ࡱ> |{ >qbjbj 7hhi,J J 8,\=,aawwwRRR+++++++$-0Z+RRRRR+ww+rrrRHww+rR+rr)hV*wp ԚkR*+ ,0=,"*40j0 V*V*0+RRrRRRRR++VRRR=,RRRR0RRRRRRRRRJ S: Notes on Pre-Socratic Philosophy Philosophy 131: Philosophy of Religion - Epperson Milesian School Thales of Miletus 624-548 Anaximander of Miletus 610-546 Anaximenes of Miletus fl. 545 Pythagorean School Pythagoras 580 - 500, founded school in Kroton Heracleitus of Ephesus 540 480, fl.504-501 Eleatic School Xenophanes Reputed founder, but no evidence. Parmenides Founder: Born 515, dialogue with Socrates, 451-449 Zeno 495 - 430 Empedocles of Akragas 490 - 430 Anaxagoras 500 - 428, came to Athens in 480 Atomist School Leucippus fl. 400 500; Of the Eleatic School, student of Zeno Democritus 460 370 THE MILESIAN SCHOOL Introduction THESIS: The genesis of Greek philosophy can be placed in the Ionian philosophical tradition. Ionia was the cradle of Greek philosophy; Miletus (modern day Turkey, city of Soke) was the cradle of Ionian philosophy. Aegean Greek culture submerged by the Dorian invasions of 11th century BC. Aegean spirit preserved by Ioniaphilosophy, literature, art, etc. Homer Ionian literature Ionian cosmology Greek mathematics influenced by Egyptian mathematics; Greek astronomy influenced by Babylonian astronomy; but neither were derived from these. Greek math was more theoretical than Egyptian; Greek astronomy more empirical than Babylons astrological divinations. Unique to Greece: Desire to discover the essence of things. Knowledge for its own sake. Not tied to religious exclusivity (as Indian philosophy, etc.) Not tied to practical benefits, either (Eastern philosophy = ways of avoiding unhappiness, etc) Thales of Miletus 624-548 Anaximander of Miletus 610-546 Anaximenes of Miletus fl. 545 Thales of Miletus: The earliest Ionian philosopher. Focused on change from birth to death via growth and change. Attempted to discern the primary substance undergoing changei.e., the permanence underlying an ever changing world. Here the concept of primary substance is defined NOT as matter in the conventional sense; instead, the idea of primary substance is that of arch i.e., the origin of all things and/or the defining principle of all things.) Various Ionian philosophers differed on their notions of primary substance, but all held it to be material. Thales = water Anaximenes = air Heraclitus = fire Not sheer materialists though because no distinction between spirit and matter. Ionians were then more primitive scientists than philosophers in the strict sense of the word. Did more than merely observe, though: used speculative thought to theorize the fundamental characterization of the various primary substances. Therefore, Ionian materialism is more an abstract materialism than modern empirical materialism. The idea is that unity is fundamental: Unity in difference, and difference entering in to Unity. Also, a law-governed universe where balance is the governing principle. Thales of Miletus Predicted the eclipse of 585 bc according to Herodotus; died in 546; almanac, navigation via ursa minor. Water is the primary substance. Water becomes air through heat; becomes ice (and by extrapolation, earth) via cold. First to raise the question of the ultimate, fundamental nature of the world. First to raise the notion of Unity in Difference. Aristotle, the major source for Thales's philosophy and science, identified Thales as the first person to investigate the basic principles, the question of the originating substances of matter and, therefore, as the founder of the school of natural philosophy. Thales was interested in almost everything, investigating almost all areas of knowledge, philosophy, history, science, mathematics, engineering, geography, and politics. He proposed theories to explain many of the events of nature, the primary substance, the support of the earth, and the cause of change. Thales was much involved in the problems of astronomy and provided a number of explanations of cosmological events which traditionally involved supernatural entities. His questioning approach to the understanding of heavenly phenomena was the beginning of Greek astronomy. Thales's hypotheses were new and bold, and in freeing phenomena from godly intervention, he paved the way towards scientific endeavour. He founded the Milesian school of natural philosophy, developed the scientific method, and initiated the first western enlightenment. The questions which excited [the Milesians] were of this kind: Can this apparently confused and disordered world be reduced to simpler principles so that our reason can grasp what it is and how it works? What is it made of? How does change take place? . . . They abandoned mythological and substituted intellectual solutions. . . . [It] was no longer satisfying to say that storms were roused by the wrath of Poseidon, or death caused by the arrows of Apollo or Artemis. A world ruled by anthropomorphic gods of the kind in which their contemporaries believed gods human in their passions as well as in their outward form was a world ruled by caprice. Philosophy and science start with the bold confession of faith that not caprice but an inherent orderliness underlies the phenomena, and the explanation of nature is to be sought within nature itself. . . . (Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. A history of Greek philosophy. Vol.1, The earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 44-45) Aristotle defined wisdom as knowledge of certain principles and causes (Metaph. 982 a2-3). He commenced his investigation of the wisdom of the philosophers who preceded him, with Thales, the first philosopher, and described Thales as the founder of natural philosophy (Metaph. 983 b21-22). He recorded: 'Thales says that it is water'. 'it' is the nature, the arch, the originating principle. For Thales, this nature was a single material substance, water. To Aristotle, the theories of Thales were so obviously different from all that had gone before that they stood out from earlier explanations. Thales's views were not ancient and primitive. They were new and exciting, and the genesis of scientific conjecture about natural phenomena. It was the view for which Aristotle acknowledged Thales as the founder of natural philosophy. Anaximander of Miletus Younger associate of Thales; believed the primary substance (again, where substance is defined not as matter in the conventional sense; instead, the idea of primary substance is that of arch i.e., the origin of all things and/or the defining principle of all things.) For Anaximander, this primary substance / arch was necessarily indeterminate or boundless. This is because only the boundless is incapable of further reduction to some more fundamental arch . At the same time, any definite or limited substance would ultimately be reduced to its primary, unbounded substancesince the latter has no limits restricting its encroachments into other, non-primary substances. Therefore, if the primary substance were water per the thesis of Thales, everything would ultimately have been reduced to water long ago, which isnt the case. The primary substance as arch, for Anaximander, is substance without limits. Encroachments of one element upon another (heat in winter, cold in summer) are considered injustices. Eternal motion brings things into being. Vortex-like, so that the heavier elements are central and the lighter elements tend toward the circumference. The world is not a flat disc of water, but rather a short spinning cylinder. Man evolved from other animals. All life originated in the sea and according to changing environments, then adapted. Anaximenes of Miletus Said to have been a student of Anaximander. Unlike Thales and Anaximander, he held that air is the primary substance from which all other substances are produced via natural forces. Condensation is an example of solid matter coming from air, via wind, then water, then stones (earth); fire comes from air via rarefaction. Air is the half-way point between earth and fire. The earth is a flat disc floating on air. Conclusion: The Ionian philosophers were driven by the wonder and joy of discovery; they believed man could know things as they are objectively. THE PYTHAGOREAN SOCIETY 2nd Half of the 6th century, Pythagorasan Ionianfounded a religious Pythagorean Society at Kroton in South Italy. A school with an ascetic and religious character stemming from the religious revival in the Ionian civilization toward its endthe attempt to provide genuine religious elements not provided in the Milesian cosmologies nor in the Olympian mythology. Movement to skepticism on the one hand and to the mystery religions on the other once the freshness and vigor of the early Ionian civilization (and the Milesian philosophies of this time) waned. Same happened during the fall of the Roman Empire. Common ground between Orphicism (worship of Dionysius) and Pythagoreanism: both organized into communities with initiations, etc; both posited the transmigration of soulsthat the soul is the important part of man, not the imprisoning body. Not essentially a political group, but involved in politics. Had political control in Kroton, but their lodges were burnt down and they were subject to persecution in 440-430 bc Society later revived in Tarentum, Italy in the fourth century. Ideas centered around purity and practices of purification and the transmigration of souls. The soul is aided, trained, and purified via silence, music, and mathematics. The soul is the seat of power in man, not the body (in contrast to the Homeric shades or shadow image of the departed). But there is no self-consciousness or self-identity bound up with the soul; self-identity doesnt transmigrate, in other words. Many of the philosophical and mathematical contributions were likely not by Pythagoras himself, but by someone in the Pythagorean school, such as Philolaus. Mathematico-metaphysical philosophy: Mathematical primacy in nature. All things are numerable. Musical intervals are also numerical; if musical harmony is dependent on number, so is harmony in the universe. Milesian cosmologies focused on the conflict of opposites in the universe; they Pythagoreans focused on the harmony of the universe via numerical relations. Number is fundamental. The final real things ARE numbers. Anaximander held that indeterminacy is fundamental; Pythagoras held that this indeterminacy is balanced by the Limit which gives it form, according to the harmony between the two expressed by number. According to Aristotle: The Pythagoreans held that the elements of number are the even and the odd; the latter are finite, the former infinite. (I.E. Even numbers are equated with the indefiniteness of Anaximander; odd numbers are the limit which provides harmony. 1 precedes from both, since it is both even and odd. The Pythagoreans regarded numbers spatially: 1 = point, 2 = line, 3 = plane, 4 = solid. All bodies consist of points in space which together constitute number. Evinced by the tetraktys figure, sacred to the Pythagoreans. 10 = the sum of 1, 2, 3, and 4. Objects are sums of points; numbers are sums of points; therefore, objects are numbers. The limited cosmos (odd numbers) is surrounded by the unlimited or boundless cosmos (air, even numbers.) The odd gnomons (figures used to geometrecise numbers) are always quadratic; the even gnomons are constantly changing rectangular shapes: 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 3 3 5 4 4 4. 6 1 3 5 1, 3, 5, odd, always square 2 2 4 6 2, 4, 6, even, ever- elongating rectangles Marriage = 3, the combination of the first masculine number, 1, and the first feminine number, 2. Justice = 4, etc. This type of numerical assignment seems arbitrary, thougha misapplied extrapolation of mathematics. The Pythagorean Theorem: their biggest contribution to mathematics. While it is also evinced in the Sumerian computations, the Pythagorean theorem transcended the mere arithmetical and geometrical fact and combined them in a deductive system. The earth was spherical and revolved, along with the planets and the sun, around the central fire or hearth of the Universe represented by the number 1. The world inhales air (the unlimited) from the unlimited mass outside it. (the influence of Anaximenes and Anaximander here.) The Pythagoreans emphasis on the soul and its tripartite nature and proper care influenced Plato, who was also strongly influenced by their mathematical speculations. HERACLITUS An Ephesian (modern day Turkey, village of Selcuk) who flourished approx. 504-501 bc. Disdain for the common man and for the famous of the past. Most men are bad. All things are in a state of flux. (not really his, though.) This is not the kernel of his philosophy, but it is a central idea. By saying that all things change, he is not saying that there is no reality, however. This is not the most important feature of his philosophy, though, since it is not novel (we saw it in other Ionian philosophers). The fundamental concept expressed in his Word: Unity in diversity, difference in unity. Anaximander considered the encroachements of opposites on each other as injustices and a disorder that mars the purity of the One. Heraclitus says that the conflict among opposites is essential to the One. The only One exists in the tension of opposites, and this tension is essential. We must know that war is common to all and strife is justice, and that all things come into being and pass away through strife. Numenius, Frag. 16 (Copleston I, 40). Men do know know how what is at variance agrees with itself. It is an attunement of opposite tensions, like that of the bow and the lyre. Frag. 51, ibid Copleston) Reality is The One, but The One is Identity in Difference. The primary substance for Heraclitus is fireand not just to be different from Thales and Anaxamenes. Fire depends on strife and tension. It feeds on and springs up from a multitude of objects, changing them into itself. Fire embodies the tension between the upward and downward paths elemental to change and the birth of the cosmos: Fire when condensed becomes water, which then becomes earth (downward path); and the earth liquefies, evaporates, etc (upward path). He refers almost everything to the evaporation from the sea. In an ever-changing world, enduring substance is explained thus: Fire takes from things by kindling, and turns back into things by extinguishment. All things are an exchange for Fire, and Fire for all things, even as wares for gold and gold for wares. Frag 90. Copleston 42) Matter changes, but the aggregate quantity of matter remains constant. The hidden attunement of the universe is the balance of the upward and downward paths. This leads to a certain relativism: To God all things are fair and good and right, but men hold some things wrong and some right. Frag. 102 This is the inevitable conclusion of a pantheistic philosophythat everything is justified. God is the universal reason, the universal law immanent in all things, binding all things into a unity and determining the constant change in the universe according to universal law. Reason and consciousness in manthe firey elementare the valuable element. When fire leaves the body, the water and earth remaining are worthless. Remaining dry is the wisest and best course of action. It may pleasure souls to become moist, but it is death to soul to become water. Human laws should be the embodiment of the Universal Law. This participation of man in the Reason of the universe paved the way for the universalist ideas of Stoicism. Some claim that Heraclitus believed in a periodic universal conflagration, where all becomes fire, as the Stoics believed, such that they inherited it from him. Copleston says there is no evidence for this. Heraclitus: Unity in Plurality. The desire to conceive of a unity in the obvious plurality comes from the fact that things ARE interdependent, and this interdependence IS the unity among the plurality. The only unity is the unity in diversity. Man is right in seeking unity, but it is wrong to assert unity to the detriment of plurality. Copleston, 44 A material universe which houses life MUST be a changing universe. But change implies both diversity and stability for there must be something which changes. And so there will be identity in diversity. Copleston 46 THESIS: Heraclitus of Ephesus conceived of a genuine philosophic notion of Unity in Diversity, though he did not adequately systematize it. ELEATIC SCHOOL Elea, in southern Italy. Reputed founder is Xenophanes, but no evidence that he was ever there. Reputed because he was a monist, per the Eleatic School. (Not a monotheist, though, which would have been too bizarre to be taken seriously at the time.) Parmenides: A citizen of Elea, was likely the real founder of the Eleatic School. Born around 500 bc; conversed with Socrates around 451-449 bc when 65 years old. Wrote his philosophy in poetic verse. Believed that Being, the One, is and that change or Becoming is an illusion. For if anything comes to be, it comes either out of being or non-being; if the former, then it already is; if the latter, then it is nothing, since only nothing can come from nothing. Plurality is then also an illusion. Rejects Pythagorean school because it embraces the concept of change. Introduces a duality of Truth vs. Appearance; or Reason vs. Sense. Makes explicit this distinction between Truth and Appearance, only implicit in other philosophies (Heraclitus, etc) This is NOT Idealism though (Plato, etc); because the One is not necessarily mere thought; Parmenides believes it to be material, and the illusion is that the One is plural and differentiated and changing. The Eleatic School is Monistic Materialism. Only reasonnot sensecan apprehend the material and unchanging One. Despite this, he is often called the father of Idealism. This is wrong. He may have influenced the Idealism of Plato, but his true lineage goes down through Empedocles and Democritus. Anything that CAN be MUST be; for if one were to imagine something that did not exist, it would be nothing, and could not be the object of speech and thought. To thing about nothing is the same as to not think. If you can thing about it and speak about it then it must be. Also, paradoxically, if something merely COULD be, then it could never actually come to be, for it would come out of nothing if it didnt exist already, and out of nothing comes nothing. The it which is is therefore necessarily COMPLETE and immovable and continuous. It must be spherical, finite in size but infinite temporallyspherical so that it looks the same from all perspectives. Asserts the indestructibility of matter, later adopted by Democritus and Empedocles. Democritus accounted for change by varying aggregations of material, indestructible atoms. Heraclitus asserted Becoming, but not exclusive of Being (for the One is Fire); but Permenides asserted Being exclusive of Becoming. Plato synthesizes the two: Parmenidess distinction between sense-objects and true objects via reason, the latter the only reality because the former are subject to the Heraclitean flux. The objects of true knowledge are stable and eternal, like the Being of Parmenidesbut not material like the Being of Parmenedes. Aristotle carries it further: Being in the sense of the ultimate immaterial reality (God) is changeless, subsistent thought. Material being, per Heraclitus, is subject to change, but according to concrete, stable forms (a la Plato) only forms of concrete material. The dilemma of Parmenides is solved by accounting for becoming via the concept of Potentia. Being does not arise out of nothing, nor out of being precisely as being actu, but rather out of Potentiaa different kind of something. THESIS: The Eleatics in general denied the reality of multiplicity and motion. There is one principle, Being, which is material and motionless. We sense motion and multiplicity, but through reason, we can determine that it is mere illusion. True being is discovered, therefore, by Thought. Unlike Heraclitus, who attempted to show the dialectic, mutual interrelation between plurality and unitychange and stability, the Eleatics believed in sheer unity and the Pythagoreans in sheer diversity/plurality(even though each concept ultimately presupposes the other). Yet Heraclitus philosophy was also unsatisfactory in that it could not sufficiently account for stability in the universe, and was bound up with materialistic monism. EMPEDOCLES OF AKRAGAS Akragas (Agrigentum) in Sicily. Approx 444-43. Amalgamated previous philosophies. Embraced Parmenides concept of material being without end, indestructible, etc. Nothing arises from nothing; something cannot arise out of nothing. But accounted for the experience of change, motion, and plurality via an atomist doctrine: Collections of atoms may come into and go out of being, but the atoms themselves do not. Empedocles invented the classification of matter into the four classes: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water. These cannot interchange. Objects come into being via the intermingling of the four elements, and cease to be via the separation of the elements. Empedocles mediates the philosophy of Parmenides and the facts of sensory experience. The processes of nature re: these four particles are attributed to TWO FORCES: Love (attraction, harmony); Hate (repulsion, discord). The former brings the four elements together; the latter separates them and destroys the unity of the particles, thus destroying the composite object. World-process is cyclic: Starts with Love (mingling of elements) then moves to Hate (dissociation of particles into their individual element groups). The world as we know it is in the period of the cycle just after the initial primary sphere and the stage of total separation of the elements. Hate is gradually penetrating the sphere. Air was the first to be separated off when the earth was formed, then fire, then earth. Water is squeezed out by centrifugal force from the earths rotation. Believed in transmigration of the soul in his Book of Purifications. ANAXAGORAS Born at Clazomenae in Asia Minor around 500 bc; came to Athens in the Persian Army, 480-79. First philosopher to settle into the city, which would later flourish in philosophy. Teacher of Pericles. Accepted, like Empedocles, the theory of Parmenides that Being neither comes into or passes out of existence, but is unchangeable. Atomist, like Empedocles, but unlike him, did not hold to the four elements. He believed that atoms are qualitatively the same as their larger object. Some objects are composed of many different types of atoms. In the beginning, the multiplicity of particles were intermingled homogenously. In everything, there is a portion of everything. Otherwise, he could not explain change. If grass becomes flesh, there must be some flesh particles in the grass. There is cold in warm, and warm in cold. Empedocles attributed motion to the two fundamental forces Love and Hate; Anaxagoras attributes it to the principle of Nous or Mind. Introduces the concept of mind but doesnt portray it as non-corporeal; does not introduce a kind of dualism in that regard. Nous is in all living thingsthe same in all. Matter is eternal, but Nous sets the vortex in motion and creates matter. All change is due to Nous. THE ATOMIST SCHOOL Founded by Leucippus of Miletus Member of the school of Parmenides, student of Zeno. Difficult to discern in this school between the works of Leucippus and Democritus; the latter came much later and was not a pre-Socratic. Atomism is the logical development of the philosophy of Empedocles, who reconciled Parmedian changelessness with the evident change of matter, via elemental particles and the two forces Love and Strife. The Philosophy of Empedocles formed a transitional stage to the explanation of all qualitative differences by a mechanical juxtaposition of material particles in different patterns. (Love and Strife would have to be replaced by a more sensible mechanics.) All these mechanics were developed by the Atomists. According to Leucippus and Democritus: Infinite number of atoms; imperceptible; differ in size and shape, but have no quality other than solidity and indivisibility. They move in the void. Unlike Empedocles, who said the void is corporeal, Leucippus says the void is non-being, which is just as real as being. Space is not a body, but is as real as a bodya different species of reality. (Later, Epicurus would add the force of weight to atoms such that they all move downwardinfluenced by Aristotles concept of weight). Democritus by contrast said there was no up or down or middle in the void. Collisions among atoms set up the vortex (Anaxagoras) and formed the world. Leucippus held that larger bodies would tend toward the center (against Anaxagoras, who held the opposite). Like atoms are brought together as in a sieve. This forms the four elements: Earth, Air, Fire and Water. Leucippus didnt use Empedocles two forces, or Anaxogoras Nous; didnt feel the need for any moving force. Atoms have eternal motion. Aristotle later criticized the lack of accounting for this motion. Leucippus sought no Unmoved Mover. The atoms of Leucippus and Democritus are the monads of the Pythagorean School, only with the properties of Parmenidean being, for each is the Parmenidean One. And as the elements arose from various arrangements and positions, they are like Pythagorean numbers. Leucippus rejects the Pythagorean spherical model for earth, saying it is more like that of Anaximenes (like Anaxagoras), a short spinning cylinder. The AtomistsLeucippus and Democritusgive an explanation of the world that is purely mechanical, and that is their contributionthe introduction of MECHANICAL MATERIALISM. PRE-SOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY All explorations as to the relationship and status of One and Many; Unity and Plurality; Continuity and Change. The quest for and anticipation of an underlying unity was not primarily driven by empirical induction; it was an intuition and a purely philosophical cosmology. Pre-socratic Philosophy centers on the world, not the self. The early Greek philosophers were primarily cosmologists. The stumbling blocks in this endeavor lead to a change of focus from Object, with the pre-Socratics, to Subject with the Socraticsfrom the Cosmos to Man himself.      PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 12  !RSTe  2 A   " { } %&78˱ˋuqiqdq`q`q`[ h]h h H*hUHh 5h h&Vh >*\]h&Vh(>*\] h&V\]h&Vh&V5CJOJQJaJh&Vh&VCJOJQJaJh&Vh&V6CJOJQJaJh&Vh&V56h&Vh&V56\]hUHh&V5\]h&V5\]hUH5\]hUHhUH5\]#!STUe  1 2 A p   " d { gd&Vgd&V$a$gd $a$gdUH{ | } w x   # 5 6 ? @ <=Yx  0^`0gd gd gd gdUH  nohij}~cd<=8 ]^gdcggdgB^gdgB^gd 0^`0gd gd m&Xhj{}~cd=-878:GN ƾƲͲ̈́̈́̈́͒͠zsoh hUHhcghUHhcg5\ ht"6] hcg6]hcghcghcg6] hcghcg ht"ht"h<+hgBhUHh 5hUHhgB5 h 5>*ht"ht"h 6] ht"]ht"ht"]h hh6 h] h6]+89:~  !!?$@$$$%%& && &''S(T(l(m(^gdUHgdcg0`0gdcg^gdcg U!V!W!\!!!!!!"""["q"v"##$$ $$&$$$%% && &?&C&&&&'''S(T(l(m(n(p(~((/x0w33445þ۴۰۰ۣۨ hUH6] hUH5\ hUHH*h( hUH>* h(>*hUHhUH5hUHhUHhcg5\ hk]hhk6hkhhhcg6hcghhh6 h6] h]hhcg]5m(**++,,n-o-l.m. / /112233#4$455J5i55 0^`0gdUH^gdUHgdUH^gdUH5555778 999;;;;<<=>>>HHIIIIIJJJJTKUKKKL MMMMNNO7OpOOOOOQQERGRVVVXXYYp[[``ccd eh)ih(hUH6\h(hUH5\ h(\ h(5\ hUH5\ hUH6] h(6] h(hUH hUH>*h(hUH\hUHh(E55X66677889999;;(===w>x>>>@@0B1BB^gdUHgdUH 0^`0gdUHBByCzC3D4DUEVEFFFF9H:HIIIIIIJJJUKVKLLLL^gdUHLLLMMOOPPyQzQGRHRRRSSTTVVWWXXYYY^gdUHgdUH^gdUHYYW[X[Q\R\\\]]__````````4b5bXcYcdd e ee^gdUHeeggjjzk{kmlnlymzmnnnnnnOoPoooqqqqqgdWi^gd&V^gdUH)iklIljlnllnnoooo>p^pqqqqqqqqqq5q6q8q9q;q=q>qhWimHnHuhWijhWiUhsJ\jhsJ\Uh( hUH>* hUH5\hUHqqqqq:q;qq^gd&V$a$gdWi 5 01h:pWi/ =!"#$% ^ 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH ^@^  Heading 1$<@&"5CJ KH OJPJQJ\^JaJ N"N  Heading 2dd@&[$\$5CJ$\aJ$DA`D Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List <O< EDialogue H^DD EStage Directions ^:: g Stage First ^B^"B  0 Normal (Web)dd[$\$222  sansdd[$\$4UA4  0 Hyperlink >*phV/QV  Heading 1 Char"5CJ KH OJPJQJ\^JaJ PR`bP  Body Text Indent 20^`0N/qN  Body Text Indent 2 CharCJaJHC@H  0Body Text Indenthx^hJ/J  0Body Text Indent CharCJaJFVF  0FollowedHyperlink >*B*ph4@4 Wi0Header  H$6/6 Wi0 Header CharCJaJ4 4 Wi0Footer  H$6/6 Wi0 Footer CharCJaJPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] >i +++++. 5)i>q9=?AG{ 8m(5BLYeq>q:;<>@BCDEFH $'.!8@0(  B S  ?U]29DKLPx ^gW\qv   !!v"~"""# #!$'$z$|$&' ''''))w++,,/-0-3-4->-?-B-C-F-G-P-Q-^-_-b-c---001111114+455555555]6a6l6u6779999;;X<]<>>+@4@AA>BEBBBCC?CACFFNKXKKK)L4LLLuNyNNNfPnPQQQQX"XXC^L^cceeghiiiiiiiiiiiii@UnknownG* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial7K@Cambria?= * Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math"1hffcY 5cY 5!x4hh2QHP ?dV2!xxThales Michael Epperson      Oh+'0x  4 @ LX`hpThales Michael Epperson Normal.dotm 3Microsoft Office Word@^в@4Ok@zϚk cY՜.+,0 hp|   5h Thales Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIKLMNOPQSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijlmnopqrtuvwxyz}~Root Entry Fp ԚkData J1TableR1WordDocument 7SummaryInformation(kDocumentSummaryInformation8sMsoDataStore: Ԛkp ԚkWLDEZDUB4Z==2: Ԛkp ԚkItem  PropertiesUCompObj y   F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q