ࡱ> @ |Objbjצצ ;|G,),),),)H)4P*P*P*P*P*P*P*P*f4h4h4h4h4h4h4$7RU947,P*P*7,7,4P*P*4---7,P*P*f4-7,f4--00P*D* 𒻰,),:0"1D4040,:-:0:0,P*h*J-+<>+P*P*P*44#- #Project Logical Framework Kagera Transboundary Agro-Ecosystem Management Project (Kagera TAMP) Overall goal: Adoption of an integrated ecosystems approach for the management of land resources in the Kagera Basin will generate local, national and global benefits including: restoration of degraded lands, carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation, agro-biodiversity conservation and sustainable use, protection of international waters and improved agricultural production, leading to increased food security and improved rural livelihoods. SummaryIndicators (OVIs)Means of VerificationHypotheses / critical assumptions and risksEnvironment and development objectives The environmental objective is to address the causes of land degradation and restore ecosystem health and functions in the Kagera basin through the introduction of adapted agro-ecosystem management approaches. The development objective is to improve the livelihood opportunities, resilience and food security of rural communities (men, women and children) in the Kagera Basin through adoption of more productive and sustainable resource management practices that are technically feasible and socio-economically viable. Improved land use systems/ management practices for the range of agro-ecological zones in the basin being tested and adapted (by end PY3) for arable and pastoral systems including measures for reducing pressures on wetlands, riverbanks, forest and protected areas. Transformation of 43,700 ha of land by PY3 and 100,000 ha by PY5 towards more productive and sustainable agricultural ecosystems 6 % of todays basin population (1,035,200) reached through project activities in target communities, micro-catchments, agro-ecological units and 30% of the basin population (5-6million) indirectly benefiting. River basin and micro-catchment assessments of land degradation and ecosystem functions. District development and economic reports Field surveys  Strong commitment to address land degradation within the context of sustainable development and poverty alleviation programmes in all four beneficiary countries. District offices commit staff and other necessary resources to TAMP implementation Absence of serious environmental events (drought leading to food shortage, flooding), crop and livestock (pests and diseases) shocks in project countries. Outcomes1. Transboundary coordination, information sharing and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms operational and effective in promoting sustainable, productive agro-ecosystems and restoration of degraded lands. Transboundary agro-ecosystem management programme to reverse land degradation being implemented and monitored by the 4 riverine countries in 21 districts, reviewed by national and regional PSCs and project activities and achievements widely shared and available (PY5). Best practices for addressing transboundary land-related constraints through integrated ecosystems and inter-sectoral approaches mainstreamed in planning and development processes, including NAPs, and pilot actions implemented to address transboundary issues in 68 communities (PY3) and replicated in 21 districts (PY5). Regular budgetary allocations from Governments to transboundary coordination and collaboration in the Kagera Basin increased by 10 % (PY5) Reports and decisions of district, national, river basin policy and planning mechanisms Project steering committee reports Technical reports and project progress reports Field surveys National and district financial accounts Participating countries and institutions continue to prioritise project goal to mitigate the causes and negative impacts of land degradation and need for inter-country and inter-sectoral processes for the river basin National and district institutions and partners agree to mainstream sustainable land management into their programmes and activities by adopting integrated and inter-sectoral policies and approaches. Communication and exchange of information unhindered between district, national central and river basin levels Regional collaboration unhindered 2 Enabling policy, planning and legislative conditions are in place to support and facilitate the sustainable management of agro-ecosystems and the restoration of degraded land. Priority policy, legal and transboundary issues identified and agreed at community (68), district (21) and river basin levels for SLaM (end PY2) and resulting in supporting policy decisions, regulatory mechanisms and community bye-laws for improved harmonization and application (PY5). At least 2 policy recommendations per country developed that support policy-decisions and regulatory mechanisms at national level, and 1 per country that support bye-laws, etc. at district/ community level.Action plan for the establishment of a supporting policy and legal framework for SLaM across the basin. National and regional workshop reportsIncentive mechanisms and regulatory actions exist National and local governments agree to shift focus from enforcement to provision of an enabling /supportive environment3. Capacity and knowledge are enhanced at all levels for the promotion of and technical support for sustainable management of land and agro-ecosystems in the basin. 300 staff (15/district) trained to support their district and communities for SLaM decision making and implementation and using TAMP information resources (PY5) 120,000 persons trained at all levels in agro-ecosystems assessment and management (PYs 1-5) for pastoral, arable, mixed systems and their on- and off-site impactsProject progress reports Reports of staff and other stakeholder training workshopsLocal institutions and partners willing to mainstream SLaM into their programmes and activities to upgrade the capacity of their staff in sustainable land management. persons trained available for follow up support4. Improved land and agro-ecosystem management practices are implemented and benefiting land users for the range of agro-ecosystems in the basin. 10% reduction in soil erosion from 45,000 ha of land of pilot communities (PY5) 10% reduction in sediment loads from 4 target micro-catchments (PY5) 20% increase in soil carbon stores on farmer study plots and sample sites in target arable and pasture lands (PY5) 30% increase in vegetation cover (above and below ground biomass) on pilot 23,000 ha arable and 7,500 ha pasture lands (PY5) 120,000 farmers successfully implementing and benefiting from agro-ecosystem management practices and sustainable use of biodiversity in target communities (PY5) 10% increase in production (crop; livestock; fuelwood; biodiverse products) contributing to poverty reduction and food security, from SLaM activities in target communities (68 communities by PY3 and a further 200 by PY5)LAMIS data (RS/GIS)including field monitoring of target areas Ad hoc surveys of land degradation, agro-ecological systems analysis and agro-biodiversity Community/district surveys (poverty reduction; health; food security) Involvement of local stakeholders and communities unrestricted District planning and development offices and mainstream agriculture and environment programmes supporting TAMP activities (financial and technical) as outlined in co-financing plan Absence of civil strife, major refugee movements or serious environmental events (drought leading to food shortage, flooding), crop and livestock (pests and diseases) shocks in project countries. Outputs1.1A basin-wide coordination mechanism is established to facilitate trans-boundary dialogue, basin-level planning, policy harmonisation and coordination of national/sub-national actions.Sustainable coordination mechanism for SLaM agreed upon among the 4 countries (eventually as part of wider NBI and EAC mechanisms) and reflected in an intercountry MOU and partnership arrangements with LVEMP and NBI-NELSAP. Recommendations to harmonise policies, laws and regulations and address transboundary issues in the river basin developed by an ad-hoc basin-wide task force with stakeholders (PY3) and mechanisms in place for their implementation in 21 districts (by PY5).Report on options for basin wide coordination of SLaM National policies and action plans reflect regional collaboration Reports of RPSC meetings include results of coordination with NBI-NELSAP and LVEMP processes. Project progress reports MOU/other collaboration mechanisms with LVEMP and NBI-NELSAP Relevant river and lake basin reports (LVEMP, NBI) reflecting collaboration with TAMPGood cooperation among national and local government and river basin institutions and among sectors (water, land, agriculture, environment and forestry, community development) Interest by existing river/lake basin processes to collaborate with land and agriculture1.2 An efficient basin-wide knowledge management system is established to support information requirements and decision-making processes at all levels. TAMP knowledge management system established and functioning at all levels (PY2) including: Kagera environmental monitoring and information system (EMIS) supported by a GIS and RS tools (PY1-5) and linked with LVEMP and NELSAP databases. Pilot district level GISs developed and operational - 1/country (by PY3). Community information centres set up and servicing stakeholders in target communities (PY2). Membership of networks and selected experts from networks supporting TAMP activities especially capacity building (IW LEARN, WOCAT, ASARECA). EMIS, pilot district GIS and community information centre outputs (regularly updated) Project M & E system Project progress reports Extensive roster of experts in the region through networks Membership by district/technical resource persons of networks e.g. IW Learn, WOCAT et al. Countries willing to collaborate in integrated information systems and sharing data on regional basis Good communication, information exchange among countries and partner institutions District offices commit staff and other necessary resources to house / maintain pilot GISs (one in each country) Local stakeholders willing to participate in community information centres1.3 Project monitoring and evaluation systems supporting TAMP implementation and decision making. M & E system established and functioning Project management and district partners trained in data collection and participatory M&E (by end PY 1) M&E reports issues in a timely manner Steering committee reports Project progress reports Mid-term (PY3) and final (PY5) evaluation reportsCommunication and exchange of information unhindered1.4 Kagera TAMP project management structures are operational and effective.Project management structures established (PY1) Project staff recruited (PY1) Adequate premises, equipment and support services provided (PY1). Resource mobilisation strategy and co-funding plan regularly updated and shared with partners, in accordance with GEF land degradation requirements (PY1- 5).Reports of PSC meetings and communications with TAC members Project progress reports Co-financing reports Concerned ministries of the riparian states continue to cooperate in project implementation Committee members are committed and supportive Local government co-operation effective 2.1 Sustainable management of land and agro-ecosystems (SLAM) mainstreamed in national development policies and programmes, enhancing synergy among sector strategies and across the river basin SLaM considerations integrated in district development plans (21), NAPs (4) and NBSAPs (4), river basin and other relevant plans (PY3-5) Successful and diverse experiences of inter-sectoral processes and systems approaches for SLaM in 21 districts and the river basin (PY4-5).District development plans National plans reflect SLaM considerations (NAPs, NBSAPs) River basin reports (Kagera, Nile, LVEMP National and local governments and institutions and partners agree to: mainstream SLaM into their programmes and activities including NAP/ NBSAP implementation adopt integrated and inter-sectoral policies and approaches provide technical and financial support 2.2 Regulatory actions developed and used to promote - or remove existing barriers to - sustainable land and agro-ecosystem management Locally adapted by laws developed and agreed at community level (24 cases/ country) (PY3) and implemented (PY5) Best practices for effective policy and legal application/enforcement disseminated in the basin (PY 2-5).Compendium of byelaws and regulations Reports of stakeholder consultations Project progress reportsDistricts agree to/support stakeholder consultations to identify policy and legal constraints and opportunities 2.3 A coherent strategic and planning framework developed and implemented (from river basin to district/provincial and community levels) to support SLM efforts by rural communities.National and local government staff trained in land use planning (at least 42 district level; 64 community level) (PY1-5) Land use policy being effectively applied/ enforced in 68 communities by PY5. Participatory strategies and action plans developed for SLaM in 21 districts across the basin (PY1-3) improved pasture and rangelands management (at least 15 areas; 7,500ha) transboundary livestock movements (5 borders) conservation and sustainable use of wetlands (at least 9 areas; 6,000 ha), conservation and sustainable use of agro-biodiversity (68 communities) sustained energy supply (68 communities) Reports of workshops Reviews of status and trends and opportunities/options for SLaM and documented use of relevant LVEMP and NBI-NELSAP studies and experts. EMIS maps, analyses and reports District and community action plans Project progress reports National and district level planning authorities recognize the benefits of SLM strategies District planners agree to improve implementation and monitoring of land use plans for SLaM Local government are willing to embrace SLM and to support improved management for common property resources 3.1 Methods and approaches to promote the adoption of SLM practices and agro-ecosystems (pastoral and cropping) are identified, developed and validated through participatory action-research.Demonstration sites (68) and FFS study plots (136) identified and agreed upon (end PY1), established (end PY2) and FFS study plots scaled-up x 3 (PY4-5) Training materials developed and used in training in 21 districts Advocacy and training materials disseminated and used in 21 districts and 68 communities (PY3), available from community information centres and districts as and when required in the basin (PY 5)Documentary, educational & training material produced (video films technical and advocacy leaflets, maps, etc.) Training reports Project progress and technical reports Local governments agree to participatory extension approaches3.2 The quality of services provided to rural communities enhanced, particularly through intersectoral approaches that build on local knowledge and innovations for improved agro-ecosystems managementFFS facilitators/extensionists (150); district staff (4 x 21), community leaders (150) and partner NGO staff (42) trained in PLAR approaches (PY 2+) and best practices for SLaM. Target communities (68) benefiting from improved access to service providers competent in SLaM (planning; intersectoral/ systems approaches) Field surveys and interviews Training workshop reports District and community reports Project progress reports Service providers interested and available to support the programme and to benefit from targeted training 4.1 Participatory land management plans are developed and implemented in targeted communities, micro-catchments and wider land units.100 participatory land use plans and action plans developed (PY2) and being implemented (PY2-4) and replicated x 2 (PY5) community action plans (68) micro-catchments (46); pasture/ range areas (15); target wetlands (10); riverbanks (1000km) Capacity built for implementation and monitoring of community action plans (PY1-5) in 136 communities.Community / district land use plans and management reports Technical reports GIS / RS outputs Project progress reportsCommunities and districts agree to develop and implement improved action plans for SLaM and integrated them with other planning processes4.2 Improved land use and agro-ecosystem management practices are successfully adopted by farmers and herders in targeted communities and replicated in other areas.136 communities implementing SLaM (PY5) Wide adoption of improved agricultural systems, management practices including biodiversity conservation by members of 72 farmer/herder groups (PY3) and replicated x 3 (PY5) 1,800 farmers trained through FFS approaches (PY3) and a further 3,600 farmers by PY5 Local-level indicators of benefits of SLaM (income, household food security, reduced risk) confirmed by all target farmer groups and a sample 10 % of the target population (100,000 persons) (by PY5)Training reports FFS records GIS / RS maps, analyses and reports Project progress reportsFarmers available to participate in training and interested in applying SLaM4.3 Market opportunities and other incentive/ benefit sharing mechanisms for the provision of environmental services identified, demonstrated and promoted among land users.Incentive and benefit sharing mechanisms (monetary; non-monetary) identified and supporting adoption of SLaM and biodiversity conservation, including payments for environmental services (PES), products added-value and marketing in 34 communities (PY 1-5) Incentive/ support mechanisms reaching vulnerable groups (tenant farmers, youth, HIV/AIDS widows/orphans; female headed households) 15% of target population (PY5)Technical Reports Reviews of incentive/benefit sharing measures and options Local surveys on poverty, health, income, vulnerability etc Project progress reportsIncentives (e.g. competitions, access to grants etc) encourage farmers to implement SLaM District agriculture programmes and NGOs support diversification and marketing PES (including carbon offset credits) available to Kagera farmers Lack of major price fluctuations (inputs/ products), inflation, market failures  PQ^_l# $ 3Eis8S%&ſſhZCJnH tH hZB*CJph hZ:CJ hZ5CJ hZ7CJ hZ>*CJ hZ5CJhZOJQJ hZCJhZ5:CJhZ:CJOJQJhZ5:@CJOJQJhZB*ph hZ5hZ5:OJQJ2_$ , > T $IfgdZx1$gdZ$@ <^@ `a$gdZ $^a$gdZ|O | 7,, x$IfgdZkd$$Ifl4\j )6    t(04 lap(| =iE34 x$IfgdZ x$IfgdZ xx$IfgdZ $IfgdZ 45>?@Ai```` $IfgdZkd($$Ifl\j )6   t04 laABai]TIIT x$IfgdZ $IfgdZ $$Ifa$gdZkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 laFisx$&`#$/IfgdZ x$IfgdZ vx$IfgdZ $$Ifa$gdZ8ji]TIIIII x$IfgdZ $IfgdZ $$Ifa$gdZkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 laj/&^RI $IfgdZ $$Ifa$gdZkdt$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la x$IfgdZ&NC7 $$Ifa$gdZkd8$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la & F hH($If^H`gdZ <$IfgdZ' !!""/#v#w##m$1%2% x$IfgdZ $IfgdZv#w#1%B%%%)*k*o*++G.H..///#0L0A1B1w1|1V222]3_3`344444t7z77788=9>999f:g:<==>>??AAAA8B=BCCBDCDE$EEEH HHHIIJJJJFK hZCJhZnH tH hZhZCJOJQJmH sH hZB*CJph hZ5CJ hZCJO2%3%;%<%=%>%i`UUU x$IfgdZ $IfgdZkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la>%?%%&'(U(((i`UGUUUU$x$Ifa$gdZ x$IfgdZ $IfgdZkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la( )a)*k*l*+b+^UJ <$IfgdZ $IfgdZkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la x$IfgdZb++?,,,-----F.G.H../s// x$IfgdZ  3x$If^3gdZ & F hH($If^H`gdZ//"0#0L0000i]TI>>> x$IfgdZ x$IfgdZ $IfgdZ $$Ifa$gdZkdH$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la01B1w1x1112V2^M X"$If^"gdZkd $$Ifl\j )6   t04 la x$IfgdZV2203I3_3`33344 x$IfgdZ x$IfgdZ 4444b55 6D6m6i]TIIIII x$IfgdZ $IfgdZ $$Ifa$gdZkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 lam6n667L7u7 & F hI$If^I`gdZ & F hH($If^H`gdZ  ($IfgdZ x$IfgdZu7v77p889%9>999i`UUUUUUU x$IfgdZ $IfgdZkd $$Ifl\j )6   t04 la 99g::0;;i`RRG ($IfgdZ$x$Ifa$gdZ $IfgdZkdX $$Ifl\j )6   t04 la;;<Z<<<<l======%>>>> x$IfgdZ x$IfgdZ & F hH($If^H`gdZ>>?J@@QAAi`QCQ8 x$IfgdZ$x$Ifa$gdZ  x$IfgdZ $IfgdZkd $$Ifl\j )6   t04 laAAAA8B9BCKB $IfgdZkd $$Ifl\j )6   t04 la X $If^gdZ x$IfgdZCCCD`DzDDDE x$IfgdZ  x$IfgdZ$x$Ifa$gdZE EEFGPGaGzGH x$IfgdZ$x$Ifa$gdZ & F hI<$If^I`gdZ & F hH($If^H`gdZHHHHIIJi`RRG` x$IfgdZ$x$Ifa$gdZ $IfgdZkdh $$Ifl\j )6   t04 laJJJJJFKGKKL^UG$x$Ifa$gdZ $IfgdZkd,$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la x$IfgdZFKKKKKzO{O|OhXq hZCJ hZ5CJLMMMMM$N=NNN)OzO x$IfgdZ X$If^gdZ$x$Ifa$gdZ zO{O|Oigkd$$Ifl\j )6   t04 la9&P 1h0:pZA .!"#$% &$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l4  t(05 55 5 4p($$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4$$If!vh5 55 5 #v #v#v #v :V l t05 55 5 4@`@ ZNormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DAD Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No List4 4 ZFooter  p#44 ZHeader  p#HC`H ZBody Text Indenthx^hPo"P Z body text$a$CJOJQJaJmH sH tH `2 ZFootnote Text,Footnote Text Char,Footnote Text Char Char Char Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char Char Char Char1,Footnote Text Char Char Char Char Char1,Footnote Text Char Char Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char Char Char CharCJaJTJ`BT ZSubtitle$a$"5CJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH |G _$,>T|=iE3 4 5 > ? @ A B    a F i s8j/&N'/vwm123;<=>? U !a!"k"l"#b##?$$,%%%%%F&G&H&&'s'''"(#(L(((()B)w)x)))*V**0+I+_+`+++,,,,,b-- .D.m.n../L/u/v//p001%1>1111g2203334Z4444l555555%666667J88Q999998:9:;;C<`<z<<<= ==><>T>p>>>?>?P?a?z?@@@@AABBBBBFCGCCDEEEEE$F=FFF)GzG{G~G0000 0 0 0 0 000 000 0000 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0000 0000000 000000 0 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 000000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 000000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0000 0 00 00 0000 0 0 0 0000 0000 0000 0 00 00 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 00 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0000 0 @0  @0 @0 @0  @0 @0 @0 @0  @0  @0  @0  @0 @0  @0 @0 @0 @0  @0  @0  @0  @0 @7 0 @7 0 @7 0 @7 0 @7 0 @0  @0 @0 @0 @0  @0  @0  @0  @0 @0 @!0 @0  @0 @0 @0 @0  @0  @0  @0  @0 @0  @0 @0 @0 @0 @0 @0  @0 @0 @0 @0  @0   {004 5 A B 23>?k"l"''w)x),,u/v/11668:9:= =@@FCGCFF)GzG{G~G?0,en#n#?0den#n#?0=7n#n#?0\7n#n#?0Ȓ7n#n#?0 7n#n#?0 7n#n#?07n#n#?07n#n#?07n#n#?0 7n#n#?0X7n#n#?07n#n#?07n#n#?007n#n#?0ȩn#n#?0 n#n#?0"8n#n#?0p ,on#n#?0p do?0?0?0n# ?0p FK|O(4H | 4Aj&2%>%(b+/0V24m6u79;>ACEpFHJLzO|O)+,-./012356789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGIJ|O*ٱd$ ڱ<۱$ ܱ 2 ݱޱ,߱$ a.~G e.~G=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace  !.RX8<#)&/E R   [G~GN Z ] e %545~G3333$T5 B &N3?+,%1>1344455>>BB$F=F~G~G pK4h^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH pL*UrbXqZZ_$,>T4 5 > ? @ A B  8&w23;<=>?a!k"l"#,%H&''#((B)w)x))*`+,,,-n.u/v//0>111g245667Q998:9:;C<<= ==?z?@@@BBFCGCCE=FzG{G~G@{G{G {G{G@{|G@UnknownG: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : ArialqTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman5"Geneva?5 z Courier NewA& Arial Narrow;Wingdings"1hrFsF <$ <$YZ24XGXG3QH)?UrbPROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORKBuerli, Markus (AGLL)Buerli, Markus (AGLL) Oh+'0 4@ \ h tPROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK.ROJBuerli, Markus (AGLL)ORueruer Normal.dotkBuerli, Markus (AGLL)OR1erMicrosoft Word 10.0@F#@@JȪ <՜.+,0  hp  FAO of the UNI$XGO PROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKMNOPQRSUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqstuvwxy{|}~Root Entry FData L1TableT:WordDocument;SummaryInformation(rDocumentSummaryInformation8zCompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q