ࡱ>  |q ?bjbjt+t+ AA|/-]@ @ @ @ T8888|Ld8, >J#4~#~##{P$Zg+gg˾@ @ ~##i ˾˾˾g @ ~##88@ @ @ @ g˾˾ut #\ m88 B^CHAPTER 14 COST ALLOCATION, CUSTOMER-PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS, AND SALES-VARIANCE ANALYSIS 14-1 Disagree. Cost accounting data plays a key role in many management planning and control decisions. The division president will be able to make better operating and strategy decisions by being involved in key decisions about cost pools and cost allocation bases. Such an understanding, for example, can help the division president evaluate the profitability of different customers. 14-2 The salary of a plant security guard would be a direct cost when the cost object is the security department of the plant. It would be an indirect cost when the cost object is a product. 14-3 Exhibit 14-1 outlines four purposes for allocating costs: 1. To provide information for economic decisions. 2. To motivate managers and employees. 3. To justify costs or compute reimbursement. 4. To measure income and assets for reporting to external parties. 14-4 Exhibit 14-2 lists four criteria used to guide cost allocation decisions: 1. Cause and effect. 2. Benefits received. 3. Fairness or equity. Ability to bear. The cause-and-effect criterion and the benefits-received criterion are the dominant criteria when the purpose of the allocation is related to the economic decision purpose or the motivation purpose. 14-5 Using the levels approach introduced in Chapter 7, the salesvolume variance is a Level 2 variance. By sequencing through Level 3 (salesmix and salesquantity variances) and then Level 4 (marketsize and marketshare variances), managers can gain insight into the causes of a specific sales-volume variance caused by changes in the mix and quantity of the products sold as well as changes in market size and market share. 146 The total salesmix variance arises from differences in the budgeted contribution margin of the actual and budgeted sales mix. The composite unit concept enables the effect of individual product changes to be summarized in a single intuitive number by using weights based on the mix of individual units in the actual and budgeted mix of products sold. 147 A favorable salesquantity variance arises because the actual units of all products sold exceed the budgeted units of all products sold. 148 The salesquantity variance can be decomposed into (a) a marketsize variance (because the actual total market size in units is different from the budgeted market size in units), and (b) a market share variance (because the actual market share of a company is different from the budgeted market share of a company). Both variances use the budgeted average contribution margin per unit. 149 Some companies who believe that reliable information on total market size is not available, choose not to compute marketsize and marketshare variances. 1410 Customer profitability analysis highlights to managers how individual customers differentially contribute to total profitability. It helps managers to see whether customers who contribute sizably to total profitability are receiving a comparable level of attention from the organization. 1411 Companies that separately record (a) the list price and (b) the discount have sufficient information to subsequently examine the level of discounting by each individual customer and by each individual salesperson. 1412 No. A customerprofitability profile highlights differences in current period's profitability across customers. Dropping customers should be the last resort. An unprofitable customer in one period may be highly profitable in subsequent future periods. Moreover, costs assigned to individual customers need not be purely variable with respect to shortrun elimination of sales to those customers. Thus, when customers are dropped, costs assigned to those customers may not disappear in the short run. 1413 Five categories in a customer cost hierarchy are identified in the chapter. The examples given relate to the Spring Distributor Company used in the chapter: Customer outputunitlevel costs costs of activities to sell each unit (case) to a customer. An example is producthandling costs of each case sold. Customer batchlevel costs costs of activities that are related to a group of units (cases) sold to a customer. Examples are costs incurred to process orders or to make deliveries. Customersustaining costs costs of activities to support individual customers, regardless of the number of units or batches of product delivered to the customer. Examples are costs of visits to customers or costs of displays at customer sites. Distributionchannel costs costs of activities related to a particular distribution channel rather than to each unit of product, each batch of product, or specific customers. An example is the salary of the manager of Spring's retail distribution channel. Corporatesustaining costs costs of activities that cannot be traced to individual customers or distribution channels. Examples are top management and general administration costs. 1414 A process where the inputs are nonsubstitutable leaves workers no discretion as to the inputs (such as, types of materials or labor) to use. A process where the inputs are substitutable means there is discretion about the exact number and type of inputs to produce output. 1415 The direct materials efficiency variance is a Level 3 variance. Further insight into this variance can be gained by moving to a Level 4 analysis where the effect of mix and yield changes are quantified. The mix variance captures the effect of a change in the relative percentage use of each input relative to that budgeted. The yield variance captures the effect of a change in the total number of inputs required to obtain a given output relative to that budgeted. 14-16 (15-20 min.) Cost allocation in hospitals, alternative allocation criteria. 1. Direct costs = $2.40 Indirect costs = $11.52 $2.40 = $9.12 Overhead rate =  EQ \f($9.12,$2.40) = 380% 2. The answers here are less than clear-cut in some cases. Overhead Cost ItemAllocation CriteriaProcessing of paperwork for purchase Supplies room management fee Operating-room and patient-room handling costs Administrative hospital costs University teaching-related costs Malpractice insurance costs Cost of treating uninsured patients Profit componentCause and effect Benefits received Cause and effect Benefits received Ability to bear Ability to bear or benefits received Ability to bear None. This is not a cost. 3. Assuming that Meltzer's insurance company is responsible for paying the $4,800 bill, Meltzer probably can only express outrage at the amount of the bill. The point of this question is to note that even if Meltzer objects strongly to one or more overhead items, it is his insurance company that likely has the greater incentive to challenge the bill. Individual patients have very little power in the medical arena. In contrast, insurance companies have considerable power and may decide that certain costs are not reimbursablefor example, the costs of treating uninsured patients. 14-17 (15 min.) Cost allocation and motivation. Because corporate policy encourages line managers to seek legal counsel on pertinent issues from the Legal Department, any step in the direction of reducing costs of legal department services would be consistent with the corporate policy. Currently a user department is charged a standard fee of $400 per hour based on actual usage. It is possible that some managers may not be motivated to seek the legal counsel they need due to the high-allocated cost of the service. It is also possible that those managers whose departments are currently experiencing budgetary cost overruns may be disinclined to make use of the service; it would save them from the Legal Departments cost allocation. However, it could potentially result in much costlier penalties for Environ later if the corporation inadvertently engaged in some activities that violated one or more laws. 14-17 (Contd.) It is quite likely that the line managers would seek legal counsel, whenever there were any pertinent legal issues, if the service were free. Making the service of the Legal Department free, however, might induce some managers to make excessive use of the service. To avoid any potential abuse, Environ may want to adjust the rate downward considerably, perhaps at a level lower than what it would cost if outside legal services were sought, but not eliminate it altogether. As long as the managers know that their respective departments would be charged for using the service, they would be disinclined to make use of it unnecessarily. However, they would be motivated to use it when necessary because it would be considered a good value if the standard hourly rate was low enough. 14-18 (30 min.) Cost allocation to divisions. 1. HotelRestaurant CasinoRembrandtRevenue$16,425,000$5,256,000$12,340,000$34,021,000Direct costs 9,819,260 3,749,172 4,248,768 17,817,200Segment margin$ 6,605,740$1,506,828$ 8,091,232 16,203,800Indirect costs 14,550,000Income before taxes$ 1,653,800Segment margin % 40.22% 28.67% 65.57%2.HotelRestaurant CasinoRembrandtDirect costs$9(819(260$3(749(172$4(248(768$17(817(200Direct cost % 55.11% 21.04% 23.85% 100.00%Square footage 80,000 16,000 64,000 160,000Square footage % 50.00% 10.00% 40.00% 100.00%# of Employees 200 50 250 500# of Employees % 40.00% 10.00% 50.00% 100.00% A: Cost allocation based on direct costs:HotelRestaurantCasinoRembrandtRevenue$16,425,000$ 5,256,000$12,340,000$34,021,000Direct costs 9,819,260 3,749,172 4,248,768 17,817,200Segment margin 6,605,740 1,506,828 8,091,232 16,203,800Allocated indirect costs 8,018,505 3,061,320 3,470,175 14,550,000Segment pre-tax income$( 1,412,765)$ (1,554,492)$ 4,621,057$ 1,653,800 Segment pre-tax income % -8.60% -29.58% 37.45%  14-18 (Contd.) B: Cost allocation based on floor space: HotelRestaurant CasinoRembrandtAllocated indirect costs$7,275,000$1,455,000$5,820,000$14,550,000Segment pre-tax income$ (669,260)$ 51,828$2,271,232$ 1,653,800Segment pre-tax income % -4.07% 0.99% 18.41% C: Cost allocation based on # of employees HotelRestaurant Casino RembrandtAllocated indirect costs$5,820,000$1,455,000$7,275,000$14,550,000Segment pre-tax income$ 785,740$ 51,828$ 816,232$ 1,653,800Segment pre-tax income % 4.78% 0.99% 6.61%  The segment pre-tax income percentages show the dramatic effect of choice of the cost allocation base on reported numbers: Denominator HotelRestaurantCasinoDirect costs-8.60% -29.58% 37.45%Floor space-4.07 0.99 18.41# of employees 4.78 0.99 6.61 The decision context should guide a. whether costs should be allocated, and b. the preferred cost allocation base. Decisions about, say, performance measurement may be made on a combination of financial and nonfinancial measures. It may well be that Rembrandt may prefer to exclude allocated costs from the financial measures to reduce areas of dispute. Where cost allocation is required, the cause-and-effect and benefits-received criteria are recommended in Chapter 14. The $14,550,000 is a fixed overhead cost. This means that on a short-run basis, the cause-and-effect criterion is not appropriate but Rembrandt could attempt to identify the cost drivers for these costs in the long run when these costs are likely to be more variable. Rembrandt should look at how the $14,550,000 cost benefits the three divisions. This will help guide the choice of an allocation base in the short run. 4. The analysis in requirement 2 should not guide the decision on whether to shut down any of the divisions. The overhead costs are fixed costs in the short run. It is not clear how these costs would be affected in the long run if Rembrandt shut down one of the divisions. Also, each division is not independent of the other two. A decision to shut down, say, the restaurant likely would negatively affect the attendance at the casino and possibly the hotel. Rembrandt should examine the future revenue and future cost implications of different resource investments in the three divisions. This is a future-oriented exercise, whereas the analysis in requirement 2 is an analysis of past costs. 14-19 (25 min.) Cost allocation to divisions. 1. Pulp Paper Fibers Segment margin $3,200,000 $7,100,000 $9,700,000 Percentages 16.0% 35.5% 48.5% Allocation: ($9,000,000 16.0%, 35.5%, 48.5%) $1,440,000 $3,195,000 $4,365,000 Percentages for new bases of allocation Pulp Paper Fibers Number of employees 300 250 450 Percentages 30% 25% 45% Floor space (square feet) 30,000 24,000 66,000 Percentages 25% 20% 55% Divisional administrative $1,200,000 $1,800,000 $3,000,000 Percentages 20% 30% 50% Allocation of indirect costs Pulp Paper Fibers Human resource management ($1,800,000 30%, 25%, 45%) $ 540,000 $ 450,000 $ 810,000 Facility ($2,700,000 25%, 20%, 55%) 675,000 540,000 1,485,000 Corporate administration ($4,500,000 20%, 30%, 50%) 900,000 1,350,000 2,250,000 Total $2,115,000 $2,340,000 $4,545,000 3. The new approach is preferable because it is based on cause-and-effect relationships between costs and their respective cost drivers in the long run. Human resource management costs are allocated using the number of employees in each division because the costs for recruitment, training, etc., are mostly related to the number of employees in each division. Facility costs are mostly incurred on the basis of space occupied by each division. Corporate administration costs are allocated on the basis of divisional administrative costs because these costs are incurred to provide support to divisional administrations. 14-20 (20(30 min.) Customer profitability, service company. 1. (in thousands)  Customer Revenues Customer Costs Customer Operating IncomeAvery Group Duran Systems Retail Systems Wizard Partners Santa Clara College Grainger Services Software Partners Problem Solvers Business Systems Okie Enterprises$ 260 180 163 322 235 80 174 76 137 373$182 184 178 225 308 74 100 108 110 231$ 78 (4) (15) 97 (73) 6 74 (32) 27 142Solution Exhibits 14-20A and 14-20B present the summary results. The two most profitable customers provide 80% of total operating income. 2. The options Instant Service should consider include: a. Increase the attention paid to Okie Enterprises and Wizard Partners. These are "key customers," and every effort has to be made to ensure they retain IS. IS may well want to suggest a minor price reduction to signal how important it is in their view to provide a cost-effective service to these customers. b. Seek ways of reducing the costs or increasing the revenues of the problem accountsSanta Clara College and Problem Solvers. For example, are the copying machines at Santa Clara outdated and in need of repair? If yes, an increased charge may be appropriate. Can IS provide better on-site guidelines to users about ways to reduce breakdowns? c. As a last resort, IS may want to consider dropping particular accounts. For example, if Santa Clara College will not agree to a fee increase but has machines continually breaking down, IS may well decide that it is time not to bid on any more work for this customer. 3. Major problems in accurately estimating the operating costs of each customer are: a. Basic underlying records may not be accurate. For example, some technicians include travel time, break time, etc., in their time records to create an appearance of high work effort. b. Not all costs for individual repair people are easily assignable to individual customers. For example, how is the cost of a trip to pick up parts for three customers assigned among individual customers? c. Many costs of IS are not related to specific customers. For example, advertising by IS is aimed at a general market rather than being targeted to a specific potential customer. 14-20 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-20A Panel A: Customers Ranked on Customer-Level Operating Income  Customer Operating Income (1) Customer Revenue (2)Customer Operating Income Divided By Revenue (3) = (1) (2) Cumulative Customer Operating Income (4)Operating Income as a % of Total Operating Income (5) = (4) ( $300Okie Ent.$142$ 373 38%$142 47%Wizard P. 97322 30 239 80Avery Group 78260 30 317106Software P. 74174 43 391130Business S. 27137 20 418139Grainger S. 6808 424141Duran S. (4)180(2) 420140Retail S. (15)163(9) 405135Problem S. (32)76 (42) 373124Santa Clara  (73) 235 (31) 300100 $300$2,000 14-20 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-20B Bar Chart of Customer Operating Income  14-21 (20(25 min.) Customer profitability, distribution. 1. The activity-based costing for each customer is: Charleston PharmacyChapel Hill Pharmacy 1. Order processing, $40 12; $40 10 $ 480 $ 400 2. Line-item ordering, $3 (12 10;10 18) 360 540 3. Store deliveries, $50 6; $50 10 300 500 4. Carton deliveries, $1 (6 24; 10 20) 144 200 5. Shelf-stocking, $16 (6 0; 10 0.5) 0 80 Operating costs $1,284 $1,720 The operating income of each customer is: Charleston PharmacyChapel Hill PharmacyRevenues, $2,400 6; $1,800 10 $14,400 $18,000 Cost of goods sold, $2,100 6; $1,650 10 12,600 16,500 Gross margin 1,800 1,500 Operating costs 1,284 1,720 Operating income $ 516 $ (220) Chapel Hill Pharmacy has a lower gross margin percentage than Charleston (8.33% vs. 12.50%) and consumes more resources to obtain this lower margin. Ways Figure Four could use this information include: a. Pay increased attention to the top 20% of the customers. This could entail asking them for ways to improve service. Alternatively, you may want to highlight to your own personnel the importance of these customers; e.g., it could entail stressing to delivery people the importance of never missing delivery dates for these customers. b. Work out ways internally at Figure Four to reduce the rate per cost driver; e.g., reduce the cost per order by having better order placement linkages with customers. This cost reduction by Figure Four will improve the profitability of all customers. c. Work with customers so that their behavior reduces the total "system-wide" costs. At a minimum, this approach could entail having customers make fewer orders and fewer line items. This latter point is controversial with students; the rationale is that a reduction in the number of line items (diversity of products) carried by Ma and Pa stores may reduce the diversity of products Figure Four carries. 14-21 (Cont'd.) There are several options here: Simple verbal persuasion by showing customers cost drivers at Figure Four. Explicitly pricing out activities like cartons delivered and shelf-stocking so that customers pay for the costs they cause. Restricting options available to certain customers, e.g., customers with low revenues could be restricted to one free delivery per week. An even more extreme example is working with customers so that deliveries are easier to make and shelf-stocking can be done faster. d. Offer salespeople bonuses based on the operating income of each customer rather than the gross margin of each customer. Some students will argue that the bottom 40% of the customers should be dropped. This action should be only a last resort after all other avenues have been explored. Moreover, an unprofitable customer today may well be a profitable customer tomorrow, and it is myopic to focus on only a 1-month customer-profitability analysis to classify a customer as unprofitable. 14-22 (3040 min.) Variance analysis, multiple products. 1.  EQ \A(Sales-volume,variance)  =  EMBED Equation.3  (  EMBED Equation.3  (  EMBED Equation.3  Lower-tier tickets = (3,300 4,000) ( $20 = $14,000 U Upper-tier tickets = (7,700 6,000) ( $ 5 = 8,500 F All tickets $ 5,500 U 2.  EMBED Equation.3  =  EMBED Equation.3  =  EMBED Equation.3  =  EMBED Equation.3  = $11 per unit (seat sold) 14-22 (Cont'd.) Sales-mix percentages: BudgetedActual Lower-tier EMBED Equation.3 = 0.40 EMBED Equation.3 = 0.30 Upper-tier EMBED Equation.3 = 0.60 EMBED Equation.3 = 0.70 Solution Exhibit 14-22 presents the sales-volume, sales-quantity, and sales-mix variances for lower-tier tickets, upper-tier tickets, and in total for Detroit Penguins in 2004. The sales-quantity variances can also be computed as:  EQ \A(Sales-quantity,variance)  =  EMBED Equation.3  (  EMBED Equation.3 (  EMBED Equation.3  The sales-quantity variances are: Lower-tier tickets = (11,000 10,000) 0.40 $20 = $8,000 F Upper-tier tickets = (11,000 10,000) 0.60 $ 5 = 3,000 F All tickets $11,000 F The sales-mix variance can also be computed as:  EQ \A(Sales-mix,variance) =  EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3  The sales-mix variances are: Lower-tier tickets = 11,000 (0.30 0.40) $20 = $22,000 U Upper-tier tickets = 11,000 (0.70 0.60) $ 5 = 5,500 F All tickets $16,500 U 3. The Detroit Penguins increased average attendance by 10% per game. However, there was a sizable shift from lower-tier seats (budgeted contribution margin of $20 per seat) to the upper-tier seats (budgeted contribution margin of $5 per seat). The net result: the actual contribution margin was $5,500 below the budgeted contribution margin. 14-22 (Cont'd.) Solution Exhibit 14-22 Columnar Presentation of Sales-Volume, Sales-Quantity and Sales-Mix Variances for Detroit Penguins Flexible Budget: Actual Units of All Products Sold Actual Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Unit (1) Actual Units of All Products Sold Budgeted Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Unit (2)Static Budget: Budgeted Units of All Products Sold Budgeted Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Unit (3)Panel A: Lower-tier (11,000 0.30a) $20 3,300 $20 (11,000 0.40b) $20 4,400 $20 (10,000 0.40b) $20 4,000 $20 $66,000 $88,000 $80,000 $22,000U $8,000 F Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance $14,000 U Sales-volume variancePanel B: Upper-tier (11,000 0.70c) $5 7,700 $5 (11,000 0.60d) $5 6,600 $5 (10,000 0.60d) $5 6,000 $5 $38,500 $33,000 $30,000 $5,500 F $3,000 F Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance $8,500 F Sales-volume variancePanel C: All Tickets (Sum of Lower-tier and Upper-tier tickets) $104,500e $121,000f $110,000g $16,500 U $11,000 F Total sales-mix variance Total sales-quantity variance $5,500 U Total sales-volume varianceF = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income. Actual Sales Mix: aLower-tier = 3,300 11,000 = 30% cUpper-tier = 7,700 11,000 = 70% e$66,000 + 38,500 = $104,500 Budgeted Sales Mix: bLower-tier = 4,000 10,000 = 40% dUpper-tier = 6,000 10,000 = 60% f $88,000 + $33,000 = $121,000 g $80,000 + $30,000 = $110,000 14-22 (Cont'd.) 14-22 Excel Application Revenues, Sales Variances, and Customer Profitability AnalysisDetroit PenguinsOriginal DataLower-TierUpper-Tier Tickets TicketsSelling price $35  $14 Downtown arena fee 10 6Reservation network fee 5 3Contribution margin per ticket $20  $ 5 BudgetedActualSeats SoldSeats SoldLower-Tier 4,000 3,300Upper-Tier 6,000 7,700Total10,00011,000Problem 1Sales Volume Variance calculationsLower-tier tickets $(14,000)UUpper-tier tickets $ 8,500 FAll tickets $ (5,500)UProblem 2 Sales - mix percentagesBudgetedActualLower-tier0.40.3Upper-tier0.60.7Sales-quantity variance calculationsLower-tier tickets $ 8,000 FUpper-tier tickets $ 3,000 FAll tickets $11,000 FSales-mix variance calculationsLower-tier tickets $(22,000)UUpper-tier tickets $ 5,500 FAll tickets $(16,500)U (30 min.) Variance analysis, working backward. 1, and 2. Solution Exhibit 14-23 presents the sales-volume, sales-quantity, and sales-mix variances for the Plain and Chic wine glasses and in total for Jinwa Corporation in June 2003. The steps to fill in the numbers in Solution Exhibit 14-23 follow: Step 1: Consider the static budget column (Column 3): Static budget total contribution margin $5,600 Budgeted units of all glasses to be sold 2,000 Budgeted contribution margin per unit of Plain $2 Budgeted contribution margin per unit of Chic $6 Suppose that the budgeted sales-mix percentage of Plain is y. Then the budgeted sales-mix percentage of Chic is (1 y). Hence, (2,000y ( $2) + (2,000 ( (1 y) ( $6) = $5,600 4000y + 12,000 12,000y = 5,600 8,000y = 6,400 y = 0.8 or 80% 1 y = 1 0.8 = 0.2 or 20% Jinwa's budgeted sales mix is 80% of Plain and 20% of Chic. We can then fill in all the numbers in Column 3. Step 2: Next, consider Column 2 of Solution Exhibit 14-23. The total of Column 2 in Panel C is $4,200 (the static budget total contribution margin of $5,600the total sales-quantity variance of $1,400 U which was given in the problem). We need to find the actual units sold of all glasses, which we denote by q. From Column 2, we know that (q ( 0.8 ( $2) + (q ( 0.2 ( $6) = $4,200 $1.6q + $1.2q = $4,200 $2.8q = $4,200 q = 1,500 units Hence, the total quantity of all glasses sold is 1,500 units. This computation allows us to fill in all the numbers in Column 2. Step 3: Next, consider Column 1 of Solution Exhibit 14-23. We know actual units sold of all glasses (1,500 units), the actual sales-mix percentage (given in the problem information as Plain, 60%; Chic, 40%), and the budgeted unit contribution margin of each product (Plain, $2; Chic, $6). We can therefore determine all the numbers in Column 1. 14-23 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-23 displays the following sales-quantity, sales-mix, and sales-volume variances: Sales-Volume Variance Plain $1,400 U Chic 1,200 F All Glasses $ 200 U Sales-Mix Variances Sales-Quantity Variances Plain $ 600 U Plain $ 800 U Chic 1,800 F Chic 600 U All Glasses $1,200 F All Glasses $1,400 U 3. Jinwa Corporation shows an unfavorable sales-quantity variance because it sold fewer wine glasses in total than was budgeted. This unfavorable sales-quantity variance is partially offset by a favorable sales-mix variance because the actual mix of wine glasses sold has shifted in favor of the higher contribution margin Chic wine glasses. The problem illustrates how failure to achieve the budgeted market penetration can have negative effects on operating income. 14-23 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-23 Columnar Presentation of Sales-Volume, Sales-Quantity and Sales-Mix Variances for Jinwa Corporation Flexible Budget: Actual Units Sold of All Glasses ( Actual Sales Mix ( Budgeted Contribution Margin per Unit Actual Units Sold of All Glasses ( Budgeted Sales Mix ( Budgeted Contribution Margin per UnitStatic Budget: Budgeted Units Sold of All Glasses ( Budgeted Sales Mix ( Budgeted Contribution Margin per UnitPanel A: Plain(1,500 ( 0.6) ( $2 900 ( $2(1,500 ( 0.8) ( $2 1,200 ( $2(2,000 ( 0.8) ( $2 1,600 ( $2 $1,800 $2,400 $3,200 $600 U $800 U Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance $1,400 U Sales-volume variance Panel B: Chic (1,500 ( 0.4) ( $6 600 ( $6 (1,500 ( 0.2) ( $6 300 ( $6 (2,000 ( 0.2) ( $6 400 ( $6 $3,600 $1,800 $2,400 $1,800 F $600 U Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance $1,200 F Sales-volume variance Panel C: All Glasses  $5,400 $4,200 $5,600 $1,200 F $1,400 U Total sales-mix variance Total sales-quantity variance $200 U Total sales-volume varianceF = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income. 14-24 (60 min.) Variance analysis, multiple products. 1. Budget for 2003 Variable Contrib. Selling Cost Margin Units Sales Contribution Price per Unit per Unit Sold Mix Margin (1) (2) (3) = (1) (2) (4) (5) (6) = (3) (4) Kola $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 400,000 16% $ 800,000 Limor 4.00 2.80 1.20 600,000 24 720,000 Orlem 7.00 4.50 2.50 1,500,000 60 3,750,000 Total 2,500,000 100% $5,270,000 Actual for 2003 Variable Contrib. Selling Cost Margin Units Sales Contribution Price per Unit per Unit Sold Mix Margin (1) (2) (3) = (1) (2) (4) (5) (6) = (3) (4) Kola $6.20 $4.50 $1.70 480,000 16% $ 816,000 Limor 4.25 2.75 1.50 900,000 30 1,350,000 Orlem 6.80 4.60 2.20 1,620,000 54 3,564,000 Total 3,000,000 100% $5,730,000 Solution Exhibit 14-24 presents the sales-volume, sales-quantity, and sales-mix variances for each product and in total for 2003.  Actual sales Budgeted sales Budgeted = quantity quantity contrib. margin in units in units per unit Kola = ( 480,000 400,000) $2.00 = $160,000 F Limor = ( 900,000 600,000) $1.20 = 360,000 F Orlem = (1,620,000 1,500,000) $2.50 = 300,000 F Total $820,000 F   Actual units Budgeted units Budgeted Budgeted = of all products of all products sales-mix contrib. margin sold sold percentage per unit Kola = (3,000,000 2,500,000) 0.16 $2.00 = $ 160,000 F Limor = (3,000,000 2,500,000) 0.24 $1.20 = 144,000 F Orlem = (3,000,000 2,500,000) 0.60 $2.50 = 750,000 F Total $1,054,000 F 14-24 (Contd.)   Actual units Actual Budgeted Budgeted = of all products sales-mix sales-mix contrib. margin sold percentage percentage per unit Kola = 3,000,000 (0.16 0.16) $2.00 = $ 0 Limor = 3,000,000 (0.30 0.24) $1.20 = 216,000 F Orlem = 3,000,000 (0.54 0.60) $2.50 = 450,000 U Total $234,000 U 2. The breakdown of the favorable sales-volume variance of $820,000 shows that the biggest contributor is the 500,000 unit increase in sales resulting in a favorable sales-quantity variance of $1,054,000. There is a partially offsetting unfavorable sales-mix variance of $234,000 in contribution margin. SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-24 Sales-Mix and Sales-Quantity Variance Analysis of Soda King for 2003  Flexible Budget: Static Budget: Actual Units of Actual Units of Budgeted Units of All Products Sold All Products Sold All Products Sold ( Actual Sales Mix ( Budgeted Sales Mix ( Budgeted Sales Mix ( Budgeted Contribution ( Budgeted Contribution ( Budgeted Contribution Margin Per Unit Margin Per Unit Margin Per Unit Kola 3,000,000 ( 0.16 ( $2 = $ 960,000 3,000,000 ( 0.16 ( $2 = $ 960,000 2,500,000 ( 0.16 ( $2 = $ 800,000 Limor 3,000,000 ( 0.30 ( $1.20 = 1,080,000 3,000,000 ( 0.24 ( $1.20 = 864,000 2,500,000 ( 0.24 ( $1.20 = 720,000 Orlem 3,000,000 ( 0.54 ( $2.50 = 4,050,000 3,000,000 ( 0.60 ( $2.50 = 4,500,000 2,500,000 ( 0.60 ( $2.50 = 3,750,000 $6,090,000 $6,324,000 $5,270,000   $234,000 U $1,054,000 F Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance   $820,000 F Sales-volume variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U= unfavorable effect on operating income 14-25 (20 min.) Market-share and market-size variances (continuation of 14-24). Actual Budgeted Western region 24 million 25 million Soda King 3 million 2.5 million Market share 12.5% 10% Average budgeted contribution margin per unit = $2.108 ($5,270,000 2,500,000) Solution Exhibit 14-25 presents the sales-quantity variance, market-size variance, and market-share variance for 2003.  Actual Actual Budgeted Budgeted contribution Market-share = market size market market margin per composite variance in units share share unit for budgeted mix = 24,000,000 (0.125 0.10) $2.108 = 24,000,000 .025 $2.108 = $1,264,800 F  Actual Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted contribution Market-size = market size market size market margin per composite variance in units in units share unit for budgeted mix = (24,000,000 25,000,000) 0.10 $2.108 = 1,000,000 0.10 $2.108 = 210,800 U The market share variance is favorable because the actual 12.5% market share was higher than the budgeted 10% market share. The market size variance is unfavorable because the market size decreased 4% [(25,000,000 24,000,000) 25,000,000]. While the overall total market size declined (from 25 million to 24 million), the increase in market share meant a favorable sales-quantity variance. Sales-Quantity Variance  $1,054,000 F  Market-share variance Market-size variance $1,264,800 F $210,800 U 14-25 (Contd.) SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-25 Market-Share and Market-Size Variance Analysis of Soda King for 2003 Static Budget: Actual Market Size Actual Market Size Budgeted Market Size ( Actual Market Share ( Budgeted Market Share ( Budgeted Market Share ( Budgeted Average ( Budgeted Average ( Budgeted Average Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit 24,000,000 ( 0.125a ( $2.108b 24,000,000 ( 0.10c ( $2.108 b 25,000,000 ( 0.10c ( $2.108b  $6,324,000 $5,059,200 $5,270,000  $1,264,800 F $210,800 U  Market-share variance Market-size variance  $1,054,000 F Sales-quantity variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income aActual market share: 3,000,000 units 24,000,000 units = 0.125, or 12.5% bBudgeted average contribution margin per unit $5,270,000 2,500,000 units = $2.108 per unit cBudgeted market share: 2,500,000 units 25,000,000 units = 0.10, or 10% 14-26 (40 min.) Allocation of central corporate costs to divisions. 1. The purposes for allocating central corporate costs to each division include: a. To provide information for economic decisions. Allocations can signal to division managers that decisions to expand (contract) activities will likely require increases (decreases) in corporate costs that should be considered in the initial decision about expansion (contraction). When top management is allocating resources to divisions, analysis of relative division profitability should consider differential use of corporate services by divisions. Some allocation schemes can encourage the use of central services that would otherwise be underutilized. A common rationale related to this purpose is "to remind profit center managers that central corporate costs exist and that division earnings must be adequate to cover some share of those costs." b. Motivation. Creates an incentive for division managers to control costs; for example, by reducing the number of employees at a division, a manager will save direct labor costs as well as central personnel and payroll costs allocated on the basis of number of employees. Allocation also creates incentives for division managers to monitor the effectiveness and efficiency with which central corporate costs are spent. Cost justification or reimbursement. Some lines of business of Richfield Oil may be regulated with cost data used in determining "fair prices"; allocations of central corporate costs will result in higher prices being set by a regulator. d. Income measurement for external parties. Richfield Oil may include allocations of central corporate costs in its external line-of-business reporting. Instructors may wish to discuss the "Surveys of Company Practice" evidence from the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom in Chapter 14 (p. 488). 2. Total costs in single pool = $3,000 Allocation base = $30,000 revenue Allocation rate = $3,000 $30,000 = $0.10 per $1 of revenue See Solution Exhibit 14-26 for additional answers. 14-26 (Contd.) 3. See Solution Exhibit 14-26 for answer. Solution Exhibit 14-26 (in millions) Oil & Gas UpstreamOil & Gas DownstreamChemical ProductsCopper Mining TotalRevenues Operating costs Allocated costs, $0.10 per $1 revenue Division income $7,000 3,000 700 $3,300$16,000 15,000 1,600 $ (600)$4,000 3,800 400 $ (200)$3,000 3,200 300 $ (500)$30,000 25,000 3,000 $ 2,000 Allocation BaseOil & Gas UpstreamOil & Gas DownstreamChemical ProductsCopper Mining1. Allocated on basis of identifiable assets Total costs = $2,000 2. Allocated on basis of revenues Total costs = $600 3. Allocated on basis of operating income (if positive) Total costs = $208 4. Allocated on basis of number of employees Total costs = $192  14/25 $1,120 7/30 $140 40/52 $160 9/30 $ 57.6 6/25 $480 16/30 $320 10/52 $ 40 12/30 $ 76.8 3/25 $240 4/30 $ 80 2/52 $ 8 6/30 $ 38.4 2/25 $160 3/30 $ 60 -- $ 0 3/30 $ 19.2 Oil & Gas UpstreamOil & Gas DownstreamChemical ProductsCopper Mining TotalRevenues Operating costs Cost Pool 1 Allocation Cost Pool 2 Allocation Cost Pool 3 Allocation Cost Pool 4 Allocation Division income $7,000 3,000 1,120 140 160 57.6 $2,522.4$16,000 15,000 480 320 40 76.8 $ 83.2$4,000 3,800 240 80 8 38.4 $ (166.4)$3,000 3,200 160 60 0 19.2 $ (439.2)$30,000 25,000 2,000 600 208 192 $ 2,000 14-26 (Contd) 4. Strengths of Rhodes' proposal relative to existing single-cost pool method: a. Better able to capture cause-and-effect relationships. Interest on debt is more likely caused by the financing of assets than by revenues. Personnel and payroll costs are more likely caused by the number of employees than by revenues. b. Relatively simple. No extra information need be collected beyond that already available. (Some students will list the extra costs of Rhodes' proposal as a weakness. However, for a company with $30 billion in revenues, those extra costs are minimal.) Weaknesses of Rhodes' proposal relative to existing single-cost pool method: a. May promote dysfunctional decision making. May encourage division managers to lease or rent assets rather than to purchase assets, even where it is economical for Richfield Oil to purchase them. This off-balance sheet financing will reduce the "identifiable assets" of the division and thus will reduce the interest on debt costs allocated to the division. (Richfield Oil could counteract this problem by incorporating leased and rented assets in the "identifiable assets" base.) Note: Some students criticized Rhodes' proposal, even though agreeing that it is preferable to the existing single-cost pool method. These criticisms include: a. Proposal does not adequately capture cause-and-effect relationships for the legal and research and development cost pools. For these cost pools, specific identification of individual projects with an individual division can better capture cause-and-effect relationships. b. Proposal may give rise to disputes over the definition and valuation of "identifiable assets." c. Use of actual rather than budgeted amounts in the allocation bases creates interdependencies between divisions. Moreover, use of actual amounts means that division managers do not know cost allocation consequences of their decisions until the end of each reporting period. d. Separate allocation of fixed and variable costs would result in more refined cost allocations. e. Questionable that 100% of central corporate costs should be allocated. Many students argue that public affairs should not be allocated to any division, based on the notion that division managers may not control many of the individual expenditures in this cost pool. 14-27 (25-30 min.) Allocation of central corporate costs to divisions. Print Book Total Multimedia Broadcasting Media Publishing Interest on debt $ 10,000,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 6,500,000 $ -0- $ -0- Research and development (40%, 30%, 0%, 30%) 100,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 -0- 30,000,000 Advertising (1,400: 4,500: 2,500: 1,600) 200,000,000 28,000,000 90,000,000 50,000,000 32,000,000 Human resource management (1,000: 3,000: 2,500: 1,500) 150,000,000 18,750,000 56,250,000 46,875,000 28,125,000 Corporate adminis- tration (150: 400: 250: 200) 50,000,000 7,500,000 20,000,000 12,500,000 10,000,000 Total $510,000,000 $ 97,750,000 $202,750,000 $109,375,000 $100,125,000 14-28 (60 min.) Customer-profitability analysis, customer cost hierarchy. 1. Item April Madison Suitors Design Revenues at list prices 17,600a $200; 12,400b $200; 6,360c $200; 6,250d $200 $3,520,000 $2,480,000 $1,272,000 $1,250,000 Discount 17,600 $60e; 12,400 $40f; 6,360 $30g; 6,250 $20h 1,056,000 496,000 190,800 125,000 Revenues (at actual prices) 2,464,000 1,984,000 1,081,200 1,125,000 Cost of goods sold 17,600 $110; 12,400 $110; 6,360 $110; 6,250 $110 1,936,000 1,364,000 699,600 687,500 Gross Margin 528,000 620,000 381,600 437,500 Customer-level operating costs Order processing 44, 62, 212, 250 $245 10,780 15,190 51,940 61,250 Sales visits 8, 12, 22, 20 $1,430 11,440 17,160 31,460 28,600 Delivery regular 41, 48, 166, 190 $300 12,300 14,400 49,800 57,000 Delivery rushed 3, 14, 46, 60 $850 2,550 11,900 39,100 51,000 Total customer-level operating costs 37,070 58,650 172,300 197,850 Customer-level operating income $ 490,930 $ 561,350 $ 209,300 $ 239,650 a44 400 = 17,600 b62 200 = 12,400 c212 30 = 6,360 d250 25 = 6,250 e$200 $140 = $60 f$200 $160 = $40 g$200 $170 = $30 h$200 $180 = $20 2. Key challenges facing Sims are: Reduce level of price discounting, especially by April Reduce level of customer-level costs, especially by Suitors and Design The ABC cost system highlights areas where the Suitors and Design accounts are troublesome. They have: A high number of orders, A high number of customer visits, and A high number of rushed deliveries. Sims needs to consider whether this high level of activity can be reduced without reducing customer revenues. 3. Solution Exhibit 14-28 presents a customer cost hierarchy report for Zoots Suits,  14-29 (40 min.) Customer profitability, distribution. 1.Customer P QRS TRevenues at list pricesa$29,952$126,000$875,520$457,920$56,160Discountb 0 2,100 72,960 15,264 5,616Revenues (at actual prices) Cost of goods soldc Gross margin Customer-level operating costs29,952 24,960 4,992123,900 105,000 18,900802,560 729,600 72,960442,656 381,600 61,05650,544 46,800 3,744Order takingd1,5002,5003,0002,5003,000Customer visitse160240480160240Delivery vehiclesf2802403606401,600Product handlingg1,0404,37530,40015,9001,950Expedited runsh 0 0 0 0 300Total 2,980 7,355 34,240 19,200 7,090Customer-level operating income$ 2,012$ 11,545$ 38,720$ 41,856$ (3,346) a $14.40 ( 2,080; 8,750; 60,800; 31,800; 3,900 b ($0.00 ( 50,000); ($0.24 ( 8,750); ($1.20 ( 60,800); ($0.48 ( 31,800; $1.44 ( 3,900) c $12 ( 2,080; 8,750; 60,800, 31,800; 3,900 d $100 ( 15; 25; 30; 25; 30 e $80 ( 2; 3; 6; 2; 3 f $2 ( (10 ( 14); (30 ( 4); (60 ( 3); (40 ( 8); (20 ( 40) g $0.50 ( 2,080; 8,750; 60,800; 31,800; 3,900 h $300 ( 0; 0; 0; 0; 1 Customer S is the most profitable customer, despite having only 52% of the unit volume of Customer R. A major explanation is that Customer R receives a $1.20 discount per case while Customer S receives only a $0.48 discount per case. Customer T is unprofitable, despite the smaller customer P being profitable. Customer T receives a $1.44 discount per case, makes more frequent orders, requires more customer visits, and requires more delivery miles than Customer P. 2. Separate reporting of both the list selling price and the actual selling price enables Spring Distribution to examine which customers receive different discounts and how salespeople may differ in the discounts they grant. There is a size pattern in the discounts across the 5 customers, except for Customer T: Sales Volume Discount per case R (60,800 cases) $1.20 S (31,800 cases) $0.48 Q (8,750 cases) $0.24 T (3,900 cases) $1.44 P (2,080 cases) $0.00 14-29 (Cont'd.) The reasons for the $1.44 discount for T should be explored. 3. Dropping customers should be the last resort taken by Spring Distribution. Factors to consider include: a. What is the expected future profitability of each customer? Are the currently unprofitable (T) or low-profit (P) customers likely to be highly profitable in the future? b. Are there externalities from having some customers, even if they are unprofitable in the short run? For example, some customers have a marque-value that is "in effect" advertising that benefits the business. c. What costs are avoidable if one or more customers are dropped? d. Can the relationship with the "problem" customers be restructured so that there is a "win-win" situation? For example, could Customer T get by with fewer deliveries per month? 14-30 (40 min.) Customer loyalty clubs and profitability analysis. 1. Gold ProgramRevenues 2,430 20 ($200 ( 0.90)$ 8,748,000 2,430 30 ($200 ( 0.80) 11,664,000 2,430 10 ($200 ( 0.70) 3,402,000 Total revenues 23,814,000Variable Costs Hotel variable costs, 2,430 ( 60 ( $65 9,477,000 Wine Costs 2,430 ( 50 ( $5 607,500 2,430 ( 10 ( $20 486,000 Restaurant costs 2,430 ( 20 ( $10 486,000 2,430 ( 30 ( $15 1,093,500 2,430 ( 10 ( $20 486,000 Total variable costs 12,636,000Contribution margin$11,178,000 14-30 (Contd.) Silver ProgramRevenues 8,340 ( 20 ( ($200 ( 0.90)$30,024,000 8,340 ( 15 ( ($200 ( 0.80) 20,016,000 Total revenues 50,040,000Variable Costs Hotel variable costs, 8,340 35 $65 18,973,500 Wine costs, 8,340 35 $5 1,459,500 Restaurant Costs 8,340 ( 20 ( $10 1,668,000 8,340 ( 15 ( $15 1,876,500 Total variable costs 23,977,500Contribution margin$26,062,500Bronze ProgramRevenues, 80,300 ( 10 ( ($200 ( 0.90)$144,540,000Variable costs Hotel variable costs, 80,300 ( 10 ( $65 52,195,000 Wine costs 80,300 ( 10 ( $5 4,015,000 Restaurant costs 80,300 ( 10 ( $10 8,030,000 Total variable costs 64,240,000Contribution margin$ 80,300,000No ProgramRevenues, 219,000 1 $200 $43,800,000Variable costs, 219,000 1 $65 14,235,000Contribution margin$29,565,000 Loyalty ProgramTotal RevenuesVariable CostsContribution MarginContrib. Margin Total RevenuesGold$ 23,814,000$ 12,636,000$ 11,178,000 46.94%Silver 50,040,000 23,977,500 26,062,500 52.08Bronze 144,540,000 64,240,000 80,300,000 55.56No program 43,800,000 14,235,000 29,565,000 67.50Total$262,194,000$115,088,500$147,105,500 The no-program group of customers has the highest contribution margin per revenue dollar. However, it comprises only 16.71% ($43,800,000 ( $262,194,000) of total revenues. The gold program has the lowest contribution margin per revenue dollar. However, it is misleading to evaluate each program in isolation. A key aim of loyalty programs is to promote a high frequency of return business. The contribution margin to total revenue ratio of each program in isolation does not address this issue. 14-30 (Cont'd.) 2. Revenues$262,194,000Variable costs 115,088,500Contribution margin 147,105,500Fixed costs 140,580,000Operating income$ 6,525,500 Number of room nights Gold, 2,430 60 145,800Silver, 8,340 35 291,900Bronze, 80,300 10 803,000No program, 219,000 1 219,0001,459,700 Average room rate per night:  EMBED Equation.2  Average variable cost per night:  EMBED Equation.3  Sherriton Hotels has fixed costs of $140,580,000. A key challenge is to attract a high number of repeat business customers. Loyalty programs aim to have customers return to Sherriton multiple times. Their aim is increasing the revenues beyond what they would be without the program. It is to be expected that the higher the level of nights stayed, the greater the inducements necessary to keep attracting the customer to return. However, given the low level of variable costs to room rates, there is considerable cushion available for Sherriton to offer high inducements for frequent stayers. Sherriton could adopt a net present value analysis of customers who are in the different loyalty clubs. It would be informative for Sherriton to have information on how much of each customers total lodging industry expenditures it captures. It may well want to give higher levels of inducements to frequent stayers if the current program attracts only, say, 30% of each of its frequent customers total business in cities where it has lodging properties available. 14-31 (30 min.) Customer profitability, customer cost hierarchy. 1. (All amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars) Wholesale Retail North America South America Big Sam World Wholesaler Wholesaler Stereo Market Revenues at list prices $400,000 $600,000 $130,000 $100,000 Discount 30,000 50,000 7,000 0 Revenues (at actual prices) 370,000 550,000 123,000 100,000 Cost of goods sold 325,000 490,000 112,000 92,000 Gross margin 45,000 60,000 11,000 8,000 Customer-level operating costs Product handling 5,000 6,000 800 900 Order processing 800 1,000 200 130 Delivery: Regular 300 450 150 80 Expedited 120 200 10 5 Sales visit 480 550 240 165 Total cust.-level optg.costs 6,700 8,200 1,400 1,280 Customer-level operating income $ 38,300 $ 51,800 $ 9,600 $ 6,720 14-31 (Contd.) 2. Customer Distribution Channels (All amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars)Wholesale CustomersRetail CustomersTotalTotalNorth America WholesalerSouth America WholesalerTotalBig Sam StereoWorld MarketRevenues (at actual prices)$1,143,000$920,000$370,000$550,000$223,000$123,000$100,000Customer-level costs 1,036,580 829,900 331,700 498,200 206,680 113,400 93,280Customer-level operating income 106,420 90,100$ 38,300$ 51,800 16,320$ 9,600$ 6,720Distribution- channel costs 40,000 30,000 10,000Distribution- channel- level operating income 66,420$ 60,100$ 6,320Corporate- sustaining costs 60,000Operating income$ 6,420 14-32 (60 min.) Variance analysis, sales-mix, and sales-quantity variances. 1. Actual Contribution Margins Product Actual Selling PriceActual Variable Costs per UnitActual Contribution Margin per UnitActual Sales Volume in UnitsActual Contribution DollarsActual Contribution PercentPalm Pro$349$178$17111,000$ 1,881,000 16%Palm CE2859219344,0008,492,000 71%PalmKid1027329 55,000 1,595,000 13%110,000$11,968,000100%The actual average contribution margin per unit is $108.80 ($11,968,000 ( 110,000 units). Budgeted Contribution Margins Product Budgeted Selling PriceBudgeted Variable Costs per UnitBudgeted Contribution Margin per UnitBudgeted Sales Volume in Units Budgeted Contribution Dollars Budgeted Contribution PercentPalm Pro$379$182$19712,500$ 2,462,500 19%Palm CE2699817137,500 6,412,500 49%Palm Kid1496584 50,000 4,200,000 32%100,000$13,075,000100%The budgeted average contribution margin per unit is $130.75 ($13,075,000 ( 100,000 units). 2. Actual Sales Mix ProductActual Sales Volume in Units Actual Sales MixPalm Pro11,000 10.0% (11,000 110,000)Palm CE44,000 40.0% (44,000 110,000)Palm Kid 55,000 50.0% (55,000 110,000)110,000 100.0%Budgeted Sales Mix ProductBudgeted Sales Volume in Units Budgeted Sales MixPalm Pro12,500 12.5% (12,500 100,000)Palm CE37,500 37.5% (37,500 100,000)Palm Kid 50,000 50.0% (50,000 100,000)100,000100.0% 14-32 (Cont'd.) 3. Sales-volume variance: =  EMBED Equation.3  (  EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3  PalmPro (11,000 ( 12,500) $197 $ 295,500 U PalmCE (44,000 ( 37,500) $171 1,111,500 F PalmKid (55,000 ( 50,000) $ 84 420,000 F Total sales-volume variance $1,236,000 F Sales-mix variance: =  EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3  (  EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3  PalmPro = 110,000 (0.10 ( 0.125) $197 $541,750 U PalmCE = 110,000 (0.40 ( 0.375) $171 470,250 F PalmKid = 110,000 (0.50 ( 0.50) $ 84 0 F Total sales-mix variance $ 71,500 U Sales-quantity variance: =  EMBED Equation.3 (  EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3  PalmPro (110,000 ( 100,000) 0.125 $197 $ 246,250 F PalmCE (110,000 ( 100,000 0.375 $171 641,250 F PalmKid (110,000 ( 100,000) 0.50 $ 84 420,000 F Total sales-quantity variance $1,307,500 F 14-32 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-32 presents the sales-volume variance, the sales-mix variance, and the sales-quantity variance for Palm Pro, Palm CE, and PalmKid and in total for Third Quarter 2004 SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-32 Sales-Mix and Sales-Quantity Variance Analysis of Aussie Infonautics for Third Quarter 2004  Flexible Budget: Static Budget: Actual Units of Actual Units of Budgeted Units of All Products Sold All Products Sold All Products Sold ( Actual Sales Mix ( Budgeted Sales Mix ( Budgeted Sales Mix ( Budgeted Contribution ( Budgeted Contribution ( Budgeted Contribution Margin Per Unit Margin Per Unit Margin Per Unit Palm Pro 110,000 ( 0.10 ( $197 =$ 2,167,000 110,000 ( 0.125 ( $197 =$ 2,708,750 100,000 ( 0.125 ( $197 =$ 2,462,500 PalmCE 110,000 ( 0.40 ( $171 = 7,524,000 110,000 ( 0.375 ( $171 = 7,053,750 100,000 ( 0.375 ( $171 = 6,412,500 PalmKid 110,000 ( 0.50 ( $ 84 = 4,620,000 110,000 ( 0.50 ( $ 84 = 4,620,000 100,000 ( 0.50 ( $ 84 = 4,200,000  $14,311,000 $14,382,500 $13,075,000  $71,500 U $1,307,500 F  Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance  $1,236,000 F Sales-volume variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U= unfavorable effect on operating income 4. The following factors help us understand the differences between actual and budgeted amounts. The difference in actual versus budgeted contribution margins was $1,107,000 unfavorable ($11,968,000 ( $13,075,000). However, the contribution margin from the PalmCE exceeded budget by $2,079,500 while the contributions from the PalmPro and the PalmKid were lower than expected and offset this gain. This is attributable to lower unit sales in the case of PalmPro and lower contribution margins in the case of PalmKid. In percentage terms, the PalmCE accounted for 71% of actual contribution margin versus a planned 49% contribution margin. However, the PalmPro accounted for 16% versus planned 19% and the PalmKid accounted for only 13% versus a planned 32%. In unit terms (rather than in contribution terms), the PalmKid accounted for 50% of the sales mix as planned. However, the PalmPro accounted for only 10% versus a budgeted 12.5% and the PalmCE accounted for 40% versus a planned 37.5%. Variance analysis for the PalmPro shows an unfavorable sales-mix variance outweighing a favorable sales-quantity variance and producing an unfavorable sales-volume variance. The drop in sales-mix share was far larger than the gain from an overall greater quantity sold. The PalmCE gained both from an increase in share of the sales mix as well as from the increase in the overall number of units sold. The PalmKid maintained sales-mix share at 50%as a result, the sales-mix variance is zero. However, PalmKid sales did gain from the overall increase in units sold. 14-32 (Cont'd.) Overall, there was a favorable total sales-volume variance. However, the large drop in PalmKids contribution margin per unit combined with a decrease in the actual number of PalmPro units sold as well as a drop in the actual contribution margin per unit below budget, led to the total contribution margin being much lower than budgeted. Other factors could be discussed herefor example, it seems that the PalmKid did not achieve much success with a three digit price pointselling price was budgeted at $149 but dropped to $102. At the same time, variable costs increased. This could have been due to a marketing push that did not succeed. 14-33 (20 min.) Market-share and market-size variances (continuation of 14-32). 1. Actual BudgetedWorldwide500,000400,000Aussie Info.110,000100,000Market share22%25% Average contribution margin per unit: Actual = $108.80 ($11,968,000 ( 110,000) Budgeted = $130.75 ($13,075,000 ( 100,000)  EMBED Equation.2  =  EMBED Equation.2  ( EMBED Equation.2 =500,000 ( (0.22 0.25) ( $130.75=500,000 ( (0.03) ( $130.75=$1,961,250 U  EMBED Equation.2  =  EMBED Equation.2  ( EMBED Equation.2 =(500,000 400,000) ( 0.25 ( $130.75=100,000 ( 0.25 ( $130.75=$3,268,750 F 14-33 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-33 presents the market-share variance, the market-size variance, and the sales-quantity variance for Third Quarter 2004. SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-33 Market-Share and Market-Size Variance Analysis of Aussie Infonautics for Third Quarter 2004 Static Budget: Actual Market Size Actual Market Size Budgeted Market Size ( Actual Market Share ( Budgeted Market Share ( Budgeted Market Share ( Budgeted Average ( Budgeted Average ( Budgeted Average Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit 500,000 ( 0.22a ( $130.75b 500,000 ( 0.25c ( $130.75 b 400,000 ( 0.25c ( $130.75b  $14,382,500 $16,343,750 $13,075,000  $1,961,250 U $3,268,750 F  Market-share variance Market-size variance  $1,307,500 F Sales-quantity variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income aActual market share: 110,000 units 500,000 units = 0.22, or 22% bBudgeted average contribution margin per unit $13,075,000 100,000 units = $130.75 per unit cBudgeted market share: 100,000 units 400,000 units = 0.25, or 25% 2. While the market share declined (from 25% to 22%), the overall increase in the total market size meant a favorable sales-quantity variance: Sales-Quantity Variance $1,307,500 F Market-Share VarianceMarket Size Variance$1,961,250 U$3,268,750 F 14-33 (Contd.) The required actual market size is the budgeted market size, i.e., 400,000 units. This can easily be seen by setting up the following equation:  EMBED Equation.3  = (M 400,000) 0.25 $130.75When M = 400,000, the market-size variance is $0. Actual Market-Share CalculationAgain, the answer is the budgeted market share, 25%. By definition, this will hold irrespective of the actual market size. This can be seen by setting up the appropriate equation:Actual Market Size (M 25%) $130.75 = $0 When M = 25%, the market-share variance is $0. 14-34 (40 min.) Variance analysis, multiple products. 1, 2, and 3. Solution Exhibit 14-34 presents the sales-volume, sales-quantity, and sales-mix variances for each type of cookie and in total for Debbie's Delight Inc. in August 2003. The sales-volume variances can also be computed as:  EQ \a(Sales-volume,variance) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual sales,quantity in pounds) \a(Budgeted sales,quantity in pounds))   EQ \a(Budgeted contribution,margin per pound)  The sales-volume variances are: Chocolate chip = (57,600 45,000) ( $2.00 = $25,200 F Oatmeal raisin = (18,000 25,000) ( $2.30 = 16,100 U Coconut = (9,600 10,000) ( $2.60 = 1,040 U White chocolate = (13,200 5,000) ( $3.00 = 24,600 F Macadamia nut = (21,600 15,000) ( $3.10 = 20,460 F All cookies $53,120 F The sales-quantity variance can also be computed as :  EQ \a(Sales-quantity,variance) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual pounds,of all cookies,sold) \a(Budgeted pounds,of all cookies,sold)) (  EQ \a(Budgeted,sales-mix, percentage)  (  EQ \a(Budgeted,contribution,margin per pound)  The sales-quantity variances are: Chocolate chip = (120,000 100,000) ( 0.45 ( $2.00 = $18,000 F Oatmeal raisin = (120,000 100,000) ( 0.25 ( $2.30 = 11,500 F Coconut = (120,000 100,000) ( 0.10 ( $2.60 = 5,200 F White chocolate = (120,000 100,000) ( 0.05 ( $3.00 = 3,000 F Macadamia nut = (120,000 100,000) ( 0.15 ( $3.10 = 9,300 F All cookies $47,000 F The sales-mix variance can also be computed as:  EQ \a(Sales-mix,variance)  =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual sales-,mix percentage) \a(Budgeted sales-, mix percentage)) (  EQ \a(Actual pounds,of all cookies,sold ) (  EQ \a(Budgeted, contribution, margin per pound)  The sales-mix variances are: Chocolate chip = (0.48 0.45) ( 120,000 ( $2.00 = $ 7,200 F Oatmeal raisin = (0.15 0.25) ( 120,000 ( $2.30 = 27,600 U Coconut = (0.08 0.10) ( 120,000 ( $2.60 = 6,240 U White chocolate = (0.11 0.05) ( 120,000 ( $3.00 = 21,600 F Macadamia nut = (0.18 0.15) ( 120,000 ( $3.10 = 11,160 F All cookies $ 6,120 F 14-34 (Contd.) A summary of the variances is: Sales-Volume Variance Chocolate chip $25,200 F Oatmeal raisin 16,100 U Coconut 1,040 U White chocolate 24,600 F Macadamia nut 20,460 F All cookies $53,120 F  EMBED Word.Picture.8  Sales-Mix Variance Chocolate chip $ 7,200 F Oatmeal raisin 27,600 U Coconut 6,240 U White chocolate 21,600 F Macadamia nut 11,160 F All cookies $ 6,120 FSales-Quantity Variance Chocolate chip $18,000 F Oatmeal raisin 11,500 F Coconut 5,200 F White chocolate 3,000 F Macadamia nut 9,300 F All cookies $47,000 F 4. Debbie's Delight shows a favorable sales-quantity variance because it sold more cookies in total than was budgeted. Together with the higher quantities, Debbie's also sold more of the high-contribution margin white chocolate and macadamia nut cookies relative to the budgeted mixhence, Debbie's also showed a favorable total sales-mix variance. 14-34 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-34 Columnar Presentation of Sales-Volume, Sales-Quantity, and Sales-Mix Variances for Debbie's Delight Inc. Flexible Budget: Actual Pounds of All Cookies Sold Actual Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound (1) Actual Pounds of All Cookies Sold Budgeted Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound (2)Static Budget: Budgeted Pounds of All Cookies Sold Budgeted Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound (3)Panel A: Chocolate Chip  (120,000 0.48a) $2 57,600 $2 (120,000 0.45b) $2 54,000 $2 (100,000 0.45b) $2 45,000 $2 $115,200 $108,000 $90,000 Panel B: Oatmeal Raisin (120,000 0.15c) $2.30 18,000 $2.30 (120,000 0.25d) $2.30 30,000 $2.30 (100,000 0.25d) $2.30 25,000 $2.30 $41,400 $69,000 $57,500 Panel C: Coconut  (120,000 0.08e) $2.60 9,600 $2.60 (120,000 0.10f) $2.60 12,000 $2.60 (100,000 0.10f) $2.60 10,000 $2.60 $24,960 $31,200 $26,000  F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income. Actual Sales Mix: aChocolate Chip = 57,600 120,000 = 48% cOatmeal Raisin = 18,000 120,000 = 15% eCoconut = 9,600 120,000 = 8%Budgeted Sales Mix: bChocolate Chip = 45,000 100,000 = 45% dOatmeal Raisin = 25,000 100,000 = 25% f Coconut = 10,000 100,000 = 10%  14-34 (Contd.) SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-34 (Contd.) Columnar Presentation of Sales-Volume, Sales-Quantity, and Sales-Mix Variances for Debbie's Delight Inc. Flexible Budget: Actual Pounds of All Cookies Sold Actual Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound (1) Actual Pounds of All Cookies Sold Budgeted Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound (2)Static Budget: Budgeted Pounds of All Cookies Sold Budgeted Sales Mix Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound (3)Panel D: White Chocolate (120,000 0.11g) $3.00 13,200 $3.00 (120,000 0.05h) $3.00 6,000 $3.00 (100,000 0.05h) $3.00 5,000 $3.00 $39,600 $18,000 $15,000  Panel E: Macadamia Nut (120,000 0.18j) $3.10 21,600 $3.10 (120,000 0.15k) $3.10 18,000 $3.10 (100,000 0.15k) $3.10 15,000 $3.10 $66,960 $55,800 $46,500  Panel F: $288,120l $282,000m $235,000n All Cookies F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income. Actual Sales Mix: gWhite Chocolate = 13,200 120,000 = 11% jMacadamia Nut = 21,600 120,000 = 18% l$115,200 + $41,400 + $24,960 + $39,600 + $66,960 = $288,120 Budgeted Sales Mix: hWhite Chocolate =5,000 100,000 = 5% kMacadamia Nut = 15,000 100,000 = 15% m$108,000 + $69,000 + $31,200 + $18,000 + $55,800 = $282,000 n$90,000 + $57,500 + $26,000 + $15,000 + $46,500 = $235,00014-35 (15 min.) Market-share and market-size variances (continuation of 14-34). 1. ActualBudgetedChicago Market Debbie's Delight Market share960,000 120,000 0.1251,000,000 100,000 0.100The budgeted average contribution margin per unit (also called budgeted contribution margin per composite unit for budgeted mix) is $2.35: Budgeted Contribution Margin per Pound Budgeted Sales Volume in Pounds Budgeted Contribution MarginChocolate chip Oatmeal raisin Coconut White chocolate Macadamia nut All cookies$2.00 2.30 2.60 3.00 3.1045,000 25,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 100,000$ 90,000 57,500 26,000 15,000 46,500 $235,000 EQ \a\al( Budgeted average,contribution margin per unit)  =  EMBED Equation.3 = $2.35  EQ \a\al(Market-size,variance in,contribution margin)  =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,market size,in units) \a(Budgeted,market size,in units))   EQ \a(Budgeted,market,share)   EQ \a(Budgeted,average,contrib. margin, per unit)  = (960,000 1,000,000) 0.100 $2.35 = $9,400 U  EQ \a\al(Market-share,variance in,contribution margin)  =  EQ \a(Actual,market size,in units)   EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,market,share) \a(Budgeted,market,share))   EQ \a(Budgeted,average,contrib. margin,per unit)  = 960,000 (0.125 0.100) $2.35 = $56,400 F By increasing its actual market share from the 10% budgeted to the actual 12.50%, Debbie's Delight has a favorable market-share variance of $56,400. There is a smaller offsetting unfavorable market-size variance of $9,400 due to the 40,000 unit decline in the Chicago market (from 1,000,000 budgeted to an actual of 960,000). 14-35 (Contd.) Solution Exhibit 14-35 presents the sales-quantity, market-share, and market-size variances for Debbies Delight Inc. in August 2003. SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-35 Market-Share and Market-Size Variance Analysis of Debbies Delight for August 2003 Static Budget: Actual Market Size Actual Market Size Budgeted Market Size ( Actual Market Share ( Budgeted Market Share ( Budgeted Market Share ( Budgeted Average ( Budgeted Average ( Budgeted Average Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit 960,000 ( 0.125a ( $2.35b 960,000 ( 0.10c ( $2.35b 1,000,000 ( 0.10c ( $2.35b  $282,000 $225,600 $235,000  $56,400 F $9,400 U  Market-share variance Market-size variance  $47,000 F Sales-quantity variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income aActual market share: 120,000 units 960,000 units = 0.125, or 12.5% bBudgeted average contribution margin per unit: $235,000 1,000,000 units = $2.35 per unit cBudgeted market share: 100,000 units 1,000,000 units = 0.10, or 10% An overview of Problems 14-34 and 14-35 is:    14-36 (2025 min.) Direct materials efficiency, mix and yield variances (Chapter Appendix). 1 & 2. Actual total quantity of all inputs used and actual input mix percentages for each input are as follows: ChemicalActual QuantityActual Mix PercentageEchol Protex Benz CT-40 Total24,080 15,480 36,120 10,320 86,00024,080 86,000 = 0.28 15,480 86,000 = 0.18 36,120 86,000 = 0.42 10,320 86,000 = 0.12 1.00 Budgeted total quantity of all inputs allowed and budgeted input mix percentages for each input are as follows: ChemicalBudgeted QuantityBudgeted Mix PercentageEchol Protex Benz CT-40 Total25,200 16,800 33,600 8,400 84,00025,200 84,000 = 0.30 16,800 84,000 = 0.20 33,600 84,000 = 0.40 8,400 84,000 = 0.10 1.00 Solution Exhibit 14-36 presents the total direct materials efficiency, yield, and mix variances for August 2003. Total direct materials efficiency variance can also be computed as:  EQ \a(Direct materials,efficiency variance,for each input) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,inputs) \a(Budgeted inputs allowed,for actual outputs achieved))   EQ \a(Budgeted,prices)  Echol = (24,080 25,200) $0.20 = $224 F Protex = (15,480 16,800) $0.45 = 594 F Benz = (36,120 33,600) $0.15 = 378 U CT40 = (10,320 8,400) $0.30 = 576 U Total direct materials efficiency variance $136 U The total direct materials yield variance can also be computed as the sum of the direct materials yield variances for each input:  EQ \a(Direct,materials,yield variance,for each input) = EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual total,quantity of all,direct materials,inputs used) \a(Budgeted total quantity,of all direct materials,inputs allowed for,actual output achieved))  EQ \a(Budgeted,direct materials,input mix,percentage)  EQ \a(Budgeted,price of,direct materials,inputs) Echol = (86,000 84,000) 0.30 $0.20 = 2,000 0.30 $0.20 = $120 U Protex = (86,000 84,000) 0.20 $0.45 = 2,000 0.20 $0.45 = 180 U Benz = (86,000 84,000) 0.40 $0.15 = 2,000 0.40 $0.15 = 120 U CT40 = (86,000 84,000) 0.10 $0.30 = 2,000 0.10 $0.30 = 60 U Total direct materials yield variance $480 U 14-36 (Cont'd.) The total direct materials mix variance can also be computed as the sum of the direct materials mix variances for each input:  EQ \a(Direct,materials,mix variance,for each input) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,direct materials,input mix,percentage) \a(Budgeted,direct materials,input mix,percentage))   EMBED Equation.3   EMBED Equation.3  Echol = (0.28 0.30) 86,000 $0.20 = 0.02 86,000 $0.20 = $344 F Protex = (0.18 0.20) 86,000 $0.45 = 0.02 86,000 $0.45 = 774 F Benz = (0.42 0.40) 86,000 $0.15 = 0.02 86,000 $0.15 = 258 U CT40 = (0.12 0.10) 86,000 $0.30 = 0.02 86,000 $0.30 = 516 U Total direct materials mix variance $344 F 3. Energy Products used a larger total quantity of direct materials inputs than budgeted, and so showed an unfavorable yield variance. The mix variance was favorable because the actual mix contained more of the cheapest input, Benz, and less of the most costly input, Protex, than the budgeted mix. The favorable mix variance offset some, but not all, of the unfavorable yield variancethe overall efficiency variance was unfavorable. Energy Products will find it profitable to shift to the cheaper mix only if the yield from this cheaper mix can be improved. Energy Products must also consider the effect on output quality of using the cheaper mix, and the potential consequences for future revenues. Solution Exhibit 14-36 Columnar Presentation of Direct Materials Efficiency,Yield and Mix Variances for The Energy Products Company for August 2003  Actual Total Quantity of All Inputs Used Actual Input Mix Budgeted Price (1) Actual Total Quantity of All Inputs Used Budgeted Input Mix Budgeted Price (2)Flexible Budget: Budgeted Total Quantity of All Inputs Allowed for Actual Output Achieved Budgeted Input Mix Budgeted Price (3)Echol 86,000 0.28 $0.20 = $ 4,816 Protex 86,000 0.18 $0.45 = 6,966 Benz 86,000 0.42 $0.15 = 5,418 CT40 86,000 0.12 $0.30 = 3,096 $20,29686,000 0.30 $0.20 = $ 5,160 86,000 0.20 $0.45 = 7,740 86,000 0.40 $0.15 = 5,160 86,000 0.10 $0.30 = 2,580 $20,640 84,000 0.30 $0.20 = $ 5,040 84,000 0.20 $0.45 = 7,560 84,000 0.40 $0.15 = 5,040 84,000 0.10 $0.30 = 2,520 $20,160  $344 F $480 U  Total mix variance Total yield variance $136 U Total efficiency variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income 14-37 (35 min.) Direct materials price, efficiency, mix and yield variances (Chapter Appendix). 1. Solution Exhibit 14-37A presents the total price variance ($3,100F), the total efficiency variance ($2,560U), and the total flexible-budget variance ($540F). Total direct materials price variance can also be computed as:  EQ \a(Direct materials,price variance,for each input) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,Price) \a(Budgeted,Price))   EQ \a(Actual,Inputs)  Tolman = ($0.28 $0.30) 62,000 = $1,240 F Golden Delicious = ($0.26 $0.26) 155,000 = 0 Ribston = ($0.20 $0.22) 93,000 = 1,860 F Total direct materials price variance $3,100 F Total direct materials efficiency variance can also be computed as:  EQ \a(Direct materials,efficiency variance,for each input) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,inputs) \a(Budgeted inputs allowed,for actual outputs achieved))   EQ \a(Budgeted,prices)  Tolman = ( 62,000 45,000) $0.30 = $5,100 U Golden Delicious = (155,000 180,000) $0.26 = 6,500 F Ribston = ( 93,000 75,000) $0.22 = 3,960 U Total direct materials efficiency variance $2,560 U SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-37A Columnar Presentation of Direct Materials Price and Efficiency Variances for Greenwood Inc. for November 2003  Actual Costs Incurred (Actual Inputs Actual Prices) (1) Actual Input Budgeted Prices (2)Flexible Budget (Budgeted Inputs Allowed for Actual Outputs Achieved Budgeted Prices) (3)Tolman Golden Delicious Ribston 62,000 $0.28 = $17,360 155,000 $0.26 = 40,300 93,000 $0.20 = 18,600 $76,260 62,000 $0.30 = $18,600 155,000 $0.26 = 40,300 93,000 $0.22 = 20,460 $79,360 45,000 $0.30 = $13,500 180,000 $0.26 = 46,800 75,000 $0.22 = 16,500 $76,800 $3,100 F $2,560 U Total price variance Total efficiency variance  $540 F Total flexible-budget variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income 14-37 (Cont'd.) 2. Solution Exhibit 14-37B presents the total direct materials yield and mix variances for Greenwood Inc. for November 2003. The total direct materials yield variance can also be computed as the sum of the direct materials yield variances for each input:  EQ \a(Direct,materials,yield variance,for each input) = EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual total,quantity of all,direct materials,inputs used) \a(Budgeted total quantity,of all direct materials,inputs allowed for,actual output achieved))   EQ \a(Budgeted,direct materials,input mix,percentage)   EQ \a(Budgeted,price of,direct materials,inputs) Tolman = (310,000 300,000) 0.15 $0.30 = 10,000 0.15 $0.30 = $ 450 U Golden Delicious = (310,000 300,000) 0.60 $0.26 = 10,000 0.60 $0.26 = 1,560 U Ribston = (310,000 300,000) 0.25 $0.22 = 10,000 0.25 $0.22 = 550 U Total direct materials yield variance $2,560 U The total direct materials mix variance can also be computed as the sum of the direct materials mix variances for each input:  EQ \a(Direct,materials,mix variance,for each input) =  EQ \b\bc(\a(Actual,direct materials,input mix,percentage) \a(Budgeted,direct materials,input mix,percentage))   EQ \a(Actual total,quantity of all,direct materials,inputs used)   EQ \a(Budgeted,price of,direct materials,inputs)  Tolman = (0.20 0.15) 310,000 $0.30 = 0.05 310,000 $0.30 = $4,650 U Golden Delicious = (0.50 0.60) 310,000 $0.26 = 0.10 310,000 $0.26 = 8,060 F Ribston = (0.30 0.25) 310,000 $0.22 = 0.05 310,000 $0.22 = 3,410 U Total direct materials mix variance $ 0 U 3. Greenwood paid less for Tolman and Ribston apples and, so, had a favorable direct materials price variance of $3,100. It also had an unfavorable efficiency variance of $2,560. Greenwood would need to evaluate if these were unrelated events or if the lower price resulted from the purchase of apples of poorer quality that affected efficiency. The net effect in this case from a cost standpoint was favorablethe savings in price being greater than the loss in efficiency. Of course, if the applesauce is of poorer quality, Greenwood must also evaluate the potential effects on current and future revenues that have not been considered in the variances described in requirements 1 and 2. The unfavorable efficiency variance is entirely attributable to an unfavorable yield. The actual mix does deviate from the budgeted mix but at the budgeted prices, the greater quantity of Tolman and Ribston apples used in the actual mix exactly offsets the fewer Golden Delicious apples used. Again, management should evaluate the reasons for the unfavorable yield variance. Is it due to poor quality Tolman and Ribston apples (recall from requirement 1 that these apples were acquired at a price lower than the standard price)? Is it due to the change in mix (recall that the mix used is different from the budgeted mix, even though the mix variance is $0)? Isolating the reasons can lead management to take the necessary corrective actions. 14-37 (Cont'd.) Solution Exhibit 14-37B Columnar Presentation of Direct Materials Yield and Mix Variances for Greenwood Inc. for November 2003  Actual Total Quantity of All Inputs Used Actual Input Mix Budgeted Prices (1) Actual Total Quantity of All Inputs Used Budgeted Input Mix Budgeted Prices (2)Flexible Budget: Budgeted Total Quantity of All Inputs Allowed for Actual Output Achieved Budgeted Input Mix Budgeted Prices (3) Tolman 310,000 0.20 $0.30= $18,600 Delicious 310,000 0.50 $0.26 = 40,300 Ribston 310,000 0.30 $0.22 = 20,460 $79,360 310,000 0.15 $0.30 = $13,950 310,000 0.60 $0.26 = 48,360 310,000 0.25 $0.22 = 17,050 $79,360 300,000 0.15 $0.30 = $13,500 300,000 0.60 $0.26 = 46,800 300,000 0.25 $0.22 = 16,500 $76,800 0 $2,560 U Total mix variance Total yield variance  $2,560 U Total efficiency variance F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income. 14-38 (1520 min.) Customer profitability, responsibility for environmental clean-up, ethics. 1. Customer-profitability analysis examines how individual customers differ in their profitability. The revenues and costs of each customer can be estimated with varying degrees of accuracy. Revenues of IF typically would be known at the time of sale. Many costs also would be known, e.g., the cost of materials used to manufacture the fluids sold to each customer. A major area of uncertainty is future costs associated with obligations arising from the sale. There are several issues here: a. Uncertainty as to the existence and extent of legal liability. Each customer has primary responsibility to dispose of its own toxic waste. However, under some U.S. laws (such as the "Superfund" laws), suppliers to a company may be partially liable for disposal of toxic material. Papandopolis needs to determine the extent of IF's liability. It would be necessary to seek legal guidance on this issue. b. Uncertainty as to when the liability will occur. The further in the future, the lower the amount of the liability (assuming discounting for the time-value of money occurs.) c. Uncertainty as to the amount of the liability, given that the liability exists and the date of the liability can be identified. Papandopolis faces major difficulties heresee the answer to requirement 2. 14-38 (Cont'd.) Many companies argue that uncertainties related to (a), (b), and (c) make the inclusion of "hard-dollar estimates meaningless." However, at a minimum, a contingent liability should be recognized and included in the internal customer-profitability reports. 2. Papandopolis' controller may believe that if estimates of future possible legal exposure are sufficiently uncertain, then they should not be recorded. His concern about "smoking guns" may have a very genuine basisthat is, if litigation arises, third parties may misrepresent Papandopolis' concerns to the detriment of IF. Any written comments that she makes may surface 5 or 10 years later and be interpreted as "widespread knowledge" within IF that they have responsibility for large amounts of environmental clean-up. Given this background, Papandopolis still has the responsibility to prepare a report in an objective and competent way. Moreover, she has visited 10 customer sites and has details as to their toxic-waste handling procedures. If Acme goes bankrupt and has no liability insurance, one of the "deep pockets" available to meet toxic waste handling costs is likely to be IF. At a minimum, she should report the likely bankruptcy and the existence of IF's contingent liability for toxic-waste clean-up in her report. Whether she quantifies this contingent liability is a more difficult question. Papandopolis has limited information available to make a meaningful quantification. She is not an employee of Acme Metal and has no information about Acme's liability insurance. Moreover, she does not know what other parties (such as other suppliers) are also jointly liable to pay Acme's clean-up costs. The appropriate course appears to highlight the contingent liability but to not attempt to quantify it. 14-39 (4060 min.) Customer profitability, credit card operations. 1.CustomerABCDCustomer revenues Annual fee Merchant paymentsa $ 50 1,600 $ 0 520 $ 50 680 $ 0 160Interest spreadb 540 0 180 9 Total 2,190 520 910 169Customer costs Annual maintenance costs Bad debt provisionc Transaction costsd 108 400 400 108 130 260 108 170 136 108 40 100Customer inquiriese30604010Card replacementsf 0 240 120 0Total 938 798 574 258Customer operating income$1,252$(278)$336$ (89)a 2% $80,000; $26,000; $34,000; $8,000 b 9% $6,000; $0; $2,000; $100 c 0.5% $80,000; $26,000; $34,000; $8,000 d $0.50 800; 520; 272; 200 e $5 6; 12; 8; 2 f $120 0; 2; 1; 0 Note: The above analysis uses the average 0.5% bad debt provision. Bay Bank may want to adjust individual customer-profitability reports at a subsequent date to reflect actual bad debt experience. 2.Profitable CustomersUnprofitable CustomersRevenues Fees Merchant payments Interest spread  Pays fee High billings and high billings per transaction High outstanding balance  Fee waived Low billings and low billings per transaction Pays on time and has no outstanding balanceCosts Bad debt "provision" Transaction costs Customer inquiries Card replacement Pays account Low number of transactions & high billings per transaction Zero or few inquiries No replacements Defaults on account High number of transactions & low billings per transaction Many inquiries Multiple replacements 14-39 (Cont'd.) 3. The pros of charging for individual services include: a. Additional source of revenues. If Bay Bank is able to charge more than the cost of each service, it may prefer that customers be prolific users of its services. b. If Bay Bank is not able to charge the "full cost" for each service, the charge may reduce customer usage (thus reducing the losses associated with providing services at below cost). For example, Customer B may make fewer inquiries about his or her balance. The cons of charging for individual services include: a. May cause customers to drop card or decrease its usage vis--vis competitors cards that have zero or minimal charges. b. May attract much negative publicity from consumer groups who target companies such as banks and credit card companies. 4. Factors to consider include: a. The growth potential of individual customers. Some low-volume credit customers (such as students) may be high-volume users in the medium run. b. The costs saved by discontinuing low-volume credit card customers. Many costs may be relatively "fixed" and may not be eliminated by dropping customers. c. The publicity Bay Bank may attract from discontinuing these customers. There is the potential for much negative publicity from such decisions. d. Alternatives available to discontinuance, e.g., adopt individual service charges. 5. The pros of providing the service at Lucky Roller include: a. Potential increased profitability due to higher usage by Freedom Card holders at Lucky Roller. b. Potential increased attraction to current and future Freedom Card holders. As a general rule, the more services available, the more attractive the card. Possible cons include: a. Potential bad debts. While money advances in general may have been profitable, it is possible that some specific money advance outlets may be unprofitable. Verdolini should examine this issue in more detail to determine if Bay Bank has made money advances at other gambling venues. b Potential negative publicity from media stories arguing that the Bay Bank is helping gamblers to lose money. These stories often focus on individuals with gambling addictions. c. Ethical position of the Bay Bank regarding gambling. Providing a money advance service at the casino may conflict with the ethical beliefs of senior management or the Board of Directors. Chapter 14 Internet Exercise The Internet exercise is available to students only on the Prentice Hall Companion Website HYPERLINK "http://www.prenhall.com/horngren"www.prenhall.com/horngren. Students can click on Cost Accounting, 11th ed., and access the Internet Exercise for the chapter, which links to the Web site of a company or organization. The Internet Exercise on the Web will be updated periodically so that it is current with the latest information available on the subject organization's Web site. A printout copy of the Internet exercise for this chapter as of early 2002 appears below. The solution to the Internet exercise, which will also be updated periodically, is available to instructors from the Companion Website's faculty view. To access the solution, click on Cost Accounting, 11th ed., Faculty link, and then register once to obtain your password through the online form. After the initial registration, you will have a personal login ID and password to use to log in. A printout of the solution to the Internet exercise for this chapter as of early 2002 follows. The exercise and solution provide instructors with an idea of the content of the Internet exercise for this chapter. Internet Exercise In an effort to refocus its business and improve revenue growth Hewlett-Packard (HP) spun off its test and measurement business through a stock dividend to its shareholders. The newly formed company, Agilent Technologies, reported $757 million in earnings on revenues of $9.4 billion in its first year of operations. Prior to the spinoff, HP accounted for Agilent as a separate business segment. 1a. Go to Hewlett-Packards investor relations Web page,  HYPERLINK http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/investor/ www.hp.com/hpinfo/investor/, click on the "SEC filings" link, and open the 10-K report filed on 1/27/00. This is HP's 1999 annual report. Scroll down to the segment information on page 49. What types of services and expense are shared between HP's four business segments? 1b. What is HP's rationale for sharing expenses and services between business segments? 1c. How does HP allocate the cost of shared expenses and services? 2. Why might HP face problems if it bases management compensation on the profitability of individual business segments? 3. Go to Agilent Technologies Investor Relations Web page,  HYPERLINK http://www.investor.agilent.com/ www.investor.agilent.com/, click on the "Annual Report" link, and open the 2000 annual report. Scroll down to footnote 14, "Transactions with Hewlett-Packard," on page 40. 3a. What were Agilent's sales to HP for the period from November 1, 1999 to June 2, 2000? 3b. What were Agilent's purchases from HP in the period from November 1, 1999 through June 2, 2000? 4a. Prior to the spin-off, shared expenses were allocated between HP's business segments. How have Agilent and HP handled shared expenses since the spin-off? 4b. What was the value of shared services for November 1, 1999, to June 2, 2000? Internet Exercise (Contd.) 4c. What is the additional implication of shared expenses between Agilent and HP now that they are independent companies? 4d. Scroll down the "Transactions with Hewlett-Packard" footnote. What other separation agreements have Agilent and HP entered into? Solution to Internet Exercise 1a. A significant portion of the segments' expenses arise from shared services and infrastructure that HP has historically provided to the segments in order to realize economies of scale and to use resources efficiently. These expenses include costs of centralized research and development, legal, accounting, employee benefits, real estate, insurance services, information technology services, treasury and other corporate and infrastructure costs. 1b. HP has historically provided services to the segments in order to realize economies of scale and to use resources efficiently. 1c. These allocations have been determined on bases that HP considers to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the segments. If costs were specifically identified to each segment, amounts could vary from the allocated cost. 2. HP may face problems if it bases compensation on the profitability of individual business segments. Since the cost of shared expenses are not bargained for in an arms length transaction, managers may argue about their reasonableness. Managers should be evaluated on the basis of controllable costs and revenues or perhaps the performance of the entire organization. 3a. Agilent's sales to HP for the period November 1, 1999, to June 2, 2000, were $341 million, 3b. Purchases from HP were approximately $122 million. 4a. Agilent and HP entered into interim service level agreements, for various services, including information technology, financial, accounting, building, and legal services. These services are generally being provided for fees equal to the actual direct and indirect costs of providing the services plus 5%. 4b. Agilent received $267 million from HP and HP received $95 million in services from Agilent. 4c. In addition to tax implications, there will be tax implications for the shareholder of each company. Any misallocation of expenses will affect each company's cash flow, earnings, and share price. Internet Exercise (Contd.) 5. Agilent and HP have entered into separation agreements covering: General Assignment and Assumption of Assets and Liabilities Indemnification and Insurance Matters Employee Matters Tax Sharing Real Estate Matters Information Technology Sharing Intellectual Property Environmental Matters Chapter 14 Video Case The video case can be discussed using only the case writeup in the chapter. Alternatively, instructors can have students view the videotape of the company that is the subject of the case. The videotape can be obtained by contacting your Prentice Hall representative. The case questions challenge students to apply the concepts learned in the chapter to a specific business situation. NANTUCKET NECTARS: COST ALLOCATION VIDEO CASE 1. The types of economic decisions faced by Nantucket Nectars might include deciding which new juice flavors to introduce to the market, which to discontinue, and how many new flavors the market can absorb. In determining which flavors are most profitable, Nantucket Nectars would need to allocate the costs of the Mobile Juice Guy Team to the different flavors, based perhaps on the time the Mobile Team spends promoting the different flavors and the samples and coupons it distributes. The company may also be interested in determining the profitability of its different regions. To calculate this profitability, the costs of the Mobile Juice Guy Team would need to be allocated to the different regions. The costs of the Mobile Team are: van depreciation, insurance, full-time employee salaries, depreciation of display tables and banners, travel costs (lodging, meals, vehicle gas, and maintenance), coupons, juice beverages, and sample cups. The costs that would go into the fixed- cost subpool are: depreciation on the full-size van, depreciation on the banners and display tables, insurance on the van and equipment, and salaries for the four Mobile Team members. The variable subpool costs would include coupons, bottled juice flavors dispensed, sample cups, and travel expenses for the team. The most appropriate activity base used for allocating the subpool costs would be the time spent in each region, including travel days to the region. 2. Nantucket Nectars could motivate regional sales managers to use more of the Mobile Juice Guy Team by not allocating the full cost of the Team to regional managers. Such a system may, however, lead regional managers to overuse the Mobile Team. 3. Nantucket Nectars would need to cost-justify the Mobile Teams operations to be sure the company is getting the necessary sales and profitability boost expected for this set of expenditures. This requires the company to estimate the sales and profitability attributable to the Mobile Team. 4. Although the company is privately held, it still must produce internal financial reports for use by management and external reports for tax purposes. The company also has a majority shareholder, Ocean Spray, for whom reports must be generated. Cost allocation can help with appropriately valuing inventory and assets associated with operations. PAGE  14- PAGE 9 14- PAGE 55 $100 $150 -$50 $50 -$100 OKIE, $142 WIZARD, $97 AVERY, $78 SOFTWARE, $74 BUSINESS, $27 GRAINGER, $6 DURAN ($4) RETAIL ($15) PROBLEM ($32) SANTA ($73) Operating Income $0 $6,120 F Total sales-mix variance $47,000 F Total sales-quantity variance $53,120 F Total sales-volume variance $11,160 F Sales-mix variance $9,300 F Sales-quantity variance $20,460 F Sales-volume variance $21,600 F Sales-mix variance $3,000 F Sales-quantity variance $24,600 F Sales-volume variance $6,240 U Sales-mix variance $5,200 F Sales-quantity variance $1,040 U Sales-volume variance $27,600 U Sales-mix variance $11,500 F Sales-quantity variance $16,100 U Sales-volume variance $7,200 F Sales-mix variance $18,000 F Sales-quantity variance $25,200 F Sales-volume variance Sales-Quantity Variance $47,000 F Sales-Mix Variance $6,120 F Market-Share Variance $56,400 F Market-Size Variance $9,400 U Sales-Volume Variance $53,120 F  EMBED Word.Document.8 \s  Sales-mix variance Sales-quantity variance Sales-volume variance _`PQ % 3 4 8 KO'F01GHPQmnOJQJCJCJ jCJUOJQJ 56CJ6CJCJ5CJCJ5CJR 4Z[<l/HY ! 3 4 $ #$$ & F*$0 $ $ $ 4Z[<l/HY ! 3 4 J'PQ()GHjk ?@PQlmn R#c## !* _ J'$ $ $ * $_  $Z  $X $$ J#$ PQ()GHjk$h$!$$P40@$$$ $ $  ! !  ?@PQlmn$ !$$P40@$$$ $h$n R#c#d#v&w&&&&&&&$$$$$ $d H($d *P"$d @ P"$ @$ @! !@$ @$#  S#X#d#v&|&}&&&&&&&&&& ' ''O'P'_'l''''''''''''''''(((('()(O(P(Q(^(`(a(d(e(k(l(o(p(v(w(z({((((((((())c)d)s))))) j,CJCJmH>*CJ >*OJQJ>*CJjCJUmH5CJOJQJ5CJ5CJ CJ OJQJNc#d#v&w&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& ' ''''3'A'B'O'P'_'l'w'''''''''''''''''''''(((((((((((("(#($(%(&('((()(/(:(D(E(O(P(^(i(t((((((((((((((( )!   ^&&&&&&&&&& ' ''''3'A'B'O'P'_'l'w''''' !$ !$$$$l$$$$$'''''''''''''''''(((((((((($$l$!$ !$$((("(#($(%(&('((()(/(:(D(E(O(P(^(i(t(((((($$$$$$$$$$l$$$(((((((((( ) )))-):)G)T)U)c)d)s)))( P !x$ !$$l$$x$$$l$$$ ) )))-):)G)T)U)c)d)s)))))))))))))***,*-*.*/*0*1*7*B*I*J*T*U*^*j*w**************+++++8+F+T+b+c+p+q+++++++++++++++,,,,,,B,C,D,E,F,Q,%   !!  \)))))))))))***,*-*.*/*0*1* $$l4 6$$$! ! $$$l$$$!$ !$$l $$x$)**/*1*T*U*V*****++++8+F+p++++++++, ,,,,B,C,D,F,q,r,s,,,---T-U-V-\------M.f./>/?/@///11<35556 6'6)6*6/6364696:6 5>*CJCJ jUmH5>*CJ >*OJQJ >*OJQJ>*CJjCJUmHCJ 5OJQJOJQJ5CJK1*7*B*I*J*T*U*^*j*w**************+  !H$ !$H$$$$$l 6$$$$+++++8+F+T+b+c+p+q++++++++++++++H< $H$ !H$ !$$l 6$$$!$ !++,,,,,,B,C,D,E,F,Q,\,f,g,q,r,$$$l $$$$$$$l4 $ %d$ H$$$$$l 6$$$Q,\,f,g,q,r,,,,,,,,,,,,,-----;-H-I-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z-[-\------------------...%.2.>.?.L.M.f.t.......//%/,/7/>/?/M/T/_/g/h/t/z///////////11  !   ]r,,,,,,,,,,,,,-----,<!$ !N$$lֈ $$$l; $$$--;-H-I-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z-[-\---------$$$$$$l4 $$$$$$x$ !x$ !$$l $$$----------...%.2.>.?.L.$,$$$$l $$$$$L.M.f.t.......//%/,/7/>/<$$ & F$  $$l $$$!$ !N$$lVֈ $>/?/M/T/_/g/h/t/z///////////11<3=3"d$h$$H$$Z$$$$$$$$$l H$1<3=355)6*6A6{66666!7"777^7~7778#8$8A8V8p88889X999:;;2<D<E<F<G<P<Y<Z<[<þ}x              #01'js!   H+ I",=355)6*6A6{66666!7"777y$ & F+   $ h  $ hd&vh$d%d&d'd(d h  #(-$  hjr<#(-$ hd$ :6A6{6%7)7*7/70777^77#8A8D8H8I8N8O8U8p8839?9@9K9L9W9`9j9k9u9v99;;;;<<2<D<E<[<d<<<<<)=/===c>BYBDDDDDEEEEEEEFGGGGGGGGG CJOJQJ j5CJ 5;CJ j-CJ5CJ>*CJ>*CJOJQJ5CJCJ 5OJQJ 5>*CJL77^7~7778#8$8A8V8p88xvvb! !! h d<#(-'h$d%d&d'd(d # h  ^ <#(-&$d%d&d'd(d  h  <#(-$  hjr<#(-$$d%d&d'd(d  jr<#(- 8889X999:;;2<D<E<F<G<P<Y<Z<[<d<j<k<$$$$$#x $ *p$ h d<#(-$  h d<#(-[<d<j<k<t<<<<<<<<<<==)=/=3=7=;=?=B=F=I=M=Q=V=Z=^=b=f=i=m=~ytoje`[V                                 !       -  ?  Q  e  u                !k<t<<<<<<<<<<==)=/=3=7=;=l$$  !$ !$  h  ^ <#(-$$7$$P4\ (#$$;=?=B=F=I=M=Q=V=Z=^=b=f=i=m=q=u=y=~==========$$ m=q=u=y=~===========+>c>?@BYBCCDDDDEEEEEEEE"E&Eþ{vqlgb                !"c{|B# /##                          $==+>c>?@BYBCCDDDDEEEEEE$$ $ $0#x 7$$P4\ (#EEE"E&E'E(E)E2E:E>EGEQEXE`EkE{E|EEEEEEE$$$$&E'E(E)E2E:E>EGEQEXE`EkE{E|EEEEEEEEEEFF FFF F'F+F8F?FEFþ|xsnid_Z                  $ $ ,  1  ;<  M  ^  k                                !EEEEFF FFF F'F+Fqj$ $$ $$P4T B$$$$$  $$ $$M$$P4ֈT B$ +F8F?FEFFFRFYF]FjFqFuFvFFFFFFFFFFFF $$ $ $$ $$$$P4T B$$$$EFFFRFYF]FjFqFuFvFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFG GGGG|wsnid_Z        !  *+  /  6  8  ;  B  NO  S  Z  g  k  r  ~                        "FFFFFFFFFFFG GGGGG G*G2G6G:G $$ T $$ $  $$ $$$$P4T B$$$GG G*G2G6G:GAGEGFGQGYG\GjGqGuGvGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGH|wrnkhd`\6 N O `ab  c  d  e  l  u  vw  {                                     #:GAGEGFGQGYG\GjGqGuGvGGGGGGGGGGGGT $  $$ $$  $$ T$$$$P4T B$$$GGGGGGGGHH~HHHHHHHHH$ <,$$$P4 Ht"$$&d #xx  $ *p$ $ $$P4T B$$$GGGGGGGGHCHDHIHJHMHNHVHXH}H~HHHHHIIIIJJJJJ@JAJBJlJJJJJKKKK+K4K5K>KOOOyRSSST)T,T-T.TLTMTOTPTQTdTeTj: UVmH jU jCJU CJOJQJ>*CJ>*CJjCJUmHOJQJ5 j-CJ jUmH 5;CJ5CJ5CJCJBHH~HHHHHHHHHHI.IOIdIIIIIIJ@JBJMJVJbJkJlJvJJJJJK?KK L\MZNOP#PpPP~{xr O$  -Fq          #-[n 0EFG  P  \  e  p  r# ,HHI.IOIdIIIIIIJ@JBJMJVJbJkJlJvJ$$P4 Ht"$$&d$$#xx H<# $ T4$ <,$vJJJJJK?KK L\MZNOP#Ps$ H<# $ H<#$#x H<#$x H<#$ & F$x H<#$x H<# $ T $ 8T4 $ 8T #PpPPyQQQyRSS(T)T,TTTTTTU$ @ D h$ %d H$ *# $0 H<# $ H<# $ H<#$h H<#PyQQQyRSS(T)T,TTTTTTU1U2U5UiUjUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU V)VGVHVIVJVKVLVXVvVVVVGWHWWWWWXXXXXXXX=Y>Y\YYYYYQ[R[c[d[{[[[[[[[[           !%#PeTfTgThTiTkTlTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTUU UU&U.U1U2U6U7UJUKULUMUQURUeUfUgUhUiUjUnUoUUUƼƸƳƬƠƬƋƳxjO: UVmHjCJEHUj(: CJUVmHjCJEHUj: CJUVmH jCJUOJQJ>*CJ>*CJ jCJCJ jEHUjZ: UVmH j jNEHUj9: UVmH j- jU jEHU/U1U2U5UiUjUUUUUUUUUUUU$$P4  @$$$&d H $$ H# $  ! !H $ H $  ! ! $ @ D hUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU V VV V!V"V)V*V=V>V?V@VXVYVlVmVnVoVvVwVVVVVGWIWWWWWWúڮڙڄ{jCJEHUj+: CJUVmHjCJEHUjԅ: CJUVmHjCJEHUj: CJUVmHjCJEHUj*: CJUVmH jCJU5CJCJOJQJ j EHUj: UVmH jU j EHU0UUUUU V)VGVHVIVJVKVLVXVvVVVVGWHWWWWW$$$dh$ $$ $$P4  @$ $$ HWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWXXXXXXXXXYY Y YY Y!Y"Y%Y&Y9Y:Y;YY?Y\Y]Y{j$!CJEHUjV@ UVmHjCJEHUjr: CJUVmH>*CJ>*CJOJQJjCJEHUj: CJUVmHjCJEHUj˨: CJUVmH jCJj/CJEHUj.: CJUVmHCJ jCJU0WXXXXXXXX=Y>Y\YYYYYQ[R[c[d[{[ $d H($ #  $  B$dh $ $  $  # ]YYYYYYQ[R[X[c[d[{[[[[\\*\+\y\z\\\\\]].]R]S]v]w]]]]]] ^%^;^b^c^^^^^^^^_)_B_G_N________``+```````aaAaBaeagaaaaa 5OJQJ>*jCJUmHCJEH 5;CJ5;5CJ5CJOJQJ>*CJ>*CJCJO{[[[[[[[[[\\*\B\R\V\W\g\y\\\\\\\]]*].]$$$$$$0&d[[\\*\B\R\V\W\g\y\\\\\\\]]*].]/]8]C]D][]g]h]]]]]]]]þ~ytoje`\W                    !  ,  56  :  J  b  w                      "  :  M  _  o  ".]/]8]C]D][]g]h]]]]]]]]<y $$ @ 7$$P4\,$$$$$7$$P4\,$]]^"^;^<^=^>^?^H^S^T^j^u^v^^^^^^^^^_*_C_D_E_F_G_W_c____Ŀzuqlgb]X                !  :  H  u                          %&  '  (  )  B  Q  ~  "]]^"^;^<^=^>^?^H^S^T^j^u^v^^^^^$$7$$P4\$$$$$$ $$ @ ,T$$ @ ,T^^^^^_*_C_D_E_F_4$$$$ @  $$ @ ,T$$ @ ,T $$ @ 7$$P4\,$$$ F_G_W_c____``,`-`.`Ǡv $$ 8\ %d$ H8p$$ 8$ T$$ 8$$ 8$ $$7$$P4\$$$$ _``,`-`.`/`0`1`2`3`4``````aaa@adaaaaaaaaaaaaaa½~ytojea\        ##          $  I  ]  c        01  2  3  4  56  7  8  V % d  ".`/`0`1`2`3`4``````axxi$$ $ $$ <T $7$$P4\$$$$$$7$$P4\$$$ aaa@adaaaaaaaaaaaaaa $$6 `$1$$#  $$P4$!$$P40$$$ $$  $$aaaaaaaaabb-b0b1b8bFbccccIdUdXdYddd*CJ 5>*CJ jCJCJ5CJOJQJhnH 5OJQJhnH  CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ 5OJQJOJQJIaaaabbbb-b.b/b0b1b2b3b4b5b6b7b8bFbGbHbIbJbUb`babbbmbxbybbbbzuplgb]                        ,-  .  /  01  2  3  45  6  7  HI  J  K  kl  m  n"aaaabbbb-b.b/b0b1b2b3b4b5b6b7b8bFbGbHbIbJbUb`babPD`` $$6 `$1$$abbbmbxbybbbbbbbbbbbbΐ $$6 `+$$6F`+$$6F`$1$$bbbbbbbbbbc!c,c-c.c/c0c1c2c3c4c5c6c7c8c9c:cCcJcKcLcWcbcccnc½zvqlgc^          !  *  +,  -  .  /0  1  2  34  5  6  78  C  N  mn  y          "bbc!c,c-c.c/c0c1c2c3c4c5c6c7c $$6 `$$6 `-$$6F`$1$$+$$6F`7c8c9c:cCcJcKcLcWcbcccncvc~cccccH`pp+$$6F`$1$$ $$6 `$1$$ncvc~cccccccccccccccccccccccdddd'd)d*d6dBdDdzuplgb]  "  .  :;  =  I  \]  _  j  }~                                  "cccccccccccccccT4 $$6 `$$6 `-$$6F`$1$$$1$$+$$6F`cccccdddd'd)d*d6dBdDdEdFdGdHdl#$$62`!$$62` $$6 `$1$$DdEdFdGdHdIdUdVdWdXdYdZd[d\dtdudvdwdxddddddddddddddddd½zvqlgc^                                                    "HdIdUdVdWdXdYdZd[d\dtdudvdwdxdddddddddddd<lHPP$1$$ $$6 `$1$$$$6 `dddddddddddddeeee+e5e7ed!$$62` $$6 `$1$$ddddddddeeee+e5e7e8e9e:e;e*CJ 5>*CJCJ0J.<>*CJCJjCJUmHLppqq&q9qQqaqbqtqqqqqqqqrr/r0r9$$P<4\,$$$$$qqqqqqqrr/r0r9r?rRrerxrrrrrrrr s%s&s's(s)s*s3s8s9sLsĿ{vrmhc^Y  Q  R  W  `  ab  c  d  e  ~     !           %  8  K  Q  Z[  k                !0r9r?rRrerxrrrrrrrr s$$ @ ,T $$ @ ,T!$ !@ ,T $$  J7$$P4\,$$$$$$ s%s&s's(s)s*s3s8s9sLs`sasxsssss !$ !$$$7$$P4\$$$$$$$$ @ ,TJ)s@sAsGsHs[s\s`saslsmssstsssssssssssssst t=tDt]ttttttNuOuTuUu^u_uuuu&v`vavvvvvvvv wwwww%w'w6wBwwwww]xtx}xxxxxxxxxxx5y>*CJ>*CJ 5>*CJ 5OJQJ5CJ5CJjCJUmHOJQJ jCJCJQLs`sasxsssssssst t9t:t;t sssst t9t:t;t*CJ>*CJOJQJ 5OJQJCJEH EH CJjCJEH UmHj5UmHFyyy-zfzzzz{/{0{o{ll` $ 2 ^z"$> 8hT~  :H^z<!$> 5hT~  :H^z # hT2 H$ ,hT2  :H^< # hT2 H^< o{{{|'|*|W|||_!$> 5hT~  ,:H^z<!$> 5hT$  :Hrlz & hT :H!$> 5hT2  :H^z<"$> 8hT2  :H^z<'|*|W||||}B}}}}~~~-/QHz`dAσЃ$%wx؄B}zwtq0Sy189TW  M!89ij "`a +||}B}}}}~~~-/Q~{~qq $  X $$dh$ $> 2T2  :H^z<"$> 8hT2  :H^z<$ $~ ,z!$> 5hT~  ,:H^z< Hz`dAσЃ$%w $ $ 1dh ^     jx$  j$  j$ $&d  X  $  X 78@AghnoŁƁρځ "U`cdeЃ%+,56\]txy{ABԻ OJQJmHjOJQJUmH5CJ 5>*CJ>*CJCJ5CJjCJUmH>*CJCJmH>*CJ@<CJ jCJCJFwx؄B:uv̆͆$0 pr   r@ $0 pr%d H$ $ FV^ $ F$ $ :uv̆͆Tȇ݉ %j+Yhſѧ|yvspkf2J2Y H! x y!  > 1 2 A b j .Ltu L%O&:>͆ІцTX݉ imϊЊ&'‹Ëċŋ̋΋ڋۋ+-CJH* j j55CJ5 OJQJmHjOJQJUmHjCJUmHOJQJ5CJ jUmHCJ 5OJQJH͆Tȇ~{$Z$d%d&d'd(d :l !$$d%d&d'd(d :l$d%d&d'd(d :l$0 pr0  $0 p  ݉ %jz $dh pd pd $ pd&d ! !$d%d&d'd(d P$$d%d&d'd(d! !$$ @$d%d&d'd(d  l+Yh֌!ɍʍb^9:$ $ & F,$0$ $ *$   $   $ 2dh d $dh j-YZ֌׌!"ɍʍύЍٍڍ܍eal*!9:˕;Rc #$+4<=FGNU]^fgnu}~g >*CJ>*CJ 5;CJOJQJCJ>*CJ55CJCJ5CJCJH*jCJUmHCJO֌!ɍʍb^9:a˕:;R`abcmv}xsnj            '  2  <  E  O  P  Q  R`wx#,Qxy  , TP31':a˕:;R`abcmv$$$Z&d# $̖ݖ $,$$ $$  $$c$$P4ִX X X D $̖ݖ $,34=GNTU^gntu~þ}xsnid_Z        #  +  4  =  >  D  K  T  ]  ^  d  k  u  ~                                !,34=GNTU^gntu~$$$$ $$  $$ ɗҗܗ!7MNgq՘|wrmhc^Y                      ,  -  A  K  d  e  {                            "ɗҗܗ$$$c$$P4ִX X X D $!7MNgq՘,$$$$X$$P4֞X X X : #+,-39:;<CIJKQZ[aghipvwx$$ $$  $$#+,-39:;<CIJKQZ[aghipvwxyþ}xsnid_Z      "  )  *  +  2  9  :  ;  <  B  I  J  K  Q  W  X  a  g  h  i  o  v  w  x  y            !xyřƙǙ͙֙יݙ$$ l$$ $$  řƙǙ͙֙יݙ þ}xsnie`[                                                              ! X$$P4֞X X X :  $$ l$$ l $$ l!*4?HQX_`fgpc$$P4ִ< < < 0 $$$ $d H(!*4?HQX_`fgpŚܚ '.2ÿ~ytoje`[                                    2  B  KL  R  S  Z  a  j  s  ~          !pŚܚ '.269FRY_c$$ $$ $$  $$&69EFQRYhst~ɛӛԛܛ@Almr)*]rsxy§ѧا !"+-hjkl5CJ 5OJQJ jUmH5CJ6CJ5CJ>*CJOJQJ>*CJCJS269FRY_cfhtśɛԛݛޛߛA455l|yvspmjgda\./}}~q                      "  &  ,  3  >  J  L  O  S  Y  `  l  y  |  $cfhtśɛԛݛ$$ $$  ݛޛߛA455lm|un$ h$  $d h$ h$ $c$$P4ִ< < < 0 $ lm#$_`r `bvӦԦTUh|ѧҧhk˨ľ|vsp :&:MN,@B S*+EF+m#$_`r$0  V @@@@@@$0   l< !@@@@ $  N HB.@@@@@$ $ $ h$ `bvӦnnZ$0 h V@@@@@@@@$ h V@@@@@@@@$0 h V@@@@@@@@$0 # h V<6$@@@@@@@@$ h V.@@@@@@@@$  V.@@@@@@@$  V.@@@@@@!0$d%d&d'd(d  VJ@@@@@@ ӦԦTUh|ѧҧl$ # T  :^<$0  h V<@@@@@@@@$0  h V@@@@@@@@@$0  h VP@@@@@@@@@$0 h V@@@@@@@@$0 h VP@@@@@@@@$0 h V@@@@@@@@ hk˨!@ݩl$ ) hT  :<@$ ) hT  :<@$ ) hT  :@$ & hT  :^<@$ d$ # T  :^< ¨ѨҨ./=>LMZ[^ijvw.9:EGRS^q}~!"*+2bop}~ĬŬЬѬܬݬ!"34FGYZlmïدٯ5CJjCJUmH5H*>*CJ>*CJCJCJH*X˨!@ݩ_êժ(6~۫3S!3FYlڭ!ɮ\]xurok }'  '   ' J&   & %8J\o8~5C Yz+JS*_êժ(6~n$ /hT  r^<@$ 2hT  r^<@$ ) hT  :<@$ ,hT2  :<@$ ) hT:.<@۫3S!{]]]]$ /hT  r^<@$ 2hT  r^.<@!$h 2hT  r^<@ $h /hT  r^<@!$h 2hT  r^.<@ !3FYlڭ!ɮ\$ ,T  r^<#$ & F'8 /8T  r^< $ & F& ,hT  r^<@$ /hT  r^<@\]¯ïįůƯ$ px$$ /hT  r^<$ ,T  r^<¯ïįůƯǯȯɯʯ˯̯ͯίϯЯѯүӯ #~zun  O  PQ  R  S  T  U  ^  ab )Ưǯȯɯʯ˯̯ͯίϯЯѯүӯ $$ $ hH$$$ x$$ x$$ px$ٯ #0HI~%)3;DFQYbdow89ijkwx ()23;>?AHI jEH>*CJCJH*>*CJCJEH5CJOJQJCJ5CJCJT#')+0X$$ $ hH$$$ x$M$$P4ֈ\ $$$$$#')+01JR[dmuvְ&3;EQYcow{vqlgb]X            &  0  8  E  N  U  t                            !  :;  @  B  D  H"01JR[dmuv$$P4\ d, $ $$ $$ x$M$$P4ֈ\ d, $ְ&3;EQYcowƴ$$P4\ d, $ $$  $$ $$ x$ű˱ѱױر!'(:@FMTZ[k|wrmhc_Z        %  +  1  CD  J  N  R  V  Z  mn  r  v  z  ~                        "ű˱ѱױر!'(:@FϘϨ$$P4\ d, $ $$ $h$ x$FMTZ[kx˲ֲ PH$$ x$$$ x$$h$ x$$$P4\ d, $ $$ kx˲ֲ )3=>?nƳ$^y۷ !9Q}zwtqnkhe2Jax G]y,-.  8  B  L  V  _                        ' )3=>?nƳ$^y$$ x$$ lx|$$ px|$$ x$$$P4\ d, $ $$ ImowxƳdz̳ͳ$%)*/0:;DENOXY^_fgȷɷڷQRW ɻλۻ-.Z[cqɼʼμϼ()-.>*CJ jCJOJQJ55CJ5CJ 5>*CJCJ jEHUy۷ !9Qb κɻλۻ$ $ $ # p  :^<$$ $  $  $ $Qb κɻλۻܻݻ޻ 56CDbcqr~ytokfa                '(  5  6  TU  b  c              ` $ۻܻݻ޻ 56CDbcqr0H$$Tl  $$Լռ 34CDXYZ[rs½ѽҽzuqlgb^                        '(  7  8  OP  _  `  vw  x  y          "Լռ 34CDXYZ[rsD\$$Tl  $$.ghlm½ѽ #$%&+67FGHST^_cdkl̾پwx|}ٿ 0156=>FSde jOJQJ5CJ5>*CJ>*CJ jCJCJX½ѽҽ !"#$%67FGHIRS0$$$$$$Tl  ҽ !"#$%67FGHIRSTUst˾{vrmhc_Z                          "#  $  %  45FG  H  I  JK  W  X  lm  z  {  #STUst˾̾پھ$%H$$$$Tl  $$˾̾پھ$%DESThijkؿٿzuplgb]  o  p                            &  '  FG  T  U            "%DESThijkؿٿ \$$Tl  $$Tl  $$ EFSTcdef &'67K{vrmhc_Z  45  D  E  `a  q  r                      %  &  LM  N  O  ^_  `  a  bc" EFSTcdefHH$  h  ^ <#(-$$Tl  $$$$TlM  $$$Tl  $$ &'67KLZ[\]^_jkl8$$$TlM  $$$$Tl  $$ '6LZ]^_jkm2AQ%Th )89;<OPj>: CJUVmHj#CJEHUjo: CJUVmH jCJU jCJ 5>*CJ5CJ 5OJQJ>*OJQJ>*CJ>*CJ jCJCJBKLZ[\]^_jklm 2QR½}xsnid_[  9  M  N  ]  ^  m  n  ~                                    !lm 2Q$$$$$$$$$$Tl l $QRWXfguv}$$Tl  r<R&$$e$$Tl4ִ rR&RWXfguv $%45Ŀzuplgb]X  7  F  G  RS  ^  _  n  o  ~                                            " $%45DETU`  $$Tl  r<R&$$5DETU`aghuvĿ|wrmid_  d  pq                                           &  '  6#`aghuv|$$Tl   $$$$$Tl  r<R&$$$$Tl  r<R&()89:PabmnpÀ$$Tl H $ & F$$$$Tl   $$$$()89:PabmnST}yvspmjb_\$  RS                              1$  23  B  C  TU  c$nST4$ $ & F$$h$$Tl H $$PQR 9;<GHX[jkl/89BCLMWeopz{(3[CJ5>*CJ 5OJQJj5OJQJUmHOJQJ 5>*CJ5CJ5CJCJ jCJUj4&CJEHUJ 9kXssss$  N \ d^Jf!$$d%d&d'd(d   N $   $  <$  f!$ ~ f!$ h$$h  9kX(3[OP`adeľzsnje`              ;  q  r  uv  V #  #g uJ{|%(3[r\\$ # hN j^Jf! 5    <#(- hN j^Jf!# " hN j^Jf!($d%d&d'd(d hN j^Jf!$ hN \ d^Jf! 1 h   <#(- N \ d^Jf!%./89CDNPVd-hij  !+hqr{'24?amnoqr (/G5CJOJQJ 5OJQJjCJUmH55CJ>*CJ>*CJCJUOP`ademmh$$$$  h  ^ <#(-$$ $ j $ ~   $ ~ $ ,h8N \ j^Jf! 8    <#(- h8N j^Jf!$ & h8N j^Jf! "-;FLT[h !$$ !$$li4 x "4$$$$  h  ^ <#(-$$$$li4x4"-;FLT[hix !,-=Qþzupkfb]X                   !  !        &  /  8  A  L  ^ / mn  {           !  !    hix$$$$/$d$$lxִx W"),.4  !,$$!$ !d$$lִx W"),.4 ,-=Q]hr|$$$$d$$lִx W"),.4 Q]hr|'234?@ABManopĿzuqlgb]X  g  h  u                                        *  89  D  O  Z  d  n  y  "'2t$$$$d$$lZִx W"),.4234?@ABManopqrstu$$d$$lZִx W"),.4$$pqrstu "(/8BGN[fkĿ{vqjc\W  p  {                      9: ;<=  >  ?  @  A  B  C  P  ab  c  d  e  f!u$ *$d$$lZִx W"),.4$$$$ "(/8BGN[fkrx $+$  $$$ $$ $$$ $  $d H(GZ[f0JKLQhij : 9:<@WXZ $%8pz| !<DWa jUmH 5OJQJjCJUmH jCJ>*CJ>*CJjOJQJUmHCJ5CJOJQJNkrx&*-09xsoje`[V             !        !  !                   +  2  :  G   N  T  ^  d  k ~ulc$$  $$ 2$$ f$$ $$ ?Y$$Tl֞z0 $$ $$  ypg^ !$ !$$  $$ 2$$ f !$ ! !$ !?Y$$Tl֞q0$$  $$  &*-09GLMNypgx^$$ $$  $$ $$  $$ 2$$ f$$ $$ ?Y$$Tl֞z0 9GLMNOPQYejk $-:EJSYcijs|wrmhc^YT  /  0  6  @  F  O  T  _  l  u  z                 kl  q  }               NOPQYejkwsja$$$$x $ [$$Tlu֞z0$$  $$ $$  $$   $-:EJSYcijs$ $$ $$s '5;<=>Ŀ|wrmhd_Z  \  ]^  d  r  {  ~       !  !                                     &!SY$$Tl֞|1_!'$$ $$ $$  $$ 2$$ f$$ ?$$Tl&|1_!'  oY$$Tl֞|1_!' !$$ !!$ !$$  $$ 2$$ f$$ ? '5;<=>?@HTYx}$$$$ Y$$Tl֞|1_!'$$ $$ $$   >?@HTYZ 89AHIfĽ~ytmid_ZU  P  Q  X  `a  ~                                  ?@  E  Q  Y  Z  [!YZx$$ $ $$ $$$|$[$$Tll֞|1_!'  89Atk$$ ?-$$l4H  $$$ $$  $  h  ^ <#(-?-$$lJ d $$  AHIfgpyzPz/$$l4H  $$ $$ ?-$$l4H  $$$ $$  fgpyz+,4;<Wž~ytpkfaZ  D  E  L  TU  p  q  x                                       )  23!+$ $$ $$  $$ ?-$$lJ d$$ $$ $$+,4;<WXajkѰѼL$$$$$ $ $ $$ $$  $$ ?-$$l4H WXajke23G g{|6zwrmjgdJ!%m#!t!!9MN!~!!!ij                  ()&aq/0|}%/23JK^_¹jX: CJUVmH >*OJQJ >*OJQJ j-OJQJOJQJjm-CJEHUj: CJUVmHj+CJEHUjm: CJUVmH j-CJj(CJEHUjᥫ: CJUVmH jCJU5CJ>*CJCJ>*CJ.e23G|s$ 8@@ !x !8@@!0x !8@@!x !8@@ ! !8@@$ 8@ $ 8@ $ T$/$$lwJ d _`adexyz{|}~ 89*+,-./0Cż찧좚}j8CJEHUjI: CJUVmH>*CJ>*CJ j-OJQJOJQJjg6CJEHUj: CJUVmHj4CJEHUj(: CJUVmH j-CJj1CJEHUj: CJUVmHCJ jCJUj/CJEHU.G g{|6$dh$ 8@@ %d H8@ # 8@@ ! !8@@ $x 8@@ !x !8@@! !8@$ 8@CDEFIJ]^_`cdwxyz{NO zzzzz j55 OJQJmHjOJQJUmHCJ5CJ>*CJ>*CJ j-CJ j-OJQJOJQJ jw?EHUj: UVmH jUjc=CJEHUj: CJUVmHCJ jCJUj:CJEHUjh: CJUVmH0 .a%W\wJ,-6'"L]^~vsphe`#"  #4  ^  m  Y  J    3S1T1622 $)[Rt%v!!$ .a%W\wJ,1$ B 2dh B $dh H 2dh H$`dh0 * $&d  X  $  X %dh H$ UWhiop>?FGlmst|0;kwxJLMR]^5CJ CJOJQJ j-CJCJjCJUmH>*CJ jUmH@<>*CJ jCJCJ5 j5K,-6'"L]^:;@$ $p p$ p# $h $ & F h $h  $ & F  $ & F 31;=!:@BIJTqr +-.ABCDEGHJKL_`abefghi|}~ jCJ jEEHUjyʹ: UVmH jOJQJ CJOJQJ jCEHUjʹ: UVmHCJ jAEHUjɹ: UVmH jU jCJ55CJCJ5CJOJQJOJQJ::;@ABIJTU_`hiqr*+,-Ŀ{wtqnkhc^  T  UV                            !  +,  6  7  >  ?  @EFa#$@ABIJTU_`hiqrt$$l* &A$$lr* &$$$$$$*+,-EFGHJKcdef`!$ ! $h $$h$$$$l* &-EFGHJKcdefhĿ}xsnid_X !                                  !  !       5  6  8  9  :  ;  S!fhԀD$h$$$$l4 T%$$lTj,%$$!$ ! )*+,/1EFLMVXbcijsu&23E j555CJ jOJQJ j2MEHUj`.: UVmH jJEHUjV̹: UVmHCJ jHEHUj̹: UVmH jUOJQJ jCJCJ@-./1VWXZstuw%&=?[Jþ|ytolifc6y22%Ai%CZ[         &  (  )*  O  Q  RS  k  m  n  o    &-./1VWXZstuwtD$h$$Tl4 rF $$Tl4 rF $$$$$$Tlr>F $$%&=?[J$dh 2dh d $dh j $dh pd pd $ pd%dh H&d$$ EFXY ?@A[]JKľܬܲܥ jCJU 5>*CJ5CJ5>*OJQJ 5OJQJ >*OJQJj>*OJQJUmHOJQJCJjCJUmHCJ jUmHH* j5 j5<'()*+HIJ<=q#C{Smn½#!  }+  ~              !<sl/$$lV0T. $$ 8@@&$$l4T. $$ 8@@$$ 8@@$ 8@@$! ! ~r~ $$lX !$ !8@@ !$ !. C$$lX $$ 8@@ $ & F+ 8@@$ 8@@$ 8@@-$$l0T. '()*+HIJKQZ]qr!"fg{=>HPcjn'()*>*CJ>*CJ j jCJ5CJ >*OJQJOJQJCJ jCJUjOCJEHUj: CJUVmHK'()*+HIJ<=qۼ$ $ *$ 8@@ $$l4X $$lX !$ !8@@q#C{Smn+f$  t  $ # $  * h  ^ <#(- t P$  t P $x $dh*+RSTUVWIJPQ78UVZ[ST]^uOPYZdmLT 5>*CJ5CJ j>*CJ>*CJ jCJCJ jCJUV+f74u1q%>Wm/G`y2CD[:>?Pav#234KWXo{| b74u1q $@  $ @  $ $ * ' h  ^ <#(- t  $  t  $ $dh$ $  t d%>Wm/G`y $$P4@$ $$ , $$ ,$$  $$ hx $$ h$ $@ Tcjtu $,./FG28CDZ[CDghFG`ag<=OJQJ CJOJQJEH jUmH5 5;CJ 5;CJ>*CJ5CJ 5>*CJj[: CJUV j$*CJU>*CJCJH2CD[:>?Pav$$$$$&d$$ *$ #234KWXo{|$$7$$P4\,$$$Ǩo\7$$P4\$$$$$$$$ @ ,T $$ @ 7$$P4\,$   '67Q`a 89:;<=>?@3_6 P Q R S T U V W h y         + / > Q b w             !  a  '67Q`a$$ @  $$ @ $$P4 ,$$$$$ @7$$P4\+$$$$$9$$P4\$$$$89:;<=>?@3$$$$  $$  $  $$  ! !$ * $$P4$$$ @ $$ @ ,T $$ @ 45`aO Q W      ! " ; > W Y Z             # 4 5 > ? H J U V Y Z             9=5CJOJQJEHEH OJQJmHjOJQJUmH jUmH5 5;CJ5CJCJEHN3_6 P Q R S T U V W h y     $$$$$$&d $$P4@$$$ h$$ Xp     + / > Q b w             , : X$$$$P4 ,$$$ , : ; W Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c l z {                  J V W X Y Z [       7 q s t      89Z -5=CMU[\ '12;HOP_n%   `: ; W Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b Ǡ$$$$ @ $$ @ ,T$d$ H(@  $$ @ 7$$P4\,$ b c l z {           Xy $$ @ 7$$P4\,$$$$$7$$P4\$$$$        J V W X Y Z [   $$x$$P4$%d$ H@ ,T $$ @ $$P4$$$ *$$ @ ,T%d$ H@      7 q s t      89Z$$ l\  $$ X $$ |$$$$ Xp $$ Xp `x $$   -5=Cp $$   $$ ,$$P4F 4$$$$$ $ @$ $$P4$CMU[\ '12;H$$$$$$,$$P4F 4 $$  $$ OYZ]^qrst}~   -.01deCDFGyzHI^_vw!½½½½½½ j55OJQJ jCJUj'SEHUmHj残@ CJUVmH jUmH jU>*CJ>*CJ5CJCJJHOP_nv( $$  $$ $$7$$P4\ 8$$nv}f{!pM6cik=>GWmnt{  #2* ^}f{$ $  *7$$P4\ 8 $$ !pM6cik$ 2dh d $dh j $dh pd pd $ pd$dh&d$!*+1234:;DEJKLMST_`efghnopsMN7chijklmrs=>m  SWZ^CJ>*CJ>*CJ5CJCJOJQJ5CJOJQJCJjCJUmHCJ jUmHH* jNk=>GWmnt{ $$ T$$ T$$,$$P4Fp$$$$ # p $$,$$P4Fp$$$# $,$$P4Fp$ $h$ $ @ )@X_` $  # ,$$P4Fp$ $h$ $ @ $$ T$$)@X_`0[>?{( d    4!!!! ""l## $Z$$$'''-(.(/(0(1(G(Z(m(~((((((((((2)G)X)\)]))))))*"*D*f*******+&+'+(+++=+i+u++++H,,*---$%# \^`VWZ[>?@xy{|& ' ) * b c e f      !!!!!!" """""""8#9#;#<#O#P#Q#R#T#U#h#i#j#k#l#$5 jVWEHUj,: UVmH jUEHUjs,: UVmH5CJ5CJ jCJU>*CJ>*CJ jUCJOJQJCJG0[>?{( d    $ @(#$$P4 LTB% $V$ $$$$$$ $   $   $ h  ^ <#(-  4!!!! ""l## $Z$$$''} %d H $ !$ ( @ H!$ ( @ H! $L  #( $( @(# $ (#$ @(#$$$$$$''-(.(/(Z([(m(o(((((2)4)G)I)\)])^)k)m)r)t))))))))))))))))** ***)*+*0*2*K*M*R*T*m*o*t*v*******************+++>*CJ>*CJCJ jUmH5>* ;OJQJ CJOJQJ>*CJCJ>*CJR''-(.(/(0(1(G(Z(m(~((((((((((2)G)X)\)$$ ,$$$ ,$$ ,$$&d\)]))))))*"*D*f*******,$$ t  $$ l  $$ P $$ ,$$$  $$ 87$$P4\,$+ ++++%+&+=+>+i+u++++++++4,G,H,,*-+-d-e-g-h------->.E.o.u....../[/\/`/a/y/z/{/00H0N0Q0R0j00001112 21282222233 3>*>*5CJ jU>*CJ>*CJ jCJU CJOJQJCJ5CJ5OJQJ jUmH>*CJ>*CJCJJ*+&+'+(+++=+i+u++++tj $ $"$dx H($" $ 4p" $$  4p" $  4p"7$$P4\,$$$ t  $$ v  $$ P  +H,,*---.H.x..{///0Q0R0 $ p d $   $ h  ^ <#(-  $   $  $  $$ %d H$ *-.H.x..{///0Q0R0j00000000111111&181<1L1]1p1111111111292U2o22222 333)3Z3e3333l44+556M6N666O7~77)9{99+:[:=@@+@o@@@@@@@@@@@@@AA%#$$  \R0j00000000111111&181<1L1]1p1111$$ ,$$$ ,$$ ,$$&d1111111292U2o22222 3 $$ $ ,$ $$ P$ ,$ $$ P  $$$ Pt ,$ $$ Pt ,$$$ ,$7$$P4\T$ 3333)3Z3[3e33333344(5)5+5,555556666K6L6M6N666F7L7u7{7~7773848687888888888'9(9)9{99!:(:O:X:Z:[:@@ @@@+@@@@@ľ辸>* ;OJQJ 5;CJ5; CJOJQJ jCJU>*CJ>*CJCJ jCJUCJ5CJ5OJQJ jUmH>*H 333)3Z3e3333l44+55ypii$$ #xx #x $$  $$x  $x (# $$x  $x <(#9$$PV4\T$$$ $  56M6N666O7~77)9{99+:yl $ X # % h  ^ <(-X #%dx HX # $Lx  X #x X $x p X $ X   h  ^ <#(-X #x X $$P4 r0%$$ +:[:=@@+@o@@@@@@@@@@@@@AA$$ ,$$$ ,$$ ,$$ H(#$ H(##x  $x X #@@@@AA*A,AAAAAAAAAAAABB B B.B0B5B7B@BHBIBPBRB[B]BbBdB}BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB CCCCC'C(C/C1C@CkClCCCCCDMDZIaI{LPkPlPrPtPPPP5CJ 5CJCJ5CJOJQJ>*CJ>*CJCJ jUmH5UA*A*CJ>*CJCJEH5CJCJCJYPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP(| $$ $h$$$P4P$ $$&d$$B$$P4r$$$$ $$&dPQQQQQQ!Q%Q&Q-Q1Q2QCQLQTQZQbQcQnQ$h$B$$P4rP$ $$ nQvQ}QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ $h$$$B$$P4rP$ $$ QQQQRRR R RR"R%R(R+R.R/RCRNRVR\RdReRkRtR{RRRRRRRRRRRS1SNSaSuS=T>T?TBTMTWTdTnToTxT}TTTTTTTTTTTU0U\U]UcUxUUUUUUUUUUV%V&V:VuVvVVVVVVVVWXXXEYYYYrZ[ bQQQRRR R RR"R%R(R+R.R/RCRNRVR\RdR$h$B$$P4rP$ $$ dReRkRtR{RRRRRRRRRRRS1SNSaS$$$ $$ $$B$$P4rP$aSuS=T>T?TBTMTWTdTnToTxT}TTTTTT $h$$h$$h$,$$P4F p$$$$$$$$TTTTTTU0U\U]UcUxUUUUUUUUUUV$h$$$,$$P4F p$ $h$V%V&V:VuVvVVVVVVVVWXXXEYYYYrZ$$$,$$P4F p$ $h$VVWXEYYrZ6\\O]n^____.`2`Z`[```````` c cdddddiWiXiiiIjJjjj/[>*B*CJU >*B*CJj>*B*CJU0J+CJj.ZCJUCJCJmH 5mH mH >*CJ 0J4CJH* 0J4B*CJj{YCJU jCJU 0J45CJ0J4CJ CJOJQJ5CJ7rZ[[[[6\\6]7]O]n^!____>bddddbdddd?*"/<>?CJOJQJCJ  !"/<=>?$  # 0/R / =!"8#$%#0/R = /!"#$8% /R / =!"8#$%.0&P0P/R = /!"8#$%. 00&PP/R / =!"8#$%`! pC0.34)w A xZMl%ES?I?rr%[?+y$% PQ7r,H[XvX\*@{)P H4>%c#jucA !iQC60|h{jl# 57;$};;ߛhЫIBz@awrYB" d/=;ES ?$Z0M~zEq'J=OVW%\(].UvQ:B 0+߽prYmDne<{bxiC(/D}aCN< G˩fô}w9{/y`}w}4;0ה'- kI8~2_ S"mmו܂QXJ^@2LGN >}ڳl;~ "Ζrň<z$9NRrWK<`Q-2ɢU awGS-0x_ ZX3u훏xlnwth=rs` b\߼R+W\k|͘V1uJh^Khn1^׾$"GLV?,U9(C'pըar4nPgK?,UWaбbC*4V!Bb[)! aywz +M^ó Z髏sveui %TH4+aDOoG4g:q7=Ěϵ+KҊVoa,Eg9=W9X(|NڕR(W/͏Clu_>ahDhTOi{I4T(g1?w膞vMZ~k|. ć^:#~=^?W5br5JlAYq"cm0eiX-ծh]UT2k (BbR+LüyKZ2(Zfayi F|tk<4YػFػ6g9YUbZ qjU޴z,Vy%#Yc8w((ۙvPݝA鰵qLt_F?2<5H3k. }-zJ|3s(]]oGyxZOEN HGwh$JsyyVURFwc#COh3V]39J-Xy-具Ā:-*%ѴAv;M*ٯ}m6vV~{DZ7ߪrn&׽߾ip}3 ,YYY:[(qeܜ"ϵz=]_w>Z1n5 1cX/ a^ +ċvX~=dXb,M圪B%%?uNX JtlEqbpU ߊeV[i>ugLsUecxgB}4#geNOuvӪ cgpwZ-4,w߻(n]EA C?^&8*Nlmگ1积( P*'V+l5>;-wf)0gchͳꖣNԁZľl)>LO~[c 3:6z*н=fhdjSOcM6·zV99L^LmݣOl=V  d|}p[c  vb+݌ ;Ư][/~۟~͕1c_ FߒP1L^.>~/hS|>}hq"bf?vQb]Y|.o8jG?{mA60! $!D!n0v4]"{% lB")@ȟ/a-';ӽt<bs~-c}9WpFHG~;(y=Y}gNDdXB  S A? 2!yj*oL{Dn`!!yj*oL{4 (ZxmQN0}vڴ1T  H02R R(VG0k !6$u`!  zyF1ʠmֳO~3:tJц>*JCWR#ZSLcc:lT:TŧߦܑwXIzbo5ԫ<}ˉ zX>v|f~0Ryh jGO)tܷh YfkW0c9D6Qm}4(1Xe~Y ̄07hdފq>,Re 7 L=2 \}MDdXB  S A? 2+PP,n`!+PP,4 (YxmQK@~wiSs-X8DAAgu]z@*Nn88qDN/GxNpX4x"ΘAWUEh-K yAmE^"g*z:g5~S3p p|"'c%O\pEߖE<_UyI,vUCTDϸh{sGg/-ۗQ!7ڔ)?彭E{K Ab-Bi6=hpAX~6UwPи3fQDdXB  S A? 2UJ{8 n`!UJ{8D  7d]xmQJPI4IѠ"" ?-')} 7ߠBA\D7AxMn]p;} ؀Q )٤ #Ai*%r6[wQ&0qXF*10 \`al@VnkD".R>UEFX-cxnL"x4VSq8NNU #e8ytt /sO^;?8O8m;XKPgqI#7#K$$e!$|:mIF3&1oIApKҽ;'udT m?2Dd  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~     }!F"#%$&'()*,+-./1023465789;:<=>?@ABCDGEHkIJKLNMOPQRSUTVWXYZ\[]^_a`bcdefhgjilnmoprqstu~wxyz{|}Root Entry F#@1~ TData fWordDocumentObjectPool1{~_984318991F{{Ole CompObjfObjInfo  #$'*+.147:=@CFILOPQRSVYZ]`adghknopqrstwz{~ FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:hjl}    Actual salesquantity in units(Equation Native _984319033 F{{Ole CompObj f FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:\  Budgeted salesquantity in units) FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS EqObjInfo Equation Native  _984319066F{{Ole CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native _984319116 "F{{uation Equation.39q:Pz Budgeted contribution     margin per ticket FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS EqOle CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native uation Equation.39q:Z$P Budgeted averagecontribution margin per unit FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Eq_986621736;F{{Ole CompObjfObjInfo!uation Equation.39qZ+D (4,000  $20) + (6,000  $5)10,000 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qEquation Native "_984319311F{{Ole %CompObj &fObjInfo!(Equation Native )_984319377,$F{{Ole ,:n|} $80,000 + $30,00010,000 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qCompObj#%-fObjInfo&/Equation Native 0f_985410281@)FBB:Jgm $110,00010,000 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q}>@l 4,00010,000Ole 2CompObj(*3fObjInfo+5Equation Native 6Z_984319418.FBBOle 8CompObj-/9fObjInfo0; FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:>P\J 3,30011,000 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS EqEquation Native <Z_9843194443FBBOle >CompObj24?fuation Equation.39q:>|} 6,00010,000 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qObjInfo5AEquation Native BZ_9854103308FBBOle DCompObj79EfObjInfo:GEquation Native HZ_986621998=F@ԥ`u}>H1 # 7,70011,000 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qZAsKfObjInfo?MEquation Native N]ticketssold("Budgeted unitsof all ticketssold) FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q_986622155JBF`u`uOle TCompObjACUfObjInfoDWEquation Native X_986622196GF`u`uOle [CompObjFH\fZbl Budgetedsales-mixpercentage FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qZ\|m BudgeObjInfoI^Equation Native __986624882EOLF`u`uOle btedcont. marginper ticket FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qZX|< Actual unitsof all tCompObjKMcfObjInfoNeEquation Native f_1079439305QF`u`uicketssold FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qݸ8yII Actual sales-mix percentage("Ole iCompObjPRjfObjInfoSlEquation Native mBudgeted sales-mix percentage)Budgetedcont. marginper ticket FMicrosoft Equation 2.0 DS Equation Equation.29q_985296772VF`u`uOle uCompObjUWvfObjInfoXxpJTJXzJ $262,194,0001,459,700=$179.62 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qEquation Native y_985415320[F`u`uOle |CompObjZ\}fObjInfo]Equation Native _984327649`F`u`uOle }hD $115,088,5001,459,700=$78.84 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:uZ ActuaCompObj_afObjInfobEquation Native _984327789^reF`u l sales   quantity   in units( FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:T Budgeted sales     quOle CompObjdffObjInfogEquation Native antity      in units) FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:Ȱ    Budgetedcontrib. mar_984327841jF߉߉Ole CompObjikfObjInfolEquation Native _984328536coF@։@։Ole CompObjnpfgin    per unit FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:T  Actual units     of aObjInfoqEquation Native _984328444hwtF@։@։Ole llproducts sold FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:Z   Actual sales mixpeCompObjsufObjInfovEquation Native _984328488yF@։@։rcentage( FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:ت,f Budgeted sales mixpercentage)Ole CompObjxzfObjInfo{Equation Native _984329033~F@։߉Ole CompObj}fObjInfo FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:|p Actual units     of allproducts sold(Equation Native _984329064|F߉߉Ole CompObjf FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:ĉ Budgeted units      of all products sold)ObjInfoEquation Native _984329140F߉߉Ole  FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q:0t Budgeted sales mixpercentageCompObjfObjInfoEquation Native _985254374m'F::Ole CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native p FMicrosoft Equation 2.0 DS Equation Equation.29qT$J\zJJ Market-sharevariance FMicrosoft Equation 2.0 DS Equation Equation.29q_985254422F::Ole CompObjfObjInfodJTJXzJ Actualmarket sizein units FMicrosoft Equation 2.0 DS Equation Equation.29q֐JTJXzJ ActuaEquation Native _985254521F:aOle CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native _985254926FaaOle lmarketshare(-Budgetedmarketshare)Budgetedcontribution marginper composite unitfor budgeted mix FMicrosoft Equation 2.0 DS EqCompObjfObjInfoEquation Native l_985254998TFaauation Equation.29qPDJ̉JJ Market-sizevariance FMicrosoft Equation 2.0 DS Equation Equation.29qOle CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native $J\zJJ Actualmarket sizein units(-Budgetedmarket sizein units) FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q_985411168YFaaOle CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native _989302449F  Ole CompObjf}z BudgetedmarketshareBudgetedcontribution marginper composite unitfor budgeted mix FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qt4 Market-sizevariance=Actualmarket sizein units("BudgetedObjInfoEquation Native _984292187 F *PIC T    "%&'),/012356789:;=>?@ABDEFGHIJKLMNOPRmarket sizein units)Budgetedmarket shareBudgetedcontribution marginper composite unitfor budgeted mixT,, j    .  & "-mm & 'b ddPro "l#lMETA  PICT bObjInfo_1082896102F** FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qP|I }I $235,000100,000Ole CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native l_9854106756F**Ole CompObjfObjInfo FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q}D Actual totalquantity of alldirect materialsinputs usedEquation Native _985410718F**Ole  CompObj!f FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q}sL Budgetedprice ofdirect materialsinputsObjInfo#Equation Native $_1080562083 F`3`3Data vADd!2<  C A? 2 uCh7/$ D4`! uCh7/$\D#@S`}S xZKl")Jҥ-5J14$ Neٖ7E/Ub,K$;0jqKдZFZnCzhZRZn v]F%,?}3;\$D's6r_=o'dy..]s/,-./^^Q೏mn"=;N[}lJ*| ˾v;2dХ3]L?!霙Z]V&/)SWg?_z"1v=0#P!c?w%W,d+)?Z mVQX3myc=3B /(,.(s/VfWYx8zV:X[ݤ7ztYtVz}w -6c8v=*}eefqev RշJ+IG`}m*<pXk|᫗s/hR+iQ:64ުR.T$`>Y~Ulo"OoGOziyi~6Et:AoCmk|\5!w$yiYi&yEE)P|؏`Ly>Eϳ3fGi֭I 8gzmVemjK=jjx}bWbl/MC>ܮB~>;7~3qYu@TKW _D~H.9{+wPqw|x%__xzSsVflN-QIr7aoOpTR37$g&Zx~X;"ƣ/8^T aOv#\&Gټ,s n|c ;Tq'c?X tL4{Lt;`>.;0aH[q`t2qwl8`';L%;d%9/:r ([뀩?JLȉrSOsgTLǚɳNu똠.?`e0!Ż6:K&T)YT0è!&o/n&o6d7$bjH 7 W_딟 9@@wq w9qSrZ{`؟T~2@pj?){01@=ܭnuN[M<.{v}]@}~Yi4tpi^'wuJnuA&"&Z7:O?$&#(Y(u'd&8lA yLEؾ|3z@wB`$<[vBjV;!o'G+UG8.?}}x*KX%΍_E"ûq3f(6;M|u5YG8|FElVf-ܕ.gn7v!νmv^-{GiƖsߥA˓s%QpR/ͮ%v❔1Table8CompObj(jObjInfo*ObjectPool`3`3zGY [4@4 NormalCJ_HmH sH tH D@D Heading 1$$dh@&a$ 56\]>@> Heading 2$$dh@&a$6]>@> Heading 3$$dh@&a$5\@@@ Heading 4$$@&a$5;OJQJ8@8 Heading 5$dh@&5\<@< Heading 6$$@&a$ 5CJ\d@d Heading 7:$$ 8p&d@&P]8^pa$5\H@H Heading 8$$dh@&a$5CJOJQJ@ @@ Heading 9 $$dh@&a$OJQJ<A@< Default Paragraph Font@O@ z-Top of Form $a$@CJBOB z-Bottom of FormdhB*CJ<:O: Normal (Web)$a$@<CJ06O"6 HTML Acronym1<CJLO2L HTML Address (^`CJ2OB2 HTML Cite1$a$CJ:OR: HTML Code1$`a$CJTObT HTML Definition1dx] ;B*CJJOrJ HTML Keyboard1$ @xa$CJPOP HTML Preformatted$ @<a$CJJOJ HTML Sample1$ @<xa$CJBOB HTML Typewriter1dxFOF HTML Variable1$ xa$CJ.O. EQ1$d8a$CJ2O2 EQ2$d8xa$CJ.O. NP$ xa$CJ4O4 NP2$ xxa$CJFOF ST' d&d @ Zo;CJ,O, EQ!$d8a$CJXO"XBL1$"$ x^`a$CJ_HmHnHsH tH u>O2> BL$#$ <^`a$CJDOBD BL2($$ <x^`a$CJ6OR6 TB%xxd8<]x^xCJ4Ob4H3&CJ_HmHnHsH tH u,Or, KTT1'$da$CJ:O: KT ( d^`CJ0O0 ECT)d;CJFOF Q-*$ d(^`a$CJ(O( P1+$da$CJHOH PBL1*,$ d^`a$CJFOF PBL*-$ d<^`a$CJdOdPBL2..$ d<^`a$CJ_HmHnHsH tH u.O. P/$d`a$CJ&O& RH 0d8CJ4O4 RL1$ @da$CJ:O": RL22$ @da$CJ6O26 RLL3$ Dda$CJ0OB0 RT4$d`a$CJ"OAR" RT1 5`>Ob> PEXSP6$d^a$CJ<Or< PNL17$ @da$CJ:O: PNL8$ @dFa$CJ@O@ PNL2!9$ @d<a$CJ&O& AH:dBB*CJ>O> TBH";xxd8&d]x^xCJ8O8 TB1<xxd8]x^xCJ:O:FN=d8CJ_HmHnHsH tH u&O& PBS>;CJ&O& PBT1?$a$CJ,O, PBT@$`a$CJ@O@ TH"Axxd8&d]x^x;CJHO"H TBFN*B 1xxdL]x^xCJ"O2" FGTCxCJ@OB@ TBH2"Dxxd8&d]x^xCJOR B1ECJ:Ob: BNLF$ @d2a$CJ@Or@ BNL2!G$ @d2xa$CJ"O" B H`CJ.O. BFNId8($dCJ2B@2 Body TextJ$dha$HC@H Body Text IndentK$dh`a$0+@0 Endnote TextLCJ6*@6 Endnote ReferenceH*>P@> Body Text 2N$ &dha$6Q@6 Body Text 3O$a$5\8"@8 CaptionP$dha$ 56]0@0 Header Q !CJLR@"L Body Text Indent 2R$dh^a$0 @20 Footer S !CJxOBx TOTd$d%d&d'd1$NOPQB*OJQJhphHT@RH Block Text"U$dh<]^a$bObb TCH=V  ` 0 x=#d8&dP CJOJQJ&)@q& Page NumberRS@R Body Text Indent 3Xdh^`CJ0123450123458  (    |&   +-8:l,2$uCh7/$ F@( h.06n l  0) V  C A ?"  TB'!CDEF'!@"VB  C D"VB  C D"VB  C D"B S  ?BY&1-t!)1)tP  t_H  t H1Ht!24 _1045551158 _1045551178 _1060602747@@@+1Xqjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdhbs<C:\My Documents\Srikant\BOOK\HFD(11e)\Ch16(11e)\c16(11e).DOCOH"W*xMuRi#|0$-jT=\X)8Եg J\_ mh{ N 6 @C<G!vqwF ayx -F< ܹޭdd0Zz]k!jS0Dg"b#%+>DZ(ndv;)!D,|Rz-2q)/D?/te&0]k0A*b5(f6հ7d9z:^"q(=6H\BMPM*CkSTM>eUUD*w VR$KVt0`}Y(KA[߮Z\fƘ^%]j(ia]rO^t0 s_hDnKc|Z>;\?evB ZUgDwWibriZl"jfdom4nF aO}nj(ytoUŽRp0/LnqPI r{Yr/*Fszzt4UwDdp#xJRxD('MyWlLO{["|BlP&~հ7qF04 T[0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.^`B*CJOJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`56o(.h ^`OJQJo( 0 ^ `0o(.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.z^`zo(.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.^`CJOJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.H@^`HCJOJQJo(0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(h ^`56o(.h ^`56o(.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(. 808^8`056o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`B*CJOJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.H@^`HCJOJQJo(h^`B*CJOJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h 808^8`056o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`05o(.p0p^p`05o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h 808^8`056o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L. ^`56o(. ^`56o(.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.8 ^`56o(.8^`.8 $ $ ^$ `56o(.8@ @ ^@ `.8^`.8L^`L.8^`.8^`.8PLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.808^8`0o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.H@^`HCJOJQJo(h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.OYrztQAyg s_)(ytol"je&0|0iH" O}nRp,i@C]k!>H["|^%]d9qF*b5`}Y4MZ\Gp#xZUgq)/LUHCkSPM:*FsBMA[v;)eUUnKcLnqqw4nk0ia]lLO{DZ(O@R@ G:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial9Palatino9CG TimesA& Arial Narrow9New York?5 :Courier New;Wingdings"AhՋdf֋df!>0dPhbsHBS  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q Oh+'0L _1060602747 F`3`31TableCompObj+jObjInfo-      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFcIJKLMNOPQRTUVWXYZ\]^_`ab%efghijklmnopqrstuvwxy{&~X [4@4 NormalCJ_HmH sH tH DD Heading 1$$dh@&a$ 56\]>> Heading 2$$dh@&a$6]>@> Heading 3$$dh@&a$5\@@ Heading 4$$@&a$5;OJQJ88 Heading 5$dh@&5\<< Heading 6$$@&a$ 5CJ\dd Heading 7:$$ 8p&d@&P]8^pa$5\HH Heading 8$$dh@&a$5CJOJQJ@ @ Heading 9 $$dh@&a$OJQJ<A@< Default Paragraph Font@@ z-Top of Form $a$@CJBB z-Bottom of FormdhB*CJ<:: Normal (Web)$a$@<CJ04"4 HTML Acronym<CJL2L HTML Address (^`CJ0B0 HTML Cite$a$CJ8R8 HTML Code$`a$CJRbR HTML Definitiondx] ;B*CJHrH HTML Keyboard$ @xa$CJPP HTML Preformatted$ @<a$CJHH HTML Sample$ @<xa$CJ@O@ HTML TypewriterdxDD HTML Variable$ xa$CJ.. EQ1$d8a$CJ22 EQ2$d8xa$CJ.. NP$ xa$CJ44 NP2$ xxa$CJFF ST' d&d @ Zo;CJ,, EQ!$d8a$CJX"XBL1$"$ x^`a$CJ_HmHnHsH tH u>2> BL$#$ <^`a$CJDBD BL2($$ <x^`a$CJ6R6 TB%xxd8<]x^xCJ4b4H3&CJ_HmHnHsH tH u,r, KTT1'$da$CJ:: KT ( d^`CJ00 ECT)d;CJFF Q-*$ d(^`a$CJ(( P1+$da$CJHH PBL1*,$ d^`a$CJFF PBL*-$ d<^`a$CJddPBL2..$ d<^`a$CJ_HmHnHsH tH u.. P/$d`a$CJ&& RH 0d8CJ44 RL1$ @da$CJ:": RL22$ @da$CJ626 RLL3$ Dda$CJ0B0 RT4$d`a$CJ"AR" RT1 5`>b> PEXSP6$d^a$CJ<r< PNL17$ @da$CJ:: PNL8$ @dFa$CJ@@ PNL2!9$ @d<a$CJ&& AH:dBB*CJ>> TBH";xxd8&d]x^xCJ88 TB1<xxd8]x^xCJ::FN=d8CJ_HmHnHsH tH u&& PBS>;CJ&& PBT1?$a$CJ,, PBT@$`a$CJ@@ TH"Axxd8&d]x^x;CJH"H TBFN*B 1xxdL]x^xCJ"2" FGTCxCJ@B@ TBH2"Dxxd8&d]x^xCJR B1ECJ:b: BNLF$ @d2a$CJ@r@ BNL2!G$ @d2xa$CJ"" B H`CJ.. BFNId8($dCJ2B2 Body TextJ$dha$HCH Body Text IndentK$dh`a$0+0 Endnote TextLCJ6*@6 Endnote ReferenceH*>P> Body Text 2N$ &dha$6Q6 Body Text 3O$a$5\8"8 CaptionP$dha$ 56]00 Header Q !CJLR"L Body Text Indent 2R$dh^a$0 20 Footer S !CJxBx TOTd$d%d&d'd1$NOPQB*OJQJhphHTRH Block Text"U$dh<]^a$bbb TCH=V  ` 0 x=#d8&dP CJOJQJ&)@q& Page Number        8@0(   B S  ?COjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaiAC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\My Documents\HFD's\16_p5676.DOCjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdjiranee tongudaicC:\Documents and Settings\jiranee\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of 16_p5676.asdhbs<C:\My Documents\Srikant\BOOK\HFD(11e)\Ch16(11e)\c16(11e).DOCIH"W*xMuRi#|0$-jT=\X)8Եg J\_ mh{ N 6 @C<G!vyx -F< ܹޭdd0Zz]k!jS0Dg"b#%+>v;)!D,|Rz-2q)/D?/te&0]*b5(f6հ7d9z:^"q(=6H\BMPM*CkSTM>eUUD*w VR$KVt0`}Y(KA[߮Z\fƘ^%]j(rO^t0 s_hDnKc|Z>;\?evB ZUgDwWibriZl"jfdomO}nj(ytoUŽRp0/LnqPI r{Yr/*Fszzt4UwDdp#xJRxD('MyW["|BlP&~հ7qF04 T[0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.^`B*CJOJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`56o(.h ^`OJQJo( 0 ^ `0o(.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.z^`zo(.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h ^`56o(.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(. 808^8`056o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`B*CJOJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h^`B*CJOJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h 808^8`056o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`05o(.p0p^p`05o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h 808^8`056o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L. ^`56o(. ^`56o(.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.8 ^`56o(.8^`.8 $ $ ^$ `56o(.8@ @ ^@ `.8^`.8L^`L.8^`.8^`.8PLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.808^8`0o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.0^`0o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h ^`56o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.IYrztQAyg s_)(ytol"je&0|0iH" O}nRp,i@C]k!>H["|^%]d9qF*b5`}Y4MZ\Gp#xZUgq)/LUHCkSPM:*FsBMA[v;)eUUnKcLnqI@h@ G:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial9CG TimesS PalatinoBook AntiquaA& Arial NarrowY New YorkTimes New Roman?5 zCourier New;Wingdings"hXfXf !20dhbshbsuserObjectPool`3`3WordDocumentHSummaryInformation(SDocumentSummaryInformation8[Y  bjbjWW ==]88888888 ,\$|>8'88'''88L"n"8888'n'88 x0@YEXHIBIT 16-6 Customer-Profitability Analysis for Spring Distribution in June 2004 PANEL A: CUSTOMERS RANKED ON CUSTOMER-LEVEL OPERATING INCOME Customer-Level Operating Income Cumulative as a % of Total Customer-Level Customer Customer-Level Customer-Level Customer Operating Income Revenue Operating Income Operating Income Code (1) (2) (3) (4) = (3) $134,000 B $ 52,380 $ 472,000 $ 52,380 39% A 35,620 560,000 88,000 66 C 20,650 255,000 108,650 81 D 16,840 247,000 125,490 94 F 6,994 123,500 132,484 99 J 3,380 36,000 135,864 101 E 3,176 193,000 139,040 104 G 1,120 38,500 137,920 103 H 1,760 38,000 136,160 102 I -2,160 37,000 134,000 100% $134,000 $2,000,000 PANEL B: CUSTOMERS RANKED ON REVENUES Customer-Level Cumulative Operating Income Customer Revenue Customer Customer-Level as a % of Cumulative as a % of Customer Revenue Operating Income Revenue Customer Revenue Total Revenues Code (1) (2) (3)=(2) (1) (4) (5)=(4) $2,000,000 A $ 560,000 $ 35,620 0.064 $ 560,000 28% B 472,000 52,380 0.111 1,032,000 52 C 255,000 20,650 0.081 1,287,000 64 D 247,000 16,840 0.068 1,534,000 77 E 193,000 3,176 0.016 1,727,000 86 F 123,500 6,994 0.057 1,850,500 93 G 38,500 21,120 (0.029) 1,889,000 94 H 38,000 21,760 (0.046) 1,927,000 96 I 37,000 22,160 (0.058) 1,964,000 98 J 36,000 3,380 0.094 2,000,000 100% $2,000,000 $134,000  SVC O P [ s } ~ CJ 5CJCJ>*>*5CJ5 RSV}~1Nk $ @ P d&d  ,4 $  ,4$dh&dd RSV}~1Nk 2k<a @ q   . 2k<a @ q $ vj "$&d  PX $  PX $&d$dh$ @  $dh vj "/ =!"#$%Oh+'0P    $08@Hsshbsbs Normal.dothbsuser2suMicrosoft Word 8.0@@飽0@飽0՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|  hbs j  Title 6> _PID_GUIDAN{0AC9EC26-13A3-11D5-ABB2-00C04F757198}WordDocumentd+SummaryInformation(.|DocumentSummaryInformation841TableUq  bjbjt+t+ +AA6]$<<<<P,<";N$6;. $n#ݻ0^ &E<<. SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-28 Income Statement of Zoots Suits for 2003  Customer Distribution Channels  Wholesale Customers Retail Customers Total Total April Madison Total Suitors Design (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)  Revenues (at actual prices) Customer-level optg. costs Customer-level operating income Distribution-channel costs Distribution-channel-level operating income Corporate-sustaining costs Operating income $6,654,200 5,152,970 1,501,230 560,000 941,230 250,000 $ 691,230  $4,448,000 3,395,720 1,052,280 350,000  $2,464,000 1,973,070 $ 490,930 $1,984,0000 1,422,650 $ 561,350 $2,206,200 1,757,250 448,950 210,000 $ 238,950  $1,081,200 871,900 $ 209,300 $1,125,000 885,350 $ 239,650  $ 702,280  EMBED Word.Document.8 \s  BCVWcq|  &25BNYfhuv¿@<>*CJOJQJ>*CJOJQJ>*CJ>*CJ CJOJQJCJj5CJUmHjCJUmH5CJ(5CJ5j5UmH;CJOJQJj;CJOJQJUmH<ABc+FWXcqr|$dh$ dh$X$dh$dhdh $dhd&d d 4l#ABc+FWXcqr|  &'26BNOWfghuvw  X  T|  & $dh$ $3dh$dh$ $dh$ v$dh$&'3456BNOWfguvwxdh$dh$dh$ $\dh$ $dh$$dh$XPJJHH$dh$hdh$$Tk4   hw;$)|-.21O EB$dh$ j{7? CJUVmH jU>*CJCJ jUmH      $ $ &0&P0= /!"#$%/ =!"#$%`! uCh7/$\D#@S`}S xZKl")Jҥ-5J14$ Neٖ7E/Ub,K$;0jqKдZFZnCzhZRZn v]F%,?}3;\$D's6r_=o'dy..]s/,-./^^Q೏mn"=;N[}lJ*| ˾v;2dХ3]L?!霙Z]V&/)SWg?_z"1v=0#P!c?w%W,d+)?Z mVQX3myc=3B /(,.(s/VfWYx8zV:X[ݤ7ztYtVz}w -6c8v=*}eefqev RշJ+IG`}m*<pXk|᫗s/hR+iQ:64ުR.T$`>Y~Ulo"OoGOziyi~6Et:AoCmk|\5!w$yiYi&yEE)P|؏`Ly>Eϳ3fGi֭I 8gzmVemjK=jjx}bWbl/MC>ܮB~>;7~3qYu@TKW _D~H.9{+wPqw|x%__xzSsVflN-QIr7aoOpTR37$g&Zx~X;"ƣ/8^T aOv#\&Gټ,s n|c ;Tq'c?X tL4{Lt;`>.;0aH[q`t2qwl8`';L%;d%9/:r ([뀩?JLȉrSOsgTLǚɳNu똠.?`e0!Ż6:K&T)YT0è!&o/n&o6d7$bjH 7 W_딟 9@@wq w9qSrZ{`؟T~2@pj?){01@=ܭnuN[M<.{v}]@}~Yi4tpi^'wuJnuA&"&Z7:O?$&#(Y(u'd&8lA yLEؾ|3z@wB`$<[vBjV;!o'G+UG8.?}}x*KX%΍_E"ûq3f(6;M|u5YG8|FElVf-ܕ.gn7v!νmv^-{GiƖsߥA˓s%QpR/ͮ%v❔   ,4<Dsshbsbs Normal.dotHBS2SMicrosoft Word 8.0@F#@vE@%E ՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|  hbs1  Title 6> _PID_GUIDAN{D32E65D1-15E2-4BB3-93E9-E4389F6E2B3C} Oh+'0  4 @ L Xdlt| CHAPTER 14HAP My CompuB  S A? 2|F9 ?p׀9!X.n`!PF9 ?p׀9! (+dxUPJA}3w0"l)4šw R `>REk;1 fv̛!4 rä5FLT!,mRp;hqއ XFhşK *7HWJ=I&ڋ Ut:|3Hq,K~Z$c꽘|InvlȁVȣνak ر3M3r:bXSMit*^wH'14pMNkYO(<DdB   S A ? 2|XGSpV QX@n`!PXGSpV Q dxUPJA}3w&3"lJgR.XEZK??HkEkٽ f7Ch+Z1GUU)ڣ5p8W9 ᲠQYg!s8/z xA$/v ]r2hEah1'|Fһ,Azuѿ{9;(l؏'cgSN)rzT\?EN eľX'|'hj4h0 h&zm7)D=DdB   S A ?  2zAqxo)68KnVRn`!NAqxo)68Kn (+dxUPN@ }vBCJDC]" Rn ! \$ϗ z}~ m x\؄; bmnՈ*E^Ǻ.1:አ26P9bJx Stp^F)E3ܑd쑯#EC~|4ntErzoQL>Idfkf9jwܻ-܀]4b hM=MDx1"J1o4DNkY/(l==DdB   S A ?  2{)24: _Wbn`!O)24: _ dxUPJA}3w^P BTlVh~ šw 颥ȧXZX36bh9;{tav̾f M{l؆]KMU,KEYoWG_b !|&QsO4nxݤ Naq@ w :o8攔{WY:N":9ދG[ToGf⽑AV&:~\1I9=PtO SMi'" ͞y|4Wdz~J?O0=Ddl B   S A ?  2N|V*d- Esn`!N|V*d- E2xm1K@]IS"":ZO"Mj{i+$UppK|WE *w; ǽ߻r90 1pTYi:U$ҷDi7æBk!4pC.3G16lRpVWE8P|qrq+̝k3:0:ev~_Q3"|M"~ "p~|KGyшY=1PXOb^v۝V fz}YnSujR*K;~dgJgkh]*YWś֩YO 8vXB"fn|VUvqM>I״EG5=M!Y75dGTMbhVnٵLYbφŤJwg-X͉֏YKVu&IDdLHB   S A ?  2z{mPj@V#n`!N{mPj@@ "xMP1N@;;((D *D ( `a#QRQ<$E#\'vvvnvB{ {:|C@Z)nVЮZwܞ^TW:"}y m@ks>c4; o{&IZ_%NY_G~_#U)5M̲805euıg&s@I4ӌBo=-;'ܸ/sT5Ug nQMCN,b;ƒdSهz|\TkOz o%O[vnQLҬب91cќMBwrw!xJK5"$lUn. =qkd/f 3@$Dd4B  S A? 2sDhLjDn`!bsDhL 4 p0xMJ1O2]p,,BvΏ0YK+ җgǛLF |$' !|X=!3fi mn/mxKXEmR='z.ylM$1o>1.p沊dy\`o@lQ7\+UgDJKЪ YVy0Õg=ݻ:HU%St=cxDę9 m!|ScL+%s}0mJf)FDdt$B  S A? 2nrkU4"v1{h!n`!nrkU4"v1{& @0HD xmR=KA"~zX0VBS%!w X * Z wvQXnyoa0(cG" c2ðLeff'0ij39,dKZDmq'$V49Ľ/it`+%,=ONf,-5x *-X2mfxn\tn>C98y/kAVY{l)MF|Ct"ǃZk[qJ(6ލƌhy4|}9k)#rik>o͗XWs{glUQJ[W̙}yƈzb>J]KM?4Az#z8o*ثpGH;f=G$VZ~=WG}RJcDdt B  S A? 2zʋ?x8C6$n`!zʋ?x8C6  qdoxeRN@-QL OJ A ozBlƊ $ʍc/&|`bYug%A73Ec/^)mYbF EQ$HUJrZna]{; py'mokscbNN~g|p-I&WY2Q/7 EÝlN2n˿sA ^Dtk'i)م2O-#/h%0-r ̭hn.0U٬Ҍ{>Bu 1\RbPzy]lc:sr SUTyی:"gCG~LĨ(:^Dd B  S A? 2!F ؒx&n`!!F ؒ `zdxmR=KP%MgAT:T% g`?J G_СBbgw_b/9s{_*%$Fa(P{6թàyhUE L·U)'_׺W|F|m{- 4э7q'BO]4vVg0< tbO"dt`ݒGZΰJcX_q3`ݲbǾ򨢢`I EENcl!D>4pO&=}rD+Y vE㉂Y6Kk=,dr;HpŎ21w12!-@)jOׯ_Z8V-VGN_Yg'?la*L A{L{oX4aɔf5-DL+!d]+r9Uv5 3g3P4ifUyް}L/3=7QlߒqSf^ +TjeLjb$]Dd@pB  S A? 2.Q6J$T+n`!.Q6J$Z pixmQ=K@~ͥ`)"ѡ`Q'Tu5ФJlOp8w_qSPto =sϛ& <}ng ˲$fF6sDSVeV0hh>FNx~q*VϿ\^Gh]<zφ9r6b5}1[׼90| ߏ2I }up*4VΚ;i BZiȱIX¨]2c:Բh$fGKzӽ`(3{ACMP%6eL;x VkscaS Dd B  S A? 2"[ƎOf-n`!^"[ƎO (8,xMN0?;b"v@!iU1$<b`aDt.|u,}; @z9}*)QB6Mê/ ;mѓp.#wh !KR+1\19=\&`>Q'trY-\M+UG<)pY/ӯ@z'M,KYU-yLT$fWD+`.=%'ea/n"R]C܍n[:Q*5 !B`f ?x(l' PHyx3V*;;xz:N*\ aH:Dd< B  S A? 2g IEt _xmQNPmH1`"Q@7+)ZSG'7-Ee`3{{wwcpkkP_s34M5j[^FT0qj+XEP%>#@!IFS]v⋏u1W 8fz6nm:g8&Kt{5j7Q'trY-\M+UG<)pY/ӯ@z'M,KYU-yLT$fWD+`.=%'ea/n"R]C܍n[:Q*5 !B`f ?x(l' PHyx3V*;;xz:N*\ aHlDdpB  S A? 2Hy1'kn8n`!Hy1'knr %xxmQ=O@ ]:!P``@P0MRTM[2 LD}Eֽ QB"4sjdYviZQp*Ms V 2 !=%S#/h>@.>K47ůgQpkk6;K9`cFcrcU\:'ѿ6$Q|J$>X =S$ m[Uț&QжpYbDubi!~!W`ląa߼y;o|y sz"!a'-/#-5B*6И6 -(^<`R8tI'D8r]F'ήG=O?ӾzA:@]C 뢊S3oC(}$$ʔ͟G_4`MQ'trY-\M+UG<)pY/ӯ@z'M,KYU-yLT$fWD+`.=%'ea/n"R]C܍n[:Q*5 !B`f ?x(l' PHyx3V*;;xz:N*\ aHDdB  S A? 2jl=|m1,.J"GFAn`!>l=|m1,.J"G `%P x5PMJPf&-4(t\'uŵyPJ].{zYuܬ, ?BBzDK2Y> Y*Q,L8)ίuv d͛#dgJJ4eMkRIefנ]FHօJɝr4r ^B+:N"z 1Wy7VoxQF DdB  S A? 2o}1;tSKEn`!C}1;tS h+@ x}kAǿ3q7LhI! &)b{M2ݰE=U"Ȃ x?Гz)Z3o&!.d_>~3; Nт8jU.#l6#r]!Ιj__QQۭ*fzwOj]^U[S  p̚2-Ha5fzr1WEzi9ÙB y.ҶʏmNiÝ اXUUq?oTrvD=kܨ_cyi4{*Qn UIIHik6ջEҶ(ܙ\t=s6tׁH^!69ٷ>ϜO ?d*_gm:nTSgqwiűy7Ӗ>7Crb=J{mxFXe_.w<.kA w""d 5MKZ^2dIH2H|gYhPiLh77GTfv|a(Q_r4Dd(B  S A? 2hvrXd&7GN_tDHn`!<vrXd&7GN_t|@` P x5PJP=3I_iPUq.~A.jqm I&(ٹu/paH>p^0L\f̙ùC>t X3_Q"C6 9ejC?%;!M̰0_3WIɹ{x J6W.*HwU,|E;%On#Ruކ$U/ƨ]c14!zVmm|tr6de3ADd tB  S A? 2+5w722[f@Jn`!+5w722[f@@  xK@߻? M-q18_YEF4شŤH NY7::UQ0Dws$NA2n) Ȃ dYb'ط_$YTf N') 5Y0jmp}B@ڎֱr&2;1E >( eYythykH 55};!i"Rgiڞcheo!]媵N}:/4ۏ*WrWrUuv[ `k( <\:Si @t=1><LJ۷I{\0 !'ve85c2k`y*c3[b=D$:an)[}7b9T 7 Fn$ c> 7rž5V_Fo% LQǑ:r\׎Ӟ`M$gs%#gTVc굃@_6匳9c;gŴI[<0 ղT٣W[(LV܄;Z &}v_DdLB  S A? 2ext `?)r Pn`!ext `?)rx.@HH0= kxmSMhA~3n6AJE Th=x*b^6$]4C"Qу"x&$< ) A{*y3IXo7/X8PhQBTDhQ )0MfzY:~Wv.A5%=ʿ_wCWk{QbMOgxOJ_ ר?zz, -ğm ߣ1wm^ g@OľJG;͘оnJiX&8h'{)gC@9IDdB  S A? 2RBHM.kSn`!&BHMd@ 8 dx5O1NQ}3 ,$lC!Jb@.@ $:-wZ w˼7*!Q$C1wtm=Ii^ ԟ> @4l4,S[ F6R1ࡡ=}'̈YJK2Yd9-mGog4ƅntFv 7_GM nb<  C A? 2 pC0.34 vZn`! pC0.34)w A xZMl%ES?I?rr%[?+y$% PQ7r,H[XvX\*@{)P H4>%c#jucA !iQC60|h{jl# 57;$};;ߛhЫIBz@awrYB" d/=;ES ?$Z0M~zEq'J=OVW%\(].UvQ:B 0+߽prYmDne<{bxiC(/D}aCN< G˩fô}w9{/y`}w}4;0ה'- kI8~2_ S"mmו܂QXJ^@2LGN >}ڳl;~ "Ζrň<z$9NRrWK<`Q-2ɢU awGS-0x_ ZX3u훏xlnwth=rs` b\߼R+W\k|͘V1uJh^Khn1^׾$"GLV?,U9(C'pըar4nPgK?,UWaбbC*4V!Bb[)! aywz +M^ó Z髏sveui %TH4+aDOoG4g:q7=Ěϵ+KҊVoa,Eg9=W9X(|NڕR(W/͏Clu_>ahDhTOi{I4T(g1?w膞vMZ~k|. ć^:#~=^?W5br5JlAYq"cm0eiX-ծh]UT2k (BbR+LüyKZ2(Zfayi F|tk<4YػFػ6g9YUbZ qjU޴z,Vy%#Yc8w((ۙvPݝA鰵qLt_F?2<5H3k. }-zJ|3s(]]oGyxZOEN HGwh$JsyyVURFwc#COh3V]39J-Xy-具Ā:-*%ѴAv;M*ٯ}m6vV~{DZ7ߪrn&׽߾ip}3 ,YYY:[(qeܜ"ϵz=]_w>Z1n5 1cX/ a^ +ċvX~=dXb,M圪B%%?uNX JtlEqbpU ߊeV[i>ugLsUecxgB}4#geNOuvӪ cgpwZ-4,w߻(n]EA C?^&8*Nlmگ1积( P*'V+l5>;-wf)0gchͳꖣNԁZľl)>LO~[c 3:6z*н=fhdjSOcM6·zV99L^LmݣOl=V  d|}p[c  vb+݌ ;Ư][/~۟~͕1c_ FߒP1L^.>~/hS|>}hq"bf?vQb]Y|.o8jG?{mA60! $!D!n0v4]"{% lB")@ȟ/a-';ӽt<bs~-c}9WpFHG~;(y=Y}g5 [$@$NormalmH @@@ Heading 1 $$@&5CJOJQJH@H Heading 2$$@&5CJOJQJD@D Heading 3$@&5CJOJQJj@j Heading 45$$p$d%d&d'd(d@&5CJOJQJZ@Z Heading 51$$@& # h  ^ <#(-CJRR Heading 6*$@& $ ,0TCJX@X Heading 7#$$@& hH$5CJOJQJD@D Heading 8$$@&5CJOJQJ@ @@ Heading 9 $@& 5CJ<A@<Default Paragraph Font.P@. Body Text 2CJ2Q@2 Body Text 35CJ8O8POd H( OJQJmH @O"@Avant Garde,agCJOJQJmH 626 Courier,cCJOJQJmH 6B6 Bookman,bCJOJQJmH :R: Helvetica,hCJOJQJmH RbRNew Helvetica Narrow,hnCJOJQJmH XrXNew Century Schoolbook,ncsCJOJQJmH << Palatino,palCJOJQJmH BBPrinceton,princCJOJQJmH 22Times,tCJOJQJmH DDZapf Chancery,zcCJOJQJmH 4O4indent h CJOJQJ8O8Indent 2  CJOJQJ8O8Double U >*44 endnote textOJQJPCPBody Text Indent $ CJOJQJ: @:Footer!$ ! CJOJQJRS@"RBody Text Indent 3"$hd CJOJQJBB@2B Body Text#$  CJOJQJ6@B6 Footnote Text$OJQJ6OR6PP%$d H OJQJmH TTbT Block Text"&n hH$ CJOJQJ>r>P1'$H d H OJQJmH &)@& Page Number:@:Header)$ ! CJOJQJ2"@2Caption *$CJ(U@( Hyperlink>*B*2>2Title ,$ 5CJ4J4Subtitle - 5CJ6'@6Comment ReferenceCJ,@, Comment Text/FOF HTML Typewriter10dxCJ,O, HTML Cite11$*O"* KTT1 2$dCJRR@2RBody Text Indent 23$v 8@@CJ$X@A$Emphasis6 *7CRao{ 0Np6Vt<Yz,?   pqrcdeVWXIJK678/01~}+, *7CRao{ 0Np6Vt<Yz,/      !"#$%&'()*+,-ӫP?%Jl ,........1):6GeTUW]Yam)s5y-ٯI.PGa_C E*T!^$+ 3@PVj?!*037HQYcir} n&'(()1*++r,---L.>/=3778k<;==EE+FF:GGHvJ#PUUW{[.]]^F_.`aaabb7cccHdd7ee(gimp0r ss?@BDEGJKMNOPSTUVXZ\]_`bdfhjlnpqtuwyz|~ c# )Q,1[<m=&EEFGHP[]_abncDddekqLst'|2l˨#kQҽ˾KR5Qpk9s>fW- n-AQ[Ƀ? "&-28;=ACFILRW[^aegkmosvx{0G-PLPPPdPfPkPPPPPP6QJQLQQQeQgQnQQQQQQ RR!R)R=R?RXRlRnRvRRRSSSSSSSSSSSTU UU!U%U9U;U;OQJ^`dxz~*,/CEI]_cwy-ACK_ah|~ )+q!'*RV7UZt Y ] q s }     -0dCFyVZ?x{&)be8;OQThj*)d)g))))***[+`+y+0(1+11122K2334644444'5Z\\\vbbbe=eWe?11:::::::::::1:::1::::::::::::::::::::::11111111111:1:11111111111111111::11111111111111XXX&)1!!!/:l ,2$pC0.34 @i h( "n vN p@&`'`'  ZB  S Dp@&p`' ZB  S D`'@&`'`' TB  C Dp`'`'`' N p$`'%  ZB  S Dp$p% ZB  S D $ % ZB  S D`'$`'% TB  C Dp%`'% N p$`'%  ZB  S Dp$p% ZB  S D $ % ZB  S D`'$`'% TB  C Dp%`'% vN p@&`'`'  ZB  S Dp@&p`' ZB  S D`'@&`'`' TB  C Dp`'`'`' N p$`'%  ZB  S Dp$p% ZB  S D $ % ZB  S D`'$`'% TB  C Dp%`'% vN p@&`'`'  ZB  S Dp@&p`' ZB  S D`'@&`'`' TB  C Dp`'`'`' NB  S D NB  S D NB  S D NB  S DNB  S D  ZBCDEF@  ZBCDEF@   ZBCDEF@  ZBCDEF@   ZBC(DEF(@ NB  S D NB  S DNB  S D NB  S DNB  S DNB  S D"NB  S D#NB  S D$ NB  S D cNB   S D,NB   S D+NB   S D1NB   S D0  ZBCDEF@-NB  S D3 NB  S D2 NB  S D)NB  S D' NB  S D((R  5(b  6(R  8(b  7(R  ;(b  :(R  F(b  E(R   I(b ! HHB " C DMNB # S DLNB $ S DKHB % C DJ(b & GNB -@ S DptNB . S DotT / C !/u !T 0 C "0v "T 1 C #1t- #vN % 2 sTB 3 C D% ZB 4 S D ZB 5 S D%% T 6 C 6wk T 7 C 7xo T 8 C  8|  vN % 9 zTB : C D%dZB ; S DdZB < S D%%dN (@$  rZB ? S D($`B @ c $D(@(`B A c $D$@$B B vDF ` 814PP@8q|T @% D# yTB E C D%eZB F S D@eZB G S D%@%eTB H c $D{hN I 3 Z N J 3 ~X N K 3 p vN % L }TB M C D%[ZB N S D[ZB O S D%%[BN @% P Z @% Q @%TB R C D%ZZB S S D@ZZB T S D%@%ZZB U S D@ZN V 3  N W 3  N X 3 ( vN % Y TB Z C D% ZB [ S D ZB \ S D%% BN @% ] Z @% ^ @%TB _ C D% ZB ` S D@ ZB a S D%@% ZB b S D@ N c 3  N d 3  N e 3 ' vN % f TB g C D% ZB h S D ZB i S D%% BN @% j Z @% k @%TB l C D% ZB m S D@ ZB n S D%@% ZB o S D@ N p 3  N q 3  N r 3  vN % s TB t C D%ZB u S DZB v S D%%BN @% w Z @% x @%TB y C D% ZB z S D@ ZB { S D%@% ZB | S D@ H } # (} (B ~  ' 'B   & &B   % %B   $ $0N hX t  vZ hX t  hX tTB  C DhTB  C DtTB  C DX X tTB  C DX 0N hX t  vZ hX t  hX tTB  C DhTB  C DtTB  C DX X tTB  C DX NB  S D3  `BCDEF@    `BCDEF@ HB  C D HB  C D  `BCDEF@   `BCDEF@%  fBCDEF@!4  `B(CDEF(@*  fB(CDEF(@&   `BCDEF@/  fBCDEF@.  `B$CDEF$@U  ZBCDEF@A  ZBCDEF@DNB  S D>YNB  S D?/NB  S DCPNB  S DBPHB  C D=NB  S D@+NB  S DNNB  S DPNB  S DONB  S DRNB  S DSHB  C DQHB  C DT  ZB[CDEF[@d  ZBLCDEFL@gNB  S DaNB  S DcNB  S DeNB  S DfHB  C D`NB  S DbNB  S DjNB  S DiNB  S DhNB  S DmNB  S DlHB  C DkHB  C DnHB  C D]HB  C D\NB  S DNB  S DNB  S D  ZBCrDEFr@NB  S DHB  C D  TBCDEF@HB  C DZ  S +9" +Z  S *< *HB  C DVN  S A )?WFHB  C D[  `B3'CDEF3'@Z  ZB"CDEF"@^  ZBCDEF@_  `B)"CDEF)"@  `B)"CDEF)"@  `B$CDEF$@HB  C DHB  C DHB  C D3HB  C D4Z  S .4 .HB  C DXHB  C DY  `BCDEF@  `BpCDEFp@HB  C D2HB  C D1HB  C D0HB  C D/HB  C D.HB  C D-HB  C D,HB  C D+T  C * T  C ) T  C ( T  C ' T  C & <  # %<  # $<  #  <  # <  # #<  # "<  # !<  #  <  # <  # T  C  NB  S DT  C  NB  S DT  C  NB  S DT  C    NB  S DT  C    NB  S DT  C    NB  S DT  C    NB  S DT  C    NB  S DT   C   T   C   NB   S D NB   S D T   C    T  C   B S  ?"P$U&r()?+DDDDDDDDDD D!D"D#D$D%D&D'D(D)D*D+D,D-D.D/D0D1D2D3D4D5D6D7D8D9D:D;DD?D@DADBDD@FYYYYYYYZZZZZZG[H[I[J[K[L[M[iinnnnnnnooooooo=p>p?p@pApBpCp5u6u7uvvv'x(x*x-{`~a~b~d~~~~͂΂ς+,Yki w?[\abcdef;<=WX !"pqrcdefgik]%='/Z/=k??G"t)"T$T#T#TTHtMt 1t( 1 t@L6t pb2 t @ !t  r#!v$t 6$">&t !#tP!t!tdt& t\tVt 0t tttt` t BD vt| t  t t!#%t totJntV&tqt  t pt B)*t@Lt#B%tR  ttda ,a td$td2,2tx@td$,$tx@tdN*,N*td2d:*t#!#TW!Tt t1 t0 0 t1 t0 0 tt; @ t|t1 2 tt1 ttD XD 4tO @@tgCtgCt@ tD D t3tB {t"t=]t= L= <t@ LMt@ 6@ &t6&tB2t@ 01t1 Ytt1 1 tGGt@ ThUt YOY?t @ O@ ?t8"t@ 78t@ STt >.t @ >@ .tQAt@ Q@ At2 t tXtj8tH j tGAt(]tx]tb t*$*t u t|$u|$t>u>t $t$$t t $ttxt&hFt!hFt :(t%((t$?t#88?t"8ta aVt VtGtatRR.tKtQtT$tt"T@3ZtH!HT 4T 4t4TB'T'Txti$ t*$*t  t t^$^$ t ^$t  t^$^$t ^$tGtGtRRGtat<tCCtQt.dp.t-v dtB7@ 8It2 u8%t1#Ct/ &t0&2t60 )t7_tD 8t9 8tH''t8#_CtL 8tJ8}tI GtP J8tKP}p&tX4tVl 5LtW95t] 8dtY 84tcl &Ltdte2Rtj 8dtf 84tr Atw :tq  tp@ ts tGtGtRRGtatCDGt<tQt}B fxt~: t + tOs t t Gtz!t p" t "t $t$t mp#t p#t _1045644732 _1045645111 _1045905156 _1045990124 _1046002806 _1060082337 _1060602683 _1060602785 _1060602863 _1061195584 _1061195704 _1061195725 _1061195760 _1061195805 _1061211311 _1080473008 _1080544168 _1080562019 _1080562048@@@@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @ @@@@@@@?FZ`""E$N$J&S&((g(p()),,,,.&...%0.0 1199::L?V?=@?@@@AAAACCKKQQZW`W]]bbee1i7ijjglmlllrrrr-t2t]tbtuu-v2vowtwwwx$xy yByGy|}}} ֈ݈!* _fipejY_CI-3T] py09W]%ek gn|6=ip\c17w~,3OU^e-4&, TZrxouv      !"#$)'(*+,JS:@./DEMTnstz  lq!!##^%c%%%))**{++++----//N2T22344)5/555w6}6669999:::: <<==>%>BC]CiCCC EEbEhEoF{FGGHHFX`ֈ݈!*e]al!SU~ĘӘ&8J "/ip^i.9q}Q^X]Ĩ!%34FGYZlmlo|ȳĵp}ȷ8;IU/8eoCIms#"/o|)8ANwuz$/".JS]HP[bWZir$-dmLTim69  MT,esWZkt.<x~{  3 =   ###$(())1*;***++++j,,,,u////002222D3L333R5\5556 6O6X6r6}666:;K<[<o<r<??-@:@BBBC DqHyHfJnJLLOOR S SSSS,U0UUVzXXXXXXRYfYnZoZ$[X[``vv|}}3;@HBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSRC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\ROUND 3 - accuracy check\Chapter 14.docHBSHC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\FINAL CHAPTERS\Chapter 14.docHBSHC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\SolutionMnl\In Revision\FINAL CHAPTERS\Chapter 14.doc,K1of $f4 _ HHհ7c   !6@(3># 2 j8!@Z#Ky[<#ZPV&?C)d) pH-f $'-Ȝ[K`(/K0 &-2|BO@K~.E\ I0?z {Jp"@DpKaVOWTp"@[ Z %] ]^DpTKa  CaИOc #%d Ihf%Ri/)k  q ur s@B%Mwf $hBSy  |5CJo( |5CJo(- |5CJo(-. |5CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... 885CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  `5CJo(-......  5CJo(-....... hhOJQJo(hh5o(.|o(|o(-|o(-.|o(-.. 88o( -... 88o( -.... `o( -..... `o(-...... o(-.......hho(. hhOJQJo(hh^h`o(.o(.|o( |o(-|o(-.|o(-.. 88o( -... 88o( -.... `o( -..... `o(-...... o(-....... hhOJQJo(hho(. 05CJo( 05CJo(- 05CJo(-. 885CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... `5CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  5CJo(-......  5CJo(-....... |5CJo( |5CJo(- |5CJo(-. |5CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... 885CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  `5CJo(-......  5CJo(-.......0o(. 05CJo( 05CJo(- 05CJo(-. 05CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... 885CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  `5CJo(-......  5CJo(-.......++o(0o(-0o(-.88o(-.. 88o( -... `o( -.... `o( -..... o(-...... o(-.......hho(. hhOJQJo(o(. |5CJo( |5CJo(- |5CJo(-. |5CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... 885CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  `5CJo(-......  5CJo(-.......zo(.|o(|o(-|o(-.|o(-.. 88o( -... 88o( -.... `o( -..... `o(-...... o(-....... |5CJo( |5CJo(- |5CJo(-. |5CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... 885CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  `5CJo(-......  5CJo(-.......zo(.++o(0o(-0o(-.88o(-.. 88o( -... `o( -.... `o( -..... o(-...... o(-.......|o(|o(-|o(-.88o(-.. 88o( -... `o( -.... `o( -..... o(-...... ppo(-....... ]5CJo( ]5CJo(- 05CJo(-. 05CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... 885CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  `5CJo(-......  5CJo(-....... l5CJo( 05CJo(- 05CJo(-. 885CJo(-.. 885CJo( -... `5CJo( -.... `5CJo( -.....  5CJo(-......  5CJo(-.......|o(|o(-|o(-.88o(-.. 88o( -... `o( -.... `o( -..... o(-...... ppo(-.......hho(.hho()88o(.ko(.hho(. hhOJQJo(hho(.hho(.hhB*CJOJQJo(hho(.hh.hho(.0o(. hhOJQJo(hho(.,'-]^TKaSummaryInformation(<DocumentSummaryInformation8CdCompObjQjtery Cy C Normal.dotHBS3SMicrosoft Word 8.0@@@n!@q7: ՜.+,D՜.+,8 hp|   /1  CHAPTER 14 Title,(RZ _PID_GUID _PID_HLINKSAN{371B3052-DC2F-11D5-A1EE-8F4668EDD132}ApJ !http://www.investor.agilent.com/kp#http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/investor/WI!http://www.prenhall.com/horngren  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89qpH-1o%Mw[ Zkf_ K`(/O@-2Z# q@3>#T {JhBSy#%d%]V&)Oc2~.E0urj8!VOC) I CaHHDpK!Ric y[<#Ihs,@DDPDD?`@G:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial9Palatino;Wingdings"qhɳefe&ef7:!20d}D CHAPTER 14 My ComputerHBS