Socrates and thrasymachus on justice

    • Plato's Refutation of Thrasymachus: The Craft Argument

      Plato's Refutation of Thrasymachus: The Craft Argument ' ; SAGP Edward Warren PAC 8 San Diego State University The argument in Republic Book One involves Socrates and three successive speakers, Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus; and as the discussion passes fron one speaker to the next the argument becomes more serious. The most important


    • [PDF File]Thrasymachus’ Sophistic Account of Justice in Republic i

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_ce0842.html

      Thrasymachus’ Sophistic Account of Justice in Republic i Merrick E. Anderson It is now widely recognized that Socrates’ discussion with Thrasymachus is crucially important for understanding the philosophic trajectory of Plato’s Republic.1Thrasymachus is the first character explicitly to raise considerations


    • [PDF File]THE RHETORIC OF JUSTICE: A POSTSTRUCTURALIST READING …

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_83b0e4.html

      1 Koch, Andrew M. (1997) "The Rhetoric of Justice: A Poststructuralist Reading of the Exchange Between Socrates and Thrasymachus in Plato's Republic" Texas Journal of Political Studies, 19 (1) pp. 10-28.


    • [PDF File]SOCRATES - POLEMARCHUS - THRASYMACHUS

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_7335d9.html

      Thrasymachus himself acknowledges that rulers may sometimes command what is not for their own interest, and that for subjects to obey them is justice. Yes, Polemarchus, —Thrasymachus said that for subjects to do what was commanded by their rulers is just. Yes, Cleitophon, but he also said that justice is the interest of the


    • ThraFymachus' Definition of Justice in

      remains in our memory of Thrasymachus, is that he defines "justice" (a loose word for "just action") as doing what is in the interest of the stronger. This answer also seems to be supported by Thrasymachus' own deliberate choice in face of the contradiction shown by Socrates, for he then says that justice is the real interest of the stronger ...


    • [PDF File]Thrasymachus’ Unerring Skill and the Arguments of Republic 1

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_a8a517.html

      360 Nawar Phronesis 63 (2018) 359-391 1 Introduction In Republic book 1, Thrasymachus claims that justice is the advantage of the stronger. After being shown by Socrates that several of his views are incon-sistent, Thrasymachus evades Socrates’ reductio by claiming that no ruler and no practitioner of a skill (τέχνη) ever errs ( 340e2-3).


    • [PDF File]Socrates versus Polemarchus - UW Courses Web Server

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_30d7f2.html

      Socrates versus Polemarchus (Rep. I.331d–336a) Polemarchus’s view: justice is “to give to each man what is proper to him” or “what is due” = “to benefit one’s friends and harm one’s enemies” (332d). Socrates advances four arguments against this view. Argument One: on this view justice is …


    • [PDF File]Revisiting Thrasymachus’ Challenge: Another Socratic Failure

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_aa5db5.html

      reputation forces Socrates to offer an intrinsic reason to prefer justice over injustice no matter what the consequences of being truly just are. This suits Glaucon’s purpose well. Glaucon’s concern with justice (and with Socrates defence of justice), extends only so far as justice is, by itself, worthwhile to have.


    • The Pursuit of Justice in Plato’s Republic

      Socrates. On the one hand, Socrates plays the critic of justice when combatting Cephalus and Polemarchus’ acceptance of overly plain views about what justice is, while on the other hand, he plays the defender of justice in order to counter Thrasymachus’ brash …


    • [PDF File]Ethics and politics in Socrates defense of justice

      https://info.5y1.org/socrates-and-thrasymachus-on-justice_1_5b8476.html

      Ethics and politics in Socrates’ defense of justice Rachana Kamtekar 1. ethics and politics in socrates’ defense of justice In the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the


Nearby & related entries: