{ssw{swwso{w{ o{sswssswww{{{CkZkZRo{cg9o{c^o{ZRZ^VR^kZ^R^RRV^VRwZg9^ZVcZo{VZVRZVwRZ^sVR^ZV^^kZZVVo{VVZZVZsas{{w{{{{ws{{{s{w{{{{{w{wo{^sc^VZ^wkZZ^co{^Z1o{cZZco{wVZo{V^kZg9^cV^o{VZ^ZR^VcZg9^^V^o{^Z^g9VcZo{^kZccZ^ZsP{{{{{w{{{wo{{{{{{{Co{^g9Vg9skZg9g9kZo{wg9ZcZkZwco{g9g9kZg9skZg9g9^V^VVkZkZ^o{g9cscg9o{{Vg9kZg9o{g9g9kZcg9cw^g9ckZsZg9wZccg9{wo{o{sco{wo{kZo{swo{wswo{ws{o{o{wo{kZ{sws{w{wo{o{so{wg9sswo{kZso{o{{wo{kZs9g9o{sso{kZckZo{o{wwso{g9o{so{sswo{sso{swo{kZcso{w{g9wg9kZg9swo{wo{sso{o{sskZo{o{sg9so{kZ{o{wg9so{{so{co{wkZg9so{g9kZkZckZkZo{kZg9kZskZkZg9kZcg9skZsg9kZckZo{g9s^g9cg9skZg9kZsg9kZwkZo{o{kZo{sg9g9kZss{w{s{{{s{{{wwsw{{{ kZwwo{{{o{{{s o{o{{kZ{w{{sg9VZkZc^ZZg9^Zg9RZcsVZZo{ZZ^o{RkZ^^Z ^^w^Z^o{cZwZVo{cZcg9^o{cZsZZ^o{VV^ZROw{kZ{ssw{www{s{wsso{{a!cVRVRV^cRkZg9Zs^g9kZg9Vo{kZVVZZkZkZVNsZZsRkZZVo{VVRNsZc{{w{|g9cg9g9kZ wg9g9kZkZg9o{kZg9g9kZg9kZg9!kZsg9g9^wkZZo{o{^ckZg9skZkZg9co{kZg9sg9^wkZckZwg9wkZkZg9wwwwkZwo{g9g9{kZo{wswo{kZkZ{o{^wo{kZkZwso{{o{ g9kZ{g9o{so{so{o{wo{kZ{o{wo{{co{sw{wkZwo{kZs{o{skZwo{wsco{kZwskZs{wskZo{skZwo{so{wss{ss{kZs {sso{sg9scwo{sg9wwscckZc^{c1g9co{cg9ccg9kZo{g9g9scskZg9^cckZg9ckZcg9cg9cg9o{cc{cg9V^o{sccsg9o{^g9ckZsg9l www{{sw{s{w{w{ss{wssswsww{{g9VZ=g9g9VZ^Nsco{ZsRRVkZc^kZRVg9cg9ZVZso{kZVVZRo{^kZZVZZVg9VZcZZkZZVo{cRVo{VkZNsV^^VVXw{o{wwwwwo{wo{o{s{wsswwcV^VRg9ZV^Vo{RNsg9cVVNsRkZZRV^Ns^g9Zc^V ^VkZ^cZVVo{^kZRRg9VZV^ckZRg9g9VwZg9o{RVNsZc9{{{s{w{{{{{{1kZckZckZc^cckZZg9^o{c^ZcsZ^kZ^^g9^c^ckZo{Zo{^g9^ccZZg9cscc^o{cw^c s^^kZcZg9cscZ^g9wi{wg9{w{wssw{{w{wsww{wsw{s{o{{ws{{ws{{sw{o{o{w{#g9^g9wkZwZkZsccskZco{{^kZ{g9kZo{g9kZg9kZso{kZg9g9sg9o{co{g9s^o{wg9g9kZkZg9kZo{o{kZkZg9^skZo{g9so{wg9{5skZkZwo{wkZkZwscwkZkZo{wo{kZwkZ^kZo{kZo{o{skZo{wkZwo{kZkZsskZkZwo{o{wcco{skZkZo{g9{o{wo{wo{o{kZwo{wkZ{wwkZwwo{sswwskZ{swg9w{wsswwsw ss{{o{sws{o{skZswskZws wsswsswkZwsskZ^cg9Zccsc^sccwg9Zcg9g9cg9kZkZo{g9csscZZcw^kZg9c^skZg9cg9^scg9sccg9gswo{wwsw{{{wsw{o{g9swwo{ sw{s{{cZVRVZRZsZkZg93^VV^VVkZ^ckZNsVg9^cZVVsRZVVZkZVR^ZR^VcZZ^V^^VV^V^g9ZR^RV{Vws{wwww{{s{sw{sww^VRkZVRRZg9Z^VZ^cVR-Z^s^ZsRVZg9Vo{RVVZkZkZ^VZVg9{cV^o{Z^s^Zo{RZ^VRV^^ZNsZw{s{{g9g9c^^g9o{wwsws{w5 {{{{w{w{{{{{w=g9^kZZ^ZVZkZRwZo{g9^RZ^R^g9Vg9^ZVs{{{w{ ՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|  'FHSQ,  Title( 8@ _PID_HLINKS'AE[ mailto:mr.riverso@gmail.comE[ mailto:mr.riverso@gmail.com)qOhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204257504577151212467142838.htmlthttp://www.nj.com/ledger-dalessandro/index.ssf/2013/03/lawsuit_filed_by_former_nets_forward_ed_obannon_threatens_ncaas_economic_model.htmlbXhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2013/04/01/the-money-behind-the-ncaa-final-four/  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:<=>?@ABDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdfghijkloRoot Entry FlbSGqData ;1TableCWordDocument4tSummaryInformation(SD#DocumentSummaryInformation8eCompObj` F Microsoft Word 97-2004 DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8