10 (Self-)Critical Paradigm Shifts - EdChange



| |Multicultural Education |

|[pic] |for Equity in Our Schools: |

| |A Working Definition |

By Paul C. Gorski (gorski@)

for EdChange and the Multicultural Pavilion





Since its earliest conceptualizations in the 1960s, multicultural education has been transformed, refocused, reconceptualized, and in a constant state of evolution both in theory and in practice. It is rare that any two classroom teachers or education scholars will have the same definition for multicultural education. As with any dialogue on education, individuals tend to mold concepts to fit their particular focus.

Some discuss multicultural education as a shift in curriculum, perhaps as simple as integrating diverse content and perspectives to be more inclusive of traditionally underrepresented groups. Others talk about classroom climate issues or teaching styles that serve certain groups while presenting barriers for others. Still others focus on institutional and systemic issues such as tracking, standardized testing, or funding discrepancies. Some go further still, insisting on education change as part of a larger societal transformation in which we more closely explore and criticize the oppressive foundations of society and how education serves to maintain the status quo -- foundations such as white supremacy, capitalism, global socioeconomic situations, and exploitation.

Despite a multitude of differing conceptions, several shared principles must be met in order for any educational philosophy or practice to be called multicultural education. While some focus on individual students or teachers, and others are much more "macro" in scope, these ideals are all, at their roots, about transformation for equitable and just education:

• Every student must have an equal opportunity to achieve to her or his full potential.

• Every student must be prepared to competently participate in an increasingly intercultural society.

• Teachers must be prepared to facilitate learning for every individual student, no matter how culturally similar or different from her- or himself.

• Education professionals must be active participants in ending oppression of all types, first by ending oppression within their classroom and school walls, then by facilitating the growth of socially and critically active and aware students.

• Education must be student-centered, empowering, and inclusive of the voices and experiences of the students.

• Educators, activists, and others must take a more active role in reexamining all educational practices and policies and how they impact the learning of all students. These include testing and assessment methods, teaching approaches, school psychology and counseling, educational materials and textbooks, leadership, community involvement, curricula, classroom materials, and all other aspects of schools and schooling.

• The goal must be an education that is just and equitable for every student, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, (dis)ability, home or first language, or any other dimension of identity or culture.

Most importantly, if an approach or program does not move a classroom, school, district, organization, or society closer to equity and social justice, it cannot be called multicultural education.

Guided by these principles, I lay out my conception for multicultural education below.

A Working Definition of Multicultural Education

Multicultural education is a progressive approach for transforming schools and schooling that holistically critiques and eliminates all conscious or unconscious discriminatory and repressive practices in education. It is grounded in ideals of social justice, education equity, and a dedication to facilitating educational experiences in which all students reach their full potential as learners and as socially aware and active citizens, locally, nationally, and globally. Multicultural education acknowledges that schools are essential to laying the foundation for the transformation of society and the elimination of oppression and injustice.

The underlying goal of multicultural education is to affect change in the consciousness of people, the policies and practices of schools, and the disparities in access and opportunities in society. The pathway toward this goal incorporates three strands of transformation:

the transformation of self;

the transformation of schools and schooling; and

the transformation of society.

1. The Transformation of Self

As an educator, I must engage in a critical and continual process of examining how my prejudices, biases, and assumptions inform my teaching and thus affect the educational experiences of my students. I must understand the lenses through which I experience the people and happenings around me. Only when I have a sense for how my own perceptions are developed in relation to my life experiences can I truly understand the world around me and effectively navigate my relationships with colleagues. I also have a responsibility to my students to work toward eliminating my prejudices, examining who is (and is not) being reached by my teaching style, and relearning how my own identity affects their learning experiences. To be an effective multicultural educator -- an effective educator in general -- I must be in a constant process of self-examination and transformation.

In addition, I must, whenever and wherever possible, advocate for equity and justice for my students and all underheard, disempowered, and repressed people.

2. The Transformation of Schools and Schooling

Multicultural education calls for a critical examination of all aspects of schools schooling. Dimensions of multicultural school transformation include the following:

Critical Pedagogy

• The experiences of students must be brought to the fore in the classroom, making learning more active, relevant, and engaging.

• Traditional teaching approaches and pedagogical models must be deconstructed to examine how they are contributing to and supporting institutional systems of oppression.

• Known oppressive practices like tracking (even if informal) must be exposed and eliminated.

• All aspects of teaching and learning in schools must be refocused on, and rededicated to, the students themselves instead of standardized test scores and school rankings.

• Education should emphasize critical and creative thinking, learning skills, and deep social awareness as well as facts and figures.

• Pedagogy must provide every students with an equal opportunity to reach her or his full potential as a learner.

• Pedagogy must be flexible enough to allow for the diversity of learning styles present in every classroom.

Multicultural Curriculum

• All curricula must be studied for accuracy and completeness.

• All subjects must be told from diverse perspectives -- this is related to accuracy and completeness.

• "Inclusive curriculum" also means including the voices of the students in the classroom.

• Concepts such as "the canon" and "classic literature" must be reconceptualized, again with the idea of accuracy and completeness, to debunk the perception that the only great literature came from the U.S. and England.

• Students must be engaged in critical dialogue about racism, sexism, classism, and other forms of oppression that continue to plague society and the world.

• Curricula should reflect the diversity of learning styles in every classroom.

Inclusive Educational Media and Materials

• Educational materials should be inclusive of diverse voices and perspectives.

• Students must be encouraged to think critically about materials and media: Whose voice are they hearing? Whose voice are they not hearing? Why did that company produce that film? What is the bias this author may bring to her or his writing?

Supportive School and Classroom Climate

• Teachers must be prepared to foster a positive classroom climate for ALL students.

• Overall school cultures must be examined to determine how they might be cycling and supporting oppressive societal conditions.

• Administrative hierarchies in schools must be examined to assess whether they produce positive teaching environments for all teachers.

• Teachers and administrators must be held accountable for practices deemed to be racist, sexist, heterosexist, classist, or in any other way discriminatory.

Continual Evaluation and Assessment

• Educators and education researchers must continue to examine the emphasis on standardized test scores and develop more just alternatives for measuring student "achievement," "ability," or "potential."

• Continuing evaluation measures must be taken to measure the success of new and existing programs meant to provide more opportunities to groups traditionally and presently underrepresented in colleges and universities.

• Schools must embark on continuous assessment to identity and eliminate all inequities in schools.

3. The Transformation of Society

Ultimately, the goal of multicultural education is to contribute to the transformation of society and to the application and maintenance of social justice and equity. This stands to reason, as the transformation of schools necessarily impacts a society that puts so much stock in educational attainment, degrees, and test scores. In fact, it is particularly this competitive, capitalistic framing of the dominant mentality of the United States (and increasingly, with the "help" of the United States, the world) that multicultural education aims to challenge, shake, expose, and critique. This is precisely the reason that it is not enough to continue working within an ailing, oppressive, and outdated system to make changes, when the problems in education are themselves symptoms of a system that continues to be controlled by the economic elite. One does not need to study education too closely to recognize that schools consistently provide continuing privilege to the privileged and continuing struggle for the struggling with very little hope of upward mobility. "Informal" tracking, standardized testing, discrepancies in the quality of schools within and across regions, and other practices remain from the industrial-age model of schools. Only the terminology has changed, and the practices are not quite as overt.

Educators, educational theorists, researchers, activists, and everyone else must continue to practice and apply multicultural teaching and learning principles both in and out of the classroom. We must not allow the fact that most people working in schools are well-intentioned to lead us to assume that our schools are immune to the oppression and inequity of society. We must ask the unaskable questions. We must explore and deconstruct structures of power and privilege that maintain the status quo.

In a sense, multicultural education uses the transformation of self and schools as a metaphor and starting place for the transformation of society. Ultimately, social justice and equity in schools can, and should, mean social justice and equity in society. Only then will the purpose of multicultural education be fully achieved.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download