PHL318 (Hegel) Essay Questions



PHL318 (Hegel) Essay Questions

Write an essay in response to one question from each of the two sets of questions below, making a total of two essays. Each essay should be around three pages of double-spaced typewritten text. Your essays should be written as clearly as possible, with careful attention paid to precision of concept and especially of definition. If you borrow ideas, please cite your source. Please do not slide exams under office doors or leave them in door boxes. Such exams disappear with disgusting regularity. Please get your exam into the hands of a living person. If you turn it into the philosophy department sectary, please have her time-stamp the exam to avoid any problems with possible late penalty.

Set I

1. Explain Hegel's distinction between the universal and the particular. For Hegel, what is important is the universal and not the particular. Hegel's own view is the extreme one that only the universal has genuine importance and that the particular is of no importance in itself. Make the strongest argument you can for Hegel's position. Marx, in contrast, claims that only the particular has importance. Make the strongest argument you can for Marx's position. Consider a third position: Both the universal and the particular have importance. Make the strongest argument you can for this position. Critically evaluate these three positions.

2. Explain what Hegel means by alienation. Make the strongest argument you can in favor of Hegel's position. Make the strongest argument you can against Hegel's position. Critically evaluate the disagreement. Marx criticizes "bourgeois" private property as a manifestation of a system of production and productive relations that alienates workers from their labor and from each other. Compare Hegel’s and Max’s doctrines of alienation. What is your examination of Hegel's views on freedom and alienation? 

3. In reading about Hegel's early attempts to formulate a conception of recognition and of ethical life, what general philosophical assumptions or claims do you find to be most problematic?  For example, are there dubious metaphysical or epistemological ideas animating his theoretical claims?  Explain how he is correct or not. Do you see anything about the ideas of recognition he is trying to develop that are essentially tied to such problematic assumptions or claims?

4. In the early Hegel Marx sees: “The appropriation of man's essential powers, which have become objects ... only an appropriation occurring in consciousness” while “the equally uncritical idealism of Hegel's later works - that philosophic dissolution and restoration of the existing empirical world”. Can you explain what is meant by these two criticisms?

5. Is Hegel's logic a transcendental ontology? Explain Hegel's metaphysical concept of the Absolute mind or idealism or spirit.  Select one of the components of the aspects of reality he discusses and explain it. How valid does this seem to you?  How did Hegel apply his dialectic concept (thesis, antithesis, synthesis) to history in general and to German history in particular? Some say Hegel used the method of: thesis-antithesis-synthesis (triplicity), and others deny this. Who is correct?

Set II

6. For Hegel, what is the essential purpose of history? What means brings about this purpose? In what form is this purpose ultimately realized? How is Hegel's view in opposition to those who view community (society/state) as a restriction of natural freedom? How would an origin myth (like the Christian Genesis) fit into Hegel's system of recorded history? Why?

7. Explain Hegel's metaphysical concept of the Absolute mind or idealism or spirit.  Select one of the components of the aspects of reality he discusses and explain it. How valid does this seem to you?  How valid is the concept of the spirit of the people?  Find examples from today's world to either support or contradict this idea. 

8. What is the difference between the social contract model of the State and Hegel's own model of it? What is the importance of religion for the State, in Hegel's view? Didn't Hegel say that the State is Divine, or even that the State is God? Between the individual and the state, which does Hegel feel should be superior if our goal is to achieve human happiness?  Why?  Explain your view. How is Hegel's view in opposition to those who view community (society/state) as a restriction of natural freedom?

9. In reading about Hegel's early attempts to formulate a conception of recognition and of ethical life, what general philosophical assumptions or claims do you find to be most problematic?  For example, are there dubious metaphysical or epistemological ideas animating his theoretical claims?  Do you see anything about the ideas of recognition he is trying to develop that are essentially tied to such problematic assumptions or claims?

10. Why, according to Hegel, is art superior to the works of nature? From what "universal and absolute need" does it spring, and how, does that need link it to "all acting and knowing"? How does Hegel moderate between those who say that art is merely a skill, and those who say that art is entirely a production of genius and not "a product of general human activity"?

11. Nonetheless, what defect does Classical art's success in relating Idea and shape lead to? How does Hegel define "spirit", and how, according to Hegel, must Classical artists have conceived of spirit when they represented it in "sensuously concrete form"? Again, how does romantic art's success also lead it to reach its point of failure? How is this problem similar to that of symbolic art? But what, according to Hegel, is "the essential difference" between the respective failures?

12. Is the claim that Hegel's philosophy and Hegel's religion have the same content? Is Hegel's romantic idealism another version of a "natural religion?" If so, does it have a cognitive as well as a moral character? Can it be used to show a religious dimension of thought and feeling in literature and poetry? How? Explain Hegel's theory of "alienation" as a result of "bad" religion. How and why did "bad religion" project an idea of a heaven?

13. Explain Marx's critique of Hegel's claim to have religion completely understood. Why did Marx react so strongly? What did Marx mean by “religion is the people’s opium,” "religious distress is the heart of a heartless world, a sigh of an oppressed creature, a spirit in a spiritless situation?" What is cognitive here?

14. In his Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, Hegel says: “Here in the Philosophy of Religion it is more especially God, reason in fact, that is the object; for God is essentially rational, rationality, which as Spirit is in and for itself. Now in speculating philosophically upon reason, we investigate knowledge, only we do it in such a way as to imply that we do not suppose we would want to complete this investigation beforehand outside of the object; on the contrary, the knowledge of reason is precisely the object with which we are concerned. It is of the very essence of Spirit to be for Spirit. That is just what Spirit is, and this consequently implies that finite spirit has been posited, and the relation of finite spirit, of finite reason to the divine, originates of itself within the Philosophy of Religion itself, and must be treated of there, and indeed in the very place where it first originates. It is this which constitutes the difference between a science and conjectures about a science; the latter are accidental; in so far, however, as they are thoughts, which relate to the matter itself, they must be included in its treatment, and they are in this case no longer mere chance bubbles of thought.” Do you agree him? Explain.

15. If as Hegel says "philosophy is the history of philosophy", then are all philosophical claims historically conditioned and liable to reevaluation? If you incline to an Hegelian or developmental view of disagreement, how do you explain the fact that a very large majority of philosophers think they are giving the truth once and for all? Are they all self-deceived? If so, how can this be explained? Or is it not in fact true that most philosophers think they are giving the truth once and for all? Some scholars indicate a wish to update Hegel for the 21st century. Does that mean removing all traces of his (presumably) un-scientific objective idealism?

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download