ࡱ> { Wbjbjzz GgOrbbbbbvvv8dv ?D"P9>>>>>>>$QAD>b>bb>bbP9P9|57`NSQH6<9>0 ?b6DrD477Db7Dw^L!>>2 ?D (:  Personal Class Design Part II: Crisis Prevention Training for Patient Care Techs and Observation Assistants Claudette D. Johnson Grand Canyon University NUR 469 E: Seminar II May 16, 2013 Crisis Prevention Training for Patient Care Techs and Observation Assistants Everyday patients are treated and cared for without incidents in hospital settings. The complicated issues involving our economy, everyday life challenges, and diverse health diseases such as dementia, and alcohol abuse has compounded an individuals stress level. These factors increase the likelihood of an outburst, thus, placing patients and healthcare workers at risk. The article, To err is Human: Building a Safer Health System (Kohn, Corrigan & Donaldson, 1999), reported an increased number of incidences jeopardizing the safety of patients and healthcare workers. Longo (2010) reports that unsafe incidences has led to patient and staff injury, prolonged hospital stays, claims of disability and even loss of life. Factors influence patient safety. In certain circumstances, the tendency is to blame patients for risky behavior and healthcare workers for errors in decision-making (Nath & Marcus, 2006). However, certain diseases are difficult to control (Alzheimer, Dementia, Brain injury), human behavior is unpredictable (Mentally ill and intoxicated patients) and healthcare workers still need to care for all patient population. The focus on strategies targeting education for the workforce group with the least training yet the most interaction with potentially disruptive patients is necessary. The inclusion of attention in understanding how factors contribute to safety incidences and creation of education focused on practical application of techniques in healthcare settings can reduce risk of injury (CPI, 2013). Empowerment of healthcare providers impacts the rate of disruptive incidences in inpatient settings (Druss, 2007). Institution Philosophy The program is designed to address identified issues in clinical care to promote patient safety. The purpose of the program is to heighten awareness and provide skills to prevent and minimize injury for the observation assistants (OA) and patient care tech (PCT). The program complies with the legislative mandates and regulatory and accreditation standards set by the Joint Commission (Longo, 2010). The program minimizes the institutions exposure to liability. Furthermore, the training promotes the NCH vision of providing safety and security of the staff and patients (NCH, 2013). Program Goal The crisis intervention training is designed to teach best practice and evidence based principles in managing disruptive behaviors and difficult situations in the workplace (Crisis Prevention Intervention, 2013). OAs and PCTs will learn how to identify at-risk individuals and families and utilize verbal and non-verbal techniques to diffuse hostile or belligerent behavior in the workplace. The participants will self-examine reaction to a crisis situation and learn skills to control fears and anxiety and avoid injury when dealing with difficult situations. The program is created to address workplace safety, positive communication skills and early intervention through recognition of signs of escalation. Needs Assessment Lack of appropriate training and poor communication between patient, healthcare providers and families is a contributing factor is linked to safety incidences (Health Canada, 2007). In general, improvement in communication is associated with improvement in safety (Druss, 2007). The Northwest Community Hospitals (NCH) Safety Committee and Employee Health Department (2013) reports a 3% increase of injuries from Mr. Strong events with forty percent (40%) of the injuries involve Patient Care Techs (PCT) and ten percent (10%) are Observation Assistants (OA). NCH has a Mr. Strong policy, used to summon security to support staff in managing escalating patients and difficult incidents that threatens the safety of staff, patients and visitors. Mr. Strong request are up by 5% compared to 1-2 % in previous years. Mr. Strong post-vention survey reveals an increasing dementia population. The two highest patient populations in Mr. Strong incidents are the elderly (50%), mental health diagnosis (18%), alcohol related (12%) and the rest are related to disgruntled families and other issues. Crisis Prevention Intervention Programs for nurses, security, mental health staff and Emergency Department personnel are offered at NCH. The Safety Committee & Violence in the Workplace Committees recommends a program targeting education for the PCT and OA groups. In addition, survey of PCT and OA reveal that 60 % value their safety as a priority in their practice (NCH, 2013). Student Learning Objectives Learning objectives should be specific, measurable and attainable (Billings & Halstead, 2012). Objectives are distinguished between the elements of knowledge, attitudes and skills. The interaction between the skill, knowledge and attitude is necessary and just as equally valuable (Govaerts, 2008). After Day 1 lecture and PowerPoint presentations, the OAs and PCTs will identify and list three signs of stress, identify and list 3 ways of addressing crisis by completing a quiz at the end of Day 1. After Day 1 lecture on defusing Dos and Donts and discussion of case studies in the training session, OA & PCTs will list 2 Dos and Donts of defusing escalation, identify potentials for injury and list two (2) ways to prevent injury by completing a quiz at the end of Day 1 (Cognitive and Affective). After identification of resources lecture, OAs and PCTs will list the three (3) steps of reporting and list two (2) resources by completing a quiz at the end of day 2, and demonstrate the accessing computer reporting and locate employee injury report form (Cognitive, Psychomotor, Affective) After the lecture on techniques of safe distance, viewing video and role playing, the OAs and PCTs will demonstrate techniques of safe distance, perform how to escape certain holds, participate in constructive feedback for staff performance during application (Cognitive, Psychomotor, Affective) and demonstrate safety precaution (Cognitive & Psychomotor) and demonstrate safety precaution (Cognitive & Psychomotor). Lesson Plan Learner ObjectiveTimeframeTeaching Strategy & RationaleEvaluation Method & RationaleAfter Day 1 lecture and PowerPoint presentations, the OAs and PCTs will: identify and list three signs of stress identify and list 3 ways of addressing crisis by completing a quiz at the end of Day 1 Hour 1Day 1 Hour 1 15 min 15 min 5 minutes 20 minutes Overview (PowerPoint, handout, Questioning) Injury statistics Course content Objectives Strategies Outcome Understanding People in Crisis (Video, Handout, Discussion) Video of patient in crisis Situations, reasons why crisis occurs Stages of a Crisis (handout, discussion) The Stress Cycle (Handout of cycle & coping , 5 minute scenario vignette) Discussion on Identify signs of stress Ways to address stress How to handle stress  Observation- allows for assessment of behavior and responses to assess value and comfort in the topics covered. This allows for formative feedback and opportunity to correct information that is not clear to the learner. Question with verbal responses allows for clarification of misconceptions or misunderstood concepts. Observation- allows for assessment of behavior and responses to assess value and comfort in the topics covered. This allows for formative feedback and opportunity to correct information that is not clear to the learner. Questions allows for clarification and discussion of attitude and feelings. Observation evaluates attitudes and comfort in discussing stress situations Formative evaluation of responses to questions and recognition of attitudes and feelings  Learner ObjectiveTimeframeTeaching StrategyEvaluation MethodAfter Day 1 lecture on defusing Dos and Donts and discussion of case studies in the training session, OA & PCTs will: List 2 Dos and Donts of defusing escalation Identify potentials for injury and list two (2) ways to prevent injury By completing a quiz at the end of Day 1 (Cognitive and Affective) Day 1 Hour 2 10 minutes 30 minutes 20 minutes Intervention Tools: Handout and discussion (All cognitive domain, affective) Defusing Dos and Donts Case study Review (Discussion, Question, Role play) Quiz of Day 1 content Verbal Questioning- allows for critical thinking assessment, evidence of the why questions and shows mastery of the content information and evidence presented Both formative and summative feedback on acknowledgement of feelings and attitudes through anecdotal notes Questionnaire Summative feedback of Day 1 progress- Allows for evaluation of knowledge gained to be quantified and allows for remediation of information not absorbed by learners before the end of class.Learner Objective TimeframeTeaching StrategyEvaluation MethodAfter identification of resources lecture, OAs and PCTs will: list the three (3) steps of reporting and list two (2) resources by completing a quiz at the end of day 2 demonstrate the accessing computer reporting and locate employee injury report form (Cognitive, Psychomotor, Affective) Day 2 Hour 1 15 minutes 20 minutes 15 minutes Identification of resources: List of hospital resources and map algorithm (Cognitive, Affective ) Unit: Charge nurse, Manager, Director Members of VIWP Employee health Human Resource Reporting process- Lecture, Computer validation, Return Demonstration (Psychomotor, Cognitive) Occurrence report online Employee Injury report Review and location of policy- Handout, Lecture (Cognitive, Affective) Violence in the workplace Employee Health Policy  Concept map- allows students to express relationships of escalation of issue, identify resources and demonstrate their critical thinking skills. Allows for formative summation of performance feedback Observation- validates their cognitive knowledge on occurrence reporting and demonstrate understanding of the (computer) technical skill of reporting both occurrence and injury Same as above  Learner ObjectiveTimeframeTeaching StrategyEvaluation MethodAfter the lecture on techniques of safe distance, viewing video and role playing, the OAs and PCTs will: demonstrate techniques of safe distance perform how to escape certain holds, participate in constructive feedback for staff performance during application Demonstrate safety precaution (Cognitive & Psychomotor). Day 2 Hour 2 20 minutes 20 minutes 15 minutes 5 minutes Role Playing: Video, Actual Demonstration- Role playing, Discussion ( All Cognitive Domain, Affective) Situational Application Physical Stance Review of scripting Practice Verbal responses Critique of role playing Return demonstration (Psychomotor, Affective) Quiz on day 2 information Completion of program evaluation  Formative verbal feedback of psychomotor skills including observation evaluation of communication and problem solving skills Observation- allows for direct observation of performance Checklist verifies behavioral and clinical competence meeting expectations Summation at the end of return demonstration on performance during demonstration Quiz Questionnaire Summative feedback of Day 2 progress- Allows for evaluation of knowledge gained to be quantified and allows for remediation of information not absorbed by learners before the end of class. Questionnaire Method of Instruction & Rationale Keeping in mind the diversity of the audience not only in experience but also in age and ethnicity, a variety of media and learning style strategies will be used. Awareness of the needs of visual, tactile and auditory learner needs is important in ensuring the content, learning strategies and learning domain matches to be effective (Billings & Halstead, 2012). A video and vignette on patient in a stressful situations and demonstration of crisis prevention techniques on de-escalation and physical safety from CPI will attract visual learners. The use of PowerPoint presentation which includes the purpose, needs assessment and the agenda of the class and presented in an organize fashion the major points of the class gives audiences an overview of the content. The use of visual aids and bullets of the content can allow the main points of the class highlighted for easy recollection. Handouts on the Stages of Crisis and Stress cycle along with NCH Violence in the Workplace Policy, employee health Policy and tutorial on online occurrence reporting can provide resource for tactile staff for future reference. Content of de-escalation techniques and communication can be delivered in two forms: the handout and demonstration of role playing in the classroom of techniques of safe stance and how to release out of a hold when grabbed by a distressed individual. Role playing is a vehicle to explore emotions, gain insight into ones values, develop problem solving skill, and explore new outlook into the situation (Billings & Halstead, 2012). According to Amerson (2006), an intrapersonal learner works well observing the actions of others, is usually self-reflective as used in return demonstrations. Physical demonstration assesses the application of the understood concepts. Finally, case study presentations allow the participants to connect the theory to actual situations for easy assimilation to their practice (Billings & Halstead, 2012). Adult social learners can analyze and solve performance-based questions and improve their abilities unlike newer staff that would prefer structures content (Noble, Miller & Heckman, 2008). To conclude, a recap of take-away points is helpful to close the session. Creating a positive learning environment comes from understanding what is presented and also respecting and valuing everyone's contribution to the environment (Billings & Halstead, 2012). Evaluation Evaluation process is instrumental in assessing success of an educational program. An evaluation model is representative of ways that data or variables can be observed or clarified. A models advantage is the fact that it makes variables clear by clarifying priorities on which variables should be evaluated (Billings & Halstead, 2012). Selection of the model is dependent on the evaluation questions asked, the stakeholders needs and the course context (Billings & Halstead, 2013). This project even though theory driven fits more a decision-oriented model. CIPP model (context, input, process, and product) provides information for judging decision choices (Stufflebeam & Webster, 1994). The context assesses the need of the target population; input assess abilities of systems for program implementation; process detects implementation issues, and product evaluation (assess program outcomes). The CIPP process provides information useful for decision-makers (Billings & Halstead, 2012). In this particular class, the tool evaluates the abilities of participants to make decisions in maintaining safety of self and patients through this program. Selection of Evaluation Tool and Rationale Selection of tool to evaluate the progress of learner or of the program is critical in maintaining the quality of a program and assessing effectiveness in communicating context of the material presented. Selection of the tool is dependent on the question asked and the evaluation method (Billings & Halstead, 2012). Use of evaluation instruments for each learning objective and rationale for its use are outlined within the lesson plan outline. Program Evaluation Assessment of educational program strategies reflects on the effectiveness of program outcomes. The overall view of the learners perception on how the program meets the learners need is vital in maintaining the effectiveness of the program. The use of a reliable, proven tool such as a Lickert scale assessment of the participants view is used to assess the value and effectiveness of the whole program (Billings & Halstead, 2012). The use of open-ended comment section is valuable in pinpointing specific effective areas of value to the learner and identifies areas to improve. In the case of a new program, these feedbacks are instrumental in measuring the outcome of a new program and refine its effectiveness for future presentations. Conclusion A disruptive behavior in an atmosphere that requires individuals attention to maintain safety is dangerous and should be addressed. Injury caused by disruptive behaviors can be prevented (Peteet, Meyer, & Miovic, 2011). Addressing this issue requires a collaborative effort and accountability from healthcare workers (Wachter & Pronovost, 2009). Empowering staff with education to heighten awareness of interventions and techniques available to prevent injury is valuable in an organization. Designing an education curriculum requires awareness of the needs of the intended audience. Knowing the needs of the audience can ensure that the learning styles and learning strategies matches the resources provided. Clearly defined objectives are the key to ensuring clarity in the programs expectations. The use of creative teaching techniques to maximize interest and learning is the role of educators (Saxton, 2012). Use of strategies and appropriate evaluation tools to assess effectiveness of the learner and the program will strengthen the value of the program to meet intended learner needs. References Amerson, R. (2006). Energizing the nursing lecture: application of the theory of multiple intelligence learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(4), 194-196. Billings, D., & Halstead, J. (2012). Teaching in nursing: a guide for faculty (4th ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. CPI Institute (2013). Non-violent Crisis intervention. Retrieved from http://www.crisisprevention.com/Specialties/Nonviolent-Crisis-Intervention Druss, B. (2007). EMB and Quality Improvement research. Psychiatric Services. 58(10). doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.10.125 Govaerts, M.J. (2008). Educational competencies or education for professional competence? Medical Education, 42 (3):2346. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.03001.x Health Canada. (2007).The working conditions of nurses: Confronting the challenges. Strengthening the Policy-Research Connection, 13. 1-46. Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.ca/sr-sr/alt_formats/hpb-dgps/pdf/pubs/hpr-rps/bull/2007-nurse-infirmieres-eng.pdf Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M. & Donaldson, M. S. (1999). To Err is Human: Building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.providersedge.com/ehdocs/ehr_articles/To_Err_Is_Human_%20Building_a_Safer_Health_System-exec_summary.pdf Longo, J. (2010). Combating disruptive behaviors: Strategies to promote a healthy work environment. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(1), 3. Nath, S.B., & Marcus, S.C. (2006). Medical errors in psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 14(4).204-11. Noble, K., Miller, S., & Heckman, J. (2008). The cognitive style of nursing students: educational implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(6), 245-253. doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.gcu.edu:2048/10.3928/01484834-20080601-08 Northwest Community Hospital (NCH). (2013). Safety Committee Report January 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nch.org. Peteet, J. R., Meyer, F. L., & Miovic, M. K. (2011). Possibly Impossible Patients: Management of Difficult Behavior in Oncology Outpatients. Journal of Oncology Practice, 7(4), 242-246. doi:10.1200/JOP.2010.000122 Saxton, R. (2012). Communication skills training to address disruptive physician behavior. AORN Journal, 95(5), 602-611. Stufflebeam, D.L. & Webster, W.J. (1994). An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Assessment and Program Evaluation. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Shuster. Wachter, R.M. & Pronovost, P.J. (2009). Balancing no blame with accountability in patient safety. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(14). 14011406.     PAGE  PAGE 14 PERSONAL CLASS DESIGN Running head: PERSONAL CLASS DESIGN 1  &'(tu  !!b!ymf h"h"h"h"5OJQJhFICJOJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"6OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJhZOJQJhX+OJQJh^h^OJQJh^OJQJhFOJQJhFIOJQJhLyOJQJh[4OJQJ#(u  * d`gd" $da$gd" $da$gd[4 ! $Ifgd"$a$gd" & Fdgd"m$ & Fdgd" d`gd" !!c!!!!!^UHH;U h$If^hgd" & F$Ifgd" $Ifgd"kd$$Ifl\R$<  t0644 layt,b!c!!!!!!!!!""""""!"%")"*","0"4"5"7"b"c"ѐѐm]Oh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJ#h"h"5OJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsHhFICJOJQJaJmHsHh"CJOJQJaJmHsHhmCJOJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsH$h"h"CJOJQJaJmHsHh"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJ!!"""""""" " " " " """"""""""&"'"(")"*" $Ifgd"*"5"6"7"c"u"""""""""""""#(#)# $$Ifa$gd"m$$$If^`a$gd"m$$ & Fh$If^h`a$gd"m$ $Ifgd"m$ $Ifgd"c"t"u""""""""""""##'#)#*#<#R#T#V#f################$Ƭ䟑th"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJhm5CJOJQJaJh"5CJOJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJ')#*#S#T#U#V##############$$ $Ifgd"$ & Fh$If^h`a$gd"m$ $$Ifa$gd"m$$If^`gd"m$ $Ifgd"m$$$$$<%>%K%&&&&& &)&l&n&&&&'''''''Z'['((((((((((((ƹ䬥ueh"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"5OJQJh"h"5OJQJ h"h"h"h"OJQJaJh"5CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJ'$=%>%&&&&&& &m&n&&&'' $Ifgd"'''''','6'H'\TTTTKKK $Ifgd"$a$gd"kd$$Ifl \R$<  t0644 layt,H'Z'[''(H(q((REE & F $Ifgd"kdB$$Ifl\R$<  t06l44 layt, $Ifgd"((((((((((((((((((((((((((( $$Ifa$gd"m$ $Ifgd"(())6)7)=)p)r)u))))+*,*-*V*****i+j+k+|+}+++,,,񸪝~~wlwbh"OJQJaJh"5OJQJaJ h"h"h"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJ()7)8)9):);)<)=)q)r)s)t)u)))),*-*.*/*0*1** $Ifgd" $$Ifa$gd"m$ & FVL$If^V`Lgd"m$ $Ifgd"m$***j+k+}+~++++Pkd$$IflF\R$<  t06l44 layt" $Ifgd" +++V,,,,[PBBP9 $Ifgd" & F$Ifgd"m$ $Ifgd"m$kd$$Ifl\9 c$ *n + t0644 layt",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-- $Ifgd",,,,,- ----!-'-*-F-H-b-c-----------(.).A.B.Z.[.q.s.t.........ܻth"h"OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJ h"h"OJQJaJmHsHhFICJOJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsH$h"h"CJOJQJaJmHsH+-------------"-#-$-%-&-'-(-)-*-G-H-- $Ifgd"m$ $Ifgd"------).B.[.r.s.t....|| & FV$If^V`gd"m$$$If^`a$gd"m$$ & F$If^`a$gd"m$ $$Ifa$gd"m$ $Ifgd"m$$If^gd"m$ & F$If^`gd"m$.....//m0n0o0~000 $Ifgd" $Ifgd"m$ ...////l0o0~0000000222222󸱥}jYH7 h"h"OJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsH$h"h"CJOJQJaJmHsHh"h"OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJ h"h"h"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJ0000000YQAAAA$&`#$/Ifgd"$a$gd"kd2$$Ifl \9 c$ *n + t0644 layt"00-1V1|11VF222 & F $&`#$/Ifgd"$&`#$/Ifgd"kd$$Ifl\o $ :  t 6`0644 layt,1222222!2"2#2$2%2&2'2(2)2*2+262728292:2;2<2=2$&`#$/Ifgd" & F $&`#$/Ifgd"22 2+21252C2I2M2W2\2`2a2c22222222233 3!3:3;3<3=3ݻ|o|o|o|o|obTh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJ#h"h"5OJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsH h"h"OJQJaJmHsHhFICJOJQJaJmHsH$h"h"CJOJQJaJmHsH=2>2?2@2A2B2C2N2O2P2Q2R2S2T2U2V2W2a2b2c2222 & FV$&`#$/If^V`gd"m$$&`#$/Ifgd"m$$&`#$/Ifgd"223!3;3<3=3k3l3m3n3o3p3q3r3s3t3u3v3333333$&`#$/Ifgd" & FV$&`#$/If^V`gd"m$=3j3v33333333334<4=4F4S4444444455 5$535555666$6%6ǹᝬᖍvkh"5OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJhm5OJQJh"5OJQJ h"h"h"h"CJOJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJh"hm5OJQJaJhm5CJOJQJaJh"5CJOJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"5CJOJQJaJ$333333333=4>4?4@4A4B4C4D4E4F4444455 5355$&`#$/Ifgd"5556666D<<<$a$gd"kd$$Ifl_\o $ :  t 6`0644 layt,$&`#$/Ifgd"6%6??A(DSDF$F IIKdMeMfMgMhMiMjMkMlMmMnMoMpMqMrM d`gd"dgd" $da$gd"%6??(DSDF$FIIcMyMMMMN%NNNN.OfO~OPP{QQRRR2SRS^SSSʷʤtʷʷʷʷʍtc h"h"OJQJaJmHsH0h"h"6B*OJPJQJaJnHphtH-h"h"B*OJPJQJaJnHphtH$h"h"B*OJQJ\aJph$h"h"6B*OJQJaJph!h"h"B*OJQJaJphh"OJQJaJh"h"5OJQJaJh"h"OJQJaJ!rMsMtMuMvMwMxMyMM%NN.OODPCQ^RR^S^TTU0d-DM ^`0gd"0d7$8$H$^`0gd"0d^`0gd" $da$gd" d`gd"ST^TTTVV#VVVV1WUWfWgWhWjWkWmWnWpWqWsWtWzW{W|W~WWWW䩐||||rlrlhZPZh0JOJQJjh0JOJQJUh h0Jjh0JUh,jh,Uh[4OJQJ0h"h"6B*OJPJQJaJnHphtH-h"h"B*OJPJQJaJnHphtH$h"h"6B*OJQJaJph!h"h"B*OJQJaJphh"h"OJQJaJh"h"6OJQJaJU#VVfWgWiWjWlWmWoWpWrWsW|W}W~WWWWh]hgd_ &`#$gdi<h]hgdi< &`#$gdA0M $da$gd"0d7$8$H$^`0gd"0d^`0gd"WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWȽȱh[4OJQJh,h{OJQJhOJQJhhi<hOJQJhFOJQJhFIOJQJh0JOJQJjh0JOJQJUhv60JOJQJmHnHuWWWWW $da$gd"gd_  !dgdi<E 000P&P:pi</ =!"#$% Dp$$If!vh#v#v<#v #v :V l t0655<5 5 yt,$$If!vh#v#v<#v #v :V l t0655<5 5 yt,$$If!vh#v#v<#v #v :V l t06l55<5 5 yt,$$If!vh#v#v<#v #v :V lF t06l55<5 5 yt"$$If!vh#v #v*#vn #v+ :V l t065 5*5n 5+ yt"$$If!vh#v #v*#vn #v+ :V l t065 5*5n 5+ yt"$$If!vh#v #v'#vD #v" :V l t 6`065 5:5 5 yt,$$If!vh#v #v'#vD #v" :V l_ t 6`065 5:5 5 yt,^ 2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH D`D [4NormalCJOJQJ_HmH sH tH DA`D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List 4@4 [4Header  !.)@. [4 Page Number@P@@ [4 Body Text 2d`4 "4 ; $Footer  !pO2p Grand Canyon Referenceh1$^hKH OJQJ\^JaJ6U`A6 = Hyperlink >*B*phPK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3N)cbJ uV4(Tn 7_?m-ٛ{UBwznʜ"Z xJZp; {/<P;,)''KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd̛\17 pa>SR! 3K4'+rzQ TTIIvt]Kc⫲K#v5+|D~O@%\w_nN[L9KqgVhn R!y+Un;*&/HrT >>\ t=.Tġ S; Z~!P9giCڧ!# B,;X=ۻ,I2UWV9$lk=Aj;{AP79|s*Y;̠[MCۿhf]o{oY=1kyVV5E8Vk+֜\80X4D)!!?*|fv u"xA@T_q64)kڬuV7 t '%;i9s9x,ڎ-45xd8?ǘd/Y|t &LILJ`& -Gt/PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0C)theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] O :::qqtb!c"$(,.2=3%6SWW,035:?CGJNPR!!*")#$'H'((*+,--.001=22356rMUWW-./1246789;<=>@ABDEFHIKLMOQS !t!!8@0(  B S  ? ......... O O8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNameB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region9 *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace }   !*+-0$$$$$$%%%%****+*1*C*I*W*\*^KKgOiOjOlOmOoOpOrOsOOO%*4$$$$%%%!%*** *+*5*C*M*W*`*^KKgOiOjOlOmOoOpOrOsOOO tu!%*,04$$ %%%!%* *1*5*I*M*\*`*++++....lEyEgOiOjOlOmOoOpOrOsO{O~OOOOOOO tu!%*,04$$ %%%!%* *1*5*I*M*\*`*++++....lEyEgOgOiOjOjOlOmOoOpOrOsOOOOOOOOOOO MrLw Ol $}i=&.:(4C?"+QZRDX8D3&Feaxΰ$~&j}U^ ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo( **^*`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( j^j`OJQJo(o :^:`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( Oea$}&F4C? ~&j}ZRDMr&.                                                                                           FYKJ+fYl7BeT j bT:an("Q N"; $@)X+-`,0 }39=@rEA0M+VSsXZ4\"]^_U_J9b>bfafUnLy{^ }FI;vq[f75u% u2=4W,Hv6@Rmv[4FUVi<xO$e%| ."C]VgOiO ( Send to Bluetooth&{0BC9C674-86F5-40f8-BC67-526D0AA0B935}(( ݥ~rr~ݥury ާarrruzrrzާarrr|rrrzާarrr۟rݤ[|z|ݥ^rrݤӉtѫф"֓=ѫw rՎ|rtѫЁrrЃzrrtѫЃrrr|zrrr|rrr||rr|rrЃӋrӉ+ؖC׷urՐ۠rvЁzmsrrݥrrrzsrrr|rrzvrrr~wrzvrrrwӋrrӋp(@a9@''''O@Unknown G*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.@CalibriG=  jMS Mincho-3 fgO.  k9Lucida Sans Unicode?= *Cx Courier New;WingdingsA$BCambria Math"h}g}g C( C(!r4?O?O2qHX ?[42!xx !Running head: APA TYPING TEMPLATEGrand Canyon University mama johnson4         Oh+'0x $ D P \hpx$Running head: APA TYPING TEMPLATEGrand Canyon University,Seminar II Personal Design Part II Finalmama johnson2Microsoft Office Word@@Q@Q C՜.+,0 hp  Grand Canyon University(?O "Running head: APA TYPING TEMPLATE Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTVWXYZ[\^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FTQData U1Table]DWordDocument GSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStore`GQ`NSQJTL2MI1QER3DQ==2`GQ`NSQItem  PropertiesUCompObj r   F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q