ࡱ>  s jbjb vkkF`]XXXD840D N!*"*"*"*"#b$T/^0^0^0^0^0^0,240X$*"*"$$0**"*"D***$ *",*"/$/**/\/SJ/4Uv'/European cooperation for Accreditation of LaboratoriesPublication ReferenceEAL-R2 Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to harmonise evaluation of uncertainty of measurement within EAL, to set up, in addition to the general requirements of EAL-R1, the specific demands in reporting uncertainty of measurement on calibration certificates issued by accredited laboratories and to assist accreditation bodies with a coherent assignment of best measurement capability to calibration laboratories accredited by them. As the rules laid down in this document are in compliance with the recommendations of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, published by seven international organisations concerned with standardisation and metrology, the implementation of EAL-R2 will also foster the global acceptance of European results of measurement. Authorship This document has been drafted by EAL Task Force for revision of WECC Doc. 19-1990 on behalf of the EAL Committee 2 (Calibration and Testing Activities). It comprises a thorough revision of WECC Doc. 19-1990 which it replaces. Official language The text may be translated into other languages as required. The English language version remains the definitive version. Copyright The copyright of this text is held by EAL. The text may not be copied for resale. Further information For further information about this publication, contact your National member of EAL: Calibration National memberTesting National memberAustriaBMwABMwABelgiumBKO/OBEBELTESTDenmarkDANAKDANAKFinlandFINASFINASFranceCOFRACCOFRACGermanyDKDDARGreeceMinistry of CommerceELOTIcelandISACISACIrelandNABNABItalySITSINALNetherlandsRvARvANorwayNANAPortugalIPQIPQSpainENACENACSwedenSWEDACSWEDACSwitzerlandSASSASUnited KingdomUKASUKAS Contents SectionPage1Introduction42Outline and definitions53Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement of input estimates64Calculation of the standard uncertainty of the output estimate95Expanded uncertainty of measurement126Statement of uncertainty of measurement in calibration certificates137Step-by-step procedure for calculating the uncertainty of measurement148References15Appendices16 1 Introduction 1.1 This document sets down the principles of and the requirements on the evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement in calibration and the statement of this uncertainty in calibration certificates. The treatment is kept on a general level to suit all fields of calibration. The method outlined may have to be supplemented by more specific advice for different fields, to make the information more readily applicable. In developing such supplementary guidelines the general principles stated in this document should be followed to ensure harmonisation between the different fields. 1.2 The treatment in this document is in accordance with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, first published in 1993 in the name of BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML [ref. 1]. But whereas [ref.1] establishes general rules for evaluating and expressing uncertainty in measurement that can be followed in most fields of physical measurements, this document concentrates on the method most suitable for the measurements in calibration laboratories and describes an unambiguous and harmonised way of evaluating and stating the uncertainty of measurement. It comprises the following subjects: definitions basic to the document; methods for evaluating the uncertainty of measurement of input quantities; relationship between the uncertainty of measurement of the output quantity and the uncertainty of measurement of the input quantities; expanded uncertainty of measurement of the output quantity; statement of the uncertainty of measurement; a step by step procedure for calculating the uncertainty of measurement. Worked out examples showing the application of the method outlined here to specific measurement problems in different fields will be given in supplements. Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement is also addressed in several of the EAL documents which provide guidance on calibration methods, some of these documents containing specific worked out examples. 1.3 Within EAL the best measurement capability (always referring to a particular quantity, viz. the measurand) is defined as the smallest uncertainty of measurement that a laboratory can achieve within its scope of accreditation, when performing more or less routine calibrations of nearly ideal measurement standards intended to define, realize, conserve or reproduce a unit of that quantity or one or more of its values, or when performing more or less routine calibrations of nearly ideal measuring instruments designed for the measurement of that quantity. The assessment of best measurement capability of accredited calibration laboratories has to be based on the method described in this document but shall normally be supported or confirmed by experimental evidence. To assist accreditation bodies with the assessment of the best measurement capability some further explanations are given in AnnexA. 2 Outline and definitions Note: Terms of special relevance to the context of the main text are written in bold when they appear for the first time in this document. Appendix B contains a glossary of these terms together with references 2.1 The statement of the result of a measurement is complete only if it contains both the value attributed to the measurand and the uncertainty of measurement associated with that value. In this document all quantities which are not exactly known are treated as random variables, including the influence quantities which may affect the measured value. 2.2 The uncertainty of measurement is a parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand [ref. 2]. In this document the shorthand term uncertainty is used for uncertainty of measurement if there is no risk of misunderstanding. For typical sources of uncertainty in a measurement see the list given in AnnexC. 2.3 The measurands are the particular quantities subject to measurement. In calibration one usually deals with only one measurand or output quantity Y that depends upon a number of input quantities Xi (i = 1, 2 ,, N) according to the functional relationship Y = f(X1, X2, , XN ) (2.1) The model function f represents the procedure of the measurement and the method of evaluation. It describes how values of the output quantity Y are obtained from values of the input quantities Xi. In most cases it will be an analytical expression, but it may also be a group of such expressions which include corrections and correction factors for systematic effects, thereby leading to a more complicated relationship that is not written down as one function explicitly. Further, f may be determined experimentally, or exist only as a computer algorithm that must be evaluated numerically, or it may be a combination of all of these. 2.4 The set of input quantities Xi may be grouped into two categories according to the way in which the value of the quantity and its associated uncertainty have been determined: (a) quantities whose estimate and associated uncertainty are directly determined in the current measurement. These values may be obtained, for example, from a single observation, repeated observations, or judgement based on experience. They may involve the determination of corrections to instrument readings as well as corrections for influence quantities, such as ambient temperature, barometric pressure or humidity; (b) quantities whose estimate and associated uncertainty are brought into the measurement from external sources, such as quantities associated with calibrated measurement standards, certified reference materials or reference data obtained from handbooks. 2.5 An estimate of the measurand Y, the output estimate denoted by y, is obtained from equation(2.1) using input estimates xi for the values of the input quantitiesXi EMBED Equation.2 (2.2) It is understood that the input values are best estimates that have been corrected for all effects significant for the model. If not, the necessary corrections have been introduced as separate input quantities. 2.6 For a random variable the variance of its distribution or the positive square root of the variance, called standard deviation, is used as a measure of the dispersion of values. The standard uncertainty of measurement associated with the output estimate or measurement result y, denoted by u(y), is the standard deviation of the measurand Y. It is to be determined from the estimates xi of the input quantities Xi and their associated standard uncertainties u(xi). The standard uncertainty associated with an estimate has the same dimension as the estimate. In some cases the relative standard uncertainty of measurement may be appropriate which is the standard uncertainty of measurement associated with an estimate divided by the modulus of that estimate and is therefore dimensionless. This concept cannot be used if the estimate equals zero. 3 Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement of input estimates 3.1 General considerations 3.1.1 The uncertainty of measurement associated with the input estimates is evaluated according to either a 'TypeA' or a 'TypeB' method of evaluation. The TypeA evaluation of standard uncertainty is the method of evaluating the uncertainty by the statistical analysis of a series of observations. In this case the standard uncertainty is the experimental standard deviation of the mean that follows from an averaging procedure or an appropriate regression analysis. The TypeB evaluation of standard uncertainty is the method of evaluating the uncertainty by means other than the statistical analysis of a series of observations. In this case the evaluation of the standard uncertainty is based on some other scientific knowledge. Note: There are occasions, seldom met in calibration, when all possible values of a quantity lie on one side of a single limit value. A well known case is the so-called cosine error. For the treatment of such special cases, see ref. 1. 3.2 TypeA evaluation of standard uncertainty 3.2.1 The TypeA evaluation of standard uncertainty can be applied when several independent observations have been made for one of the input quantities under the same conditions of measurement. If there is sufficient resolution in the measurement process there will be an observable scatter or spread in the values obtained. 3.2.2 Assume that the repeatedly measured input quantity Xi is the quantity Q. With n statistically independent observations (n > 1), the estimate of the quantity Q is  EMBED Equation.2 , the arithmetic mean or the average of the individual observed values qj (j = 1, 2, , n) EMBED Equation.2 (3.1) The uncertainty of measurement associated with the estimate  EMBED Equation.2  is evaluated according to one of the following methods: (a) An estimate of the variance of the underlying probability distribution is the experimental variance s(q) of values qj that is given by EMBED Equation.2 (3.2) Its (positive) square root is termed experimental standard deviation. The best estimate of the variance of the arithmetic mean  EMBED Equation.2  is the experimental variance of the mean given by EMBED Equation.2 (3.3) Its (positive) square root is termed experimental standard deviation of the mean. The standard uncertainty  EMBED Equation.2  associated with the input estimate  EMBED Equation.2  is the experimental standard deviation of the mean EMBED Equation.2 (3.4) Warning: Generally, when the number n of repeated measurements is low (n < 10), the reliability of a TypeA evaluation of standard uncertainty, as expressed by equation (3.4), has to be considered. If the number of observations cannot be increased, other means of evaluating the standard uncertainty given in the text have to be considered. (b) For a measurement that is well-characterised and under statistical control a combined or pooled estimate of variance  EMBED Equation.2  may be available that characterises the dispersion better than the estimated standard deviation obtained from a limited number of observations. If in such a case the value of the input quantity Q is determined as the arithmetic mean  EMBED Equation.2  of a small number n of independent observations, the variance of the mean may be estimated by EMBED Equation.2 (3.5) The standard uncertainty is deduced from this value by equation(3.4). 3.3 TypeB evaluation of standard uncertainty 3.3.1 The TypeB evaluation of standard uncertainty is the evaluation of the uncertainty associated with an estimate xi of an input quantity Xi by means other than the statistical analysis of a series of observations. The standard uncertainty u(xi) is evaluated by scientific judgement based on all available information on the possible variability of Xi. Values belonging to this category may be derived from previous measurement data; experience with or general knowledge of the behaviour and properties of relevant materials and instruments; manufacturers specifications; data provided in calibration and other certificates; uncertainties assigned to reference data taken from handbooks. 3.3.2 The proper use of the available information for a TypeB evaluation of standard uncertainty of measurement calls for insight based on experience and general knowledge. It is a skill that can be learned with practice. A well-based TypeB evaluation of standard uncertainty can be as reliable as a TypeA evaluation of standard uncertainty, especially in a measurement situation where a TypeA evaluation is based only on a comparatively small number of statistically independent observations. The following cases must be discerned: (a) When only a single value is known for the quantity Xi, e.g. a single measured value, a resultant value of a previous measurement, a reference value from the literature, or a correction value, this value will be used for xi. The standard uncertainty u(xi) associated with xi is to be adopted where it is given. Otherwise it has to be calculated from unequivocal uncertainty data. If data of this kind are not available, the uncertainty has to be evaluated on the basis of experience. (b) When a probability distribution can be assumed for the quantity Xi, based on theory or experience, then the appropriate expectation or expected value and the square root of the variance of this distribution have to be taken as the estimate xi and the associated standard uncertainty u(xi), respectively. (c) If only upper and lower limits a+ and a can be estimated for the value of the quantity Xi (e.g. manufacturers specifications of a measuring instrument, a temperature range, a rounding or truncation error resulting from automated data reduction), a probability distribution with constant probability density between these limits (rectangular probability distribution) has to be assumed for the possible variability of the input quantity Xi. According to case (b) above this leads to EMBED Equation.2 (3.6) for the estimated value and EMBED Equation.2 (3.7) for the square of the standard uncertainty. If the difference between the limiting values is denoted by 2a, equation(3.7) yields EMBED Equation.2 (3.8) The rectangular distribution is a reasonable description in probability terms of ones inadequate knowledge about the input quantity Xi in the absence of any other information than its limits of variability. But if it is known that values of the quantity in question near the centre of the variability interval are more likely than values close to the limits, a triangular or normal distribution may be a better model. On the other hand, if values close to the limits are more likely than values near the centre, a U-shaped distribution may be more appropriate. 4 Calculation of the standard uncertainty of the output estimate 4.1 For uncorrelated input quantities the square of the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate y is given by EMBED Equation.2 (4.1) Note: There are cases, seldom occurring in calibration, where the model function is strongly non-linear or some of the sensitivity coefficients [see equation (4.2) and (4.3)] vanish and higher order terms have to be included into equation (4.1). For a treatment of such special cases see ref. 1. The quantity ui(y) (i = 1, 2, , N) is the contribution to the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate y resulting from the standard uncertainty associated with the input estimate xi ui(y) = ciu(xi) (4.2) where ci is the sensitivity coefficient associated with the input estimate xi, i.e. the partial derivative of the model function f with respect to Xi, evaluated at the input estimates xi, EMBED Equation.2 (4.3) 4.2 The sensitivity coefficient ci describes the extent to which the output estimate y is influenced by variations of the input estimate xi. It can be evaluated from the model function f by equation(4.3) or by using numerical methods, i.e. by calculating the change in the output estimate y due to a change in the input estimate xi of +u(xi) and -u(xi) and taking as the value of ci the resulting difference in y divided by 2u(xi). Sometimes it may be more appropriate to find the change in the output estimate y from an experiment by repeating the measurement at e.g. xi ( u(xi). 4.3 Whereas u(xi) is always positive, the contribution ui(y) according to equation(4.2) is either positive or negative, depending on the sign of the sensitivity coefficient ci. The sign of ui(y) has to be taken into account in the case of correlated input quantities, see equation(D4) of AnnexD. 4.4 If the model function f is a sum or difference of the input quantities Xi EMBED Equation.2 (4.4) the output estimate according to equation(2.2) is given by the corresponding sum or difference of the input estimates EMBED Equation.2 (4.5) whereas the sensitivity coefficients equal pi and equation(4.1) converts to EMBED Equation.2 (4.6) 4.5 If the model function f is a product or quotient of the input quantities Xi EMBED Equation.2 (4.7) the output estimate again is the corresponding product or quotient of the input estimates EMBED Equation.2 (4.8) The sensitivity coefficients equal piy/xi in this case and an expression analogous to equation(4.6) is obtained from equation(4.1), if relative standard uncertainties w(y)= u(y)/(y( and w(xi) = u(xi)/(xi( are used, EMBED Equation.2 (4.9) 4.6 If two input quantities Xi and Xk are correlated to some degree, i.e. if they are mutually dependent in one way or another, their covariance also has to be considered as a contribution to the uncertainty. See AnnexD for how this has to be done. The ability to take into account the effect of correlations depends on the knowledge of the measurement process and on the judgement of mutual dependency of the input quantities. In general, it should be kept in mind that neglecting correlations between input quantities can lead to an incorrect evaluation of the standard uncertainty of the measurand. 4.7 The covariance associated with the estimates of two input quantities Xi and Xk may be taken to be zero or treated as insignificant if (a) the input quantities Xi and Xk are independent, for example, because they have been repeatedly but not simultaneously observed in different independent experiments or because they represent resultant quantities of different evaluations that have been made independently, or if (b) either of the input quantities Xi and Xk can be treated as constant, or if (c) investigation gives no information indicating the presence of correlation between the input quantities Xi and Xk. Sometimes correlations can be eliminated by a proper choice of the model function. 4.8 The uncertainty analysis for a measurement sometimes called the uncertainty budget of the measurement should include a list of all sources of uncertainty together with the associated standard uncertainties of measurement and the methods of evaluating them. For repeated measurements the number n of observations also has to be stated. For the sake of clarity, it is recommended to present the data relevant to this analysis in the form of a table. In this table all quantities should be referenced by a physical symbol Xi or a short identifier. For each of them at least the estimate xi, the associated standard uncertainty of measurement u(xi), the sensitivity coefficient ci and the different uncertainty contributions ui(y) should be specified. The dimension of each of the quantities should also be stated with the numerical values given in the table. 4.9 A formal example of such an arrangement is given as Table 4.1 applicable for the case of uncorrelated input quantities. The standard uncertainty associated with the measurement result u(y) given in the bottom right corner of the table is the root sum square of all the uncertainty contributions in the outer right column. The grey part of the table is not filled in. Table 4.1: Schematic of an ordered arrangement of the quantities, estimates, standard uncertainties, sensitivity coefficients and uncertainty contributions used in the uncertainty analysis of a measurement. Quantity XiEstimate xiStandard uncertainty u(xi)Sensitivity coefficient ciContribution to the standard uncertainty ui(y)X1x1u(x1)c1u1(y)X2x2u(x2)c2u2(y):::::XNxNu(xN)cNuN(y)Yyu(y)5 Expanded uncertainty of measurement 5.1 Within EAL it has been decided that calibration laboratories accredited by members of the EAL shall state an expanded uncertainty of measurement U, obtained by multiplying the standard uncertainty u(y) of the output estimate y by a coverage factor k, U = ku(y) (5.1) In cases where a normal (Gaussian) distribution can be attributed to the measurand and the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate has sufficient reliability, the standard coverage factor k = 2 shall be used. The assigned expanded uncertainty corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. These conditions are fulfilled in the majority of cases encountered in calibration work. 5.2 The assumption of a normal distribution cannot always be easily confirmed experimentally. However, in the cases where several (i.e.N ( 3) uncertainty components, derived from well-behaved probability distributions of independent quantities, e.g. normal distributions or rectangular distributions, contribute to the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate by comparable amounts, the conditions of the Central Limit Theorem are met and it can be assumed to a high degree of approximation that the distribution of the output quantity is normal. 5.3 The reliability of the standard uncertainty assigned to the output estimate is determined by its effective degrees of freedom (see AnnexE). However, the reliability criterion is always met if none of the uncertainty contributions is obtained from a TypeA evaluation based on less than ten repeated observations. 5.4 If one of these conditions (normality or sufficient reliability) is not fulfilled, the standard coverage factor k = 2 can yield an expanded uncertainty corresponding to a coverage probability of less than 95%. In these cases, in order to ensure that a value of the expanded uncertainty is quoted corresponding to the same coverage probability as in the normal case, other procedures have to be followed. The use of approximately the same coverage probability is essential whenever two results of measurement of the same quantity have to be compared, e.g. when evaluating the results of an inter-laboratory comparison or assessing compliance with a specification. 5.5 Even if a normal distribution can be assumed, it may still occur that the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate is of insufficient reliability. If, in this case, it is not expedient to increase the number n of repeated measurements or to use a TypeB evaluation instead of the TypeA evaluation of poor reliability, the method given in AnnexE should be used. 5.5 For the remaining cases, i.e. all cases where the assumption of a normal distribution cannot be justified, information on the actual probability distribution of the output estimate must be used to obtain a value of the coverage factor k that corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. 6 Statement of uncertainty of measurement in calibration certificates 6.1 In calibration certificates the complete result of the measurement consisting of the estimate y of the measurand and the associated expanded uncertainty U shall be given in the form (y ( U). To this an explanatory note must be added which in the general case should have the following content: The reported expanded uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty of measurement multiplied by the coverage factor k = 2, which for a normal distribution corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. The standard uncertainty of measurement has been determined in accordance with EAL Publication EAL-R2. 6.2 However, in cases where the procedure of AnnexE has been followed, the additional note should read as follows: The reported expanded uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty of measurement multiplied by the coverage factor k = XX, which for a t-distribution with (eff = YY effective degrees of freedom corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. The standard uncertainty of measurement has been determined in accordance with EAL Publication EAL-R2. 6.3 The numerical value of the uncertainty of measurement should be given to at most two significant figures. The numerical value of the measurement result should in the final statement normally be rounded to the least significant figure in the value of the expanded uncertainty assigned to the measurement result. For the process of rounding, the usual rules for rounding of numbers have to be used (for further details on rounding see ISO 31-0:1992, Annex B). However, if the rounding brings the numerical value of the uncertainty of measurement down by more than 5%, the rounded up value should be used. 7 Step-by-step procedure for calculating the uncertainty of measurement 7.1 The following is a guide to the use of this document in practice (cf. worked examples in Annex F and in separate supplementary documents): (a) Express in mathematical terms the dependence of the measurand (output quantity) Y on the input quantities Xi according to equation(2.1). In the case of a direct comparison of two standards the equation may be very simple, e.g. Y=X1+X2. (b) Identify and apply all significant corrections. (c) List all sources of uncertainty in the form of an uncertainty analysis in accordance with Section4. (d) Calculate the standard uncertainty  EMBED Equation.2  for repeatedly measured quantities in accordance with sub-section3.2. (e) For single values, e.g. resultant values of previous measurements, correction values or values from the literature, adopt the standard uncertainty where it is given or can be calculated according to paragraph3.3.2(a). Pay attention to the uncertainty representation used. If no data are available from which the standard uncertainty can be derived, state a value of u(xi) on the basis of scientific experience. (f) For input quantities for which the probability distribution is known or can be assumed, calculate the expectation and the standard uncertainty u(xi) according to paragraph3.3.2(b). If only upper and lower limits are given or can be estimated, calculate the standard uncertainty u(xi) in accordance with paragraph3.3.2(c). (g) Calculate for each input quantity Xi the contribution ui(y) to the uncertainty associated with the output estimate resulting from the input estimate xi according to equations (4.2) and (4.3) and sum their squares as described in equation(4.1) to obtain the square of the standard uncertainty u(y) of the measurand. If input quantities are known to be correlated, apply the procedure given in AnnexD. (h) Calculate the expanded uncertainty U by multiplying the standard uncertainty u(y) associated with the output estimate by a coverage factor k chosen in accordance with Section5. (i) Report the result of the measurement comprising the estimate y of the measurand, the associated expanded uncertainty U and the coverage factor k in the calibration certificate in accordance with Section6. 8 References [1] Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, first edition, 1993, corrected and reprinted 1995, International Organization for Standardization (Geneva, Switzerland). [2] International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology, second edition, 1993, International Organization for Standardization (Geneva, Switzerland). [3] International Standard ISO 3534-1, Statistics - Vocabulary and symbols - Part I: Probability and General Statistical Terms, first edition, 1993, International Organization for Standardization (Geneva, Switzerland). AppendixA Comments on the assessment of best measurement capability A1 Best measurement capability (see Section1 of the main text) is one of the parameters that is used to define the scope of an accredited calibration laboratory, the others being physical quantity, calibration method or type of instrument to be calibrated and measurement range. Best measurement capability is normally stated in the accreditation schedule or in other documentation that supports either the decision on accreditation or the accreditation certificate which in many cases is issued as evidence of accreditation. Occasionally it is stated both in the accreditation schedule and in the supporting documents. Best measurement capability is one of the essential pieces of information to be found in directories of accredited laboratories that are regularly issued by accreditation bodies and is used by potential customers to accredited laboratories to judge the suitability of a laboratory to carry out particular calibration work at the laboratory or on site. A2 To make it possible to compare the capabilities of different calibration laboratories, in particular laboratories accredited by different accreditation bodies, the statement of best measurement capability needs to be harmonised. To facilitate this, some explanations are given below to the term best measurement capability, based on its definition as reported in the main text. A3 With 'more or less routine calibrations' is meant that the laboratory shall be able to achieve the stated capability in the normal work that it performs under its accreditation. Obviously there are instances where the laboratory would be able to do better as a result of extensive investigations and additional precautions but these cases are not covered by the definition of best measurement capability, unless it is the outspoken policy of the laboratory to perform such scientific investigations (in which case these become the 'more or less routine' type calibrations of the laboratory). A4 Inclusion of the qualifier 'nearly ideal' in the definition means that best measurement capability should not be dependent on the characteristics of the device to be calibrated. Inherent in the concept of being nearly ideal is thus that there should be no significant contribution to the uncertainty of measurement attributable to physical effects that can be ascribed to imperfections of the device to be calibrated. However, it should be understood that such a device should be available. If it is established that, in a particular case, even the most 'ideal' available device contributes to the uncertainty of measurement, this contribution shall be included in the determination of the best measurement capability and a statement should be made that the best measurement capability refers to calibration of that type of device. A5 The definition of best measurement capability implies that within its accreditation a laboratory is not entitled to claim a smaller uncertainty of measurement than the best measurement capability. This means that the laboratory shall be required to state a larger uncertainty than that corresponding to the best measurement capability whenever it is established that the actual calibration process adds significantly to the uncertainty of measurement. Typically the equipment under calibration may give a contribution. Obviously the actual uncertainty of measurement can never be smaller than the best measurement capability. When stating the actual uncertainty, the laboratory shall be asked to apply the principles of the present document. A6 It should be pointed out that according to the definition of best measurement capability the concept is applicable only to results for which the laboratory claims its status as accredited laboratory. Thus, strictly speaking the term is of an administrative character and does not necessarily need to reflect the real technical capability of the laboratory. It should be possible for a laboratory to apply for accreditation with a larger uncertainty of measurement than its technical capability if the laboratory has internal reasons for doing so. Such internal reasons usually involve cases where the real capability has to be held in confidence to external customers, e.g. when doing research and development work or when providing service to special customers. The policy of the accreditation body should be to grant accreditation on any applied level if the laboratory is capable of carrying out calibrations on that level. (This consideration refers not only to the best measurement capability but to all parameters that define the scope of a calibration laboratory.) A7 Assessment of best measurement capability is the task of the accreditation body. The estimation of the uncertainty of measurement that defines the best measurement capability should follow the procedure laid down in the present document, with the exception of the case covered in the previous sub-section. The best measurement capability shall be stated to the same level as required for calibration certificates, i.e. in the form of an expanded uncertainty of measurement, normally with coverage factor k=2. (Only in those exceptional cases where the existence of a normal distribution cannot be assumed or the assessment is based on limited data, the best measurement capability has to be stated to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. See Section5 of the main text.) A8 All components contributing significantly to the uncertainty of measurement shall be taken into account when evaluating the best measurement capability. The evaluation of the contributions that are known to vary with time or with any other physical quantity can be based on limits of possible variations assumed to occur under normal working conditions. For instance, if the used working standard is known to drift, the contribution caused by the drift between subsequent calibrations of the standard has to be taken into account when estimating the uncertainty contribution of the working standard. A9 In some fields the uncertainty of measurement may depend on some additional parameter, e.g. frequency of applied voltage when calibrating standard resistors. Such additional parameters shall be stated together with the physical quantity in question and the best measurement capability specified for the additional parameters. Often this can be done by giving the best measurement capability as a function of these parameters. A10 The best measurement capability should normally be stated numerically. Where the best measurement capability is a function of the quantity to which it refers (or any other parameter) it should be given in analytical form but in this case it may be illustrative to support the statement by a diagram. It should always be unequivocally clear whether the best measurement capability is given in absolute or relative terms. (Usually the inclusion of the relevant unit gives the necessary explanation but in case of dimensionless quantities a separate statement is needed.) A11 Although the assessment should be based on the procedures of this document, in the main text there is the requirement that the assessment normally shall be 'supported or confirmed by experimental evidence'. The meaning of this requirement is that the accreditation body should not rely on an evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement only. Interlaboratory comparisons that substantiate the evaluation have to be carried out under the supervision of the accreditation body or on its behalf. AppendixB Glossary of some relevant terms B1 arithmetic mean ([ref.3] term2.26) The sum of values divided by the number of values B2 best measurement capability (Section1) The smallest uncertainty of measurement that a laboratory can achieve within its scope of accreditation, when performing more or less routine calibrations of nearly ideal measurement standards intended to define, realise, conserve or reproduce a unit of that quantity or one or more of its values, or when performing more or less routine calibrations of nearly ideal measuring instruments designed for the measurement of that quantity. B3 correlation ([ref.3] term1.13) The relationship between two or several random variables within a distribution of two or more random variables B4 correlation coefficient (from [ref.1] SectionC.3.6) The measure of the relative mutual dependence of two random variables, equal to the ratio of their covariance to the positive square root of the product of their variances B5 covariance (from [ref.1] SectionC.3.4) The measure of the mutual dependence of two random variables, equal to the expectation of the product of the deviations of two random variables from their respective expectations B6 coverage factor ([ref.1] term2.3.6) A numerical factor used as a multiplier of the standard uncertainty of measurement in order to obtain an expanded uncertainty of measurement B7 coverage probability (from [ref.1] term2.3.5, NOTE 1) The fraction, usually large, of the distribution of values that as a result of a measurement could reasonably be attributed to the measurand B8 experimental standard deviation ([ref.2] term3.8) The positive square root of the experimental variance. B9 expanded uncertainty ([ref.1] term2.3.5) A quantity defining an interval about the result of a measurement that may be expected to encompass a large fraction of the distribution of values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand. B10 experimental variance (from [ref.1] Section4.2.2) The quantity characterising the dispersion of the results of a series of n observations of the same measurand given by equation(3.2) in the text. B11 input estimate (from [ref.1] Section 4.1.4) The estimate of an input quantity used in the evaluation of the result of a measurement. B12 input quantity (from [ref.1] Section 4.1.2) A quantity on which the measurand depends, taken into account in the process of evaluating the result of a measurement. B13 measurand ([ref.2] term2.6) The particular quantity subject to measurement. B14 output estimate (from [ref.1] Section4.1.4) The result of a measurement calculated from the input estimates by the model function. B15 output quantity (from [ref.1] Section4.1.2) The quantity that represents the measurand in the evaluation of a measurement. B16 pooled estimate of variance (from [ref.1] Section4.2.4) An estimate of the experimental variance obtained from long series of observations of the same measurand in well-characterised measurements under statistical control. B17 probability distribution ([ref.3] term1.3) A function giving the probability that a random variable takes any given value or belongs to a given set of values B18 random variable ([ref.3] term1.2) A variable that may take any of the values of a specified set of values and with which is associated a probability distribution. B19 relative standard uncertainty of measurement (from [ref.1] Section5.1.6) The standard uncertainty of a quantity divided by the estimate of that quantity. B20 sensitivity coefficient associated with an input estimate (from [ref. 1] Section5.1.3) The differential change in the output estimate generated by a differential change in an input estimate divided by the change in that input estimate. B21 standard deviation (from [ref.3] term1.23) The positive square root of the variance of a random variable. B22 standard uncertainty of measurement ([ref.1] term2.3.1) The uncertainty of measurement expressed as the standard deviation B23 Type A evaluation method ([ref.1] term2.3.2) The method of evaluation of uncertainty of measurement by the statistical analysis of series of observations B24 Type B evaluation method ([ref.1] term2.3.3) The method of evaluation of uncertainty of measurement by means other than the statistical analysis of series of observations. B25 uncertainty of measurement ([ref.2] term3.9) A parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand. B26 variance (from [ref.3] term1.22) The expectation of the square of the deviation of a random variable about its expectation. AppendixC Sources of uncertainty of measurement C1 The uncertainty of the result of a measurement reflects the lack of complete knowledge of the value of the measurand. Complete knowledge requires an infinite amount of information. Phenomena that contribute to the uncertainty and thus to the fact that the result of a measurement cannot be characterised by a unique value, are called sources of uncertainty. In practice, there are many possible sources of uncertainty in a measurement [ref.1], including: (a) incomplete definition of the measurand; (b) imperfect realisation of the definition of the measurand; (c) non-representative sampling the sample measured may not represent the defined measurand; (d) inadequately known effects of environmental conditions or imperfect measurements of these; (e) personal bias in reading analogue instruments; (f) finite instrument resolution or discrimination threshold; (g) inexact values of measurement standards and reference materials; (h) inexact values of constants and other parameters obtained from external sources and used in the data-reduction algorithm; (i) approximations and assumptions incorporated in the measurement method and procedure; (j) variations in repeated observations of the measurand under apparently identical conditions. C2 These sources are not necessarily independent. Some of the sources (a) to (i) may contribute to (j). AppendixD Correlated input quantities D1 If two input quantities Xi and Xk are known to be correlated to some extent i.e. if they are dependent on each other in one way or another the covariance associated with the two estimates xi and xk EMBED Equation.2 (D.1) has to be considered as an additional contribution to the uncertainty. The degree of correlation is characterised by the correlation coefficient r(xi, xk) (where i ( k and  EMBED Equation.2 ). D2 In the case of n independent pairs of simultaneously repeated observations of two quantities P and Q the covariance associated with the arithmetic means  EMBED Equation.2  and  EMBED Equation.2  is given by EMBED Equation.2 (D.2) and by substitution r can be calculated from equation(D.1). D3 For influence quantities any degree of correlation has to be based on experience. When there is correlation, equation(4.1) has to be replaced by EMBED Equation.2 (D.3) where ci and ck are the sensitivity coefficients defined by equation(4.3) or EMBED Equation.2 (D.4) with the contributions ui(y) to the standard uncertainty of the output estimate y resulting from the standard uncertainty of the input estimate xi given by equation(4.2). It should be noted that the second summation of terms in equation(D.3) or (D.4) may become negative in sign. D4 In practice, input quantities are often correlated because the same physical reference standard, measuring instrument, reference datum, or even measurement method having a significant uncertainty is used in the evaluation of their values. Without loss of generality, suppose that two input quantities X1 and X2 estimated by x1 and x2 depend on the set of independent variables Ql (l = 1,2,(,L)  EMBED Equation.2  (D.5) although some of these variables may not necessarily appear in both functions. The estimates x1 and x2 of the input quantities will be correlated to some extent, even if the estimates ql (l = 1,2,,L) are uncorrelated. In that case the covariance u(x1,x2) associated with the estimates x1 and x2 is given by  EMBED Equation.2  (D.6) where  EMBED Equation.2  and  EMBED Equation.2  are the sensitivity coefficients derived from the functions g1 and g2 in analogy to equation(4.3). Because only those terms contribute to the sum for which the sensitivity coefficients do not vanish, the covariance is zero if no variable is common to functions g1 and g2. The correlation coefficient r(x1,x2) associated with the estimates x1 and x2 is determined from equation(D.6) together with equation(D.1). D5 The following example demonstrates correlations which exist between values attributed to two artefact standards that are calibrated against the same reference standard. Measurement Problem The two standards X1 and X2 are compared with the reference standard QS by means of a measuring system capable of determining a difference z in their values with an associated standard uncertainty u(z). The value qS of the reference standard is known with standard uncertainty u(qS). Mathematical Model The estimates x1 and x2 depend on the value qS of the reference standard and the observed differences z1 and z2 according to the relations  EMBED Equation.2  (D.7) Standard uncertainties and covariances The estimates z1, z2 and qS are supposed to be uncorrelated because they have been determined in different measurements. The standard uncertainties are calculated from equation(4.4) and the covariance associated with the estimates x1 and x2 is calculated from equation(D.6), assuming that u(z1) = u(z2) = u(z),  EMBED Equation.2  (D.8) The correlation coefficient deduced from these results is  EMBED Equation.2  (D.9) Its value ranges from 0 to +1 depending on the ratio of the standard uncertainties u(qS) and u(z). D6 The case described by equation(D.5) is an occasion where the inclusion of correlation in the evaluation of the standard uncertainty of the measurand can be avoided by a proper choice of the model function. Introducing directly the independent variables  EMBED Equation.2  by replacing the original variables X1 and X2 in the model function f in accordance with the transformation equations(D.5) gives a new model function that does not contain the correlated variables X1 and X2 any longer. D7 There are cases however, where correlation between two input quantities X1 and X2 cannot be avoided, e.g. using the same measuring instrument or the same reference standard when determining the input estimates x1 and x2 but where transformation equations to new independent variables are not available. If furthermore the degree of correlation is not exactly known it may be useful to assess the maximum influence this correlation can have by an upper bound estimate of the standard uncertainty of the measurand which in the case that other correlations have not to be taken into account takes the form EMBED Equation.2 (D.10) with ur(y) being the contribution to the standard uncertainty of all the remaining input quantities assumed to be uncorrelated. Note: Equation (D.10) is easily generalised to cases of one or several groups with two or more correlated input quantities. In this case a respective worst case sum has to be introduced into equation (D.10) for each group of correlated quantities. AnnexE Coverage factors derived from effective degrees of freedom. E1 To estimate the value of a coverage factor k corresponding to a specified coverage probability requires that the reliability of the standard uncertainty u(y) of the output estimate  EMBED Equation.2  is taken into account. That means taking into account how well u(y) estimates the standard deviation associated with the result of the measurement. For an estimate of the standard deviation of a normal distribution, the degrees of freedom of this estimate, which depends on the size of the sample on which it is based, is a measure of the reliability. Similarly, a suitable measure of the reliability of the standard uncertainty associated with an output estimate is its effective degrees of freedom (eff ,which is approximated by an appropriate combination of the effective degrees of freedom of its different uncertainty contributions ui(y). E2 The procedure for calculating an appropriate coverage factor k when the conditions of the Central Limit Theorem are met comprises the following three steps: (a) Obtain the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate according to the step by step procedure given in Section7. (b) Estimate the effective degrees of freedom (eff of the standard uncertainty u(y) associated with the output estimate y from the Welch-Satterthwaite formula  EMBED Equation.2  , (E.1) where the ui(y) (i=1,2,(,N), defined in equation(4.2), are the contributions to the standard uncertainty associated with the output estimate y resulting from the standard uncertainty associated with the input estimate xi which are assumed to be mutually statistically independent, and (i is the effective degrees of freedom of the standard uncertainty contribution ui(y). For a standard uncertainty u(q) obtained from a TypeA evaluation as discussed in sub-section3.1, the degrees of freedom are given by (i=n-1. It is more problematic to associate degrees of freedom with a standard uncertainty u(xi) obtained from a TypeB evaluation. However, it is common practice to carry out such evaluations in a manner that ensures that any underestimation is avoided. If, for example, lower and upper limits a and a+ are set, they are usually chosen in such a way that the probability of the quantity in question lying outside these limits is in fact extremely small. Under the assumption that this practice is followed, the degrees of freedom of the standard uncertainty u(xi) obtained from a TypeB may be taken to be (i ( (. (c) Obtain the coverage factor k from the table of values given as TableE.1 of this annex. This table is based on a t-distribution evaluated for a coverage probability of 95,45%. If (eff is not an integer, which will usually be the case, truncate (eff to the next lower integer. Table E.1: Coverage factors k for different effective degrees of freedom (eff. (eff 12345678102050(k13,974,533,312,872,652,522,432,372,282,132,052,00  PAGE  PAGE \* COMFORMATO 1 OF 27 EDITION 1 ( JUNE 1997 EDITION 1 ( JUNE 1997 PAGE  PAGE 1 OF  NUMPAGES \* ARBIGO \* COMFORMATO Error! Unknown switch argument. EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997EA-4/02PAGE  PAGE 1 OF 27 EAL-R2 ( EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CALIBRATION EAL-R2 ( EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CALIBRATION PAGE  PAGE 2 OF 27EA-4/02EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997 EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997EA-4/02PAGE  PAGE 3 OF 27 PAGE  PAGE 3 OF  NUMPAGES \* ARBIGO \* COMFORMATO Error! Unknown switch argument. EDITION 1 ( SEPTEMBER 1997 EAL-R2 ( EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CALIBRATION EAL-R2 ( EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CALIBRATION PAGE  PAGE 6 OF 27EA-4/02EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997 EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997EA-4/02PAGE  PAGE 7 OF 27 EAL-R2 ( EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CALIBRATION EAL-R2 ( EXPRESSION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CALIBRATION PAGE  PAGE 26 OF 27EA-4/02EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997 EDITION 1 ( APRIL 1997EA-4/02PAGE  PAGE 27 OF 27 89:IJOPVWX\]^hiyz)*?@ȼҲҦҐ~w~w~w~w~o6OJQJmH  @NHmH  @NHmH @mH  56mH 56CJ mH 5CJ@NHmH  5CJ@mH  5CJmH  5CJXmH 5CJXOJQJmH 5CJ$NHOJQJmH 5CJ$OJQJmH mH  5CJ(mH  5CJ$mH 5CJ(OJQJmH 56CJHmH j56CJHUmH +9:PWXYZ[\xd #$$40HU"$$ ,$ n$$4 U" d($  &$ %$9:PWXYZ[\- 7  ( ) 1 6 ; < D L T U ] c i j r x ~       ) - 1   b- 7 x<$<$< H    - 6 ( x y   # % g i & ) 7 : F I J K ABnoXYͼ@6NHNHNHmH 5mH 5OJQJmH mH 5CJOJQJmH  OJQJmH CJNHOJQJmH CJOJQJmH 6CJOJQJmH F  ( ) 1 6 ; < D L T U ] c i j r x ~  LdTTXD $$F l6z! d$<<$$      LDDT8 $$F l6z! d$<<$ ) - 1 2 8 = B C J Q X Y e i m n } HDXThd d$<<$ $$F l6z!1 2 8 = B C J Q X Y e i m n } # % & ( g i j l & ) * , 7 : ; F I J K Z 4BoaTT S  ] H $$G0"$x$x$hd # % & ( g i j l & tר(0 $$G " $$G "$x$x$& ) * , 7 : ; F I J K Z 4BoD<T & F T & FSdh $$G0"x$ $$G "$x$2Mz}kl>?!?@#)*234ScdefMN  \]  [ \ ] u"v"""0JI6CJEHH*0JIH*0JI0JI66H*5NHNH65NHV; "#=$Y$-%(((+,,.3/O//g0S$hxRZaST; "#=$Y$-%(((+,,.3/O//g00L1h1Y2u2355 6N678p8889;=9>!@=@Y@u@@AFCCD"DJEF)FFGGIsJJJTKpKKK)LELLLMMPPQRvRR+VWnXoX|XXXXXXXXXX T aRTZSZ"""+#,#########$$$$$4$5$:$;$<$=$>$N$O$P$Q$%%+%-%K%S%%%% &&&'&D&E&R&S&T&U&&&&&&&&&&&&&&''' 'p''k(l(((0)1)v)) *!*#*$*v*w***CJ @0JINH0JIj@2 EHUj@2 UV jU6H*56NHNHQ*h+i+++%-&---Q.R.S.d.e.l.m.p.q...............// /#/$/0/1/3/4/D/E/F/G/O////////////-0.0/0B0C0D0F0G0S06mH  5NHmH 5mH mH jJ5 EHUjJ5 UV0JIj@2 EHUj@2 UV5j>O2 EHUj>O2 UV jU6H*6NHNHAS0T0U0g0h0x0y0z0{000000111111!1B1L1M1]1^1_1`1h11111111122"2#2$2%22232Y2Z2j2|jC2 EHUjC2 UVjAC2 EHUjAC2 CJUVjC2 EHUjC2 CJUVjG2 EHUjG2 UV jUNH50JIjKV9 EHUmH jKV9 CJUVmH mH  jUmH mH  6H*mH 6mH /g00L1h1Y2u2355 6N678p8889;=9>!@=@Y@u@@AFCCRT & FSR$TZj2k2l2m2u2222233333(4C4D4E4X4Y4Z4[4z4{455E5F5Y5Z5[5\5p5q55555555566666666A7B7C7D7E7Ǽܷܳܩܳ6H*jV2 EHUjV2 UVjV2 EHUmH jV2 UVmH 6mH NHmH j3 EHUmH j3 UVmH  jUmH 5mH mH NH60JI jUj @2 EHUj @2 CJUV6E7777Z9[999S:T:;,;8;R;T;U;;;;<<<<<<</<0<1<=='=G=I=J=W=X====">$>%>&>'>(>7>9>E>J>O>\>]>^>c>d>e>>>>>>????? @!@"@2@3@j @2 UV jU @H*mH  6@mH  @NHmH  5@mH @mH NHmH  6H*mH 6mH 5mH mH NH6H*6G3@4@5@=@Y@Z@j@k@l@m@u@@@@@@@A A A AAAAAAAyCzCCCDDDDDD"D(DIEWEXEYEZE[E^E_EkElEEEEEEEFFFFFFFFFFFFFF@jy?2 EHUjy?2 UV6H*jN @2 EHUjN @2 CJUV6NHjU @2 EHUjU @2 CJUV0JI jUj @2 EHUDCD"DJEF)FFGGIsJJJTKpKKK)LELLLMMPPQRvRR+VRS$TaZSFFF F!F)F/F0F1F9FPFtFuFvFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFG!G"G#GVGWGGGGGG#H$HKHLHMHRHSHTHUHVH]H^H_H`HaH~HHHHHHHHHHII;II?I@IAIBICIDISITIUIVIWI~IIIIII jjj @2 EHUjj @2 UV jU50JI6H*6VIIIJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJTKUKeKfKgKhKpKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK&L'L(L)L*L:L;L'ACFI9$*$dD$ YwG @ W'g7"%'*w-G0358;W>'ACFI$*$ `0pTS XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYYYYYYY Y Y Y Y YYYYYYYYYYYYYY'Y(Y)Y*Y+Y,Y-Y.Y/Y0Y1Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y:Y=Y>Y?Y@YCY6@CJEHH*mH mH  @H*mH 6@H*mH  6@mH @mH @CJOJQJmH QXXXXXXYYXBXA$$Gr";$*$dD$ YwG @ W'g7"%'*w-G0358;W>'ACFIA$$Gr"XXYY Y YYYYYY Y"Y$Y&Y'Y*Y-Y3Y6Yvn:ŝoŞPҟ] RUTZS \Y Y YYYYYY Y"Y$Y&Y'Y*Y-Y3Y,XA$$Gr";$*$dD$ YwG @ W'g7"%'*w-G0358;W>'ACFI3Y6Y'ACFICYDYEYFYIYYZZ8Z9Z:Z;ZTZUZ[ZfZgZkZmZnZoZrZtZuZvZZ%[&[L[M[x[y[[[[[[[l\m\\\\\f]g]^ ^^^__````6a7aaa!b"bbb ccddeeeeeeeeeeeeDfEfLff CJOJQJ j jNH0JI0JI65NH65@mH  6@mH SHYIYoYnZZ\N^_)bcd!eLfghik7llS$UndS$TZSF$$Gr" ffff>g?gggggghchdhhhhhhhhjikiijjkk l!llllmmmm5m6m7mgmhmmmmmmBnCnnnnnnnUpVpWpXpYp{p|ppƼƼϵϩj-C2 EHUmH j-C2 CJUVmH  jUmH H*mH  6H*mH 6mH NHmH mH CJH*OJQJ jn6CJOJQJNH6CJOJQJ CJOJQJCJNHOJQJ>lmmZnnpqestttuUv1w2w=wwwE{|[EyӒ*$ `0pSRppqqqqqtquqqqqqqqqqqqr r r r r"r#rgrhrirrrrrsssssssstt]t^titjttttttu6u7u8uOuPujukuuuuuuuuuvv vvSvUv|vvvvvvvv/w1w2w:w;wvwwwwwwNH@6 6H*mH 6mH mH NHmH [wwww x!xxxxxy(y0yIymynyzzD{E{G|H|||B}H}o}p}q~r~qrZ[syDECDJKxy!"tuĊŊtuvwxnost֎׎67ђӒ6@5NH5NH`ӒӓԓÔŔMl.=ܗ !pq>VΚϚ*vEFn:Mŝ؝oŞٞIJPdҟՠ]q8TW 4/Lijæ01 NO?@6@mH  5@mH 5@NH]ӒŔєM.>vn:ŝoŞPҟ] /*$p `0S /9Ek7dcԪPŬʭlƯ[wŰݴնŸPoϺ(G,Rx !&+ UbVaZTS[/9Ek7dcԪPŬʭlƯ[ZxT;TSw­ʭCZ[\]^_abclmnopqvw,-@ABCHI\]^_j;G9 EHUj;G9 CJUVj;G9 EHUj;G9 CJUVj;G9 EHUj;G9 CJUV j0JIj";G9 EHUj";G9 UV jUNH56H*6>_lm}~[\lmnow}~Űưְװذٰ1245qrst,-.345CDEJKLNOxyz|}ú˵ j 6EHH*H*NHj;G9 EHUj;G9 UV6H*j;G9 EHUj;G9 CJUV60JIj;G9 EHUj;G9 CJUV jUC[wŰݴնŸPoϺ(GaT$ZSTZ abcefopǴȴɴδϴдݴ޴2345rstyz{<=>CDEcúj:G9 EHUj:G9 UVjPV9 EHUjPV9 UVj:G9 EHUj:G9 UV 6EHH*H*60JI jUj;G9 EHUj;G9 UVBcdefghijǶȶ̶ͶӶ()z{۷ܷݷ!"[\]^klmĸӸԸոڸ۸ܸ+,-234PQdefgoj:G9 EHUj:G9 CJUV j0JIUNH0JINH0JIH*6T~ºúĺźɺʺ˺̺Ϻк()<=>?G¼ j:G9 EHUj:G9 UVj:G9 EHUj:G9 CJUV j0JIU0JIj:G9 EHUj:G9 CJUV jUNHH*6Fuvw|}~ !"#$%optuvwCD%&'()lmƽ6H* jn6j:G9 EHUj:G9 UV 6@H*6@@0JIj:G9 EHUj:G9 CJUVmH jUNHH*6G,Rx$<<$$*$ `0$*$ `0pUbVS #$)*+,012EFcdklmno789>?@./89@ABCDNH j6H*j:G9 EHUj:G9 UV0JI j0JIU6H* jn6RDpqrstuv014qruDFGUZ[pqrsĿĭĿĨ~ j5CJOJQJ5CJOJQJmHj5CJOJQJU5CJOJQJ jU 6CJmH  jCJOJQJmH CJmH mH  CJH*mH 6@CJOJQJmH 5@CJOJQJmH @mH H* j j66H* jn61 !&+]$$G" 7 v\B( "             $<<$ +05:?DEFHJMPRSTU 6789~234567MUlmno23JRijkl  K K K J  O+05:?DEFH]NL*$ `0p$$G" 7 v\B( "             $<<$HIJKMNPQRSTU 6789 $$F Z "K$$ U"K$$ U"K$ U"K $:K U"J$ p#J p#d %&,-./356789@A}~žŵžׯ~žŵžOJQJ CJOJQJ5;CJKHOJQJ j5;CJKHOJQJ5;CJOJQJCJCJ0JLOJQJmH 0JLOJQJj0JLOJQJU j5CJ5CJOJQJ0JLmH 0JL5mH0JL5j0JL5U j5519~23456K U"$:K U" $$F Z "K$$ U"K$$ U"K$ U" J$ p#U"Jh!"()*+/12345:;ABCDHIlm56ȾȹѴ{OJQJ;CJOJQJ CJOJQJ5;CJKHOJQJ j5;CJKHOJQJ5;CJOJQJ j50JLmH 0JL5mH0JL5j0JL5U50JLOJQJmH 0JLOJQJj0JLOJQJUCJCJ j5CJ5CJ067MUlmno23JRij J$ p#U"Jh $*$ `0U"K U" $$F Z "K$$ U"K$$ U"K$ U"67<=CDEFJL_`klmnoyz12389?@BCGI\]hijklvwɺɟOJQJ;CJOJQJ CJOJQJ5;CJKHOJQJ j5;CJKHOJQJ5;CJOJQJCJCJ j5CJ0JLOJQJmH 0JLOJQJj0JLOJQJU5CJk8HM55ΩA(ɒQ-PUP^y09uDmQy:=n@R!UPa[UNpuTp$!DRQ5PUB WMOxWXNxQU+¿T TOUb WM<֥XTԿTºtIZEU=5:ry񠚡jIWPWry˪ {N}*;(@*B.DYU< Q%Wn𙜲Nu< 853 /jG 1p΍RU#pzv9꿱jTTG&EUDDvDu' *UYa=IЫ T-8brYa Ee*+ShQyAךzTWQ-*?רsUPQxC.QCrudimuulzgTPƦquR`!SeiƱI]jܥ^ʤH}vM ]jjV2TU_Q%PU1ضMwjtuTԡu^j^XQw{չZ.uRUH8.T8lI:ws]c+ԧa M:ujO*{(U XQ,PW9euOK=%;:(s׭N xX Q]5ujkUנeu(kUE%ڢZ.U UQ!4VSIT#հJ 4`Ψh֭DdTeu{^uV~ *)jhReKX ҭNR^TiTe_ΨISf7XFsB PTÃ|:UcǦ~h5uAI*ТzM{! =~BTFUL?̰j+*H:.%5":Ҩ7#D5lVVV*MUm}Vz;揟 ]Ԫ>ʪfO9!S_wQ Tjd=Rjd3ДUm£i>uV]Z*kxL]*Ь::ش>ݬUdʇcqF՞QWKT>on`HD5 qBC,Q5jHU{$4b3\j\z~@JU{'CWݕxH!bB2R󶬨1ƜP)i_iPQݤF6iׯ_fU Bz*^>}.ubM*^.QF P+TNx;4BsuGu,1<64BBXHkTH5xR}eZ1} UNǤ)AGpui5F T9*X*縛U{Djbwʯ0GU/;#7-!r0 y wuRE:m5^!{: P*VjUzIjh_UUT`{TPWSP+Tʦ%Te0VKb]bՒ0U k]EKWbݚV`hUwR 9!֫e2n*ޡ٨nOOͲ!jB2M[ZNoMk,t#W}JOIڍiTJgzU&7նz*_*4Qi]lRGoOTia|ق=3'T?jB HiTӬ_ 14–T{@ҤUPiOUUBu 1`KVl,Y^J]30>:Budj`pR;(޷SBNQATůx ?ԬOXvYb|Ǥ13qC޾cKUy`RFWEyI]MQ^W>@>tTl*Xo*nU;?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry? F  Data WordDocument>vObjectPool) _843056818zFOle PIC LMETA ( !&()*+,-./0123469<>?@ABDIKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ\_`bcfhijklnsuvwxyz{|}~L l F;  .1   &  & MathType@Times New Roman- 2 @8y 2 @fk 2 @@x 2 @x 2 @y x Times New Roman- 2 G NSymbol- 2 @L=Times New Roman- 2 @(~ 2 @,` 2 @,` 2 @.` 2 @e.` 2 @,` 2 @1 )~ Times New Roman- 2 1p 2 2p & "System-.1CompObj _ObjInfoOle10Native mEquation Native | FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2i y = f(* 1 x,* 2 x,...,* N x) `)|( ( y=f(x 1 ,x 2 ,..,x N )_844075070\FOle PIC  LMETA hL==0  .1   & & MathType@-828Times New Roman- 2 q & "System-.1CompObj _ObjInfo"Equation Native #<_843057039FFJu FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 ')7 7 2qLggC  .Ole $PIC %LMETA 'hCompObj5_1   & & MathType-2Times New Roman+- 2 q 2 n 2 q Times New Roman- 2 j> 2 j> 2 WnpSymbol- 2 ^= Symbol- 2 b={Symbol- 2 Times New Roman+- 2 j1 Times New Roman- 2 1p & "System-  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2ObjInfo7Equation Native 8|_8940963700FJuJuOle :`O*P'W)(W) 2q=1nq jj=1n L==F4  .1   & & MathType@-828PIC ;LMETA =hCompObjC_ObjInfo ETimes New Roman- 2 q & "System-  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 O*W) W) 2q.1Equation Native F<_961999435#FJuJuOle GPIC "%HLLt v   .1  @ &  & MathType-v  Times New Roman- 2  s 2 q 2 n 2 T q 2  q Times New RomaMETA J(CompObj$'[_ObjInfo]Ole10Native&(^n- 2 B j> 2 j> 2 =np Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 1p 2 2pTimes New Roman- 2 p1 2 1 2 ^(~ 2 )~ 2  (~ 2  )~Symbol- 2 = 2 - 2  - Symbol- 2 H={Symbol- 2  &  "System-"  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 * 2 s(* j q) = 1n-1 + j=1n  (* j q-q* 2 )Ϡ11l1 s 2 (q)=1n-1(q j -2q j=1n  ) 2L==C  .Equation Native a_843569119c+FJuJuOle dPIC *-eLMETA ghCompObj,.m_ObjInfo/oEquation Native p<1   & & MathType@-828Times New Roman+- 2 q & "System-Ti FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 O*W) W) 2qL; E<l; Ev  _ .1  `&@ & MathType-##!Times New Roman-_8433051492FJu Ole qPIC 14rLMETA t 2  s 2 q 2 s 2 q 2 n Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 2pTimes New Roman- 2 ^(~ 2 )~ 2 2(~ 2 )~Symbol- 2 = &  "System- 2 1 2 ^(CompObj36_ObjInfoOle10Native57YEquation Native | FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2U s(q) = s(* j q) n`11l1 s 2 (2q)=s 2 (q)n_843307585?:F  Ole PIC 9<LMETA L,n9  .1  @& & MathTypeP-WWbTimes New Roman- 2 @4u 2 @qTimes New Roman- 2 @( 2 @t) & "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2V o3%2('2 u(2q)D0L=CompObj;=_ObjInfo>Equation Native <_843307679AF  Ole PIC @CLMETA hCompObjBD_=F4  .1   & & MathType@-828Times New Roman- 2 q & "System-  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 O*W) W) 2q.1LD,D8 ' .1  &@ &ObjInfoEEquation Native <_843057426jHF  Ole PIC GJLMETA hCompObjIL_ObjInfo     / #!"%$)&'(+*.,-01J24358679:;=<>?@BACDEHFGKIMfLONRPQSTUWVXYZ[\]_^c`abdegj~hikmlnropqstuxvwy{z|} MathTypeP-XXbXXTimes New Roman"- 2 @4u 2 @q 2 @s 2 @qTimes New Roman- 2 @( 2 @t) 2 @<( 2 @)Symbol- 2 @`= & "System-age: MathematikSc FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2H * A u(q) = s(q)V@o3x%2'2 u(2q)=s(2q)Ole10NativeKMLEquation Native \_856590258PF wOle PIC ORLMETA CompObjQS_ObjInfoTL{h{v   .1  @`&@ & MathType`Times New Roman- 2  s Times New Roman- 2 pp 2 2p &  "System-i> Times New  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 )Xg7g7 s p2nL=Equation Native <_844504246 NWFwwOle PIC VYLMETA hCompObjXZ_ObjInfo[Equation Native <=F4  .1   & & MathType@-828Times New Roman- 2 q & "System-  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 O*W) W) 2q.1LMh$Mhv  j .1  & & MathType-_844504245^FwwOle PIC ]`LMETA CCkTimes New Roman- 2  s 2 q 2 s 2 Un Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 2pTimes New Roman- 2 `(~ 2 )~ Times New Roman- 2 ppSymbol- 2 = &  "System-Times New Roman- 2  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2`)|g7 g7 s 2 (2q)=s p2 nCompObj_a_ObjInfobEquation Native |_8430578718eFwwOle PIC dgLMETA CompObjfh_L D ? m .1   & v & MathType-Times New Roman- 2 `,x 2 `a 2 `a Times New Roman- 2 i>Symbol- 2 `= 2 `w+ Symbol- 2 |+{ 2 h-{Times New Roman- 2 J1 2 h2 2 `!(~ 2 `! )~ & "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 `)L4(5( x i =12(a + +a - )RomanLoEloE:  .ObjInfoiEquation Native |_843057749lFw?Ole PIC knLMETA CompObjmp_ObjInfo      !"#$%&(+-023456789:;<=>?ADGIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[]`bcdgijklmnopqrstuvwxy{~1  &  & MathType-STimes New Roman- 2 `4u 2 `^x 2 `a 2 ` a Times New Roman- 2 i> Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 D 2pTimes New Roman- 2 k11 2 12 2 `( 2 `) 2 `( 2 ` )Symbol- 2 `}= 2 ` - Symbol- 2 +{ 2  -{ & "System-@@@@ FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 * 2 u(* i x) = 112(* + a-* - a* 2 )V̀o32@2 u 2 (x i )=112(a + -a - ) 2?Ole10NativeoqEquation Native _843057998tF??Ole PIC svLMETA CompObjux'_ObjInfo)L^ EOl^ E8 i .1  &@ & MathType-Times New Roman- 2 `4u 2 `^x 2 `a Times New Roman- 2 i> Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 2pTimes New Roman- 2 k1 2 3 2 `( 2 `)Symbol- 2 `}= & "System-@&DL4` 8'N FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2` * 2 u(* i x) = 13* 2 aV`o3P'2(2 u 2 (x i )=13a 2p 2 L hOle10Nativewy*dEquation Native ,|_843048057|F??Ole .PIC {~/LMETA 1CompObj}@_ObjInfoB hB  .1   &`  & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 u 2 Jy 2 u 2  y Times New Roman- 2 i> 2 Si> 2 N Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 2p 2 1pTimes New Roman- 2 (~ 2 )~ 2 j(~ 2  )~Symbol- 2 = Symbol- 2 ={Symbol- 2 , & "System-Schreibgeschtzt)/VWv vvhwhD FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 `)C(<( u 2 (y)=u i2 (y) i=1N L_( Equation Native C|_843058538rF??Ole EPIC FLMETA HCompObj\_ObjInfo^Ole10Native_N_&: Q .1  @&  & MathType-<<J<< 0 H Times New Roman- 2 c 2 Qfk 2  x 2 fk 2 BX Times New Roman- 2 i> 2 (i> 2 (T i> 2 o^ X 2 o xb 2 o, X 2 oxb`Times New Roman- 2  Nk 2 NkSymbol- 2 = 2 = Symbol- 2 oX ={ 2 o{={Symbol- 2  2  2 T 2 `Times New Roman- 2  1P 2 K 1P Times New Roman- 2 o .8 2 o .8 & "System-X FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2J * i c = f* i x3|2 2 c i =fx i =fX i b X 1 =x 1 ..X N =x N  & MathTyLh Equation Native a_888371344U F?Ole ePIC fLMETA hHCompObjz_ObjInfo|Ole10Native}}h.   .1  & & MathTypeTimes New Roman X- 2 cfk 2 X 2 9X 2 X 2 p 2 X Times New Roman- 2  N 2 ui> 2 "i> 2  i> 2 & NTimes New Roman X- 2 *(~ 2 x,` 2 ,` 2 ,` 2  )~ Times New Roman- 2 1p 2 Y2p 2  1pMT Extra- 2 dKSymbol- 2  = Symbol- 2 5 ={Symbol- 2   &  "System-Times New Roman X- 2 @ FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2y * 2 u(y) = + i=1N * 2 u (* i x )ϠO?@=A= f(X 1 ,XEquation Native _889949810FOle PIC L 2 ,K,X N )=p i X ii=1N   &Lh`h.  f .1  & & MathTypeTimes New Roman X-META CompObj_ObjInfoEquation Native | 2 Fy 2 ]p 2 x Times New Roman- 2 ,i> 2 hi> 2 i> 2 NSymbol- 2 A= Symbol- 2 ={Symbol- 2 d Times New Roman X- 2 _1p &  "System-1p 2  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2`O?pD=<= y=p i x ii=1N L1 _843059002FOle PIC LMETA 1>;  .1  @ &  & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 4u 2 jy 2 Jp 2 u 2  x Times New Roman- 2 i> 2  i> 2 i> 2 N Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 %2p 2  2p 2 Q1pTimes New Roman- 2 ( 2 $) 2 : ( 2  )Symbol- 2 = Symbol- 2 ={Symbol- 2 N & "System-- 2   FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2y * 2 u(y) = + i=1N * 2 u (* i x )V̀o1080 u 2 (y)=p i2 u 2 (x i ) CompObj_ObjInfoOle10Native}Equation Native i=1N Lh h  . .1   & & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 cfk 2 X 2 X 2 8_888371927FOle PIC LMETA X 2  c 2 X Times New Roman)- 2 G N 2 i> 2 *pp 2 ) i> 2 [ N`Times New Roman- 2 i,Times New Roman)- 2 *(~ 2 L,` 2 ,` 2 ,` 2 + )~ Times New Roman- 2 1p 2 2p 2  1pMT Extra- 2 KSymbol- 2  = Symbol- 2 j ={Symbol- 2   &  "System-Clock clock.ini FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 CompObj_ObjInfoEquation Native _889950079F;p;pDS Equation Equation.2ϠO?O=dQ= f(X 1 ,X 2 ,K,X N )=cX ip i i=1N TimeLh`Ole PIC LMETA HCompObj_h8  .1  & & MathTypeTimes New Romanu- 2 Fy 2 uc 2 (x Times New Roman- 2 i> 2  pp 2 i> 2 N`Times New Romanu- 2 wi,Symbol- 2 G= Symbol- 2 ={Symbol- 2  Times New Romanu- 2 21p &  "System-ormatvorlage: MathematikSchriftgrad: St FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2ObjInfoEquation Native |_8430590530F;p;pOle `O?J=TK= y=cx ip i i=1N SymbolLp:  .1  @ &@  &PIC LMETA CompObj_ObjInfo MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 @w 2 y 2 p 2  w 2  x Times New Roman- 2 ci> 2 ; i> 2 i> 2 #N Times New Roman- 2 [2p 2 2p 2 8 2p 2 1pTimes New Roman- 2 ( 2 p) 2  ( 2  )Symbol- 2 a= Symbol- 2 ,={Symbol- 2  & "System-  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2y * 2 v(y) = + i=1N * 2 v (* i x )V̀o3242 w 2 (y)=p i2 w 2 (x i ) i=1N TimeL,Ole10Native}Equation Native _843308845F;p;pOle PIC LMETA CompObj _ObjInfo   "%&')*+.012345679>@ABCDFKMNOPQSXZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnpstuwx{}~n9  .1  @& & MathTypeP-WWbTimes New Roman- 2 @4u 2 @qTimes New Romanx- 2 @( 2 @t) & "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2V o3%2T'2 u(2q)LEquation Native  <_960969506!F;p;pOle  PIC LMETA CompObj!_ObjInfo#Ole10Native$*  .1  &` & MathType@Times New Roman- 2 @u 2 @|x 2 @Kx 2 @u 2 @Ax 2 @ u 2 @f x 2 @b r 2 @x 2 @x 2 @ik 2 @k Times New Roman%- 2 .i> 2  kb 2 i> 2 & kb 2 di> 2 AkbTimes New Roman- 2 @(~ 2 @,` 2 @)~ 2 @(~ 2 @t )~ 2 @ (~ 2 @ )~ 2 @(~ 2 @,` 2 @)~ 2 @_(~ 2 @)~Symbol- 2 @= 2 @ & "System-die Auftragsbearbeitung fo FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 u(* i x,* k x) = u(* i x)u(* k x)r(* i x,* k x)   (ik)Equation Native (_960969503F;pOle ,PIC -L  =< = u(x i ,x k )=u(x i )u(x k )r(x i ,x k )(ik)Dm-*.Lq,qG  .META /CompObj8_ObjInfo:Equation Native ;<1   & & MathType@- (( Times New Roman- 2 `NrSymbol- 2 `uTimes New Roman- 2 `m1 &  "System-RCESCALEVIEWPORTEXTEXSET FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2r 710?2? rab1L``P  ._960969499FOle <PIC =LMETA ?h1  @&  & MathType@-8A8Times New Roman- 2 Fp &  "System- h^Vn& v v vv FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2CompObjE_ObjInfoGEquation Native H<_960969498F /7   2p,4!  5&QL==vF  .1   & & MathType@-2,2Times New Roman- 2 q Ole IPIC JLMETA LhCompObjR_&  "System- h^Vn& v v vv FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 /7 l  2qL$ObjInfoTEquation Native U<_960969496FOle VPIC WLMETA YHCompObjo_ObjInfoq   .1  @&  & MathType-p0q G2Times New Roman- 2  s 2 rp 2 q 2 n 2 -n 2 1 p 2 Ip 2 4q 2 q Times New Roman- 2 ,j> 2 /j> 2  j> 2 E npTimes New Roman- 2 (~ 2 ;,` 2 )~ 2 (~ 2  )~ 2 p (~ 2 %)(~~ 2 )~Symbol- 2 = 2 A- 2 - 2 - Symbol- 2 P ={Symbol- 2  Times New Roman- 2 p1 2 9 1 Times New Roman- 2  1p &  "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 s(p,q) = 1n(n-1) + j=1n  (* j p-p) (* j q-q)oРo*-x - s(2p,2q)=1n(n-1)(p j -2p)Ole10NativerEquation Native v_960969494FhhOle y(q j -2q) j=1n Lh@hM  .1  & & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 u 2 Vy 2 c 2 ,PIC zLMETA |CompObj_ObjInfou 2 P x 2 $c 2 Bc 2 u 2 x 2 x Times New Roman- 2 i> 2  i> 2 i> 2 kb 2 i> 2 kb 2 kb 2  i> 2 N 2 i> 2 WN 2 Di> 2 |N Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 2p 2  2p 2 1p 2 E1p 2 1p 2 1pTimes New Roman- 2  2 2 (~ 2 !)~ 2  (~ 2  )~ 2 O(~ 2 1,` 2 ])~Symbol- 2 = 2 _ + Symbol- 2 ={ 2 g+{ 2 ={ 2 -{ 2 ={Symbol- 2 [ 2 J 2  &  "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2> * 2 u(y) = + i=1Ole10NativeBEquation Native <_960969491FhhOle N * i2 c* 2 u(* i x) + 2 + i=1N-1 + k=i+1N * i c* k cu(* i x,* k x)  111 u 2 (y)=c i2 u 2 (x i )+2c i c k u(x i ,x k ) k=i+1N  i=1N-1  i=1N  2 @L$h$h*  .1  @&  & MathTypeTimes New Roman-PIC LMETA CompObj_ObjInfo 2 u 2 Jy 2 u 2  y 2 gu 2 Ty 2 u 2 y 2 r 2 Xx 2 'x Times New Roman%- 2 i> 2 Si> 2 N 2 %i> 2 dkb 2  i> 2 kb 2 ^kb 2 `i> 2 !N 2  i> 2 N Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 2p 2 1p 2 *1p 2  1p 2 1pTimes New Roman%- 2  2 2 (~ 2 )~ 2 j(~ 2  )~ 2 (~ 2 )~ 2 (~ 2 ~)~ 2 (~ 2 ,` 2 )~Symbol- 2 = 2  + Symbol- 2 ={ 2 ={ 2 +{ 2  ={ 2 W -{Symbol- 2 , 2  2   & "System- //UQUQ! FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2  =8= u 2 (y)=u i2 (y) i=1N  +2u i (y)u k (y)r(x i ,x k ) k=i+1N  i=1N-1 ^ x 2 `LEquation Native <_960969476FhhOle PIC LN 4 .1    &  & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 CFX 2 Ctg 2 CBQ 2 CSQ 2 C Q 2 FX 2 g 2 Q 2 Q 2 = Q Times New Roman*- 2  L}META CompObj_ObjInfoEquation Native  2 U L} Times New Roman- 2 >1p 2 *1p 2 91p 2 a2p 2 U2p 2 h2p 2 1p 2 2pPSymbol- 2 C=Q 2 F=QTimes New Roman- 2 C(~ 2 C,` 2 C,` 2 Cx .` 2 C .` 2 C\ ,` 2 C )~ 2 (~ 2 ,` 2 F ,` 2  .` 2 3 .` 2  ,` 2  )~ &  "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2/)7 7 X 1 =g 1 (Q 1 ,Q 2 ,..,Q L )X 2 =g 2 (Q 1 ,Q 2 ,..,Q L )Lh hN   .1  @&  &_960969468Fh9Ole PIC LMETA H MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 u 2 sx 2 Dx 2 uc 2  c 2 j u 2 b q Times New Roman*- 2 { l> 2  l> 2 %l> 2 l> 2 <L}Times New Roman- 2 (~ 2 ,` 2 )~ 2  (~ 2 )~ Times New Roman*- 2 1p 2 2p 2  1p 2  2p 2 : 2p 2 1pPSymbol- 2 w=Q PSymbol- 2 7=PSymbol- 2 @ &  "System-- 2 1p & CompObj_ObjInfoEquation Native _962000208F99 FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2ʠ/)x'7,7 u(x 1 ,x 2 )=c 1l c 2l u 2 (q l ) l=1L LOle PIC LMETA CompObj _  !"#$%&'()*,/0356789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKMPQRSTWYZ[\]^_`abcdefghjmnortuvwxy{N  .1  &` & MathType@Times New Roman- 2 @c Times New Roman*- 2 l> Times New Roman- 2 1p &  "System-2 2p  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 /)-717 c 1lcLObjInfo Equation Native  <_960969466F99Ole  PIC  LMETA CompObj  _ObjInfo N  .1  & & MathType@Times New Roman- 2 @c Times New Roman*- 2 Cl> Times New Roman- 2 2p &  "System-2 2p  FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 /)@5767 c 2lLq8qNO c .Equation Native <_960969445)F99Ole PIC LMETA CompObj+_ObjInfo-Equation Native .1   & & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 C*x 2 Cq 2 Cnz 2 *x 2 q 2 z Times New Roman- 2 1p 2 1p 2 2p 2 22pSymbol- 2 C= 2 CJ- 2 = 2 q- Times New Roman- 2 lS} 2 S} &  "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2oЀg*Jg @Kg  x 1 =q S -z 1 x 2 =q S -z 2 2 L`n4  .1   &  & MathTypeTimes New Roman- 2 u 2 x 2 *u 2 _960969432FOle 1PIC 2LMETA 4q 2 3 u 2 + z 2 u 2 x 2 Qu 2 5q 2 Z u 2 R z 2 tu 2 tsx 2 t&x 2 tiu 2 tMq Times New Roman- 2 2p 2 1p 2 2p 2 2p 2 T2p 2 `2p 2 T2p 2 T 2p 2  1p 2 2p 2 /2pTimes New Roman- 2 i(~ 2 7)~ 2 }(~ 2 h)~ 2  (~ 2  )~ 2 i(~ 2 ^)~ 2 (~ 2 )~ 2  (~ 2  )~ 2 t(~ 2 t,` 2 tv)~ 2 t(~ 2 t )~Symbol- 2 = 2  + 2 #= 2 @ + 2 t;= Times New Roman- 2 S} 2 `S} 2 S} &  "System-34ESP358FIN33FRA36HUN354ISL3 FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2o@g*Jg @Kg  u 2 (xCompObjL_ObjInfoNEquation Native O\_960969430"F 1 )=u 2 (q S )+u 2 (z)u 2 (x 2 )=u 2 (q S )+u 2 (z)u(x 1 ,x 2 )=u 2 (q S ) LfL Ole UPIC VLMETA X(CompObj i_f^P  .1  @& & MathType-#`#Times New RomanLh- 2 r 2 `x 2 x 2 u 2  q 2 vu 2 Zq 2  u 2 w zTimes New Roman- 2 (~ 2 v,` 2 c)~ 2  (~ 2  )~ 2 (~ 2  )~ 2  (~ 2 /)~ Times New RomanLh- 2 1p 2 2p 2 y 2p 2 <2p 2 E 2pSymbol- 2 (= 2 e + Times New RomanLh- 2 E S} 2  S} &  "System-s14 FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2og*Jg @Kg  r(x 1 ,x 2 )=u 2 (q S )u 2 (q S )+u 2 (z)~ 2  )~ ObjInfo!kEquation Native l_960969426$FOle pLG  .1  & & MathType@Times New Roman- 2 @Q Times New Roman- 2 0l> &  PIC #&qLMETA sCompObj%'z_ObjInfo(|"System-Times New Roman- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2r 71?l? Q lLSN Equation Native }<_960969415+F+kOle ~PIC *-LSN J .1  @& & MathTypep "-  [Symbol-2 ?([Symbol-2 ?*)Times New Roman1- 2 4META CompObj,.kObjInfo/Equation Native u 2 Ry 2 u 2 y 2  u 2  y 2 u 2 y Times New Roman - 2 ^rW Times New Roman1- 2 t2p 2 l1p 2 b 2p 2 2p 2 tv2pTimes New Roman - 2 ( 2  ) 2 ( 2 ^) 2  ( 2 i ) 2 ( 2 })Symbol- 2  2 ] + 2 + & "Systemn- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.29qװlN(qNmN u 2 (y)u 1 (y)ab+u 2 (y)ab() 2 +u r2 (y)L==^>  .1  ` &@ &_96096941172F+k+kOle PIC 14LMETA H MathType@Times New Roman- 2 Fy &  "System-  T> > FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2 W+* * yjACompObj35_ObjInfo6Equation Native <_9609694039F+k+kOle PIC 8;LMETA CompObj:<_L    A .1  ` & ! & MathType-;;T -##t Symbol5- 2  n 2 n Times New Roman- 2 effbIITimes New Roman- 2 [(~ 2 )~ 2 >(~ 2 )~Symbol- 2 = Symbol- 2 t={Symbol- 2 Times New Roman- 2 u 2 y 2 u 2 y Times New Roman- 2 i> 2 %i> 2 3i> 2 eN Times New Roman- 2 4p 2 4p 2 1p &  "System- FMicrosoft Formel-Editor 2.0 DS Equation Equation.2ObjInfo=Equation Native 1TableHe5SummaryInformation(@T/ˠ+|D* =* n eff =u 4 (y)u i4 (y)n ii=1N & MathTy ՜.+,0 px  :' o:cU~ DocumentSummaryInformation8+k VBAC+k ThisDocumentED  Oh+'0$/$0@ T` |   '@Guidelines for the Expression of the Uncertainty of MeasurementuidHans-Reiner BeilichansansNormali Marc Smith 2rcMicrosoft Word 8.0@F#@p>"S@FE@FE6GP-PICT-HJS HHJSMSWD JS,Arial .(U EDITION 1 ,  Wingdings)5) APRIL 1997)EA-4/02 z)PAGE ) 1) OF )27*Wc JS7iHH  %7i+Xb22222228uS8uS8uS8PeNtKeNtKeNtKJrrrS ; ; ;V3D3D3D\???\+ Li+ Li+ Lib:_J:_J:_J\,?,?,?n =N =N =Nh!5$a !5$a !5$a bLuPLuPLuPbqy|\Mqy|\Mqy|\Mk<eO <eO <eO be4Re4Re4RnGI{/IGI{/IGI{/Ib*  *  *  \oT]oT]oT]n: N: N: Nq*>'*>'*>'hfLDdfLDdfLDdepO7pO7pO7S-p-p-pJ!oh!oh!oh_Xrg<Xrg<Xrg<k [G [G [GnPGjPGjPGjhb%P,0b%P,0b%P,0e Wf3" Wf3" Wf3"b){t){t){tkFFFh[-&*[-&*[-&*no9[\<e~o9[\<e~o9[\<e~k@ )R@ )R@ )R+)rj c+)rj c+)rj cY \3c<+ \3c<+ \3c<+_zO|zO|zO|L<ǀqmXX0ZX:L<ǀqmXX0ZX:L<ǀqmXX0ZX:qD;WD;WD;Wqa2a2a2qg1*g1*g1*kN  uN  uN  uqv1v1v1q 5 5 5efS]fS]fS]_ȩȩȩ +B (>European){ cooperation)for B^ (Y Accreditation)of)! Laboratories JS (XPublication Ref)e) rence j$ ,+ EAL-R2 1jUm1jm1jm$1j$m'1j'm 1U$1$'1'  JS,Times New Roman ( UExpression of the Uncertainty*,of Measurement in Calibr(5a)tion (]UPURPOSE *TheU) )pur)p)ose) )of)  )thi) s) )doc)u)ment) )is) )to)  )har)m)onise) )eva)l)uation) )of)  )unc)e)rtaint)y) )of)  )mea)s)ure)men)t(Uwit)h)in)  )EAL),U) )toU)  )set )up, )inU)  )add)i)tion) )toU)  )theU) )gen)e)ral)  )req)u)iremen) t)s) )of)  )EAL)-)R1,) )theU) )spe)c)ific) )d)e)-(Uman)d)sU) )in ) r)e)por)t)ingU) )unc)e)rtaint)y) )of ) mea)s)uremen)#t) )on )cal) i)bratio)n) )cer)t)ificat)e)s) )iss) u)ed)  )byU)  )acc)r)e)dit) e)d(Ulab)o)ratori)e)sU) )and) )to ) ass)i)stU)  )acc)r)editat)i)onU)  )bod)i)esU)  )wit)h) )a )coh)e)rentU) )ass)ign)m)entU) )of ) bes)t) )mea)sur)e)ment(Ucap)a)bility )to ) cal) i)bratio)n) )lab)o)ratori)e)s) )acc)r)editedU) )byU)  )the)m).) )AsU) )the )rul) e)s) )lai) dU) )dow)nU) )inU)  )thi) sU) )doc)u)-(Umen)tU) )are )inU)  )co) m) pli) a)nce) )wit)hU) )the )rec)o)mmenda)(t)ions) )ofU)  )the )Gui)d)e) )toU)  )the )Exp)r)essionU) )of)  )Unc)e)r)-(Utai) n)ty)  )inU)  )Mea)s)ur) e)men)t),) )pub)l)ished) )byU)  )sev)e)n) )int) e)r)nat)i)onal) )org)a)nisati)o)ns)  )con)c)erned) )wit)h) )sta)n)-(Udar)d)isatio)nU) )and )met)r)o)l)ogy),U) )the )imp)l)ementa)"t)ion) )ofU)  )EAL)-)R2) )wil)l) )als) o) )fos)t)er)  )theU) )glo)b)al) )a)cce)p)-(Utan)c)eU) )of ) Eur)o)peanU) )res)u)ltsU)  )of ) mea)s)uremen)#t). !J!JS!S! I!IR!R!.@Guidelines for the Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement Contents1 Introduction2 Outline and definitions?3 Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement of input estimates 3.1 General considerations2 3.2 Type A evaluation of standard uncertainty2 3.3 Type B evaluation of standard uncertaintyA4 Calculation of the standard uncertainty of the output estimate&5 Expanded uncertainty of measurementF6 Statement of uncertainty of measurement in calibration certificatesH7 Step-by-step procedure for calculating the uncertainty of measurement8 References Appendix A> Comments on the assessment of best measurement capability Appendix B$ Glossary of some relevant terms Appendix C* Sources of uncertainty of measurement Appendix D Correlated input quantitiesAnnex E@ Coverage factors derived from effective degrees of freedom.@Guidelines for the Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement Contents1 Introduction2 Outline and definitions?3 Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement of input estimates 3.1 General considerations2 3.2 Type A evaluation of standard uncertainty2 3.3 Type B evaluation of standard uncertaintyA4 Calculation of the standard uncertainty of the output estimate&5 Expanded uncertainty of measurementF6 Statement of uncertainty of measurement in calibration certificatesH7 Step-by-step procedure for calculating the uncertainty of measurement8 References Appendix A> Comments on the assessment of best measurement capability Appendix B$ Glossary of some relevant terms Appendix C* Sources of uncertainty of measurement Appendix D Correlated input quantitiesAnnex E@ Coverage factors derived from effective degrees of freedom. Title HeadingsTitelberschriften     !"#$%'x iEM ("SS"S<1Normal.ThisDocument($ @ x` X00"   0 @ P ` p>H>P<X`bpb`dhV(Hhx"4 B8>&J*8Bh*,$( P&p$& &8D`HD: 80 x    , * P  0 (   ($ @< h:  @  @ `6 x@    ( @ X p " l 8@x&B08hjhhx"0P4h">((8PZF<684p00(0"Px   bP`Attribute VB_Name = "ThisDocument" Bas1Normal.VCreatabl`False PredeclaIdxTru "ExposeTemplate Deriv$Customizc_VBA_PROJECT dirPROJECTwm)PROJECTBF Daa  '*\H{000204EF-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}#3.0#9#8500_CPU:Microsoft Office 98:Office:VBA Object Library (1)#Visual Basic For Applications*\H{00020905-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}#8.0#0#8500_CPU:Microsoft Office 98:Microsoft Word\128#Microsoft Word 8.0 Object Library*\H{00020430-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}#2.0#0#8500_CPU:System Folder:Extensions:Type Libraries:Standard OLE Types 2#OLE Automation*\H{92396810-A79F-11D0-8ADF-00A0C91110EB}#2.0#0#8500_CPU:Microsoft Office 98:Office:Visual Basic for Applications\2#Microsoft Forms 2.0 Object Library*\H{92C78480-A79F-11D0-8ADF-00A0C91110EB}#2.0#0#8500_CPU:Microsoft Office 98:Office:Visual Basic for Applications\3#Microsoft Forms 2.0 Object Library E..`M *\D9906zz:Normal *\D:Normal7!\*\H{2DF8D04C-5BFA-101B-BDE5-00AA0044DE52}#2.0#0#8500_CPU:Microsoft Office 98:Office:Microsoft Office 98\0#Microsoft Office 8.0 Object Library7PS ThisDocument 33750a553*D q ;ZӉPb>`01+WordkVBAWin16~Win32MacProject1 stdole`MSFormsCProject- ThisDocument< _EvaluateNormal߄OfficeuDocumentjAutoOpen*لDC\IT] Application*EnableCancelKeyOptionsVirusProtectionDoSaveNormalPromptʀConfirmConversionsaXActiveDocument\ӀSaveddRight NormalTemplateq VBProjecthO VBComponents' Itemz׀ CodeModuleLinesκ AddFromStringvbCr$ CountOfLines\!SaveAs;fFileNamejFullNameDayNow%SystemaPrivateProfileString[GoOkNTestCon}SIYShellVvbHideWUserName\`   0 H 'Pr@oject(T@= +l SP7 J< rstdole>stdole %*\H{00020430-C 0046}#2.0#0#8500_CPU:System Folder:Extensions:Type Libraries:Standard OLE s 2#Automat CMSFo@rms> MSFYrm@s/ Z92396810-A79F-11D0-8ADFZA0C91110EBZMicrosoft Office 98::Visual Basic for ApplicPs\2#P ObvyLc0 1C78481131.E .`MX 6Nga*lÔNga@ (*\D9@906zz: D\!7Gç-Of@iTc§ H{2DF8D04C-5BFA-101B-BDE5ՁzA42zP \0HFC% 8.0ERxThisDocumentN2Thi YD&cuQZenr`H1zq ,"," ""+-ThisDocumentThisDocumentID="{3B5AC004-160F-11D3-8950-080007EF623E}" Document=ThisDocument/&H00000000 Name="Project" HelpContextID="0" CMG="5052C4E2C8E2C8E2C8E2C8" DPB="A0A2343735373537" GC="F0F2648765876578" [Host Extender Info] &H00000001={3832D640-CF90-11CF-8E43-00A0C911005A};VBE;&H00000000 [Workspace] ThisDocument=0, 0, 0, 0, C  FMicrosoft Word DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8d [(@(NormalCJmH J@"J Heading 1$;5CJ$KHmH @@@ Heading 2 $h56CJmH 66 Heading 3 $566 Heading 4 $x522 Heading 5 <CJ66 Heading 6 <6CJ22 Heading 7 <CJ66 Heading 8 <6CJ6 6 Heading 9 <6CJ<A@<Default Paragraph FontLL Syllabus 1 *$ 05CJOJQJkHmH LL Syllabus 2 *$ 05CJOJQJkHmH LL Syllabus 3 *$ 05CJOJQJkHmH <O!< pascal_progrCJOJQJkHmH n2n procedure:d *$ ,X .\2"OJQJkHmH LBL cursus.nld *$ 0CJOJQJkHmH ^R^Alineanummer 1S*$ 0CJOJQJkHmH (Oa( Bibliografie$Oq$ Dokument 5$O$ Dokument 6.O. Dokument 4 56CJ``Alineanummer 2*$ 0CJOJQJkHmH NN Dokument 1$$*$ 0CJOJQJkHmH ddAlineanummer 3! *$ 0pCJOJQJkHmH ffAlineanummer 4$K *$ 0p@ CJOJQJkHmH jjAlineanummer 5'*$ 0p@ CJOJQJkHmH ppAlineanummer 6-*$  0p@ CJOJQJkHmH 8O8 Dokument 2CJOJQJkHmH rrAlineanummer 70!D*$ 0p@ CJOJQJkHmH v"vAlineanummer 83"*$ # 0p@ PCJOJQJkHmH 8O18 Techn initCJOJQJkHmH "OA" Doku init8OQ8 Dokument 3CJOJQJkHmH $Oa$ Dokument 7$Oq$ Dokument 8:O: Technisch 1CJOJQJkHmH :O: Technisch 2CJOJQJkHmH :O: Technisch 3CJOJQJkHmH RR Technisch 5+<*$ 05CJOJQJkHmH RR Technisch 6,<*$ 05CJOJQJkHmH RR Technisch 7-<*$ 05CJOJQJkHmH NN Technisch 4 .*$ 05CJOJQJkHmH RR Technisch 8/<*$ 05CJOJQJkHmH JJVolgblad0d*$ 0CJOJQJkHmH LL preszokader1d*$ 0OJQJkHmH "Koptekstp2*$ h"6Qm  + F a} ;Vq 0!K"f#CJOJQJkHmH F2F frutzokader 3*$ 0OJQJkHmH LBL presmekader4d*$ 0OJQJkHmH FRF frutmekader 5*$ 0OJQJkHmH pbp a. FRUTIGER76*$ /7Sn J %]OJQJkHmH |r| b. PREST ELI=7d*$ /7Sn J %CJOJQJkHmH 0O0KadersCJOJQJkHmH @@CERTIF9*$ 0OJQJkHmH pp Certificaat7:*$ /]x8p JOJQJkHmH nn Verklaring7;*$ /9To K ']OJQJkHmH @@TOC 1 <0*$ (#$mH <<TOC 2=0*$ (#$mH <<TOC 3>p0*$ (#$mH <<TOC 4?@ 0*$ (#$mH <<TOC 5@0*$ (#$mH 88TOC 6A0*$ (#$mH ..TOC 7 B0*$mH 88TOC 8C0*$ (#$mH 88TOC 9D0*$ (#$mH @ @Index 1E`*$ (#$mH @ @Index 2F0*$ (#$mH ,r,toaG*$ (#$mH """CaptionH2O2_Equation Caption<@<Header J p#CJOJQJkHmH 4 @4FooterKCJ OJQJkHmH :)@: Page Number5CJOJQJkHRRFootnote Text,fnt MCJOJQJkHmH 8&@8Footnote ReferenceH* AufzhlunghO & F>T.OJQJkHmH BB Body Text PCJOJQJkHmH *B* Body TextQ\O"\ DritteOrdnungR$nWd nOJQJkHmH >O2>eaS$;dOJQJkHmH <OB<ea1T$dOJQJkHmH <OR<ea2U$dxOJQJkHmH 8Ob8ea3V;dx mH realkWdx>T.OJQJkHmH TT ErsteOrdnungX$V OJQJkHmH @@figure Y$h5OJQJkHmH @oA@ formelzeileZdx U"PPlitera"[$ dx  OJQJkHmH \-\ Macro Text"\  ` @ CJOJQJkHmH 00na ]$OJQJkHmH PP reference^$fx fOJQJkHmH &&Text _dxFF ZweiteOrdnung`;1$ mH ,OA,notea; &O"&formel2b020 formelzeile2cK 2s3ho K9e)aaa&___b"*S0j2E73@FILQXCYfpwӒ_cD6  & g0C+VXY3YHYlӒ/[+H96j1 X+= N P ***3+D+F++++g,x,z,---L-]-_----.".$.Y.j.l.D0X0Z0E1Y1[1111!<2<4<Y<j<l<<= =@@@BBBFFFTGeGgGGGG)H:H:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*,fmot&FMTVJQTb!!!!!!!!!! Introductionoutline REL_QUANT evaluationSD_AVG Arbeitsende SD_RECTANG calculationOZR_FORM ONZ_CONTR SENS_FACTexpanded statement stepbystep referencesAppendix CORR_COEFFUNC_CORR UNC_CORR_2EndeM $K-e:X<H?@BBKU`gp2sZĬE Y $K-e:X<?@BBnU a6hp