Hegelian view of history

    • [DOC File]PASSION IN HEGEL’S CIVIL SOCIETY AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_e5ed63.html

      Philosophical approach: a Hegelian point of view. Hegel’s civil society is a paradoxical institution: it allows bourgeois to construct themselves as individuals and as social members. Nevertheless, at the same time, the market produces the most richest and the most poorest people, that is, it sacrifices the lives of many of its members and ...


    • [DOC File]Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_95f2b5.html

      Hegel liked Kant ethics and thought it had much in common with Jesus (Life of Jesus, 1795) depicting Christ as a moral teacher and an expounder of Kantian ethics. Thus, he rejected a view of Christ as a mediator between God and man and as imposing revealed dogma (which if Jesus did, it was not his intent).


    • [DOC File]PEIRCE, HEGEL, AND THE CATEGORY OF SECONDNESS

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_c3459f.html

      Peirce might therefore be expected to agree with this Hegelian view of indexicality, and only to object to the way in which Hegel takes it too far, and moves to claim from this that “Firstness and Secondness must somehow be aufgehoben”. ... Cf. Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, III, p. 441 [HW XX: 347-8]: “For Kant says that ...


    • [DOC File]Cheikh Anta Diop and Two Cradle Analysis:

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_0d1a81.html

      Other colleges and universities, continue to hire professors and create initiates based upon Hegelian historical assumptions. None of these professors, departments, centers and/or institutes view Afrikan history from the cultural perspective of Afrikans, but rather impose non-Afrikan standards as a universal human norm.


    • [DOC File]The Various Version’s of Hegel’s Doppelsatz

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_f65e3d.html

      8. Karl Popper in his Open Society and Its Enemies, claims that according to Hegel ‘what is, is good’. He takes the Doppelsatz as a summary of that Hegelian view: Hegel [maintains] that everything that is reasonable must be real, and everything that is real must be reasonable, and that the development of reality is the same as that of reason.


    • [DOC File]The Japanese End: Japan in Alexandre Kojève’s End of History

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_586d08.html

      The Japanese End: Japan in Alexandre Kojève’s End of History. In Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, one of the most influential interpretations on Hegelian philosophy in the 20th-century France, Alexandre Kojève describes what he calls “the Japanese End of History”, opposed to the American one.


    • [DOC File]Jacob Burckhardt: History as Education and Culture

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_cdcc6c.html

      His view of historical study as a very real and fundamental social force provided a solid critique of Hegel’s depersonalized view of history and set an example for future historians. No longer could historical study be viewed merely as an academic pursuit. Burckhardt argued that a society’s view of history influenced its future actions.


    • [DOC File]Hegel on Education

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_8c27bd.html

      London: Routledge, 1998. Hegel on Education. Allen W. Wood. Yale University. Hegel spent most of his life as an educator. Between 1794 and 1800, he was a private tutor, first in Bern, Switzerland, and then in Frankfurt-am-Main.


    • [DOC File]Biblical Criticism and Inspiration

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_b3f933.html

      --He embraced the Hegelian dialectic of thesis and antithesis with respect to these two elements of Christian history. From this he dates Acts (where Peter and Paul seem to be united, esp. chapter 15) in the Second Century AD to allow enough time for the synthesis to occur.


    • [DOC File]PHL318 (Hegel) Essay Questions

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_cfac8d.html

      If as Hegel says "philosophy is the history of philosophy", then are all philosophical claims historically conditioned and liable to reevaluation? If you incline to an Hegelian or developmental view of disagreement, how do you explain the fact that a very large majority of philosophers think they are giving the truth once and for all?



    • [DOC File]Major Economic Myths Commonly Found in the Social Sciences

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_c0f249.html

      Marxism is an economic/political system based on a mystical ‘faith’ in the Hegelian dialectical view of history. Friedrich Engels in his, Dialectics of Nature indicates all is explicable in terms of the ‘struggle of opposites’ – the ‘laws of dialectics,’ the most general laws, which may be reduced to three:


    • [DOC File]HEGEL

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_a630aa.html

      On the Phenomenology and history: Hyppolite, J. [1946] Genesis and Structure of Hegel’s ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’, part 1 ch. 2 ‘History and phenomenology’ Lukács, G. [1948] The Young Hegel, part 4 ch. 3 ‘A synoptic view of the structure of the Phenomenology’


    • [DOC File]6/6/2008 - Pitt

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_ab3571.html

      A view of agency, selves, and their relation to the community. Under this last head, I want not only the new subjective view of agency (rights of knowledge and intention) but also selves as players of roles, subject to conflicting norms, by contrast to ancient selves as characters, decisively identified with norms. Three stages of Hegelian history


    • [DOC File]Questions on Hegel’s History and Politics

      https://info.5y1.org/hegelian-view-of-history_1_0d43ee.html

      If as Hegel says "philosophy is the history of philosophy", then are all philosophical claims historically conditioned and liable to reevaluation? If you incline to an Hegelian or developmental view of disagreement, how do you explain the fact that a very large majority of philosophers think they are giving the truth once and for all?


Nearby & related entries: