аЯрЁБс;ўџ :ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ§џџџџџџџўџџџ ўџџџ  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789ўџџџ;ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџўџџџўџџџ  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ўџџџBCDўџџџFўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word-Dokument MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq [\ёџ\Default 1$*$A$/B*OJQJCJsH sH PJnH^JaJ_HtH.ўђџё. WW8Num1z0 OJQJ^J.ўђџ. WW8Num1z1 OJQJ^J.ўђџ. WW8Num2z0 OJQJ^J.ўђџ!. WW8Num2z1 OJQJ^J<ўђџ1<Default Paragraph Font.ўђџA.BulletsOJQJPJ^JFўbFHeading Є№Єx$OJQJCJPJ^JaJ.Bb. Text body ЄЄx /ar List^J@ў‚@Caption ЄxЄx $CJ6^JaJ]&ў’&Index $^J@ўЂ@ Balloon TextOJQJCJ^JaJ. В.Footer ЦрР! $іZџџџџ(+ьG$%Р~ И.(29,:ьG&'()*+,џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ^„а`„˜ўЦаOJQJ^JЗ№ ^„8`„˜ўЦ8OJQJ^Jц% ^„ `„˜ўЦ OJQJ^JЊ% ^„`„˜ўЦOJQJ^JЗ№ ^„p`„˜ўЦpOJQJ^Jц% ^„и `„˜ўЦи OJQJ^JЊ% ^„@ `„˜ўЦ@ OJQJ^JЗ№ ^„Ј `„˜ўЦЈ OJQJ^Jц% ^„`„˜ўЦOJQJ^JЊ% ^„а`„˜ўЦаOJQJ^JЗ№ ^„8`„˜ўЦ8OJQJ^Jц% ^„ `„˜ўЦ OJQJ^JЊ% ^„`„˜ўЦOJQJ^JЗ№ ^„p`„˜ўЦpOJQJ^Jц% ^„и `„˜ўЦи OJQJ^JЊ% ^„@ `„˜ўЦ@ OJQJ^JЗ№ ^„Ј `„˜ўЦЈ OJQJ^Jц% ^„`„˜ўЦOJQJ^JЊ%џ^„А`„PўЦАџ^„@`„Р§Ц@џ^„а`„0§Цаџ^„``„ ќЦ`џ^„№`„ќЦ№џ^„€`„€ћЦ€џ^„`„№њЦџ^„ `„`њЦ џ^„0`„аљЦ0џџџџџџџџџџџџџџWW8Num1WW8Num2џ@ііP GTimes New Roman5Symbol3&Arial5Symbol_€ OpenSymbolArial Unicode MSGMicrosoft YaHei5Mangal5€Mangal5&TahomaBаhЙ;е† жFCCGпn9ƒ9пn99'№0№м0€џџ  ўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Р PXdx „  œ Ј Дщ§  Normal.dot 11@И"L@€ѓpCwyб@F!gЯЩ@b-?ОуЩўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎ\щ§щ§ьЅM П0ьGCaolan80 2Zіџџ$џџ&џџˆ222F4zŽ< 6^ З b.l ЪVі @6 (` й TIMBER INVENTORY AND VALUATION FOR TIMBERLOCK RANCH Mendocino County, California Darcie Mahoney, Lic. No. 2397 30995 Greenwood Road, Elk, CA 95432 707-877-3435 March 8, 2016 Background California Department of Forestry records show harvesting of the property occurred in the mid to late 1970's, with the most recent harvest occurring under a transition method cut in 1993 (1-93-465MEN). A Fire Hazard Reduction Exemption permit (1-97EX-118MEN) was also conducted around the residence and cabin in 1997. The Kapczynski family purchased the property in 2000, and commissioned a Non-Industrial Timber Management Plan (1-10NTMP-007MEN) by Darcie Mahoney. In 2007/2008, under the direction of Pacific Watershed Associates, Inc., major erosion control prevention treatments were conducted. Inventory Method Able and Associates conducted a timber inventory in 1995, with a net volume of 2,663,990 BF. Darcie Mahoney conducted an inventory in 2006, with additional plots sampled in 2010. Seventy-two 1/5th acre plots were measured within the property on a systematic grid. Within each plot, all conifers 8 dbh and greater and all hardwoods 4 and greater were tallied. Conifers were measured for diameter, height, visible defect and merchantability. Heights were measured ocularly and checked with a clinometer in 16' log lengths to a 6 top. Heights for hardwoods were estimated to a 4 top. Diameters were measured with a diameter tape and Biltmore stick. Net timber volume was obtained after subtracting defect and estimates for hidden defect and anticipated breakage during logging. Growth was measured with an increment corer. Conifer volumes are presented in net Scriner Short Log Scale Rule. Net inventory in 2010 was 4,302,160 BF, with redwood volume comprising 74% of the net, and Douglas-fir 26%. Growth averaged about 4%. To determine conifer volumes for 2016, the volumes listed in the NTMP were  grown at 4% from 2010. 2016 Inventory Results (in Board Feet Scribner) Redwood 3,954,175 Douglas-fir 1,380,520 Total 5,334,695* *Total Volume on 329 acres Based on stream protection zone and northern spotted owl territory harvest restrictions, along with isolated understocked areas, the following timber valuation is based on 314 operational acres. Timber Valuation Timber valuations have been complicated since the downturn of the economy in 2008, since inflation has been close to zero, and logging prices have gone up while timber prices have gone down. Today's managed standing timber volumes generate a higher interest percentage (growth) than that generally paid by banks. Valuations are best estimates based on this moment in time and expectations of how the economy might move forward in the future based on past experience of the forester. The long term trend has been an increase in value of timber. Following are two valuation scenarios below based on two differing management methods. The assumptions for which the valuations are based are listed at the end of this document. Harvest and Valuation Scenario 1 NTMP's provide a scenario in which harvest volumes are kept below growth until the property achieves what is estimated as its maximum productive capability. This ensures a flow of income each decade from the property while increasing the inventory until it reaches a sustainable rate of harvest throughout time. The NTMP developed for Timberlock Ranch recommends a 20% harvest (harvesting at a rate below growth) each decade until the property achieves what the forester believes is a  sustainable harvest level based on the soil types underlying the property. Harvest is never to exceed growth. The harvest scenario utilizing the NTMP is provided below and represents three entries over twenty years, twenty years being a commonly-desired investment payback period. Year 2016 2026 2036 Preharvest vol. 4,574,770 5,108,175 5,516,830 (on 314 acres) Harvest vol. 790,935* 1,021,635 1,103,365 *No cable harvest of Douglas-fir the first entry Post-harvest vol. 3,783,835 4,086,540 4,413,465 Growth, next 10 yrs. 1,324,340 1,430,290 1,544,710 Avg. Stumpage ($/MBF) $354 $391 $432 Revenue per decade $279,990 $399,460 $476,655 The total revenue = $1,156,105 in 20 years. (Income generated in 2026 and 2036 could be discounted back to today's dollars using the investor's personal discount rate). Note that the timber inventory has increased in this harvest scenario. Within the NTMP is the California Department of Forestry  Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculator , which is an accounting of carbon emissions and sequestration of carbon dioxide over 90 years of harvest entries. Under Harvest Scenario 1, which follows the silvicultural prescription of the NTMP, it is estimated that within two years after the initial harvest, that carbon stocks are recouped. Therefore, Harvest Scenario 1 could be approved for a carbon sequestration project. Harvest Value Scenario 2 This scenario assumes a one-time harvest of 50% of the available volume on 314 acres (2,287,380 BF), which I believe would be the maximum amount that could be harvested under the Forest Practice Rules, based on current basal area levels. This scenario would harvest more than growth, and no further harvesting would likely be possible in the 20-year investment payback period. The NTMP would not be able to be utilized, and a Timber Harvest Plan would need to be filed and approved. The assumptions in calculating Scenario 2 are shown on the next page. The timber value under this scenario is $841,885. Summary As can be see from the two scenarios, Harvest Value Scenario 1 retains inventory and provides more income over time than Scenario 2. This timber value estimate may differ from those made by others utilizing different assumptions in logging costs, product utilization, sampling procedures, and mill prices, among other variables. The estimate reflects my experience with past harvesting projects. It must be kept in mind that future inflation, changes in logging costs and timber prices, and new Forest Practice Rules could all have an appreciable effect on this current valuation of timber. Darcie Mahoney Licensed Forester #2397 March 8, 2016 Assumptions for Harvest Scenarios Harvest Scenario 1 20% of the volume is removed per decade, with no harvest of Douglas-fir on cable ground during the first entry due to cost of removal; with the harvest focussed on  thinning from below , leaving the best trees to grow. the average annual growth rate is 3.5% of the standing inventory stumpage values (average value of redwood and Douglas-fir after consideration of all costs) increase 1% annually. (The forester considers this to be a conservative value for redwood price increases over time while indicating a positive net for Douglas-fir over time). the 2016 average stumpage price of $354 is based on 2015 mill prices received by the forester (and that no Douglas-fir cable volume is removed due to cost of removal at this moment in time) costs include logging ($240/MBF tractor; $320/MBF cable; trucking cost is $73/MBF; forestry administration is estimated at $20,000; and timber tax was calcu-lated from the latest Board of Equalization harvest value schedule (through December 2015) the operable acreage is 314 acres (due to stream zone and northern spotted owl restrictions and understocked areas). Because the Timberlock Ranch NTMP requires sustainable harvesting through time, I am basing this valuation on the amount of harvesting that could likely occur under the NTMP over the next two decades, which approximates an investor's commonly-desired investment payback period. Harvest Scenario 2 50% of volume is removed on 314 acres the same mill prices and trucking cost as above costs for logging is assumed to be cheaper due to more volume available: tractor cost is estimated at $190/MBF, and cable at $260 cost of a new timber harvest plan and administration of logging is estimated at $30,000 timber tax is estimated as noted above   T\~ИМОРТФЦШЪЬЮавджикмортА Ъ Ю а в д ж и к м о ђ ЊЪTXДИ hŠ6 : < | „&ˆ&М&Р&6'T'X'Ъ',( (Є())n)r)а)д)(*$+(+§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§љ§§§§§§§§§§§ї§§§§љљљѓљюющщююююююююююсмж CJ5aJCJaJCJ5aJ\CJaJCJaJ5\H*5\5Q(+p/t/x/Ј/4h4l4n4|4†5Š5œ7$9(9*9,9.90929N9~9š9ž9 9Ђ9Є9І9Ј9Њ9Ќ9Ў9А9В9Д9Ж9И9К9М9О9::(:,:ф;h<‚>ў?юAмBE EE2E6E€EрEфF–GцGъGьGјі№шјшффрјіфј№№№№№№јјјфіііііііііііііііі№№№№№№№№№№№і№№№№№№№іі5\5\CJ5aJ\ CJ5aJ5CJ5aJ\=  V^€КМОРњѕ№ыцсмзвЭШУОЙДЏЊЅ$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$РТФЦШЪЬЮавджикморт* ~ њѕ№ыцсмзвЭШУОЙДЏЊЈІ$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$~ Є Ь Ю а в д ж и к м о є r t ЈЊЬшъЖИ§ћіёьчтнигЮЬЪШЦФТРОМК$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$$a$И JL~€ЈЊтфjŒ8 : ~ †&ˆ&О&Р&8'V'X'Ь'.(§ћљїѕѓёяэыщчхуспнлйзегбЯ.(Ђ(Є())p)r)в)д)r/t/Њ/j4l4n4~4ˆ5Š5&9(9*9,9.90929§ћљїѕѓёяэыщчхуспнлйзегбЯ29P9€9œ9ž9 9Ђ9Є9І9Ј9Њ9Ќ9Ў9А9В9Д9Ж9И9К9М9О9::*:,:§ћљїѕѓёяэыщчхуспнлйзегбЯ,:ц;j<„>@№AоB E EE4E6E‚EтEцF˜GшGъGьGњњњњњњњјієђэээээшу$a$$a$ & F & F0Аа/ Ар=!А"А# $ 2P1h0p3P(20Root Entryџџџџџџџџ РFРCompObjџџџџjOle џџџџџџџџ1TableџџџџџџџџџџџџGSummaryInformation(џџџџA№WordDocumentџџџџџџџџџџџџ 2ZDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџEtџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџ