2017-18 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Texas ...
Texas Education Agency 2017-18 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools
Campus Name: FALL CREEK EL Campus ID: 101913124
District Name: HUMBLE ISD
Part (i): General Description of the Texas State Accountability System Under Subsection (c)
Part (i)(I) the minimum number of students that the State determines are necessary to be included in each of the subgroups of students, as defined in subsection (c)(2), for use in the accountability system; The Texas accountability minimum size criteria are 25 tests for assessments related indicators or 25 students for non-assessment related indicators, such as graduation, for any student group, and 10 tests or students for All student group.
Part (i)(II) the long-term goals and measurements of interim progress for all students and for each of the subgroups of students, as defined in subsection (c)(2);
Academic Performance (At Meets Grade Level Reading/ELA or Above)
Mathematics
EL Progress Graduation Rate:4-Year Longitudinal Rate
Baseline 2016-17 Rates
All African Students American Hispanic
44% 32% 37%
American White Indian Asian 60% 43% 74%
Two or Pacific More Econ Islander Races Disadv 45% 56% 33%
EL (Current Special and Educ Former) 19% 29%
2017-18 through 2021-22 2022-23 through 2026-27 2027-28 through 2031-32 2032-33 Baseline 2016-17 Rates 2017-18 through 2021-22 2022-23 through 2026-27 2027-28 through 2031-32 2032-33 Baseline 2016-17 Rates 2017-18 through 2021-22 2022-23 through 2026-27 2027-28 through 2031-32 Baseline 2016-17 Rates 2017-18 through 2021-22 2022-23 through 2026-27 2027-28 through 2031-32
44% 52% 62% 72% 46% 46% 54% 63% 73%
89% 90% 92% 94%
32% 42% 54% 66% 31% 31% 41% 54% 66%
85% 90% 92% 94%
37% 46% 58% 69% 40% 40% 49% 59% 70%
60% 66% 73% 80% 59% 59% 65% 73% 80%
87% 90% 92% 94%
93% 90% 92% 94%
43% 51% 62% 72% 45% 45% 53% 63% 73%
86% 90% 92% 94%
74% 78% 82% 87% 82% 82% 85% 88% 91%
45% 53% 63% 73% 50% 50% 57% 66% 75%
56% 62% 70% 78% 54% 54% 61% 69% 77%
33% 43% 55% 67% 36% 36% 45% 57% 68%
19% 31% 45% 60% 23% 23% 34% 48% 62%
95% 90% 92% 94%
89% 90% 92% 94%
92% 90% 92% 94%
86% 90% 92% 94%
78% 90% 92% 94%
29% 39% 52% 65% 40% 40% 49% 59% 70% 41% 42% 44% 46% 72% 90% 92% 94%
Part (i)(III) the indicators described in subsection (c)(4)(B) used to meaningfully differentiate all public schools in the State; a. Academic Achievement Indicator: STAAR Performance Status (Percent at or above Meets Grade Level) b. Other Academic Indicator for Non-High Schools: STAAR Growth Status c. Graduation Rate: Federal Graduation Status d. ELP Indicator: English Learner Language Proficiency Status e. School Quality or Student Success (SQSS) Indicators: College, Career, and Military Readiness for High Schools and K-12; Student Achievement Domain Score: STAAR only for All Other Schools without Annual Graduates
Part (i)(IV) the State's system for meaningfully differentiating all public schools in the State, including: (aa) the specific weight of the indicators described in subsection (c)(4)(B) in such differentiation;
Campus Type Elementary and Middle Schools
Indicator Academic Achievement Other Academic Indicator
Weight 30% 50%
Campus Type High Schools and K-12
Indicator English Learner Language proficiency SQSS: Student Achievement Domain Score Academic Achievement 4-Year Graduation Rate English Learner Language proficiency SQSS: College, Career, and Military Readiness
Weight 10% 10% 50% 10% 10% 30%
(bb) the methodology by which the State differentiates all such schools; A weighted average of the accountability indicators will be computed from the number of items meeting targets divided by the number of items evaluated. The weighted average will be scaled to grades A (90-00), B (80-89), C (70-79), D (60-69), and F (0-59) and further used to differentiate all public schools. (cc) the methodology by which the State differentiates a school as consistently underperforming for any subgroup of students described in section (c)(4)(C)(iii), including the time period used by the State to determine consistent underperformance; Student group achievement is monitored annually through the Closing the Gaps domain of the State accountability. Any campus that has one or more achievement gap(s) between individual student groups and the interim goals for three consecutive years will be identified as a consistently underperforming school. (dd) the methodology by which the State identifies a school for comprehensive support and improvement as required under subsection (c)(4)(D)(i); The Closing the Gaps domain scaled score is used to identify schools for comprehensive support and improvement. TEA rank orders the scaled domain score for all campuses. The lowest five percent of campuses that receive Title I, Part A funds are identified for comprehensive support and improvement. Also, if a campus does not attain a 67 percent four-year graduation rate for the all students group, the campus is also automatically identified for comprehensive support and improvement. Additionally, any Title I campus identified for targeted support and improvement for three consecutive years is identified for comprehensive support and improvement the following school year. TEA will annually identify campuses for comprehensive support and improvement beginning with the August 2018 accountability release, which is based on school year 2017-18 performance data.
Part (i)(V) the number and names of all public schools in the State identified by the State for comprehensive support and improvement under subsection (c)(4)(D)(i) or implementing targeted support and improvement plans under subsection (d)(2); Comprehensive Support and Improvement Schools and Additional Targeted Support Schools list those campuses that have been identified for comprehensive support and additional targeted support based on performance in the Closing the Gaps domain (Excel file).
Part (i)(VI) the exit criteria established by the State as required under clause (i) of subsection (d)(3)(A), including the length of years established under clause (i)(II) of such subsection. Campuses that do not rank in the bottom five percent of the Closing the Gaps domain for two consecutive years and have increased a letter grade (for example, from F to D or from D to C) on the Closing the Gaps domain will be considered as having successfully exited comprehensive support and improvement status. To exit additional targeted support and improvement status, a student group must meet at least 50 percent of the indicators evaluated and meet the targets for the Academic Achievement component in both reading and mathematics.
Part (ii): Student Achievement by Proficiency Level
This section provides information on student achievement on the STAAR (State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness) performance for mathematics, ELA/reading, and science by grade level and proficiency level for the 2017-18 school year. These results include all students tested, regardless of whether they were in the accountability subset.
Two or
Non
African
American
Pacific More Econ Econ
Foster
State District CampusAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Disadv CWD CWOD EL Male Female Migrant Homeless Care Military
STAAR Percent at Approaches Grade Level or Above
Grade 3
Reading
All
77% 79% 81% 67% 74% 92%
-
91% -
* 67% 84% 36% 85% 46% 79% 83%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 51% 53% 36%
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
* 42% 36% -
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 79% 81% 85% 78% 76% 93%
-
91% -
* 71% 88% - 85% 55% 85% 84%
-
*
-
*
EL
70% 65% 46%
*
*
*
-
*
-
-
*
*
* 55% 46% *
*
-
*
-
-
Male 74% 76% 79% 71% 71% 87%
-
85% -
- 67% 82% * 85% * 79% -
-
-
-
*
Female 79% 82% 83% 63% 78% 97%
-
90% -
* 67% 87% * 84% *
- 83%
-
*
-
*
Mathematics All
77% 78% 86% 79% 81% 90%
- 100% -
* 83% 87% 50% 89% 77% 87% 86%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 52% 50% 50%
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
* 58% 50% -
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 80% 80% 89% 88% 82% 92%
- 100% -
* 88% 90% - 89% 82% 93% 87%
-
*
-
*
EL
74% 71% 77%
*
*
*
- 100% -
-
* 73% * 82% 77% 75% *
-
*
-
-
Male Female
Two or
Non
African
American
Pacific More Econ Econ
State District CampusAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Disadv CWD CWOD EL
77% 78% 87% 83% 83% 87%
-
92% -
- 83% 88% * 93% 75%
78% 78% 86% 75% 78% 94%
- 100% -
* 83% 87% * 87% *
Foster
Male Female Migrant Homeless Care Military
87% -
-
-
-
*
- 86%
-
*
-
*
Grade 4
Reading
All
72% 76% 82% 61% 88% 92%
- 100% -
* 54% 89% * 86% 100% 77% 88%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 46% 46%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
*
-
-
CWOD 75% 79% 86% 65% 93% 96%
- 100% -
* 58% 92% - 86% 100% 81% 91%
-
*
-
*
EL
60% 55% 100%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
- 100% - 100% 100% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 70% 74% 77% 55% 80% 91%
- 100% -
* 53% 83% * 81% * 77% -
-
*
-
-
Female 75% 78% 88% 68% 92% 93%
- 100% -
* 54% 95% * 91% *
- 88%
-
*
-
*
Mathematics All
77% 77% 83% 59% 88% 94%
-
94% - 100% 61% 88% * 87% 100% 81% 85%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 49% 44%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
*
-
-
CWOD 81% 81% 87% 65% 93% 98%
-
94% - 100% 71% 91% - 87% 100% 86% 89%
-
*
-
*
EL
72% 64% 100%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
- 100% - 100% 100% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 77% 76% 81% 59% 80% 96%
-
91% -
* 60% 86% * 86% * 81% -
-
*
-
-
Female 78% 78% 85% 59% 92% 93%
- 100% -
* 62% 90% * 89% *
- 85%
-
*
-
*
Grade 5
Reading
All
83% 88% 90% 78%
89% 100% * 100% *
83% 76% 94% * 93% 83% 91% 90%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 54% 54%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 87% 91% 93% 81%
93% 100% * 100% * 100% 77% 97% - 93% 83% 92% 93%
-
*
-
*
EL
73% 72% 83%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
* 100% - 83% 83% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 81% 87% 91% 73% 87% 100% *
*
-
* 71% 96% * 92% * 91% -
-
*
-
*
Female 86% 89% 90% 80% 92% 100% -
*
*
* 79% 93% * 93% *
- 90%
-
-
-
-
Mathematics All
90% 90% 94% 82% 100% 100% * 100% *
83% 82% 97% * 96% 100% 97% 91%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 70% 62%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 92% 93% 96% 88% 100% 100% * 100% * 100% 88% 99% - 96% 100% 98% 95%
-
*
-
*
EL
86% 84% 100%
-
100% -
-
*
-
-
* 100% - 100% 100% 100% *
-
-
-
-
Male 89% 90% 97% 87% 100% 100% *
*
-
* 93% 98% * 98% 100% 97% -
-
*
-
*
Female 91% 91% 91% 80% 100% 100% -
*
*
* 75% 97% * 95% *
- 91%
-
-
-
-
Science
All
75% 78% 88% 73% 90% 98%
* 100% *
83% 71% 94% * 90% 75% 87% 89%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 48% 50%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 78% 81% 90% 76% 90% 98%
* 100% * 100% 72% 95% - 90% 75% 88% 91%
-
*
-
*
EL
62% 60% 75%
-
71% -
-
*
-
-
* 83% - 75% 75% 100% *
-
-
-
-
Male 76% 80% 87% 53% 93% 100% *
*
-
* 64% 94% * 88% 100% 87% -
-
*
-
*
Female 75% 76% 89% 83% 87% 96%
-
*
*
* 75% 93% * 91% *
- 89%
-
-
-
-
STAAR Percent at Meets Grade Level or Above
Grade 3
Reading
All
43% 45% 55% 40% 51% 67%
-
59% -
* 31% 61% 29% 57% 8% 48% 61%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 28% 31% 29%
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
* 33% 29% -
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 44% 47% 57% 48% 51% 66%
-
59% -
* 32% 63% - 57% 9% 51% 63%
-
*
-
*
EL
32% 23% 8%
*
*
*
-
*
-
-
*
*
* 9% 8% *
*
-
*
-
-
Male 40% 41% 48% 29% 54% 55%
-
54% -
- 22% 55% * 51% * 48% -
-
-
-
*
Female 45% 50% 61% 50% 48% 78%
-
60% -
* 39% 67% * 63% *
- 61%
-
*
-
*
Two or
Non
African
American
Pacific More Econ Econ
Foster
State District CampusAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Disadv CWD CWOD EL Male Female Migrant Homeless Care Military
Mathematics All
46% 46% 69% 56% 57% 81%
-
82% -
* 53% 73% 36% 72% 38% 68% 70%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 30% 31% 36%
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
* 42% 36% -
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 48% 47% 72% 65% 58% 81%
-
82% -
* 56% 76% - 72% 45% 73% 71%
-
*
-
*
EL
39% 35% 38%
*
*
*
-
50% -
-
* 36% * 45% 38% 50% *
-
*
-
-
Male 47% 47% 68% 54% 67% 74%
-
77% -
- 50% 73% * 73% 50% 68% -
-
-
-
*
Female 45% 45% 70% 58% 48% 88%
-
80% -
* 56% 73% * 71% *
- 70%
-
*
-
*
Grade 4
Reading
All
45% 48% 55% 36% 44% 70%
-
72% -
* 29% 61% * 58% 100% 48% 62%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 28% 30%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
*
-
-
CWOD 47% 50% 58% 40% 47% 75%
-
72% -
* 33% 64% - 58% 100% 53% 64%
-
*
-
*
EL
29% 24% 100%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
- 100% - 100% 100% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 43% 46% 48% 27% 45% 57%
-
82% -
* 27% 53% * 53% * 48% -
-
*
-
-
Female 47% 51% 62% 45% 38% 80%
-
57% -
* 31% 69% * 64% *
- 62%
-
*
-
*
Mathematics All
48% 48% 53% 27% 41% 67%
-
89% -
83% 14% 62% * 55% 100% 53% 54%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 29% 31%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
*
-
-
CWOD 50% 50% 55% 30% 43% 67%
-
89% -
83% 17% 63% - 55% 100% 54% 56%
-
*
-
*
EL
38% 31% 100%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
- 100% - 100% 100% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 48% 48% 53% 23% 45% 67%
-
91% -
* 20% 60% * 54% * 53% -
-
*
-
-
Female 47% 47% 54% 32% 31% 67%
-
86% -
*
8% 64% * 56% *
- 54%
-
*
-
*
Grade 5
Reading
All
53% 60% 72% 60% 61% 85%
*
71% *
83% 58% 76% * 75% 33% 67% 76%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 30% 32%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 56% 62% 75% 64% 63% 87%
*
71% * 100% 61% 79% - 75% 33% 69% 80%
-
*
-
*
EL
35% 29% 33%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
* 40% - 33% 33% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 50% 59% 67% 60% 53% 79%
*
*
-
* 57% 70% * 69% * 67% -
-
*
-
*
Female 56% 61% 76% 60% 69% 92%
-
*
*
* 58% 81% * 80% *
- 76%
-
-
-
-
Mathematics All
57% 60% 69% 53% 63% 83%
*
86% *
83% 47% 76% * 73% 50% 70% 69%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 34% 35%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 60% 62% 73% 57% 66% 87%
*
86% * 100% 50% 80% - 73% 50% 74% 72%
-
*
-
*
EL
46% 40% 50%
-
43% -
-
*
-
-
* 50% - 50% 50% 80% *
-
-
-
-
Male 57% 60% 70% 47% 67% 82%
*
*
-
* 57% 74% * 74% 80% 70% -
-
*
-
*
Female 58% 60% 69% 57% 60% 85%
-
*
*
* 40% 78% * 72% *
- 69%
-
-
-
-
Science
All
40% 44% 64% 40% 50% 91%
*
71% *
67% 47% 70% * 67% 25% 68% 61%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 25% 28%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 42% 45% 67% 43% 52% 92%
*
71% *
80% 50% 72% - 67% 25% 70% 64%
-
*
-
*
EL
24% 22% 25%
-
14% -
-
*
-
-
* 33% - 25% 25% 40% *
-
-
-
-
Male 42% 47% 68% 33% 60% 89%
*
*
-
* 57% 71% * 70% 40% 68% -
-
*
-
*
Female 38% 40% 61% 43% 40% 92%
-
*
*
* 40% 68% * 64% *
- 61%
-
-
-
-
STAAR Percent at Masters Grade Level Grade 3
Reading
Two or
Non
African
American
Pacific More Econ Econ
State District CampusAmericanHispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Disadv CWD CWOD EL
All
24% 27% 32% 23% 34% 41%
-
27% -
* 14% 36% 14% 34% 8%
Students
CWD 9% 15% 14%
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
* 17% 14% -
*
CWOD 26% 28% 34% 28% 36% 41%
-
27% -
* 15% 38% - 34% 9%
EL
15% 10% 8%
*
*
*
-
*
-
-
*
*
* 9% 8%
Male 22% 23% 25% 17% 42% 19%
-
23% -
- 11% 29% * 27% *
Female 26% 30% 39% 29% 26% 63%
-
30% -
* 17% 44% * 39% *
Foster
Male Female Migrant Homeless Care Military
25% 39%
-
*
-
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
27% 39%
-
*
-
*
*
*
-
*
-
-
25% -
-
-
-
*
- 39%
-
*
-
*
Mathematics All
22% 23% 41% 25% 30% 54%
-
68% -
* 22% 45% 14% 43% 15% 36% 45%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 12% 11% 14%
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
* 17% 14% -
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 24% 24% 43% 30% 29% 56%
-
68% -
* 24% 48% - 43% 18% 38% 47%
-
*
-
*
EL
17% 12% 15%
*
*
*
-
33% -
-
* 18% * 18% 15% 25% *
-
*
-
-
Male 23% 23% 36% 17% 33% 42%
-
62% -
- 17% 41% * 38% 25% 36% -
-
-
-
*
Female 21% 23% 45% 33% 26% 66%
-
70% -
* 28% 49% * 47% *
- 45%
-
*
-
*
Grade 4
Reading
All
23% 27% 42% 30% 22% 57%
-
61% -
* 18% 48% * 45% 60% 34% 51%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 9% 10%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
*
-
-
CWOD 25% 28% 45% 33% 23% 60%
-
61% -
* 21% 50% - 45% 60% 38% 53%
-
*
-
*
EL
12% 8% 60%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
- 60% - 60% 60% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 22% 26% 34% 23% 25% 39%
-
64% -
* 20% 38% * 38% * 34% -
-
*
-
-
Female 25% 27% 51% 36% 15% 70%
-
57% -
* 15% 59% * 53% *
- 51%
-
*
-
*
Mathematics All
26% 26% 34% 16% 25% 43%
-
61% -
50% 11% 39% * 35% 60% 38% 30%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 11% 12%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
*
-
-
CWOD 28% 28% 35% 18% 27% 42%
-
61% -
50% 13% 39% - 35% 60% 39% 30%
-
*
-
*
EL
18% 14% 60%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
- 60% - 60% 60% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 27% 28% 38% 18% 30% 50%
-
64% -
* 20% 42% * 39% * 38% -
-
*
-
-
Female 25% 25% 30% 14% 15% 37%
-
57% -
*
0% 36% * 30% *
- 30%
-
*
-
*
Grade 5
Reading
All
26% 30% 42% 29% 36% 57%
*
43% *
50% 24% 48% * 44% 17% 36% 47%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 9% 8%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 27% 32% 44% 31% 37% 58%
*
43% *
60% 26% 49% - 44% 17% 36% 50%
-
*
-
*
EL
12% 9% 17%
-
*
-
-
*
-
-
* 20% - 17% 17% *
*
-
-
-
-
Male 24% 28% 36% 27% 27% 46%
*
*
-
* 21% 40% * 36% * 36% -
-
*
-
*
Female 28% 32% 47% 30% 46% 69%
-
*
*
* 26% 54% * 50% *
- 47%
-
-
-
-
Mathematics All
30% 34% 46% 24% 37% 63%
*
86% *
50% 24% 53% * 48% 25% 47% 45%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 13% 15%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 31% 35% 48% 26% 38% 65%
*
86% *
60% 25% 55% - 48% 25% 49% 47%
-
*
-
*
EL
19% 19% 25%
-
14% -
-
*
-
-
* 33% - 25% 25% 40% *
-
-
-
-
Male 29% 35% 47% 20% 33% 61%
*
*
-
* 29% 52% * 49% 40% 47% -
-
*
-
*
Female 30% 32% 45% 27% 40% 65%
-
*
*
* 20% 53% * 47% *
- 45%
-
-
-
-
Science
All
16% 19% 34% 16% 27% 47%
*
43% *
67% 15% 39% * 35% 0% 35% 33%
-
*
-
*
Students
CWD 9% 10%
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
-
-
*
*
-
-
-
-
CWOD 17% 19% 35% 17% 28% 49%
*
43% *
80% 16% 41% - 35% 0% 37% 34%
-
*
-
*
EL
7% 6% 0%
-
0%
-
-
*
-
-
*
0% - 0% 0% 0% *
-
-
-
-
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- san elizario independent school district
- school district and campus websites august 2019
- texas 2012 nclb report card part i preview c o n f i d e n
- texas school breakfast
- district federal report card 2017 2018
- texas education agency 2016 17 federal report card for
- kerrville independent school district
- samples and forms
- 2017 18 federal report card for texas public schools texas
- instructions for completion are on back of form txdps
Related searches
- texas report card for schools
- tn report card for schools
- blank report card for student
- report card for middle school
- national report card for schools
- alabama report card for schools
- texas schools report card 2019
- texas schools report card 2018
- grades for texas public schools
- seattle public schools 2017 18 calendar
- texas public schools report card
- state report card for schools