ࡱ> 7 dbjbjUU "7|7|`lD8,8,8,8, D,D.L,,,,,,,,KKKKKKK$L OrK,,,,,K(B,,K(B(B(B, ,,K(B,K(B(B6IaKK,, P9ˋD)8,6t yKKK0.LK,vOB"vOK(BCONSTITUTIONAL LAW Federal Judicial Power Case and Controversy requirement Standing Injury P has been or imminently will be injured Sierra Club members didnt use the park so they were not injured by Disneys proposed use of it If youve been choked by LAPD, you cannot sue for injunction b/c it is not likely you will choked by them again Causation and redressability the D actually caused the injury and a favorable court decision is likely remedy No 3rd party standing except Close relationship btw P and the injured 3rd party Dr/patient If injured is unlikely to be able to assert his own rights Crim. D has standing to raise rights of prospective jurors to be from discrim jury selection Organization may sue for its members if Members would have standing Interests are germans to orgs purpose Neither claim nor relief requires individ members participation No general citizen or taxpayer standing except Taxpayers have standing to challenge govern expenditures as viol Est Clause Ripeness whether fed ct may grant pre-enforcement review of statute or regulation ALWAYS an issue when fed ct asked to give decl judg Ct will look at: How great will hardship suffered w/o review Whether ct has everything it needs in front of it to make a decision purely question of law supports ripeness MASS: will not issue advisory opinions btw private litigants will certify questions from fed ct and legislature, governor Mootness moot if events after filing of suit end the Ps injury m/b a live controversy except wrong capable of repetition but evading review (abortion) voluntary cessation but D may resume at any time class action suits as long as one member has an ongoing injury Political Question republican form of government violation challenging the Press conduct in foreign policy challenging impeachment and removal process challenging gerrymandering Supreme Ct Review Certiorari statutory provision not constitutional right all cases from state courts after there has been a final judgment of the states highest court must NOT be an independent and adequate state law ground of decision or USSC will not hear it if state case decided on both state law and fed law, USSC will not hear case if reversal of fed law ground would not change result All cases from US cts of appeals Appeal only decisions pf three-judge federal dist cts skips the fed ct appeals Original and exclusive jurisdiction suits btw state governments Lower fed ct review Fed cts (and state cts) may not hear suits against state governments Sov Immunity 11 Amendment bars suits against states in fed ct Sov Immun bars suits against states in state courts or fed agencies Exceptions states may be sued Waiver is permitted (express) Pursuant to fed law adopted under sec 5 of 14A laws to enforce 14A (usually civil rights) Watch out for suit against state pursuant to any other constitutional provision = NO! Feds may sue states Suits against state officers are allowed as long as it is NOT the states treasury that will pay Abstention fed cts may NOT enjoin pending state ct proceedings (must wait until state action is complete) Fed Legislative Power Congs authority to act M/b express or implied cong power no general federal police power except military, Indians, fed land, or D.C. N&P Clause NEVER an answer when standing alone Tax/Spend may tax/spend for general welfare no general welfare power Commerce Power cong may regulate channels of interstate commerce instrumentalities and persons/things in interstate commerce economic activities that have a substantial effect (even if only substantial as a result of a cumulative effect) on interstate commerce cum impact cannot be used when activity is non-economic 10 Amend Cong cannot compel state regulatory or legislative action No commandeering Cong MAY induce state action by putting strings on grants so long as the conditions are expressly stated and relate to the purpose of the spending program State drinking age m/b 21 or no highway funds Cong may prohibit harmful commercial activity by state governs States prohibited from releasing driver DMV information Congs power under sec 5 of 14A may not create new rights or expand the scope of rights may act only to prevent or remedy violation of rights recognized by the cts Religious Freedom Restoration Act unconst b/c Cong created a new right Delegation of powers NO limit on Congs ability to delegate its legislative power any answer that suggests unconst b/c it is an excessive delegation of Congs power is a sucker answer Legislative vetos when cong attempts to overturn an executive decision w/ bicameralism and presentment (give bill to pres for veto) and line item vetos are unconst Cong may not delegate executive power to itself or its officers Fed Executive Power Foreign Policy Treaties prevail over state law if conflict w/ fed statute, last in time prevails Const is always superior Exec Agreement btw Pres and head of foreign nation used for ANY purpose prevail over state law but NEVER over fed law or Const as CIC to use American troops abroad MBE Pres always wins (unless better choice political question) Domestic Affairs Appointment power ambassadors, fed judges, officers of US Cong may vest the appoint of junior officer w/ Pres, heads of depts, or lower fed cts Cong may NOT give itself or its officers appointment power Cong may create a new agency where Pres appts SOME members and it appoints the rest Pres must appoint ALL officers Removal power unless removal limited by statute, Pres may fire any exec branch officer for cong to limit removal, it must be an office where independence from the Pres is desirable NOT a cabinet member Cong may not prohibit removal, only limit it to where there is good cause Impeachment and removal pres, vp, fed judges, and officers of the us can be impeached and removed for treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors impeachment (by House w/ majority) does not remove conviction by Senate (2/3) reqd Absolute Immunity Pres has AI to civil suits for $$$ damages for any action while in office but not for actions prior to office Executive Priv for presidential papers and conversations such priv yields to other important govern interests Pres MUST turnover papers for evidence in criminal proceeding Pres Pardon accused or convicted of fed crimes not civil Federalism Preemption Const, laws and treaties made pursuant to it, are the supreme law of the land Express preemption federal law says so right in it Implied preemption (when fed law silent on issue) states may establish environmental standards more strict than fed unless cong says otherwise if fed law occupies field, state law yields States may not tax or regulate the fed govern unconst to pay a state tax from the fed treas a private business on fed land can pay feds do not have to comply w/ state pollution control laws DCC and Priv and Immun Clause of Art IV Defs DCC undue burden on interstate commerce PIC of Art IV no state may deny citizens of other states of the privs and immuns it accords to its own citizens ONLY applies when discrim against out of staters PIC of 14A always a WRONG answer unless right to travel is at issue Always ask DOES THE STATE LAW DISCRIMINATE AGAINST OUT-OF-STATERS? If not, PIC of Art IV does NOT apply Check to see if law burdens on interstate commerce exceed benefits, violates DCC Mud flap case If it does discriminate against out-of-staters, if burdens interstate commerce, violates DCC unless necessary to achieve important govern purpose (Maine bait fish case) helping in-state economy at expense of other states is NEVER an important govern purpose except when state is market participant state may prefer its own citizens in receiving benefits from govern programs or in dealing w/ govern-owned businesses UMASS can charge residents less than out of staters State-owned concrete company can charge less to in-staters If law discriminates against out of staters w/ regard to their ability to earn their livelihood, it violates the PIC of Art IV unless necessary to achieve an important govern purpose Test law must discrim against out of staters must discrim w/ regard to civil liberties or important economic activities corps and aliens cannot use (must use DCC) discrim must be necessary to achieve an important govern purp no less discrim alt could achieve its objective cannot charge out of staters more for a COMMERCIAL fishing license but can charge them more for a recreational hunting license State taxation on interstate commerce States may not use their tax systems to help in-state businesses no tax break to purchases of in-state gasoline may not tax the hell out of out of state milk state may only tax activities that have a substantial nexus to the state state taxation of interstate business must be fairly proportioned state may tax trucker but only for the proportional amount of travel in that state Full faith and credit So long as ct rendering judgment had jurisdiction judgment was on merits judgment was final Consts Protection of Individ Liberties Must be govern action Private conduct need not comply However, Cong may apply const norms to private conduct 13A used to prohibit race discrimination private landlord cannot discriminate by race commerce power often used to apply const norms to private conduct Ollies BBQ Cong may NOT use sec 5 of 14A to regulate private behavior only state govt behavior Exceptions private conduct which MUST comply with Const public functions exception company town argues that it may discriminate against 1A b/c it is private NOT! entanglement exception when govt affirmatively authorizes, encourages, or facilitates unconst activity cts cannot enforce racially restrictive covenants govern cannot lease premises to restaurant that racially discriminates state cannot provide to schools that racially discriminate private entity that regulates interscholastic sports w/in entire state cannot discriminate a private school that is 99% funded w/ public $$$ MAY fire a teacher b/c of her speech mere govt subsidy is insufficient to constitute state action NCAA may order the suspension of a basketball coach at a state univ No state action when a private club w/ a liquor license from the state racially discriminates Application of the Bill of Rights Applies directly to feds Applies to states through dp clause of 14A except 2A 3A 5A right to grand jury indictment 7A right to jury trial in civil cases 8A right against excessive fines MASS essay: when state alleged to violate BOR, always say early on that it applies to state/local govt through its incorp in the dp clause of the 14A Levels of scrutiny RBT rationally related to a legitimate govt purpose Burden on challenger Intermediate substantially related to an important govt purpose Burden on govt Looks to govts ACTUAL purpose Strict necessary to achieve a compelling govt purpose Burden on govt Looks to govts actual purpose Means employed MUST be least restrictive Due Process Procedural DP Has there been a deprivation of life, liberty, or property? Deprivation of liberty occurs if loss of significant freedom provided by Const or statute (written law) Notice and hearing to institutionalize an adult Screening for parent to institutionalize a child Harm to reputation itself is not a loss of liberty Prisoners rarely have liberty interests Deprivation of property occurs if there is an entitlement and it is not fulfilled NO more distinction btw right and privilege an MBE answer that tries to distinguish btw the two is wrong choice Govt employee promised he will have his job for one year and then loses it midway through has been denied a property interest Govt negligence is NOT sufficient for deprivation of DP m/b at least recklessness In emergency sit, must shock the conscience for govt liability high-speed police chase ending in innocent perss life = no liability = no intent to cause harm Govts failure to protect people from privately inflicted harm does not deny DP Govts failure to protect child from fathers abuse = no DP viol If govt creates danger or has person in custody, maybe liable What procedure is reqd? test: balance importance of individs interest ability of additional procedures to increase the accuracy of the fact finding govts interest examples terminate welfare benefs n&h terminate SSD benefs post-termination hearing public school discipline student notice of charges and opp to explain terminate parental rights n&h punitive damage award jury instructions and judicial review grossly excessive pun dam = DP viol American citizen detained as enemy combatant must be given DP Except in exigent circs, govt seizure of assets or pre-judgment attachment n&h Does NOT req innocent owner defense if wife loses family car b/c husband got caught in it w/ prostitute = too bad, so sad Substantive DP Does govt have adequate reason to take away life, liberty, or property? Const provides only minimal protection for economic liberties RBT for economic rights Takings Clause Govt may take private prop for public use if it pays compensation Is there a taking? possessory taking physical occupation regulatory taking leaves no reasonable economic viable use simply decreasing prop value is NOT enough to constitute a taking taking m/b justified by a benefit that is roughly proportionate to burden imposed or a taking prop owner my challenge as a taking even if reg existed prior to taking ownership temporary denial owners use is not a taking so as long as govt action is reasonable moratorium on development rights while environ impact study done is reasonable Is it for public use? if not, give it back only reqs govts reasonable belief that taking will benefit public Is just compensation paid? measured as loss to owner NOT value in govts hands reasonable market value in owners hands Contracts Clause no state shall impair obligations of contracts Applies ONLY to state w/ EXISTING contracts State interference w/ private Ks = intermediate scrutiny Does law substantially impair partys rights under an existing K if so, is the law reasonably and narrowly tailored means of promoting an important and legitimate public interest State interference w/ govt Ks requires SS Or else govt would get out of its own Ks w/ no problem Privacy is a fund right protected under subst due process marriage ss procreate ss custody of children ss keep family together ss control upbringing of ones children ss contraceptives ss abortion prior viability undue burden 24 hr wait period = not undue performed by license doc no undue prohibit partial birth abortion undue after viability state may prohibit unless necessary to protect womans life or health govt has no duty to subsidize or provide in public hospitals spousal consent and notification = unconst parental notice and consent = const w/ judicial bypass private consensual homosexual activity = protected refuse medical treatment competent adults may refuse state may req clear and convincing evid state may prevent family from terminating treatment of a member physician assisted suicide = no right Equal Protection Whenever there is different treatment btw different people, ask What is the classification What level of scrutiny Does this law meet that level of scrutiny Const provisions concerning EP Applies only to the states via 14A Applies to the feds via DP cl of 5A Classifications based on race and national origin SS How to prove existence of race class exists on face if facially neutral, prove impact and intent to discrim police officer must pass test even though more blacks perform poorly = NO viol b/c no intent discrim use of peremptories based on race violates Race classes benefiting (benign) are treated the same as invidious SS quotas req clear proof of past discrimin m/b remedy for clearly proven past discrim each time a white officer is promoted, a black officer m/b promoted until effects of prior discrimin remedied schools may use race as BUT one factor in admissions must not set aside slots or add points to admission seniority systems may not be disrupted for affirmative action Gender classifications Interm Scrut exceedingly persuasive justification test How to prove gender classif face only men may attend VMI = clear on face if facially neutral, prove discrim impact and intent to be a cop, m/b certain height and weight = RBT unless can show intent to disadvantage women How to treat gender class benefiting women interm scrut based solely on stereotypes = unconst b/c perpetuates destructive stereotypes female widows automatically entitled to survivor benefits but male must prove need = unconst designed to remedy past discrimin allowed SSA used different formula for calculating female benefs to accommodate long history of disparate wages = const Alienage classifications SS only US citizens can receive welfare benefs = unconst exceptions RBT for alienage classifications that concern self-government and democratic process Voting, police officers, jury service, teacher, probation officer RBT when Congress discriminates against aliens Int Scrut for discrim against alien children Alien children cannot be made to pay for otherwise free public education Legitimacy classifications Int Scr used when class is based on childrens parents who were not married Denying benefs to ALL non-marital children but granting to marital children = unconst marital child could inherit but nonmarital could not unconst ALL else gets RBT RBT for all other types of discrimin Age Disability Wealth Economic regs ordinance granting pushcart vendors license to only applicants w/ 8 years experience = RBT sexual orientation = RBT Romer banning all laws protecting homosexuals = unconst Fund rights protected under EP Travel prevent people from moving INTO state = SS durational residency reqs = SS must live in state for one year to recv welfare = unconst must reside in state for 50 days to vote = const restrictions on foreign travel = RBT Vote right to vote cannot be denied based on race = 15A laws that deny some citizens right to vote = SS poll taxes = unconst property ownership reqd to vote or hold office = unconst exception water district election one person, one vote at-large elections const unless proof of discrimin purp use of race to draw election district lines = SS counting uncounted votes w/o any standards viol EP (Bush v. Gore) NO fund right to education under EP First Amend Free speech methodology Content-based v. content neutral content-based restrictions = SS types subject matter no picketing in residential neighborhoods unless concerns labor protest = unconst prohibiting judicial candidates from speaking on certain issues = unconst viewpoint pro-war speech allowed but anti-war not = unconst prior restraint order stopping speech before it occurs SS Procedurally proper orders m/b complied w/ or else barred from later challenging it Gag orders on press to prevent pretrial publicity = unconst May req license for speech only w/ important reason for licensing and clear criteria leaving almost no discretion to licensing auth vagueness and overbreadth vague reasonable person must guess as to what is prohibited prohibit any book tending to corrupt the morals of youth is vague overbreadth regulates too much speech all live entertainment prohibited in order to curb nude dancing is a little extreme fighting words laws = unconst vague and overbroad symbolic speech govt can regulate conduct that communicates if important interest unrelated to suppression of the message and impact is no greater than necessary flag burning is protected nude dancing is not draft card burning is NOT protected b/c it interferes w/ govt effort to mobilize for war burning cross = protected unless done w/ intent to threaten limits on campaign contribs = const but limits on candidates spending = unconst anonymous speech = protected Unprotected or less protected Incitement of illegal activity if substantial likelihood of imminent activity and speech is directed at causing it (m/b opportunity present to incite or mere words not unlawful) Obscenity test must appeal to prurient interest community standard m/b patently offensive under the specific law taken as whole, must lack serious redeeming artistic, literary, political or scientific value national standard may use zoning to regulate location of adult stores ANY child porn banned regardless of whether obscene may not punish obscene material in private possession unless child porn govt may seize ALL assets of business convicted of viol obscen laws (cars, boats, everything) profane and indecent speech usually protected except over free broadcast media in schools schools may punish for potty mouth Commercial speech advertising for illegal activity, false or deceptive ads = unprotected true comm. Speech that inherently risks deception may be prohibited optometrists prohibited from advertising under trade name = const attorney prohibited from in-person solicitation for profit = const okay to solicit in person if offering free service letters are okay other comm. Speech regulated = interm scr attys cannot solicit accident victims until 30 days after accident = const reg of comm. Speech m/b narrowly tailored but it does NOT have to be least restrictive Defamation public official = falsity and actual malice by clear and conv evid public figure = same as public official private figure and public concern = falsity and negligence presumed (automatic by statute) or punitive damages req actual malice private figure and private concern = falsity and negligence BUT presumed or punitive damages do NOT req actual malice Privacy may not create liability for truthful reporting of info lawfully obtained from govt press may report rape vics name as long as lawfully obtained may not create liability if medial broadcasts illegally intercepted called IF medial did not participate in the illegality AND it involves public matter govt may limit ITS OWN dissemination of info to protect privacy press has 1A right to attend crim trials other content-based restrictions = SS Places avail for speech Public forums govern property that is const required to make avail for speech (sidewalks, parks) m/b subj matter and viewpoint neutral or else SS m/b time, place, or manner reg that serves important govt purpose and leaves open adequate alternatives need NOT use least restrictive alternative to use city park, must use city sound engineers = const official cannot have unfettered discretion Limited Public forums govt property that govt could close to speech but chooses to open same rule as public forum school facilities Non-public forums property govt can and does close to speech may regulate as long as reasonable and viewpoint neutral military bases areas outside jail advertising space on city buses no political ads on city buses but comm. Advertising okay = const sidewalks on post office airports No 1A right of access to private prop for speech purps no right to use privately owned shopping centers for speech purps Freedom of Association SS to punish membership in group, must prove that person actively affiliated w/ group knowing of its illegal activities w/ specific intent of furthering those illegal activities req disclosure of membership in group, where such disclosure would chill membership, = SS prohib group from discriminating = const UNLESS they interfere w/ intimate association or expressive activity Nazi party may keep out Jews Boy Scouts may get rid of gay scoutmaster I can keep out anybody I choose at my dinner party Freedom of Religion Free Exercise Clause cannot be used to challenge neutral law of general applicability Peyote case = const MBE loves to try to apply the FEC to a neutral law govt may not deny benefs to individs who quit job for religious reasons Establishment Clause test m/b secular purpose primary purp cannot be to advance religion no Ten Commandments in classroom effect m/b neither to advance nor inhibit religion nativity scene alone on state house lawn = unconst nativity scene w/ flamingos and other non-religious stuff = const Ten Commandments on courthouse steps okay when w/ other items denoting history not religion m/b no excessive entanglement w/ religion govt cannot pay teachers salary in parochial school even if they teach only secular subjects cannot discrimin against religious speech or among religions unless SS no govt sponsored religious activity in public school even if student-led may give assistance to parochial school so long as not used for religious instruction may provide vouchers if they can be used for ANY private school dH*+LUW$_'h;o & F & F & F & F & F & F$a$d 2 c  < W i  d   > W {  & F & F & F & F & F & F .r bvCYq:Ux\ & F & F & F & F & F & F(,iy.G|0A & F & F & F & F & F & F & FAS{ 7L+@uVFt & F & F & F & F & F & F,2\ G !!>!!"""###$N$y$$$ & F & F & F & F & F & F & F$f%%%%+&t&& ''*'Q'h'{''''(9(f((( )D)_))) & F & F & F & F & F & F)*K***(+++,_,,,,,,,,-;---.4.x.... & F & F & F & F & F & F../7/C/Q///%0V0001y11K222:3{33334O4_4 & F & F & F & F & F & F & F_4h4445!5_555696666$7<7K77778G888L99 & F & F & F & F & F & F & F999 :%:[::::,;m;; <B<|<<<<<< ==2=P=t=== & F & F & F & F & F=1>\>>>>>#?c????? @6@U@x@@@@@A=AAABB & F & F & F & F & FBC|CCCCCCDJDDDD.EEE&F?FBFyFFFG & F & F & F & F & FGJGwGGG'H}HHHHHI IIsIIIIIJ8JrJJJJK0KEK & F & F & F & FEKKKKK!LcLLLLLLLMSMMMMNNiNN)OCOOO & F & F & F & F & F & F & FOOAPsPQ1QEQQQ+RHRfRRS"S'S]SSS1TeTT U;UBU\UU & F & F & F & F & FUUU)VkVVVVWgWWW X4XoXXX+Y3YYY^ZZZZ[h[ & F & F & F & F & Fh[[\,\d\\\]]T]]]]]^*^3^j^^^^^_;_u__=`Z` & F & F & F & FZ`````!a5ahaaaaa b+b^bbb1c[ccc5dIddd & F & F & F & F & F 1h/ =!"#$% i8@8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH <A@< Default Paragraph Font` z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z .Fy &-$3 8>}DIO^V\`:L.>[v8 ) ? 2 4 @A+LUW$_'h;o2c<Wid  > W { . r b v C Y q   : U x \(,iy.G|0AS{ 7L+@uVFt,2\G> N y f!!!!+"t"" ##*#Q#h#{####$9$f$$$ %D%_%%%&K&&&('''(_(((((((();)))*4*x*****+7+C+Q+++%,V,,,-y--K...:/{////0O0_0h0001!1_111292222$3<3K33334G444L5555 6%6[6666,7m77 8B8|888888 9929P9t9991:\:::::#;c;;;;; <6<U<x<<<<<=====>><>g>> ?>?|??????@J@@@@.AAA&B?BBByBBBCJCwCCC'D}DDDDDE EEsEEEEEF8FrFFFFG0GEGGGGG!HcHHHHHHHISIIIIJJiJJ)KCKKKKALsLM1MEMMM+NHNfNNO"O'O]OOO1PePP Q;QBQ\QQQQ)RkRRRRSgSSS T4ToTTT+U3UUU^VVVVWhWWX,XdXXXYYTYYYYYZ*Z3ZjZZZZZ[;[u[[=\Z\\\\\!]5]h]]]]] ^+^^^^^1_[___5`I```00 0 0 0+ 0L 0U 0U 0L 0L 0 0 0 0$ 0 0 0 0 0L 0h 0+ 0 0 0 0o 0o 0 0 0+ 0 0 0 0 0+ 0 0 0 0 0 0W 0i 0 0 0i 0W 0  0  0W 0W  0 0  0  0  0  0  0r  0r  0  0r  0  0  0  0 0C  0Y  0q  0Y  0  0Y  0  0  0Y  0U  0U  0U  0  0Y  0 0 0 0 0 0 0Y  0( 0C  0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0G 0G 0G 0 0 00 0A 0A 0A 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 0@ 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0F 0t 0F 0 0 0, 0, 0, 0 0G 0 0 0 0G 0 0> 0> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0y  0 0 0f! 0! 0! 0f! 0f! 0t" 0 0 # 0# 0# 0# 0 0{# 0# 0# 0# 0$ 0# 0f$ 0# 0# 0 % 0D% 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0(' 0% 0% 0{# 0_( 0_( 0( 0( 0( 0( 0( 0( 0( 0_( 0) 0) 0) 04* 04* 0) 0* 0* 0* 0 07+ 0C+ 0Q+ 0+ 0+ 0+ 0+ 0Q+ 0, 0, 0, 0- 0K. 0, 0. 0. 0C+ 0/ 0/ 0/ 0/ 0/ 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0!1 0_0 0_0 01 02 07+ 02 02 02 02 0<3 0K3 03 03 03 03 03 03 04 0K3 05 05 0K3 0 6 0 6 02 06 06 06 0,7 06 07 02 0B8 0B8 0B8 0B8 0B8 0B8 0B8 0 9 09 09 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0B8 0B8 0: 0: 0: 0 B8 0 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 06< 06< 0; 0< 0< 0< 0< 0= 0= 0< 0= 0= 0> 0<> 0= 0> 0= 0; 0|? 0? 0|? 0? 0? 0? 0@ 0|? 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0A 0; 0&B 0?B 0&B 0yB 0B 0yB 0yB 0JC 0; 0C 0C 0'D 0C 0; 0D 0D 0D 0D 0 E 0D 0sE 0; 0E 0E 0E 0F 0F 0E 0E 0F 0F 0G 0G 0EG 0F 0F 0F 0F 0E 0 0H 0H 0H 0H 0H 0H 0H 0H 0I 0H 0I 0J 0J 0I 0H 0)K 0CK 0)K 0K 0)K 0)K 0sL 0sL 0sL 0sL 0sL 0)K 0H 0HN 0fN 0HN 0O 0"O 0"O 0"O 0O 0O 0O 0O 0O 0 Q 0;Q 0;Q 0HN 0Q 0Q 0Q 0Q 0kR 0kR 0Q 0R 0Q 0HN 0S 0S 0S 04T 0S 0T 0HN 0+U 03U 0+U 0+U 0^V 0HN 0H 0V 0W 0W 0W 0X 0W 0V 0X 0X 0V 0Y 0Y 0Y 0Y 0Y 0Y 0Y 0V 03Z 0H 0Z 0Z 0Z 0Z 0Z 0Z 0Z 0[ 0[ 0[ 0H 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0] 0] 0] 0] 0] 0+^ 0+^ 0+^ 0] 01_ 0] 0] 0_ 0] 0I`d3 A$)._49=BGEKOUh[Z`d46789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGd5es_cIPeijn: = . 1 2 7 Y _ (.8>glqx5:{EIt{ ,15<CJ   y !{####$%%%&&&&'''((())))))**j*n***********y-}---{......:/@/~//////O0U0z000000001 11111222!222K3O3334425655555N6T6777777880838j8o888888888889 999T:[:;;;";<<5=<=====>>2>;>_>f>>>??????0@7@@@@@@AAAAAAA&B.BgBnBqBxBBBJCMCNCSCXC_CCCCC/D5DuD|DDDDDDDEEEEEE-F2F[F_FjFqF=GDGXG]GwG~GGGGGKIRIIIIIJJJJ7KBKKKWL^LLL~MMMM#N*NPPPPSSSSS!SgSjSTTT TTTUUUUUU^VbVVVlWpWWWWWXXXX2Y6YdZiZZZu[x[[[h]l]z]]]]]]^^[_____`````2;ch<G df  > C {   : < x \_il|S^+6@Dt{>@  N S y !!!"+"0"t"y"""*#,#Q#Y#h#p#9$@$f$n$D%J%_%f%%%%%&&K&Q&&&&&(')'''((..////00O0U0_0g0h0q000001 1!1)1_1f192;233334 4G4M44445L5V55555%6-6[6e6m7o7|888888888889 9999P9Y9t9|999991:8:\:d::::::::;#;(;c;l;<<====C===>><>=>g>k>>> ??>?G???????@@J@L@@@@@.A4AAABBFByBB}DDE!EsEyEEEF"F8F?@ABCDEFGHJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnoprstuvwxz{|}~Root Entry Fu%ˋ1TableIvOWordDocument"SummaryInformation(qDocumentSummaryInformation8yCompObjjObjectPoolu%ˋu%ˋ  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q