ࡱ> 352E@  bjbj (& |||||||       ceeeeee$R"| ||  J J J | | cJ cJ .J x ||?  bp  c0,  : ?|||| |?$ " J % 9 D 4  The Craft of Argument Key points for chapters one and two Good argument entails cooperation rather than combat. It is based on understanding alternative perspectives, and it is based on respect. Ethos is your character. It is your reputation as a thinker. Consider what sort of reputation you wish to build. Pragmatic arguments are constructed for the purpose of doing something. These arguments mean to compel action. The words should and would in an argument usually signal that a pragmatic argument will follow. Conceptual arguments are about understanding a problem better. These arguments entail research and aim to broaden the view. Some critics claim that what finally counts in the political world is not logic and evidence, but power and influence, so rational arguments are exercises in futility (7). 3 forms of persuasion that arent arguments Negotiation any reason can be offered in order to reach a desired outcome Propaganda reasons dont have to be good, and they often exploit emotions Coercion solves problems by threat or by bribe Stories as argument Stories can often be effective vehicles for proving ones point. They often compel more deeply felt emotions/ reactions than do arguments. A story often pretends to describe truth, in all its detail. Arguments are more abstract. They must offer reasons and claims. A good story will often compel less immediate disagreement with the teller. The listener is usually more concerned with finding out what happens next, rather than with disagreeing. When we tell a story, questions of it tend to seem like questions into our own truthfulness. When we write a thoughtful argument, we expect readers to question our reasons, our evidence, our logic, even the need for an argument, and we do not take offense at their doubts. A story can indeed make particular claims and provide reasons, and it can be analyzed for these, even though stories and arguments differ in format. In this class, we will be analyzing the stories that people tell in order to decipher the claims that various authors and characters are making. We will look into what makes these stories so visceral, and we will begin to investigate the truth of the claims that authors and characters are making. Logos, Pathos and Ethos Logos appeal to logic Pathos appeal to emotion Ethos projecting our character as a writer in order to appeal to our audience Skimming techniques given on p. 13 Imagining your audience Envision your readers as amiable but feisty friends sitting across the kitchen table, interrupting you with hard questions, objections, and their own views (15). [I]magine someone who is smart, amiable, and open-minded, but inclined to disagree with you; write to that person (16). The writing process Thinking-Reading-Talking Get an overview of the problem Preparing and Planning Decide whether you are making a pragmatic or conceptual argument Determine who your audience is Outline Drafting Revising [E]ven a written argument is a collaborative dialogue with other voices, real ones when possible, but often a voice that you must imagine on your readers behalf (22). 5 kinds of questions in building an argument 1. Whats your point? What are you saying, in a nutshell? In short, what are you claiming that I should do or believe? 2. Why should I agree? What reasons can you offer to support your claim? 3. On what facts do you base those reasons? How do we know they are good reasons? What evidence do you have to back them up? 4. Whats your logic? What underlying principle do you assume that holds your argument together? 5. But have you considered? But what would you say to someone who argued that.? Do you acknowledge this alternative to your position, and how would you respond? Planning an Argument: Sketch the problem or question and a plausible solution or answer. Write the main reasons that would encourage readers to agree. Sketch the evidence or additional reasons that support each main reason. Sketch out relevant objections and alternative that readers might raise; respond. Sketch a conclusion. *What is the best or worst of the myths of New Orleans? Why? *Should we work to get rid of our urban myths? Why or why not? *What do myths of cities obscure? *What kind of character is the city of New Orleans? <=< E  : a e f 4 H n"nopݷݷԦԟᚆx hEhE hthEhEhEhi5hEhE5 hE5 h'/h'/ h'/5hihIDhID6hID hi5hiht5 h'/ht h'/6h'/ ht6ht ht5hiht5CJaJhiht56CJaJ,<=; < 9 : f  3 4 H V "4 /FopbEF & Fgd )gd )p!&45 hlh )hbh )5h-hththEhi5htht5 456s  gdl^gdl & Fgd ) &1h:p#2/ =!"#$%@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k@(No ListHH #| Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ  &<=;< 9:f34HV" 4  / F o p  b EF456s  000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0(0 p    8@0(  B S  ?{B${Baa ll 9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity   \ n !&   Preferred CustomerP2uƅ^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.P2         V,F,:>' ==4xl| k, _ 1 sQ  < j  ' ~%|O} * ~  ^r bP]6j{ xbG[zB67B +^x1 7 ?B {s !_!M";#[#y%z(&@q&a'|{'(),)*~f* +3+i+/->-P-S-'//R0<1#2J2O2%3_3VR41h5u5C-617K67vA7E7I9f:JL;8=R>3s>p&?{oAHIB`fB>iBrB`oCJCD!E(F-:FjF5'GGGOIJ& JlJKPvKxLLMG;MlGM\N`N[cNOp OO:O PX"P|IP R5RdiR SV*S@S:rTwT UUYUbUeU55VWW)W!gWpXqYY?ZJZOZ[a>[D \`h\]%z]^&^*m_ ccFaekgekje fDm<nLn^n6o^p&q.q~q r3rcr's:sRtsu$`vRwhw#|bP}Y~K~9M~n~7u~!%h>1TkO&Im~mv.TUk7WXvACz7{vuNK:<iNk<&e8>=*|:)8Gj~NXS__z+^Ql)1&X0Z+f3Pud1$iYA$E,%P|'p0~r6vID-:GL @LUwhdnF7Frx x=KRaTXo&88yB 3?;C6O c3g lpxgJ9q,(-rQ[u7rENlURo /[sonxt4$b'NutIi )a9X\' dcd@gT@gT՜.+,0H hp  ('pocket mice and lovers of jesse hoppes <The Craft of Argument Key points for chapters one and two Title  !#$%&'()+,-./014Root Entry Fkp61TableWordDocument(&SummaryInformation("DocumentSummaryInformation8*CompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q