ࡱ> /1.  bjbj 4  4     _aaaaaa$     __ pO K08   : JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE RATING Please justify each appraisal element separately in the format below. QUANTITY OF WORK (e.g., production and timeliness): If, on the reverse side, you rated the employee outstanding or above average. In this particular element, provide written justification, preferably bullet type statements, explaining the reasons for that rating. No justification is needed for any other type of element rating. Use objective examples of work performance as much as possible. QUALITY OF WORK (e.g., accuracy, avoidance of errors, etc.): Same as above. COOPERATION (e.g., effective relationships): Same as above. INITIATIVE (e.g., originates improvements): Same as above. ENGLISH ABILITY (e.g., consistent with job requirements): Same as above. NOTE: Written justification for monetary awards must provide unequivocal proof of the employees exemplary service during the past 12 months. Facts and specifics are highly recommended. 124z{|  \ g # T X m hmLhmL5>*hmLhmLhmL5hLhhmLh5 hL5hmLh>*hH"h5>*1234z{|  [ \ ! " # $a$gdmL$a$gdH"21h:pmL/ =!p"#$% b 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~PJ_HmH nHsH tHD`D NormalCJ_HaJmH nHsH tHDA D Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List PK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3N)cbJ uV4(Tn 7_?m-ٛ{UBwznʜ"Z xJZp; {/<P;,)''KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd̛\17 pa>SR! 3K4'+rzQ TTIIvt]Kc⫲K#v5+|D~O@%\w_nN[L9KqgVhn R!y+Un;*&/HrT >>\ t=.Tġ S; Z~!P9giCڧ!# B,;X=ۻ,I2UWV9$lk=Aj;{AP79|s*Y;̠[MCۿhf]o{oY=1kyVV5E8Vk+֜\80X4D)!!?*|fv u"xA@T_q64)kڬuV7 t '%;i9s9x,ڎ-45xd8?ǘd/Y|t &LILJ`& -Gt/PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0C)theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]   8@0(  B S  ?1H"/)FmLLU`>!D@2222@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial;|i0BatangA$BCambria Math"hw2Gw2GfLL!pr43HP)?2!xx 0JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE RATING HAN, SU YONG'KIM, MIN KYO KR USAF PACAF 51 FSS/FSMCEOh+'0 ( H T ` lx4JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE RATINGHAN, SU YONGNormal(KIM, MIN KYO KR USAF PACAF 51 FSS/FSMCE2Microsoft Office Word@@v@ O@ OL՜.+,0$ hp  US Air Force 1JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE RATING Title  !"#$%'()*+,-0Root Entry F0U&O2Data  1TableWordDocumentSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8&CompObjr  F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q