Charlotte Danielson Education) FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING ...

FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Charlotte Danielson (adapted for Kentucky Department of Education)

February 2014

The Framework for Teaching is a research-based set of components of instruction, aligned to the INTASC standards, and grounded in a constructivist view of learning and teaching. The complex activity

of teaching is divided into multiple standards clustered into four domains of teaching responsibility:

1. Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction

4. Professional Responsibilities

It is important to realize that this Framework takes into account the Kentucky Teacher Standards, the Kentucky Board of Education's Program of Studies, Kentucky Academic Standards, and the Kentucky Department of Education's Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning.

Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching, 2014

FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING DOMAINS & COMMON THEMES:

Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education

INTRODUCTION: The Framework for Teaching organizes the multiple measures that comprised Kentucky's previous Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System. This framework is designed to support student achievement and professional best-practice through the domains of Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Professional Responsibilities. The Framework also includes many themes that run throughout the document. These themes include ideas such as equity, cultural competence, high expectations, developmental appropriateness, accommodating individual needs, effective technology integration, and student assumption of responsibility. The Kentucky Teaching Standards, Kentucky Department of Education's Characteristics of Highly Effecting Teaching and Learning, along with research from many of the top educator appraisal specialists and researchers are the foundation for this system. The Framework for Teaching provides structure and feedback for continuous improvement through individual goals that target student and professional growth, thus supporting overall school improvement. Teacher performance will be rated for each component according to four performance levels: Ineffective, Developing, Accomplished, and Exemplary. It is important to know that the expected performance level is "Accomplished" which is bolded in the framework, but a good rule of thumb is that it is expected for a teacher to "live in Accomplished but occasionally visit Exemplary". Exemplary is purposefully designed to be difficult to achieve. The summative rating will be a holistic representation of performance, combining data from multiple measures across each domain.

1

Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching, 2014

Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education

Component

Domain 1: Planning & Preparation

1A - Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy

Knowledge of Content and the Structure of the Discipline Knowledge of Prerequisite Relationships Knowledge of Content-Related Pedagogy

Critical Attributes

Possible Examples

In order to guide student learning, accomplished teachers have command of the subjects they teach. They must know how the discipl ine has evolvDedoinmtoathine 21st century, incorporating

such issues as global awareness and cultural diversity, as appropriate. Accomplished teachers understand the internal relationships within the disciplines they teach, knowing which

concepts and skills are prerequisite to the understanding of others. They are also aware of typical student misconceptions in the discipline and work to dispel them. But knowledge of the

content is not sufficient; in advancing student understanding, teachers are familiar with the particularly pedagogical approaches best suited to each discipline.

Ineffective

Developing

Accomplished

Exemplary

In planning and practice, teacher makes

Teacher is familiar with the important

Teacher displays solid knowledge of the

Teacher displays extensive knowledge of

content errors or does not correct errors

made by studeEntlse. ment(s)

Teacher's plans and practice display little

concepts in the discipline but displays lack of awareness of how these concepts relate to one another.

important concepts in the discipline and the ways they relate to one another. Teacher's plans and practice reflect

the important concepts in the discipline and the ways they relate both to one another and to other disciplines.

understanding of prerequisite relationships Teacher's plans and practice indicate some

accurate understanding of prerequisite

Teacher's plans and practice reflect

important to student's learning of the

awareness of prerequisite relationships,

relationships among topics and concepts.

understanding of prerequisite relationships

content.

although such knowledge may be

Teacher's plans and practice reflect

among topics and concepts and provide a

Teacher displays little or no understanding of

inaccurate or incomplete.

familiarity with a wide range of effective

link to necessary cognitive structures

COMMON LANGUAGE therangeofpedagogicalapproachessuitable

to student's learning of the content. Teacher makes content errors.

Teacher's plans and practice reflect a limited range of pedagogical approaches to the discipline or to the students.

Teacher is familiar with the discipline but

pedagogical approaches to thediscipline.

needed by students to ensure uTenadcehrestra'snpdlianngs.and practice reflect

familiarity with a wide range of effective

The teacher can identify important concepts

pedagogical approaches in the discipline,

In adadnittiiocinpatotinthgesPtcuhedaerranfctotmerriismsctoicnasconefpctieonLs.evel

Teacher does not consider prerequisite

relationships when planning. Teacher's plans use inappropriate strategies

does not see conceptual relationships.

Teacher's knowledge of prerequisite relationships is inaccurate or incomplete.

of the discipline and their relationships to

In dioTchnaeetatenoaocrthhseerr.consistently provides clear

"accomplished": Teacher cites intra- and interdisciplinary

content relationships.

for the discipline.

Lesson and unit plans use limited instructional strategies, and some may not

explanations of the content. The teacher answers student questions

Teacher is proactive in uncovering student misconceptions and addressing them before

be suitable to the content.

accurately and provides feedback that

proceeding.

furthers their learning.

Essential guidance for The teacher seeks out content-related

The teacher says "the official language of

The teacher plansolebsssoensrovnearresa and

professional development. The teacher's plan for area and perimeter

In a unit on 19th century literature, the

Brazil is Spanish, just like other South

perimeter independently of one another,

American countries."

without linking the concepts together.

The teacher says, "I don't understand why the math book has decimals in the same unit as

The teacher plans to forge ahead with a lesson on addition with regrouping, even

fractions."

though some students have not fully

The teacher has students copy dictionary

grasped place value.

definitions each week to help his students

The teacher always plans the same routine

invites students to determine the shape

teacher incorporates information about the

that will yield the largest area for a given

history of the same period.

perimeter.

Before beginning a unit on the solar system,

The teacher realizes her students are not

the teacher surveys the class on their beliefs

sure howIlltouussteraactoemspatssh, seo smheeplaanns itno g of about why it is hotter in the summer than in

ponraacntigcleetmhaeftarbsuaerfmoemreeeinnwtt.roodruckinlgathnegacutiavitgye

the winter.

learn to spell difficult words.

to study spelling: pretest on Monday, copy The teacher plans to expand a unit on civics

2

Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching, 2011

Framework Overview

the words 5 times each on Tuesday and Wednesday, test on Friday.

Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education

by having students simulate a court trial.

3

Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching, 2014

Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education

Domain 1 Planning & Preparation

A. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy i. Knowledge of Content and the Structure of the Discipline ii. Knowledge of Prerequisite Relationships iii. Knowledge of Content-Related Pedagogy

B. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students i. Knowledge of Child and Adolescent Development ii. Knowledge of the Learning Process iii. Knowledge of Students' Skills, Knowledge, and Language Proficiency iv. Knowledge of Students' Interests and Cultural Heritage v. Knowledge of Students' Special Needs

C. Selecting Instructional Outcomes i. Value, Sequence, and Alignment ii. Clarity iii. Balance iv. Suitability for Diverse Learners

D. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources i. Resources for Classroom Use ii. Resources to Extend Content Knowledge and Pedagogy iii. Resources for Students

E. Designing Coherent Instruction i. Learning Activities ii. Instructional Materials and Resources iii. Instructional Groups iv. Lesson and Unit Structure

F. Designing Student Assessment i. Congruence with Instructional Outcomes ii. Criteria and Standards iii. Design of Formative Assessments iv. Use for Planning

Domain 2 Classroom Environment

A. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport i. Teacher Interaction with Students ii. Student Interactions with One Another

B. Establishing a Culture for Learning i. Importance of the Content ii. Expectations for Learning and Achievement iii. Student Pride in Work

C. Managing Classroom Procedures i. Management of Instructional Groups ii. Management of Transitions iii. Management of Materials and Supplies iv. Performance of Non-Instructional Duties v. Supervision of Volunteers and Paraprofessionals

D. Managing Student Behavior i. Expectations ii. Monitoring of Student Behavior iii. Response to Student Misbehavior

E. Organizing Physical Space i. Safety and Accessibility ii. Arrangement of Furniture and Use of Physical Resources

Domain 3 Instruction

A. Communicating with Students i. Expectations for Learning ii. Directions and Procedures iii. Explanation of Content iv. Use of Oral and Written Language

B. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques i. Quality of Questions ii. Discussion Techniques iii. Student Participation

C. Engaging Students in Learning i. Activities and Assignments ii. Grouping of Students iii. Instructional Materials and Resources iv. Structure and Pacing

D. Using Assessment in Instruction i. Assessment Criteria ii. Monitoring of Student Learning iii. Feedback to Students iv. Student Self-Assessment and Monitoring of Progress

E. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness i. Lesson Adjustment ii. Response to Students iii. Persistence

Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities

A. Reflecting on Teaching i. Accuracy ii. Use in Future Teaching

B. Maintaining Accurate Records i. Student Completion of Assignments ii. Student Progress in Learning iii. Non-Instructional Records

C. Communicating with Families i. Information About the Instructional Program ii. Information About Individual Students iii. Engagement of Families in the Instructional Program

D. Participating in a Professional Community i. Relationships with Colleagues ii. Involvement in a Culture of Professional Inquiry iii. Service to the School iv. Participation in School and District Projects

E. Growing and Developing Professionally i. Enhancement of Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Skill ii. Receptivity to Feedback from Colleagues iii. Service to the Profession

F. Demonstrating Professionalism i. Integrity and Ethical Conduct ii. Service to Students iii. Advocacy iv. Decision Making

Compliance with School and District Regulations

4

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download