ࡱ> )+(W  bjbjyy )l =$3 S @; 0= SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1NORMS FOR MINI-MARKER SCALES (Saucier, 1994) I II III IV V _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Expressed in terms of mean rating scale units 9-point rating scales SELF RATINGS 1125 residents 5.70 (1.31) 7.32 (0.86) 6.74 (1.12) 5.79 (1.18) 6.55 (1.09) 360 students 5.92 (1.46) 7.18 (1.09) 6.24 (1.23) 4.83 (1.20) 6.65 (1.10) RATINGS OF A LIKED PEER 329 students 6.19 (1.44) 6.53 (1.43) 5.79 (1.31) 4.90 (1.18) 6.22 (1.23) 7-point rating scales SELF RATINGS 320 students 4.31 (0.91) 5.52 (0.69) 4.95 (0.87) 3.81 (0.84) 5.10 (0.78) RATINGS OF A LIKED PEER 316 students 4.93 (0.99) 5.52 (0.83) 4.90 (1.01) 4.30 (0.89) 5.19 (0.78) Expressed as percentage of maximum possible score SELF RATINGS 1125 residents 58.79 (16.35) 78.95 (10.77) 71.73 (13.98) 59.85 (14.75) 69.42 (13.61) 360 students 61.54 (18.19) 77.27 (13.62) 65.55 (15.42) 47.86 (15.04) 70.68 (13.71) 320 students 55.22 (15.21) 75.34 (11.54) 65.78 (14.51) 46.75 (13.99) 68.30 (12.96) RATINGS OF A LIKED PEER 329 students 64.93 (18.00) 69.17 (17.90) 59.90 (16.43) 48.79 (14.80) 65.24 (15.39) 316 students 65.50 (16.42) 75.31 (13.80) 64.92 (16.84) 54.93 (14.84) 69.87 (12.98) _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Note. Standard deviations in parentheses. All values based on average item scores after reverse-keyed items reflected. Conversion of rating scale scores to percentage of maximum possible score is by formulae: (for mean) P = 100[(M-L)/R] and (for standard deviation) P = 100(S/R), where P is percentage, M is mean, S is standard deviation, L is value of lowest point on the rating scale, and R is difference between maximum and minimum value on rating scale. Samples are 1125 community residents of Eugene-Springfield, Oregon, 1993; 360 and 329 students at Eastern Illinois University, 1993; and 320 and 316 students at University of Oregon, 1978. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516. 2,A :~ W [ f o e 5CJOJQJ CJOJQJ>*CJOJQJj>*CJOJQJUCD^"r+,BCP ;<IJ$1$a$ JKc } ~  $01$^`0a$$1$a$'0= /!"#$% i4@4 NormalCJ_HmH sH tH <A@< Default Paragraph Font J   Corel CorporationGerardS/C:\Program Files\Claris Corp\pages\MINIMARK.doc@tP@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial?5 z Courier New#cT&cT&?!2,NORMS FOR MINI-MARKER SCALES (Saucier, 1994)GerardSGerardSOh+'0 $ @ L X dpx-NORMS FOR MINI-MARKER SCALES (Saucier, 1994)9.0ORMGerardSeraNormalGerardS2raMicrosoft Word 9.0E@@*I6@R@R?՜.+,0, hp  Department of PsychologyR -NORMS FOR MINI-MARKER SCALES (Saucier, 1994) Title !"#$%&'*Root Entry F 6Ҿ,1TableWordDocument)SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8 CompObjjObjectPool 6Ҿ 6Ҿ  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q