ࡱ> hjabcdefgM kbjbj== WWl,T"***^,$o "^^"**470"**,&Z#q*H ֪"4J:qgHnM#//qWichita Transit Wichita, KS Assessment of ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Capacity Constraints August 12-15, 2002 Summary of Observations Prepared for Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights Washington, DC Prepared by Planners Collaborative, Inc. with Multisystems, Inc. Final Report: April 21, 2003 CONTENTS  TOC \o "1-2" \h \z  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548807" I. Purpose of the Assessment  PAGEREF _Toc25548807 \h 1  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548808" II. Overview of the Assessment  PAGEREF _Toc25548808 \h 3  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548809" III. Background  PAGEREF _Toc25548809 \h 7  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548810" IV. Summary of Findings  PAGEREF _Toc25548810 \h 11  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548811" V. Observations Regarding ADA Complementary Paratransit Eligibility & Other Service Criteria  PAGEREF _Toc25548811 \h 15  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548812" VI. Observations Regarding Telephone Capacity & Trip Reservations  PAGEREF _Toc25548812 \h 20  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548813" VII. Observations Regarding Scheduling of Trip Requests  PAGEREF _Toc25548813 \h 25  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548814" VIII. Observations Regarding Service Provision  PAGEREF _Toc25548814 \h 28  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548815" A. Analysis of On-Time Performance  PAGEREF _Toc25548815 \h 33  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548816" B. Analysis of Trip Length  PAGEREF _Toc25548816 \h 37  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc25548817" IX. Resources  PAGEREF _Toc25548817 \h 42  Attachment A Response from Wichita Transit Attachment B On-Site Assessment Schedule Attachment C A Guide to Paratransit Services Attachment D Application for ADA Paratransit Eligibility Attachment E Cover Letter for Eligibility Application Attachment F Sample Letter of Approval for ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Attachment G Sample Denial Letter Attachment H Paratransit Appeal Process Attachment I Sample Monthly Report for WT Van Leased to Contractor Purpose of the Assessment Public entities that operate fixed route transportation services for the general public are required by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) to provide ADA Complementary Paratransit service for persons who, because of their disability, are unable to use the fixed route system. These regulations (49 CFR Parts 27, 37, and 38) include six service criteria, which must be met by ADA Complementary Paratransit service programs. Section 37.135(d) of the regulations requires that ADA Complementary Paratransit services meet these criteria by January 26, 1997. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is responsible for ensuring compliance with the ADA and the DOT regulations. As part of its compliance efforts, FTA, through its Office of Civil Rights, conducts periodic assessments of fixed route transit and ADA Complementary Paratransit services operated by grantees. The purpose of the assessment is to assist the transit agency and FTA in assessing whether capacity constraints exist in ADA Complementary Paratransit services. The compliance assessment examines service standards and policies related to issues of capacity constraints such as telephone hold times, trip denials, on-time performance, on-board travel time, and any other trip-limiting factors. The assessments consider whether there are operational patterns or practices that significantly limit the availability of service, including: trip denials; early or late pick-ups or arrivals after desired arrival (or appointment) times; long trips; or long telephone hold times as defined by established standards (or typical practices if standards do not exist). The examination of patterns or practices includes looking not just at service statistics, but also at basic service records and operating documents, and observing service to determine whether records and documents appear to reflect true levels of service delivery. Input also is gathered from local disability organizations and customers. Guidance is provided that will assist the transit service provider in ensuring that service can be effectively monitored by transit agencies for capacity constraints. FTA conducted an on-site assessment from August 12 to 15, 2002, of the ADA Complementary Paratransit service provided by Wichita Transit (WT), in Wichita, Kansas. Planners Collaborative, Inc., located in Boston, Massachusetts conducted the compliance assessment for the FTA Office of Civil Rights. The assessment focused on compliance of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service, with one specific regulatory service criterion the capacity constraints criterion. Section 37.131(f) of the DOT ADA regulations requires that ADA Complementary Paratransit services be operated without capacity constraints. This report summarizes the observations and findings of the on-site assessment of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service. First, the report describes key features of WTs special services program. The report then provides a description of the approach and methodology used to conduct the assessment. There is a summary of observations and findings related to each element of the capacity constraint criteria, and the major findings of the assessment are summarized in Section IV of this report. Recommendations for addressing some of the findings also are provided. Wichita Transit received a draft copy of the report for review and response. A copy of the correspondence received from Wichita Transit documenting the agencys response to the draft report is included as Attachment A. Overview of the Assessment This assessment focused on compliance with the ADA Complementary Paratransit capacity constraints requirements of the DOT ADA regulations. The regulations identify several possible types of capacity constraints. These include wait-listing trips, having caps on the number of trips provided, or recurring patterns or practices that result in a significant number of trip denials, untimely pickups, or excessively long trips. Capacity constraints also include other operating policies or practices that tend to significantly limit the amount of service to persons who are ADA Complementary Paratransit eligible. To assess each of these potential types of capacity constraints, the assessment focused on observations and findings regarding: Trip denials and wait-listing of trips On-time performance Travel times The assessment team also made observations and findings related to three other sets of policies and practices that could affect access to ADA Complementary Paratransit service: The ADA Complementary Paratransit service eligibility process Telephone capacity Service area and service times ADA Complementary Paratransit eligibility determinations were assessed to ensure that the system use was not impacted by inappropriate denials of eligibility for the service or unreasonable delays in the eligibility process. Telephone capacity was assessed because access to reservations and customer service staff is critical to using any ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Pre-assessment The assessment first involved the collection and review of key service information prior to the on-site visit. This information included: A brief description of WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit service A Guide to Paratransit Services The WT Operator Manual A summary of ADA Complementary Paratransit service standards Sample telephone service records Sample driver manifests A sample contract for lease of paratransit vehicles Data on trips and trip denials for fiscal years 1999, 2000, and 2001 Budget data for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 Maps of the Wichita Transit fixed route bus service The assessment team also requested that additional information be available during the site visit. This information included: Completed applications, both accepted and denied, for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Copies of completed driver manifests for recent months. Vehicle fleet and driver information of all the carriers. Sample forms used by carriers in their daily operations. Service data from selected sample days and months, including the number of trips requested, scheduled, canceled, no-shows, missed trips, trips provided, and trip durations. Written customer complaints. In addition to the review of data and direct observations, the assessment team conducted telephone interviews with five individuals who either use Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service or work with individuals who use the specialized services. On-site Assessment The on-site assessment began with an opening conference, held at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, August 12, 2002, at the Wichita Transit administrative offices at 777 East Waterman Street in Wichita. The following Wichita Transit staff attended the conference: Jay Banasiak General Manager Michael Vinson Assistant Director Forrest Nagley Special Services Manager David Chia and David Loutzenheiser of Planners Collaborative and Rosemary Mathias of Multisystems comprised the assessment team. Cheryl Hershey of the Office of Civil Rights participated in the opening conference via telephone. Ms. Hershey opened the meeting by emphasizing that the purpose of the ADA compliance assessments is to help transit properties provide effective ADA Complementary Paratransit service. She also thanked Wichita Transit staff for their cooperation in the conduct of the assessment. Ms. Hershey explained that: Preliminary findings and an opportunity to respond would be provided at a closing meeting on Thursday. A report would be drafted and provided to Wichita Transit for review and comment before being finalized as a public document. The final report would be available via the Freedom of Information Act. Mr. Chia described the schedule for the on-site assessment and the subsequent report. A copy of the assessment schedule appears in Attachment B. Wichita Transit staff indicated that they were willing to provide any information and assistance to the assessment team. At the opening conference, all three Wichita Transit staff provided an overview of the existing special services, including the use of several social service agencies as carriers for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Following the opening conference, the team members began to review material provided by WT. WT provided working space for the assessment team in its board room. One of the team members met with WTs General Manager to discuss the budgeting process. The other team members began analysis of the telephone system, service complaints, and service hours and area. On Tuesday morning, August 13, team members continued to review various aspects of WTs service. One team member met with the Special Services Manager to discuss the eligibility certification process. Another team member observed call taking and dispatching, while another team member continued with data analysis. In the afternoon, Louise Lloyd, FTA Region VII Civil Rights Officer, joined the assessment team. One team member and Ms. Lloyd visited Envision, a social service agency that is a contractor for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Another team member visited Starkey, another social service agency that is a contractor. Team members also observed the call takers, dispatchers, and schedulers and interviewed WT drivers. On Wednesday morning, August 14, one team member and Ms. Lloyd visited KETCH, another social service agency that is a contractor for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. In the afternoon, team members conducted analysis for trip lengths, on-time performance, and available resources. On Thursday morning, August 15, team members completed their on-site analysis and prepared for the afternoon exit conference. Prior to the exit conference, a team member met with the General Manager to preview the teams findings. During the exit conference, the assessment team and the FTA Civil Rights Officer presented preliminary findings, and discussed these findings and recommendations with Wichita Transit staff. WT staff who attended the exit meeting included: Jay Banasiak General Manager Michael Vinson Assistant Director Forrest Nagley Special Services Manager Roberta Wolgast, of FTAs Office of Civil Rights, participated in the exit conference via telephone. The assessment team reviewed initial findings in the areas of: Customer complaints Service area, days and hours Service eligibility Trip reservations and scheduling On-time performance Trip duration Resources Ms. Wolgast emphasized that FTA was available to provide additional technical assistance to Wichita Transit. Background Wichita Transit (WT) provides fixed route bus service and ADA Complementary Paratransit service for the City of Wichita. WT is an agency of the city, and its budget is part of the citys overall budget. The General Manager reports to the city manager. There is also a seven-member board that advises the city council on transit issues. The City of Wichita is located in Sedgwick County in south-central Kansas, about 200 miles from Kansas City. It has a population of 344,284 (2000 US census) and an area of 115 square miles. WT operates 19 bus routes including one deviation route and one historic trolley route. Service hours are generally between 5:30 a.m. and 6:45 p.m. on weekdays and 6:45 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. on Saturday. There is no Sunday service. The trolley runs only on Saturday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The base fare for bus service is one dollar. The trolley fare is 25 cents. The fixed route fleet consists of 50 buses. Thirteen of the 19 bus routes are fully accessible. Wichita Transit plans to have all routes fully accessible by the end of 2002. During fiscal year (FY) 2001, WT served slightly more than two million passenger trips on fixed route service. This was an increase of 35,100 (2%) from FY2000. Description of the ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Wichita Transit provides ADA Complementary Paratransit service through a combination of in-house service and contracted service. As of August 2002, WT had contracts with six private social service agencies in a Van Lease/Purchased Transportation program. Table III.1 lists these six agencies. Table III.1 Contract Carriers for WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Catholic Charities Adult Day Services437 North Topeka Wichita, KS 67202Cerebral Palsy Research Foundation of Kansas (CPRFK)5111 East 21st Street Wichita, KS 67208Envision2301 South Water Wichita, KS 67213Kansas Elks Training Center for the Handicapped (KETCH)1006 East Waterman Street Wichita, KS 67211ResCare Kansas Life Choices1440 East English Wichita, KS 67211Starkey, Inc.4500 West Maple Wichita, KS 67277 Collectively, these six agencies serve 70% of WTs total ADA Complementary Paratransit trips. Wichita Transit leases vans ($1/year) to these agencies for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. WT also reimburses each agency for each ADA Complementary Paratransit passenger trip provided. Agencies are responsible for drivers, vehicle maintenance, and insurance. Each agency serves its own clients they have to be ADA-certified to be eligible for reimbursement by WT primarily via group, subscription trips. Each agency also has its own vehicles. The agencies have other clients who are not certified for ADA Complementary Paratransit service who also receive transportation service. WT conducts its own certification process to determine applicant eligibility for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. ADA Complementary Paratransit service is available on weekdays from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. On Saturday, service is available from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. There is no Sunday service. The fare for a one-way trip is $2.00, payable in cash or pre-paid tickets. Eligible riders may always have a personal care attendant accompany them at no charge. Eligible riders may also have one guest ride with them; the guest pays the $2.00 fare. Additional guests may ride on a space-available basis. Children five years or younger are considered as guests, but they ride at no charge. Riders can reserve a trip from one to 14 days in advance. Call takers accept trip reservations from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays. Wichita Transit has an answering machine available from Saturday morning through Sunday until 5 p.m. for riders to reserve a trip for the following Monday. Riders can also request subscription (routine) service for identical trips (same origin and destination and times) that recur at least twice per week. The service area for WT ADA Complementary Paratransit service includes all areas within the Wichita city limits and all areas within 3/4-mile from fixed route service that operates outside the city limits. New annexations are added to the service area as appropriate. Attachment C includes A Guide to Paratransit Services. This guide provides additional information about eligibility, requesting trips, service features, and suspension policies. The guide is available on Wichita Transits web site at:  HYPERLINK "http://www.wichitagov.org/trans/WTA/paratransit.asp" www.wichitagov.org/trans/WTA/paratransit.asp. In 2001, total ADA Complementary Paratransit service ridership was 288,783. This was a 39.1% increase from 2000 ridership. For the first 6 months of 2002, ADA Complementary Paratransit service ridership was 141,166, a decrease of 8.6% compared to the same period in 2001. As of July 2002, 4,913 individuals were certified for Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Policies and Service Standards Related to Capacity Issues Wichita Transit has established service standards for telephone capacity, trip denials, on-time performance, travel time, missed trips, and resolution of complaints. The service standards are described below. Telephone Capacity: Wichita Transit has standards for call answering and call abandonment. All calls should be answered within 20 seconds. A caller should be on hold for less than one minute. No more than one percent of calls should be abandoned. Trip Denials: Wichita Transit intends to provide 100% of all trips requested. During peak periods, staff will often negotiate a pickup or return time within one hour of the requested pickup time. WT does not consider trips turned down within this window as denials. On-Time Performance: Wichita Transit has a goal of 100% on-time performance within the pickup window of 10/+5 minutes of scheduled pickup time. Travel Time: The standard for any one-way trip is less than 60 minutes on board the vehicle, regardless of the trip distance. Missed Trips: Wichita Transit accommodates 100% of scheduled trips. A missed trip rarely occurs. Complaint Handling: Wichita Transits goal is to respond to all complaints within three days. There is no service standard for the number of complaints. Consumer Comments The assessment team gathered information about the concerns of riders who use the Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service through two sources: telephone interviews with riders or professionals who work with riders, and complaints made to WT either in writing or by telephone. FTA did not have any complaints on file concerning Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service. The assessment team conducted interviews with five individuals who either use Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service or work with riders of the service, e.g., social workers, transportation coordinators at agencies. The comments from these interviews indicate that the clients and the social workers are generally satisfied with the ADA Complementary Paratransit service. There were some concerns related to late pickups and long ride times for subscription service ( which is primarily handled by the contractors. During the first 7 months of 2002, Wichita Transit received two written complaints concerning its ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Both of the complaints pertained to rude or discourteous drivers. In addition, Wichita transit maintains a separate file of letters related to WTs suspending service for rider no-shows. During the first 7 months of 2002, WT received four letters concerning service suspension. Summary of Findings This section of the report summarizes the findings drawn from the compliance assessment. The bases for these findings are addressed in the following sections of this report. The findings should be used as the basis for any corrective actions proposed by Wichita Transit. Recommendations are also included in the following sections of this report for the consideration of Wichita Transit in developing corrective actions. Findings Regarding ADA Complementary Paratransit Eligibility The title of the form included in Wichita Transits application for ADA Complementary Paratransit service, Verification of Disability or Handicap, uses outdated and unacceptable language. Wichita Transit treats incomplete applications for ADA Complementary Paratransit service in the same way that it treats denied applications ( with denial letters. The eligibility process as discussed in the U.S. DOT ADA regulations describes completion of the application process by the applicant (submission of a complete application) and a determination of eligibility by the transit entity as sequential steps. A determination that an applicant is not eligible for service based upon an incomplete application could result in otherwise eligible applicants not receiving service. Based on a sample of applications reviewed by the assessment team, Wichita Transit is very prompt in making eligibility determinations. Of 120 approved applications, 110 were processed in 0 or 1 day, with none needing more than six days. Of 27 denied applications, 23 were processed in 0 or 1 day, with none needing more than four days. WT does not appear to review applicants to determine whether or not they are able to use fixed route service. According to WTs Special Services Manager, the application form was essentially a self-certification and did not strictly limit ADA paratransit eligibility (49 CFR 37.125(a)). Efforts to serve a the trips of a large number of people who are not eligible for ADA Complementary Paratransit service could tax operating capacity and diminish service levels for ADA eligible riders. The Wichita Transit General Manager is the sole individual who makes the decision on eligibility appeals. He is the supervisor (two levels above) of the Special Services Manager, who makes the initial determination of eligibility. This procedure may conflict with DOT ADA regulatory requirements for separation of function in the appeals process at 49 CFR section 37.125(g)(2). Findings Regarding Other Service Criteria Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service operates from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday. However, service on most of WTs fixed routes starts earlier and ends later, both on weekdays and Saturdays. 49 CFR 37.131(e) requires that ADA Complementary Paratransit service be available throughout the same hours and days as the entitys fixed route service. Wichita Transit appears to provide service to all areas within 3/4-mile of its fixed route services. During the hours when its trolley is in service, the fare that WT charges for ADA Complementary Paratransit trips in the area served by the trolley route ($2.00) exceeds the allowable fare (50 cents). Findings Regarding Telephone Capacity & Trip Reservations The assessment team observed no trip denials. While the assessment team observed, call takers had little trouble recording requests for demand trips, which averaged 36 per weekday, on paper. On the initial call, call takers accept trip requests, but do not confirm pickup times with the customer. A rider who requests a demand trip must call back the day before the trip to confirm the times. If the trips have not yet been scheduled on a vehicle run, the rider must call again on the day of service. Requiring the customer to make two and sometimes three calls to reserve a trip is overly burdensome could discourage some customers from using the service. When confirming trip times with the customer, the call takers sometimes described the pickup schedule in terms of the (10/+5 minute window. More often, they indicated the precise schedule time. This practice could cause customer confusion on when to expect the vehicle to arrive. During the months of February to July 2002, Wichita Transits special services answered calls in 34 seconds, on average. In May 2002, average call waiting times of over one minute occurred from 3:15 to 4:45 p.m. WTs goal is to answer all calls within 20 seconds. Although telephone response times exceed WTs goal, it does not appear to be a significant impediment to customers scheduling trips. During the months of February to July 2002, callers to Wichita Transits special services abandoned 10% of calls. In May 2002, average abandonment rates during 15-minute increments ranged from one to 24%. Although the observed abandonment rate exceeds WTs goal of one percent, it does not appear to indicate a significant impediment in gaining access to call takers, particularly in view of the observed hold times. Findings Regarding Scheduling As of August 2002, Wichita Transit was providing between 250 and 370 ADA Complementary Paratransit trips per weekday on its own vehicles. About 20% of these trips (50 to 80) were demand trips. WT staff was able assign these trips to vehicle runs by hand. The two senior schedulers appeared to have sufficient knowledge and skill to do this work. Based on a sample of trips from Shoe-in lists analyzed by the assessment team, it appears that from 11 a.m. to 1 pm., a disproportionate number of trip requests are on the lists. While no trip denials have occurred recently, this could potentially discourage riders from seeking to take trips during this time period. Findings Regarding Dispatch and Operations Wichita Transit has contracts with six private social service agencies in a Van Lease/ Purchased Transportation program. The agencies do not provide WT with information on trip lengths, pickup and drop-off times, or on-time performance. WT does not monitor passenger trip lengths or on-time performance of any of its contractors. As a result there is no regular means of monitoring on-time performance and trip duration for contract carriers. This lack of monitoring appears to be inconsistent with 49 CFR 37.23(a), which requires a public entity using a contractor to provide demand responsive service to ensure that the private entity meets the requirements of this part that would apply to the public entity if the public entity itself provided the service. WT drivers had mixed evaluations concerning the vehicles. Some drivers mentioned problems with wheelchair straps and the capacity of certain wheelchair lifts. Both WT and contractor drivers noted that the older vans were less reliable than the newer vans. WT drivers appear to understand the WT procedures for declaring a passenger no-show. Findings Regarding On-Time Performance Wichita Transit has a goal of 100% on-time trips, with a pickup window of 10/+5 minutes. However, WT did not measure its on-time performance until late June 2002, when its drivers began to collect information on pickup times. WT does not collect any data for drop-off times for appointments. Wichita Transits contractors do not collect or report information relating to on-time performance. Wichita Transit does not monitor the on-time performance of its contactors. As stated earlier in this section of the report, this lack of monitoring appears to be inconsistent with 49 CFR 37.23(a). Based on the data collected by WT drivers on two days, WT is providing on-time pickups for 80 to 85% of its trips. A very small portion of pickups (less than one percent) are more than 15 minutes late. Based on this analysis, untimely pickups do not appear to impose a capacity constraint on ADA Complementary Paratransit service provided directly by WT. The on-time performance figures generated from WTs ongoing sample data is comparable to the figures generated from the two days of full data. Accordingly, WTs method for estimating on-time performance appears to produce results that are representative of the actual performance for all trips provided by WT vehicles. However, the fewer the number of trips analyzed for on-time performance, the higher the margin for error in calculations. For the data collected by drivers on two days, the portion of early pickups (before to the beginning of the window) was 9% and 13%. The potential for drivers to encourage riders to begin their trip earlier than they would like is a concern, given the percentage of early pickups. On-time performance for drop-off times for the two days of drop-off data was 66% and 81%. Two percent of drop-offs were between 15 and 30 minutes late; and one percent was more than 30 minutes late. Based on this relatively high percentage of untimely drop-offs, there is the potential for this performance to impose a capacity constraint on WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Findings Regarding Trip Length Wichita Transit and its contract carriers do not record pickup or drop-off times or measure and monitor ADA Complementary Paratransit trip duration. Based upon customer comments and input from operators, there may be instances of significantly long trips. For trips provided directly by Wichita Transit, travel time by ADA Complementary Paratransit service compares very favorably to travel time for a comparable fixed route trip. Of a sample of 25 trips, the average travel times was 23 minutes, while the average travel time for fixed route trip was 60 minutes. For only one trip was the travel time on ADA Complementary Paratransit service longer than fixed route. Based on sample data from August 13, 2002, the average length of trips directly provided by Wichita Transit was 24 minutes. Based on the sample data, 2.5% (3 of 121) of trips directly provided by Wichita Transit exceeded its travel time standard of 60 minutes. Of the trips served directly by WT, there appear to be no significantly long trips. Wichita Transits contractors did not have data available to evaluate their performance for lengthy trips. Wichita Transit does not monitor the trip lengths of its contactors. As stated earlier in this section of the report, this lack of monitoring appears to be inconsistent with 49 CFR 37.23(a). Findings Regarding Resources Wichita Transit has 24 drivers for its ADA Complementary Paratransit service, an increase of one since 2001. It has 19 vehicles available for service. The number of drivers and vehicles appear to be sufficient for the current and projected volume of trips that WT provides. Six contractors provide 70% of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit trips. The resources they use for this service goes far beyond the six vans that Wichita Transit leases to them. Contractors said that they want to maintain a relationship with WT, but want to set higher reimbursement rates. Wichita Transit has not forecast ADA Complementary Paratransit service expenditures to increase as quickly as ridership in 2003. Furthermore, it appears that WT is not anticipating an increase in the reimbursement rates that it will be paying its contractors. Observations Regarding ADA Complementary Paratransit Eligibility & Other Service Criteria The assessment team reviewed the process that Wichita Transit uses to determine ADA Complementary Paratransit eligibility ascertain whether Wichita Transit makes determinations in a way that accurately reflects the functional ability of applicants. The assessment team also reviewed the timeliness of processing requests for eligibility. The assessment team performed the following activities: Interviews with riders to gain their views about the eligibility determination process. An interview with the Wichita Transit staff person who handles the application process. A review of application materials to develop an understanding of the handling and review of applications. An examination of records for 147 applications, and a calculation of the processing time for each. Other service access issues were reviewed including: Service area Service days and hours Suspension policy Consumer Comments In a letter file that mostly related to ADA eligibility determinations, Wichita Transit had four letters complaining about service suspensions related to no-shows. None of the consumer interviews referred to the eligibility determination process as an impediment to service access. Eligibility Determination Procedures and Practices At the end of 2000, there were 4,122 individuals certified for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. As of July 2002, Wichita Transit had 4,913 individuals certified for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. This represents an increase of 19.1% over 19 months, or an average of 42 additional certified individuals per month. Wichita Transits Special Services Manager is responsible for eligibility determination. He reviews all applications received by WT. At the time of the assessment teams visit, WT did not conduct a medical or functional assessment as part of the eligibility determination process. The eligibility determination process consists of the following steps. The majority of inquiries about new eligibility come from local social service agencies that are acting on behalf of their clients. These agencies have blank copies of WTs application for ADA Complementary Paratransit service (Attachment D). For other potential applicants, the Special Services division mails a copy of the application with a cover letter (Attachment E). A copy of the application may also be downloaded from WTs web site. There is a single three-page application for all types of disabilities. One page is a Verification of Disability or Handicap that is to be completed by an applicants physician or agency official. The applicant completes the application, signs it, and returns it to WT. WT accepts faxed or mailed applications. The Special Services Manager estimated that more than half of the applications that he received were completed by agencies on behalf of their respective clients and faxed to WT. A special services staff member date stamps each application as WT receives it. The Special Services Manager reviews each completed application. If he approves an applicant for service, an approval letter is prepared and mailed to the applicant (Attachment F). This letter serves as the required documentation (49 CFR 37.125(e)) stating that the individual is ADA paratransit eligible. With the approval letter, WT also sends a copy of its Guide to Paratransit Services. If the Special Services Manager denies an application for ADA Complementary Paratransit service, he prepares a letter that includes the specific reasons for the denial (Attachment G). He also includes a copy of WTs Paratransit Appeal Process (Attachment H). All approved applicants receive full, unconditional access to ADA Complementary Paratransit service. The assessment team noted two concerns with the eligibility determination process. First, applicants who were denied eligibility included those who had submitted incomplete applications. The denial letter noted that an incomplete application was the reason for the denial. Second, under WTs appeal process, the General Manager oversees the appeal hearing and makes the decision on the appeal. While the General Manager is not involved with the initial decision to deny eligibility, he is the supervisor (two levels above) of the Special Services Manager. This appears to conflict with DOT ADA regulatory requirements for separation of function in the appeals process at 49 CFR section 37.125(g)(2). Review of Application Processing Times The assessment team reviewed a sample of eligibility applications, both denied and approved, from 2001 and early 2002 to determine the processing time for applications. Based on this sample, WT does a very good job in processing applications. Table V.1 summarizes the processing time for the sample of applications. Table V.1 ( Processing Time for Applications For ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Sample Size Applications Processed In One Day Same Day Maximum Processing TimeApproved 120 110 6 daysDenied 27 23 4 days The Special Services Manager said that the promptness of reviewing the applications was due in large part to their simplicity. He considered the current application as close to self-certification. He intends to revise the application process to try to assess the applicants in more detail, and he also wants to institute a system of recertification. At the time of the assessment teams site visit, approved applicants for WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit service received lifetime eligibility. Service Suspensions Wichita Transit has a Paratransit No-Show Policy. A no-show is defined as when a rider does not appear for a scheduled trip or cancels a trip less than 60 minutes before the scheduled pickup time. These are the potential consequences for no-shows within any 90-day period: First no-show: a review of WTs no-show policy for the rider. Second no-show: a review of the no-show policy and a written warning. Third no-show: loss of subscription privileges and a $5.00 charge. Fourth no-show: 30-day suspension of service and a $5.00 charge. If a rider is suspended for a second time within 12 months, the second suspension lasts for six months. In addition, for the third and fourth no-shows, Wichita Transit does not allow the rider to resume riding until he has paid the $5.00 charge. A rider may appeal any of these sanctions according to Wichita Transits appeal procedure. Service Parameters ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Area The Wichita Transit provides ADA Complementary Paratransit service to all locations within the Wichita city limits ( even for addresses that are more than 3/4-miles from any fixed route. Service is also available outside the city limits in areas within 3/4-mile of all fixed routes. New annexations are added to the service area as appropriate. Days and Hours of Service The DOT ADA regulations require that ADA Complementary Paratransit service be available during the same hours and days as fixed route service (49 CFR 37.131(e)). Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service operates from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday. However, most of WTs fixed routes have longer hours of service, both on weekdays and Saturdays. For example, on weekdays, the South Main route heading away from the Transit Center makes its first pickup as early as 5:22 a.m. and makes its last drop-off as late as 6:45 p.m. On Saturdays, the South Main route makes its first pickup as early as 6:22 a.m. and makes its last drop-off as late as 5:45 p.m. Fares The fare for Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service is $2.00 twice the base fare of its fixed route bus routes. The trolley service that WT operates on Saturdays has a fare of 25 cents. While WT states that trolleys provide charter and special services, and is treated as a separate division from WT [buses], the trolley is fixed route service subject to the requirements of ADA Complementary Paratransit service. This means that any ADA Complementary Paratransit trip within 3/4-mile of the trolley route during the time that the route is in service should have a fare no greater than twice the trolley fare, or 50 cents. Findings The title of the form included in Wichita Transits application for ADA Complementary Paratransit service, Verification of Disability or Handicap, uses outdated and unacceptable language. The word handicap should be removed from the title. Wichita Transit treats incomplete applications for ADA Complementary Paratransit service in the same way that it treats denied applications ( with denial letters. The eligibility process as discussed in the DOT ADA regulations describes completion of the application process by the applicant (submission of a complete application) and a determination of eligibility by the transit entity as sequential steps. A determination that an applicant is not eligible for service based upon an incomplete application could result in otherwise eligible applicants not receiving service. Based on a sample of applications reviewed by the assessment team, Wichita Transit is very prompt in making eligibility determinations. Of 120 approved applications, 110 were processed in one day or less, with none needing more than six days. Of 27 denied applications, 23 were processed in one day or less, with none requiring more than four days. WT does not appear to review applicants to determine whether or not they are able to use fixed route service. According to WTs Special Services Manager, the application form was essentially a self-certification and did not strictly limit ADA paratransit eligibility (49 CFR 37.125(a)). Efforts to serve trips to a large number of people who are not eligible for ADA Complementary Paratransit service could tax operating capacity and diminish service levels for ADA eligible riders. The Wichita Transit General Manager is the sole individual who makes the decision on eligibility appeals. He is the supervisor (two levels above) of the Special Services Manager, who makes the initial determination of eligibility. This procedure may conflict with DOT ADA regulatory requirements for separation of function in the appeals process at 49 CFR section 37.125(g)(2). Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service operates from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays and 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday. However, service on most of WTs fixed routes starts earlier and ends later, both on weekdays and Saturdays. The DOT ADA regulations at 49 CFR 37.131(e) require that ADA Complementary Paratransit service be available throughout the same hours and days as the entitys fixed route service. Wichita Transit appears to provide service to all areas within 3/4-mile of its fixed route services. During the hours when its trolley is in service, the fare that WT charges for ADA Complementary Paratransit trips in the area served by the trolley route ($2.00) exceeds the allowable fare (50 cents). Recommendations Wichita Transit should revise its application for ADA Complementary Paratransit service to help the staff to better assess an applicants true need for service. Wichita Transit should also change the name of Verification of Disability or Handicap form. Rather than sending a denial letter, Wichita Transit should revise its procedures for incomplete applications by advising applicants that their application is incomplete and requesting the applicant to provide the missing information. Wichita Transit should revise its appeals process so that the General Manager does not participate. WT could still have a WT staff member hear the appeals if that person is not a direct supervisor or subordinate of the Special Services Manager. The individual(s) who hears the appeals may also be someone who does not work for WT. During the assessment, the Special Services Manager mentioned possible candidates, such as the citys ADA officer and professionals with experience working with individuals with disabilities. Wichita Transit must adjust its ADA Complementary Paratransit service hours to match the hours of its fixed route service. Observations Regarding Telephone Capacity & Trip Reservations The purpose of the assessment teams review of the telephone system and trip reservation process was to determine whether riders who use Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service can effectively reach call takers and have their trip requests scheduled. Information reviewed and observations made on telephone service and capacity and reservations included: Consumer interviews and a review of complaints filed with Wichita Transit. A review of Wichita Transits policies and procedures for taking trip reservations for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Direct observations of call taking practices in the reservations office. A review of data of telephone calls directed to Wichita Transits special services. The discussion in this section of the report applies to ADA Complementary Paratransit service provided by Wichita Transits own staff and vehicles. All trips provided by WTs contractors are arranged by the rider directly with the contractor. Section VIII of this report discusses the service provided by the contractors. Consumer Comments During the assessment teams telephone interviews, several riders of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service complained about having to call everyday prior to a pickup to reconfirm the actual pickup time. One customer complained that on occasion she could not get on the schedule. On the other hand, customers also complimented Wichita Transit for improving the service over the past several years and the helpfulness of the schedulers. None of the formal complaints filed with Wichita Transit was related to telephone access or making trip requests. Review of Reservations Policies and Procedures Wichita Transit established two standards for responding to calls to special services: Answer all calls on or before the fourth ring (20 seconds) Have less than one percent of calls abandoned Wichita Transits policy is to not accept same-day or will-call trip requests. Wichita Transit accepts trip requests from one to 14 days in advance. WT staff believed that most requests for demand trips are made one day ahead (most requests for Monday demand trips are made on the preceding Friday). Wichita Transit has three telephone lines for receiving reservations for special services. WT has three customer service clerks plus the special services manger who share the responsibilities for answering the phones. Normally, two people take calls from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday. The three clerks also share responsibility for scheduling, vehicle dispatching, and other administrative tasks. Trip reservations are accepted between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Calls not picked up are sent into a queue and are available for pickup from any of the three telephones. From 6 to 8 a.m. and 5 to 6 p.m., customers may call to cancel a trip request or confirm the time for a trip. There are no call takers on duty on the weekend. WT has an answering machine to take Monday trip requests on Saturday and Sunday. According to the Paratransit Services Guide, every effort will be made to fit Monday ride requests, which are requested on Sunday, into Mondays van schedules. WT staff said that most riders make requests for Monday trips by the previous Friday. Occasionally, riders may leave a trip request on the answering machine. They can leave messages requesting trips not just on Sunday, but anytime that the call takers are not taking trip requests directly. The only restriction is that the request must be made by at least 5 p.m. the day before service. WT staff checks the messages the next business morning. At the time of the assessment, Wichita Transit recorded all trip requests on paper. The actual volume of calls for trips was small. From January to July 2002, WTs average weekly ridership on its own vehicles was about 1,620. Routine trips (subscription service) comprised 80% of this total. This means that there were about 320 demand trips completed per week, which came from 360 trip requests per week (10% of WTs requests are either cancels or no-shows). This averaged to 72 trip requests per weekday. If one assumes an average of two trips requests (one round trip) per call, then WT averaged 36 calls for trips each weekday. When a rider calls to request a trip, the call taker writes the trip information on a trip request log: customer name, destination address, pickup time or drop-off/appointment time, and return pickup time. The log has a separate page for each date, going ahead 14 days if necessary. The call takers do not record the date that a request is made. For all demand trips, Wichita Transit requires the rider to call back to confirm the estimated pickup time. Call takers tell riders to call back between 5 and 6:30 p.m. on the day before service. If WT has not yet been able to schedule the trip, the call taker asks the rider to call again on the morning of the day of service (see Section VII for a discussion of WTs scheduling practices). Observations of Wichita Transits Reservations Practices The assessment team observed the Wichita Transit customer service clerks and Special Services Manager take trip requests on Monday afternoon, August 12 and Tuesday morning and afternoon, August 13. As discussed above, the clerks handled several responsibilities in addition to answering the phone. Customers called for a variety of reasons: To make a trip request To confirm ride times To ask, Wheres my ride? To cancel trip requests To reschedule trip requests To obtain service information, e.g., eligibility, fares Team members made the following observations about the call takers practices: Team members did not observe any trip denials. The call takers had little trouble in taking the requests for demand trips by hand. They were familiar with many of the callers, and their destinations and even their requested pickup times. In practice, call takers accepted requests for same-day or will-call service if the schedules could accommodate the trips. Call backs from riders to confirm trips began at 3 p.m., even before the schedules were complete for the following day. Before May 2002, Wichita Transit did not accept trip requests after 3 p.m. Some riders were still in the habit of calling after 3p.m. based on the previous schedule for the reservations lines. In confirming pickup times with customers, call takers sometimes recited the pickup in terms of the (10/+5 minute window. More often, they recited the precise schedule time, e.g., 8:30 rather than 8:20 to 8:35. Analysis of Telephone Call Data The assessment team analyzed telephone call data from February to July 2002. For this six-month period, there was an average of 3,528 calls per month. The following information comes from the analysis of call data: On average, calls were answered in 34 seconds, exceeding WTs standard to answer all calls on or before the fourth ring (20 seconds). On average, 10.3% of all calls were abandoned, also exceeding WTs standard of less than one percent of calls abandoned. The assessment team examined call data for the month of May in further detail to analyze trends in 15-minute increments during the day. The volume of incoming calls peaked from 8:15 to 9:15 a.m. and again between 3 and 4 p.m. The average wait time peaked at 4 p.m. at 107 seconds, with wait time near or above one minute from 3:15 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. There was also a morning peak for wait times (greater than one minute) at 8:15 a.m. Wichita Transit generally met its goal of answering within 20 seconds between noon and 1 p.m. Abandonment rates ranged from one percent to a high of 24%. Wichita Transit met its goal of one percent during only two 15-minute increments. The peak period was 4 to 5 p.m. There was also a peak for abandoned calls at 9:30 a.m. Findings The assessment team observed no trip denials. While the assessment team observed, call takers had little trouble recording requests for demand trips, which averaged 36 per weekday, on paper. On the initial call, call takers accept trip requests, but do not confirm pickup times with the customer. A rider who requests a demand trip must call back the day before the trip to confirm the times. If the trips have not yet been scheduled on a vehicle run, the rider must call again on the day of service. Requiring the customer to make two and sometimes three calls to reserve a trip may be overly burdensome and could discourage some customers from using the service. When confirming trip times with the customer, the call takers sometimes described the pickup schedule in terms of the -10/+5 minute window. More often, they indicated the precise schedule time. This practice could cause customer confusion on when to expect the vehicle to arrive. During the months of February to July 2002, Wichita Transits special services answered calls in 34 seconds, on average. In May 2002, average call waiting times of over one minute occurred from 3:15 to 4:45 p.m. WTs goal is to answer all calls within 20 seconds. Although telephone response times exceed WTs goal, it does not appear to be a significant impediment to customers scheduling trips. During the months of February to July 2002, callers to Wichita Transits special services abandoned 10% of calls. In May 2002, average abandonment rates during 15-minute increments ranged from one to 24%. Although the observed abandonment rate exceeds WTs goal of one percent, it does not appear to indicate a significant impediment in gaining access to call takers, particularly in view of the observed hold times. Recommendations Wichita Transit should eliminate the need for some riders to call two and sometimes three times to schedule a single trip. WT should consider accepting times as requested by customers as final scheduled times. If, for operating efficiency, the requested times need to be adjusted to a time outside of the pickup window but within 1 hour of the requested time, WT should assume responsibility for notifying riders of the schedule change. Conversion to an automated system for accepting and scheduling trip requests may enable call takers to schedule trips directly to runs and confirm the trips when the rider makes the request. To make it clear to customers when vehicles will arrive, Wichita Transit call takers should recite the pickup window to riders, rather than a precise pickup time, when confirming trip information. For example a vehicle will arrive between 7:50 and 8:05 a.m., rather than 8:00 a.m. Wichita Transit should analyze peaking of phone call volumes during certain periods of the day and re-assign staff to cover these periods, if it wishes to reach its goals for telephone hold times. WT should also consider adding a phone line. Observations Regarding Scheduling of Trip Requests The assessment team reviewed scheduling of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service trips requests. Information reviewed and observations on scheduling included: Consumer interviews and a review of complaints filed with Wichita Transit A review of Wichita Transits policies and procedures Interviews with the WTs schedulers The discussion in this section of the report applies to ADA Complementary Paratransit service provided by Wichita Transits own staff and vehicles. With the exception noted below, WTs contractors provide ADA Complementary Paratransit service only for their respective clients. Section VIII of this report discusses the service provided by the contractors. Consumer Comments During the assessment teams telephone interviews, one customer complained that on occasion she could not get on the schedule. Other customers complimented Wichita Transit for improvement in its service over the past several years and the helpfulness of the schedulers. None of the formal complaints filed with Wichita Transit was related to the scheduling of trip requests. Overview As discussed in Section VI of this report, weekday ridership for WTs own ADA Complementary Paratransit service averaged 1,620 one-way passenger trips per week during the first seven months of 2002. The daily weekday ridership generally ranged from 250 to 370 trips. Ridership tends to be higher on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, and lower on Fridays. The WT special services staff all take part in scheduling. The base of each days schedule is the routine trips, which comprise 80% of the ridership. The template for each days routine trips is kept on a spreadsheet. Each weekday template includes 14 runs: 12 runs operate from 6 a.m. to 6 pm. One run operates 6 to 9:30 a.m. and 2 to 6 p.m. One run operates 7 to 11 a.m. and 2 to 6 p.m. Saturday has either four or five runs, depending on demand. Changes to the routine trips (such as cancellations or temporary stops) are transferred from the Special Board( a handwritten list of subscription changes( to the daily scheduling template by hand. Starting at 9 a.m. of the day before service (or Friday for the following Monday), one of the special services staff begins to insert the demand trips listed on the trip request log into the schedule. WT receives additional requests for demand trips throughout the day until 5 p.m. The number of demand trips generally ranges from 50 to 80 one-way passenger trips per day. Pickups for both routine and demand trips are assigned to 15-minute slots (0, 15, 30, or 45 minutes after the hour). For trip requests that specify pickup times (most trips), the scheduler tries to accommodate the rider with the 15-minute slot for that time. If the rider requested an appointment/drop-off time, the scheduler estimates a pickup time for 30 or 45 minutes (or in rare cases, 60 minutes) before the requested time. For a given run, most slots have zero or one pickup. The scheduler judges if it is feasible to schedule two pickups in a single 15-minute slot. There are some trips that the morning scheduler cannot place on a run. These trips are noted on the Cant do board. The afternoon scheduler finishes the schedules for the following day, trying to insert as many of these trips onto vehicle runs. She also reviews all vehicle schedules and makes adjustments as necessary. By the beginning of the service day, there are usually some demand trips that have not been placed on a vehicle run. The number of unassigned trips ranges from 5 to 20 each weekday. These unassigned trips are placed on the Shoe-in list. Riders whose trips are on the Shoe-in list are required to make two calls to WT to confirm their trips. The dispatcher adds these trips to vehicle runs during the day of service, as cancellations and no-shows occur. Wichita Transit does not use its contract carriers to provide any demand trips. However, it does have agreements with two contractors (KETCH and Adult Day Services) to provide some of the routine trips of riders who are not clients of those agencies. Section VIII of this report provides a further discussion of the ADA Complementary Paratransit service that the contract carriers provide on behalf of Wichita Transit. Observations The greatest concern of the schedulers was the number of trips left on the Shoe-in list each day. The staff has been able to assign all trips on the Shoe-in list to vehicle runs. This is due to a combination of three factors: Openings in vehicle runs created by cancellations and no-shows. The skill of the staff to review vehicle runs to take advantage of the openings. The usual lack of traffic problems in Wichita that allows drivers to keep on or ahead of schedule. The assessment team analyzed the trips from the Shoe-in lists of six weekdays, August 6 to 13, 2002. The midday hours are the least busy period of the day. However, as presented in Table VII.1, 28 of the 68 trips on the lists for those six days (41percent) were requested for between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. As a result, a disproportionate number of riders with pickup times between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. are obligated to call WT two or three times to confirm their trip times. Table VII.1 ( Trips Requested Between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. On WTs Shoe-In List Date (all 2002)Total Trips In ListTrips on List, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.August 6144August 7103August 8113August 9159August 12115August 1374TOTAL6828 (41%) Findings As of August 2002, Wichita Transit was providing between 250 and 370 ADA Complementary Paratransit trips per weekday on its own vehicles. About 20% of these trips (50 to 80) were demand trips. WT staff was able assign these trips to vehicle runs by hand. The two senior schedulers appeared to have sufficient knowledge and skill to do this work. Based on a sample of trips from Shoe-in lists analyzed by the assessment team, it appears that from 11 a.m. to 1 pm., a disproportionate number of trip requests are on the lists. While no trip denials have recently occurred, this could potentially discourage riders from seeking to take trips during this time period. Recommendations Wichita Transit should seek to minimize number of trips on the Shoe-in list. As recommended in Section VI, Wichita Transit should consider confirming all trips on the day before service, and take the responsibility of making calls to the riders for any trips for which WT must make adjustments to pickup times. Observations Regarding Service Provision The assessment team reviewed the operations of Wichita Transit and its contractors to determine whether requested trips are being served effectively in a timely fashion and are not excessively long. Information reviewed and observations on operations and service delivery included: Consumer interviews and a review of complaints filed with Wichita Transit A review of Wichita Transit and contractor service policies and procedures Observations of Wichita Transit dispatch Site visits to contractors Interviews with nine drivers A review of trip manifests and analysis of Wichita Transit on-time performance Analysis of Wichita Transit service trip durations Consumer Comments During the assessment teams telephone interviews, a rider with visual impairments said that some drivers are not attentive to the customers needs, particularly, in directing individuals with visual impairments to the entrance of buildings. Other riders commented that Wichita Transit, including its drivers, had improved service in recent months. During the first six months of 2002, Wichita Transit recorded two formal complaints related to its drivers. One received in January 2002 stated that a WT driver was rude and did not sign a receipt at the nursing home. A second, received in June 2002, also alleged that a WT driver was discourteous. The driver was issued a warning. Wichita Transit Service Policies and Standards Wichita Transit has established service standards for trip denials, on-time performance, travel time, and missed trips. The service standards are described below. Trip Denials: Wichita Transit intends to provide 100% of all trips requested. During peak periods, staff will often negotiate a pickup or return time within one hour of the requested pickup time. WT does not consider trips turned down within this window as denials. On-Time Performance: Wichita Transit has a goal of 100% on-time performance within the pickup window of -10/+5 minutes of scheduled pickup time. Travel Time: The standard for any one-way trip is less than 60 minutes on board the vehicle, regardless of the trip distance. Missed Trips: Wichita Transit accommodates 100% of scheduled trips. Dispatch and Operations Overview As discussed earlier in this report, Wichita Transit takes requests for all demand trips. It also takes requests for routine (subscription) service for individuals who are not affiliated with one of the social service agencies that provide service for WT. Wichita Transit staff creates the vehicle schedules for these trip requests. Each service agency contractor develops its own vehicle schedules, using WT vehicles as well as its own vehicles. Each contractor also serves individuals who are not certified as eligible for ADA Complementary Paratransit service. More information on contractor operations appears later in this section of the report. WT Dispatch and Operations. All three Wichita Transit clerks shared responsibilities for call taking, scheduling, and dispatching. The Special Services Manager also made a point of answering calls each morning for an hour. Customers called for a variety of reasons: To make a trip request To confirm ride times To ask, Wheres my ride? To cancel trip requests To reschedule trip requests To obtain service information, e.g., eligibility, fares The major dispatch challenge for the clerks during the service day was to assign the trips on the Shoe-in list. They tracked no-shows and late cancellations on the office copies of the vehicle manifests. As new openings appeared on the manifests, they would see if one of the unassigned trips could fit, or if they could reassign other trips to make room for the shoe-in trips. The clerks radioed the drivers to reassign trips and to find out if drivers had time to carry additional trips. Drivers radioed in as needed: To report a no-show To report being behind schedule To ask for directions to a pickup or drop-off location To report a lunch break The van supervisor oversaw drivers and monitored service quality. She also handled customer complaints related to driving, discourtesy, equipment, emergencies, and safety related issues. She also conducted training for the van drivers. Wichita Transit had an unusual organizational structure for its ADA Complementary Paratransit service. The three clerks reported to the Special Services Manager. The drivers and van supervisor were part of WTs transportation division, so they did not report to the Special Services Manager. In fact, the van supervisors desk is in the office where the dispatchers for fixed route service work. Van drivers check in and out with her, rather than the special services clerks. One consequence of this organizational structure is that the van drivers have been reluctant to respond to requests from the Special Services Manager to record additional information on their manifests. Contract Carriers As of August 2002, Wichita Transit had contracts with six private social service agencies in a Van Lease/Purchased Transportation program. Wichita Transit leases a total of six vans ($1/year) to these agencies for ADA Complementary Paratransit service: Table VIII.1 Contract Carriers for WT and Leased Vans ContractorNumber of WT VansCatholic Charities Adult Day Services1Cerebral Palsy Research Foundation of Kansas (CPRFK)0Envision2Kansas Elks Training Center for the Handicapped (KETCH)1ResCare Kansas: Life Choices1Starkey, Inc.1 WT negotiated a reimbursement rate per passenger trip with each agency to provide ADA Complementary Paratransit service. The reimbursements rates range between $2.00 and $3.00 per passenger trip. Agencies are responsible for providing drivers, vehicle maintenance, and insurance. Each agency serves its own clients primarily via group, subscription trips. To be eligible for reimbursement, a client has to be ADA-certified. The agencies also have other clients who are not certified for ADA Complementary Paratransit service who receive transportation. In addition to the vans leased from Wichita Transit, each agency also has its own vehicles. The daily transportation operations of these six agencies are independent of call taking, scheduling, and vehicle operations of Wichita Transit. Each agency creates its own vehicle schedules and dispatches the vehicles. The only recent coordination had been that, when WT received new requests for subscription service, depending on the geographic location of the rider, WT has asked two of the contractors to provide these trips (KETCH for riders in the southeastern part of Wichita; Adult Day Services for riders in the western part of Wichita). Collectively, the six contractors provide 70 percent of the ADA Complementary Paratransit service in Wichita. Table VIII.2 presents ridership of Wichita Transit and its contractors. Table VIII.2 ( ADA Complementary Paratransit Ridership by Carrier Carrier2000 Trips2001 Trips% 2000 and 20012002 Trips (6 months)% 2002Wichita Transit73,11484,63031.8%41,91229.7Adult Day Services 14,762  11,921 5.46,5844.7CPRFK 18,285  14,617 6.65,5884.0Envision 6,153  10,297 3.36,0604.3KETCH 24,826  51,216 15.325,16217.8ResCare 722  29,789 6.118,51913.1Starkey 64,554  84,522 30.036,62525.9Other* 5,160  1,791 1.47160.5Total ADA Trips 207,576 288,783141,166* Former carriers no longer providing service as of August 2002 Members of the assessment team visited three of the contractors: Envision, KETCH, and Starkey. Representatives of the contractors said that they want to maintain a relationship with WT. They preferred the arrangement of being able to carry their own clients. This system allowed them to provide the level of personal service that they thought was appropriate. On the other hand, they believed that the existing reimbursement rates were too low. They said that they were not covering their costs with the payments from Wichita Transit. The contractors submit monthly reports to Wichita Transit. Those with WT vans provide a report with maintenance statistics for the van. Attachment I presents a sample monthly van report. The contractors also report the number of trips provided to each ADA Complementary Paratransit rider. WT does not have a standard format for the contractors to document the trips. Other information provided to WT varies by contractor. No contractor provides information on trip lengths, pickup and drop-off times, or on-time performance. WT does not monitor passenger trip lengths or on-time performance of any of its contractors. The WT General Manager stated that, because the contractors were serving their own clients, it was not necessary for WT to monitor the contractors service in the way that WT monitored the service that it directly provided. He also indicated that he did not want to increase the reporting burden on the contractors, which in turn would lead to the contractors requesting higher reimbursements due to the increased costs of collecting the information. Drivers The assessment team interviewed nine drivers (seven from Wichita Transit, one from Starkey, and one from Envision). The following provides a summary of their comments: Most drivers said that they received two weeks of training, including instructional videos, and instructions on pre-trip checks. Sensitivity training was primarily addressed through the videos. WT drivers had mixed evaluations concerning the vehicles. Several WT drivers said they wanted additional wheelchair straps in the case of malfunction. WT Drivers had mixed opinions of the vehicles. They were generally happier with the 2000 models. They said that air conditioning was a continuing maintenance problem and that some wheelchair straps were not usable because they were damaged. Several drivers said that the older vans have lifts that are unable to lift the heaviest passengers. Drivers also noted that maintenance problems are generally fixed quickly. Drivers for the contractors noted that their vehicles were old but serviceable. They looked forward to getting replacement vehicles. WT Drivers commented that the schedules are generally good. A few delays and problems do occur ( particularly with add-on trips ( but this was not a significant issue. WT drivers seem to understand WTs pickup window and the procedures for declaring passenger no-shows. WT drivers clear all changes to the schedule through dispatch, including determination of a no-show. Findings Wichita Transit has contracts with six private social service agencies in a Van Lease/ Purchased Transportation program. The agencies do not provide WT with information on trip lengths, pickup and drop-off times, or on-time performance. WT does not monitor passenger trip lengths or on-time performance of any of its contractors. As a result, there is no regular means of monitoring on-time performance and trip duration for contract carriers. This lack of monitoring appears to be inconsistent with 49 CFR 37.23(a), which requires a public entity using a contractor to provide demand responsive service to ensure that the private entity meets the requirements of this part that would apply to the public entity if the public entity itself provided the service. WT drivers had mixed evaluations concerning the vehicles. Some drivers mentioned problems with wheelchair straps and the capacity of certain wheelchair lifts. Both WT and contractor drivers noted that the older vans were less reliable than the newer vans. WT drivers appear to understand the WT procedures for declaring a passenger no-show. Recommendations Wichita Transit should monitor the service of its contractors to ensure that the service they are providing to their riders is meeting the service standards that WT meets for the riders that it serves directly. To accomplish this, WT should require its contractors to provide all information that will allow it to monitor compliance with WTs service policies, including scheduled and actual pickup and drop-off times for ADA Complementary service passenger trips, and reports on completed, and missed trips and on-time performance. Wichita Transit should ensure that its vehicles are in good repair, including wheelchair straps. Wichita Transit should test its wheelchair lifts to ensure that they meet the standards for weight load (49 CFR 38.23(b)(1)). Analysis of On-Time Performance The assessment team reviewed the Wichita Transits on-time performance policies and performance; analyzed WTs sample data for on-time pickups; and conducted a detailed analysis of pickup and drop-off data collected for this assessment. Policies and Procedures Wichita Transit considers trips to be on time if the van arrives within or before the pickup window. The pickup window is ten minutes prior to the scheduled pickup time to five minutes after. Wichita Transit has no goal or standards for on-time drop-offs. The Guide to Paratransit Services states: Specialized Services vehicles will arrive any time within a 15-minute window (10 minutes before through 5 minutes after the scheduled pickup time). For example if your pickup time is 8:00 a.m., the van will arrive sometime between 10 minutes before and 5 minutes after 8:00. You should be ready to board the vehicle immediately upon arrival. At 5 minutes past the pickup time, the vehicle will leave. If you did not board the vehicle you will receive a No-Show. Wichita Transit has a goal of 100% on-time trips. However, until late June 2002, WT collected no data to determine its on-time performance. WT drivers did not record the time of pickups or drop-offs. The driver manifests had space to record passenger fare type and odometer readings, but no space for times. Beginning June 24, 2002, as described below, WT began to collect sample data to measure its on-time performance. As of the time of the assessment teams visit, Wichita Transits contractors provided no information to WT concerning their on-time performance. The contracts between WT and its contractors do not require reporting for on-time performance. WT does not monitor the on-time performance of the contractors. Performance Analysis Wichita Transit has collected data for its ADA Complementary Paratransit service to determine on-time performance since late June 2002. This data only includes operations of its own drivers and vehicles. As a result, the analysis performed by the assessment team encompasses a limited portion of WTs operations. Beginning on June 24, 2002, WT selected three passenger trips per weekday for comparing scheduled versus actual pickup times. To collect the data for these three trips per day, the dispatcher randomly selected three routes, then picked one trip from each of the three routes and asked the drivers to radio in the time of the pickup for those trips. During the seven weeks prior to the assessment teams on-site visit, WT collected pickup times for 98 passenger trips. WT did not collect any data for drop-off times. During its visit to Wichita Transit, the assessment team requested that WT drivers record pickup and drop-off times for all trips. This data was collected on August 13 and 14 and used in the analysis that follows. Table VIII.3 shows the on-time performance for pickups for three samples: WTs trip sampling from June 24 to August 9, 2002, and the one-day samples for August 13 and August 14. For August 13, a sample of 121 trips was drawn from 12 runs. For August 14, a sample of 78 trips was drawn from seven runs. Early trips include trips for which the van arrived before the beginning of the pickup window. Table VIII.3 On-Time Performance of Pickups for WT Vehicles Sample PeriodNumber of TripsEarlyOn Time or EarlyLate <10 minsLate 10 to 15 minsLate >15 mins6/24-8/9983%85%8%5%2%August 131219%85%13%2%0%August 147813%81%10%8%1% Based on these three samples, Wichita Transit is providing on-time pickups for 80 to 85% of its trips ( significantly below its own goal of 100%. On the other hand, a very small portion of its pickups was more than 15 minutes late. For the two sample days, the early pickups comprised 9% and 13% of the total trips. Of concern is the possibility that drivers encourage riders to start their trips early, rather than customers willingly accepting early departures. Because the performance figures for WTs sample data is comparable to the figures generated by the assessment team, this analysis also indicates that the sample data that WT collects to measure on-time performance for pickups likely represents the actual performance for the trips provided by its own vehicles. However, the fewer the number of trips analyzed for on-time performance, the higher the margin for error in calculations. Table VIII.4 shows the on-time performance for drop-offs for samples from the two days when drivers were recording times for all passenger drop-offs. WT has no other data for on-time drop-offs. Table VIII.4 On-Time Performance of Drop-offs for WT Vehicles Sample PeriodNumber of TripsOn Time Late <15 minsLate 15 to 30 minsLate >30 minsAugust 1312166%31%2%1%August 147881%18%1%1% The on-time performance rate for drop-offs on August 13 is 66%. However, since drivers did not regularly collect this data, the manifests did not indicate whether individual trips were scheduled to particular drop-off times requested by customers (appointments for work, medical, etc.), or were return trips with no customer requested drop-off times. Therefore, the assessment team was not able to segregate the trips for which on-time performance for drop-offs is more crucial. Nevertheless, if this data represent a random sample of trips, then the on-time performance for trips with a requested drop-off time should be similar to the on-time performance for all trips. With a two-day average of over 20 percent late drop-offs, there is the potential for this performance to impose a capacity constraint on WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Findings Wichita Transit has a goal of 100% on-time trips, with a pickup window of 10/+5 minutes. However, WT did not measure its on-time performance until late June 2002, when its drivers began to collect information on pickup times. WT does not collect any data for drop-off times for appointments. Wichita Transits contractors do not collect or report information relating to on-time performance. Wichita Transit does not monitor the on-time performance of its contactors. As stated earlier in this section of the report, this lack of monitoring appears to be inconsistent with 49 CFR 37.23(a). Based on the data collected by WT drivers on two days, WT is providing on-time pickups for 80 to 85% of its trips. A very small portion of pickups (less than one percent) are more than 15 minutes late. Based on this limited analysis, untimely pickups do not appear to impose a capacity constraint on ADA Complementary Paratransit service provided directly by WT. The on-time performance figures generated from WTs ongoing sample data is comparable to the figures generated from the two days of full data. Accordingly, WTs method for estimating on-time performance appears to produce results that are representative of the actual performance for trips provided by WT vehicles. However, the fewer the number of trips analyzed for on-time performance, the higher the margin for error in calculations. For the data collected by drivers on two days, the portion of early pickups (before to the beginning of the window) was 9% and 13%. The potential for drivers to encourage riders to begin their trip earlier than they would like is a concern, given the percentage of early pickups. On-time performance for drop-off times for the two days of drop-off data was 66% and 81%. Two percent of drop-offs were between 15 and 30 minutes late, and 1% were more than 30 minutes late. Based on this relatively high percentage of untimely drop-offs, there is the potential for this performance to impose a capacity constraint on WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit service. Recommendations Wichita Transit should have its drivers record pickup times for all trips. In addition, its drivers show record drop-off times for all trips that have a specified drop-off (appointment) time. While the sample data for pickups collected by WT appears to confirm the assessment teams analysis, 100% data is valuable for responding to any passenger complaints concerning late pickups or drop-offs. WT should continue to track its on-time performance on a regular basis. Wichita Transit should have its contractors record and report pickup times and drop-off times for all ADA Complementary Paratransit service trips. WT should monitor the performance of its contractors and work with them to remedy any problems with on-time performance. Wichita Transit should monitor early pickups to assure that drivers are not encouraging customers to begin their trip before the pickup window when they do not wish to do so. Analysis of Trip Length The Wichita Transit standard for trip lengths for ADA Complementary Paratransit trips is that the maximum on-board time for a customer is 60 minutes, regardless of the trip distance. The DOT ADA regulations require that the operator not limit availability of ADA Complementary Paratransit service by patterns or practices that result in substantial numbers of trips with excessive trip lengths, comparable to the level of service on fixed route service. For purpose of review, the assessment teams approach was to compare trip length, or duration, of ADA Complementary Paratransit trips with a similar trip at the same time between the same points on the fixed route system. Customer Comments Among the customer interviews, several riders who received subscription service from the contractors noted that they were regularly on the vehicle for more than one hour. None of the written complaints collected by Wichita Transit and reviewed by the assessment team related to long trips. Travel Time Analysis During a site visit to one of the contractors, a transportation coordinator stated that many of its vehicle runs are group trips, and many passengers regularly ride for 90 minutes or more. Because WT drivers do not customarily record pickup and drop-off times, a direct comparison between paratransit and fixed route service was difficult to make. While on site, the assessment team asked WT to have its drivers record their actual pickup and drop-off times. This provided the data for the assessment team to perform a travel time analysis. A sample of 121 trips from August 13, 2002 was included in this analysis. A subset of 25 trips was drawn from the 121 trips sampled on August 13 to analyze trip length in more detail. The trips were selected to cover a broad geographic area, including both demand and subscription trips. The scheduled and actual paratransit trip information was recorded, including pickup and drop-off times, and actual odometer readings. With the assistance of WTs receptionist, a team member developed itineraries for fixed route trips comparable to each of the ADA Complementary Paratransit trips in the sample. She calculated the start and end times for comparable fixed route trips, including transfer times, for each trip. The itineraries were based on scheduled drop-off times for going trips and scheduled pickup times for return trips. An allowance for travel time to and from bus stops was added to derive a total travel time for each trip: 10 minutes for less than 2 blocks 15 minutes for 2 to 5 blocks 20 minutes for more than 5 blocks Table VIII.5 presents the comparison of travel times for the subset of 25 trips to the derived travel times for the respective comparable trips using fixed route. It should be noted that this analysis was performed only for trips directly provided by WT. No information was available from the contractors who lease vehicles from WT and provide trips for their own clients. Table VIII.5 Comparison of Travel Times on Paratransit vs. Fixed Route for Selected Trips on August 13, 2002 ADA ParatransitFixed-RouteTravel TimeOrigin+ (all Wichita)Destination+ (all Wichita)Pickup Time (a.m. unless noted)Actual Travel Time (mins)On-board Travel Time (mins)Number of TransfersAllowance for Walking (mins)Total Travel Time (mins)Difference (ADA ( FR)Ratio (ADA/FR)400 N Yale5900 W Central8:15748521095-210.81600 S Glendale1100 N Emporia11:15253011040-150.61000 E Second1500 E Berkeley3:00 p.m.153511550-350.32800 N Keith Ct900 N Country Acres7:0082502045-370.23000 S Oliver4500 S Charles1:15 p.m.127011585-730.11300 N West St3400 Zoo Blvd4:30 p.m.2501520-100.16800 E Zimberly3100 N Mead6:45155511570-550.21300 S Pinecrest2300 S Water9:00394011555-160.7300 N Rock Road4200 S Hydraulic12:15 p.m.2595110105-800.23600 W 13th300 N McLean10:00292001030-11.0600 W Douglas500 E Pawnee10:00103011040-300.31000 S Topeka500 S Meridian9:15152011535-200.4300 N Hillside600 N Edgemoor2:45 p.m.341001020+141.71400 N High St2300 S Water8:45105021060-580.25900 W Central1400 N Spruce 4:15 p.m.285521065-370.4500 S Meridian1000 S Topeka3:15 p.m.102011030-200.32000 N Old Manor11600 E 13th St N10:00156013 miles*80-65*0.2*2500 S Custer11700 E Waterman3:45 p.m.4595220115-700.42300 S Water11700 E Waterman8:004080120100-600.4100 W 24th St5400 W Eighth6:003495210105-710.34000 Sayles1300 S Terrace10:15225011565-430.31000 N Kansas2300 W First5:00 p.m.273011040-130.83200 N Coolidge300 Riverview3:00 p.m.121501530-180.49600 E Bayley300 N Hillside10:15147511085-710.23500 W Eighth1500 W 22nd3:00 p.m.144511055-410.3AverageN/A2348113*60-380.4* Not included in the averages + Addresses have been rounded off to protect the passengers identities. Comparison of Paratransit and Fixed Route Travel Times In the sample of 121 trips taken from August 13, 2002, the average travel time was 24 minutes, with a range of four to 84 minutes. Only three trips were more than one hour in duration. Using the subset of 25 trips, the average paratransit travel time was 23 minutes. The shortest trip was two minutes; the longest was 74 minutes. Only one trip exceeded the one-hour maximum travel time standard established by Wichita Transit. The actual odometer readings for those trips averaged seven miles, ranging from one to 21 miles. For the subset of 25 trips, the average travel time for comparable trips on fixed route was 60 minutes, including an allowance for traveling to/from the bus stop and transfer times, as described above. The travel times ranged from 20 to 115 minutes. One trip had a destination that was more than three miles from the end of the route. The travel time for that trip was not included in the average. Paratransit service provided by Wichita Transit compares very favorably to the average fixed route equivalent travel time. On average, the trip was estimated to be 36 minutes shorter on paratransit. The trip on ADA Complementary Paratransit service was longer in only one case and in that case by fourteen minutes. Findings Wichita Transit and its contract carriers do not record pickup or drop-off times or measure and monitor ADA Complementary Paratransit trip duration. Based upon customer comments and input from operators, there may be instances of significantly long trips. For trips provided directly by Wichita Transit, travel time by ADA Complementary Paratransit service compares very favorably to travel time for a comparable fixed route trip. Of a sample of 25 trips, the average travel times was 23 minutes, while the average travel time for fixed route trip was 60 minutes. For only one trip was the travel time on ADA Complementary Paratransit service longer than fixed route. Based on sample data from August 13, 2002, the average duration of trips directly provided by Wichita Transit was 24 minutes. Based on the sample data, 2.5% (3 of 121) of trips directly provided by Wichita Transit exceeded its travel time standard of 60 minutes. Of the trips served directly by WT, there does not appear to be a pattern or practice of providing significantly long trips. Wichita Transits contractors did not have data available to evaluate their performance for lengthy trips. Wichita Transit does not monitor the trip lengths of its contactors. As stated earlier in this section of the report, this lack of monitoring appears to be inconsistent with 49 CFR section 37.23(a). Recommendations Wichita Transit should have all drivers ( both its own and the contractor drivers ( record pickup and drop-off times for all passenger trips. Wichita Transit should conduct periodic analysis of long trips, including those served by contract carriers, to identify significantly long trips, if any, and assess patterns, e.g., relative to particular carriers, times of day, types of riders, or individual riders. If patterns of long trips are found, Wichita Transit should review its schedules and take corrective action as needed to eliminate the pattern and reduce the number of long trips. Resources The assessment team reviewed the resources provided by Wichita Transit for ADA Complementary Paratransit services in order to identify possible links between service limits and the resources available. The team reviewed Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service budget, staffing and equipment levels, and interviewed Wichita Transit staff. Policies and Procedures Wichita Transit is an agency of the City of Wichita, and its services and expenditures are authorized by the city. The citys fiscal year coincides with the calendar year. WTs General Manager and assistant director are responsible for preparing and submitting a proposed transit budget to the citys Budget Review Committee. In March of each year, the Budget Review Committee presents its citywide proposed budget for the following year. In August, the city adopts its budget for the following fiscal year. For Wichita Transit, the total budget in FY2002 is $5.449 million. This compares with actual expenditures of $4.961 million in FY2001 and $4.486 million in FY2000. The expenditures for Wichita Transit have been rising steadily over the past few years, due in large part to major capital purchases to enlarge and replace its fixed route and special services fleets. For its FY2003 budget, WT has proposed a decrease (2.4%) from FY2002. Wichita Transit draws money from the citys Transit Resource Fund. In addition to using this fund to pay for operating expenses, the fund also includes anticipated capital grant funds for use in future years. Ultimately, funding of WTs budget comes from three major sources. The largest source is the citys general funds, which in recent years has provided over 40%. State and FTA funds (including capital grants) together provide slightly less than 40%. Fares and other WT revenue comprise the remaining 20% Personnel & Equipment The assessment team reviewed the resources that Wichita Transit uses to provide ADA Complementary Paratransit service. This includes: Staff Vehicles Facilities and other equipment Contractor resources As of August 2002, Wichita Transit had 30 staff members dedicated to ADA Complementary Paratransit service. This included 24 drivers, one mechanic, three clerks, one field/driver supervisor and one manager. This was an increase of one driver and one clerk from FY2001. As of August 2002, Wichita Transit had a paratransit fleet that consisted of 21 lift-equipped vans, of which 19 were in active use. Eight of the 19 active vans were model year (MY) 2000; seven vans were MY1998; four were MY1997. Wichita Transit plans to replace the 1997 and 1998 vans during 2002 and 2003. WT has a sufficient number of vehicles to meet its peak fleet requirement of 14 vehicles. Under its Van Lease program, WT was providing a total of six vans to five of its contractors. These included five MY1995 and one MY1997. WT intends to replace most of these vans with the vans that are going to be replaced by the new purchases. Wichita Transit manages and operates its ADA Complementary Paratransit service from WTs main garage and administration building. The vans are parked there overnight. Some of the van maintenance is performed at the citys central maintenance facility. The city oversees the building and manages all services, including the telephones and computer system. The biggest change that Wichita Transit is planning for ADA Complementary Paratransit service is the purchase of software that automates trip requests, scheduling, and recordkeeping. Using its current procedures and equipment, WT office staff is able to operate and manage the service at its current volume. The benefits of automation will be more apparent if ridership continues to grow. The software can also be helpful in increasing monitoring and measuring of service, including service provided by the contractors. The six contractors provide 70% of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit trips. The resources they use for this service goes far beyond the six vans that Wichita Transit leases to them. Most of the ADA Complementary Paratransit trips that they provide are on non-Wichita Transit vehicles. Contractors provide and train the drivers for these trips. Contractors pay for gas and insurance. Contractors perform all vehicle maintenance. Contractors manage the daily operations. Wichita Transit reimburses each contractor on a per-passenger trip basis. The rates for the contractors range between $2.00 and $3.00; the rates have been the same for almost 10 years. The contractors keep the $2.00 fare for each trip, although the contractors do not charge a fare to some of their riders. In interviews with assessment team members, representatives of several of the contractors said that they want to maintain a relationship with WT, but want to set higher reimbursement rates. Budget The assessment team reviewed the budget information for ADA Complementary Paratransit service for the fiscal years 1999 through 2003. Table IX.1 presents a summary of the recent market and budget history of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit services. Figures for certified riders, ridership, and budget include service provided directly by Wichita Transit and by its contractors. Table IX.1 Budget Summary 200020012002 (6 mos.)2002 projected2003 proposedWichita Population344,284Certified Riders4,1224,6284,8875,137Riders per Capita (%)1.201.341.421.49Passenger Trips207,576288,783141,166308,370329,900% Trips Change from Previous Year39.13.76.87.0ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Expenditures (000)$1,073$1,671$1,720$1,781% Change in Expenditures55.72.93.5Cost per Trip $5.17$5.79$5.58$5.40 Notes: 1. Data for 2002 projected trips, budget, and expenditures from WT. 2. 2002 projected certified riders from assessment team estimate. 3. 2002 6-month ridership change compares June 2002 to June 2001. 4. Data for 2003 proposed trips, budget, and expenditures from WT. The ridership increased dramatically in 2001 because Sedgwick County (which includes Wichita) ended a rural transportation program. WT absorbed many trips previously served by the County program. In 2002, WT is projecting a more modest ridership growth of 6.8%. It projects similar growth in 2003. WT has not forecast expenditures to increase as quickly as ridership in 2003 ( as seen by a decrease in the projected cost per trip from 2002 to 2003. Furthermore, short of significant cost savings in other portions of its ADA Complementary Paratransit service, it appears that WT is not anticipating an increase in the reimbursement rates that it will be paying its contractors. A major change in the funding for Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit service took place in 2001. WT began to make use of FTAs Access to Jobs program to pay for certain trips. WT has certified the trips of certain passengers as eligible for reimbursement under an Access to Jobs grant project. All of these passengers have been clients of the contractors. Their Access to Job trips are all related work or job training. Since 2001, a third of WTs ADA Complementary Paratransit trips have been paid with Access to Jobs funds. Findings Wichita Transit has 24 drivers for its ADA Complementary Paratransit service, an increase of one since 2001. It has 19 vehicles available for service. The number of drivers and vehicles appear to be sufficient for the current and projected volume of trips that WT provides. Six contractors provide 70% of Wichita Transits ADA Complementary Paratransit trips. The resources they use for this service goes far beyond the six vans that Wichita Transit leases to them. Contractors said that they want to maintain a relationship with WT, but want to set higher reimbursement rates. Wichita Transit has not forecast ADA Complementary Paratransit service expenditures to increase as quickly as ridership in 2003. Furthermore, it appears that WT is not anticipating an increase in the reimbursement rates that it will be paying its contractors. Recommendations Wichita Transit should review its proposed 2003 budget for ADA Complementary Paratransit service to confirm that it will have the resources needed to meet the anticipated demand for service. Attachment A Response from Wichita Transit Attachment B On-Site Assessment Schedule ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Assessment Wichita Transit (WT) Wichita, Kansas August 12-15, 2002 Schedule TimeActivityWhoWhereMonday, August 12, 20021:00 p.m.Opening ConferenceAllWT1:30 p.m.Review information requested & policies & procedures with WT Managers AllWT2:30 p.m.Review budget and resources Review telephone system Review complaintsChia Loutzenheiser MathiasWT3:30 p.m.Observe call takers; record trip request informationAllWTTuesday, August 13, 20028:00 a.m.Review eligibility process Observe dispatch Interview carrier drivers and staffChia Mathias Loutzenheiser WT 11:00 a.m.Review budget and resources Review on-time performance Review trip durationChia Loutzenheiser Mathias WT1:30 p.m.Review service area, days & hours Interview carrier drivers and staff Interview driver, transportation coordinatorLoutzenheiser Chia Mathias Lloyd Starkey EnvisionWednesday, August 14, 20028:00 a.m.Continue on-time performance Continue trip duration analysis Continue eligibility analysisLoutzenheiser Mathias ChiaWT10:00 a.m. Interview driver, transportation coordinator Chia LloydKETCH1:30 p.m.Review other service issues Continue data analysisAllWTThursday, August 15, 2002MorningComplete preliminary data analysis & remaining detail work Prepare materials for debriefing session All WT1:00 p.m.Exit ConferenceAllWT Attachment C A Guide to Paratransit Services Attachment D Application for ADA Paratransit Eligibility Attachment E Cover Letter for Eligibility Application Attachment F Sample Letter of Approval For ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Attachment G Sample Denial Letter Attachment H Paratransit Appeals Process Attachment I Sample Monthly Report For WT Van Leased to Contractor PAGE  Wichita Transit: ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Assessment Final Report Page  PAGE 45 Wichita Transit: ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Assessment Final Report Wichita Transit: ADA Complementary Paratransit Service Assessment Final Report }~/03OPYZnopqǺÞúj{5Uj5U5 0J5aJ(j5>*B*Uph50J5j0J5U5]j5U] 5CJ$\ *5CJ 5CJ$aJ5CJ$ 5CJaJ5CJaJ6 *CJaJ5CJ 5*-Shi|}~$a$ h8p $a$$ h8p a$$ h8p a$j0123PY+{soC  x  h8p $a$   %&'()*+,-HIJKOPZ[\uvwxyz{|}ҦҌj]5Uj5>*B*Uphjg5Uj5>*B*Uphjq5Uj5U55] 0J5aJ(j0J5Uj5>*B*Uph0J557QRSlmnpqrstuMNOhijlmnopqԦԌj?5Uj5>*B*UphjI5Uj5>*B*Uph5jS5Uj5U55] 0J5aJ(j0J5Uj5>*B*Uph0J57  ! " # < = > @ A B C D E ` a b c e f } ~  j! Uj>*B*Uphj+U jU]0JaJ$j>*B*Uph0J j0JUj55Uj5U55] 0J5aJ(j0J5Uj5>*B*Uph2   ( F R s 4 @ V W c d ~  PQ-.  - !"!2!""$$%׹5CJaJ * *]aJ6aJ]aJ6]j5U]j 5Uj5U55] 0J5aJ(j 5>*B*Uph50J5j0J5U> F s 4 W  \ abP h8p  !px^p` !x px^p`xPQ-IJ23\S & F h8p Eƀ RF h8p  ! \p}~/0WHHH h8p S & F h8p Eƀ RFS & F h8p Eƀ RF0n WE42 !h8p  & F h8p S & F h8p Eƀ RFS & F h8p Eƀ RF  - . !3!p!US & F h8p Eƀ RF  & FF & FEƀ RF ! p!!!!""Z""WEEEE & F h8p S & F h8p Eƀ RF S & F h8p Eƀ RF ""#k###$$HS & F h8p Eƀ RF R & F hp Eƀ RF  h8p x$$$%%%%S&&&'?'k'yyy h8p ^ h8p P h8p Eƀ RF & F h8p %%%k'l'Q(R(..0022d4e4555555 6 6::(;);*;T<U<<<<K=L=x=y===>>->O>P>CCuEvEFFFFqGrGGGGGGGiIIIwJJqKrKsKKȻθ *\\560Jj 0J6U] 0J6]j0J6U]6] 5CJ\5\ *5CJCJ\5aJ *aJ *5CJDk'l'Q(R( ) )l))))**++..002233 h8p  & F h8p  h8p  !h8p 3484d4e444 5 55<5Q5r55555 666 h8p  & F h8p  h8p  !h8p  h8p ^6l7m7=999::);*;;T<U<<<<< $$$If  !$If$$a$<<#=9=K=L=U=f=x=y======x~~~~~~ $$$If  !$Ifm$$IfTl    0 j0    64 la== >>>->=>O>P>Q>>>?~x~vppp !$Ifm$$IfTl    0 j0    64 la $$$If  !$If ??A AAACCuEvEFFGG>HHHhIiIIIvJwJ h8p h^h !wJrKsKXQ 8p Eƀ RF^U & F h8p 8Eƀ RF^8sKLLVR 8p Eƀ RF^U & F h8p 8Eƀ RF^8KLLLMMMMMM NNNNN8P9PRRNRQRSSUUU:W;W]]]]]``ccgggh_qr8:ܶ/ bzhst a B*hph *aJaJ5CJ\aJ j-5CJ$6]5OJQJ\^J j-5\5\5CJ *L͓ۓ_$$IfTl  \ % y  T   b    0  64 lau $$$If]ۓܓl____ $$$If]$$IfTl  \ % y   T  b  0  64 lau '(glffddddd__ & F~]$$IfTl  \ % y   T  b  0  64 lau 45șə$%?@mn أ9 & Fx h^h`$ ! & F~9!Jxyu=> !8p x h8p 8p   & Ff !x ! & Fx|UT & F 8p 8Eƀ RF^8T & F 8p 8Eƀ RF^8|Ų^_qr9:ܶݶssssqq h8p  !h8p  !h8p  !T & F 8p 8Eƀ RF^8 ݶ޶56qθϸghEF bcz  & F* ! ! & FzghX ajlm & Fi & F & FR1$ & FR !  & F* !k`rs Yf"./r%'01JKq}}~kK=O|}5 5CJ\56 *aJ5OJQJ\^J j-5\5\ j-\ *\ 5CJ\\aJ5CJ\L1]xkRS h8p  & Fkxx & Fx ! & FiS_`rsUV[ h8p T & F 8p 8Eƀ RF^8[\\]XYfgOPDE & F & F hp  h8p "[rwd<$$IfTl    F1m  <  .  0    6    4 la $$$Ifa$$$If$$a$ k<e$If$$IfTl    F1m < . 0    6    4 la $$Ifa$  !$If<ypp<ypp@ypp $$Ifa$$If$$IfTl    F1m<.0    6    4 la <ypp $$Ifa$$If$$IfTl    F1m<.0    6    4 la%Lypp $$Ifa$$If$$IfTl    F1m < . 0    6    4 la%&'01E}}wppl}}ec & Fxx & Fx !$$IfTl    F1m  <  .  0    6    4 la EFab ;XKL !h8p T & F 8p 8Eƀ RF^8 h8p Lpq}U & F h8p 8Eƀ RF^8 h8p h^h h8p }~VG h8p U & F h8p 8Eƀ RF^8R 8p Eƀ RF^GH]]ZRRL !$ !$K p Eƀ RFU & F h8p 8Eƀ RF^8HKL;=[\p|} & F  & F* ! !}  G H S T        /0=>r!'+,2QW[\e&+,3SW[\lwĽĽȽĽȽĽȽĽȽĽȽĽȽĽȽĽε5B*\ph B*aJph\aJ5aJ\5OJQJ^JaJ j-5\ 5CJ\ *5OJQJ\^J5\ *\aJ5CJE  om$$IfTl    0     0    64 la $$$$Ifa$  !$If$$a$ !  E G { $$$$Ifa$  !$Ifm$$IfTl    0   0    64 laG H Q S T          0{{{Du{$If $$$$Ifa$  !$Ifm$$IfTl    0 0    64 la    P Q /0rz$$ !$Ifa$ $ !$If $$ !a$ !F:++$$ !$Ifa$ $ !$If$$IfTl    ֈD qDR                 0    64 la($$IfTl    ֈD qDR           0    64 la$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$!'+$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If+,2@MF:++$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If$$IfTl    ֈD qDR     0    64 laMQW[\&$$IfTl    pֈD qDR     0    64 la$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$\es$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$IfF:++$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If$$IfTl    ֈD qDR     0    64 la($$IfTl    ֈD qDR     0    64 la$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If F:++$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If$$IfTl    ֈD qDR     0    64 la&+,($$IfTl    ֈD qDR     0    64 la$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$,3AOSW[$$ !$Ifa$$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If[\blxF::+$$ !$Ifa$ $ !$If$$IfTl    ֈD qDR           0    64 lawx/$+,6"F"^%_%L&M&e&f&h'i'm'''f)C,D,Y,Z,2G2T2U2j2k2{2|222ƿƿƮƪƿ򒄒5OJPJQJ\^JaJ5OJQJ\^JaJ5B*CJ\aJph6]6B*]phB*CJaJph *B*ph B*ph5CJ j-CJ 5CJ\aJ CJ\aJ\aJ\ B*aJph5B*\ph 5\aJ4x$$$7$8$H$Ifa$ $ !$If$$ !$Ifa$F><<66 !$ !$$IfTl    ֈD qDR                 0    64 la#$,-]l !5"6"F"G"]$$=% & F hhx^hx & Fx & Fs !=%>%^%_%L&M&e&f&h'i'''f)g)++C,D,Y,Z,--//u0v02J !h8p x2 2G2U2e2k2|22222222222222222222tـFf #$IfFf $$Ifa$$If$a$22222222222222222222222222222222222222333333 3p3q3Z7777777777777778888 8 8 8 85B*\ph j-B*ph B*phPJaJaJCJOJPJQJ^JCJOJQJ^JCJaJ5OJPJQJ\^JaJ5OJQJ\^JaJE222222222333 3 34466N7Y7Z7777 $$$Ifa$$$If$$a$Ff$IfFf $$Ifa$77777777 $$$Ifa$77t$$IfT    ֈT' [G1'c       '4   '  'J  '  0    @2 22 22 22 22 24a77788 8 8 $$$Ifa$$$If 88p$$IfT    ֈT' [G1'c   '4 ''J'0    @2 22 22 22 22 24a 888888"8#8%8&8(8)8*8;;;;==CCIG J JJBKCKXKSStSuSSS T TTTTTTTTTTTTTU UU'U1U4UÿϵOJQJ\^JaJ *5CJCJ\ j-5CJOJQJ^JCJOJQJ^J5CJ5CJOJQJ^J5\ *aJ * 5CJ\aJ *B*aJph B*aJph5B*CJ\aJph B*phPJaJaJCJaJ58888#8&8)8 $$$Ifa$$$If)8*8+8$$IfT    ֈT' [G1'c     '4 ''J'0    @2 22 22 22 22 24a+8;;;;<=R? A$BCCCCEFIGbGcGHH J JJJBK ! & FD hhx^hx & FxBKCKXKYKLLMM&O'O+Q,QNQkQQQ1R2RSSuSvS$ h8p $Ifa$ ! & F 8p 8p  h8p vSwSSSSSS<$$IfTl4    r'>1    9  I 0    164 la$ h8p $Ifa$SSSSSS T T'T;TXTqTTTTTTTTTTTTT h8p $IfFf $$Ifa$$ h8p $Ifa$TTTTTTTTTTUUU UU'U1U4U7U9U[[[O]P]^^` `)`*``*abHcc & Fx 8p  !FfI$ h8p $Ifa$cNdeeee$f2ggggUiVinioiokpk&m'm-o.oDoEoooo & F & F !hhx^h ! & Fxooopp q!qrrssuuwwwwIxxxxyyzzz{{{$ & F & F{|||||||||||| $$Ifa$$If$a$ |||||||GA8888 $$Ifa$$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |  8             0    )"4 lan|||}}*}+}A}V}W}g}}}}}}}~~5~D~E~T~m~n~t~{~Ybc؈وBCLde}Ljkuˊ&A=_sM5OJQJ^J55CJ 5CJ(\ *5CJ(\ *5CJ(5CJ(aJ 5CJ\ j- *CJ5\5OJQJ\^JJ||}}}}#}>8$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8        0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$#})}*}+}A}F}K}>8$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8   0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$K}P}U}V}W}g}o}>8$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8   0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$o}w}}}}}}>8$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8   0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$}}}}}}}>\$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8   0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$}}~ ~ ~~~ $$Ifa$$If~~5~6~;~<~@~GA8888 $$Ifa$$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8   0    )"4 lan@~D~E~T~Z~`~a~>8$If$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |   8   0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$a~g~m~n~{~~><<$$IfTl    ֈ~ k + |    8        0    )"4 lan $$Ifa$~GQR78XYbcw$@&a$ & FFx & F hhx^h !` hh^h`hو /BCLQZ^d $$Ifa$$a$$@&a$de}ldc $$Ifa$$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 la}~GN & Fdh$Eƀ RFIf$Ifd$$Ifl4%d&  t 0d&4 laldfXff & F !$If$If$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 la":LQ_gj_SSSFFF  !x$If & Fx$If  !$If$$Iflg\FB%bT t0d&4 lagjku_U & F$If$$Iflg\FB%bT t0d&4 la  !$Ifˊjha $$Ifa$$$Iflg\FB%bT t0d&4 laˊ̊֊&+3ABEFGxx$If  !$If & F$If$Ifd$$Ifl4%d&  t 0d&4 la GHSojdZZZOOO  !$If & F$If$If$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 laɋ=b\RR\R & F|$If$If$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 lax$If=KLQY_`airsXp$$Ifl4@\FB%bT t0d&4 la$If  !$If s֌ wwww  !$If & F$If$Ifd$$Ifl4%d&  t 0d&4 la $$Ifa$ LMRXl0fZRGG  !$Ifx$If & Fzx$If$If$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 laMX^_45VWXfŽLMSTUZ[abdefgfjkǿ0J5\mHnHu 0J5\j0J5U\5CJOJQJ5CJ0J j0JU *CJ( *5CJ(\56CJ(\] 5CJ(\ *5CJ\5\5aJ1X^_i_YL & Fdh$If$If$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 la  !x$If  !x$If !dhx$IfK & F$Eƀ RFIfllc $$Ifa$$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 laǍJK & F3$Eƀ RFIf$Ifd$$Ifl4%d&  t 0d&4 la+,014$IfK & F$Eƀ RFIf45?lf$If$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 la?OSV$IfK & F7$Eƀ RFIfVWXefώЎlgggggggggg$a$$$Ifl\FB%bT t0d&4 la "LZ[p~TUfg &dP$h$dN]ha$ &dPh]h&`#$$a$fghijk$a$ &dPl&P+p,p-p.p1h/R!/ =!"#$%45672 00PP&PP/ =!"#$%+0&P1hP/ =!"#$%'&P1h0= /!"#$%$&P1h/ =!"#$%'&P1h/ =!"#$%0'&P1h/ =!"#8$8%0'&P1h/ =!"#$%0{DyK  _Toc25548807{DyK  _Toc25548807{DyK  _Toc25548808{DyK  _Toc25548808{DyK  _Toc25548809{DyK  _Toc25548809{DyK  _Toc25548810{DyK  _Toc25548810{DyK  _Toc25548811{DyK  _Toc25548811{DyK  _Toc25548812{DyK  _Toc25548812{DyK  _Toc25548813{DyK  _Toc25548813{DyK  _Toc25548814{DyK  _Toc25548814{DyK  _Toc25548815{DyK  _Toc25548815{DyK  _Toc25548816{DyK  _Toc25548816{DyK  _Toc25548817{DyK  _Toc255488177DyK -www.wichitagov.org/trans/WTA/paratransit.aspyK hhttp://www.wichitagov.org/trans/WTA/paratransit.asp$$IfT    ֞T' !'c          '4  '  'J  '  0    !2 22 22 22 22 24a$$IfT    ֞T' !'c       '4 ' 'J ' 0    !2 22 22 22 22 24a$$IfT    ֞T' !'c    '4''J'0    !2 22 22 22 22 24a$$IfT    ֞T' !'c      '4''J'0    !2 22 22 22 22 24a$$IfTl4      }#',>1         h  Z    Q 0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1         h  Z    Q 0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1    hZ  Q0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1         h  Z    Q 0    16((((4 la$$IfTl4      }#',>1       h  Z     Q 0    16$$$$4 laK i8@8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH V@V Heading 1&$ & Fc 8p @& 5CJ(aJF@F Heading 2$$ & Fc@&a$ 5CJ$aJFF Heading 3$$ & Fc@&a$ 5CJ0aJBB Heading 4$$ & Fc@&a$5aJ<< Heading 5$ & Fc@&5aJ@@ Heading 6$ & Fc@& 5CJ aJFF Heading 7$$ & Fc@&a$ 5CJ(aJFF Heading 8$$ & Fc@&a$ 5CJ aJF F Heading 9 $$ & Fc@&a$ 5CJ,aJ<A@< Default Paragraph Font2B@2 Body Text 5CJ(aJ0@0 Header  !aJ(U@( Hyperlink>*B*P@PTOC 1! 8$ x5]mHnHuF@FTOC 2 8$ x^]mHnHu&& TOC 3 ^, @R, Footer  !&)@a& Page NumberL6@rL List Bullet 2 & F ^aJFRF Body Text Indent 2 ^6]4P4 Body Text 2$a$aJ&@& TOC 4 ^&& TOC 5 ^&& TOC 6 ^&& TOC 7 ^&& TOC 8 ^&& TOC 9 ^ZC@Z Body Text Indent( h8p x^JYJ Document Map!-D M OJQJ^J("( Caption"5\F%@2F Envelope Return#CJOJQJ^JaJ@SB@ Body Text Indent 3 $h^h4QR4 Body Text 3% 5CJ\>V@a> FollowedHyperlink >*B* phnrn xl24T'dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$nn xl25T(dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$tt xl26Z)$dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$a$nn xl27T*dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$nn xl28T+dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$tt xl29Z,$dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$a$nn xl30T-dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$nn xl31T.dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$LL xl322/dd$d%dNO[$\$<< xl33!0dd$dN[$\$LL xl3421dd$d'dNQ[$\$<"< xl35!2dd%dO[$\$<2< xl36!3dd'dQ[$\$LBL xl3724dd%d&dOP[$\$<R< xl38!5dd&dP[$\$LbL xl3926dd&d'dPQ[$\$^r^ xl40C7dd$d%d&dNOP[$\$^^ xl41C8dd$d%d&dNOP[$\$nn xl42T9dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$nn xl43T:dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$nn xl44T;dd$d%d&d'dNOPQ[$\$^^ xl45C<dd%d&d'dOPQ[$\$^^ xl46C=dd%d&d'dOPQ[$\$^^ xl47C>dd%d&d'dOPQ[$\$^^ xl48C?dd%d&d'dOPQ[$\$dd xl49I@$dd$d%d&dNOP[$\$a$RR xl508A$dd$d&dNP[$\$a$d"d xl51IB$dd$d&d'dNPQ[$\$a$d2d xl52IC$dd$d%d&dNOP[$\$a$dBd xl53ID$dd$d&d'dNPQ[$\$a$^R^ xl54CEdd$d%d&dNOP[$\$LbL xl552Fdd$d&dNP[$\$^r^ xl56CGdd$d&d'dNPQ[$\$LL xl572Hdd$d&dNP[$\$^^ xl58CIdd$d&d'dNPQ[$\$HT@H Block TextJ]^6B*]phPOWلXknGp*-Shi|}~0123PY+{soCFs4W\ a b PQ-IJ23\p}~/0n-.3p"Zk !!!!S"""#?#k#l#Q$R$ % %l%%%%&&''**,,..//080d0e000 1 11<1Q1r11111 222l3m3=55566)7*77T8U888888#999K9L9U9f9x9y9999999 :::-:=:O:P:Q:::;;= ===??uAvABBCC>DDDhEiEEEvFwFrGsGHHIIIIIIJJJJ8L9LONQNOP PQQQQRTLV9XYYYYt[[\\\\]]t_`bcccc=e~ffffijkk+k,kSlmnpq|Ů^_qr9:ܲݲ޲56qδϴghEFпѿ bczghX ajlm1]xkRS_`rsUV[\\]XYfgOPDE"[rw%&'01EFab ;XKLpq}~GHKL;=[\p|} EGHQSTPQ/ 0 r z                     ! ' + , 2 @ M Q W [ \ e s                        & + , 3 A O S W [ \ b l x        #$,-]l56FG]  =!>!^!_!L"M"e"f"h#i###f%g%''C(D(Y(Z())++u,v,. .G.U.e.k.|............................/// / /0022N3Y3Z3333333333333344 4 44444#4&4)4*4+4777789R; =$>????ABICbCcCDD F FFFBGCGXGYGHHII&K'K+M,MNMkMMM1N2NOOuOvOwOOOOOOOOOOO P P'P;PXPqPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPQQQ QQ'Q1Q4Q7Q9QWWWOYPYZZ\ \)\*\\*]^H__N`aaaa$b2ccccUeVeneoeogpg&i'i-k.kDkEkkkkkkll m!mnnooqqssssIttttuuvvvwwwxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxyyyy#y)y*y+yAyFyKyPyUyVyWygyoywyyyyyyyyyyyyyz z zzzz5z6z;z!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!J0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!#0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!!0>!!0>!!0>!!0>!!0>!0>!0>!0>!0>!D!0>!D!0>!D!0>!c!00IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC!0IC!0IC!0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC`0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC#0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC`0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC0IC!0IC!0IC!0IC!0IC!0IC!0IC!0IC0IC0IC0IC 0IC 0IC 0ICc!00c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c!0c!0c!0c!0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c!0c!0c!0c!0c!0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c0c!0c!0c!0c0c0c0cF!0c0c`0c0c000i0i0i@0i00000000000000 00000 00000 0 0 0000000 0000000!0!0!0000000000!0!0!00000000|!0|!00|!00000000000000 0 0 0000000z 0000000 0 00000003 0 00000007 0000`000000000000000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 0 tttttttt %K]}w2 84UOY|Mk &.8@X P\0 p!"$k'36<=?wJsKLMQRatՁWۓ9|ݶzS[%EL}H G  +M\,[x=%22777 88)8+8BKvSST?UU8VV2WW:XX=YY0ZZco{||#}K}o}}}~@~a~~d}gˊG=sX4?Vk     !"#$%'()*+,-/012345679:;<=>?ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWYZ[\]^_`abjYno &()+J[vxy{RmpqsNilmo"=@ACb~qCCCk X%tX%tX%tX%tX%tX%tX%tX%tX%tX%tX%t̕Xy!!t@  @ 0(  B S  ?H0(  % _Hlt522528040 _Toc25548807 _Toc519408882 _Toc25548808 OLE_LINK2 OLE_LINK1 _Toc519408883 _Toc25548809 OLE_LINK10 _Toc25548810 _Toc519408885 _Toc25548811 OLE_LINK3 OLE_LINK14 _Toc518200646 _Toc25548812 _Toc519408887 _Toc25548813 _Toc25548814 _Toc519408889 OLE_LINK4 _Toc519408890 _Toc25548815 OLE_LINK9 _Toc519408891 _Toc25548816 OLE_LINK6 OLE_LINK8 _Hlk21430775 OLE_LINK12 OLE_LINK13 _Hlk24278194 _Hlt527451592 OLE_LINK5 _Toc25548817 OLE_LINK7 OLE_LINK11.."# 2 2U8O=s{n[ll>!>!:JCJCPPPPPPW*\c|l@ @@ @!"#$HHk#Q$22Q:P>|F|Θ<<:D6]!]!8;aCaCwVwVwVVVVWac6~<lGIil3Oil38AINOY'  ##R#j#m)|)**..00K0c022VV9XY{{}VVφчst`xڋ9D&KLZ!ҡ!uXp39!!EE*Xp-E{{etu{    ^!^!227799 = =????CCCCiajaqayaaa1c1c"f1fttuu-LUZemvvьތ BXY^lWolgastRxC:\Documents and Settings\wolgastR\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Wichita revised Draft Report.asd David ChiaAC:\DOCUME~1\Davidc\LOCALS~1\Temp\Wichita revised Draft Report.docDonald Kidston}\\Ntserver\planners\PROJECTS\1036 ADA Assessments 2002\KS6 Wichita Documentation\Draft Report\Wichita Draft Report 021213.doc David Chiaz\\Ntserver\planners\PROJECTS\1036 ADA Assessments 2002\KS6 Wichita Documentation\Follow Up\Wichita Final Report 030320.doc David Chiaz\\NTSERVER\PLANNERS\PROJECTS\1036 ADA Assessments 2002\KS6 Wichita Documentation\Follow Up\Wichita Final Report 030320.doc David Chiaz\\NTSERVER\PLANNERS\PROJECTS\1036 ADA Assessments 2002\KS6 Wichita Documentation\Follow Up\Wichita Final Report 030320.docWolgastR#O:\WOLGAST\Wichita Final Report.docWolgastRpC:\Documents and Settings\wolgastR\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Wichita Final Report.asdWolgastR#O:\WOLGAST\Wichita Final Report.docWolgastR#O:\WOLGAST\Wichita Final Report.docbhU*3@%PF& 6C~%[ %Ez|4ͨox d?%=/U&V9w Vc[wizT-+ zSJA:|G5 : K&(BMGV7H|$G(WP2; qmP  9P*#   PJ nr\  /4 hP.> zS  .Ch  TS d' 視r ,gSpM v~o *4"Y   ¨;V ƵP)<(Ph z "XiA#fl; )p,P j`O%X75(  >  Zv^C P6-7 -Ka2d^M <0P$* ~P3^^2<P P* fr$x!0|F m\h G%p zS 1p ]TB Pdo<28NhRs jpFFb2kY  S[Fj (f;a 4\ $j$ IX2l  N5Dl>|pvWRl7 )_>?=Z0= @\*¨CP( 5{! !@/!P!"|("X1]"P%9"^JhF#:?Xw M#MDW#J},Xp#ȏuj#<$`T@8+%~&*{N%Jh&mxg' T'2R.'t(h{2u*(  )_OG)zdt*3_* ^*4&~* lh*<c@+ ]ou+Pa+X4F9L6꿨PV6 W6 %\7"4?7VXB`@7۸9EF7~ujv77"A9nHP9 7z9bF Vu:>L}JT;r*?;|-;HI ='> `1K@4_V@|]PFeY@ |a@ ]@7@n; eAX1,,A:x3AveA  6A %_AVx{Ad^JnBԠkCyL>:#D$d j4\D aTDPjEX1oEO zEr7d#V'E qEF^8F @%FP=0G(yGDPNGRGd8QGP=) HRlf' 6HfO*H}q HFb2_I&IPgHIx<IK08 %KP-L _L>maLPMb jM.M4vTNbF:7N^PQ O zS|?EOd4OP:liPP @X=QB |,OQ2T6CyQ PQ zSRXR̼C5RbF 0R8P)R!00DR_ldS wSS iScQT+LSTHT TV8mbT[gT{TgTQ4FtT @T`D}/hUNbUVk=VA*Vx̲iV SV 6;VW zS!zW dwWP(+X4~PTXj`O2RhX`T@8$tXj>X"@X t9XPaY;$uY D"Y}\0Y UYP\nZ`/?[0oDE(~[PX[ƒXZ[,\K\b\gAH] zS5:]V]` K]v] .7^% hcg^ rz^Ra-^ ^PQ _ R9+_o("_'rR[`P`L> `zf."`bFna[$pa@~Yta PA;b` K-E`b4zIkbvªO!Oc0wHcn" dPH3d&$)dtWwVdR8?ie\h1e.rebF -f q)f\wg]N_whi~T*Qjiz#j =dTjPkujPTpj$)qj֋(IBj>P0k Mk 5k*uB:"l +lަ xGlbFb*ld&U/l9lL  2l rmBm zSKn,*%p ypPO5q>L0Kq q!Irq y~Eq 9Qr~b@rrrJ6rȮ >rPGwrTrB/#rZfsPc.s1HvgEsHj^r~Ssʲ+ws x>s?dHpsvXtU6NrtP%#uSu 7uXSRvB 'vܜfW-w$Ɯ? Fwf/ir0w FwBF ybuDy.r.yP@z Lz8 2{xR @{;IA{eQ^{fl;^d|5)w-|^Qp|xR4S|P}BFHi\~bFKG~W~{g~(_*,`;~b ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(*h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.hhh^h`.h88^8`CJOJQJo(.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.hh^h`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L. hh^h`OJQJo(h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.^`. hh^h`OJQJo(h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L. ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(88^8`B*OJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(o   ^ `OJQJo(   ^ `OJQJo( xx^x`OJQJo(o HH^H`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo(hh^h`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`. hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hh^h`.hh^h`.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h^`.h L ^ `L.h  ^ `.hxx^x`.hHLH^H`L.h^`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`. hh^h`OJQJo(^`o(.hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()^`CJOJQJo(^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`o(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.hh^h`.h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`56CJOJQJo(. hh^h`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo( hh^h`56CJo(.^`o(pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h hh^h`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hh^h`.hhh^h`o(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()hh^h`.hh^h`.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.hh^h`.hh^h`.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hh^h`.hh^h`.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h^`.h L ^ `L.h  ^ `.hxx^x`.hHLH^H`L.h^`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`56CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`B*OJ QJ o(php ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L. hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo( 88^8`OJQJo(-^`CJOJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo( 88^8`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo(   ^ `OJQJo(   ^ `OJQJo(o xx^x`OJQJo( HH^H`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.hh^h`. ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hh^h`. hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hh^h`.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.h^`CJOJQJo(.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.|^`|o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`56CJOJQJo(. hh^h`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.C88^8`o(-hh^h`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L. hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`CJOJQJo(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L. hh^h`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h^`o(.8^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(() hh^h`56CJo(.^`CJOJQJo(.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.^`.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`CJOJQJo(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L. hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(() hh^h`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`o(.hh^h`.hh^h`.  hh^h`56CJo(. ^`. pLp^p`L. @ @ ^@ `. ^`. L^`L. ^`. ^`. PLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( ^`56CJo(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.hh^h`o(. hh^h`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo( 88^8`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h88^8`.h^`.h L ^ `L.h  ^ `.hxx^x`.hHLH^H`L.h^`.h^`.hL^`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(opp^p`OJPJQJ^Jo(- @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hh^h`. hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.   ^ `OJQJo(   ^ `OJQJo(o   ^ `OJQJo( xx^x`OJQJo( HH^H`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo(h^`56CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`56CJOJQJo(. hh^h`OJQJo(-hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L. hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L. hh^h`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.h^`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(^`. hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`o(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L. hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`. hh^h`OJQJo(h^`.h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`.hh^h`.^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h ^`OJ QJ o(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.hh^h`.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L. hh^h`OJQJo( 88^8`OJQJo(-h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L. hh^h`OJQJo(h^`o(.^`o(. ^`56CJ o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`B*OJQJo(phh^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`CJOJQJ^JaJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`o(.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh XX^X`OJQJo(h ((^(`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(0^`0o(.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.hhh^h`CJOJQJo(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h ^`OJ QJ o(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(P^`P@@^@`.0^`0..``^``... ^` .... ^` ..... ^` ...... `^``....... 00^0`........ hh^h`OJQJo( hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hh^h`.^`CJOJQJo(hh^h`.hh^h`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`CJOJQJo(`^``o(.0^`0o(.^`o(.p ^p`o()@  ^@ `o(()x^`o(()H^`o(()^`o(()^`o(()hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^h`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h^`o(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`B*OJ QJ o(phph ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`. hh^h`OJQJo(^`o(.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hhh^h`CJOJQJo(.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L. hh^h`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L. hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`.h^`56CJOJQJo(.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L. hh^h`OJQJo(hh^h`.88^8`.L^`L.  ^ `.  ^ `.xLx^x`L.HH^H`.^`.L^`L.^`.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.hh^h`o(.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.hh^h`.h ^`OJQJo(h TT^T`OJQJo(oh $ $ ^$ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h dd^d`OJQJo(h 44^4`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hh^h`56CJOJQJo(.^`CJOJQJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`.^`CJOJQJo(0^`0B*CJOJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.hh^h`.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(^`o(.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh XX^X`OJQJo(h ((^(`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h^`CJOJQJo(.h^`o(.hpLp^p`Lo(.h@ @ ^@ `o(.h^`o(.hL^`Lo(.h^`o(.h^`o(.hPLP^P`Lo(. hh^h`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( hh^h`56CJo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.^`CJOJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(hh^h`.hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo(hhh^h`B*OJQJo(phh 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h88^8`o(.h^`.h L ^ `L.h  ^ `.hxx^x`.hHLH^H`L.h^`.h^`.hL^`L.^`o(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(^`CJOJQJo( 88^8`OJQJo(^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.^`. ^`OJQJo(hhh^h`.h88^8`.hL^`L.h  ^ `.h  ^ `.hxLx^x`L.hHH^H`.h^`.hL^`L.h hh^h`OJQJo(h 88^8`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(oh xx^x`OJQJo(h HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h88^8`B*OJQJo(phh ^`OJQJo(oh   ^ `OJQJo(h   ^ `OJQJo(h xx^x`OJQJo(oh HH^H`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(4?7f :h1e _LPV66-7l r0w|a@h;#j 2l5{!aws*(!~/@ziV`3wHc@%F %KqmTB 3@TUe, 9=S] >$*-P$uYw'>W66CyQveAhq)fiPPG5 6A( Su:"lFtT -fLST]ou+~ >rI<UY4S|$/&IKG~x3AwS/l|?EO(300=4\z8FQG75(_V@yp Z@_/t9Xhcg^\\ ^%kY  1p/!P0kMk&~*.Ch 9Nrt" dE(~[C<03maLkujaTD=0G<,]"=dTj!2<fs7.dwW.yy.{TrR[`N!"5!/4 Q^{A#H3dJA|r~SsS[?+lh*-E`b"`ldSHi\~vTNxGl5Re7z9@rr-^fx{AaYQ _^M~%["Y V'EHTF&Kq$3_*)da+^*(HD.xg'n-d' IKGwrTpj~EqFeY@ uDyF Hf.7^w M#/U VP%6;VW9l!zWoxG%p\0YgHI.> \3AH]j#Q$3mPQQ Oa-+L1gTO5q^p4Ytaj4\DP9/hU=) H%#uDR*# *%p4OIA{rz^>P-K 0R: KXtrG4?7 f NG )7@t(/#r^?="9L6M(yGo<2|("eAjE%\7#fW-w\nZ.'iSrmc.sT:7N6?[JnBI.dP)R'vhF# )ujv7_I! d?Ikb5kcQT(+XjM"A9TS Kn*V`?;OG)]@U0I\c@+(}/rE1>4R9+_-;("_h&M|F.X[%9"' 6H`1K@mbT,,A]PA;b @{*HRG6rna y)qj%Ez[wi:K<3{N%B`@7qEF >Xmpw-|Irq~o +%Z[;V QjiWRX$paT-SpM M.3 PIBjBM!OcSRvKJ/q^d|>:#DFw2RhX<$}] 2{Qp|Nhk=Vdt*>+lLzbU(rO-i;,#<l>SVP PTX7u.Mi%_A7x>s{g~RXRzE,OQ9Qr`; FwD"YgTkCVJT;N_wh5:]Hps`kkf-)Xp#0wgoEb\c/ $'wVdr P2H3a-L Vu:]$tX@X=QV?ieEF7_vgEsb*lJ EC1df @h 8^8`OJQJo(f! ^`OJQJo(of" pp^p`OJQJo(|f# @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(f$ ^`OJQJo(o<f% ^`OJQJo(f& ^`OJQJo(f' ^`OJQJo(o\f( PP^P`OJQJo(f l@h h^h`OJQJo( (0v0                  *                                  *                         v0                v0                          *        v0        q.H        *        \        *                                            v0                                   @        v0        ~8 ~R       @                                  @        *                                                                      /z                          *        z                 I.         /z                          )                          @                                   \                          )                          *       ,        *        q.H                 *                          \*                                  *        v0        *        )                 @                 \                          ~8                           @                         vY8zJ\2      @        \        ܂/        z        @                          @                 v0                          *                                                     @        @        $Cx{                                                    *8                                            @        *        *        @                 v0        *        *        @        /z                          @                 *        *8                 $Cx{                                   @        *        @                          I.                           *                 *        @                 z                          /z        *                                   @                         /z                          @        $Cx{                                            /z        @                 @        @                 @                                   @                                   @        7T8U88888#9K9L9U9x9y99999::-:O:P:9X\c}f;sy{ڋjHIU͏ۏ܏ x8"r%&0 EGHQST0 r z                 ! ' + , 2 @ M Q W [ \ e s                        & + , 3 A O S W [ \ l x      }G.U.e.k.|........................./// /T2333333333344 4 44444#4&4)4*47XGOuOvOwOOOOOOOO P'P;PXPqPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPQQQ QQ'Q1Q4Q7Q9Q> _Toc25548817>8 _Toc25548816>2 _Toc25548815>, _Toc25548814>& _Toc25548813>  _Toc25548812> _Toc25548811> _Toc25548810? _Toc25548809? _Toc25548808? _Toc25548807  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTUVWXZ[\]^_`iRoot Entry Fpv kData dK1Table/WordDocumentSummaryInformation(QDocumentSummaryInformation8YCompObjjObjectPoolpv pv   FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q