Want to Get Into College? Learn to Fail

READING SELECTIONS

Want to Get Into College? Learn to Fail

Education Week, February 1, 2012 By Angel B. P?rez

Commentary

1

I ask every student I interview for admission to my institution, Pitzer College,

the same question, "What do you look forward to the most in college?" I

was stunned and delighted recently when a student sat across from me at a

Starbucks in New York City and replied, "I look forward to the possibility of

failure." Of course, this is not how most students respond to the question

when sitting before the person who can make decisions about their academic

futures, but this young man took a risk.

2

"You see, my parents have never let me fail," he said. "When I want to take

a chance at something, they remind me it's not a safe route to take. Taking a

more rigorous course or trying an activity I may not succeed in, they tell me,

will ruin my chances at college admission. Even the sacrifice of staying up late

to do something unrelated to school, they see as a risk to my academic work

and college success."

3

I wish I could tell you this is an uncommon story, but kids all over the world

admit they are under tremendous pressure to be perfect. When I was traveling

in China last fall and asked a student what she did for fun, she replied: "I

thought I wasn't supposed to tell you that? I wouldn't want you to think I am

not serious about my work!"

4

Students are usually in shock when I chuckle and tell them I never expect

perfection. In fact, I prefer they not project it in their college applications.

Of course, this goes against everything they've been told and makes young

people uncomfortable. How could a dean of admission at one of America's

most selective institutions not want the best and the brightest? The reality is,

perfection doesn't exist, and we don't expect to see it in a college application.

In fact, admission officers tend to be skeptical of students who present

themselves as individuals without flaws.

4

These days, finding imperfections in a college application is like looking for a

needle in a haystack. Students try their best to hide factors they perceive to

be negative and only tell us things they believe we will find impressive. This is

supported by a secondary school culture where teachers are under pressure

to give students nothing less than an A, and counselors are told not to report

disciplinary infractions to colleges. Education agents in other countries are

known to falsify student transcripts, assuming that an outstanding GPA is the

ticket to admission.

5

Colleges respond to culture shifts, and admission officers are digging deeper

to find out who students really are outside of their trophies, medals, and test

scores. We get the most excited when we read an application that seems real.

It's so rare to hear stories of defeat and triumph that when we do, we cheer.

If their perspectives are of lessons learned or challenges overcome, these

applicants tend to jump to the top of the heap at highly selective colleges. We

believe an error in high school should not define the rest of your life, but how

you respond could shape you forever.

CSU EXPOSITORY READING AND WRITING COURSE | SEMESTER ONE

WHAT'S NEXT? THINKING ABOUT LIFE AFTER HIGH SCHOOL | 59

6

I've spent enough time in high schools to know teenagers will never be

perfect. They do silly things, mess up, fall down, and lack confidence. The

ability to bounce back is a fundamental life skill students have to learn on

their own. The lessons of failure can't be taught in a classroom; they are

experienced and reflected upon. During my weekend of interviews, another

student told me, "I'm ashamed to admit I failed precalculus, but I decided

to take it again and got a B-plus. I'm now taking calculus, and even though I

don't love it, I'm glad I pushed through!" I asked him what he learned from the

experience. "I learned to let go of shame," he said. "I realized that I can't let a

grade define my success. I also learned that if you want anything bad enough,

you can achieve it."

7

I smiled as I wrote his words down on the application-review form. This kid will

thrive on my campus. Not only will the faculty love him, but he has the coping

skills he needs to adjust to the rigors of life in a residential college setting.

Failure is about growth, learning, overcoming, and moving on. Let's allow

young people to fail. Not only will they learn something, it might even get them

into college.

Angel B. P?rez is the Vice President and Dean of Admission and Financial Aid at Pitzer College, in Claremont, Calif. He teaches in the College-Counseling Certification Program of the University of California, Los Angeles.

READING SELECTIONS

60 | WHAT'S NEXT? THINKING ABOUT LIFE AFTER HIGH SCHOOL

CSU EXPOSITORY READING AND WRITING COURSE | SEMESTER ONE

READING SELECTIONS

Hidden Intellectualism

An excerpt from They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing

By Gerald Graff

1

Everyone knows some young person who is impressively "street smart" but

does poorly in school. What a waste, we think, that one who is so intelligent

about so many things in life seems unable to apply that intelligence to

academic work. What doesn't occur to us, though, is that schools and colleges

might be at fault for missing the opportunity to tap into such street smarts and

channel them into good academic work.

2

Nor do we consider one of the major reasons why schools and colleges

overlook the intellectual potential of street smarts: the fact that we associate

those street smarts with anti-intellectual concerns. We associate the educated

life, the life of the mind, too narrowly and exclusively with subjects and texts

that we consider inherently weighty and academic. We assume that it's

possible to wax intellectual about Plato, Shakespeare, the French Revolution,

and nuclear fission, but not about cars, dating, fashion, sports, TV, or video

games.

3

The trouble with this assumption is that no necessary connection has ever

been established between any text or subject and the educational depth

and weight of the discussion it can generate. Real intellectuals turn any

subject, however lightweight it may seem, into grist for their mill through the

thoughtful questions they bring to it, whereas a dullard will find a way to drain

the interest out of the richest subject. That's why a George Orwell writing on

the cultural meanings of penny postcards is infinitely more substantial than the

cogitations of many professors on Shakespeare or globalization (104-16).

4

Students do need to read models of intellectually challenging writing-and

Orwell is a great one-if they are to become intellectuals themselves. But they

would be more prone to take on intellectual identities if we encouraged them

to do so at first on subjects that interest them rather than ones that interest

us.

5

I offer my own adolescent experience as a case in point. Until I entered

college, I hated books and cared only for sports. The only reading I cared to

do or could do was sports magazines, on which I became hooked; becoming

a regular reader of Sport magazine in the late forties, Sports Illustrated when

it began publishing in 1954, and the annual magazine guides to professional

baseball, football, and basketball. I also loved the sports novels for boys

of John R. Tunis and Clair Bee and autobiographies of sports stars like Joe

DiMaggio's Lucky to Be a Yankee and Bob Feller's Strikeout Story. In short,

I was your typical teenage anti-intellectual--or so I believed for a long time.

I have recently come to think, however, that my preference for sports over

schoolwork was not anti-intellectualism so much as intellectualism by other

means.

CSU EXPOSITORY READING AND WRITING COURSE | SEMESTER ONE

WHAT'S NEXT? THINKING ABOUT LIFE AFTER HIGH SCHOOL | 61

6

In the Chicago neighborhood I grew up in, which had become a melting

pot after World War II, our block was solidly middle class, but just a block

away--doubtless concentrated there the real estate companies--were

African Americans, Native Americans, and "hillbilly" whites who had recently

fled postwar joblessness in the South and Appalachia. Negotiating this class

boundary was a tricky matter. On the one hand, it was necessary to maintain

the boundary between "clean cut" boys like me and working class ``hoods," as

we called them, which meant that it was good to be openly smart in a bookish

sort of way. On the other hand, I was desperate for the approval of the hoods,

whom I encountered daily on the playing field and in the neighborhood, and for

this purpose it was not at all good to be book smart. The hoods would turn on

you if they sensed you were putting on airs over them: "Who you lookin' at,

smart ass?" as a leather jacketed youth once said to me as he relieved me of

my pocket change along with my self-respect.

7

I grew up torn then, between the need to prove I was smart and the fear

of a beating if I proved it too well; between the need not to jeopardize my

respectable future and the need to impress the hoods. As I lived it, the conflict

came down to a choice between being physically tough and being verbal. For

a boy in my neighborhood and elementary school, only being "tough" earned

you complete legitimacy. I still recall endless, complicated debates in his period

with my closest pals over who was "the toughest guy in the school." If you

were less than negligible as a fighter, as I was, you settled for the next best

thing, which was to be inarticulate, carefully hiding telltale marks of literacy like

correct grammar and pronunciation.

8

In one way, then, it would be hard to imagine an adolescence more

thoroughly anti-intellectual than mine. Yet in retrospect, I see that it's more

complicated, that I and the 1950s themselves were not simply hostile toward

intellectualism, but divided and ambivalent. When Marilyn Monroe married the

playwright Arthur Miller in 1956 after divorcing the retired baseball star Joe

DiMaggio, the symbolic triumph of geek over jock suggested the way the wind

was blowing. Even Elvis, according to his biographer Peter Guralnick, turns out

to have supported Adlai over Ike in the presidential election of 1956. "I don't

dig the intellectual bit," he told reporters. "But I'm telling you, man, he knows

the most" (327).

9

Though I too thought I did not "dig the intellectual bit," I see now that I was

unwittingly in training for it. The germs .had actually been planted in the

seemingly philistine debates about which boys were the toughest. I see now

that in the interminable analysis of sports teams, movies, and toughness that

my friends and I engaged in--a type of analysis, needless to say, that the real

toughs would never have stooped to--I was already betraying an allegiance

to the egghead world. I was practicing being an intellectual before I knew that

was what I wanted to be.

READING SELECTIONS

62 | WHAT'S NEXT? THINKING ABOUT LIFE AFTER HIGH SCHOOL

CSU EXPOSITORY READING AND WRITING COURSE | SEMESTER ONE

READING SELECTIONS

10 It was in these discussions with friends about toughness and sports, I think, and in my reading of sports books and magazines, that I began to learn the rudiments of the intellectual life: how to make an argument, weigh different kinds of evidence, move between particulars and generalizations, summarize the views of others, and enter a conversation about ideas. It was in reading and arguing about sports and toughness that I experienced what it felt like to propose a generalization, restate and respond to a counterargument, and perform other intellectualizing operations, including composing the kind of sentences I am writing now.

11 Only much later did it dawn on me that the sports world was more compelling than school because it was more intellectual than school, not less. Sports after all was full of challenging arguments, debates, problems for analysis, and intricate statistics that you could care about, as school conspicuously was not. I believe that street smarts beat out book smarts in our culture not because street smarts are nonintellectual, as we generally suppose, but because they satisfy an intellectual thirst more thoroughly than school culture, which seems pale and unreal.

12 They also satisfy the thirst for community. When you entered sports debates, you became part of a community that was not limited to your family and friends, but was national and public. Whereas schoolwork isolated you from others, the pennant race or Ted Williams's .400 batting average was something you could talk about with people you had never met. Sports introduced you not only to a culture steeped in argument, but to a public argument culture that transcended the personal. I can't blame my schools for failing to make intellectual culture resemble the Super Bowl, but I do fault them for failing to learn anything from the sports and entertainment worlds about how to organize and represent intellectual culture, how to exploit its game-like element and turn it into arresting public spectacle that might have competed more successfully for my youthful attention.

13 For here is another thing that never dawned on me and is still kept hidden from students, with tragic results: that the real intellectual world, the one that existed in the big world beyond school, is organized very much like the world of team sports, with rival texts, rival interpretations and evaluations of texts, rival theories of why they should be read and taught, and elaborate team competitions in which "fans" of writers, intellectual systems, methodologies, and -isms contend against each other.

14 To be sure, school contained plenty of competition, which became more invidious as one moved up the ladder (and has become even more so today with the advent of high stakes testing). In this competition, points were scored not by making arguments, but by a show of information or vast reading, by grade grubbing, or other forms of one-upmanship. School competition, in short, reproduced the less attractive features of sports culture without those that create close bonds and community.

15 And in distancing themselves from anything as enjoyable and absorbing as sports, my schools missed the opportunity to capitalize on an element of drama and conflict that the intellectual world shares with sports. Consequently, I failed to see the parallels between the sports and academic worlds that could have helped me cross more readily from one argument culture to the other.

CSU EXPOSITORY READING AND WRITING COURSE | SEMESTER ONE

WHAT'S NEXT? THINKING ABOUT LIFE AFTER HIGH SCHOOL | 63

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download