ࡱ > h k g < bjbj *x 3 8 8 C \ i 3 3 ( [ [ [ 6 6 6 a # 6 6 6 6 6 [ [ # 6 [ [ 6 [ R3L ~ 9 0 i # p # # 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 ` 6 6 6 i 6 6 6 6 # 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 : SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m.
Oral Argument: January 19, 2010 EN BANC
Bailiff: Sam Bacon/Andy Rottman
08SC1026 ( 1 HOUR)
Petitioners: Debora M. Palizzi; Gloria A. Bennett; and Palizzi & Son, Inc., a Colorado corporation; v. Respondent: City of Brighton, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado.))))))))))))))))))))))))))For the Petitioners:
Timothy J. Flanagan
Katherine T. Eubank Fowler Schimberg & Flanagan P.C.
For the Respondent:
Patrick Wilson
Special Counsel, City of Brighton
Murray Dahl Kuechenmeister &
Renaud LLP
and
Margaret R. Brubaker
City Attorney, City of Brighton
Mehaffy Brubaker & Ernst LLC
Amicus Curiae for Colorado Municipal League:
Erin E. Goff
Colorado Municipal League
Amicus Curiae for the Colorado Department of Transportation:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Megan Paris Rundlet
Assistant Attorney General
Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 07CA1343
Docketed: December 15, 2008
At Issue: December 21, 2009
ISSUE(S):
Whether the court of appeals erred when it held that, where dedication is required, evidence valuing the portion that would be dedicated as part of the whole parcel in accordance with the parcels potential future use as commercial property is inadmissible.
______________________________________________________________________________
Oral Argument: January 19, 2010 10:00 a.m.
EN BANC
08SC783 ( 1 HOUR)
Petitioner: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, by assignee, Ann W. Kopfman, v. Respondents: William Lynn Kopfman and Christine E. Kopfman.)))))))))))))))For the Petitioner:
Douglas W. Brown
David C. Walker Brown, Berardini & Dunning, P.C.
and
James M. Croshal James M. Croshal, Attorney at Law
For the Respondents:
James K. Lester Lester, Sigmond, Rooney & Schwiesow
and
Mark L. Fulford
Stephen A. Hess Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 07CA1059
Docketed: October 3, 2008
At Issue: October 20, 2009
ISSUE(S):
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a judgment creditor who has domesticated a foreign judgment and established a judgment lien on Colorado real property under section 13-52-102, C.R.S., (2008), must revive that judgment in the foreign court, re-domesticate that judgment, and record a new transcript of judgment issued by a Colorado court.
Whether the court of appeals erred in adopting a strict compliance standard for Colorados judgment lien and recording statutes and should have instead adopted a substantial compliance standard.
______________________________________________________________________________
SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m.
Oral Argument: January 20, 2010 EN BANC
Bailiff: Andra Zeppelin/Brock Swanson
08SC756 ( 1 HOUR)
Petitioner: Jose Pineda, v. Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado.)))))))))))For the Petitioner:
Douglas K. Wilson
Colorado State Public Defender
Nathaniel E. Deakins Deputy State Public Defender
For the Respondent:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Elizabeth F. Rohrbough
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 06CA157
Docketed: September 19, 2008
At Issue: December 16, 2009
ISSUE(S):
Whether, in light of the recently decided U.S. Supreme Court case Arizona v. Gant, No. 07-542 (U.S. April 21, 2009), the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial courts denial of a motion to suppress contraband found in Petitioners vehicle during a warrantless search incident to arrest conducted while Petitioner was handcuffed and secured in a police cruiser.
______________________________________________________________________________
Oral Argument: January 20, 2010 10:00 a.m.
EN BANC
09SC171 ( 1/2 HOUR)
Petitioner: Jaime J. Perez, v. Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado.)))))))))))))For the Petitioner:
Douglas K. Wilson
Colorado State Public Defender
Katherine Brien Deputy State Public Defender
Ned R. Jaeckle
Deputy State Public Defender
For the Respondent:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Rebecca A. Adams Assistant Attorney General
Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 07CA1746
Docketed: March 3, 2009
At Issue: October 9, 2009
ISSUE(S):
Whether the district court committed reversible error and violated petitioners constitutional rights by failing to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless search and seizure, and whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the judgment of conviction.
______________________________________________________________________________
SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m.
Oral Argument: January 21, 2010 EN BANC
Bailiff: Kate Field/Sara Rundell
08SC639 ( 1 HOUR)
Petitioners/Cross-Respondents: Cash Advance and Preferred Cash Loans, v. Respondents/Cross-Petitioners: State of Colorado, ex. rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General and Laura E. Udis, Administrator, Uniform Consumer Credit Code.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) )
)))))))))))))))))))))))))For the Petitioners/Cross-Respondents:
Edward T. Lyons Jr.
Thomas J. Burke Jr. Jones & Keller, P.C. and
Conly J. Schulte
Shilee T. Mullin
Frederick & Peebles, LLP
For the Respondents/Cross-Petitioners:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Daniel D. Domenico
Solicitor General
Jan M. Zavislan Deputy Attorney General Paul Chessin
Senior Assistant Attorney General
(filed a joint brief)
For Amicus Curiae the Colorado Indian Bar Association:
Jennifer H. Weddle Greenberg Traurig LLP
and
For Amicus Curiae the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe:
Peter J. Ortego Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe
and
For Amicus Curiae the University of Colorado School of Law American Indian Law Clinic:
Jill E. Tompkins
American Indian Law Clinic University of Colorado School of Law
and
For Amicus Curiae the American Indian Law Center, Inc.
Helen Padilla
American Indian Law Center, Inc.
contd on next page
08SC639
contd from previous page
Amicus Curiae for AARP, Center for Responsible Lending, Consumer Federation of America, National Association of Consumer Advocates, and National Consumer Law Center:
Rick Wynkoop
Wynkoop & Thomas P.C.
Amicus Curiae for the states of Iowa, Arkansas, New Mexico, Connecticut, Nebraska, Florida, Ohio, Idaho, South Dakota, Mississippi, Utah and National Association of Consumer Credit Administrators:
Thomas J. Miller
Iowa Attorney General
Jessica J. Whitney
Assistant Attorney General and
Deputy Administrator of the Iowa Consumer Credit CodeCertiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 2007CA582
Docketed: August 11, 2008
At Issue: December 18, 2009
ISSUE(S):
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding petitioners do not have tribal sovereign immunity from Colorado trial court orders compelling them to produce information regarding their eligibility for tribal sovereign immunity.
Whether the court of appeals contravened Congresss plenary power over Indian tribes by implementing its own test to determine if a tribes commercial enterprise is sufficiently connected to the tribe such that the enterprise is protected by tribal sovereign immunity.
Whether the court of appeals erred by stating that tribal officers are not protected by tribal sovereign immunity when acting outside state authority.
Whether the court of appeals erred by stating petitioners may have waived sovereign immunity against Colorados enforcement actions by including arbitration clauses in loan agreements with Colorado consumers.
contd on next page
08SC639
contd from previous page
Whether the court of appeals erred in reaching the question of sovereign immunity in an investigative subpoena enforcement proceeding.
Whether the court of appeals erred in allocating the burden of proof to the state when sovereign immunity is an affirmative defense, not a challenge to the courts subject matter jurisdiction.
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding the states burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence when the burden of proof in an investigative subpoena enforcement proceeding is cause to believe.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Oral Argument: Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:00 a.m.
EN BANC
09SA75 ( 1 HOUR)
Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company; Burlington Ditch, Reservoir and Land Company; Henrylyn Irrigation District; United Water and Sanitation District; and East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District in Adams, Arapahoe, Denver, Douglas, Elbert, Jefferson, and Weld Counties. Opposer-Appellant: City of Englewood, v. Applicants-Appellees: Burlington Ditch, Res. & Land Co.; Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Co.; United Water & Sanitation District; Henrylyn Irrigation District; and East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District; and Opposers-Appellees: Metro Wastewater Reclamation District; Public Service Company of Colorado; Town of Lochbuie; Platte Valley Irrigation Co.; City of Aurora; Golf Course Heritage Todd Creek; Todd Creek Farms Metro District; Centennial Water & Sanitation District; City of Boulder; Harmony Ditch Company; Irrigationists' Association; City of Thornton; State Board of Land Commissioners; Colorado Division of Wildlife; City of Blackhawk; City and County of Broomfield; City and County of Denver Water Board; City of Brighton; Lower Latham Reservoir Company; Aggregate Industries-WCR, Inc.; Albert Frei & Sons, Inc.; Henderson Aggregage Ltd; HP Farms, Inc.; PV Water Holdings, LLC; Adams County Board of Commissioners; Riverside Irrigation District; Riverside Land Co.; Brighton Ditch Company; Parker Water and Sanitation District; Platte Valley Irrigating & Milling Co.; Central Colorado Water Conservancy District; South Adams County Water & Sanitation District; Rangeview Metropolitan District; Equus Farms Inc.; State Water Engineer; Fulton Irrigation Ditch Co.; City of Greeley; Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District; Bijou Irrigation Company; Bijou Irrigation District; City of Commerce City; David Dechant; Consolidated Ditches Company of District No. 2; City of Sterling; and Arapahoe County Water & Wastewater; Appellee Pursuant to C.A.R. 1(e): James Hall, Division Engineer for Water Division No. 1.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))For the Opposer-Appellant City of Englewood:
David G. Hill
Jon N. Banashek
Heidi C. Potter Berg Hill Greenleaf & Ruscitti LLP
For Opposer-Appellee, the City and County of Denver:
Patricia L. Wells Casey S. Funk
Daniel J. Arnold
Michael Walker Denver Water Board
contd on next page
09SA75
contd from previous page
Appeal from District Court, Water Division 1, 04CW362, 02CW403, and 02CW105
Docketed: April 1, 2009
At Issue: November 5, 2009
ISSUE(S):
A. Did the Water Court err by interpreting a settlement agreement to be a lawful no-call
agreement where such agreement:
1. Enables the Beneficiary to gain on average approximately 7,400 acre-feet in gross diversions from an over-appropriated stream without replacement of depletions while the purportedly subordinated right suffers no diminution of its diversions because it remains the most senior storage right on the river;
2. Is designed to benefit only certain upstream rights and is, therefore, a selective subordination, which is void because it is contrary to public policy; and
3. Violates the one-fill rule on its face and in actual operation?
B. In regard to proof of injury as a result of the settlement agreement, did the water court err by:
1. Prohibiting the party claiming injury from relying on the presumption of injury on an over-appropriated stream, or providing such injury at trial and ignoring other evidence of injury; and
2. Determining that a stipulation at trial protected junior appropriators from injury?
__________________________________________________________________________
PAGE 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 3
Y ^ c q r } ~ A C E P
%
s
t
ɾԳԥԥzzozd h?r hp_ CJ aJ h~U! hAX CJ aJ h~U! hp_ CJ aJ h~U! hs 5CJ aJ h~U! hd 5CJ aJ h?r CJ aJ h~U! hs 5CJ \aJ h~U! h\} CJ aJ h~U! h CJ aJ h~U! hB CJ aJ h~U! hs CJ aJ h~U! hd& CJ aJ h~U! h4] CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ % c
%
4
V
t
$If ^ $If gdp_ $If gdAX $If
&d P
#
&d P gd\}
* + i y + X kd $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al $If gd?r $If gdAX
+ i * - 5 8 :
}rg h~U! h4] CJ aJ h~U! hB CJ aJ h~U! hd& CJ aJ h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hp| >*CJ aJ h~U! hp_ CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! h?r CJ aJ h?r CJ aJ h?r h?r 5CJ aJ h?r h?r B*CJ aJ ph h?r h?r 5B*CJ aJ ph h?r h?r CJ aJ "+ , - 7 8 :
Q R g $If gdGW $If gdX1 $If
&d P
$ gdp_ + s u w Q R d e g , 6 G J R T U ~ - . / 1 2 3 7 E F P Q R V l ܹܹܹܭܹܹܹܹt h~U! hB CJ aJ h~U! hd& CJ aJ h~U! h4] CJ aJ h~U! h >*CJ aJ h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hp| >*CJ aJ h~U! h CJ aJ h~U! hp_ 5CJ aJ h~U! hd 5CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! hp_ CJ aJ h~U! hp_ 5CJ \aJ - - H I J T U ~
$*$gd X kdz $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al
$If ^ $If gdX1 $If gdGW 7 ~ + = \ $If gdW0 $If gdJO $If
&d P
$*$gd l v
* + , 3 > Q [ m p x z { ; = > B P Q [ \ ] a w ꮢ꺀 h~U! hB CJ aJ h~U! hd& CJ aJ h~U! hjj >*CJ aJ h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hp| >*CJ aJ h~U! hjj CJ aJ h~U! hW0 CJ aJ h~U! hd 5CJ aJ h~U! h 5CJ \aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! h CJ aJ 0 4 R n o p z { < *$gdjj X kd $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al
$If ^ gd $If gdW0 < = > ? @ A * 8 L ^ ~
9 $If gdx $If gd/ $If
&d P w y ) 5 7 8 K L } ~ 9 : h p { ߽ɟ߽߉߉߉}q h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hp| >*CJ aJ h~U! h CJ aJ h~U! h CJ aJ h~U! hO~9 CJ aJ hjj CJ aJ h~U! hJO CJ aJ h~U! hd 5CJ aJ hO~9 CJ aJ h~U! hjj 5CJ \aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! hjj CJ aJ h~U! h4] CJ aJ )9 : ; q gdGW X kdn $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al
$If ^ t z { | ? A C a B Y Z l ƻѰѥѥѥѥѥѥьссym h~U! hd 5CJ aJ h< CJ aJ h~U! hM& CJ aJ h~U! hx 5CJ \aJ h~U! h~U! CJ aJ h~U! hx CJ aJ h~U! hd& CJ aJ h~U! hC CJ aJ h~U! h4] CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hGW CJ aJ h~U! h >*CJ aJ & @ Z
$If ^ $If gdM& $If gd, $If gd< $If
&d P l % ' ; > ? m _ b c !
! @! }! ! ! R" x" =# # # # Ѯyn h~U! h<* CJ aJ h~U! h/ CJ aJ h~U! h~U! CJ aJ h<* CJ aJ h~U! h0i CJ aJ h~U! h0i 5CJ aJ h0i CJ aJ h~U! h?r CJ aJ h?r CJ aJ hM& CJ aJ h~U! hM& CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! hd 5CJ aJ h~U! hM& 5CJ aJ ' ' 7 H [ m ; ? m _ c
! H! $If gd0i $If gd/ $If gd?r $If gdM& $If gdN( H! }! ! S" a" w" x" =# N# d# w# # # # z X kd $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al
$If ^gd<*
$If ^ gdM& $If gdM& $If gd?r
# # # # # # # # $ $ $$ .$ @$ A$ G$ H$ P$ R$ S$ & & ' ' ' ' ' ) 9+ + + + + + + + + + + uj_ h~U! hC CJ aJ h~U! hB CJ aJ h~U! hd& CJ aJ h~U! h~U! CJ aJ h~U! h<* CJ aJ h~U! h, >*CJ aJ h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hp| >*CJ aJ h~U! h, CJ aJ h~U! hM& 5CJ aJ h~U! hM& CJ aJ h~U! hN( 5CJ \aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! hN( CJ aJ %# # # # #
$ %$ A$ H$ R$ S$ 6% 7% D& E& & & gd, X kdb $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al
$If ^ $If & ' ' ' ' ' ' ( ( ) ) ) ) ) g* h* 9+ + + + + + + , 0, 1, 2,
&d P `gd<* gd, gd~U! + + + + + + 2, 9, =, >, G, - - - - - - . . . . 3 3 04 B4 H4 ^4 b4 v4 w4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 *5 5 5 5 6 6 47 ?7 Իw hQ hk_ 5CJ aJ hQ hd 5CJ aJ h~U! hk_ 5CJ aJ h 5CJ aJ h~U! hd 5CJ aJ h~U! h~U! CJ aJ h~U! hk_ CJ aJ h~U! h, 5CJ \aJ h~U! h, CJ aJ h~U! hC CJ aJ h~U! h4] CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ ,2, F, G, 14 w4 4 4 4 4 4 ,5 M5 ^5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 $If gdk_ $If 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 r6 6 6 6 6 $If gdk_ 6 6 6 57 M7 h7 i7 s7 t7 7 7 7 '9 (9 9 9 : h^hgd* gd* gdk_ X kd $$If l F Z$ Z h : 4
l al ?7 L7 V7 g7 i7 q7 s7 t7 7 7 : : 7; 8; 9; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
< < ꏋ{p{ldld j h6> Uh6> h6> 0J mH nH u
h6> 0J j h6> 0J Uh4 j h4 Uh
CJ aJ h~U! h
CJ aJ h* CJ aJ h~U! h* >*CJ aJ h CJ aJ h~U! h~U! >*CJ aJ h~U! hd >*CJ aJ h~U! hp| >*CJ aJ h~U! hd CJ aJ h~U! h* CJ aJ #: : v: x: 8; 9; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; < < < < $a$ h]h &`#$ h^hgd
h^hgd*
Z ^Z gd* Z ^Z gd* < < < < < < h~U! hd CJ aJ h4 h6> j h6> Uh mH nH u < < h^hgd
( / =!"#&$&% x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al x $$If l !v h5 Z5h5:#v Z#vh#v::V l 5 Z5h5:4 al ^ 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 v v v v v v v v v 6 6 6 6 6 6 > 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 h H 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 0 @ P ` p 2 ( 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 8 X V ~ _HmH nH sH tH 8 ` 8 N o r m a l _HmH sH tH D A` D D e f a u l t P a r a g r a p h F o n t V i@ V T a b l e N o r m a l :V 4 4
l a ( k ( N o L i s t > B > B o d y T e x t
Z B*CJ 4 @ 4 0 F o o t e r
! . )@ . P a g e N u m b e r 4 "4
z 0 H e a d e r
H$ . 1. z 0 H e a d e r C h a r . A.
0 F o o t e r C h a r PK ! [Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi} ;~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭? PK ! ֧ 6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/} (h"O
= C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_ 6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/Se е PK ! ky theme/theme/themeManager.xml M
@}w7c(Ebˮ CAǠҟ7՛K
Y,
e.|,H ,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+&
8 PK ! P theme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-Mn iP@I}úama[إ4:l ЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@ /yH*)UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSe bORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`j zA V2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXd sjcs7f
W+Ն7` g ȘJj|h(KD-
dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E ??ZBΪmU/ ?~xY'y5g&/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K )fw 9:ĵ
x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI
u3KGnD 1NIBs
RuK>V.E L+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8z H
* :( W ☕
~JTe\O*tHGHY }KNP*ݾ˦ TѼ9/#A7qZ $*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP
1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g-
eW
)6-rC Sj
id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q% p%m&]caS l=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f
Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ .uχYC6OMf3or$5N HT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R 3U~7+#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vp IYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07% < ҍ PK !
ѐ ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM
0wooӺ&݈Э5
6?$Q
,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{ P8g/ ]QAsم(#L[ PK- ! [Content_Types].xmlPK- ! ֧ 6 + _rels/.relsPK- ! ky theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK- ! P theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK- !
ѐ ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK ]
4 x 7 7 7 :
l w l # + ?7 < < " $ ' * , . 1 4 8 :
+ < 9 H! # & 2, 5 6 : < < ! # % & ( ) + - / 0 2 3 5 6 7 9 ; 1 3 : !t! 8 @ 0 (
B
S ? b p t z q x i p ' . 8 ? i p / 6 R Z t | / 6 w } Y ` a h $ $ % % % % I& Q& & & ' ' ' ' ( ) ) ") k* t* * * b+ i+ + + , , , , , , , - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 b * +
6 7 C E ! ! ! f" "
# 3$ <$ / / / / / / W2 ]2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 7 h h Y Y ; > _ H H ! ! 9# 9# , , - - - - . . . . . . h/ h/ r/ s/ / / / / 73 83 93 93 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 7 h h Y Y ; > _ H H ! ! 9# 9# , , - - - - . . . . . . h/ h/ r/ s/ / / / / 73 83 93 93 3 3 3 4 ? > , d&
s 4 d * ~U! X% M& <* O~9 < 6> #RG JO *Q *W GW 4] k_ 0i jj ?r 7u tZv \{ p| \} X1 AX W0 2y B d { )
a p_ x qR 8 / N(
Q hJ fu z Y , C N 3 3 @ 4 @ U n k n o w n G * T i m e s N e w R o m a n 5 S y m b o l 3. * A r i a l A B C a m b r i a M a t h " 1 h ٱFFF
, ^ , ^ ! 4 d 3 3 2q HX ? d 2 ! x x S U P R E M E C O U R T , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O C o u r t s B 0 0 0 M B Oh +'0 ,
L X d
p | $ SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO Courts Normal B000MB 12 Microsoft Office Word @ (% @ _=@ @ h.L , ՜. +,0 h p
Colo Judicial Dept ^ 3 ! SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO Title
! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < > ? @ A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V X Y Z [ \ ] ^ ` a b c d e f i j m R o o t E n t r y F ALl D a t a
= 1 T a b l e E # W o r d D o c u m e n t
*x S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n ( W D o c u m e n t S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n 8 _ M s o D a t a S t o r e 0LR3L U C R K J C 5 P = = 2 0LR3L I t e m
P r o p e r t i e s U C o m p O b j
y
F' Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document
MSWordDoc Word.Document.8 9q