ࡱ> |~{#` Xbjbj\.\. 4>D>DP08d\L,82^(:::7777777$^9h;7"""7::7$'$'$'"::7$'"7$'$'4h 6: I#C$75770,8G5`<%`< 6`< 6N$'7 C 77&,8""""$ AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements (JTCP) December 6-8, 2006 DRAFT Meeting Minutes Welcome and introductory comments - Malcolm T. Kerley, P.E., Chief Engineer, Virginia DOT Mr. Kerley was introduced to the JTCP by Andy Mergenmeier. In Mr. Kerleys welcoming remarks he acknowledged that Virginia is encountering challenges and issues similar to those that are being put before many other States in a shifting political environment. One of the key areas VDOT is working on currently to leverage resources and meet the transportation needs is public private partnerships (under the Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) Guidelines). Under the PPTA there have been a number projects that bring approaches for private entities to construct, improve, maintain, and operate transportation facilities including approaches such as the use of HOT lanes. Update on Continuing Resolution - John D Angelo John provided information on the pavement and materials research, development, and technology deployment programs that are planned under the SAFETEA-LU legislation. This included a summary of designated programs and earmarks along with anticipated funding levels and 2007 appropriations. Long Life Concrete Pavement Scan Update - Dan Dawood The presentation provided a summary of the 2006 scan cosponsored by AASHTO, FHWA, and NCHRP to identify techniques used in other countries for achieving longer concrete pavement service lives. There are several findings that the scan team will recommend implementing in the U.S. A final scan report will be published in 2007. Quality Assurance Reviews - John DAngelo Presentation was an overview of the FHWA Quality Assurance Program including background information, current status and resources, and goals for the short term and long term. NCHRP 1-40 Overview and Status Harold Von Quintus Presentation provided an introduction and overview of the 1-40 project, status of project phases, an overview of findings, along with a summary and concluding comments. For balloting purposes, the User Manual will be the product that will be voted on therefore the User Manual is in an AASHTO format (like the Standard Practice type of publications). The project team is trying to follow the objective to limit the User Manual to 100 pages, however it is already about 140 pages long. The manual includes information on semi-rigid pavements (asphalt over cementitious base). Calibration is still needed although some calibration for the northwest has been done. There may be a need to deal with the reliability concept and input levels. The User Manual mentions the issue and provides suggestions for initial ways to work around it. The User Manual notes cautions about areas that have a low R2 (like longitudinal cracking). This should be discussed at the NCHRP 1-40 Panel meeting on 12/11/07. The User Manual will mention that pavement preservation treatments are not directly included in the mechanistic empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG). This issue could be considered in the local calibration guide, but not in this User Manual for reasons such as: Pavement preservation is not a structural design Should be addressed in pavement management JTCP could consider looking at a Joint Task Force document that was produced/approved in a previous year to cover this subject. JTCP should provide direction on how to proceed based on the upcoming NCHRP 1-40 Panel meeting (12/11/06) through the end of the project. Do States still need to review the manual or should it be taken to the ballot stage? State comments and JTCPs comments should be addressed. Mr. Von Quintus suggested that the April workshop will provide one venue for States to review the User Manual since it is expected that each State will send a representative. The workshop and balloting process were discussed again several times throughout the meeting. Alternate Bid and Adjustment Factors Pete Stephanos and Kirk Zeringue Kirk presented information on the alternate design / alternate bids in Louisiana including some background information, the evolution of the process along with information on its current use. Pete presented information on use of alternate bids and pavement type selection in Maryland along with why it changed, how it changed, and how well it is working. There was also some information presented on alternate bid experience reported by Ontario and Missouri. In addition to the presentations, a report from Wisconsin DOT entitled Asphalt and Concrete Pavement Letting through Alternate Pavement Type Bidding was provided. (also available on  HYPERLINK "http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/library/research/docs/tsrs/tsrasphaltconcrete.pdf" http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/library/research/docs/tsrs/tsrasphaltconcrete.pdf) Also referenced in the presentation was publication FHWA-SA-98-079 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - Interim Technical Bulletin. (Also available on  HYPERLINK "http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/013017.pdf" http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/013017.pdf) Louisianas process is described in Transportation Research Record No. 1900, Construction 2004 in a paper entitled Agency Process for Alternate Design and Alternate Bid of Pavements. A suggestion was made that FHWA should prepare a Technical Advisory to clarify Alternate Design and Alternate Bid. Currently the policy is that State will have a procedure for pavement design. Alternate bids are discouraged (but not prohibited). If State agency wants to have alternate bids, need to do a Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA). Discussion: Questionnaire for States Gary Sharpe Gary (859-744-1218) provided an Innovative Contracting Methods Questionnaire for State representatives to complete and return to Gary at the address provided on the questionnaire. AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials Andy Mergenmeier The Subcommittee on Materials (SOM) will be presented with the option to vote on a provisional pavement design guide. It is expected that this will be done by a special vote after information is presented to the SOM meeting in August 2007. NCHRP Pavement Research Overview Amir Hanna The presentation included background information and the current status of research project in the NCHRP program. A List of Current and Recently Completed Projects Related to Pavements was handed out to the JTCP as a summary projects. The JTCPs business plan is published as an October 2003 NCHRP Research Results Digest 276 entitled Business Needs for Pavement Engineering (available on  HYPERLINK "http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_276.pdf" http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_276.pdf ). It was suggested that a business meeting is needed to update the plan and to discuss the topics and subtopics. Project 1-43 is completed, Guide for Pavement Friction. NCHRP is looking for a recommendation from the JTCP to publish this as an AASHTO guide. (Motion was made to ballot this, see item 21) Discussion: forming a strategic planning steering committee - Cheryl Richter A discussion took place on forming a steering committee to begin putting together a strategic plan for the next pavement design guide. The intent is to begin planning needed research. The steering committee would determine how far out to look (i.e. whether to pursue next version of the MEPDG or perhaps what a next generation of a pavement design guide should look like). The committee would consider all the research that has been done and look forward for opportunities. Questions to the JTCP: Is the time right? What timeframe would be needed for this type of plan? There was some debate whether this should be a parallel activity to the current pavement design guide implementation efforts, or follow on activity once implementation is fully underway. There was concern as to focusing energy on the task at hand (implementation) rather than to looking at a new strategic plan. However, a strategic plan at this stage may assist in providing some direction for research that is already in progress and may also assist States in their decisions about the current guide if there is information about when potential shortcomings of the current guide will be addressed. If the JTCP agrees that strategic planning for the next guide should begin, it is suggested that JTCP members are identified to work on a steering committee brought together by FHWA. Lead States Group Update Linda Pierce There are several Tech Notes/Briefs on the design guide being prepared and made available from FHWA. The group may need to have its efforts and role redirected. States should be providing information and reports on implementation efforts to the group to support the distribution of experience and success stories. DARWIN Task Group (Software issues) Linda Pierce and Tony Bianchi The DARWIN task group is waiting for the release of MEPDG 1.0 version of software and approval in order to sunset DARWIN to put funding into the new software. Licensing and fees would provide the funding to the MEPDG forward. Could consider different licensing models already used for other AASHTO software (like PONTIS). The task group will decide on the fee (probably not more than $25,000) and will need to have a minimum 10 States buying a license in order to move forward on having it as an AASHTOware product. The group anticipates that an annual user license will be purchased by States which would include the source code (for States ONLY). In this way, States can make modifications and submit the changes back to the task group for evaluation. The task group would consider whether to incorporate the changes into the software. The feedback and use of the States modifications would likely involve AASHTO and the State signing agreements to deal with intellectual property issues. Other organizations and consultants would be able to purchase a license, but would not receive the source code. The task force expects to have a meeting in March 2007 to discuss these issues, perhaps in association with the planned workshop. Design Guide Implementation Team (DGIT) Gary Crawford The presentation provided a summary of the DGIT including the implementation strategies and activities that have taken place and others that are planned as the next steps. There was a suggestion to DGIT from one of the JTCP members to sort or organize the comments that are in the online Community of Practice to make it easier to find discussions on specific topics. There was a concern over continuing to refer to the product as the Pavement Design Guide since it will be provisional. There was some discussion on how a State actually implements the guide. It was suggested that a structured template from a business perspective (a kind of architecture for implementation) would be helpful. The FHWA indicated that they have received some implementation plans and will check with the States that submitted them to verify that it would be acceptable to share the plans including the specifics. AASHTO Update Keith Platte Keith introduced himself as the new AASHTO liaison to the JTCP and intends to support the committee as needed. Updates to the AASHTO JTCP webpage (http://design.transportation.org/?siteid=59&pageid=762) can be made through Keith. The presentations from this meeting will be posted on the technical committees webpage ( HYPERLINK "http://design.transportation.org/?siteid=59&pageid=1961" http://design.transportation.org/?siteid=59&pageid=1961) rather than on an FTP site used in the past. ACPA Update Gerry Voigt Gerrys presentation included the concrete industries thoughts on MEPDG, the ACPA boards adopted position on performance related specifications, and concrete program highlights. ACPA has some concerns with the CRC models (in MEPDG) however this should not prevent things from moving forward. ACPA proposes incorporating MEPDG into PaveSpec in the future. A handout was provided outlining ACPAs position on performance related specifications. The issue of alternate bids may also be presented to the industry (ACPA) technical task force. There was a discussion about ACPAs new website. JTCP members expressed concerns over the content and information presented on the site. ACPA plans to review and modify the site and specific comments can be submitted directly to Gerry. The JTCP plans to allow time for ACPA to modify the website prior to deciding on taking any other action. Dan will email Gerry to ask about ACPAs timeframe for review/changes and relay the response to the JTCP and Chairs of SOD and SOM. Warm Mix Asphalt Scan Update - John DAngelo The presentation included an overview of warm mix asphalt (WMA), the scan purpose, and some of the preliminary details on coordination. This is a Joint AASHTO/ FHWA/NCHRP International Technology Scan on WMA technology planned for 2007. The scan will include taking a look at incorporating more recycled material into the mix and whether using the technology can extend the construction season. NCHRP Project 1-40 update Ed Harrigan and Gary Sharpe Ed presented the status of each of the tasks under project 1-40 along with details on the progress of tasks A (independent review), D (software), B IV (User Manual), and Z (guide revision). Then Gary provided the 1-40 panels perspective on implementation. Task A is completed and produced NCHRP Research Results Digest 307: Independent Review of the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and Software which is now available. Ed will provide copies of the digest to committee. (It is also available on  HYPERLINK "http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_307.pdf" http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_307.pdf ) In May 2007 the JTCP could expect to have the opportunity to approve the 3 products (User Manual, software, and guide). The JTCP was reminded that the Subcommittee on Research (SCOR) provided $250k for the manual and FHWA will be sponsoring the upcoming workshop. There was a discussion on the upcoming workshop as far as timing (perhaps late April), the number of days (1 or 2 days). These items will be discussed at the panel meeting (12/11/06). JTCP expects to conduct the balloting process on the 3 products around the same time as the workshop. The JTCP recommendation will be submitted to Subcommittee on Materials (SOM) for their August meeting and to the Subcommittee on Design (SOD) for their June meeting. JTCP will request the SOM and SOD chairs to use special balloting and as a provisional or interim acceptance of the MEPDG. Dan will check with Ken Kobetsky to check on correct terminology. The JTCP Chair (Dan Dawood) plans to attend both meetings and request a response back in order to hand off the products and recommendations to SCOH in 2007. The JTCP wants to ensure that the process keeps moving along. Workshop is not intended as a training session, it is part of the balloting process. Planning for one representative from each state, preferably people that work in design and make the decision. Each State will have one vote, so it is important that there is coordination in determining which way to vote. The JTCP will get a current draft of the manual, based on concurrence from 1-40 panel. Other States will get the copies for the workshop. There was a suggestion to call this something other than a workshop since it is not training. JTCP will need to prepare a letter to invite participants and define the purpose and goal of representatives that will attend the workshop. The letter will be sent to SCOH (Chief Engineers) to let them know the pavement design representative will provide information back to SOM and SOD representatives so they can vote (with one voice). The NCHRP 1-40 panel will be discussing the specific details (duration, # of reps, terminology, date, location, etc.) of the workshop on 12/11/06. Dan Dawood presented Gary Sharpe with a plaque on behalf of the JTCP. The plaque reflects the appreciation of the JTCP to Gary for the work he did for the AASHTO Joint Task Force on Pavements (predecessor to the JTCP) and his service as its last Chair. Gary provided the leadership and encouragement for the members to press on to meet the goals and accomplish the tasks needed to move toward a new method of pavement design. Gary reflected on the challenges that are almost inherent to this type of effort and encouraged the JTCP to continue making progress and improvements for pavement technology. FWD File Format - Eric Weaver The presentation entitled Proposed Changes to the AASHTO PDDX-1 File Format included background information on AASHTOs 1998 Pavement Deflection Data Exchange Technical Data Guide, an overview of the issue being encountered by using the current format, and the recommended changes. Andy Mergenmeier will take a look at the FWD standard and provide technical comments to the JTCP along with coordinating with the SOM. There was discussion about the new standards being published through the JTCP as the owner. Discussion: Californias comments on MEPDG Bill Farnbach Bill provided a handout to the committee outlining Californias comments on issues with the design guide for the NCHRP 1-40 panels consideration. Pavement Preservation and State Practice Reviews - Joe Gregory The presentation provided an overview of pavement preservation and the FHWAs technical appraisal project being conducted with State DOTs along with a summary of some preliminary findings. There was a discussion about FHWAs pavement preservation activities. JTCP was advised that Steve Varnadoe or Jim Sorenson should be contacted if there are members interested in working with the committee that oversees the contract for the Preservation Help Desk. There was a suggestion made that FHWA should produce a best practices document to assist States in making the case for not doing a specific treatment. Part of the discussion also recommended caution in the use of the preservation concepts and emphasizing that it is not the same as perpetual pavements. It was pointed out that regulations should prevent using preservation funding as a fix (for wrong time, project) to maintain a bad road. Highways for Life Update - Charlie Goodspeed Charlie provided an overview of the Highways for Life Program along with the goals and schedule. The presentation also highlighted 3 innovative paving projects that have been proposed. One of the highlighted technologies is two-lift construction. If a State is interested in using this technology on a project, please contact Tom Cackler at ISU (515-294-3230) or Charlie Goodspeed. Discussion: Guide on Pavement Friction Amir Hanna (also referred to in item 5) The JTCP needs to accept the guide and recommend it to the SOD to be adopted by AASHTO. Mike Murphy (TX) volunteered to work on getting the comments together on the guide (contingent on if Mr. Jay Bledsoe is not available). Mike Pologruto (VT) motioned for balloting the Guide for Pavement Friction. Andy Mergenmeier (VA) seconded the motion. No opposition, motion passed. Discussion: Suggestion for NCHRP Project Statement Linda Pierce Linda presented the JTCP with a suggestion that a pavement textbook is needed. The textbook would encompass a full range of topics related to pavements (pavement management, smoothness, preservation, construction, etc.) from an introduction to an expert level. After some discussion the JTCP supported the idea to submit this to NCHRP. Linda will prepare a research statement to submit this to NCHRP by Monday (12/11/06) as a project to produce an AASHTO document on pavements. The discussion also included the recognition that the JTCP needs to have better communication with other committees through the liaisons and improve the process for submitting research statements to NCHRP. Discussion: PDG balloting process Dan Dawood The issue of the next steps and balloting process for the MEPDG were mentioned and discussed on several occasions throughout the meeting. This discussion was intended to summarize and clarify the process for the JTCP members. The process should be as follows: JTCP ballots the products Recommendation is sent to SOM for review and comments Then submit recommendation/products to SOD for approval SOD will make a resolution SOD sends the resolution and JTCP recommendation to SCOH There was a suggestion to include in the transmittal letter important points of the guide such as that this is the first time material characteristics are included in pavement structural design.     Page  PAGE 1 of  NUMPAGES 7 -45GHN]_  & [ p ( , - 3 4 ; < G   , J N _ ` a þ hKyhKyh c h\h\h\h hh hhQ3 h6 hb6 h\6 hQ36 hc 6hQ3hQ36 hQ3hQ3hQ3 hR>*hRhR>* hs>* h<>v5h4hR5h+ h4hR35H^_ ` a 01[  ?gdRgd & FgdRgdM & FgdM & Fgd\gdKygdQ3 & FgdKy$a$gdR1$gdRXX  V t /01JMZ[  )>?:)<ǿh,4hj hjhj hj6hh6hRhR>*hR h5\hRhKyhKy>*hMhM6 hMhMhMh8j h[;6 h8j6 hKy6hKyhKy6 hKyhKyhKy8,-7h+,:;P  gd|a  gdu[ & F  gd|agd( & Fgd( & Fgd(^gdm^q^gd"8 & Fgd"8gdR+,  :;_Ajstw #$-:NO¾¦hu[hu[6 hu[6 h6hh6h|a h|ah|a hj56hjhj56hm^qh(hm^qh(5hm^qhm^q5 h(5 hj5 h+5h"8 h"85 h a%5 h a%H*h a%hj4OP cefgF\]i)?NOcv  !񸱸񬧠hWU hhhhhhhnFhA hAhA hA5 hu[5 hGhGhGjhNOU hNOhNOh$A$G$K$$$$$% %+%%%%%&P(R() ) )1)2)q**+S+U+V+h+m++,,,,,,,,,-P.. ////$/%/0/;/@/E////u0v0F22P3]3m3ʽ±h)h@khrh|$h|$6 h|$6h c5h|$h[4hh7h24Th*haz h%5 huv5huvh%hhhPhm^qA#%%%%R( ) )2)p*q**,,/////v0<1=11gd c5gd|$ & Fgd c5 & Fgd*gdaz & Fgduvgduv^gd% & Fgd%gd%11O3P3m33\5]5w5*6778r9s99(:,;-;e; & Fgd-gdH & Fgd5gd5^gd[?gdGlgds0 & FgdGlgdR^gdWgd&= & Fgd@kgd c5m33333333346484m4o4444444,5-5/5;5>5I5Z5\5]5v5w555555555666(6)6*66666666778ֹ޵h[?hhs0hs06>*hs0hs06 hs06hs0hR>*hGljGhWhW5UjhWhW5UhWhW5 hW5 h)5 h@k5h&=h&=6 hJ26 h&=6688888q9r9s9999999&:(:*:,:2:L:l:o:,;T;d;e;"<#<U<V<e<f<<<= =j=k=w=========>>ּ{h:h6ch-0Jjh-Ujh-U h-h-hpx hpx6 hll6hllhll6hllh-hF hH6 hF6hHhH6h5 h5h5 h5h[? hs5 h55 h[?5h[?h[?50e;f<==?!@"@@AAjBkBDEEsFtFHHH JJJgd` ^gd` gdx & Fgd` gd5gd^gd<gd<^gdgd->>>4>6>;><>K>n>>>>>????? @!@@/AGAAAAAAAAB,B6B9B:BEBJBVB[BkBwBzB*DDDDEEErFsFFF!G#G'G4Gָּּּּּ֛֬hJY4h WhUDh5 h55h5h55hAhzhz>*hzhxh} h<5 hUD5hh<5h< h5 h:@5hh5hhgHChpxh:h-84G6GDGNGrGHHHHHHHII JJjJJJJJJJJJKKKKKsLuLLLLLLLLLsMMM:N=N~OOOOOePPPPPPQh(Qh(Qh(Q6 hB+FhB+FhB+FhB+F>*hB+F hI@GhI@GhI@G hI@G6hI@GhI@G6hh p hx5 h` 5h` h` 5 hx6hxhx6 h` h` h` hJY4hUD8JJ)KKKKLMM}O~OOeP+Q,Q}Q^RRRRR8S & Fgdj;^gd:gd:gdgdB+Fgd(Q & FgdB+FgdI@G & Fgd` gd` Q Q QQ*Q+Q,Q8Q_Q|Q}Q^RlRRRRRRRRRSTTUUU VVV3VVVVVVVWWWXXXXXXXXXXXǿǻǶǠh chM;h5 h` hB+FhB+F hB+FhB+F28STUUUUVVW7WmWWWWWXXXXXXXXXgdgds & Fgd1dgd:@ & Fgdj;^gdj;gdj;XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX hhAhM@2 RTitle$a$5\6U@6 NO Hyperlink >*B*ph4@4 ` Header  !4 @"4 ` Footer  !P 5H^_`a01[  ? , - 7 h   +,:;P   efR ! !2!p"q""$$'''''v(<)=)))O+P+m++\-]-w-*.//0r1s11(2,3-3e3f4557!8"8899j:k:<==s>t>@@@ BBBB)CCCCDEE}G~GGeH+I,I}I^JJJJJ8KLMMMMNNO7OmOOOOOPPPPPPPPP0000 0000 000 0000 000 00000000 0 0000 0 000000 000000000 000 000 00000000 0 0 0 00000 0 00 0 000000 0 0000000 0 000 0000000 0000 0000000000000000000 00000 000 000000 0000 000000 000000 000 0 0 0 0 00000h0000h00h00h00@0h00 ///2 O#m38>4GQXX-023569:<=?A#1e;J8SXX.1478;>@BX/f\/,,,-j555PXXXXX*,2!8@0(  B S  ?!=ޕ=z=?=tt=ty=tz=tx=w=ݿ==ݕ=t{=<=w=tw=>=4{==`=4v=dm=T=r== <=|= '=L=t8= f=LԖ==5,," t :FF "'#'#(4(47i>>>r?r? @ @BB\C\CLP      G44* | ANN"-#-#,4,47q>>>v?v?$@$@CCfCfCLP  9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity9 *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace8!*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdate PuC1112200620076DayMonthYear! !!      !!     !o {  z\012$$...///11j555555>>>>>>_AgACDIDDDDDE$EGG I)IcJlJPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP7~ I 5?4F4Q55:.;;;JJPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP333333339?)  e3#4f4k:;^JJPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP\0j55>>PPPPPPPPPPPPPPP108f%&zBW//\ yv\;O ;SAh hh^h`hH.h88^8`OJQJo(hHh L^`LhH.h   ^ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h xLx^x`LhH.h HH^H`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.hhh^h`OJQJo(hHh 88^8`hH.h L^`LhH.h   ^ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h xLx^x`LhH.h HH^H`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.hhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH1;SABW//v\;%                                             ba>X )}1dGlLNOAF` H"8c a=! a%V(+.J2,4JY4[45 c55e57::>;[?:@m@CgHCUDgEB+FnFI@GSH`5KM(Q24T cBmMvuvpxKyaz\hyWU(|aAP*|$WllA@k<2Q3z W8jXG[;xh%&=-bu[sR5js0rj;@|n7P@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1h&& D) D)!4dPP 2QHX ?R2-AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on PavementsHomeKPlatte       Home)P .AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements TitlexHd       _PID_HLINKS_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName_ReviewingToolsShownOnce DatePosted DocumentKeywords DocumentNotes Committee DocumentCategory AbstractAl =http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_307.pdfn& 8http://design.transportation.org/?siteid=59&pageid=1961=http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_276.pdf\ .http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/013017.pdf6>Ohttp://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/library/research/docs/tsrs/tsrasphaltconcrete.pdfP 6$Draft Minutes for Dec. JTCP meetingEwa.Flom@dot.govFlom, Ewa 2007-01-29T11:08:56Zns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"/>as.microsoft.com/office/2006/metadata/longProperties"/> ?@ABCEFGHIJKMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijlmnqrstuvwxyz}Root Entry FEData D1TableL<WordDocument4SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8XCompObjqMsoDataStoreEE 4 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01235789  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89qDocumentLibraryFormDocumentLibraryFormDocumentLibraryForm This value indicates the number of saves or revisions. The application is responsible for updating this value after each revision. 1/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"/>doc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/internal/2005/internalDocumentation"> This value indicates the number of saves or revisions. The application is responsible for updating this value after each revision. ns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"/>w>